Allison G. Harvey’s research while affiliated with University of California and other places

Background Eveningness chronotype—the tendency for later sleep and wake times—arises from a confluence of psychosocial, behavioral, and biological factors. With the onset and progression of puberty, many young people develop an eveningness chronotype, which remains prevalent through the transition into adulthood. Eveningness has been associated with increased risk for poorer health. While eveningness is modifiable, maintaining the necessary behavior changes can be challenging. The science on habits demonstrates that habit formation is a key mechanism for maintaining behavior change over time. Learning theory offers schedules of reinforcement that also hold promise for enhancing the maintenance of behavior change. The present study will evaluate the Habit-based Sleep Health Intervention (HABITs)—which combines the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) with the science of habits—and a text message intervention informed by learning theory to attempt to sustainably modify the contributors to eveningness among young adults (18–30 years of age). Methods Participants (N = 160) will be randomly allocated to HABITs and HABITs + Texts. Both interventions include HABITs which involves three 50-min sessions followed by six 30-min sessions. Alongside the latter six sessions, HABITs + Texts will concurrently receive the text message intervention. Aims 1–3 will compare HABITs + Texts to HABITs on improvements in the outcomes of (1) utilization of sleep health behaviors and habit formation, (2) sleep and circadian functioning, and (3) functioning in five health-relevant domains, in the short (post-treatment) and longer (6-month and 12-month follow-up) term. Exploratory analysis will (1) compare HABITs and HABITs + Texts on (a) if sleep health behavior habit formation mediates the effects of intervention on improvement in outcomes and (b) if intervention effects are moderated by select variables, and (2) to evaluate if HABITs (regardless of the text message intervention) is associated with an improvement in outcomes in the short and longer term. Discussion This study has the potential to advance knowledge on (1) the value of leveraging the science of habits and learning theory in behavior change interventions, (2) the use of a low-cost and efficient intervention for habit formation and maintenance, (3) interventions that address eveningness chronotype, and (4) processes related to behavior change during emerging adulthood. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05167695. Registered on December 22, 2021.

Study objectives: To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a Sleep Promotion Program (SPP). Methods: This pilot trial randomized adolescents (13-15y) with insufficient sleep duration and irregular sleep timing to SPP-continuation (n=24; SPP in month 1, continuation treatment in month 2) or monitoring-SPP (n=20; monitoring in month 1, SPP in month 2). SPP included one clinician session and at-home delivery of web-based reports of each youth's sleep diary data with accompanying intervention questions that prompt youth to engage in sleep behavior change. Attrition rate primarily measured feasibility. Program satisfaction measured acceptability. Total sleep time (TST), sleep timing, and sleep timing regularity were measured via sleep diary at baseline, follow-up 1, and follow-up 2 (each ∼1 month apart). Linear mixed effects models compared treatment arms on changes in sleep from baseline to follow-up 1 (month 1). We also compared changes in sleep during month 1 to changes in sleep during month 2 among SPP-continuation participants. Results: Attrition rate was 8.5%. 96.5% participants rated the quality of care received as good or excellent. In month 1, SPP-continuation youth showed a significantly greater increase in mean TST than monitoring-SPP youth (0.57 vs. -0.38 hours; contrast=0.95; CI=0.14, 1.76, p=0.024). SPP-continuation participants showed an increase in TST during month 1 (0.51h) but a decrease during month 2 (-0.74 h; contrast=-1.24, CI=-2.06, -0.42, p=0.005). No other significant effects were observed. Conclusions: SPP is highly feasible, acceptable, and associated with a significant increase in TST early in treatment. Clinical trial registration: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Targeted Intervention for Insufficient Sleep among Typically-Developing Adolescents; Identifier: NCT04163003; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04163003.

Background Poor memory for treatment is associated with poorer treatment adherence and poorer patient outcomes. The memory support intervention (MSI) was developed to improve patient memory for treatment with the goal of improving patient outcomes. The aim of this study protocol is to conduct a confirmatory efficacy trial to test whether a new, streamlined, and potent version of the MSI improves outcomes for midlife and older adults. This streamlined MSI is comprised of constructive memory supports that will be applied to a broader range of treatment content. The platform for this study is the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C). We will focus on midlife and older adults who are low income and experiencing mobility impairments. Methods Participants (N = 178) will be randomly allocated to TranS-C + MSI or TranS-C alone. Both intervention arms include eight 50-min weekly sessions. Assessments will be conducted at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 6-, and 12-month follow-up (6FU and 12FU). Aim 1 will compare the effects of TranS-C + MSI versus TranS-C alone on sleep and circadian functioning, daytime functioning, well-being, and patient memory. Aim 2 will test whether patient memory for treatment mediates the relationship between treatment condition and patient outcomes. Aim 3 will evaluate if previously reported poor treatment response subgroups will moderate the relationship between treatment condition and (a) patient memory for treatment and (b) treatment outcome. Exploratory analyses will compare treatment condition on (a) patient adherence, patient-rated treatment credibility, and patient utilization of treatment contents, and (b) provider-rated acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Discussion This study has the potential to provide evidence for (a) the efficacy of a new simplified version of the MSI for maintaining health, well-being, and functioning, (b) the wider application of the MSI for midlife and older adults and to the treatment of sleep and circadian problems, and (c) the efficacy of the MSI for sub-groups who are likely to benefit from the intervention. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05986604. Registered on 2 August 2023.

Community mental health centers (CMHCs) offer invaluable, publicly-funded treatment for serious mental illness (SMI). Unfortunately, evidence-based psychological treatments are often not delivered at CMHCs, in part due to implementation barriers, such as limited time, high caseloads, and complex clinical presentations. Transdiagnostic treatments may help address these barriers, because they allow providers to treat symptoms across multiple disorders concurrently. However, little research has investigated CMHC providers’ experiences of delivering transdiagnostic treatments “on the ground,” particularly for adults with SMI. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess CMHC providers’ perspectives on delivering a transdiagnostic treatment – the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) – to adults diagnosed with SMI. In the context of a larger parent trial, providers were randomized to deliver a standard version of TranS-C (Standard TranS-C) or a version adapted to the CMHC context (Adapted TranS-C). Twenty-five providers from the parent trial participated in a semi-structured interview (n = 10 Standard TranS-C; n = 15 from Adapted TranS-C). Responses were deductively and inductively coded to identify themes related to Proctor’s taxonomy of implementation outcomes. Four novel “transdiagnostic take homes” were identified: (1) transdiagnostic targets, such as sleep, can be perceived as motivating and appropriate when treating SMI, (2) strategies to bolster client motivation/adherence and address a wider range of symptom severity may improve transdiagnostic treatments, (3) balancing feasibility with offering in-depth resources is an important challenge for transdiagnostic treatment development, and (4) adapting transdiagnostic treatments to the CMHC context may improve provider perceptions of implementation outcomes.

Objectives: Study objectives were to: 1) iteratively adapt the Transdiagnostic Sleep and Circadian Intervention (TranS-C) for patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR; Phase 1) and 2) conduct a preliminary single group pre-post intervention test to a) evaluate procedural feasibility and intervention acceptability and b) to explore preliminary pre-post changes in self-reported sleep, disability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Phase 2). Method: In Phase 1, 12 individuals in CR and six content experts completed interviews to inform TranS-C adaptations. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. In Phase 2, eight individuals in CR completed a baseline assessment, the adapted TranS-C intervention, and a post-intervention assessment. Intervention acceptability was assessed via questionnaire and interview. Sleep, disability, and HRQoL outcomes were assessed using questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative measures; interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Results: Phase 1 participants were receptive to the premise and structure of the adapted intervention. In Phase 2, participants endorsed positive attitudes toward the intervention. Seven of eight participants demonstrated improvements in sleep outcomes. Disability and HRQoL results did not consistently improve. Conclusion: The adapted TranS-C intervention was acceptable to CR patients and could yield improvements in subjective sleep outcomes. Larger-scale testing in CR is warranted.

Study Objectives This single-arm, mixed-methods, pilot study examined the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an adapted version of the transdiagnostic intervention for sleep and circadian dysfunction (TranS-C) on multidimensional sleep health (MDSH) in a sample of adults with excess weight and suboptimal sleep health. Methods Participants received up to eight, weekly, remotely delivered, tailored TranS-C sessions. At pre- and post-intervention, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and 7 days of Fitbit data were used to evaluate changes in sleep dimensions (regularity, alertness, timing, satisfaction, duration, and efficiency) and the composite MDSH score. Study feasibility examined recruitment, data collection, and intervention engagement (completion of core TranS-C sessions). Acceptability of the intervention was assessed with semi-structured interviews, which were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results From 85 referrals, 11 individuals were eligible, and 10 completed the study. All intervention participants completed the measures needed to calculate their composite MDSH score and completed the core intervention sessions. Themes from interviews support the intervention’s remote delivery approach, applicability of the information provided, and impact on self-reported health. The intervention resulted in a large improvement in the mean composite MDSH score (Cohen’s d = 1.17). Small-to-large effects were also observed for individual sleep health dimensions except for timing. Conclusions Adapted TranS-C is acceptable for adults with excess weight and suboptimal sleep health and may be effective at improving short-term MDSH. With changes to recruitment methods, a larger study is feasible. Limitations include the small sample size and the lack of a control condition.

Introduction Adolescent sleep is compressed by early school start times and often competes with school, extracurricular, and social demands. Insufficient and mistimed weeknight sleep contributes to large shifts in weekend-weekday sleep-wake schedules, which may lead to adverse physical and mental health outcomes. The Sleep Promotion Program (SPP) is a brief, scalable, behavioral intervention that aims to increase sleep duration and regularity while building motivation and efficacy to change sleep behaviors. This secondary analysis tested whether the SPP changed actigraphy-assessed sleep. Methods Participants (ages 13-15) with insufficient and irregular sleep (N=44) were randomized to the SPP intervention (n=24) or waitlist control (n=20). The SPP included sleep psychoeducation and a face-to-face clinician session, relying on evidence-based strategies for promoting sleep within a motivational interviewing framework. Participants wore an ActiWatch during their baseline and follow-up which occurred after the intervention or the waitlist period. We hypothesized participants randomized to SPP would lengthen and stabilize sleep from baseline to follow-up compared to controls. We tested a group (intervention vs. waitlist) by time (baseline vs. follow-up) interaction on actigraphy-assessed sleep duration, timing, and regularity (weekend-weekday shift in timing) using multilevel models with a random intercept. Results We included 38 participants with at least 4 weekday nights and 1 weekend night of actigraphy (n=23 intervention, n=15 waitlist). The intervention group delayed their weeknight bedtimes (~45 minutes; b=0.69, SE=0.27, p=0.01), delayed their weeknight waketimes (~1 hour; b=0.68, SE=0.32, p=0.03), and simultaneously decreased the difference between weekend-weekday bedtimes (b=-1.1, SE=0.5, p=0.04) compared to controls (i.e., increased regularity). Weekend sleep timing and total sleep time did not change significantly. Conclusion The SPP intervention regularized weekend-weekday sleep timing in adolescents with insufficient and irregular sleep, likely driven by delaying weeknight sleep times. Given that this study was primarily conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, when many participants reported delayed school start times, participants randomized to SPP were able to regularize their weekend-weekday sleep schedules while simultaneously adapting their weeknight sleep schedules to better fit their preferred timing. Regularizing sleep may be an attainable first step to improving sleep in adolescents. Future work will examine whether sleep regularization associates with mental health outcomes. Support (if any) K23HD087433, Pittsburgh CTSI