November 2018
·
39 Reads
·
2 Citations
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
November 2018
·
39 Reads
·
2 Citations
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
November 2018
·
25 Reads
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
May 2017
·
735 Reads
Journal of Physics Conference Series
Radiochromic film dosimetry has been widely adopted in the clinic as it is a convenient option for dose measurement and verification. Film dosimetry analysis is typically performed using expensive commercial software, or custom made scripts in Matlab. However, common clinical film analysis software is not transparent regarding what corrections/optimizations are running behind the scenes. In this work, an extension to the open-source medical imaging platform 3D Slicer was developed and implemented in our centre for film dosimetry analysis. This extension streamlines importing treatment planning system dose and film imaging data, film calibration, registration, and comparison of 2D dose distributions, enabling greater accessibility to film analysis and higher reliability.
October 2016
·
76 Reads
·
10 Citations
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
June 2015
·
25 Reads
The purpose of this study is to develop an accurate and effective technique to predict and monitor volume changes of the tumor and organs at risk (OARs) from daily cone-beam CTs (CBCTs). While CBCT is typically used to minimize the patient setup error, its poor image quality impedes accurate monitoring of daily anatomical changes in radiotherapy. Reconstruction artifacts in CBCT often cause undesirable errors in registration-based contour propagation from the planning CT, a conventional way to estimate anatomical changes. To improve the registration and segmentation accuracy, we developed a new deformable image registration (DIR) that iteratively corrects CBCT intensities using slice-based histogram matching during the registration process. Three popular DIR algorithms (hierarchical B-spline, demons, optical flow) augmented by the intensity correction were implemented on a graphics processing unit for efficient computation, and their performances were evaluated on six head and neck (HN) cancer cases. Four trained scientists manually contoured nodal gross tumor volume (GTV) on the planning CT and every other fraction CBCTs for each case, to which the propagated GTV contours by DIR were compared. The performance was also compared with commercial software, VelocityAI (Varian Medical Systems Inc.). Manual contouring showed significant variations, [-76, +141]% from the mean of all four sets of contours. The volume differences (mean±std in cc) between the average manual segmentation and four automatic segmentations are 3.70±2.30(B-spline), 1.25±1.78(demons), 0.93±1.14(optical flow), and 4.39±3.86 (VelocityAI). In comparison to the average volume of the manual segmentations, the proposed approach significantly reduced the estimation error by 9%(B-spline), 38%(demons), and 51%(optical flow) over the conventional mutual information based method (VelocityAI). The proposed CT-CBCT registration with local CBCT intensity correction can accurately predict the tumor volume change with reduced errors. Although demonstrated only on HN nodal GTVs, the results imply improved accuracy for other critical structures. This work was supported by NIH/NCI under grant R42CA137886.
June 2015
·
13 Reads
In this study, we develop an integrated software platform for adaptive radiation therapy (ART) that combines fast and accurate image registration, segmentation, and dose computation/accumulation methods. The proposed system consists of three key components; 1) deformable image registration (DIR), 2) automatic segmentation, and 3) dose computation/accumulation. The computationally intensive modules including DIR and dose computation have been implemented on a graphics processing unit (GPU). All required patient-specific data including the planning CT (pCT) with contours, daily cone-beam CTs, and treatment plan are automatically queried and retrieved from their own databases. To improve the accuracy of DIR between pCT and CBCTs, we use the double force demons DIR algorithm in combination with iterative CBCT intensity correction by local intensity histogram matching. Segmentation of daily CBCT is then obtained by propagating contours from the pCT. Daily dose delivered to the patient is computed on the registered pCT by a GPU-accelerated superposition/convolution algorithm. Finally, computed daily doses are accumulated to show the total delivered dose to date. Since the accuracy of DIR critically affects the quality of the other processes, we first evaluated our DIR method on eight head-and-neck cancer cases and compared its performance. Normalized mutual-information (NMI) and normalized cross-correlation (NCC) computed as similarity measures, and our method produced overall NMI of 0.663 and NCC of 0.987, outperforming conventional methods by 3.8% and 1.9%, respectively. Experimental results show that our registration method is more consistent and roust than existing algorithms, and also computationally efficient. Computation time at each fraction took around one minute (30-50 seconds for registration and 15-25 seconds for dose computation). We developed an integrated GPU-accelerated software platform that enables accurate and efficient DIR, auto-segmentation, and dose computation, thus supporting an efficient ART workflow. This work was supported by NIH/NCI under grant R42CA137886.
October 2013
·
16 Reads
·
1 Citation
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
June 2013
·
22 Reads
Purpose: Transrectal-ultrasound (TRUS) is the most common image modality used in permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPI), while MRI images can provide additional anatomical information. Our goals were to develop a novel method to register post-implant MRI to intra-operative ultrasound (US) images and demonstrate its potential usage for retrospective implant assessment. Methods: TRUS images of prostate and non-isocentric C-arm fluoroscopy (FL) images are captured intraoperatively right after implant. The reconstructed 3D seed cloud from FL images (seeds_FL) will be used as a bridge to register post MRI to US images. The Registration of Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy (RUF) images is done by an intensity-based point to volume algorithm. The day-one post CT and T2-MRI images are co-registered and the 3D seed cloud is segmented from CT (seeds_CT). The iterative-closest-point algorithm is used to compute rigid transformation between seeds_FL and seed_CT. MRI can be transferred to FL coordinate using registration of two seed clouds and then to US coordinate using RUF registration. A thin-plate-spline algorithm is used to deform the MRI contours and images according to deformation of two seed clouds. To demonstrate this registration method, post MRI images from ten patients were registered to US images. The prostate contours were compared between post US and MRI. The planning needle interferences with critical structure like neurovascular bundles (NVB) were investigated. Results: After registration, center of mass of both prostate and urethra were within 3mm between two contour sets. The anterior boundaries of prostate were often overestimated in post US contours. When planning needles were superimposed over contours, there were about 3-4 needles passing through or in close vicinity of NVB in all patients. Conclusion: A novel method to register post-implant MRI to intra-operative US images was developed and demonstrated in evaluating accuracy of intra-operative US contours and accessing needle passages to NVB during PPI.
... Machine learning (ML), which evolved from the study of pattern recognition and computational learning theory in artificial intelligence, intends to explore the study and construction of algorithms that can learn from data. 1 Recently, there is a tremendous increase in the use of ML in different areas of radiation oncology, such as treatment planning optimization, 2,3 segmentation, 4 radiation physics quality assurance, [5][6][7] contouring or image-guided radiotherapy. 8,9 In this paper, we focus on ML for radiation outcome modeling. [10][11][12] Radiation outcome modeling includes survival analysis, local tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) (e.g., radiation pneumonitis, cardiac toxicity, and esophagitis). ...
November 2018
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
... 10 However, these models are limited to dosimetric factors, while patient-related factors such as demographic, clinical, and imagederived factors can affect radiation sensitivity and toxicity. 11 Consequently, considering non-dosimetric factors can improve prediction accuracy. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of a predictive model for anticipating future cardiotoxicity prior to the administration of anti-cancer treatments is evident. ...
October 2016
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics