Andri Yanto’s research while affiliated with University of Bangka Belitung and other places

This study emanates from the intricate nature of Indonesia's legal regulatory framework, resulting in a legal vacuum concerning the substantive content of ministerial regulations. Ministerial regulations, despite not being part of the formal hierarchy of legal regulations, constitute 31.56% of the total regulations, posing challenges of overlap and overregulation. The constrained legal attribution for ministers within a presidential system becomes a central concern. Employing a normative legal analysis approach and empirical data, this research constructs an efficient regulatory framework. The findings indicate that the elimination of ministerial regulations as a source of legislation can mitigate the issues of overlap and overregulation. Through a restructuring process, the content of ministerial regulations can be consolidated into presidential regulations, ensuring direct presidential control and regulatory efficiency at the central level. Strategic measures, such as the establishment of a special bureau under the president, facilitate synchronization and harmonization of legal regulations. With an emphasis on presidential regulations, this system supports sectoral governance and reduces the proliferation of scattered regulations. The outcome is a more efficient, non-overlapping, and accountable legal framework. In conclusion, this regulatory reform is imperative to realize an efficient and substantive legal framework in Indonesiasystem becomes a central concern. Employing a normative legal analysis approach and empirical data, this research constructs an efficient regulatory framework. The findings indicate that the elimination of ministerial regulations as a source of legislation can mitigate the issues of overlap and overregulation. Through a restructuring process, the content of ministerial regulations can be consolidated into presidential regulations, ensuring direct presidential control and regulatory efficiency at the central level. Strategic measures, such as the establishment of a special bureau under the president, facilitate synchronization and harmonization of legal regulations. With an emphasis on presidential regulations, this system supports sectoral governance and reduces the proliferation of scattered regulations. The outcome is a more efficient, non-overlapping, and accountable legal framework. In conclusion, this regulatory reform is imperative to realize an efficient and substantive legal framework in Indonesia.

Trade secrets are important economic commodities and require effective protection by the state. The existence of trade secrets is closely related to product sales value, business continuity, and fair competition among competing products. As a rule-of-law country that guarantees freedom of business, Indonesia has prepared various instruments to guarantee the protection of trade secrets. By using a juridical-normative analysis approach, this study focuses on efforts to find out the form of trade law protection in Indonesia, with a comparison of the trade secret leaks of CV Bintang Harapan. Trade secret protection in Indonesia is provided through preventive and curative efforts. The state is present to record trade secret registration and make countermeasures to complaints offences However, the low level of public awareness of business owners to register their trade secrets is still an obstacle because proving the disclosure of trade secrets can be difficult. In addition, the delict nature of the complaint also limits the government's efforts to directly follow up on trade secret violations

This study thoroughly investigates the development of an oil and natural gas mining treaty in the high seas of the North Natuna region, focusing on overlapping Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) claims involving Indonesia, Vietnam, and China. Analyzing the geopolitical and economic implications, the research utilizes a comprehensive methodology, including policy document scrutiny and an extensive literature review. The findings underscore the significant potential of North Natuna’s natural resources, accentuating the determination of the three nations to assert their territorial claims. Notably, tension arises from China’s Nine Dash Line claim, challenging the UNCLOS 1982 arbitral tribunal decision. The study recommends a tripartite resolution, emphasizing a robust Code of Conduct agreement. Despite diplomatic efforts, this research stresses the need for strengthening the Code of Conduct and adopting a tripartite reconciliation approach to ensure the security and sovereignty of the North Natuna region. Enforcing rights through the International Arbitration Tribunal is crucial for lasting peace, stability, and the sustainable management of oil and natural gas activities.

Illegal mining is a latent problem that cannot be overcome since the Reformation era until today in Bangka Belitung, with widespread impacts on environmental, social and financial losses. Indications of mining management failure are due to ineffective legal arrangements by the government. The analysis of article aims to test the effectiveness of law and regulations related to locals tin mining carried out in Bangka Belitung, the regulation of local wisdom by the community, and the potential to integrate these two aspects in an ideal law enforcement perspective. The interests of environmental conservation and limiting the rate of illegal tin mining are two aspects that are currently fundamental needs, while still requiring the presence of economic and cultural considerations of the community. Through a socio-legal approach, it can be seen that the people of Bangka Belitung have implemented a unique ecoliteracy concept through local wisdom applied in the living culture of the community. The ecoliteracy that is carried out through the active participation of the people is timah ampak. The results of the study, it was found the condition that ampak is very prospective to be integrated in legislation, as well as being a solution to the phenomenon of ‘lame-duck’ regulations that have not been sufficiently implemented due to substance issues. The recommendation of this study is the transformation of local wisdom in local regulations to re-streamline the management of illegal tin mining in Bangka Belitung.

This study examines the harmonization of criminal law with societal socio-cultural aspects, elucidating the pursuit of substantive justice at normative and theoretical levels. Achieving concordance between legal norms and community culture necessitates comprehensive law reform – an imperative alternative, particularly for nations with legal histories shaped by foreign legal traditions. Focusing on the evolution of Indonesian criminal law post the enactment of the New Criminal Code, this research unveils fundamental shifts in values, norms, and paradigms. The transition from colonial legal substance to a modern, authentic framework is evident in articles implicitly prioritizing substantive justice, aligning with Indonesia’s philosophy and socio-cultural values. Over time, Indonesia has phased out colonial law, integrating living law into the national legal fabric. The paradigmatic shift, aimed at infusing Indonesian law with a distinctive national character, presents conditions, advantages fostering substantive justice, and challenges in formulation and implementation. Despite complexities, the 63-year process of drafting the New Criminal Code has yielded profound results, enhancing the legal system. This transformative journey signifies a deliberate departure from colonial legal paradigms, embracing a framework resonating with Indonesian values. The shift underscores Indonesia’s commitment to substantive justice and resilience in overcoming challenges tied to legal reforms.

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengelaborasi pengaturan terkait dengan kewenangan monopoli oleh BUMN sebagai bagian integral dari proyeksi pembangunan kesejahteraan ekonomi di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif dan pendekatan perundang-undangan, penelitian ini berfokus pada latar belakang, dasar hukum, implementasi, dan kelemahan dari praktik monopoli oleh BUMN, terutama dalam skema persaingan usaha. Hasil analisis dalam penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa BUMN merupakan perpanjangan tangan pemerintah dalam mengelola sumberdaya dan sektor- ekonomi strategis yang menguasai hajat hidup orang banyak. Pemberian kewenangan monopoli diorientasikan guna memperkuat kapabilitas BUMN untuk berkompetisi dan mendominasi sektor ekonomi yang penting, meningkatkan penerimaan negara, serta memberi surplus bagi pembangunan nasional. Kendati demikian, pelaksanaan monopoli oleh BUMN masih menemui sejumlah tantangan, diantaranya adalah kurang efektifnya manajemen BUMN yang menyebabkan kerugian dan keuntungan tidak maksimal, serta hambatan bagi perusahaan swasta untuk berkembang dan berkompetisi di Indoneisa. Monopoli yang dijalankan secara tidak efektif menyebabkan stagnasi atau degradasi penerimaan negara, serta membatasi jumlah investasi akibat tidak terdapat ruang kompetisi yang proporsional. Dengan demikian, formulasi perbaikan tata kelola BUMN dan pengaturan monopoli menjadi aspek fundamental guna perbaikan pengelolaan sumber-sumber ekonomi strategis di Indonesia.