Andrew M. Kaunitz’s research while affiliated with Florida State College at Jacksonville and other places

Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations face difficult decisions on pursuing risk-reducing (and lifesaving) surgery, especially because of concerns about the safety of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk. However, observational data suggest that systemic menopausal hormone therapy does not elevate breast cancer risk among patients with pathogenic mutations with intact breasts who have undergone risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) before age 45 years. Accordingly, such individuals should be considered for menopausal hormone therapy to improve quality of life and to decrease health risks associated with premature menopause. Given emerging data on the potential of estrogen-only therapy to reduce breast cancer risk, clinicians caring for women with BRCA1/2 mutations could consider offering hysterectomy along with BSO as part of risk-reducing surgery.

10506 Background: After decades of use,menopausal hormone therapy influence on ovarian and endometrial cancer remains unsettled. Therefore, we assessed the long-term influence of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and CEE-alone use on ovarian and endometrial cancer incidence and mortality in long-term follow-up of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Methods: Long-term follow-up of two placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials that recruited 27,347 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years without prior breast cancer or invasive cancer within 10 years (and no baseline endometrial pathology in combined hormone trial participants) from 40 US centers from 1993-1998. In 16,608 women with a uterus, 8,506 were randomized to daily 0.625 mg/d of CEE plus 2.5 mg/d of MPA and 8,102, placebo. In 10,739 women with prior hysterectomy, 5,310 were randomized to daily 0.625 mg/d of CEE-alone and 5,429, placebo. Intervention was stopped for cause before the planned 8.5-year intervention after 5.6 years (CEE plus MPA) and after 7.2 years (CEE-alone). Cancers were verified by central pathology report review. Mortality findings were enhanced by serial National Death Index (NDI) queries. The primary study outcomes were ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer incidence and related mortality. Results: After 20-year follow-up, with mortality information for > 98%; in the initial WHI report on CEE-alone influence on ovarian cancer, CEE-alone, versus placebo, significantly increased ovarian cancer incidence (35 cases [0.041% annualized rate] vs 17 [0.020%]; hazard ratio [HR], 2.04; 95% CI 1.14-3.65; P = 0.01) and ovarian cancer mortality (HR 2.79 95% CI 1.30-5.99, P = 0.006). KM-estimates and cumulative hazard ratios indicate a persistent CEE-alone adverse effect on ovarian cancer incidence that emerged after 12-years follow-up and did not diminish (P = 0.006). In contrast, use of CEE plus MPA, versus placebo, did not increase ovarian cancer incidence (75 cases [0.051%] vs 63 [0.045%]; HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.82-1.59; P = 0.44) or ovarian cancer mortality (HR 1.21 95% CI 0.84-1.74). CEE plus MPA did significantly lower endometrial cancer incidence (106 cases [0.073%] vs 140 [0.10%]; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P = 0.01), without statistically significant influence on endometrial mortality (HR 0.58 95% CI 0.29-1.16) Conclusions: In randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial settings, CEE-alone, in women with prior hysterectomy, significantly increased ovarian cancer incidence and increased ovarian cancer mortality while CEE plus MPA, in women with a uterus, in contrast to most observational studies, did not. However, CEE plus MPA reduced endometrial cancer incidence. These findings inform decisions regarding menopausal hormone therapy use. Clinical trial information: NCT00000611 .

Background In the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trial, dietary intervention significantly reduced breast cancer mortality, especially in women with more metabolic syndrome (MetS) components. Therefore, this study investigated the associations of MetS and obesity with postmenopausal breast cancer after long‐term follow‐up in the WHI clinical trials. Methods A total of 68,132 postmenopausal women, without prior breast cancer and with normal mammogram, were entered into WHI randomized clinical trials; 63,330 women with an entry MetS score comprised the study population. At entry, body mass index (BMI) was determined; MetS score (0, 1–2, and 3–4) included the following: (1) high waist circumference (≥88 cm), (2) high blood pressure (systolic ≥130 mm Hg and/or diastolic ≥85 mm Hg, or hypertension history), (3) high‐cholesterol history, and (4) diabetes history. Study outcomes included breast cancer incidence, breast cancer mortality, deaths after breast cancer, and results by hormone receptor status. Results After a >20‐year mortality follow‐up, a higher MetS score (3–4), adjusted for BMI, was significantly associated with more poor prognosis, estrogen receptor (ER)–positive, progesterone receptor (PR)–negative cancers (p = .03), 53% more deaths after breast cancer (p < .001), and 44% higher breast cancer mortality (p = .03). Obesity status, adjusted for MetS score, was significantly associated with more good prognosis, ER‐positive, PR‐positive cancers (p < .001), more total breast cancers (p < .001), and more deaths after breast cancer (p < .001), with higher breast cancer mortality only in women with severe obesity (BMI, ≥35 kg/m²; p < .001). Conclusions MetS and obesity status have independent, but differential, adverse associations with breast cancer receptor subtypes and breast cancer mortality risk. Both represent separate targets for breast cancer prediction and prevention strategies.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause is a common, under-reported, and undertreated chronic progressive condition requiring long-term treatment. Hypoestrogenism in the urogenital tissues is associated with bothersome dyspareunia, vulvovaginal symptoms, overactive bladder, and frequent urinary tract infections. Vaginal hormone therapies, including vaginal estrogen and intravaginal dehydroepiandrostenedione, are safe and effective and improve symptoms and clinical findings. Systemic hormone therapy treats vulvovaginal atrophy less effectively than vaginal hormone therapies with increased stress and urge urinary incontinence. Oral ospemifene effectively treats vaginal dryness and dyspareunia. Clinicians need to ask about symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause, confirm the diagnosis, and suggest appropriate treatment options.

OBJECTIVE We use the person-centered Pathway to Treatment framework to assess the scope of evidence on disparities in endometrial cancer stage at diagnosis. This report is intended to facilitate interventions, research, and advocacy that reduce disparities. DATA SOURCES We completed a structured search of electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Included studies were published between January 2000 and 2023 and addressed marginalized population(s) in the United States with the ability to develop endometrial cancer and addressed variable(s) outlined in the Pathway to Treatment. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION Our database search strategy was designed for sensitivity to identify studies on disparate prolongation of the Pathway to Treatment for endometrial cancer, tallying 2,171. Inclusion criteria were broad, yet only 24 studies addressed this issue. All articles were independently screened by two reviewers. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Twenty-four studies were included: 10 on symptom appraisal, five on help seeking, five on diagnosis, and 10 on pretreatment intervals. Quality rankings were heterogeneous, between 3 and 9 (median 7.2) per the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. We identified three qualitative, two participatory, and two intervention studies. Studies on help seeking predominantly investigate patient-driven delays. When disease factors were controlled for, delays of the pretreatment interval were independently associated with racism toward Black and Hispanic people, less education, lower socioeconomic status, and nonprivate insurance. CONCLUSIONS Evidence gaps on disparities in timeliness of endometrial cancer care reveal emphasis of patient-driven help-seeking delays, reliance on health care–derived databases, underutilization of participatory methods, and a paucity of intervention studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION Given that PROSPERO was not accepting systematic scoping review protocols at the time this study began, this study protocol was shared a priori through Open Science Framework on January 13, 2021 (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/V2ZXY), and through peer review publication on April 13, 2021 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01649-x).