Publications (2)4.42 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This randomized double-blind controlled study was carried out to investigate the effect of 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) per day on the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. Patients who suffered a first ischemic stroke from 13 participating hospitals were enrolled. They were independent or only partially dependent in activities of daily living and all had received brain CT for diagnosis. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to the 100 mg ASA or the nicametate citrate (a vasodilator) groups, and trial medications were started within three to six weeks after the onset of stroke. The primary end point was cerebral reinfarction, and intracranial hemorrhage was classified as an adverse event. Four hundred and sixty-six patients participated in this study; and 222 cases (136 males and 86 females) were allocated to the ASA group while 244 cases (150 males and 94 females) were assigned to the nicametate group. No significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups was observed. Cerebral reinfarction developed 6.3% (14/222) in the ASA group and 11.9% (29/244) in the nicametate group. According to the Cox's proportional hazards model, the estimated risk ratio (ASA group vs. nicametate group) was 0.538, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.284-1.019. The result was of borderline statistical significance. The risk for cerebral reinfarction was reduced by almost 50% among those who took 100 mg ASA versus those who took nicametate.
    No preview · Article · Aug 1997 · Thrombosis Research
  • T K Lee · I N Lien · S J Ryu · K Y Lee · H H Hu · P H Tchen · C J Chen · S C Wu · Y C Chen
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to evaluate the efficacy of low dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke, this cooperative multicenter clinical trial was conducted on a non-blind basis. Patients having a first transient ischemic attack (TIA), reversible ischemic neurological deficit (RIND) or completed ischemic stroke were eligible for this trial. A total of 590 patients including 47 cases of TIA, 23 cases of RIND and 520 cases of completed stroke entered this study. These patients were allocated by the time of admission to one of the following 5 trial regimens: (1) vasodilators having no known inhibitory effect on platelet function (control group), (2) dipyridamole (DP) 50 mg 3 times a day (DP group), (3) ASA 300 mg once a day (ASA 300 mg group), (4) ASA 300 mg once in combination with DP 50 mg 3 times a day (ASADP group), and (5) ASA 100 mg once a day (ASA1 group). No difference in effect between the control and DP groups was observed, nor between the ASA 300 mg and ASADP groups. Therefore, we combined the control and DP groups to make a non-ASA group, and joined the ASA 300 mg and ASADP groups to make an ASA3 group. The differences in the cumulative event-free rate appeared to be significant between the non-ASA group and the ASA3 group and also between the non-ASA group and the ASA1 group. But the frequency distribution of age, territory of stroke, diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, hematological disease and hyperuricemia were significantly different among these 3 study groups. We thus included these covariates in the Cox's proportional hazard model to control their possible confounding effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    No preview · Article · Sep 1990 · Journal of the Formosan Medical Association