Allyson E. French’s research while affiliated with Louisiana State University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Stick figures represent the different starting body orientations and arm positions (UPRIGHT or INVERTED with the arm UP or DOWN). Curved arrows show the direction of movement and the corresponding final shoulder-fingertip lines for LIGHT (gray dashed lines) and DARK (black solid lines) visual conditions and final fingertip locations (symbols) for REAL trials for one subject—circles for UPRIGHT and triangles for INVERTED body orientations. Distance scales are for final position data only
Several interactions are plotted for mean endpoint error. a Average values are shown for LIGHT (gray) and DARK (black) visual conditions for UPRIGHT and INVERTED body orientations (ORIENT × VIS). b Average values are shown for LIGHT and DARK visual conditions for Near, Middle, and Far targets (TARG × VIS). c Average values are shown for UPRIGHT (open symbols) and INVERTED (filled symbols) body orientations for Near, Middle, and Far targets (ORIENT × TARG). Each asterisk represents a significant difference between visual conditions for the given body orientation (a) or target location (b) or between body orientations for the given target location (c). Dotted lines represent a significant difference between corresponding means at the line’s end (P < .05). Error bars represent the corresponding within-subject confidence interval
Mean values for the primary and secondary variables are plotted for LIGHT (gray) and DARK (black) visual conditions, DOWN (solid bars) and UP (open bars) starting arm positions, Near, Middle, and Far targets, and UPRIGHT and INVERTED body orientations. Graphs represent mean endpoint error (a), variable error (b), displacement (c), movement time (d), the ratio of acceleration to deceleration times (e), peak velocity (f), peak acceleration (g), and peak deceleration (h)
Average elevation angle trajectories adjusted for mean final elevation angle of REAL trials for each target level for different subjects are plotted over the fitted regions beginning at peak velocity minus 50 ms (a) . Thin lines represent the actual mean trajectories, while thick lines represent the fitted trajectories for a given visual condition and body orientation for critical-damping (INDEX = .95, 1.02, and .93 for Near, Middle, and Far targets, respectively), for under-damping (INDEX = .61, .73, and .85), and for over-damping (INDEX = 1.86, 1.43, 1.21). Across subject average values ±1 standard error of INDEX (b) and mean error (c) for Near (triangles), Middle (squares), and Far (circles) targets are plotted for REAL (open symbols), LIGHT (gray symbols), and DARK (black symbols) visual conditions
Mean errors are plotted against damping index—INDEX for each target (Near—triangles, Middle—squares, and Far—circles), body orientation, starting arm position, LIGHT (gray) and DARK (black) visual conditions, and subject. The horizontal dashed line represents zero error, while the vertical dashed line represents an INDEX = 1, an indication of critically damped behavior
Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

June 2016

·

76 Reads

·

17 Citations

Experimental Brain Research

·

Chelsea M Soebbing

·

Allyson E French

·

Upright people making goal-directed movements in dark environments often vertically undershoot remembered target locations when compared to performances in illuminated environments. In this study, we wanted to determine whether influences of the gravitational pull and/or type of muscle activation could explain differences in vertical endpoint precision between movements to visually remembered target locations with and without allocentric cues available. We also used a simple damping model for movement trajectories to describe potential differences in behavior between visual conditions. Subjects performed straight arm pointing movements to REAL target locations or remembered target locations in darkness (DARK) or normal room lighting (LIGHT). Performances were made from UPRIGHT and INVERTED (upside down) body orientations. Starting arm position (UP by the ear; DOWN on the thigh) also varied so that eccentric or concentric muscle contractions for arm flexion or extension movements occurred primarily along the earth-fixed vertical either with or against the gravitational pull. Effects of visual condition (LIGHT, DARK), body orientation (UPRIGHT, INVERTED), starting arm position (UP, DOWN), and target level (Near, Middle, Far) on elevation endpoint errors revealed that subject's errors in the DARK were more negative than those in the LIGHT. Errors correlated well with movement displacement to reveal the common vertical undershooting bias in darkness exacerbated by inverting the body or requiring greater movement excursions. Although influences of gravitational pull and muscle activation type could not explain differences between visual conditions, modeling revealed critically damped behavior in the DARK and under-damped behavior in the LIGHT to indicate muscle energy dissipation without vision.

View access options

Citations (1)


... Empirical evidence from both kinematic and electromyographic studies has unequivocally demonstrated that the CNS strategically leverages the influence of gravity to minimize muscular effort during vertical movements. Specifically, kinematic analyses have unveiled distinct velocity profiles within the sagittal vertical plane, which differ depending on the direction of motion (Gentili et al., 2007;Le Seac'h & McIntyre, 2007;Crevecoeur et al., 2009;Gaveau et al., , 2014Gaveau et al., , 2016Gaveau et al., , 2021Yamamoto & Kushiro, 2014;Hondzinski et al., 2016;Yamamoto et al., 2019;Poirier et al., 2020Poirier et al., , 2022. These observations were made during single-joint movements of the upper limb -thus specifically isolating gravitational effects -as well as during multi-joint arm movements (Papaxanthis et al., 2005;Yamamoto & Kushiro, 2014) and even during whole body movements (Papaxanthis et al., 2003). ...

Reference:

Feedback-driven adaptation of gravity-related sensorimotor control to an upside-down posture
Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions

Experimental Brain Research