March 2017
·
18 Reads
MedienJournal
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
March 2017
·
18 Reads
MedienJournal
February 2013
·
2,124 Reads
·
49 Citations
Journal of Children and Media
This article explores internet-related parent–child relationships across twenty-five European countries. Parent–child dyads are analysed in terms of parental mediation, digital competence, and communicative proximity, in order to answer the following research questions: Which types of parent–child relationship with respect to internet use can be found? How do they coincide with developmental, social, and cultural patterns? And how are they distributed across European Union countries? Using data from the EU Kids Online survey, four types of parent–child relationship were identified. The types are shaped by several factors on the level of child, family, and country, with the child's age and internet use being the most important predictors. Based on the prevalence of these family types, six country clusters were identified, which represent technical, social, and cultural contexts shaping the type of internet-related parent–child relationship.
January 2013
·
37 Reads
January 2013
·
4 Reads
Obwohl beinahe ein ‚altes‘ Medium, sind Strukturen und Inhalte des Fernsehens auch in aktuellen Debatten ein zentraler Gegenstand. Neue und veränderte Angebotsumgebungen (vgl. Hasebrink 2001), die Umstellungen der Empfangsebenen und vor allem soziodemografische Wandlungsprozesse bedürfen erhöhter Aufmerksamkeit und fragen nach angemessener Forschung (vgl. Paus-Hasebrink 2010). Neben Verschiebungen in der Altersstruktur (niedrigere Geburtenraten, höhere Lebenserwartung) oder soziökonomischen Differenzierungen (vgl. Paus-Hasebrink/Bichler 2008) fallen vor allem Veränderungen in den sozialen Beziehungsstrukturen (Alleinerzieherinnen und -erzieher sowie Patchworkfamilien statt bürgerlicher Kernfamilie; Flexibilität der Elternarbeitsplätze, zunehmende Berufstätigkeit von Müttern; veränderte Erziehungsstile) sowie hinsichtlich der lebensweltlichen Rahmenbedingungen (z.B. veränderten Wohn- und Lebenssituationen, Verhäuslichung der Kinder) und der gesellschaftlichen Wertegefüge als Momente für Veränderungen von Medienkommunikation auf (vgl. z.B. Paus-Haase 1998: 15f.; Kränzl-Nagl/Mierendorff 2007). Insgesamt geht der Trend unter anderem zu Individualisierung, zu mehr Selbstständigkeit bzw. mehr Eigeninitiative bei Kindern (vgl. Andresen/Hurrelmann 2010: 46), zu weniger Traditionsgepflogenheiten, aber auch mehr Multikulturalität sowie zur Kommerzialisierung der Alltagswelt; für die Entwicklung vom Kind zum Erwachsenen sind diese Aspekte von erheblicher Bedeutung (vgl. Paus-Haase 1998: 15f.).
July 2012
·
92 Reads
·
22 Citations
Drawing on sociological and psychological theoretical perspectives, this chapter elaborates on two research questions. How does parents' formal education influence children's internet use? And how does children's development by age interact with their family background in terms of an autonomous and competent use of the internet? The interrelation between these two processes, parental socialisation and development by age, helps us understand the interplay of children's activities in dealing with the internet and their parents' handling of that. The chapter first discusses the persistent importance of social inequality for information and communications technology (ICT) use in the industrialised countries. It then elaborates on a theoretical framework by discussing both children and parents' individual agency and how these are interlinked with respect to their societal status. Finally, based on the EU Kids Online dataset, it tests out the theoretical ideas and hypotheses and ask how parental socialisation shapes young people's online competences, and how children's development by age interacts with structural processes and dynamics of socialisation. Children with a lower socio-economic background agree that they know more about the internet than their parents, as these children might acquire internet skills often independently from their parents.
July 2012
·
1 Read
July 2012
·
5 Reads
·
12 Citations
Introduction Across Europe, economic restructuring and immigration from disadvantaged countries show that relations related to inequality are dynamic and persistent. Given the diversity of European countries, in social, cultural and economic terms, the gaps between rich and poor take various forms and occur to differing degrees. However, in all countries social inequalities are a major concern in social politics. Political economists point to the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion that continue to affect the communicative rights and competencies of considerable numbers of citizens (Murdock and Golding, 2004). Hence, the increasing emergence of a society that is mediated, experienced and encountered more and more through the internet is raising continuous questions about whether and how vulnerable families are getting the best out of the social, informational, educational and cultural opportunities of online technologies (Livingstone, 2009). The younger children are, the more parental education is required for them to use the internet safely and exploit its potentials. Since lower parental educational status often leads to less confidente parental mediation, we need to provide the resources for children to draw on to build competencies for using the internet and coping with online risks. As children get older, they achieve more unrestricted access to and use of the internet, and parents tend to refrain from intervening in their personal time and space (see, for example, Wang et al, 2005; Livingstone and Helsper, 2008; Bauwens et al, 2009). However, the degree of liberty children enjoy and how they deal with it is often the product of a particular family culture. Drawing on sociological and psychological theoretical perspectives, this chapter investigates two research questions: How does parents’ formal education influence children's internet use? How does children's development (by age) interact with their family background in terms of an autonomous and competent use of the internet? The interrelation between these two processes, that is, parental socialisation and development by age, helps us understand the interplay between children's activities in dealing with the internet and how their parents mediate this. Building on existing empirical work, first, we discuss the persistent importance of social inequality in information and communications technology (ICT) use in industrialised countries; second, we propose a theoretical framework that includes children and parents’ individual agency and how they are interlinked with respect to their societal status.
July 2012
·
5 Reads
January 2012
·
48 Reads
January 2012
·
11 Reads
... The well-known educational and competence gap comes into play (DIVSI, 2015, p. 17;Kutscher, 2014, pp. 105-106;Nikken and Opree, 2018, p. 1;Paus-Hasebrink, Ponte, Duerager, and Bauwens, 2012;Paus-Hasebrink, Kulterer, and Sinner, 2019). ...
July 2012
... Whereas restrictive mediation has a direct, negative effect on digital skills acquisition, enabling mediation is positively associated with deeper engagement with the internet (more time spent online and more online activities) and, therefore, has an indirect effect on digital skills . Prior research based on the EU Kids Online 2010 survey data showed a substantial negative correlation between the range of online activities and digital skills on the one hand, and restrictive mediation on the other (Paus-Hasebrink et al., 2012). By contrast, countries where children are encouraged to experience the internet on their own, and are actively supported by their parents when they encounter risks, score higher on the overall level of digital skills possessed by children. ...
July 2012
... Simultaneously, digital media and spaces potentially convey new risks and thus require media competency skills by young people (George and Odgers 2015;Strandell 2014). Accordingly, omnipresent mobile media devices and accompanying practices are particularly contested in school environments (Merchant 2012) and often questioned by parents and teachers alike (Paus-Hasebrink and Dürager 2009;Bond 2014). One of the risks children and adolescents increasingly have to face in their digitally connected lives is bullying, which occurs more and more in a variety of spaces and practices across both the digital and the offline sphere. ...
September 2009
... The available data concerning the parental mediation strategies in Austria before the pandemic showed a tendency toward either low levels of mediation in general or high levels of restrictive mediation at the expense of active mediation (Helsper et al., 2013;Paus-Hasebrink, Bauwens, Dürager, & Ponte, 2013). However, more recent data showed that these trends are changing, with parents displaying increasingly more interest in their children's online activities (Market Institut, 2019). ...
February 2013
Journal of Children and Media