Alessandra Esposito’s research while affiliated with Telethon Institute Of Genetics And Medicine and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (16)


Fig. 1: In vitro reconstitution and mTORC1 kinase activity on membrane a, cartoon showing the in vitro membrane system for testing mTORC1 kinase activity. Nterminal 6xHis tag of Lamtor1 interacts with DGS-NTA(Ni) and Cys 181 of Rheb interacts with PE-MCC. b, Screening of components in mTORC1 activation. Western blot is done by antiphospho-4EBP1 (Thr37/46). The quantification is shown with 3 repeats.
Fig. 2: cryo-EM structure of mTORC1-Rheb-Rag-Ragulator-4EBP1 on membrane a, Representative cryo-EM images showing protein-decorated liposomes. b, Representative 2D averages showing side and top views of the protein-membrane complex. c, A composite cryo-EM density map of mTORC1-Rheb-Rag-Ragulator-4EBP1 on membrane, assembled from two focused-refinement maps (mTOR-Rheb-mLST8 and Raptor-Rag-Ragulator), overlaid with the unsharpened cryo-EM map from the overall refinement with C2 symmetry. The active sites of mTOR are labeled with dashed arrows. The twofold axis is labeled as an oval symbol in the top view. Different contour levels were used for optimal visualization using UCSF ChimeraX. d, Atomic model of mTORC1-Rheb-Rag-Ragulator-4EBP1 is overlaid with the unsharpened cryo-EM map from the overall refinement with C2 symmetry. e, Close-up view of the density for inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6) and surrounding Lysin/Arginine cluster. f, Close-up view of the density for the 4EBP1 TOS motif. Scale bars in (a) and (b) represent 20 nm.
Fig. 5: A model of mTORC1 recruitment and activation on the lysosomal membrane The average distances between the protein and membrane are indicated by black arrows. The linkers that anchor Lamtor1 and Rheb to membranes are arbitrary. The gray arrows indicate the most possible extended positions relative to the membrane surface. The insect shows the ATP binding site of mTORC1 in the apo and active states.
Structural basis for growth factor and nutrient signal integration on the lysosomal membrane by mTORC1
  • Preprint
  • File available

November 2024

·

47 Reads

Zhicheng Cui

·

Alessandra Esposito

·

Gennaro Napolitano

·

[...]

·

James H. Hurley

Mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), which consists of mTOR, Raptor, and mLST8, receives signaling inputs from growth factor signals and nutrients. These signals are mediated by the Rheb and Rag small GTPases, respectively, which activate mTORC1 on the cytosolic face of the lysosome membrane. We biochemically reconstituted the activation of mTORC1 on membranes by physiological submicromolar concentrations of Rheb, Rags, and Ragulator. We determined the cryo-EM structure and found that Raptor and mTOR directly interact with the membrane at anchor points separated by up to 230 Å across the membrane surface. Full engagement of the membrane anchors is required for maximal activation, which is brought about by alignment of the catalytic residues in the mTOR kinase active site. The observations show at the molecular and atomic scale how converging signals from growth factors and nutrients drive mTORC1 recruitment to and activation on the lysosomal membrane in a three-step process, consisting of (1) Rag-Ragulator-driven recruitment to within ∼100 Å of the lysosomal membrane, (2) Rheb-driven recruitment to within ∼40 Å, and finally (3) direct engagement of mTOR and Raptor with the membrane. The combination of Rheb and membrane engagement leads to full catalytic activation, providing a structural explanation for growth factor and nutrient signal integration at the lysosome.

Download

A SPLICS reporter reveals αα{{{{{\boldsymbol{\alpha }}}}}}-synuclein regulation of lysosome-mitochondria contacts which affects TFEB nuclear translocation

February 2024

·

189 Reads

·

2 Citations

Mitochondrial and lysosomal activities are crucial to maintain cellular homeostasis: optimal coordination is achieved at their membrane contact sites where distinct protein machineries regulate organelle network dynamics, ions and metabolites exchange. Here we describe a genetically encoded SPLICS reporter for short- and long- juxtapositions between mitochondria and lysosomes. We report the existence of narrow and wide lysosome-mitochondria contacts differently modulated by mitophagy, autophagy and genetic manipulation of tethering factors. The overexpression of α-synuclein (α-syn) reduces the apposition of mitochondria/lysosomes membranes and affects their privileged Ca²⁺ transfer, impinging on TFEB nuclear translocation. We observe enhanced TFEB nuclear translocation in α-syn-overexpressing cells. We propose that α-syn, by interfering with mitochondria/lysosomes tethering impacts on local Ca²⁺ regulated pathways, among which TFEB mediated signaling, and in turn mitochondrial and lysosomal function. Defects in mitochondria and lysosome represent a common hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases: targeting their communication could open therapeutic avenues.


TFEB and TFE3 control glucose homeostasis by regulating insulin gene expression

September 2023

·

68 Reads

·

5 Citations

The EMBO Journal

To fulfill their function, pancreatic beta cells require precise nutrient‐sensing mechanisms that control insulin production. Transcription factor EB (TFEB) and its homolog TFE3 have emerged as crucial regulators of the adaptive response of cell metabolism to environmental cues. Here, we show that TFEB and TFE3 regulate beta‐cell function and insulin gene expression in response to variations in nutrient availability. We found that nutrient deprivation in beta cells promoted TFEB/TFE3 activation, which resulted in suppression of insulin gene expression. TFEB overexpression was sufficient to inhibit insulin transcription, whereas beta cells depleted of both TFEB and TFE3 failed to suppress insulin gene expression in response to amino acid deprivation. Interestingly, ChIP‐seq analysis showed binding of TFEB to super‐enhancer regions that regulate insulin transcription. Conditional, beta‐cell‐specific, Tfeb ‐overexpressing, and Tfeb / Tfe3 double‐KO mice showed severe alteration of insulin transcription, secretion, and glucose tolerance, indicating that TFEB and TFE3 are important physiological mediators of pancreatic function. Our findings reveal a nutrient‐controlled transcriptional mechanism that regulates insulin production, thus playing a key role in glucose homeostasis at both cellular and organismal levels.


Loss of the batten disease protein CLN3 leads to mis-trafficking of M6PR and defective autophagic-lysosomal reformation

July 2023

·

254 Reads

·

24 Citations

Batten disease, one of the most devastating types of neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disorders, is caused by mutations in CLN3. Here, we show that CLN3 is a vesicular trafficking hub connecting the Golgi and lysosome compartments. Proteomic analysis reveals that CLN3 interacts with several endo-lysosomal trafficking proteins, including the cation-independent mannose 6 phosphate receptor (CI-M6PR), which coordinates the targeting of lysosomal enzymes to lysosomes. CLN3 depletion results in mis-trafficking of CI-M6PR, mis-sorting of lysosomal enzymes, and defective autophagic lysosomal reformation. Conversely, CLN3 overexpression promotes the formation of multiple lysosomal tubules, which are autophagy and CI-M6PR-dependent, generating newly formed proto-lysosomes. Together, our findings reveal that CLN3 functions as a link between the M6P-dependent trafficking of lysosomal enzymes and lysosomal reformation pathway, explaining the global impairment of lysosomal function in Batten disease.



Reconstitution and structure of the Raptor–TFEB–Rag–Ragulator complex
a, Size-exclusion chromatography and SDS–PAGE of assembled Raptor–TFEB–Rag–Ragulator complex. Peak-1 corresponds to the fully assembled complex, and peak-2 represents Ragulator alone. All the corresponding bands are labelled, the asterisk indicates HSP70 contamination. MW, molecular weight; A280, absorbance at 280 nm. b, Domain arrangement of all the subunits in the complex. Unresolved domains are indicated by dashed lines. c, A composite cryo-EM density map of the complex, assembled from three focused-refinement maps (Raptor, c-RagAGTP/RagCGDP–Ragulator and TFEB-nc–RagAGTP/RagCGDP–Ragulator). Different contour levels were used for optimal visualization using UCSF ChimeraX⁴⁶. c, canonical; nc, non-canonical.
TFEB interacts with both nc-Rag GTPases and Raptor
a, Overall interaction between TFEB and nc-Rag GTPases is shown as ribbon models from the front view. nc-Ragulator is shown as transparent surfaces. Disordered switches I and II of nc-RagCGDP are shown with dashed lines. b, Interactions between TFEB and inter-Rag G domains at the dimer interface. c, Close-up view of the interaction between TFEB N terminus and α8 of RagCGDP. Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges are labelled and indicated with black and grey dashed lines, respectively. d, Close-up view of the interaction between TFEB and outer-G domain of RagAGTP as outlined in a. e, Ribbon model showing the interactions among TFEB, Raptor and nc-RagAGTP. TFEB bridges the interaction between Raptor and nc-RagAGTP through its Pro-rich loop and α2 region. f, 90°-rotated view of e shows the interaction between the Pro-rich loop of TFEB and RNC domain. g, Close-up view of the interaction between RNC domain and nc-RagAGTP. Ordered switch I of nc-RagAGTP facilitates its interaction with the RNC domain. h, Close-up view as outlined in f shows the residues responsible for the interaction between ⁵⁰TPAI⁵³ of TFEB and RNC domain. Raptor residues that interact with the RAIP motif of 4E-BP1 are highlighted with boxes³³.
Function of the TFEB-nc-Rag GTPases interface
a, Cells expressing wild-type (WT) or mutant TFEB-GFP were analysed using immunofluorescence to determine the percentage of cells showing nuclear TFEB, shown as mean ± s.e. throughout; n = 12 independent fields per condition. b, Immunoblot of HeLa cells expressing wild-type or mutant TFEB-GFP. c, Representative co-immunoprecipitation of Flp-In 293 T-REx cells transfected with wild-type or mutant TFEB-GFP. d, Microscopy analysis of Torin1-treated HeLa cells, n ≥ 5 independent fields per condition. ***P ≤ 0.0001 throughout. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. e, Representative co-immunoprecipitation of HeLa RagC KO cells transfected with the indicated constructs. f, Immunoblot of RagC KO HeLa cells transfected with empty vector or wild-type RagC or RagC(D294R). Cells were amino acid starved and refed in the presence or absence of 250 nM Torin1. g, Representative co-immunoprecipitation of HeLa RagA KO cells transfected with the indicated constructs. h, Immunoblot of RagA KO HeLa cells transfected with empty vector or wild-type RagA or RagA(H104D/Q107R/E111R). i–k, Cells as in f were analysed using immunofluorescence and the percentage of the cells were determined to show nuclear TFEB (i) (n = 5 fields per condition); TFEB–RagC colocalization (j) (n ≥ 5 fields per condition, ***P ≤ 0.0001, unpaired t-test) and mTOR–RagC colocalization (k) (n ≥ 12 fields per condition, unpaired t-test). l–n, Cells as in h were analysed using immunofluorescence and quantified to calculate the percentage of the cells showing nuclear TFEB (l) (n ≥ 4 independent fields per condition), TFEB–RagA colocalization (m) (n ≥ 4 fields per condition, **P ≤ 0.002, unpaired t-test) and mTOR–RagA colocalization (n) (n = 5 independent fields per condition, unpaired t-test). Scale bar, 10 μm. NS, not significant; aa, amino acid; Ctrl, control; HA, haemagglutinin; IP, immunoprecipitation; GST, glutathione S-transferase.
Function of the nc-Ragulator and c-RagCGDP interface
a, Cartoon representation that highlights the interacting subunits at the end with nc-Ragulator. b, Close-up view as outlined in a shows the residues responsible for the interaction between nc-Lamtor1 and c-RagCGDP. c, Representative immunoblot of RagC KO HeLa cells transfected with empty vector or wild-type RagC or RagC mutants (Y150, Y150/R198D or Y150/M151/R198D). Cells were amino acid starved and refed in the presence or absence of 250 nM Torin1. Quantifications are shown with mean ± s.e. throughout; n = 2 experiments. d, Representative co-immunoprecipitation of HeLa RagC KO cells transfected with the indicated constructs; n = 3 experiments. e–g, Cells as in c were analysed using immunofluorescence and quantified to calculate the percentage of the cells showing nuclear TFEB (e) (n = 5 independent fields per condition); TFEB–RagC colocalization (f) (n ≥ 5 independent fields per condition, ***P ≤ 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test) and mTOR–RagC colocalization (g) (n ≥ 8 independent fields per condition; NS, not significant; one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). Scale bar, 10 μm.
Structure of the mTORC1–TFEB–Rag–Ragulator megacomplex
a, Composite cryo-EM density map of the dimeric mTORC1–TFEB–Rag–Ragulator megacomplex shown from top and side views. The active sites of mTOR are labelled with dashed arrows. The twofold axis is labelled as an oval symbol in the top view and a dash line in the side view. Different contour levels were used for optimal visualization using UCSF ChimeraX⁴⁶. b, Atomic model of the dimeric megacomplex shown in the same orientation as in a. c, The ribbon model of an asymmetric unit. The domain organization of mTOR is shown. d, Focused view of the active site of mTOR, the HEAT and FAT domains are omitted for clarity. The ATP binding site is outlined with a dashed line. The distance between Pro⁶⁶ of TFEB and Lys²¹⁶⁶ of mTOR is drawn with a double-headed arrow. The distance between Ile¹⁰⁸ of TFEB and the active site of mTOR is calculated on the basis of the distance between Ile¹⁰⁸ of TFEB and Asp²³³⁸ of mTOR. The inset highlights the distance between TFEB and the hinge loop (residues 2115–2118) at the end of mTOR FRB domain. Distances are calculated on the basis of the Cα atoms.
Structure of the lysosomal mTORC1–TFEB–Rag–Ragulator megacomplex

January 2023

·

113 Reads

·

99 Citations

Nature

The transcription factor TFEB is a master regulator of lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy¹. The phosphorylation of TFEB by the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1)2–5 is unique in its mTORC1 substrate recruitment mechanism, which is strictly dependent on the amino acid-mediated activation of the RagC GTPase activating protein FLCN6,7. TFEB lacks the TOR signalling motif responsible for the recruitment of other mTORC1 substrates. We used cryogenic-electron microscopy to determine the structure of TFEB as presented to mTORC1 for phosphorylation, which we refer to as the ‘megacomplex’. Two full Rag–Ragulator complexes present each molecule of TFEB to the mTOR active site. One Rag–Ragulator complex is bound to Raptor in the canonical mode seen previously in the absence of TFEB. A second Rag–Ragulator complex (non-canonical) docks onto the first through a RagC GDP-dependent contact with the second Ragulator complex. The non-canonical Rag dimer binds the first helix of TFEB with a RagCGDP-dependent aspartate clamp in the cleft between the Rag G domains. In cellulo mutation of the clamp drives TFEB constitutively into the nucleus while having no effect on mTORC1 localization. The remainder of the 108-amino acid TFEB docking domain winds around Raptor and then back to RagA. The double use of RagC GDP contacts in both Rag dimers explains the strong dependence of TFEB phosphorylation on FLCN and the RagC GDP state.



Fig. 5 Architecture of the mTORC1-TFEB-Rag-Ragulator megacomplex a, Composite cryo-EM density map of the dimeric mTORC1-TFEB-Rag-Ragulator megacomplex shown from top and side views. The active sites of mTOR are labeled with dash arrows. The twofold axis is labeled as an oval symbol in the top view and a dash line in the side view. b, Atomic model of the dimeric megacomplex shown in the same orientation as in (a). c, The ribbon model of an asymmetric unit. The domain organization of mTOR is shown. d, Focused view of the active site of mTOR, the HEAT and FAT domains are omitted for clarity. The ATP binding site is outlined with a dash line. The distance between Cα atoms of Pro 66 of TFEB and Lys 2166 of mTOR is drawn with a double-headed arrow. The distance between Ile108 of TFEB and the active site of mTOR is calculated based on the distance between Cα atoms of Ile 108 of TFEB and Asp 2338 of mTOR. The inset highlights the close contact between TFEB and the hinge loop (residues 2115-2118) at the end of mTOR FRB domain. Distances are calculated based on the Cα atoms.
Structural basis for mTORC1-dependent regulation of the lysosomal and autophagic transcription factor TFEB

September 2022

·

126 Reads

The transcription factor TFEB is a master regulator of lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy. The phosphorylation of TFEB by the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is unique in its mTORC1 substrate recruitment mechanism, which is strictly dependent on the amino-acid-mediated activation of the RagC GAP FLCN. TFEB lacks the TOR signaling (TOS) motif responsible for the recruitment of other mTORC1 substrates. We used cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to determine the structure of TFEB as presented to mTORC1 for phosphorylation. Two full Rag-Ragulator complexes present each molecule of TFEB to the mTOR active site. One Rag-Ragulator complex is bound to Raptor in the canonical mode seen previously in the absence of TFEB. A second Rag-Ragulator complex (non-canonical) docks onto the first via a RagC GDP-dependent contact with the second Ragulator complex. The non-canonical Rag dimer binds the first helix of TFEB in a RagCGDP-dependent aspartate clamp in the cleft between the Rag G domains. Mutation of the clamp drives TFEB constitutively into the nucleus whilst having no effect on mTORC1 localization. The remainder of the 108-amino acid TFEB docking domain winds around Raptor and then back to RagA. This structure presents the phosphorylatable Ser residues of TFEB to the mTORC1 active site in a suitable geometry for their phosphorylation. The double use of RagC GDP contacts in both Rag dimers explains the strong dependence of TFEB phosphorylation on FLCN and the RagC GDP state.


Fluoxetine ameliorates mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA

April 2022

·

57 Reads

·

8 Citations

Molecular Therapy

Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA (MPS-IIIA) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in SGSH involved in the degradation of heparan sulfate. MPS-IIIA presents severe neurological symptoms such as progressive developmental delay and cognitive decline, for which there is currently no treatment. Brain targeting represents the main challenge for therapeutics to treat MPS-IIIA, and the development of small-molecule-based treatments able to reach the CNS could be a relevant advance for therapy. Using cell-based high content imaging to survey clinically approved drugs in MPS-IIIA cells, we identified fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Fluoxetine increases lysosomal and autophagic functions via TFEB activation through a RagC-dependent mechanism. Mechanistically, fluoxetine increases lysosomal exocytosis in mouse embryonic fibroblasts from MPS-IIIA mice, suggesting that this process may be responsible for heparan sulfate clearance. In vivo, fluoxetine ameliorates somatic and brain pathology in a mouse model of MPS-IIIA by decreasing the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans and aggregated autophagic substrates, reducing inflammation, and slowing down cognitive deterioration. We repurposed fluoxetine for potential therapeutics to treat human MPS-IIIA disease.


Current methods to analyse lysosome morphology, positioning, motility and function

March 2022

·

416 Reads

·

81 Citations

Traffic

Since the discovery of lysosomes more than 70 years ago, much has been learned about the functions of these organelles. Lysosomes were regarded as exclusively degradative organelles, but more recent research has revealed that they play essential roles in several other cellular functions, such as nutrient sensing, intracellular signalling, and metabolism. Methodological advances played a key part in generating our current knowledge about the biology of this multifaceted organelle. In this review, we cover current methods used to analyse lysosome morphology, positioning, motility, and function. We highlight the principles behind these methods, the methodological strategies, and their advantages and limitations. To extract accurate information and avoid misinterpretations, we discuss the best strategies to identify lysosomes and assess their characteristics and functions. With this review, we aim to stimulate an increase in the quantity and quality of research on lysosomes and further ground‐breaking discoveries on an organelle that continues to surprise and excite cell biologists.


Citations (9)


... To investigate the biological significance of the subset of genes reported in Figure 4a, we utilized ToppGene again to identify enriched gene ontology functions. The analysis confirms enrichment for functional categories related to replication and the cell cycle To our knowledge, apart from HUVECs, TFEB ChIP-Seq analyses have been conducted in HeLa, human EndoC-βH1, and HEK293 cell lines [4,6,49,50]. However, in none of these has the ability of TFEB to regulate miRNAs been analyzed in detail. ...

Reference:

Integrative Bioinformatics Analysis Reveals a Transcription Factor EB-Driven MicroRNA Regulatory Network in Endothelial Cells
TFEB and TFE3 control glucose homeostasis by regulating insulin gene expression
  • Citing Article
  • September 2023

The EMBO Journal

... It interacts with several endolysosomal trafficking proteins, including the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (CI-M6PR), which is crucial for targeting LEs. Significantly, CLN3 is not a Golgi-resident protein, but rather the newly synthesized protein transits through the Golgi to reach the lysosomes [39]. Retromer is required for the efficient endosome-to-TGN (trans-Golgi network) trafficking of CI-M6PR and lysosomal sorting receptor, sortilin. ...

Loss of the batten disease protein CLN3 leads to mis-trafficking of M6PR and defective autophagic-lysosomal reformation

... Lastly, we investigated whether the reduction in cell proliferation due to ARL8B inhibition varied with different levels of lysosomal activity. To enhance lysosomal activity, transcription factor EB (TFEB), a key regulator of lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy 28 , was constitutively activated in Huh7 and Hep 3B cells by introducing the S211A mutation. ARL8B knockdown resulted in a greater reduction in cell viability in TFEB (S211 A)-overexpressing cells compared to controls (Fig. 4N, S4E). ...

Structure of the lysosomal mTORC1–TFEB–Rag–Ragulator megacomplex

Nature

... In particular, inhibition of autophagy and lysosomal genes expression corrected several pathological features in MPS III cells and the MPS IIIB model, 18 as well as in MPS II mice 19 ; however, induction of autophagy and lysosomal genes expression ameliorated the phenotype of MPS IIIA mice. 20 Notably, accumulation of b-amyloid aggregates was also described in the mouse model of a neurological LSD sialidosis, caused by genetic deficiency of neuraminidase 1 (NEU1). 21 The authors speculated that NEU1 deficiency caused oversialylation of b-amyloid peptides and their increased secretion from the cell leading to the formation of amyloid plaques. ...

Fluoxetine ameliorates mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA
  • Citing Article
  • April 2022

Molecular Therapy

... The work presented here supports a previous study that identified enlarged lysosomes containing electron-dense material as well as deposits of membranous whorls in a patient skin biopsy carrying an R211Q mutation [1]. Membranous whorls and electron-dense material are commonplace in lysosomal storage patients [44,45], with the whorl-like structures being attributed to gangliosides [46]-such as the ganglioside GM1 we identified as elevated in DHDDS-patient lysosomes. We identified one previous report indicating the presence of elevated filipin staining in DHDDS fibroblasts from a heterozygous-affected individual harbouring the R205Q mutation, and a minimal elevation in fibroblasts from a patient harbouring a heterozygous D95N mutation [3]. ...

Current methods to analyse lysosome morphology, positioning, motility and function

Traffic

... The upregulation of several lysosomal proteins is not only the consequence of lysosomal disorders but also a necessary response to intracellular stress. Soldati et al. reported that the activation of the transcription factor TFEB, a master gene of lysosomal function, is required to eliminate Gb3 (Soldati et al., 2021). Given these findings, we speculate that the accumulation of Gb3 in KO hearts promotes TFEB-related signaling pathways, which induce hyperactive lysosomal function. ...

Repurposing of tamoxifen ameliorates CLN3 and CLN7 disease phenotype

EMBO Molecular Medicine

... Their cellular positioning is dynamic and responsive to various stimuli, including cellular stress and pH changes [6]. Dysfunction and depletion of lysosomes can lead to impaired autophagy, which has been linked to a spectrum of kidney diseases, such as crystalline nephropathy [7], diabetic nephropathy [8], and septic AKI [9]. Furthermore, lysosomal enzyme leakage, aberrant intracellular localization, increased lysosomal pH, and lysosomal membrane permeabilization can all contribute to lysosomal dysfunction, thereby worsening renal injury [10]. ...

LC3 lipidation is essential for TFEB activation during the lysosomal damage response to kidney injury

Nature Cell Biology

... They govern the repair mechanism of lysosomal biogenesis and secretion processes. Specifically, when lysosomes are damaged, the activity of mTORC1 is inhibited, leading to a decrease in the phosphorylation levels of TFEB and TFE3 [37,38]. Subsequently, these transcription factors dissociate from the 14-3-3 proteins and translocate into the nucleus. ...

A substrate-specific mTORC1 pathway underlies Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome

Nature

... It is known that TFEB phosphorylation plays a crucial role in determining TFEB subcellular localization. Different kinases may regulate TFEB activity by phosphorylating at different sites, such as ERK phosphorylates TFEB at Ser142, while mTOR phosphorylates TFEB at Ser122 and Ser142 sites (Settembre et al. 2011;Vega-Rubin-de-Celis et al. 2017;Napolitano et al. 2018). Next, the expression of TFEB and the phosphorylation at these sites were detected. ...

mTOR-dependent phosphorylation controls TFEB nuclear export