Ann Huysseune’s research while affiliated with Charles University in Prague and other places

Background While adult mammals are unable to grow new nephrons, cartilaginous fish kidneys display nephrogenesis throughout life. In this study, we investigated the molecular properties of nephron progenitor cells (NPCs) within the kidney of the catshark ( Scyliorhinus canicula ). Methods We used branched DNA (bDNA) in situ hybridization to analyze markers expressed in catshark NPCs. BrdU pulse-chase labelling was also performed to test whether NPCs are slow-cycling cells. To question the mechanisms allowing NPC maintenance in the catshark post-embryonic kidney, we measured global protein synthesis rates using in vivo OP-puromycin incorporation. We also investigated the expression of two targets of the mTOR pathway, an important signaling pathway for translation initiation. Results We found that NPCs express molecular markers previously identified in mice and teleost embryonic NPCs such as the transcription factors Six2, Pax2 and Wt1. At post-embryonic stages, these NPCs are integrated into a specific nephrogenic area of the kidney and contain slow-cycling cells. We also evidenced that NPCs have lower protein synthesis levels than the differentiated cells present in forming nephrons. Such transition from low to high translation rates has been previously observed in several populations of vertebrate stem cells as they undergo differentiation. Finally, we reported the phosphorylation of two targets of the mTOR pathway, p4E-BP1 and pS6K1, in catshark differentiated epithelial cells but not in the NPCs. Conclusions This first molecular analysis of NPCs in a chondrichthyan species indicates that translation rate increases in NPCs as they differentiate into epithelial cells of the nephron.

Background Previous studies have reported that periderm (the outer ectodermal layer) in zebrafish partially expands into the mouth and pharyngeal pouches, but does not reach the medial endoderm, where the pharyngeal teeth develop. Instead, periderm-like cells, arising independently from the outer periderm, cover prospective tooth-forming epithelia and are crucial for tooth germ initiation. Here we test the hypothesis that restricted expansion of periderm is a teleost-specific character possibly related to the derived way of early embryonic development. To this end, we performed lineage tracing of the periderm in a non-teleost actinopterygian species possessing pharyngeal teeth, the sterlet sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus), and a sarcopterygian species lacking pharyngeal teeth, the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum). Results In sturgeon, a stratified ectoderm is firmly established at the end of gastrulation, with minimally a basal ectodermal layer and a surface layer that can be homologized to a periderm. Periderm expands to a limited extent into the mouth and remains restricted to the distal parts of the pouches. It does not reach the medial pharyngeal endoderm, where pharyngeal teeth are located. Thus, periderm in sturgeon covers prospective odontogenic epithelium in the jaw region (oral teeth) but not in the pharyngeal region. In axolotl, like in sturgeon, periderm expansion in the oropharynx is restricted to the distal parts of the opening pouches. Oral teeth in axolotl develop long before mouth opening and possible expansion of the periderm into the mouth cavity. Conclusions Restricted periderm expansion into the oropharynx appears to be an ancestral feature for osteichthyans, as it is found in sturgeon, zebrafish and axolotl. Periderm behavior does not correlate with presence or absence of oral or pharyngeal teeth, whose induction may depend on ‘ectodermalized’ endoderm. It is proposed that periderm assists in lumenization of the pouches to create an open gill slit. Comparison of basal and advanced actinopterygians with sarcopterygians (axolotl) shows that different trajectories of embryonic development converge on similar dynamics of the periderm: a restricted expansion into the mouth and prospective gill slits.

Background Previous studies have claimed that pharyngeal teeth in medaka (Oryzias latipes) are induced independent of retinoic acid (RA) signaling, unlike in zebrafish (Danio rerio). In zebrafish, pharyngeal tooth formation depends on a proper physical contact between the embryonic endodermal pouch anterior to the site of tooth formation, and the adjacent ectodermal cleft, an RA‐dependent process. Here, we test the hypothesis that a proper pouch–cleft contact is required for pharyngeal tooth formation in embryonic medaka, as it is in zebrafish. We used 4‐[diethylamino]benzaldehyde (DEAB) to pharmacologically inhibit RA production, and thus pouch–cleft contacts, in experiments strictly controlled in time, and analyzed these using high‐resolution imaging. Results Pharyngeal teeth in medaka were present only when the corresponding anterior pouch had reached the ectoderm (i.e., a physical pouch–cleft contact established), similar to the situation in zebrafish. Oral teeth were present even when the treatment started approximately 4 days before normal oral tooth appearance. Conclusions RA dependency for pharyngeal tooth formation is not different between zebrafish and medaka. We propose that the differential response to DEAB of oral versus pharyngeal teeth in medaka could be ascribed to the distinct germ layer origin of the epithelia involved in tooth formation in these two regions.

Bone matrix formation and mineralization are two closely related, yet separated processes. Matrix formation occurs first, mineralization is a second step strictly dependent on the dietary intake of calcium and phosphorus (P). However, mineralization is commonly used as diagnostic parameter for bone-related diseases. In this context, bone loss, often characterized as a condition with reduced bone mineral density, represents a major burden for human health, for which increased dietary mineral intake is generally recommended. Using a counterintuitive approach, we use a low-P diet followed by a sufficient-P intake to increase bone volume. We show in zebrafish by histology, qPCR, micro-CT and enzyme histochemistry that a two-months period of reduced dietary P intake stimulates extensive formation of new bone matrix, associated with the upregulation of key genes required for both bone matrix formation and mineralization. The return to a P-sufficient diet initiates the mineralization of the abundant matrix previously deposited, thus resulting in a striking increase of the mineralized bone volume as proven at the level of the vertebral column, including vertebral bodies and arches. In summary, bone matrix formation is first stimulated with a low-P diet, and its mineralization is later triggered by a sufficient-P dietary intake. In zebrafish the uncoupling of bone formation and mineralization by alternating low and sufficient dietary P intake, significantly increases the bone volume without causing skeletal malformations or ectopic mineralization. A modification of this approach to stimulate bone formation, optimized for mammalian models, can possibly open opportunities to support treatments in patients that suffer from low bone mass.

Most tooth‐bearing non‐mammalian vertebrates have the capacity to replace their teeth throughout life. This capacity was lost in mammals, which replace their teeth only once at most. Not surprisingly, continuous tooth replacement has attracted much attention. Classical morphological studies (e.g. to analyse patterns of replacement) are now being complemented by molecular studies that investigate the expression of genes involved in tooth formation. This review focuses on ray‐finned fish (actinopterygians), which have teeth often distributed throughout the mouth and pharynx, and more specifically on teleost fish, the largest group of extant vertebrates. First we highlight the diversity in tooth distribution and in tooth replacement patterns. Replacement tooth formation can start from a distinct (usually discontinuous and transient) dental lamina, but also in the absence of a successional lamina, e.g. from the surface epithelium of the oropharynx or from the outer dental epithelium of a predecessor tooth. The relationship of a replacement tooth to its predecessor is closely related to whether replacement is the result of a prepattern or occurs on demand. As replacement teeth do not necessarily have the same molecular signature as first‐generation teeth, the question of the actual trigger for tooth replacement is discussed. Much emphasis has been laid in the past on the potential role of epithelial stem cells in initiating tooth replacement. The outcome of such studies has been equivocal, possibly related to the taxa investigated, and the permanent or transient nature of the dental lamina. Alternatively, replacement may result from local proliferation of undifferentiated progenitors, stimulated by hitherto unknown, perhaps mesenchymal, factors. So far, the role of the neurovascular link in continuous tooth replacement has been poorly investigated, despite the presence of a rich vascularisation surrounding actinopterygian (as well as chondrichthyan) teeth and despite a complete arrest of tooth replacement after nerve resection. Lastly, tooth replacement is possibly co‐opted as a process to expand the number of teeth in a dentition ontogenetically whilst conserving features of the primary dentition. That neither a dental lamina, nor stem cells appear to be required for tooth replacement places teleosts in an advantageous position as models for tooth regeneration in humans, where the dental lamina regresses and epithelial stem cells are considered lost.

DAF-FM DA is widely used as a live staining compound to show the presence of nitric oxide (NO) in cells. Applying this stain to live zebrafish embryos is known to indicate early centers of bone formation, but the precise (cellular) location of the signal has hitherto not been revealed. Using sections of zebrafish embryos live-stained with DAF-FM DA, we could confirm that the fluorescent signals were predominantly located in areas of ongoing bone formation. Signals were observed in the bone and tooth matrix, in the notochord sheath, as well as in the bulbus arteriosus. Surprisingly, however, they were exclusively extracellular, even after very short staining times. Von Kossa and Alizarin red S staining to reveal mineral deposits showed that DAF-FM DA stains both the mineralized and non-mineralized bone matrix (osteoid), excluding that DAF-FM DA binds non-specifically to calcified structures. The importance of NO in bone formation by osteoblasts is nevertheless undisputed, as shown by the absence of bone structures after the inhibition of NOS enzymes that catalyze the formation of NO. In conclusion, in zebrafish skeletal biology, DAF-FM DA is appropriate to reveal bone formation in vivo, independent of mineralization of the bone matrix, but it does not demonstrate intracellular NO.

ABSTRACT Teeth are defined as internal odontodes, sharing a common ancestry with skin denticles (external odontodes). The conquest of the oropharynx by odontodes, originally limited to the body surface, is now commonly accepted (the ‘outside in’ theory on tooth origins). Yet, an unanswered question is how external epithelia could have transferred odontogenic competence to internal epithelia. Here, we review the origin, structure, and fate of the tooth-forming (odontogenic) epithelia. First, we highlight recent observations supporting the importance of a physical link between external and internal epithelia for tooth initiation. Vertebrate teeth always develop from stratified epithelia, and in several taxa, the surface layer appears to have an ectodermal signature, as periderm, ‘periderm-like’, or as ‘ectodermalized endoderm’. Tooth formation in the mouth of extant vertebrates is usually restricted to odontogenic bands or dental laminae, but odontogenic potential can be awakened outside these areas. Likewise, species belonging to early branching lineages of teleosts have teeth on all pharyngeal arches, lost in more derived taxa. Both observations confirm that tooth-forming capacity was once widespread in the oropharynx. Finally, we discuss a possible relationship between retinoic acid (RA) and sonic hedgehog (SHH) for regulating tooth formation throughout the extent of the oropharynx.

Vertebral bodies are composed of two types of metameric elements, centra and arches, each of which is considered as a developmental module. Most parts of the teleost vertebral column have a one-to-one relationship between centra and arches, although, in all teleosts, this one-to-one relationship is lost in the caudal fin endoskeleton. Deviation from the one-to-one relationship occurs in most vertebrates, related to changes in the number of vertebral centra or to a change in the number of arches. In zebrafish, deviations also occur predominantly in the caudal region of the vertebral column. In-depth phenotypic analysis of wild-type zebrafish was performed using whole-mount stained samples, histological analyses and synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy 3D reconstructions. Three deviant centra phenotypes were observed: (i) fusion of two vertebral centra, (ii) wedge-shaped hemivertebrae and (iii) centra with reduced length. Neural and haemal arches and their spines displayed bilateral and unilateral variations that resemble vertebral column phenotypes of stem-ward actinopterygians or other gnathostomes as well as pathological conditions in extant species. Whether it is possible to distinguish variations from pathological alterations and whether alterations resemble ancestral conditions is discussed in the context of centra and arch variations in other vertebrate groups and basal actinopterygian species.