A. Gutmann’s research while affiliated with University of Pennsylvania and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Why Deliberative Democracy?
  • Article

January 2009

·

1,336 Reads

·

1,459 Citations

A. Gutmann

·

D.F. Thompson

The most widely debated conception of democracy in recent years is deliberative democracy--the idea that citizens or their representatives owe each other mutually acceptable reasons for the laws they enact. Two prominent voices in the ongoing discussion are Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson. In Why Deliberative Democracy?, they move the debate forward beyond their influential book, Democracy and Disagreement. What exactly is deliberative democracy? Why is it more defensible than its rivals? By offering clear answers to these timely questions, Gutmann and Thompson illuminate the theory and practice of justifying public policies in contemporary democracies. They not only develop their theory of deliberative democracy in new directions but also apply it to new practical problems. They discuss bioethics, health care, truth commissions, educational policy, and decisions to declare war. In "What Deliberative Democracy Means," which opens this collection of essays, they provide the most accessible exposition of deliberative democracy to date. They show how deliberative democracy should play an important role even in the debates about military intervention abroad. Why Deliberative Democracy? contributes to our understanding of how democratic citizens and their representatives can make justifiable decisions for their society in the face of the fundamental disagreements that are inevitable in diverse societies. Gutmann and Thompson provide a balanced and fair-minded approach that will benefit anyone intent on giving reason and reciprocity a more prominent place in politics than power and special interests.

Citations (1)


... Political discussion requires that, beyond stating the positions they hold, people articulate reasons for their policy preferences. Reason-giving is central to contemporary accounts of liberal theory (Habermas 2015;Rawls 1997;Chambers 2010) and deliberative democrats have argued that the public exchange of reasons between individuals can 'change minds and transform opinions' (Chambers 2003, 318; see also Dryzek 2002;Cohen 2005;Thompson 2008;Mutz 2008;Gutmann and Thompson 2009). In addition to the attitudinal effects of interpersonal deliberation, scholars have also speculated that justifying one's political attitudes may also induce a greater degree of 'internal-reflective' (Goodin 2000) deliberation and introspection which, in turn, might affect the content of political attitudes. ...

Reference:

Does Reason-Giving Affect Political Attitudes?
Why Deliberative Democracy?
  • Citing Article
  • January 2009