A. J. Heine’s scientific contributions

The earthquake resistance of many structures can be increased by the inclusion of special components which act as hysteretic dampers. During moderately severe earthquakes these dampers act as stiff members which reduce structural deformations, while during very severe earthquakes the dampers act as energy absorbers which limit the quasi-resonant build-up of structural deformations and forces. The hysteretic dampers are not required to withstand the main structural loads, and may therefore be optimized for their required stiffness and energy-absorbing features. On the other hand, the main structural components no longer require large energy-absorbing capacities and they may therefore be optimized for their required stiffnesses and load-bearing features. For many structures this separation of component functions should lead to increased reliability at a lower initial cost. Under earthquake attack structural damage should be reduced. Non-structural damage should be lower during moderately severe earthquakes, and for certain types of structure it should also be lower for very severe earthquakes. Various ways in which hysteretic dampers may be utilized in structures are discussed briefly. The development of several types of high-capacity, low-cost hysteretic damper, suitable for use in structures, is described. The dampers utilize solid steel beams deformed plastically in various combinations of torsional, flexural and shear deformations.

A structure designed to resist earthquake attack must have a capacity to dissipate kinetic energy induced by the ground motion. In most structures this energy absorption is developed in the vicinity of beam to column connections. Recent research has shown that connections are not reliable when subject to cyclic loading, such as results from earthquake attack. Connections in steel frames deteriorate due to local instabilities in adjacent flanges, and in reinforced concrete frames alternating shear loads produce diagonal tension and bond failures which progressively reduce the strength of the connection. Much work in building research and earthquake engineering in laboratories throughout the world is directed toward increasing the reliability and energy absorption capacity of structural connections. In this paper an alternative approach to this problem is described. This approach is to separate the load carrying function of the structure from the energy absorbing function and to ask if special devices could be incorporated into the structure with the sole purpose of absorbing the kinetic energy generated in the structure by earthquake attack. To determine whether such devices are feasible a study has been undertaken of three essentially different mechanisms of energy absorption. These mechanisms all utilized the plastic deformation of mild steel. They included the rolling of strips, torsion of square and rectangular bars, and the flexure of short thick beams. These mechanisms were selected for intensive study since they were basic to three different types of device each of which was designed for a separate mode of operation in a structural system. The characteristics of these mechanisms which were of primary importance in this study were the load displacement relations, the energy absorption capacity and the fatigue resistance. This information was obtained with a view to the development of devices for specific structural applications. This report describes the tests used to explore the basic mechanisms and the data obtained. It also include s a brief description of tests on scale models of a device which was designed to be located in the piers of a reinforced concrete railway bridge. It has been shown by the tests that the plastic torsion of mild steel is an extremely efficient mechanism for the absorption of energy. It was found that at plastic strains in the range 3% to 12% it was possible to develop energy dissipation of the order of 2000-7500 lb in/in3 per cycle (14-50 x 106 N/M2 per cycle) with lifetimes within the range of 1000 to 100 cycles. It was also shown that the mode of failure in torsion is an extremely favourable one for use in an energy absorbing device in that it took the form of a gradual decay. The other two mechanisms studied were both less efficient and less reliable than torsion and had capacities of 500-2000 lb in/in3 per cycle (3.5 - 14 x 106 N/M2 per cycle) and life times of around 200 to 20 cycles. Nevertheless they lend themselves to more compact devices than does the torsional mechanism and furthermore the devices may be located in regions in a structure where they are readily accessible for replacement after attack.