Aaron Reeves’s research while affiliated with Colorado State University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (7)


In vivo three-dimensional imaging of plants with optical coherence microscopy
  • Article

January 2003

·

68 Reads

·

46 Citations

A Reeves

·

·

J W Hettinger

·

Achieving the ability to non-destructively, non-invasively examine subsurface features of living multicellular organisms at a microscopic level is currently a challenge for biologists. Optical coherence microscopy (OCM) is a new photonics-based technology that can be used to address this challenge. OCM takes advantage of refractive properties of biological molecules to generate three-dimensional images that can be viewed with a computer. We describe new data processing techniques and a different visualization algorithm that substantially improve OCM images. We have applied OCM imaging, in conjunction with these improvements, to a variety of structures of plants, including leaves, flowers, ovules and germinating seeds, and describe the visualization of cellular and subcellular structures within intact plants. We present evidence, based on detailed examination of our OCM images, comparisons to classical plant anatomy studies, and current knowledge of light scattering by cells and their components, that we can distinguish nuclei, organelles and vacuoles. Detailed examination of vascular tissue, which contains cells with elaborate wall structure, shows that cell walls produce no significant OCM signal. These improvements to the visualization process, together with the powerful non-invasive, non-destructive aspects of the technology, will broaden the application of OCM to questions in studies of plants as well as animals.


MicroMeasure: A new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data

July 2001

·

992 Reads

·

238 Citations

The ability to identify individual chromosomes in cytological preparations is an essential component of many investigations. While several computer software applications have been used to facilitate such quantitative karyotype analysis, most of these programs are limited by design for specific types of analyses, or can be used only with specific hardware configurations. MicroMeasure is a new image analysis application that may be used to collect data for a wide variety of chromosomal parameters from electronically captured or scanned images. Unlike similar applications, MicroMeasure may be individually configured by the end user to suit a wide variety of research needs. This program can be used with most common personal computers, and requires no unusual or specific hardware. MicroMeasure is made available to the research community without cost by the Department of Biology at Colorado State University via the World Wide Web at http://www.biology.colostate.edu/MicroMeasure.


Figure 1. Optical coherence microscope: fundamental principle and schematic. A, In forming an image of deep target cells, OCM preferentially selects photons that are singly scattered from the target cells (left) and rejects photons that are scattered from overlying tissue (right). B, Near-infrared light (850 nm) is emitted by an SLD and travels along a single-mode optical fiber to the beamsplitter of a Michelson interferometer. Roughly 50% of the light travels along an optical fiber to a reference mirror whose position is controlled by a computer. The other 50% of the light travels along an optical fiber to the sample and is focused to a 5- ␮ m diameter spot in the plant tissue. A pair of rotating mirrors moves the focused spot across the x-y plane. To move the focused spot deeper into the tissue, motorized actuators translate the lens toward the plant. Photons traveling the same path length in the sample and reference arms combine to form interference fringes on the photodetector at the output of the Michelson interferometer. The amplitude of the fringes is measured elec- tronically and stored in the computer as the beam is scanned through the sample volume. Fringe amplitude is proportional to the square root of the scattering coefficient of the sample volume element under examination. 
Figure 2. OCM and SEM images of a 9-d-old Arabidopsis plant. A, Three-dimensional OCM image of an Arabidopsis shoot. The image is 750 ␮ m in x and y, and 500 ␮ m in depth (into the page, z). Leaves 3 and 4 and the petiole of an older leaf are indicated. This image has been rotated slightly to align better with the SEM images. Edges of the scanned volume are indicated with arrows. B, Scanning electron micrograph of the same plant as in A at a magnification close to that of the OCM. C, Scanning electron micrograph at a lower magnification showing the entire shoot. L3 and L4, Leaf primordia 3 and 4; Pet, petiole. Scale bars in A and B ϭ 100 ␮ m and C ϭ 1 mm. 
Figure 3. OCM three-dimensional data sets allow noninvasive cropping and slicing of images. A, OCM image (500- ␮ m) 3 of an 8-d-old 
Figure 4. Effects of voxel spacing and smoothing algorithm on visualization of OCM data. All panels show the same 7-d-old Arabidopsis plant. All panels (except F) are oriented with the cotyledons or cotyledon petioles at the panel sides. A, OCM image produced with voxels spaced 7 ␮ m apart. Arrows indicate leaf primordia; arrowhead indicates stipules. B, OCM image produced with voxels spaced 3 ␮ m apart. C, SEM image of the plant shown in A, B, D, and E. The same data set as shown in B was cropped to remove some of the voxels including those of the outermost surface of the leaf primordia. D, Image smoothed using AVS trilinear algorithm. E, Image generated without the smoothing algorithm. F, Higher magnification SEM in which stipules can be seen (arrowhead). Scale bars in A ϭ 250 ␮ m; B, D, and E ϭ 100 ␮ m; C ϭ 500 ␮ m; and F ϭ 50 ␮ m. 
Figure 5. Adjusting the ␣ -parameter and colormap allows different aspects of the data to be emphasized. The same data set seen in 

+3

Optical Coherence Microscopy. A Technology for Rapid, in Vivo, Non-Destructive Visualization of Plants and Plant Cells
  • Article
  • Full-text available

June 2000

·

324 Reads

·

53 Citations

Plant Physiology

J W Hettinger

·

M de la Peña Mattozzi

·

W R Myers

·

[...]

·

We describe the development and utilization of a new imaging technology for plant biology, optical coherence microscopy (OCM), which allows true in vivo visualization of plants and plant cells. This novel technology allows the direct, in situ (e.g. plants in soil), three-dimensional visualization of cells and events in shoot tissues without causing damage. With OCM we can image cells or groups of cells that are up to 1 mm deep in living tissues, resolving structures less than 5 microm in size, with a typical collection time of 5 to 6 min. OCM measures the inherent light-scattering properties of biological tissues and cells. These optical properties vary and provide endogenous developmental markers. Singly scattered photons from small (e.g. 5 x 5 x 10 microm) volume elements (voxels) are collected, assembled, and quantitatively false-colored to form a three-dimensional image. These images can be cropped or sliced in any plane. Adjusting the colors and opacities assigned to voxels allows us to enhance different features within the tissues and cells. We show that light-scattering properties are the greatest in regions of the Arabidopsis shoot undergoing developmental processes. In large cells, high light scattering is produced from nuclei, intermediate light scatter is produced from cytoplasm, and little if any light scattering originates from the vacuole and cell wall. OCM allows the rapid, repetitive, non-destructive collection of quantitative data about inherent properties of cells, so it provides a means of continuously monitoring plants and plant cells during development and in response to exogenous stimuli.

Download

Synapsis in a natural autotetraploid

October 1999

·

107 Reads

·

9 Citations

To test assumptions of the autotetraploid chromosome pairing model regarding events during synapsis, whole-mount spreads of synaptonemal complexes (SCs) of Machaeranthera pinnatifida (=Haplopappus spinulosus) (Asteraceae) (2n = 4x = 16) were analyzed by electron microscopy. On the assumption of one synaptic initiation per chromosome arm, each pachytene quadrivalent is expected to have one partner switch (PS), and the frequency of pachytene quadrivalents for each chromosome is predicted to be 2/3 (or 0.67). However, to the contrary, we observed a range of one to four PSs per pachytene quadrivalent with an overall mean of 1.56. This suggests that the number of synaptic initiations is greater than one per chromosome arm (or > two per chromosome), and the predicted frequency of pachytene quadrivalents should be > 8/9 (based on a minimum of three initiations per chromosome). However, in close agreement with the model, the observed pachytene quadrivalent frequency from SCs in this study was 0.69. To explain the apparent discrepancy between the observed frequency of PSs and the observed frequency of quadrivalents, the possibility of nonindependent synaptic initiations and presynaptic alignment are discussed in the context of their potential influence on quadrivalent frequency. Recombination nodules (RNs), which were scored in about half the SC spreads, occurred at a frequency (9.6 per nucleus) comparable with the chiasma frequency at diakinesis (9.3 per nucleus). The frequency of RNs as well as their distribution is consistent with the hypothesis that RNs occur at sites of crossing over and chiasma formation.


Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T. Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151: 1569-1579

May 1999

·

42 Reads

·

349 Citations

Genetics

We have used immunofluorescent localization to examine the distribution of MLH1 (MutL homolog) foci on synaptonemal complexes (SCs) from juvenile male mice. MLH1 is a mismatch repair protein necessary for meiotic recombination in mice, and MLH1 foci have been proposed to mark crossover sites. We present evidence that the number and distribution of MLH1 foci on SCs closely correspond to the number and distribution of chiasmata on diplotene-metaphase I chromosomes. MLH1 foci were typically excluded from SC in centromeric heterochromatin. For SCs with one MLH1 focus, most foci were located near the middle of long SCs, but near the distal end of short SCs. For SCs with two MLH1 foci, the distribution of foci was bimodal regardless of SC length, with most foci located near the proximal and distal ends. The distribution of MLH1 foci indicated interference between foci. We observed a consistent relative distance (percent of SC length in euchromatin) between two foci on SCs of different lengths, suggesting that positive interference between MLH1 foci is a function of relative SC length. The extended length of pachytene SCs, as compared to more condensed diplotene-metaphase I bivalents, makes mapping crossover events and interference distances using MLH1 foci more accurate than using chiasmata.


Distribution of Crossing Over on Mouse Synaptonemal Complexes Using Immunofluorescent Localization of MLH1 Protein

April 1999

·

3 Reads

·

330 Citations

Genetics

We have used immunofluorescent localization to examine the distribution of MLH1 (MutL homolog) foci on synaptonemal complexes (SCs) from juvenile male mice. MLH1 is a mismatch repair protein necessary for meiotic recombination in mice, and MLH1 foci have been proposed to mark crossover sites. We present evidence that the number and distribution of MLH1 foci on SCs closely correspond to the number and distribution of chiasmata on diplotene-metaphase I chromosomes. MLH1 foci were typically excluded from SC in centromeric heterochromatin. For SCs with one MLH1 focus, most foci were located near the middle of long SCs, but near the distal end of short SCs. For SCs with two MLH1 foci, the distribution of foci was bimodal regardless of SC length, with most foci located near the proximal and distal ends. The distribution of MLH1 foci indicated interference between foci. We observed a consistent relative distance (percent of SC length in euchromatin) between two foci on SCs of different lengths, suggesting that positive interference between MLH1 foci is a function of relative SC length. The extended length of pachytene SCs, as compared to more condensed diplotene-metaphase I bivalents, makes mapping crossover events and interference distances using MLH1 foci more accurate than using chiasmata.


Citations (7)


... We did not detect any defects in synapsis and desynapsis based on the localization of the lateral element protein of the synaptonemal complex, SYCP3 (Fig 2A). We also scored no difference in crossover recombination site formation during pachynema when observing control and Sas4 cKO spermatocytes immunolabeled against MLH1, which marks the majority of crossover recombination sites (Fig 2B and 2C; [57]). These observations are consistent with recent findings from analysis of the Plk4 cKO, which also demonstrated no defects in meiotic recombination or chromosome synapsis/desynapsis during spermatogenesis [51]. ...

Reference:

Meiotic divisions and round spermatid formation do not require centriole duplication in mice
Distribution of Crossing Over on Mouse Synaptonemal Complexes Using Immunofluorescent Localization of MLH1 Protein
  • Citing Article
  • April 1999

Genetics

... The bivalent pairing expected to occur in allopolyploids should lead to mostly disomic inheritance (i.e., two alleles at each of two distinct loci), whereas autopolyploids are expected to have multisomic inheritance (i.e., multiple alleles at a single locus) (Figure 1). It is important to point out that even though strictly bivalent pairing can occur in some autopolyploids, random segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis can result in multisomic inheritance (66,76,83,137,164). Therefore, multisomic inheritance is a unique feature that can define autopolyploids (129,166). ...

Synapsis in a natural autotetraploid

... Most research in OCT has focussed on in vivo imaging of tissues such as the eye, the skin, and the superficial layers of internal hollow organs. However, OCT has recently been adapted to imaging of living plant tissues (Hettinger et al. 2000). OCT provides a unique set of capabilities, including: (i) greater penetration than confocal microscopy; (ii) resolution typically in the 10 micron range; (iii) video-rate image acquisition; and (iv) portability. ...

Optical Coherence Microscopy. A Technology for Rapid, in Vivo, Non-Destructive Visualization of Plants and Plant Cells1(w)

... We estimated the number and distribution of recombination nodules in spermatocytes using immunolocalization of MLH1, a mismatch repair protein of mature recombination nodules, at the synaptonemal complexes (SCs). This method has proved to produce reliable estimates of the overall recombination frequency and the distribution of recombination events along individual chromosomes (Anderson et al., 1999;Froenicke et al., 2002;Segura et al., 2013;Pigozzi, 2016). ...

Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T. Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151: 1569-1579
  • Citing Article
  • May 1999

Genetics

... Because OCT uses scattered light to probe the internal structure of tissues, the depth and overall quality of the images depend on the type of tissues investigated. For example, while OCT can image the whole cross section of a soft Arabidopsis leaf [65][66][67], the same equipment is barely able to image the first cell layer of a sturdy tomato leaf due to insufficient light penetration [68]. Indeed, the denser the sample, the greater the absorption and the less scattered light is collected from the sample's internal structures. ...

Optical Coherence Microscopy. A Technology for Rapid, in Vivo, Non-Destructive Visualization of Plants and Plant Cells

Plant Physiology

... Metaphase plates were photographed with a Zeiss Axioskop microscope with digital camera, and the pictures were analyzed with Paint Shop Pro Photo X2. Chromosomes were measured with the assistance of the software MicroMeasure 3.3 (Reeves, 2001) and classified according to arm ratios, categorized by position of the centromere (long arm/short arm; modified from Levan et al. (1964). A minimum of two roots per individual were collected and the temperature was kept constant at 5 °C for 24 hours. ...

MicroMeasure: A new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data
  • Citing Article
  • July 2001