Jian Lin Lu

Nanjing Medical University, Nan-ching, Jiangsu Sheng, China

Are you Jian Lin Lu?

Claim your profile

Publications (2)4.06 Total impact

  • Jian Lin Lu · Qing Lai Tang · Fa De Liu · Ju Hong Hui
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We performed a randomized, prospective study to assess the possible role of combined naftopidil and tolterodine for facilitating the spontaneous expulsion of intramural ureteral stones. A total of 76 patients with intramural ureter stones were included in the study from December 2007 to February 2011. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups. Group A patients received naftopidil 25 mg/day, group B patients received naftopidil 25 mg/day plus tolterodine 2 mg (twice a day), and group C patients received tolterodine 2 mg (twice a day). Both groups were followed up for 2 weeks. The stone expulsion rate and time and the number of pain episodes were obtained. Subjects rated the urgency associated with each micturition using the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS). Pain descriptions were recorded by the patients using the visual analog scale (VAS). A significant difference was shown for the expulsion rate between the group C and the other two groups (P < 0.001 by log rank test). In groups A, B and C, the mean number of pain episodes was 2.25 ± 0.90, 1.38 ± 1.37 and 1.54 ± 1.18, respectively. The USS score for groups A, B and C at 3 days was 2.32 ± 0.55, 1.4 ± 0.58 and 1.34 ± 0.49, respectively. It was 1.75 ± 0.44, 1.2 ± 0.41 and 1.22 ± 0.42, respectively, at 7 days. On the other hand, a statistically significant difference was found between groups A and B, and groups A and C in relation to the visual analog scale score on days 3 and 7, respectively. Treatment with naftopidil and tolterodine appears to be beneficial in intramural ureteral stones clearance, particularly in the intramural ureter with symptoms of vesical irritability.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2012 · Urological Research
  • Shui Gen Zhou · Jian Lin Lu · Ju Hong Hui
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the efficacy of α(1)D-receptor antagonist Naftopidil and α(1)A/D-receptor antagonist Tamsulosin in management of distal ureteral stones. A total of 131 patients with distal ureteral stones were included in the study from December 2008 to September 2010. The patients were randomized to 3 groups: group 1 (43 patients), those receiving 10 mg naftopidil once daily; group 2 (45 patients), those receiving 0.4 mg tamsulosin once daily; and group 3 (43 patients) were given a watchful waiting and served as control group. All patients were followed up for 2 weeks. Ultrasonography and kidney-ureters-bladder (KUB) were performed on day 7 and 14. At the end of the follow-up period, patients who failed to expel the stone were scheduled to undergo ESWL or ureteroscopy. Stone expulsion was observed in 31 patients in group 1 (72.1%), 37 patients in group 2 (82.2%), and 13 patients in group 3 (30.2%). A statistically significant difference was noted with Chi-square testing between groups 1 and 3, and groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.000 and P = 0.000, respectively). Average time to expulsion was 7.6 ± 2.26 days (range 1-12 days) in group 1, 7.7 ± 1.94 days (range 2-11 days) in group 2, and 9.4 ± 2.48 days (range 6-14 days) in group 3. A statistically significant difference was observed in time to expulsion between groups 1 and 3, and groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.000, P = 0.001, respectively) by ANOVA testing. The side effects encountered in the study groups were generally mild and did not require cessation of therapy in any patient. Naftopidil could significantly increase spontaneous passage of distal ureteral stones with low side effects. The stone expulsion rate is similar for the tamsulosin.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2011 · World Journal of Urology

Publication Stats

16 Citations
4.06 Total Impact Points


  • 2011-2012
    • Nanjing Medical University
      • Department of Urology
      Nan-ching, Jiangsu Sheng, China