Adrian Bell’s research while affiliated with University of Manchester and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


The philosophical basis of Seeing and Touching Structural Concepts
  • Article

June 2021

·

101 Reads

·

6 Citations

·

Adrian Bell

·

Structural concepts are fundamentals of civil engineering for students to learn, for lecturers to teach and for engineers to use. Many students however find it difficult to understand structural concepts due to their abstract nature. Seeing and Touching Structural Concepts has been developed as an approach to help civil engineering students gain intuitive (without the need for analysis) understanding of structural concepts taking them from structural elements to whole structures and from theory to practice. The paper explains the philosophical basis of the approach which involves the fundamental ideas and principles underlying the approach and its evolution. This has included the development of over 60 physical models produced in pairs, one with and one without involving a structural concept, to illustrate the effects and the significance of the structural concepts. Over 70 associated cases using structural concepts creatively have been identified from engineering practice. A website, www.structuralconcepts.org, has been developed and two associated books have been published. Five criteria underpinning the approach of Seeing and Touching Structural Concepts are expressed as Seeking new connections, Exploring new meanings, Evolving into intuitive understanding, Making wide and creative applications and Simplicity (SEEMS), which are demonstrated using examples and synthesised case studies.



Citations (3)


... In the field of the conceptual learning of engineering science, it is well known that architecture students show a lack of sympathy for anything related to structural subjects, while they come up against difficulty in comprehension of the fundamental concepts of structural engineering science concepts [6,7]. Consequently, the impossibility of communication with the structural engineer science concepts and the debasing of the compositional viewpoint of the architect's work leads to further constraints on their professional work. ...

Reference:

Experiential learning in architectural engineering school through the hands-on workshop: Practically without calculations
The philosophical basis of Seeing and Touching Structural Concepts
  • Citing Article
  • June 2021

... Despite this technical boom in Britain, France, due to the trends of constructive thinking and rationalist spirit that was taking place at that time in the country [9,10], clearly knew from the beginning that Abraham Darby's discovery would be a real breakthrough; in fact, it understood that the possibility of having a new resistant material and in large masses gave the opportunity to change the scale and so it tried in 1755, with a failed attempt to build a cast iron bridge over the Rhine, twenty years before Britain succeeded in doing so over the Severn. Conceptually, therefore, we can determine that France was a pioneer in the conception of architecture and iron structures [11]. ...

Seeing and Touching Structural Concepts
  • Citing Book
  • October 2018

... Educating architecture students presents inherent challenges. In the conceptual learning of engineering science, it is well known that architecture students encounter difficulty comprehending the fundamental concepts of structural engineering science concepts [7,8]. ...

Understanding and Using Structural Concepts
  • Citing Book
  • December 2015