Ananke Krishnan’s research while affiliated with University of Maryland, College Park and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Detailed analyses of a close encounter between two coyotes. Aprovides inter-individual distances between coyote individuals PEC068 and PEC088 in Ontario, Canada, over an ~ 8-month period in 2011–2012. When missing data necessitated interpolation of coyote positions, estimated inter-individual distances (± 95% CI as gray shading) are plotted. GPS tracking data indicate that the coyotes’ movements brought them within 66 m of each other on 26 May 2012 (shown as day 0). Band C plot range distributions (RDs) (± 95% CI) for the coyotes before and after this encounter, respectively, calculated as range distributions in the R package ctmm. Note the spatial changes by PEC068, reducing overlap with PEC088 after versus before the encounter (ΔAICc = 24.04). D reveals that the two coyotes’ home ranges were completely disjunct after the encounter as judged by the 95% contours of their respective RD. Furthermore, a region in the western part of PEC068’s original RD had the greatest increase in utilization after the encounter, whereas a region in the eastern part of PEC068’s original RD had the greatest decrease in utilization (D). E provides the proportional overlap (Bhattacharyya Coefficient ± 95% CI) between individuals based on their RDs before (purple) and after (orange) the real encounter (denoted by solid symbols and the dashed vertical line) compared with similar overlaps measured, for comparative purposes, for alternative ‘null-encounter’ dates when encounters did not occur (open symbols). F provides the proportional overlap within individuals for the same real and null encounters dates as in E, revealing the RD of PEC088 was almost completely static, whereas the RD of PEC068 showed a nonsignificant 15% decrease in overlap for the real encounter date. G gives each individual’s ballistic length scale (± 95% CI) calculated on a running basis for 60-day windows. Note that the ballistic length scale of PEC068 (whose RD changed following the encounter, decreasing inter-individual RD overlap) decreased by ~ 50% in the 60 days after the encounter whereas that of PEC088 increased by ~ 60%
Mean (± 95% CI) relative change in RD overlap between pairs of Canadian grizzly bears that encountered each other at distances < 100 m. The y-axis plots the ratio of the RD overlap after an encounter versus RD overlap before the encounter; thus, values less than 1 indicate decreases in pairwise overlap. Results are shown for all pairs of bears exhibiting an encounter, all late fall encounters (1 September–30 November), all late fall encounters involving different-sex pairs, and all late-fall encounters in which at least one individual was accompanied by cubs. Asterisks above the error bars indicate significant (**p < 0.05) changes in overlap
Mean (± 95% CI) relative change in RD overlap between pairs of Canadian grizzly bears for different definitions of what constitutes an encounter. The y-axis plots the ratio of the RD overlap after an encounter versus RD overlap before the encounter; thus, values less than 1 indicate decreases in pairwise overlap. Results in A are shown for all pairs exhibiting an encounter and all pairs involving an encounter in late fall (1 September – 30 November). B plots results for late fall encounters involving different-sex pairs and late fall encounters in which at least one individual was accompanied by cubs. Note that sample sizes in both panels depend on the definition of encounter distance. For late fall different sex encounters, no new encounters were identified after extending the radius from 400 to 500 m, so that duplicate result is not plotted. Asterisks above the error bars indicate marginally nonsignificant (*p < 0.1) and significant (**p < 0.05) changes in overlap
Intraspecific encounters can lead to reduced range overlap
  • Article
  • Full-text available

August 2024

·

238 Reads

·

1 Citation

Movement Ecology

·

Ananke Krishnan

·

Qianru Liao

·

[...]

·

Direct encounters, in which two or more individuals are physically close to one another, are a topic of increasing interest as more and better movement data become available. Recent progress, including the development of statistical tools for estimating robust measures of changes in animals’ space use over time, facilitates opportunities to link direct encounters between individuals with the long-term consequences of those encounters. Working with movement data for coyotes (Canis latrans) and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis), we investigate whether close intraspecific encounters were associated with spatial shifts in the animals’ range distributions, as might be expected if one or both of the individuals involved in an encounter were seeking to reduce or avoid conflict over space. We analyze the movement data of a pair of coyotes in detail, identifying how a change in home range overlap resulting from altered movement behavior was apparently a consequence of a close intraspecific encounter. With grizzly bear movement data, we approach the problem as population-level hypothesis tests of the spatial consequences of encounters. We find support for the hypotheses that (1) close intraspecific encounters between bears are, under certain circumstances, associated with subsequent changes in overlap between range distributions and (2) encounters defined at finer spatial scales are followed by greater changes in space use. Our results suggest that animals can undertake long-term, large-scale spatial changes in response to close intraspecific encounters that have the potential for conflict. Overall, we find that analyses of movement data in a pairwise context can (1) identify distances at which individuals’ proximity to one another may alter behavior and (2) facilitate testing of population-level hypotheses concerning the potential for direct encounters to alter individuals’ space use.

Download

Intraspecific encounters can induce home-range shifts

June 2023

·

165 Reads

Direct encounters, in which two or more individuals are physically close to one another, are a topic of increasing interest as more and better movement data become available. Recent progress, including the development of statistical tools for estimating robust measures of changes in animals’ space use over time, facilitates opportunities to link direct encounters between individuals with the long-term consequences of those encounters. Working with movement data for coyotes ( Canis latrans ) and grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos horribilis ), we investigate whether close intraspecific encounters were associated with spatial shifts in the animals’ range distributions, as might be expected if one or both of the individuals involved in an encounter were seeking to reduce or avoid conflict over space. We analyze the movement data of a pair of coyotes in detail, identifying how a shift in home range location resulting from altered movement behavior was apparently a consequence of a close intraspecific encounter. With grizzly bear movement data, we approach the problem from the perspective of a set of encounter pairs within a population. We find support for the hypotheses that 1) close intraspecific encounters between bears are, on average, associated with subsequent shifts in range distributions and 2) encounters defined at finer spatial scales are followed by greater changes in space use. Our results suggest that animals can undertake long-term, large-scale spatial shifts in response to close intraspecific encounters that have the potential for conflict. These results lend support for existing theory on the evolution of territories and space use (e.g., Maynard-Smith’s bourgeois strategy regarding low-conflict coexistence). Overall, we find that analyses of movement data in a pairwise context can 1) identify distances at which individuals’ proximity to one another may alter behavior and 2) facilitate testing of population-level hypotheses concerning the potential for direct encounters to alter individuals’ space use. Open Research Statement Movement data for the coyotes and grizzly bears are posted on Movebank.org as datasets 1614661371 and 1044288582, respectively. Statistical tools for estimating, manipulating, and comparing home ranges from movement data are implemented in the open-source R package ctmm . R scripts used to carry out specific analyses for this study are openly available on GitHub at https://github.com/anagkrish/encounter_homerangeshift .

Citations (1)


... Distinguishing the conditions under which reactions are Poissonian, and motility and reactivity effects can be discriminated is important in applications. When the reaction-diffusion process represents the encounter between trajectories of two moving organisms, quantifying interactions in terms of stationary distributions of individual space use facilitates its statistical estimation [52], as well as upscaling the interaction rates to understand how they affect processes such as competition or disease spread [23,53]. Our theory defines the conditions in which this substitution is possible. ...

Reference:

The structure of inter-reaction times in reaction-diffusion processes and consequences for counting statistics
Intraspecific encounters can lead to reduced range overlap

Movement Ecology