William C. Richardson

University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, Washington, United States

Are you William C. Richardson?

Claim your profile

Publications (21)108.95 Total impact

  • Source
    D P Martin · P Diehr · K F Price · W C Richardson
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A randomized trial was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a health care plan which uses physicians as gatekeepers to control health services use and charges. New enrollees in United Healthcare (UHC), an independent practice association, were randomly assigned to the standard UHC plan requiring a gatekeeper, or to an alternate plan with equal benefits but without a gatekeeper. Individuals in both plans were similar in demographic characteristics, perceived health status, and other health insurance coverage. The gatekeeper plan had 6 percent lower total charges per enrollee than the plan without a gatekeeper. There were minor differences in hospital use and charges. Ambulatory charges were $21 lower per person per year in the plan with a gatekeeper (95% CI = -39.9, -2.1) and these were due to .3 fewer visits to specialists (95% CI = -0.50, -0.10). We conclude that a health plan which incorporates incentives and penalties for physicians to act as gatekeepers can reduce the cost of ambulatory services by limiting specialist visits.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 1990 · American Journal of Public Health
  • Source
    Kyle L. Grazier · William C. Richardson · Diane P. Martin · P Diehr
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The research reported here examined the factors which affected the decision to remain with either Blue Cross of Washington and Alaska or Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, or to change to an independent practice association (IPA) in which the primary care physicians control all care. The natural setting allowed examination of the characteristics of families with experience in structurally different plans; a decision not influenced by premium differentials; the importance of the role of usual provider; and a family-based decision using multivariate techniques. An expected utility model implied that factors affecting preferences included future need for medical care; access to care; financial resources to meet the need for care; and previous level of experience with plan and provider. Analysis of interview and medical record abstract data from 1,497 families revealed the importance of maintaining a satisfactory relationship with the usual sources of care in the decision to change plans. Adverse selection into the new IPA as measured by health status and previous utilization of medical services was not noted.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 1986 · Health Services Research
  • Source
    Claudia L. Haglund · Diane P. Martin · Paula Diehr · Ric Johnston · William C. Richardson
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, we analyzed the cost and volume effects of a waiver that eliminated lock-in restrictions on out-of-plan use in a health maintenance organization (HMO) with a Medicare risk-sharing contract. We compared out-of-plan cost and number of claims during a 15-month base line period when the lock-in was in effect, with a 24-month waiver period when the lock-in was removed. The results demonstrate that average per capita cost and claims increased significantly for both Medicare Part A (hospital insurance) and Part B (supplementary medical insurance) out-of-plan services during the waiver. Self-referred out-of-plan use normally prohibited by lock-in, accounted for 20 percent of all out-of-plan costs during the waiver and 57 percent of the increase in out-of-plan costs from the lock-in to the waiver. The combination of risk-sharing and lock-in provisions holds promise as a method for reducing expenditures for the Medicare program.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 1985 · Health care financing review
  • Source
    P Diehr · D P Martin · K F Price · L J Friedlander · W C Richardson · D C Riedel
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A previous study of low-income enrollees in a closed-panel health maintenance organization (HMO) and a Blue Cross/Blue Shield (BC/BS) plan showed that the effect on the use of health services of the age, sex, health status, previous health care use, race, and family size of the enrollees was different in the two plans. We have replicated this study using the same two provider plans but studying a different group of white collar, middle class enrollees. A third plan, an experimental independent practice association (IPA), was also available for analysis. Utilization was defined as use (yes/no) and the quantity of use for those who used services (in standardized dollars). Significant interactions were detected between plan and all of the independent variables but race. The use of services in the HMO was least affected by enrollees' characteristics (age, sex, race, health status, prior use, family size) and use was most sensitive to patient characteristics in BC. In some respects, the IPA was more like the HMO and in other respects more like the BC/BS plan.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 1984 · American Journal of Public Health
  • Stephen H. Moore · Diane P. Martin · William C. Richardson
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SAFECO Life Insurance was a first-generation IPA of the primary-care-network type and grew to be the largest of its kind in the United States. In the current climate of government and private-sector interest in health-maintenance organizations and preferred-provider organizations, as well as case management, the SAFECO experience is particularly relevant because of many similarities with developing or contemplated plans of the IPA type.
    No preview · Article · Jan 1984 · New England Journal of Medicine
  • Stephen J. Williams · Paula Diehr · William L. Drucker · William C. Richardson

    No preview · Article · Sep 1982 · Journal of Risk & Insurance
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: At the national level there has been a desire to assure that individuals have access to effective personal medical care services. Accordingly, there has been an interest in linking policies on access to care to the health needs of diverse population groups. This article critiques three measures of access linked to health status: the Use-Disability Ratio, the Symptoms-Response Ratio, and the Episode of Illness Analysis. Their utility in determining whether a given level of health-service utilization is appropriate for the optimization of health status in a population is considered. As part of this task, we review the concept of health, its measurement, and data on the relationship between changes in utilization and changes in health status. Although the Use-Disability ratio may be a useful instrument to measure access equity, it appears less suited for the purpose stated above. Elements of both the Symptoms-Response Ratio and the Episode of Illness Analysis appear better suited for this purpose. Recommendations are provided on 1) the scope of services that should be included in a comprehensive construct designed to assess access related to health status, and 2) the required research to develop such a construct.
    No preview · Article · Jan 1982 · Medical Care
  • Fanny Gomez Greber · Stephen M. Shortell · William C. Richardson

    No preview · Article · Mar 1981 · Contemporary Sociology
  • Marie E. Michnich · Stephen M. Shortell · William C. Richardson
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Formal program evaluation is an important resource for health care decision making. It is necessary in situations where traditional organizational evaluative capabilities an no longer meet the requirements of the job at hand.
    No preview · Article · Feb 1981 · Health care management review
  • Marie E. Michnich · Stephen M. Shortell · William C. Richardson

    No preview · Article · Jan 1981 · Health care management review
  • Source
    Stephen H. Moore · Diane P. Martin · William C. Richardson · Donald C. Riedel
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A new type of independent practice association has been organized to encourage primary care physicians in private practice to become coordinators and financial managers for their patients' medical care. Each patient chooses one internist, family or general physician, or pediatrician and must be referred by that physician for all specialized care. The primary care physician authorizes payment from his/her own account for hospital and referral care provided to patients. He or she shares any deficit or surplus remaining at the end of the year. This is a background paper detailing the history of development and specific features contained in this new concept of putting the physician in charge and "at risk" for the costs of medical care to his/her patients. The plan has been operating in northern California, Washington, and Utah and has 40,000 members and 750 participating physicians. This historical background paper is part of a large project--State Employees' Insurance Benefits Utilization Study (SEIBUS) being done by the University of Washington School of Public Health to evaluate use and costs of medical care under this innovative plan.
    Preview · Article · Feb 1980 · Health care financing review
  • Source
    Paula K. Diehr · William C. Richardson · Stephen M. Shortell · James P. LoGerfo
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many federally financed programs have been launched to improve the access of the poor to medical care, under the assumption that this will improve their health. The effectiveness of these programs, however, has generally been measured by increased utilization rather than by improved health. The few studies which have considered health status have shown small or negative effects. Here, data are presented from a project which provided fully prepaid care to near poor families through existing sources in the community. A group of 748 enrollees was found to report worse health on four of five health indicators after one year of enrollment in the program; further, they appeared sicker on all five measures than a group without free medical care. It is suggested: 1) that the impact of health programs on the health of a population is a complex and poorly understood issue; and 2) that increasing access to health care may not be an effective way to improve health.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 1979 · Medical Care
  • Source
    P Diehr · S J Williams · S M Shortell · W C Richardson · W L Drucker
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mental health services were included in comprehensive benefits available with no out-of-pocket expenses to enrollees in the Seattle Prepaid Health Care Project. This study was designed to examine the characteristics of users as compared to nonusers of mental health services and to examine the possibility of lower use of somatic health services attributable to the availability of mental health services. Two enrollee groups were studied: one group included enrollees with at least one mental health service (MH-U) and the other included those with some somatic utilization but without mental health utilization (MH-NU). Results indicated that mental health users were different from nonusers based on sociodemographic, health status, and prior utilization measures. Further, the mental health utilizers consumed more somatic services than other enrollees, even controlling for background variables. The visit and admission rates for the MH-U group were 2.4 times that of the MH-NU group, and total inpatient and outpatient costs were three times as high. On all three comparisons, approximately 60 per cent of the difference was accounted for by mental health utilization and by differences in sociodemographic and health status characteristics. The remaining 40 per cent could not be explained, but there is a suggestion that the higher utilization occurred for conditions where medical care is discretionary.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 1979 · Medical Care
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mental health services were included in comprehensive benefits available with no out-of-pocket expenses to enrollees in the Seattle Prepaid Health Care Project. This study was designed to examine the characteristics of users as compared to nonusers of mental health services and to examine the possibility of lower use of somatic health services attributable to the availability of mental health services. Two enrollee groups were studied: one group included enrollees with at least one mental health service (MH-U) and the other included those with some somatic utilization but without mental health utilization (MH-NU). Results indicated that mental health users were different from nonusers based on sociodemographic, health status, and prior utilization measures. Further, the mental health utilizers consumed more somatic services than other enrollees, even controlling for background variables. The visit and admission rates for the MH-U group were 2.4 times that of the MH-NU group, and total inpatient and outpatient costs were three times as high. On all three comparisons, approximately 60 per cent of the difference was accounted for by mental health utilization and by differences in sociodemographic and health status characteristics. The remaining 40 per cent could not be explained, but there is a suggestion that the higher utilization occurred for conditions where medical care is discretionary.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 1979 · Medical Care
  • Stephen J. Williams · Paula Diehr · William L. Drucker · William C. Richardson
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mental health services were included in a comprehensive package of benefits available to low income enrollees in a prepaid group practice plan (PGP) and in an independent practice plan (IPP) under the Seattle Prepaid Health Care Project. There were no out-of-pocket costs for enrollees. Utilization of services was studied for four years under conditions that might simulate universal entitlement. The analyses indicated that females used substantially more mental health services than males and that enrollees aged 20-44 used more services than those in other age groups. The prepaid group practice generally experienced higher utilization than the prepaid independent plan. Significant racial differences were evident with whites using more services than blacks and black males using strikingly few services. The prepaid independent plan was oriented toward physician providers and emphasized individual psychotherapy while the prepaid group practice employed a diversity of practitioners and therapeutic modalities. The data indicated that the per cent of enrollees using any mental health services was twice as great in the PGP as in the IPP. However, once access to the provider system was achieved, the number of services utilized was greater in the PGP. Inpatient services were also examined. A significantly higher proportion of IPP enrollees were admitted for inpatient care as compared to PGP enrollees. Finally, the cost of mental health services was less than ten per cent of total health service costs in both plans.
    No preview · Article · Mar 1979 · Medical Care
  • James P. Logerfo · Robert A. Efird · Paula K. Diehr · William C. Richardson
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Seattle Prepaid Health Care Evaluation Project is a comparative study designed to assess the care received by persons enrolled in either a large prepaid group practice (PGP) or in a prepaid, independent practice setting in which physicians are reimbursed on a fee-for-service basis (IPP). As part of the study we assessed the patterns of surgical care for hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy. Overall, there were 215 such procedures with an exposure adjusted rate being five times higher in the IPP than in the PGP. After eliminating 43 per cent of procedures in the IPP and 22 per cent in the PGP which did not meet specified criteria for either necessary, appropriate or justifiable surgery, the exposure-adjusted rate differential was 3.9 times higher in the IPP with the difference in the rates being mainly attributable to hysterectomy and tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy. We conclude there were more unnecessary procedures in the IPP, but the fact that a significant difference in the incidence of surgery persisted even after elimination of such cases suggests that the differences in rates of surgery between the IPP and PGP cannot be solely attributed to a higher rate of inappropriate surgery in the IPP.
    No preview · Article · Feb 1979 · Medical Care
  • W C Richardson · S M Shortell · W H Campbell

    No preview · Article · Jan 1979 · American journal of pharmaceutical education
  • James P. LoGerfo · Irene M. Dynes · Floyd Frost · Paula K. Diehr · William C. Richardson
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the Seattle Prepaid Health Care Project, we studied medical records and claims information for all 97 children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy in an independent practice plan from February 1971, through January 1975. Overall only 32 per cent of the procedures met commonly promulgated indications of surgery. Of 77 persons having one of these procedures performed because of recurrent pharyngeal or ear infections, 86 per cent did not meet the indications for surgery suggested by screening criteria adapted from model guidelines for PSRO use. The average number of episodes of illness was estimated to be 1.71/per year in the year prior to surgery using lenient assumptions. It is concluded that a major reduction in the frequency of these procedures would be effected by developing an audit strategy that assures the stated indications meet commonly recommended guidelines. The reduction in surgery would occur irrespective of the debate about the efficacy of these procedures.
    No preview · Article · Dec 1978 · Medical Care
  • James P. LoGerfo · Eric Larson · William C. Richardson
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As part of a comprehensive evaluation of care received by enrollees in a prepaid community health care project, we studied the process of care for enrollees reported to have a urinary tract infection. The care given to 98 patients enrolled in a large prepaid group practice (PGP) and 69 patients seen by 45 physicians in the independent practice setting (IPP) was analyzed. We found the process of care to be significantly better in the PGP, with a large part of the difference due to more appropriate utilization of urine cultures. This occurred despite a higher visit rate to internists in the IPP, and suggests that the organization of practice strongly affects the process of care received by patients even when all care is fully prepaid.
    No preview · Article · Jul 1978 · Medical Care
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A causal model of health services which includes patient and provider variables, perceived access to care, utilization of services, continuity of care, technical quality of the care process, technical quality of the care outcome, and patient satisfaction is applied to a group of diabetic patients enrolled in the Seattle Prepaid Health Care Project. The enrollees received comprehensive health services at zero out-of-pocket cost from either a prepaid group practice plan or an independent practice plan. Surveys were periodically conducted to determine health status, satisfaction, and demographic characteristics of the enrollees; utilization of services was monitored throughout the experiment. The causal model is operationalized through the use of path analysis. Significant relationships (p less than or equal to .10) were established between satisfaction and perceived access to care, family size, sex, and professional qualifications of the provider; between outcome of care and health status, female education, and physician performance; between physician performance and professional qualifications; between continuity of care and health status and female education; between utilization and perceived access, specialty of provider, and provider system; and between access to care and provider system. The policy implications of the results are discussed.
    No preview · Article · May 1978 · Medical Care