Are you Angelique J Goverde?

Claim your profile

Publications (14)

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Sex differences in incidence, onset and course of schizophrenia suggest sex hormones play a protective role in the pathophysiology. Such a role is also proposed for oxytocin, another important regulator of reproduction function. Evidence on the efficacy of sex hormones and oxytocin in the treatment of schizophrenia is summarized. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies were included, examining augmentation with estrogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), pregnenolone, and oxytocin. Outcome measures were total symptom severity, positive and negative symptom subscores, and cognition. In meta-analyses, combined weighted effect sizes (Hedges' g) per hormone were calculated. Twenty-four studies were included, examining 1149 patients. Significant effects were found for estrogen action (k=10), regarding total symptoms (Hedges' g=0.63, p=0.001), positive (Hedges' g=0.42, p<0.001), and negative symptoms (Hedges' g=0.35, p=0.001). Subgroup analyses yielded significant results for estrogens in premenopausal women (k=6) for total, positive, and negative symptoms, and for the SERM raloxifene in postmenopausal women (k=3) for total and negative, but not positive symptoms. Testosterone augmentation in males (k=1) was beneficial only for negative symptoms (Hedges' g=0.82, p=0.027). No overall effects were found for DHEA (k=4), pregnenolone (k=4), and oxytocin (k=6). Results for cognition (k=12) were too diverse for meta-analyses, and inspection of these data showed no consistent benefit. Estrogens and SERMs could be effective augmentation strategies in the treatment of women with schizophrenia, although potential side effects, partially associated with longer duration use, should be taken into account. Future trials are needed to study long-term effects and effects on cognition. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Article · Apr 2015 · Schizophrenia Research
  • Marlieke A de Wilde · Angelique J Goverde · Susanne M Veltman-Verhulst · [...] · Maria P H Koster
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: How does insulin action change during pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who develop gestational diabetes (GDM) compared with women with PCOS who do not? Women with PCOS who develop GDM already show disturbed insulin action early in pregnancy. Pregnant women with PCOS are at increased risk of developing GDM compared with women without PCOS. This study represents a post hoc analysis of a subgroup of pregnant women with PCOS participating in a multicentre prospective cohort study. A total of 72 women were included. Women with PCOS and a wish to conceive were included before conception and followed during pregnancy. Insulin, glucose, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and testosterone were analysed at three different time points in women who developed GDM and women who did not. Seventy-two pregnant women with PCOS were included of which 22 (31%) women developed GDM. Both insulin levels and HOMA-IR were significantly higher at each sampling point in women with PCOS who developed GDM. SHBG levels were significantly lower before conception and in the second trimester compared with women who did not develop GDM. Testosterone concentrations were significantly lower before conception in women who developed GDM. After adjusting for BMI, waist circumference and waist/hip ratio, the differences in insulin, HOMA-IR, SHBG and testosterone levels remained largely the same. Selection bias cannot be excluded since only women from one centre with a complete blood sampling set were included in this study. The knowledge that women with PCOS who develop GDM already have a disturbed insulin action early in pregnancy is likely to be useful in considering the pathophysiology processes underlying this disorder in this specific group of women. This study was funded by the Child Health research programme of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. M.A.d.W., A.J.G., S.M.V.-V., A.F. and M.P.H.K. have no conflicts of interest to disclose. M.J.C.E. has received grant support from the following companies (in alphabetic order): Illumina and MSD. B.C.J.M.F. has received fees and grant support from the following companies (in alphabetic order): Ferring, Ova-Science, PregLem SA, Roche and Watson Laboratories. The authors declare complete independence from funders., number NCT00821379. © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email:
    Article · Apr 2015 · Human Reproduction
  • Source
    Full-text Dataset · Mar 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND At present, it is unclear which treatment strategy is best for couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility. We hypothesized that the prognostic profile influences the effectiveness of assisted conception. We addressed this issue by analysing individual patient data (IPD) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).METHODS We performed an IPD analysis of published RCTs on treatment strategies for subfertile couples. Eligible studies were identified from Cochrane systematic reviews and we also searched Medline and EMBASE. The authors of RCTs that compared expectant management (EM), intracervical insemination (ICI), intrauterine insemination (IUI), all three with or without controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and IVF in couples with unexplained or male subfertility, and had reported live birth or ongoing pregnancy as an outcome measure, were invited to share their data. For each individual patient the chance of natural conception was calculated with a validated prognostic model. We constructed prognosis-by-treatment curves and tested whether there was a significant interaction between treatment and prognosis.RESULTSWe acquired data from 8 RCTs, including 2550 couples. In three studies (n = 954) the more invasive treatment strategies tended to be less effective in couples with a high chance of natural conception but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P-value for interaction between prognosis and treatment outcome were 0.71, 0.31 and 0.19). In one study (n = 932 couples) the strategies with COS (ICI and IUI) led to higher pregnancy rates than unstimulated strategies (ICI 8% versus 15%, IUI 13% versus 22%), regardless of prognosis (P-value for interaction in all comparisons >0.5), but at the expense of a high twin rate in the COS strategies (ICI 6% versus 23% and IUI 3% versus 30%, respectively). In two studies (n = 373 couples), the more invasive treatment strategies tended to be more effective in couples with a good prognosis but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P-value for interaction: 0.38 and 0.68). In one study (n = 253 couples) the differential effect of prognosis on treatment effect was limited (P-value for interaction 0.52), perhaps because prognosis was incorporated in the inclusion criteria. The only study that compared EM with IVF included 38 couples, too small for a precise estimate.CONCLUSIONS In this IPD analysis of couples with unexplained or male subfertility, we did not find a large differential effect of prognosis on the effectiveness of fertility treatment with IUI, COS or IVF.
    Article · Oct 2013 · Human Reproduction Update
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Clomiphene citrate (CC) is first line treatment in women with World Health Organization (WHO) type II anovulation and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Whereas 60% to 85% of these women will ovulate on CC, only about one half will have conceived after six cycles. If women do not conceive, treatment can be continued with gonadotropins or intra-uterine insemination (IUI). At present, it is unclear for how many cycles ovulation induction with CC should be repeated, and when to switch to ovulation induction with gonadotropins and/or IUI.Methods/design: We started a multicenter randomised controlled trial in the Netherlands comparing six cycles of CC plus intercourse or six cycles of gonadotrophins plus intercourse or six cycles of CC plus IUI or six cycles of gonadotrophins plus IUI.Women with WHO type II anovulation who ovulate but did not conceive after six ovulatory cycles of CC with a maximum of 150 mg daily for five days will be included.Our primary outcome is birth of a healthy child resulting from a pregnancy that was established in the first eight months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes are clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy and treatment costs. The analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. Two comparisons will be made, one in which CC is compared to gonadotrophins and one in which the addition of IUI is compared to ovulation induction only. Assuming a live birth rate of 40% after CC, 55% after addition of IUI and 55% after ovulation induction with gonadotrophins, with an alpha of 5% and a power of 80%, we need to recruit 200 women per arm (800 women in total).An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee has criticized the data of the first 150 women and concluded that a sample size re-estimation should be performed after including 320 patients (i.e. 80 per arm). The trial will provide evidence on the most effective, safest and most cost effective treatment in women with WHO type II anovulation who do not conceive after six ovulatory cycles with CC with a maximum of 150 mg daily for five days. This evidence could imply the need for changing our guidelines, which may cause a shift in large practice variation to evidence based primary treatment for these women.Trial registration number: Netherlands Trial register NTR1449.
    Full-text Article · Oct 2013 · BMC Women's Health
  • Antony A Luciano · Antonio Lanzone · Angelique J Goverde
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Hormonal causes of female infertility involve ovulatory dysfunctions that may result from dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, peripheral endocrine glands, nonendocrine organs, or metabolic disorders. It is important to think of anovulation not as a diagnosis but as a symptom of a metabolic or endocrine disorder that requires a thorough diagnostic evaluation to identify the specific cause and to implement effective therapies that assure the best possible pregnancy outcome and avoid long-term adverse health consequences. In most instances, the medical history points to the underlying dysfunction, which can usually be confirmed with laboratory or imaging tests. For more challenging cases, more extensive evaluations may be needed, including perturbation studies. Nevertheless, the management of anovulatory infertility is gratifying because its causes are often manifest and the treatment usually results in resumption of ovulatory cycles, restoration of fertility, and healthy offspring through natural conception without requiring expensive and intrusive assisted reproductive technologies.
    Article · Sep 2013 · International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: STUDY QUESTION: Is routine screening by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) needed for all women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Screening for glucose metabolism abnormalities of PCOS patients by an OGTT could potentially be limited to patients who present with a fasting glucose concentration between 6.1 and 7.0 mmol/l only. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Women with PCOS are at increased risk of developing diabetes. This study proposes a stepwise screening strategy for (pre)diabetes for PCOS patients based on risk stratification by fasting plasma glucose. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross-sectional study of 226 women diagnosed with anovulatory PCOS. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A consecutive series of 226 patients, diagnosed with PCOS at the University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands, were screened for glucose metabolism abnormalities by OGTT (75 g glucose load). MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: The majority of the 226 women (mean age: 29.6 ± 4.3 years; BMI: 27.3 ± 6.7 kg/m(2); 81% Caucasian) presented with a normal OGTT (169 women (75%)). Of the 57 (25%) women presenting with mild to moderate glucose abnormalities, 53 (93%) could be identified by fasting glucose concentrations only. Diabetes was diagnosed in a total of eight women (3.5%). In six women, the diagnosis was based on fasting glucose >7.0 mmol/l. The other two cases of diabetes initially presented with fasting glucose between 6.1 and 7.0 mmol/l and were diagnosed by OGTT assessment. No women diagnosed with diabetes presented with fasting glucose levels below 6.1 mmol/l. We therefore conclude that all diabetes patients could potentially be found by initial fasting glucose assessment followed by OGTT only in patients with fasting glucose between 6.1 and 7.0 mmol/l. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Before general implementation can be advised, this screening algorithm should be validated in a prospective study of a similar or greater number of PCOS women. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our study comprised of a mostly Caucasian (81%) population, therefore generalization to other ethnic populations should be done with caution. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external finance was involved in this study. B.C.J.M.F. has received fees and grant support from the following companies (in alphabetic order); Andromed, Ardana, Ferring, Genovum, Merck Serono, MSD, Organon, Pantharei Bioscience, PregLem, Schering, Schering Plough, Serono and Wyeth. A.J.G. has received fees from Abbott, Bayer Schering and IBSA. T.W.H. has received fees from Merck, Sharpe & Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline, NovoNordisk and Eli Lilly. The authors declare complete independence from funders. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00821379.
    Article · Jun 2013 · Human Reproduction
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The current evidence concerning the best treatment option for couples with unexplained and male subfertility is inconclusive. Most studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of treatment options, such as expectant management (EM), intrauterine insemination (IUI), with or without controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), and in vitro fertilisation (IVF), have not taken the couples' prognosis into account. It is very likely that the individual prognosis of the couple influences the effect of treatment. Individual patient data analyses allow us to take these prognostic factors into account, and to evaluate their effect on treatment outcome. This study aims to use anonymised data from relevant published trials to perform an individual patient data meta-analysis, evaluating the effect of couples' prognosis on the effectiveness of EM, IUI, with or without COS, and IVF. Based on earlier systematic reviews and an updated search, randomised controlled trials will be considered for inclusion. Untreated subfertile couples with unexplained or male subfertility included in trials comparing EM, IUI, with or without COS, and IVF are included. Authors of the included studies will be invited to share their original anonymised data. The data will be assessed on validity, quality and completeness. The prognosis of the individual couple will be calculated with existing prognostic models. The effect of the prognosis on treatment outcome will be analysed with marker-by-treatment predictiveness curves, illustrating the effect of prognosis on treatment outcome. This study is registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42011001832). Ultimately, this study may help to select the appropriate fertility treatment, tailored to the needs of an individual couple.
    Full-text Article · May 2012 · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • Source
    Femi Janse · Martinus J C Eijkemans · Angelique J Goverde · [...] · Robert J Norman
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The measurement of serum testosterone in women is challenging due to lack of trueness, precision, and sensitivity of various available testosterone assays. Accurate assessment of testosterone in women is crucial especially in conditions associated with alleged over- or under-production of testosterone, such as in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) or primary ovarian insufficiency (POI). The aim of this study was to measure and compare androgen concentrations in women with PCOS, POI, and female controls and to evaluate the performance of extraction RIA and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in these women. Cross-sectional study. Carefully phenotyped women with POI (n=208) or PCOS (n=200) and 45 healthy, regularly cyclic female controls were included. Method comparison analyses were performed for total testosterone, androstenedione (AD), and DHEA, as measured by LC-MS/MS and extraction RIA. All androgen levels were significantly elevated in women with PCOS compared with POI patients (P<0.05) and controls (P<0.05). Women with POI presented with similar androgen concentrations as controls, except for AD. Compared with measurements by extraction RIA, testosterone, DHEA, and AD concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS were systematically lower. However, using extraction RIA and LC-MS/MS, testosterone, DHEA, and AD measurements were shown to have good agreement as assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.94-0.91), 0.83 (0.79-0.86), and 0.96 (0.95-0.97) respectively. LC-MS/MS, compared with a labor-intensive extraction RIA, shows good precision, sensitivity, and high accuracy for measuring female testosterone, DHEA, and AD concentrations under various clinical conditions. LC-MS/MS, therefore, represents a convenient and reliable assay for both clinical and research purposes, where androgen measurement in women is required.
    Full-text Article · Dec 2011 · European Journal of Endocrinology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: To evaluate the significance of NR5A1 mutations in a large, well-phenotyped cohort of women with primary ovarian insufficiency (POI). Mutations in the NR5A1 gene (SF-1) were previously described in disorders of sexual development and adrenal insufficiency. Recently, a high frequency of NR5A1 gene mutations was reported in a small group of women with POI. Cross-sectional cohort study. University hospital. Well-phenotyped women (n = 386) with secondary amenorrhea and diagnosed with POI, including women with familial POI (n = 77). None. The entire coding region and splice sites of the NR5A1 gene were PCR-amplified and sequenced. The pathogenicity of identified mutations was predicted in silico by assessing Align-GVGD class and Grantham score. Sequencing was successful in 356 patients with POI. In total, 9 mutations were identified in 10 patients. Five of these mutations concerned novel nonconservative mutations occurring in 5 patients. Prediction of effect on protein function showed low to intermediate pathogenicity for all nonconservative mutations. The overall NR5A1 gene mutation rate was 1.4%. The current study demonstrates that mutations in the NR5A1 gene are rare in women with POI. Primary ovarian insufficiency remains unexplained in the great majority of patients; therefore, continued efforts are needed to elucidate its underlying genetic factors.
    Article · Nov 2011 · Fertility and sterility
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The role of sex steroid hormones in reproductive function in women is well established. However, in the last two decades it has been shown that receptors for estrogens, progesterone and androgens are expressed in non reproductive tissue /organs (bone, brain, cardiovascular system) playing a role in their function. Therefore, it is critical to evaluate the impact of sex steroid hormones in the pathophysiology of some diseases (osteoporosis, Alzheimer, atherosclerosis). In particular, women with primary ovarian insufficiency, polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis and climacteric syndrome may have more health problems and therefore an hormonal treatment may be crucial for these women.
    Full-text Article · Aug 2011 · Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)
  • Femi Janse · Marinus (Rene) JC Eijkemans · Bart CJM Fauser · [...] · Angelique J Goverde
    Chapter · Jun 2011
  • Femi Janse · Erik A.H. Knauff · Martinus F Niermeijer · [...] · Angelique J Goverde
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Premature ovarian failure (POF) is characterized by secondary amenorrhea before the age of 40 years, along with repeated increased follicle-stimulating hormone and low estrogen concentrations. POF is considered a complex genetic disease with a familial presentation in 12% to 50% of cases. POF may originate from different genes and various gene-environment interactions. The aim of this study was to identify possible differences in phenotype comparing women with familial and women with sporadic POF. A multicenter study was initiated in the Netherlands using standardized phenotyping. For each woman, medical history, menstrual cycle, and fertility and smoking status were assessed and a standardized examination was performed. Based on a detailed three-generation family history, women were identified as having either familial (defined as having at least one relative with POF) or sporadic POF. A total of 58 familial cases and 142 sporadic cases of POF were identified. Maternal age at menopause was significantly lower in the women with familial compared with the women with sporadic POF (41.0 +/- 7.5 and 49.7 +/- 2.6 y, respectively; P < 0.001). Sex hormone-binding globulin concentration was significantly higher in the women with familial than in the women with sporadic POF (73.6 +/- 37.1 and 55.2 +/- 26.9 nmol/L, respectively; P = 0.002). All other characteristics, such as parity, bone mineral density, and serum follicle-stimulating hormone and lipid levels were similar, as was the incidence of autoimmunity and cytogenetic abnormalities. Familial and sporadic POF do not differ in phenotype except for maternal menopause age and sex hormone-binding globulin concentration. Future studies are needed to unravel the genotype-phenotype interactions in POF.
    Article · Jul 2010 · Menopause (New York, N.Y.)
  • Source
    Full-text Article ·