A pilot study of the attitudes of Australian Rules footballers towards protective headgear

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport (Impact Factor: 3.19). 01/2004; 6(4):505-11. DOI: 10.1016/S1440-2440(03)80275-X
Source: PubMed


Despite a relatively high risk of injury to participants of Australian Rules football, very few players report wearing protective equipment. The aim of this paper is to describe the results of a pilot survey of the attitudes of community-level Australian Rules football players towards protective headgear and the risk of head injury. Seventy players from four purposefully chosen clubs in metropolitan Melbourne completed a self-report questionnaire at the end of the 2000-playing season. Almost all players (91.4%) reported they did not wear protective headgear during the 2000 season. Non-headgear users said that headgear was too uncomfortable (47.4%) and they didn't like it (42.1%). However, 80.0% of non-users said they would wear it if it prevented injury. The major motivation for wearing headgear was to prevent injury. Players considered rugby, boxing and driving a car, to be associated with a higher-risk of head injury than Australian Rules football. As a group, the players perceived the risk of head injury in Australian Rules football to be low to moderate when compared to other sports and activities. This partially explains why so few players wore protective headgear. Repeat surveys on a larger sample should be conducted to further understand the attitudes towards protective headgear and perceptions of risk in community-level Australian football players.

Download full-text


Available from: Paul McCrory, Apr 27, 2014
  • Source
    • "The field-based epidemiological methodology has already been pilot tested, adopted in other sports injury prevention RCTs and prospective cohort studies, and published in the international peer-review literature.11 12 35–43 Injury surveillance and detailed monitoring of exposure (ie, Australian Football participation) and compliance (with each intervention) are undertaken using the previously reported epidemiological methods.11 12 35 38 41–43 The study also includes a detailed evaluation of player attitudes, knowledge, behaviours and compliance, both before and after the intervention is implemented on the basis of similar studies.44–50 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Knee injuries are a major injury concern for Australian Football players and participants of many other sports worldwide. There is increasing evidence from laboratory and biomechanically focused studies about the likely benefit of targeted exercise programmes to prevent knee injuries. However, there have been few international studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of such programmes in the real-world context of community sport that have combined epidemiological, behavioural and biomechanical approaches. OBJECTIVE: To implement a fully piloted and tested exercise training intervention to reduce the number of football-related knee injuries. In so doing, to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness in the real-world context of community football and to determine if the underlying neural and biomechanical training adaptations are associated with decreased risk of injury. SETTING: Adult players from community-level Australian Football clubs in two Australian states over the 2007-08 playing seasons. METHODS: A group-clustered randomised controlled trial with teams of players randomly allocated to either a coach-delivered targeted exercise programme or usual behaviour (control). Epidemiological component: field-based injury surveillance and monitoring of training/game exposures. Behavioural component: evaluation of player and coach attitudes, knowledge, behaviours and compliance, both before and after the intervention is implemented. Biomechanical component: biomechanical, game mobility and neuromuscular parameters assessed to determine the fundamental effect of training on these factors and injury risk. OUTCOME MEASURES: The rate and severity of injury in the intervention group compared with the control group. Changes, if any, in behavioural components. Process evaluation: coach delivery factors and likely sustainability.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2009 · Injury Prevention
  • Source

    Full-text · Article · Jan 2005
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we will introduce two coarse-grained architectures for the block computations of 2-D separable DWT. Parallel-sequential architecture shows an improvement in computational complexity by a factor of JK, where J is the octave requirement and K is the filter size, when compared to sequential architecture. The parallel-parallel architecture has a computational complexity of O(N). Both architectures are scalable for different filter sizes and octave levels
    No preview · Conference Paper · Jan 1997
Show more