ArticlePDF Available

Best Practices in Public Health Risk and Crisis Communication

Authors:
Best Practices in Public Health Risk and Crisis
Communication
VINCENT T. COVELLO, PhD
Director, Center for Risk Communication, New York, New York, USA
The World Trade Center tragedy of September 11, 2001, the subsequent anthrax
attacks, and other recent events have heightened public health agencies’ awareness of the
need to enhance their risk and crisis communication skills. The threat of chemical and
biological weapons, and the risk posed to human populations, presents a unique oppor-
tunity for public health agencies to assess and elevate their level of communication
preparedness for all risk and crisis scenarios. Following is a checklist of best practices
that should be included in any public health risk and crisis communication plan.
Best Practice 1. Accept and Involve Stakeholders as Legitimate Partners
Guidelines:
*
Demonstrate respect for persons affected by risk management decisions by involving
them early, before important decisions are made.
*
Involve all parties that have an interest or a stake in the particular risk.
*
Include in the decision-making process the broad range of factors involved in
determining public perceptions of risk, concern, and outrage.
*
Use a wide range of communication channels to engage and involve stakeholders.
*
Adhere to the highest ethical standards; recognize that people hold you professionally
and ethically accountable.
*
Strive for mutually beneficial outcomes.
Best Practice 2. Listen to People
Guidelines:
*
Before taking action, find out what people know, think, or want done about risks. Use
techniques such as interviews, facilitated discussion groups, information exchanges,
availability sessions, advisory groups, toll-free numbers, and surveys.
*
Let all parties with an interest or a stake in the issue be heard.
*
Let people know that what they said has been understood and tell them what actions
will follow.
*
Empathize with your audience and try to put yourself in their place.
*
Acknowledge the validity of people’s emotions.
Address correspondence to Vincent T. Covello, PhD, Director, Center for Risk Communication,
29 Washington Sq W, Ste 2A, New York, NY 10011, USA. E-mail: vincentcovello@ix.netcom.com
Journal of Health Communication, 8: 5–8, 2003
Copyright # Taylor & Francis Inc.
ISSN: 1081-0730 print/1087-0415 online
DOI: 10.1080/10810730390224802
5
*
Emphasize communication channels that encourage listening, feedback, participation,
and dialogue.
*
Recognize that competing agendas, symbolic meanings, and broader social, cultural,
economic, or political considerations may complicate risk communication
Best Practice 3. Be Truthful, Honest, Frank, and Open
Guidelines:
*
Disclose risk information as soon as possible; fill information vacuums.
*
If information is evolving or incomplete, emphasize appropriate reservations about its
reliability.
*
If in doubt, lean toward sharing more information, not less—or people may think
something significant is being hidden or withheld.
*
If you don’t know or are unsure about an answer, express willingness to get back to the
questioner with a response by an agreed upon deadline. Do not speculate.
*
Discuss data and information uncertainties, strengths, and weaknesses—including
those identified by other credible sources.
*
Identify worst-case estimates as such, and cite ranges of risk estimates when
appropriate.
*
Do not minimize or exaggerate the level of risk; do not over-reassure.
*
If errors are made, correct them quickly.
Best Practice 4. Coordinate, Collaborate, and Partner with Other
Credible Sources
Guidelines:
*
Coordinate all inter-organizational and intra-organizational communications.
*
Devote effort and resources to the slow, hard work of building partnerships and alli-
ances with other organizations.
*
Use credible and authoritative intermediaries between you and your target audience.
*
Consult with others to decide who is best able to take the lead in responding to
questions or concerns about risks. Document those decisions.
*
Cite credible sources that believe what you believe; issue communications with or
through other trustworthy sources.
*
Do not attack individuals or organizations with higher perceived credibility.
Best Practice 5. Meet the Needs of the Media
Guidelines:
*
Be accessible to reporters; respect their deadlines.
*
Prepare a limited number of key messages before media interactions; take control of
the interview and repeat your key messages several times.
*
Keep interviews short. Agree with the reporter in advance about the specific topic of
the interview and stick to this topic during the interview.
*
Say only what you want the media to repeat; everything you say is on the record.
*
Tell the truth.
*
Provide background materials about complex risk issues.
6 V. T. Covello
*
Provide information tailored to the needs of each type of media. For example, provide
sound bites and visuals for television.
*
If you do not know the answer to a question, focus on what you do know and tell the
reporter what actions you will take to get an answer.
*
Be aware of, and respond effectively to, media pitfalls and trap questions.
*
Avoid saying ‘no comment.’
*
Follow up on stories with praise or criticism, as warranted.
*
Work to establish long-term relationships with editors and reporters.
Best Practice 6. Communicate Clearly and with Compassion
Guidelines:
*
Use clear, non-technical language appropriate to the target audience.
*
Use graphics and other pictorial material to clarify messages.
*
Personalize risk data. Use stories, narratives, examples, and anecdotes to make tech-
nical data come alive.
*
Avoid embarrassing people.
*
Respect the unique communication needs of special and diverse audiences.
*
Express genuine empathy. Acknowledge, and say, that any illness, injury, or death is
a tragedy to be avoided.
*
Avoid using distant, abstract, unfeeling language when discussing harm, deaths,
injuries, and illnesses.
*
Acknowledge and respond in words, gestures, and actions to emotions that people
express, such as anxiety, fear, anger, outrage, and helplessness.
*
Acknowledge and respond to the distinctions that the public views as important
in evaluating risks.
*
Use risk comparisons to help put risks in perspective; make sure those comparisons
take into account the distinctions the public considers important.
*
Identify specific actions that people can take to protect themselves and to maintain
control of the situation at hand.
*
Always try to include a discussion of actions that are under way or can be taken.
*
Be sensitive to local norms, such as speech and dress.
*
Strive for brevity, but respect requests for information and offer to provide desired
information within a specified time period.
*
Only promise what you can deliver, then follow through.
*
Understand that trust is earned—do not ask or expect to be trusted by the public.
Best Practice 7. Plan Thoroughly and Carefully
Guidelines:
*
Begin with clear, explicit objectives—such as providing information, establishing
trust, encouraging appropriate actions, stimulating emergency response, or involving
stakeholders in dialogue, partnerships, and joint problem solving.
*
Identify important stakeholders and subgroups within the audience; respect diversity
and design communications for specific stakeholders.
*
Recruit spokespersons with effective presentation and personal interaction skills.
*
Train staff—including technical staff—in basic, intermediate, and advanced risk and
crisis communication skills. Recognize and reward outstanding performance.
Best Practices 7
*
Anticipate questions and issues.
*
Prepare and pretest messages.
*
Carefully evaluate risk communication efforts and learn from mistakes.
*
Share what you have learned with others.
8 V. T. Covello
... This view is motivated by the perception that crisis communication is contributing to solutions of real world problems (Seeger 2006). Rhetorical approaches to crisis communication, hence, contribute to the development of best practices in crisis communication (Covello 2003;Heath 2006;Seeger 2006;Sandman 2006). Reynolds and Seeger (2005), for example, propose an integrative model of crisis and emergency risk communication. ...
... This finding is aligned with the observation of Seeger et al. (2018) that acknowledging uncertainties in a crisis situation makes the speaker honest and candid, which in turn enhances the speaker's credibility. Equally, in Covello's (2003) checklist of best practices for health risk and crisis communication, accepting uncertainties and avoiding over-assurance are listed under the best practice of being truthful, honest, frank and open. Therefore, we recommend naming the best practice of accepting uncertainty and ambiguity as a strategy under the best practice of honesty, candor and openness. ...
... To explain the meaning and applicability of the non-toxicologically based HBM reference value is a central role of risk communication (Covello and Sandman, 2001;Covello, 2003;Hoopmann, 2018). The questions "What is an HBM reference value?" and "What does the exceedance of an HBM reference value mean?" are heard again and again, especially in HBM investigations due to specific concern about exposure to environmental pollutants. ...
Article
Full-text available
HBM reference values, in contrast to toxicologically derived values, are statistically derived values that provide information on the exposure of the population. The exceedance frequency (if applicable for individual population groups) is often a first assessment standard for the local exposure situation for municipalities. More than 25 years have passed since the German Human Biomonitoring Commission (HBMC) formulated the first recommendations for the derivation of population-based reference values (HBM reference values, RV95) for substance concentrations based on HBM studies. A fundamental revision is timely, for several reasons. There have been considerable advances in relevant statistical methods, which meant that previously time-consuming and inaccessible procedures and calculations are now widely available. Furthermore, not all steps for the derivation of HBM reference values were clearly elaborated in the first recommendations. With this revision we intended to achieve a rigorous standardization of the entire process of deriving HBM reference values, also to realise a higher degree of transparency. In accordance with established international practice, it is recommended to use the 95th percentile of the reference distribution as the HBM reference value. To this end, the empirical 95th percentile of a suitable sample should be rounded, ensuring that the rounded value is within the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the percentile. All estimates should be based on distribution-free methods, and the confidence interval should be estimated using a bootstrap approach, if possible, according to the BCa ("bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap"). A minimum sample size of 80 observations is considered necessary. The entire procedure ensures that the derived HBM reference value is robust against at least two extreme values and can also be used for underlying mixed distributions. If it is known in advance that certain subgroups (different age groups, smokers, etc.) show differing internal exposures, it is recommended that group-specific HBM reference values should be derived. Especially when the sample sizes for individual subgroups are too small, individual datasets with potential outliers can be excluded in advance to homogenize the reference value population. In the second part, new HBM reference values based on data of the German Environmental Survey for Children and Adolescents (GerES V, 2014-2017) were derived in accordance with the revised recommendations. The GerES V is the most recent population-representative monitoring of human exposure to pollutants in Germany on children and adolescents aged 3-17 years (N = 2294). RV95 for GerES V are reported for four subgroups (males/females and 3-11/12-17 years) for 108 different substances including phthalates and alternative plasticisers, metals, organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), parabens, aprotic solvents, chlorophenols, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and UV filter, in total 135 biomarkers. Algorithms implemented in R were used for the statistics and the determination of the HBM reference values. To facilitate a quality control of the study data, the corresponding R source code is given, together with graphical representations of results. The HBM reference values listed in this article replace earlier RV95 values derived by the HBMC for children and adolescents from data of precedent GerES studies (e.g. published in Apel et al., 2017).
... 研究背景與動機 不確定性 (uncertainty) 是危機的屬性之一,事件的不確定性可能會 引發人們的不確定感,不確定感是危機傳播文獻經常提及的一項知覺 (Coombs, 2015;Seeger, 2006) 。當危機事件發生時,人們常常感受到不 確定感。儘管風險和危機傳播的最佳操作都強調 「承認不確定」 的重要 性 (Covello, 2003;Heath, 2006;Reynodls & Seeger, 2005;Seeger, 2006) ,而 且 危 機 的 定 義 也 多 聚 焦 於 不 確 定 的 特 質 (Millar & Heath, 2004;Seeger, 2006 影響 (Coombs, 2007;Coombs & Holladay, 2005 ...
... Since the messages resulting from the NCDS study focus on pre-and post-natal health, this is an age group that particularly warrants effective messaging about contaminants. These results are consistent with other studies that show the importance of and need for targeting messages to specific sub-groups [29]. In the future, communication campaigns about lead may need to also be targeted to a younger age group. ...
Article
Full-text available
Lead ammunition is commonly used to hunt waterfowl and other wildlife in the Arctic. Hunting with lead is problematic because the toxicant can be transferred to the consumer. Therefore, it is critical to evaluate perceptions and awareness of the risks associated with using lead ammunition among Arctic populations. Results of the Nunavik Child Development Study (a longitudinal health study gathering information on health and well-being among Inuit in Nunavik, Canada) included advice to eliminate the use of lead ammunition in hunting practices. We surveyed 112 Nunavik residents (93 women; 18 men) about their awareness of lead related messages, use of lead ammunition and risk perceptions about contaminants. Sixty-seven participants (59.8%) reported there was an active hunter in their household. We found that only 27% of participants had heard or seen the messages about reducing lead ammunition. After participants viewed the Nunavik Child Development Study messages about lead, 44% stated they would stop using lead ammunition. However, 28% indicated that they would continue using lead ammunition. We conclude that, while messages had an overall positive effect, further study is required to understand why people continue to use lead ammunition.
Article
Full-text available
Patients narratives are being recorded increasingly frequently and spontaneously in short user produced content (UGC) films, which may have an impact on the vlogger’s health as well as the public’s comprehension of the relevant health concerns. This paper addressed three research questions regarding the population characteristics of UGC video publishers, the narrative theme of the videos, and the emotional orientation of the commenters. This study aimed to deepen our understanding of COVID-19 patients’ narrative intentions and emotional needs through the theoretical frameworks of theory of planned behavior (TPB) and negative dominance theory (NDT). We collected 335 videos from 28 COVID-19 patients and 572,052 comments as samples on Douyin platform, the largest short-video website in China. Using Latent Semantic Analysis, we analyzed the descriptive information of the video blogs, the narrative textual information of the videos, and the emotional orientation of the comments. Our findings revealled seven categories of narrative themes, with 52.1% of video comments exhibiting a positive emotional orientation. Within a framework integrating TPB and NDT theories, we analyzed the behavioral intentions of vloggers and viewers during COVID-19 epidemic, and interpreted the persistent posting of videos and the active posting of comments as positive actions that counteracted the multiple effects of negative messages. This study contributes to the understanding of individual narratives in macro-risk communication, both theoretically and empirically, and offers policy recommendations in relevant fields.
Article
The COVID-19 emergency underlined the importance of an effective public health communication to limit the spread of the outbreak. Physicians as "public experts" can play a crucial part in health risk communication, even if their role is challenged by transformations into the information system. Therefore, the major objective of this study was to investigate public perception of medical experts' opinions regarding the COVID-19 emergency. The Italian public debate involving medical experts in the Twitter sphere during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has particularly been examined. A content analysis was performed on 2,040 randomly selected tweets. The results of content analysis show that the medical experts who tend to mitigate the risk received a higher number of tweets supporting their positions when compared to the experts whose statements were aimed at intensifying the risk. Since a public expert is a communicator, but also an advisor who can affect how laypersons perceive and react to risk events, this study can provide more knowledge about the public perception of different communication strategies incorporated by medical experts.
Article
Full-text available
Applied Corpus Linguistics Special Issue on Corpus Linguistics and the Language of COVID-19: Applications and Outcomes; Guest Edited by David Oakey, Benet Vincent Communication has played a critical role during the initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and communicators have had a particularly difficult task in persuading different types of audience to comply with ever-changing regulations. Local government organisations play a crucial role in recontextualising the national messaging for a local audience and encouraging the public to comply with regulations. This paper investigates local government organisations’ (henceforth LGOs) engagement strategies in COVID-related posts on social media. In collaboration with LGOs in England, we examined their communication strategies on Twitter and Facebook during the second UK national lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic in November-December 2020. Using methods from corpus-assisted discourse studies, the paper analyses the occurrence and functions of selected interactive engagement markers, in this case personal pronouns, questions and hashtags. We find that such linguistic features function to encourage engagement by (a) helping to foster relatedness through ambiguity; (b) creating autonomy-supporting communication; and (c) making messages ‘stand out’. Based on our corpus analysis, we discuss the initial response of the participating councils to our findings and outline future directions including the integration of multimodal approaches to studying the role of localised social media in national crisis management. We argue for more attention to be paid to the many local communicators who play an invaluable role in encouraging the public to comply with national measures in times of crisis.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.