Andreas Van Barel’s research while affiliated with KU Leuven and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (5)


Determining N=(N0,…,NL)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\varvec{N} = (N_0, \ldots , N_L)$$\end{document}
Target g, control z and gradient ∇J(z)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\nabla J(z)$$\end{document}
CE and FE details. Problem 1 is marked by blue , Problem 2 by red (color figure online)
Performance of the MLQMC method compared with the MLMC method and their single level counterparts. The cost is expressed in equivalent finest level PDE solves
MSE contribution Vℓ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mathcal {V}_\ell $$\end{document} as a function of the number of QMC samples Nℓ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$N_\ell $$\end{document} used for each of the Rℓ=R=10\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$R_\ell =R=10$$\end{document} shifts. Shown is RℓVℓ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$R_\ell \mathcal {V}_\ell $$\end{document}, since this quantity does not depend on Rℓ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$R_\ell $$\end{document}. Lower lines correspond to finer levels, except in the case ℓ=0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\ell =0$$\end{document} for low N0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$N_0$$\end{document}
Multilevel quasi-Monte Carlo for optimization under uncertainty
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

July 2023

·

54 Reads

·

6 Citations

Numerische Mathematik

·

Andreas Van Barel

This paper considers the problem of optimizing the average tracking error for an elliptic partial differential equation with an uncertain lognormal diffusion coefficient. In particular, the application of the multilevel quasi-Monte Carlo (MLQMC) method to the estimation of the gradient is investigated, with a circulant embedding method used to sample the stochastic field. A novel regularity analysis of the adjoint variable is essential for the MLQMC estimation of the gradient in combination with the samples generated using the circulant embedding method. A rigorous cost and error analysis shows that a randomly shifted quasi-Monte Carlo method leads to a faster rate of decay in the root mean square error of the gradient than the ordinary Monte Carlo method, while considering multiple levels substantially reduces the computational effort. Numerical experiments confirm the improved rate of convergence and show that the MLQMC method outperforms the multilevel Monte Carlo method and single level quasi-Monte Carlo method.

View access options

Multilevel Quasi-Monte Carlo for Optimization under Uncertainty

September 2021

·

16 Reads

This paper considers the problem of optimizing the average tracking error for an elliptic partial differential equation with an uncertain lognormal diffusion coefficient. In particular, the application of the multilevel quasi-Monte Carlo (MLQMC) method to the estimation of the gradient is investigated, with a circulant embedding method used to sample the stochastic field. A novel regularity analysis of the adjoint variable is essential for the MLQMC estimation of the gradient in combination with the samples generated using the CE method. A rigorous cost and error analysis shows that a randomly shifted quasi-Monte Carlo method leads to a faster rate of decay in the root mean square error of the gradient than the ordinary Monte Carlo method, while considering multiple levels substantially reduces the computational effort. Numerical experiments confirm the improved rate of convergence and show that the MLQMC method outperforms the multilevel Monte Carlo method and the single level quasi-Monte Carlo method.



MG/OPT and MLMC for Robust Optimization of PDEs

May 2020

·

49 Reads

An algorithm is proposed to solve robust control problems constrained by partial differential equations with uncertain coefficients, based on the so-called MG/OPT framework. The levels in this MG/OPT hierarchy correspond to discretization levels of the PDE, as usual. For stochastic problems, the relevant quantities (such as the gradient) contain expected value operators on each of these levels. They are estimated using a multilevel Monte Carlo method, the specifics of which depend on the MG/OPT level. Each of the optimization levels then contains multiple underlying multilevel Monte Carlo levels. The MG/OPT hierarchy allows the algorithm to exploit the structure inherent in the PDE, speeding up the convergence to the optimum. In contrast, the multilevel Monte Carlo hierarchy exists to exploit structure present in the stochastic dimensions of the problem. A statement about the rate of convergence of the algorithm is proven, and some additional properties are discussed. The performance of the algorithm is numerically investigated for three test cases. A reduction in the number of samples required on expensive levels and therefore in computational time can be observed.


Robust Optimization of PDEs with Random Coefficients Using a Multilevel Monte Carlo Method

November 2017

·

68 Reads

·

43 Citations

SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification

This paper addresses optimization problems constrained by partial differential equations with uncertain coefficients. In particular, the robust control problem and the average control problem are considered for a tracking type cost functional with an additional penalty on the variance of the state. The expressions for the gradient and Hessian corresponding to either problem contain expected value operators. Due to the large number of uncertainties considered in our model, we suggest to evaluate these expectations using a multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) method. Under mild assumptions, it is shown that this results in the gradient and Hessian corresponding to the MLMC estimator of the original cost functional. Furthermore, we show that the use of certain correlated samples yields a reduction in the total number of samples required. Two optimization methods are investigated: the nonlinear conjugate gradient method and the Newton method. For both, a specific algorithm is provided that dynamically decides which and how many samples should be taken in each iteration. The cost of the optimization up to some specified tolerance τ\tau is shown to be proportional to the cost of a gradient evaluation with requested root mean square error τ\tau. The algorithms are tested on a model elliptic diffusion problem with lognormal diffusion coefficient. An additional nonlinear term is also considered.

Citations (3)


... The performance measures typically involve high-dimensional integrals over the space of uncertain parameters, resulting in computationally challenging problems. Strategies to reduce the computational burden include, for instance, (multilevel) Monte Carlo methods [27,30,39], (multilevel) quasi-Monte Carlo methods [14,18,24], sparse grids [4,20], and variants of the stochastic gradient descent algorithm [11,25]. We point out that quasi-Monte Carlo methods are particularly well-suited, since they retain the convexity structure of the optimal control problem while achieving faster convergence rates as compared to Monte Carlo methods. ...

Reference:

Quasi-Monte Carlo integration for feedback control under uncertainty
Multilevel quasi-Monte Carlo for optimization under uncertainty

Numerische Mathematik

... Recently, the PDE-constrained optimization community has devoted a significant amount of interest in developing numerical schemes for control problems with randomly perturbed coefficients. Many approaches employ an empirical approximation for the random integrands using either Monte-Carlo [22], Quasi-Monte Carlo [14], Multilevel Monte Carlo [35] or adaptive sparse grids [19,20] to obtain a deterministic PDE-constrained problem. The deterministic solvers employed in these (and related) papers are typically inexact Newton approaches, which allow for massive parallelization for the gradient and Hessian-vector products and avoid expensive matrix computations. ...

MG/OPT and Multilevel Monte Carlo for Robust Optimization of PDEs
  • Citing Article
  • July 2021

SIAM Journal on Optimization

... Mathematics Subject Classification 49J20 · 49J55 · 60F17 · 65C05 · 90C15 · 35R60 1 Introduction PDE-constrained optimization under uncertainty is a rapidly growing field with a number of recent contributions in theory [9,31,32,34], numerical and computational methods [17,18,30,59], and applications [7,8,11,49]. Nevertheless, a number of Dedication from T.M. Surowiec. ...

Robust Optimization of PDEs with Random Coefficients Using a Multilevel Monte Carlo Method
  • Citing Article
  • November 2017

SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification