ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

This study was designed to evaluate possible organ and system disorders associated with experimentally induced levamisole poisoning in dogs. For this purpose, twelve clinically healthy dogs of different ages, sexes and breeds were used. They were divided into two equal groups (Group A and Group B) and given levamisole orally at a dose of 25 mg/kg of body weight daily for three days. The dogs in Group B were also injected with atropin sulphate (0.04 mg/kg of body weight) subcutaneously (sc) 1 hour after each administration of levamisole. Routine clinical examinations were made and some haematological, biochemical and blood gas parameters were established at various times after administration of levamisole. The dogs in Group A developed severe neurological signs, gastric haemorrhage, bloody vomiting, colic, anaemia and four dogs died. In Group B these signs were mild and only one dog died. Levamisole poisoning was characterised by a significant reduction in the total number of red blood cells (RBCs), concentration of haemoglobin (Hb) and packed cell volume (PCV), and by anaemia. Peripheral blood pH, actual bicarbonate of plasma (HCO3), actual base excess (BE), partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) and saturated oxygen (O2SAT) increased in both groups of animals and these dogs developed metabolic alkalosis 48 hours after the first administration of levamisole. The results of the study also show that levamisole poisoning in dogs causes a significant increase in the activity of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and of alkaline phosphatase (AP) and in the concentration of urea in both Group A and Group B. In the study, atropin sulphate reduced the severity of the clinical signs and the number of deaths, but it was not alone sufficient to remedy levamisole poisoning in dogs.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Introduction
Levamisole is an optic isomer of the
phenyl-imidothiazole salt of tetramisole
(MULCAHY and QUINN, 1986). It is wide-
ly used as an anthelmintic (COLES et al.,
1989; BOURDOISEAU et al., 1994; TA-
RELLO, 2002) and immunomodulatory
agent (LOWE, 1980; TREUTNIER-DON-
KER et al., 1987; MOJZISOUA et al.,
1997) in domestic animals and humans.
Levamisole has a broad spectrum of ac-
tivity against larval and adult forms of gut
nematodes (SAYLES and JACOBSON,
1983; COLES et al., 1989), lung (NEIGER
et al., 1994), and heart worms (BARRIGA
and ANDUJAR, 1988). The beneficial ef-
fects of the immunostimulatory action of
levamisole have been observed in calves,
dogs, cats, and human patients with im-
munodeficiencies (CHABANNE et al.,
1995), bacterial, viral, and fungal infec-
tions (LOWE, 1980; HADDEN, 1987), in-
flammatory disease (FLESH et al., 1982),
and some malignancies (TREUTNIER-
DONKER et al., 1987; DELORENZO and
STEWART, 1990). Furthermore, it has
also been used successfully to prevent
mastitis, foetal death, and endometritis in
cattle (FLESH et al., 1982).
Levamisole is a short and fast-acting drug
that is rapidly absorbed from the gastro-
intestinal tract or from the injection site
(GUERRERO, 1980). Distinct toxicity is
not a problem with levamisole at the re-
commended dosage, but it does not
show the extremely wide safety margin of
the benzimidazoles. Therefore, at higher
doses it produces cholinergic effects in
mammals that are manifested by saliva-
tion, hypermotility of the alimentary tract,
frequent defaecation, broncho constric-
tion, bradycardia, muscle tremors, excita-
tion, vomiting, increased salivation, colic,
convulsions and exophthalmia. Death
may occur following acute collapse, due
to asphyxia as a result of acute respira-
tory failure (CARLISLE, et al., 1984; AB-
DELSALAM, 1986; MONTGOMERY and
PIDGEON, 1986; WATSON et al., 1988;
CHAWLEY et al., 1993; BULUGAHAPI-
TIYA, 1997).
Levamisole represents an important the-
rapeutic tool for practitioners. Although
much is known about beneficial effects of
levamisole, many aspects of practical im-
portance remain to be investigated in ve-
terinary medicine. The establisment of
dose ranges, dose delivery system and
the recognition of patients and diseases
in which the use of immunomodulation
would be indicated are some of the im-
portant aspects that require elucidation.
Many undesirable side effects of levami-
sole have been reported in several dome-
sticated animals (CARLISLE et al., 1984;
MONTGOMERY and PIDGEON, 1986;
WATSON et al., 1988; CHAWLEY et al.,
1993) and man (DELORENZO and STE-
WART, 1990; BULUGAHAPITIYA, 1997).
However, its side effects are not well-de-
fined in dogs. Therefore, the aim of the
study is to investigate the side effects of
high doses of levamisole in dogs.
Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 111, 4988, Heft 2, Februar 2004
81
Originale/Originals
The effects of levamisole poisoning on the haemato-
logical and biochemical parameters in dogs
GOKCE, H. I.
1
, GUNES, V
1
., ERDOGAN, H. M
1
., CITIL, M.
1
, AKCA, A
2
., YUKSEK, N
3
.
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, The University of
Kafkas, Kars/Turkey
2
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Kafkas,
Kars/Turkey
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, The University of
Yuzuncu Yil, Van/Turkey
GOKCE, H. I., GUNES, V., ERDOGAN, H. M., CITIL, M., AKCA, A., YUKSEK, N. (2004):
The effects of levamisole poisoning on the haematological and biochemical
parameters in dogs.
Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 111, 8185
Summary
This study was designed to evaluate possible organ and system disorders associated
with experimentally induced levamisole poisoning in dogs. For this purpose, twelve cli-
nically healthy dogs of different ages, sexes and breeds were used. They were divided
into two equal groups (Group A and Group B) and given levamisole orally at a dose of
25 mg/kg of body weight daily for three days. The dogs in Group B were also injected
with atropin sulphate (0.04 mg/kg of body weight) subcutaneously (sc) 1 hour after each
administration of levamisole. Routine clinical examinations were made and some hae-
matological, biochemical and blood gas parameters were established at various times
after administration of levamisole. The dogs in Group A developed severe neurological
signs, gastric haemorrhage, bloody vomiting, colic, anaemia and four dogs died. In
Group B these signs were mild and only one dog died. Levamisole poisoning was
characterised by a significant reduction in the total number of red blood cells (RBCs),
concentration of haemoglobin (Hb) and packed cell volume (PCV), and by anaemia.
Peripheral blood pH, actual bicarbonate of plasma (HCO
3
), actual base excess (BE),
partial pressure of oxygen (pO
2
) and saturated oxygen (O
2
SAT) increased in both
groups of animals and these dogs developed metabolic alkalosis 48 hours
after the first administration of levamisole. The results of the study also show that
levamisole poisoning in dogs causes a significant increase in the activity of serum
alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and of alkaline phosphatase (AP) and in the concentra-
tion of urea in both Group A and Group B. In the study, atropin sulphate reduced the
severity of the clinical signs and the number of deaths, but it was not alone sufficient to
remedy levamisole poisoning in dogs.
Key words: Dog, levamisole, poisoning, haematology, clinical chemistry, blood
gases
GOKCE, H. I., GUNES, V., ERDOGAN, H. M., CITIL, M., AKCA, A., YUKSEK, N. (2004):
Auswirkungen einer Levamisolvergiftung auf hämatologische und biochemische
Parameter bei Hunden.
Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 111, 8185
Zusammenfassung
Diese Studie diente der Erfassung von Organ- und Systemstörungen bei Hunden nach
einer experimentellen Levamisolvergiftung. Zu diesem Zweck wurde 12 Hunden unter-
schiedlichen Alters, Rasse und Geschlechts (je 6 Tiere in Gruppen A und B) Levamisol
in einer Dosierung von 25 mg/kg Körpergewicht ein Mal täglich über drei Tage oral ap-
pliziert. Die Hunde der Gruppe B erhielten zusätzlich 1 Stunde nach jeder Levamisol-
gabe Atropinsulfat (0,04 mg/kg Körpergewicht) subkutan (sc) injiziert. Levamisol führte
bei den Hunden der Gruppe A zu schweren neurologischen Symptomen, zu
Magenblutungen, blutigem Erbrechen, Kolik, Anämie und zum Tod von 4 Tieren. In der
Gruppe B waren diese Symptome schwächer; hier kam es nur zu einem Todesfall. Die
Levamisolvergiftung wurde von einer signifikanten Verminderung der Gesamtzahl der
roten Blutzellen (RBC), der Konzentration des Hämoglobins (HB) und des Hämatokrit-
wertes (PCV) sowie von einer Anämie begleitet. Im peripheren Blut waren die pH-Wer-
te, aktuelles Plasma-Bicarbonat (HCO
3
-), aktueller Basenexcess (BE), partieller Druck
des Sauerstoffes (pO
2
), und der gesättigte Sauerstoff (O
2
SAT) in beiden Gruppen er-
höht. Eine metabolische Alkalose trat 48 Stunden nach der ersten bzw. 24 Stunden
nach der zweiten Levamisolgabe auf. Weitere Veränderungen betrafen die Serumwer-
te der Alanin-Aminotransferase (ALT), der alkkalischen Phosphatase (AP) und die Se-
rumkonzentration von Harnstoff. Atropin verringerte den Schweregrad der klinischen
Vergiftungssymptome und die Zahl der Todesfälle, jedoch erfordert die Levamisolver-
giftung darüber hinaus gehende Therapiemaßnahmen.
Schlüsselworte: Hund, Levamisol, Vergiftung, Hämatologie, Klinische Chemie, Blut-
gas
Materials and Methods
Dogs
Twelve clinically healthy dogs of different
ages, breeds, sexes and body weight
were used in the study. They were ran-
domly divided into two equal groups
(Group A and Group B) and kept indoors
for 2 weeks. The average of body weight
of dogs in Group A and Group B was
17.25 ± 1.35 kg and 19.33 ± 1.97 kg, res-
pectively. The average weight for all 12
dogs was 18.25 ± 1.22 kg). In addition,
the average of age for dogs in group A
and in Group B was 3.83 ± 0.40 years and
4.16 ± 0.47 years respectively. The aver-
age age for 12 dogs was 3.91 ± 0.28
years. Both groups were comprising 4
male and 2 female dogs. Food and water
were provided ad libitum.
Experimental design
The dogs in both groups A were given le-
vamisole (Citarin-L; Bayer, Istanbul, Tur-
key) orally at a dose of 25mg/kg of body
weight daily for three consecutive days.
The dogs in Group B were also injected
with atropin sulphate (0.04 mg/kg of body
weight; Vetas, Istanbul, Turkey) subcu-
taneously (sc) 1 hour after each adminis-
tration of levamisole.
Clinical examination
Routine clinical examinations were car-
ried out every morning daily for 3 days be-
fore the administration of levamisole and
then at 1, 3, 6, 24, 25, 27, 30, 48, 49, 51,
54 and 72 hours after administration of le-
vamisole. Rectal temperature, heart and
respiration rates were also recorded.
Haematology
Peripheral blood samples were collected
in dipotassium ethylenediamine tetra ace-
tic acid (EDTA)-coated evacuated tubes
daily for 3 days before administration of
levamisole and then daily for a further 3
days after administration. These blood
samples were used to establish total
white blood cell (WBCs) and total red
blood cell (RBCs) counts, packed cell
volume (PCV) and haemoglobin concen-
tration (Hb) (WILLARD, et al., 1989).
Serum samples were collected from each
dog daily for 3 days before the adminis-
tration of levamisole and then at 3, 6, 24,
30, 48, and 54 hours after administration.
These samples were used to establish the
concentrations of total protein, urea,
creatinine, glucose and the activity of
alkaline phosphatase (AP) and alanine
aminotransferase (ALT). Standard com-
mercial kits (Diasis Diagnostic Systems,
Istanbul, Turkey) were used to estimate all
the above biochemical parameters using
a Boehringer photometer 5010 autoanaly-
ser (Mannheim, Germany).
Three millilitres of peripheral blood were
also withdrawn from the jugular vein into
a syringe from each animal at 0, 6, 24, 30,
48 and 54 hours after each administration
of levamisole. These blood samples were
immediately analysed on a blood gas
analyser (Chiron diagnostics, Rapid Lab
248, Cambridge, UK) for pH, partial pres-
sure of carbon dioxide (pCO
2
), partial
pressure of oxygen (pO
2
), saturated oxy-
gen (O
2
SAT), actual bicarbonate of plas-
ma (HCO
3
-) and actual base excess (BE).
Statistical analysis
Paired t-test was used to analyse the sig-
nificance of the deviations from the pre-
treatment values (hour 0-hour x) within
each group. Students t-test was then
used to compare the significance of the
differences between groups. The levels
of significance accepted were P < 0.05,
P < 0.01, P < 0.001, as stated below.
Results
Clinical findings
There were no significant differences bet-
ween the rectal temperatures obtained
before and at various times after adminis-
tration of levamisole in both Group A and
82
Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 111, 4988, Heft 2, Februar 2004
Originale/Originals
Table 1. Clinical findings in dogs given levamisole (Group A) or levamisole + Atropin (Group B).
Group B (n = 6)
Clinically healthy; as with group A plus Atropin
Anorexia, dullness, increased salivation, vomiting, strai-
ning, frequent urination and defaecation, tremor , inco-
ordination
Reduced appetite, dullness, increased salivation, vomit-
ing, straining, frequent urination and defaecation,. mild
neurological signs such as incoordination, excitation,
hyperaesthesia with irritability and clonic convulsion (in
only 1 dog).
Reduced appetite, dullness, increased salivation, vomit-
ing, straining, frequent urination and defaecation
Clinically healthy; as with group A plus Atropin
Reduced appetite, dullness, increased salivation, vomit-
ing, straining, frequent urination and defecation, incoor-
dination
Reduced appetite, dullness, increased salivation, vomit-
ing, straining, frequent urination and defaecation, inco-
ordination. One dog had blood in gastric content, abdo-
minal tension and colic.
Reduced appetite, dullness, increased salivation, vomit-
ing, straining, frequent urination and defecation, inco-
ordination in all dogs. One dog had blood in gastric
content, pale mucosa, abdominal tension, colic, recum-
bency and collapse,and died at 32nd hours of the admi-
nistration.
Reduced appetite, dullness; 3
rd
levamisol dose plus
Atropin
Reduced appetite, dullness, increased salivation, vomit-
ing, straining, frequent urination and defaecation, inco-
ordination
Reduced appetite, dullness, increased salivation, vomit-
ing, straining, frequent urination and defaecation, inco-
ordination
Reduced appetite, dullness, increased salivation, vomit-
ing, straining, frequent urination and defecation, incoor-
dination
Reduced appetite, dullness
Time Group A (n = 6)
(Hours)
0 Clinically healthy; application of the first dose of levamisol
1 Anorexia, dullness, weakness, increased salivation, vomiting, straining, frequent
urination and defaecation, muscle tremor , incoordination in movement especi-
ally on hindlegs.
3 Anorexia, restlessness, increased salivation, vomiting, straining, frequent urina-
tion and defaecation, rapid and shallow respiration, exophthalmia, excitation, hy-
peraesthesia with irritability, clonic convulsion, ataxia, epilepsy-like seizures and
frothy mouth.
6 Reduced appetite, dullness, increased salivation, vomiting, straining, frequent
urination and defaecation
24 Clinically healthy; application of the 2
nd
dose of levamisol
25 Anorexia, dullness, weakness, increased salivation, vomiting, straining, frequent
urination and defaecation, tremor , head shaking, abdominal tension, colic,
bloody gastric content (in 2 dogs), anxiety and delirium.
27 Anorexia, restlessness, increased salivation, vomiting, straining, frequent urina-
tion and defaecation, tremors, rapid and shallow respiration, abdominal tension,
colic, bloody gastric content (in 3 dogs; 1 more dog had blood gastric content),
exophthalmia, clonic convulsion, ataxia, epilepsy-like seizures and frothy mouth,
prostration and collapse (in 2 dogs).
30 Reduced appetite, weakness, polydipsia, incoordination, tremor, random move-
ment, abdominal tension, colic, twitching on eyelids and forelegs. Pale mucosa
in three dogs two of which them died at 32
nd
hours of the administration.
48 Reduced appetite, dullness, pale mucosa, abdominal tension, colic; 3
rd
levami-
sole dose
49 Anorexia, restlessness, anxiety, straining, frequent urination and defaecation, in-
creased salivation, vomiting, tremors, abdominal tension, colic, random move-
ment, pale mucosa (in 1 dog). Blood in gastric content (in 1 dog).
51 Anorexia, restlessness, frequent urination and defaecation, increased salivation,
vomiting, rapid and shallow respiration, tremors, abdominal tension, colic,
exophthalmia, excitation, hyperaesthesia with irritability, clonic convulsion, epi-
lepsy-like seizures and frothy mouth, pale mucosa (in 1 dog). Blood in gastric
content (in 1 dog).
54 Anorexia, dullness, weakness, anxiety, rapid and shallow respiration, incoordi-
nation, abdominal tension, colic, recumbency and pale mucosa. Two dogs died
at 54
th
and 56
th
hours of the administration.
72 In the remaining two dogs: anorexia, dullness, weakness, abdominal tension and
colic
Group B (Table 2). In both groups heart
and respiration rate were significantly in-
creased 1 hour after each administration
of levamisole, but returned to pre-treat-
ment rates 3 hours after the administra-
tion and remained nomal up to the end of
the study (Table 2).
Clinical signs usually developed within
15 to 30 minutes, reached peak intensity
within 60 to 120 minutes and gradually
decreased 6 hours after each administra-
tion of levamisole in both Group A and
Group B.
In Group A, anorexia, dullness, weakness,
increased salivation, vomiting, straining,
frequent urination and defaecation, mus-
cle tremor and incoordination were ob-
served one hour after each administration
of levamisole and these signs gradually
decreased up to 6 hours after each admi-
nistration of the drug. Three hours after
each administration of levamisole ano-
rexia, restlessness, increased salivation,
vomiting, straining, frequent urination and
defaecation, rapid and shallow respira-
tion, exophthalmia, excitation, hypera-
esthesia with irritability, clonic convulsion,
ataxia, epilepsy-like seizures and frothy
mouth were observed. However in this
period severe neurological signs were do-
minant. Bloody gastric content, abdomi-
nal tension and colic were first observed
25 (2 dogs) and 27 (1 dog) hours after the
first administration of the drug which cor-
responds to 1 and 3 hours after the 2
nd
ad-
ministration. Pale mucosa also devel-
oped in these dogs 30 hours after
admi-nistration of levamisole. Vomiting
bloody gastric content and pale mucosa
were observed until the three dogs died.
Two dogs died at 32, 1 at 54 and 1 at 56
hours after the first administration of leva-
misole. Anorexia, dullness, weakness,
moderate abdominal tension and colic
were still present at the end of the study in
the suviving dogs (Table 1).
In Group B, all the dogs developed clini-
cal signs similar to those observed in
Group A 1 hour after each administration
of the drug. In this group, reduced appe-
tite, dullness, increased salivation, vomit-
ing, straining, frequent urination and defe-
cation were observed after each ad-
ministration of levamisole and atropin
sulphate for up to 6 hours after adminis-
tration of the former. Reduced appetite
and dull-ness were observed throughout
the study. On the other hand, only one
dog had mild neurological signs such as
incoordination, excitation, hyperaesthe-
sia with irritability and clonic convulsion 3
hours after administration of levamisole,
and these gradually disappeared within 3
hours. Additionally, one dog had bloody
vomiting, abdominal tension and colic 27
hours after administration of levamisole.
This dog developed pale mucosa in the
30
th
hour of the study and died 32 hours
after administration of levamisole (Table
1). In summary, in Group B, neurological
signs disappeared after administration of
atropin sulfate, clinical signs were mild
and only one dog died.
Haematology
The number of total RBCs and the con-
centrations of Hb were significantly re-
duced 48 hours after administration of le-
vamisole in both Group A and Group B
compared to pre-treatment values (Table
3). A significant decrease in the PCV was
first recorded 24 hours after administra-
tion of levamisole and remained high until
the end of the study in both groups of ani-
mals. There were no significant differ-
ences, compared to pre-treatment val-
ues, in the number of total WBCs of both
Group A and Group B throughout the
study (Table 3).
Blood gases
In Group B, peripheral blood pH, plasma
HCO
3
-, BE, pO
2
and O
2
SAT were signifi-
cantly higher then the pre-treatment val-
ues. These values were also high in the
dogs of Group A, but they were not statis-
tically significant. There were no signifi-
cant changes in pCO2 in either group
compared to pre-treatment values (Table
5).
Biochemical analysis
In both groups of animals the concentra-
tion of serum urea increased significanly 6
hours after administration of levamisole
and remained high 54 hours after admini-
stration (Table 6). The serum activity of AP
and ALT significantly increased 30 hours
after administration of levamisole in both
groups and remained high 54 hours after
administration (Table 7). There were no
significant differences in the serum con-
centrations of total protein, creatinine and
glucose in either group throughout the
study (Table 6 and 7).
Necropsi
Postmortem examination of dogs that
died from levamisole poisoning revealed
macroscopic lesions mostly localised on
Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 111, 4988, Heft 2, Februar 2004
83
Originale/Originals
Table 2: Temperature, heart and respiration rates of dogs in Group A and Group B. Data are
expressed as mean and standard error of the mean (mean ± SEM).
Group A (n = 6) Group B (n = 6)
Time Temperature Heart rate Respiration rate Temperature Heart rate Respiration rate
(Hours) (°C) (beats/min) (breath/min) (°C) (beats/min) (breath/min)
0 39.28 ± 0.16 98.0 ± 3.5 30.7 ± 3.2 39.11 ± 0.04 90.7 ± 9.3 28.0 ± 1.8
1 39.2 ± 0.17 117.6 ± 7.6** 51.2 ± 8.3** 39.08 ± 0.1 112.0 ± 3.4* 37.0 ± 1.3**
3 38.76 ± 0.17 99.3 ± 4.3 28.8 ± 4.6 38.7 ± 0.07 113.7 ± 4.7* 26.7 ± 1.7
6 38.88 ± 0.18 108.7 ± 7.3 27.3 ± 2.8 38.63 ± 0.1 114.7 ± 5.7* 34.7 ± 6.2
24 38.75 ± 0.15 100.7 ± 6.0 28.7 ± 1.9 38.82 ± 0.12 93.3 ± 6.4 29.3 ± 3.2
27 38.78 ± 0.17 100.3 ± 6.5 40.7 ± 8.2 38.68 ± 0.12 98.0 ± 6.8 32.0 ± 1.9
30 38.55 ± 0.16 99.7 ± 8.9 47.3 ± 10.5 38.55 ± 0.08 98.7 ± 10.8 36.0 ± 6.7
48 39.07 ± 0.17 113.5 ± 5.4* 45.0 ± 9.1 38.76 ± 0.15 121.6 ± 9.4* 34.3 ± 3.2
51 38.9 ± 0.11 116.5 ± 7.8* 43.8 ± 8.4 38.46 ± 0.05 114.4 ± 6.8* 29.2 ± 1.8
54 39.02 ± 0.17 102.0 ± 6.2 35.8 ± 7.8 38.61 ± 0.06 112.8 ± 7.6* 29.6 ± 2.7
Significant differences between pre-treatment values and post-treatment values (Hour 0-Hour x) within groups
are indicated by: * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01
Table 3: Haematological parameters of dogs in Group A and Group B. Data are expressed as
mean and standard error of the mean (mean ± SEM).
Group A (n = 6) Group B (n = 6)
Time RBC Hb PCV RBC Hb PCV
(Hours) (x10
6
/(l) (g/dl) (%) (x10
6
/(l) (g/dl) (%)
0 6.554 ± 619.3 13.44 ± 0.5 42 ± 1.7 5.874 ± 297.9 12.75 ± 0.8 39.7 ± 2.1
24 6.494 ± 397.4 12.52 ± 0.8 52.8 ± 4.1** 5.997 ± 526.4 11.57 ± 0.97 48 ± 3.7*
48 4.447 ± 519.1** 8.44 ± 0.5** 58.3 ± 2.2** 4.427 ± 464.7** 9.62 ± 0.56* 49.7 ± 3.1**
b
54 4.712 ± 445.2* 9.70 ± 0.8** 60.5 ± 1.7** 4.293 ± 449.1** 9.55 ± 0.57* 51.4 ± 2.3**
b
Significant differences between pre-treatment values and post-treatment values (Hour 0-Hour x) within groups
are indicated by: * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01
Significant differences in the values between Group A and Group B are indicated by: b = p < 0.01
Table 4: Effects of levamisole on the peripheral blood pH, actual bicarbonate of plasma
(HCO
3
) and actual base excess (BE) of dogs in Group A and Group B. Data are ex-
pressed as mean and standard error of the mean (mean ± SEM).
Group A (n = 6) Group B (n = 6)
Time pH HCO
3
BE pH HCO
3
BE
(Hours) (mmol/l) (mmol/l) (mmol/l) (mmol/l)
54 39.02 ± 0.17 102.0 ± 6.2 35.8 ± 7.8 38.61 ± 0.06 112.8 ± 7.6* 29.6 ± 2.7
0 7.33 ± 0.01 20.57 ± 1.1 -4.36 ± 0.97 7.32 ± 0.01 19.72 ± 0.9 -4.85 ± 0.76
6 7.33 ± 0.02 19.50 ± 0.8 -4.8 ± 0.71 7.35 ± 0.02 20.12 ± 0.8 -4.45 ± 0.77
24 7.34 ± 0.01 19.50 ± 1.2 -4.85 ± 1.28 7.34 ± 0.02 20.18 ± 0.6 -5.06 ± 0.65
30 7.35 ± 0.01* 18.10 ± 1.8 -6.83 ± 1.76 7.38 ± 0.01**
b
20.43 ± 0.9 -3.33 ± 0.72
48 7.36 ± 0.02* 18.58 ± 0.4 -5.53 ± 0.74 7.41 ± 0.02**
b
24.34 ± 0.8** -1.42 ± 0.74***
c
54 7.36 ± 0.01* 19.9 ± 0.7 -4.6 ± 0.93 7.37 ± 0.02** 23.6 ± 0.89* -1.86 ± 1.07**
Significant differences between pre-treatment values and post-treatment values (Hour 0-Hour x) within groups
are indicated by: * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001
Significant differences in the values between Group A and Group B are indicated by:
b
= p < 0.01,
c
= p < 0.001.
the liver, kidney, lung, and stomach. Hy-
peraemia and haemorrhage were observ-
ed in the liver. There was acute hepatic
degeneration and necrosis of 0.5 cm to
3,5 cm in size. Dilation of the bile ducts
and gallbladder was also observed. The
kidneys were oedematose, there was
severe congestion of the cortex and cor-
tico-medullar area and haemorrhage was
observed on the pelvis renalis. The kid-
neys were enlarged. Sero-haemorrhagic
exudation was observed on the cutting
edge of the cranial lobes of lung. Conges-
tion, ecchymotic and petechial haemor-
rhage and foam were also detected in the
trachea and bronchus. There was mas-
sive haemorrhage and congestion on the
cardia, fundus and corpus of the sto-
mach.
Discussion
Levamisole is a short and fast-acting drug
that is rapidly absorbed from the gastro-
intestinal tract or from the injection site.
The liver and the kidney are the main or-
gans involved in the metabolism and
excretion of levamisole (GUERRERO,
1980; ABDELSALAM, 1986). Normal
anthelmintic and immunomodulator do-
ses of levamisole in dogs are 10-11 mg/
kg of the body weight and
1
/
3
of the
anthelmintic dose respectively (ABDEL-
SALAM and NOURELHUDA, 1988;
URQUHART et al., 1998). However, when
levamisole is used at higher doses or
when its usage is prolonged, it causes
many undesirable side effects in animals
(CARLISLE et al., 1984; MONTGOMERY
and PIDGEON, 1986; ABDELSALAM and
NOURELHUDA, 1988; WATSON et al.,
1988; CHAWLEY et al., 1993) and hu-
mans (DELORENZO and STEWART,
1990; BULUGAHAPITIYA, 1997). It pro-
duces a reversible ganglion-stimulating
effect on both para-sympathetic and
sympathetic sites of mammalian tissues.
It has also been suggested that it has a
hypertensive effect in dogs and cats as
the result of the release of catechola-
mines from adrenergic nerve endings and
the adrenal medulla. Furthermore, levami-
sole is strongly suspected of inhibiting
cholinesterases, particularly at high
doses, leading to manifestation of the
nicotinic and muscarinic action of
acetylcholine such as muscle tremors,
salivation, broncho-constriction and hy-
permotility of the alimentary tract (AB-
DELSALAM, 1986). Therefore, some of its
toxic effects can be antigonized by cho-
linergic blocking agents such as atropine
and mecamylamine (HSU, 1980; ABDEL-
SALAM, 1986).
In the present study, dogs poisoned with
levamisole developed severe neurological
signs such as incoordination, excitation,
hyperaesthesia with irritability, clonic
convulsion, ataxia, epilepsy-like seizures
and frothy mouth. These clinical signs
suggest that the canine nervous sysytem
is seriously affected by levamisole. Ani-
mals developed haemorrhagic gastritis
most probably resulting from the irritant
effects of the drug on gastric mucosa.
Therefore, the poisoning was also cha-
racterised by gastric haemorrhage with
bloody vomiting, colic, abdominal ten-
sion, asphyxia and death, resulting from
the inhibition of cholinesterases. Animals
treated with levamisole also developed
more severe clinical signs and a higher
number of deaths occurred in this group
compared to dogs given levamisole and
atropin sulphate. Injection of atropin sul-
phate, a cholinergic blocking agent, re-
duced the number of deaths and severity
of the clinical signs, especially neurologi-
cal signs. However, still deaths and some
neurological signs occurred in this group,
suggesting that atropin sulphate although
may antagonizing some nicotinic and
muscarinic action of acetylcholine, itself
is not sufficient to remedy levamisole poi-
soning completely. Other studies have re-
vealed, too, that atropin sulphate, a com-
bination of atropin sulphate and me-
camylamine (HSU, 1980; GOKCE, 1996),
and phenoxybenzamine, dexamethasone
and nilamide (SHAH et al., 1986) may
have beneficial effects in the treatment of
levamisole poisoning in animals.
Several studies have indicated that leva-
misole poisoning causes acute hepatic
degeneration with marked subcapsular
haemorrhage, massive hepatic necrosis
and renal degeneration (HSU, 1980; AB-
DELSALAM, 1986). This equals to our
macroscopic findings in the dogs which
died from levamisole poisoning
In the study, there was a significant re-
duction in the number of total RBCs, in
the concentration of haemoglobin and in
PCV in both groups of dogs. The reduc-
tion in the number of RBCs and concen-
tration of Hb and the presence of diffuse
gastric haemorrhages, bloody vomiting
and pale mucosa indicate the develop-
ment of anaemia in dogs poisoned by le-
vamisole. The reduction in the PCV pos-
84
Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 111, 4988, Heft 2, Februar 2004
Originale/Originals
Table 5: Effects of levamisole on the peripheral blood partial pressure of carbon dioxide
(pCO
2
), partial pressure of oxygen (pO
2
) and saturated oxygen (O
2
SAT) of dogs in
Group A and Group B. Data are expressed as mean and standard error of the mean
(mean ± SEM).
Group A (n = 6) Group B (n = 6)
Time pO
2
pCO
2
O
2
SAT pO
2
pCO
2
O
2
SAT
(Hours) (mmHg) (mmHg) (%) (mmHg) (mmHg) (%)
0 38.68 ± 2.90 41.78 ± 2.97 61.37 ± 7.98 38.17 ± 2.98 38.6 ± 1.89 60.53 ± 5.42
6 42.49 ± 2.80 37.21 ± 1.52 76.07 ± 6.43 44.03 ± 4.11 37.22 ± 1.99 70.1 ± 5.95
24 41.57 ± 2.72 36.90 ± 1.72 70.03 ± 3.89 42.37 ± 2.78 41.46 ± 1.81 64.89 ± 3.60
30 45.33 ± 3.69 37.03 ± 3.40 72.53 ± 6.67 41.36 ± 3.67 35.73 ± 1.89 69.22 ± 5.47
48 45.60 ± 3.24 36.0 ± 1.86 72.88 ± 6.40 47.40 ± 2.52** 40.02 ± 1.46 80.5 ± 1.56**
a
54 41.51 ± 2.52 37.93 ± 1.33 68.25 ± 1.52 46.78 ± 2.74** 37.93 ± 1.95 78.68 ± 2.38**
a
Significant differences between pre-inoculation values and post-inoculation values
(Hour 0-Hour x) within groups are indicated by: ** = p < 0.01
Significant differences in the values between Group A and Group B are indicated by:
a
= p < 0.05
Table 6: Effects of levamisole on the concentrations of total protein, urea and creatinine in
the peripheral blood of dogs in Group A and Group B. Data are expressed as mean
and standard error of the mean (mean ± SEM).
Group A (n = 6) Group B (n = 6)
Time Total protein Urea Creatinine T. protein Urea Creatinine
(Hours) (x10
6
/(l) (g/dl) (%) (x10
6
/(l) (g/dl) (%)
G/dl mg/dl mg/dl g/dl mg/dl mg/dl
0 5.95 ± 0.48 16.8 ± 1.2 1.36 ± 0.08 5.94 ± 0.84 18.6 ± 1.2 1.33 ± 0.02
6 6.28 ± 0.38 21.6 ± 2.2* 1.51 ± 0.11 6.04 ± 0.70 23.4 ± 1.5* 1.35 ± 0.07
24 6.12 ± 0.66 20.5 ± 1.3* 1.56 ± 0.12 5.4 ± 0.45 26.4 ± 2.2**a 1.36 ± 0.13
30 6.75 ± 0.39 22.5 ± 1.9** 1.39 ± 0.07 6.16 ± 0.6 30.2 ± 3.5**a 1.40 ± 0.03
48 6.98 ± 0.34 23.8 ± 1.8** 1.44 ± 0.08 6.08 ± 0.5 37.4 ± 4.5**b 1.45 ± 0.14
54 6.85 ± 0.36 29.0 ± 3.6** 1.41 ± 0.10 6.96 ± 0.54 38.0 ± 3.4*** 1.59 ± 0.09**
Significant differences between pre-treatment values and post-treatment values (Hour 0-Hour x) within groups
are indicated by:*= p < 0.05, **= p < 0.01, ***= p < 0.001
Significant differences in the values between Group A and Group B are indicated by: a= p < 0.05, b= p < 0.01
Table 7: Effects of levamisole on the concentrations of glucose, alanine aminotransferase
(ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) in the peripheral blood of dogs in Group A and
Group B. Data are expressed as mean and standard error of the mean (mean ±
SEM).
Group A (n = 6) Group B (n = 6)
Time Glucose ALT AP Glucose ALT AP
(Hours) mg/dl U/l U/l mg/dl U/l AP U/l
0 77.8 ± 7.2 33.5 ± 12.1 60.3 ± 3.1 74.6 ± 6.2 29.0 ± 0.9 62.4 ± 7.4
6 83.8 ± 9.5 39.8 ± 10.1 74.8 ± 8.2 64.6 ± 3.8 28.4 ± 1.7 72.8 ± 5.6
24 76.5 ± 10.2 31.8 ± 8.2 69.0 ± 6.1 59.8 ± 7.9 31.2 ± 3.7 75.8 ± 3.1
30 85.0 ± 8.7 56.8 ± 3.2* 82.5 ± 9.3** 68.8 ± 12.3 49.8 ± 8.6* 92.6 ± 9.1**
48 86.1 ± 3.9 60.67 ± 6.2* 127.2 ± 26.4** 64.2 ± 6.8 46.4 ± 7.4* 132.8 ± 22.1**
54 73.8 ± 3.9 58.6 ± 5.5* 167.5 ± 32.4** 76.6 ± 15.1 50.8 ± 6.7** 135.0 ± 22.8**
Significant differences between pre-treatment values and post-treatment values (Hour 0-Hour x) within groups
are indicated by:*= p < 0.05, **= p < 0.01
sibly developed due to reduced food and
water in-take and in the presence of se-
vere vomiting, frequent urination and
defaecation. Studies have revealed that
levamisole causes haematologic side
effects such as agranulocytosis, leukope-
nia and thrombocytopenia in animals and
humans (MCANULTY and RUDD, 1985;
MULCAHY and QUINN, 1986; ABDELSA-
LAM and NOURELHUDA, 1988; QUINN,
1990; BULUGAHAPITIYA, 1997). Haemo-
lytic anaemia was also observed in two of
six dogs after repeated doses of levami-
sole for an extended period (HSU, 1980).
Peripheral blood pH, plasma HCO
3
-, BE,
pO
2
, and O
2
SAT increased in both groups
of animals, but the increases in Group A
were not statistically significant. The in-
crease in these values indicates the de-
vel-opment of metabolic alkalosis 48
hours after administration of levamisole.
There was severe vomiting in these ani-
mals which may explain the presence of
metabolic alkalosis in the dogs. Meta-
bolic alkalosis was also reported by
UNSUREN et al. (1995) in dogs after re-
peated administration of tetramisole of
high doses.
In the present study, significant increases
in the concentration of blood urea and the
serum activities of ALT and AP were ob-
tained in both Group A and Group B. The
increase in these values and the presence
of macroscopic lesions on the liver and
kidneys were consistent with several
studies which suggest that levamisole
causes both liver and kidney damage and
affects their function in dogs and humans
(BULUGAHAPITIYA, 1997). On the other
hand, changes in blood transaminases
were found to be minimal in sheep (AB-
DELSALAM, 1986) and were not corre-
lated with the clinical signs caused by va-
rious doses, but a significant increase in
the plasma creatinine phosphokinase and
alkaline phosphatase activity have been
observed in levamisole toxicosis in ani-
mals (HSU, 1980) and in humans (ABDEL-
SALAM, 1986; BULUGAHAPITIYA, 1997).
In conclusion, there were severe nervous
signs, gastric haemorrhage, bloody
vomiting, colic, anaemia and death in
Group A. Atropin sulphate reduced the
severity of the clinical signs, especially
neurological and muscular signs, and the
number of deaths suggesting the presen-
ce of beneficial effects of atropin sulpha-
te in the treatment of levamisole poison-
ing. However it is not alone sufficient to
remedy levamisole poisoning. We there-
fore recommended that in addition to
atropin sulphate to eliminate severe neu-
rological signs, fluid therapy for dehydra-
tion and metabolic alkalosis and suppor-
tive therapy for haemaorrhage and
anaemia should be taken into considera-
tion for the treatment of levamisole poiso-
ning in dogs.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Mrs Catherine
Akca for proof reading the manuscript.
References
ABDELSALAM, E. B. (1986): The effects of levamiso-
le (L-Tetramisole) in domestic animals. Acta. Vet. 36,
23-30. ABDELSALAM, E. B., NOURELHUDA, I. E.
M. (1988): Levamisole-induced resistance to Raillieti-
na tetragona infection in young chicks. Acta. Vet.
Brno. 57, 147-152. BARRIGA, O. O., ANDUJAR, F.
(1988): Limited efficacy of levamisole against adults of
Dirofilaria immitis in a dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
192, 1743-1744. BOUTDOISEAU, G., CADORE, J.
L., FOURNIER, C., GOUNEL, J. M. (1994): Oslerosis
of the dog: diagnostic and therapeutic status. Parasi-
te. 1, 369-378. BULUGAHAPITIYA, D. T. D. (1997):
Liver toxicity in a nephrotic patient treated with leva-
misole. Arch. Dis. Child. 76, 289-291. CARLISLE, C.
H., ATWELL, R. B., ROBINSON, S.
(1984): The effec-
tiveness of levamisole hydrochloride against the
microfilaria of Dirofilaria immitis. Aust. Vet. J. 61, 282-
284. CHABANNE, L., FOURNEL, C., CAUX, C.,
BERNAUD, J., BONNEFOND, C., MONIER, J. C.,
RIGAL, D. (1995): Abnormalities of lymphocyte sub-
sets in canine systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoim-
munity, 22, 1-8. CHAWLEY, G. D., SHAW, I. C.,
JACKSON, F., TURNER, R., LEVON, S. (1993): Le-
vamisole toxicity in fibre goats. Vet. Rec. 25, 627-628.
COLES, G. C., GIORDANO, D. J., TRISCHLER, J.
P. (1989): Efficacy of levamisole against immature and
mature nematodes in goats with induced infections.
Am. J. Vet. Res. 50, 1074-1075. DELORENZO, L.,
STEWART, J. A. (1990): Levamisole toxicity. J. Clin.
Oncol. 8, 365. GOKCE, G. (1996): Tetramisole poi-
soning in a Kangal Dog. (in Turkish, with English ab-
stract). The Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medi-
cine, University of Kafkas. 2, 225-227.
GUERRERO,
J. (1980): Parasite host interactions relative to levami-
sole. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 176, 1163-1165. FLESH,
J., HAREL, W., NELKEN, D. (1982): Immunopotentia-
ting effect of levamisole in the prevention of bovine
mastitis, fetal death and endometritis. Vet. Rec. 111,
56-57. HADDEN, J. W. (1987): Immonutherapy in
the treatment of infectious diseases. In: LISS, A. R.
(Ed.): Immunopharmacology of Infectious Diseases:
Vac-cine Adjuvant and Modulators of Non-Specific
Resistance, Acedemic Press, London, pp.337-349.
HSU, W. H. (1980): Toxicity and drug interactions of
levamisole. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 176, 1166-9.
LOW, R. J. (1980): Levamisole as an immunostimu-
lant. Vet. Rec. 106, 390. MCANULTY, J. F., RUDD,
R. G.
(1985): Thrombocytopenia associated with vac-
cina-tion of a dog with a modified-live paramyxo-
virus vaccine. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 186, 1217-
1219. MOJZISOVA, J., PAULIK, S., BAJOVA, V.,
BARANOVA, D. (1997): Immunomodulatory effect of
levamisole and administration of amitraz in dogs with
uncomplicated generalized demodicosis Vet. Med.
(Praha) 42, 307-311.
MONTGOMERY, R. D., PID-
GEON, G. L. (1986): Levamisole toxicosis in a dog. J.
Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 189, 684-685. MULCAHY, G.,
QUINN, P. J. (1986): A review of immunomodulators
and their application in veterinary medicine. J. Vet.
Pharmacol. Therap. 9, 119-139. NEIGER, R., GA-
SCHEN, F., KAUFMANN, H. (1994): What is your dia-
gnosis? Chronic cough and fever in a female dog.
Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 136, 193-195. QUINN, P.
J. (1990): Mechanisms of action of some immunomo-
dulators used veterinary medicine. Adv. Vet. Scie.
Compath. Med. 35, 43-98. SAYLES, P. C., JACOB-
SON, R. H. (1983): Effects of various anthelmintics on
larval stages of nematospiroides dubius (nematoda).
J. Parasitol. 69, 1079-1083. SHAH, K. K., GULATI,
O. D., HEMAVATHI, K. G.
(1986): Investigation of
some effects of levamisole on dog blood pressure. In-
dian J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 30, 55-62. TARELLO,
W. (2002): Dermatitis associated with Dirofilaria
(Nochtiella) repens microfilariae in dogs from central
Italy. Acta. Vet. Hung. 50, 63-78. TREUTNIET-
DONKER, A. D., JONGH, M. L. M., VAN PUTTEN,
W. L. J. (1987): Levamisole as adjuvant immunothera-
py in breast cancer. Cancer, 59, 1590-1593. UNSU-
REN, H., BAYDAN, E., SANCAK, A., KALINBACAK,
A. (1995): Investigation of toxic effects of tetramisole
in dogs: 1. Its effects on various blood parameters.
(In Turkish, with English abstract). The Journal of the
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ankara,
42, 217-223. URQUHART, G. M., ARMOUR, J.,
DUNCAN, J. L., DUNN, A. M., JENNINGS, F. W.
(1998): Dirofilaria. In Veterinary Parasitology, Second
edition, Blackwell Science, London, pp 88-91.
WATSON, A. D., SANGSTER, N. C., CHURCH, D. B.,
VAN GOGH, H. (1988): Levamisole pharmacokinetics
and bioavailability in dogs. Res. Vet. Sci. 45, 411-413.
WILLARD, M. D., TVEDTEN, H., TURNWALD, G.
H. (1989): In Small Animal Clinical Diagnosis By Labo-
ratory Methods, Mills, L. (ed.). W. B. Saunders Com-
pany, Philadelphia, pp. 18-21.
Address for correspondence:
Dr. H. I. GOKCE, Department of Internal
Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
The University of Kafkas, KARS-36040/
TURKEY
Tel: +90 474 2426889
Fax: +90 474 2426853
E-Mail: devrek@hotmail.com
Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 111, 4988, Heft 2, Februar 2004
85
Originale/Originals
Fallbericht
Diphallus bei einem Deutschen Holsteinkalb
BÄHR, C., DISTL, O.
Institut für Tierzucht und Vererbungsforschung, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
BÄHR, C., DISTL, O. (2004):
Fallbericht Diphallus bei einem Deutschen Holstein-
kalb.
Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 111, 8586
Zusammenfassung
Bei einem Kalb der Rasse Deutsche Holsteins trat ein Diphallus auf. Bei der klinischen
Untersuchung konnten eine Verdopplung der Glans penis, des Corpus penis und der
Urethra, aber keine weiteren Missbildungen festgestellt werden. Eine chromosomale
Anomalie könnte als Ursache für diese kongenitale Anomalie in Frage kommen.
Schlüsselworte: Rind, Deutsche Holsteins, kongenitale Anomalie, Diphallus
BÄHR, C., DISTL, O. (2004):
Case report Diphallus in a German Holstein calf.
Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr. 111, 8586
Summary
A diphallus was found in a German Holstein calf. Clinical examination revealed a dupli-
cation of glans penis, corpus penis and urethra, but no further anomalies were ob-
served. Possibly, this congenital anomaly is caused by a chromosomal aberration.
Key words: Cattle, Deutsche Holsteins, congenital anomaly, diphallus
... Other possible side effects can include vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, loss of consciousness, bradycardia and even death due to respiratory failure is possible (Amir et al., 2013). Laboratory examinations following levamisole administration revealed decreased number of erythrocytes, hemoglobin and increased hematocrit, activity of liver enzymes, urea and creatinine levels in the serum (Gokce et al., 2004). Thus the aims of study were to evaluate the effect of toxic dose of levamisole on hematological parameters, liver and kidney functions in lambs. ...
... Result of this study, showed that ALT, AST and ALP serum levels were higher than Iranian Ghezel sheep breeds and were consistent with those levels measured in Pakistani and Baluchi sheep breeds (Mojabi et al., 2000;Seyed et al., 2015). In an experimental trial in dogs, Gokce et al. (2004) showed on laboratory examinations that levamisole poisoning causes a significant increase in the activity of liver enzymes as well as metabolic alkalosis. Sharma (2006), reported normal range of ALT, AST, and ALP in cattle and there were no statistical significant differences and the same results were recorded by Jezek et al., (2006) in calves. ...
... Adverse effects are linked to a narrow therapeutic index resulting from overdose and activation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, leading to a reduced convulsion threshold, respiratory muscle paralysis, and asphyxia [20 , 21]. No adverse effects were observed in this study; however, symptoms related to levamisole toxicity were documented in some animals [22]. Additionally, symptoms linked to depression, anorexia, seizures, ataxia, and frothy salivation in canines were documented [23]. ...
Article
Analysis of haematological and biochemical parameters monitors animal health and guides diagnosis and treatment. This study compared the haematological and biochemical effects of free and liposomal levamisole given to sheep orally. The study included twenty-one female Curly breed sheep. The animals were divided into three groups: free levamisole (7.5 mg/kg), liposomal levamisole (7.5 mg/kg), and control (physiological serum 7.5 mL/kg). Blood samples were obtained on day (d) 0 (control), d 1, and d 3. Haematological parameters (WBC, RBC, HGB, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW-CV, RDW-SD, and PCT) were assessed utilizing a haematology analyzer, while biochemical parameters (urea, creatinine, AST, ALT, BUN) were evaluated using an autoanalyzer. On d 1, the liposome group exhibited the highest white blood cell measurements. Despite a reduction in PCT values on d 1 within the liposome group, an increase was observed again on d 3. Urea levels on d 1 and 3 were elevated in the control, liposomal levamisole, and free levamisole groups. On d 3, creatinine measurements indicated that levels in the control group were significantly elevated compared to those in the liposomal levamisole and free levamisole groups. On d 3, BUN measurements indicated that the mean for the control group was significantly elevated compared to the liposomal levamisole and free levamisole groups. The Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, and Monocyte counts in the liposomal and free levamisole groups of animals were significantly elevated compared to other measurements recorded on the d 3. This study’s findings demonstrate that liposomes affect haematological and biochemical parameters. The results demonstrate that liposomal levamisole causes no harmful effects on animals. It produces advantageous results. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate the effects of Liposomal Levamisole on hematological and biochemical parameters among various animal species.
... 22 It has also been reported that oral administration of LVM at a dose of 25 mg/kg for three consecutive days caused toxicity in beagles, characterized by a significant decrease in total red blood cell (RBC) count and an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity. 23 However, no changes in these indicators were observed in this experiment. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Given the limitations and adverse effects of current rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments, there is an urgent need for safer and more effective therapeutic options. Levamisole (LVM) is a non-specific immunomodulator with potential for treating skin diseases, tumors, and autoimmune disorders. Recognizing LVM’s potential despite its controversial reputation, this study aimed to investigate its safety profile and therapeutic efficacy towards RA. Methods To evaluate the potential toxicity of LVM, a 28-day oral administration was conducted in SD rats, assessing general toxicity and neurotoxicity using serum biochemical indicators, the Morris water maze test, transmission electron microscopy, and H&E staining. Subsequently, the therapeutic effects of LVM on RA were evaluated. Results The results showed that 30 mg/kg LVM has promising therapeutic effects in the treatment of RA with negligible toxicity from 45 mg/kg to 180 mg/kg. Discussions This study provides valuable preclinical data on the safety and efficacy of LVM, laying the groundwork for future clinical applications and potentially offering a safer and more effective treatment option for RA patients.
... It has been reported that a single intraperitoneal injection of LVM can cause a signi cant increase in lymphocyte count and neutrophil count after inducing pleurisy (Kuropka et al. 2022). It has been reported that oral administration of LVM at a dose of 25 mg/kg for three consecutive days caused toxicity in beagles, characterized by a signi cant decrease in total red blood cell (RBC) count and an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity (Gokce et al. 2004). However, no changes in these indicators were observed in this experiment. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Backgrounds: Levamisole (LVM) is a non-specific immunomodulator with potential for treating skin conditions, tumors, and autoimmune disorders. However, the widespread reports of neurotoxicity caused by LVM as a cutting agent for cocaine have led to public panic and restricted its clinical use. Methods: To investigate the potential toxicity of LVM and evaluate its effects in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), we conducted a 28-day oral administration study in SD rats, and assessed general toxicity and neurotoxicity via serum biochemical indicators, the Morris water maze test, transmission electron microscopy, and H&E staining. Subsequently, we evaluated the therapeutic effects of LVM on RA. Results: In the LVM toxicity study, there were no significant differences in the histopathological slices, serum biochemical tests, and behavioral experiments of the treatment group compared to the control group; in the study of treating RA, LVM not only significantly improved the bone and joint erosion in rats induced by adjuvant, but also significantly reduced synovial hyperplasia and infiltration of inflammatory cells Conclusions: This study showed that LVM has promising therapeutic effects in treating RA with negligible toxicity, and offer valuable insights for the clinical use of LVM in treating RA.
... and 25.79 ± 0.46%, respectively. In the case of high-dose poisoning of dogs by Levamisole, a decrease in RBC and HGB values was observed by Gokce et al. (2004). ...
Article
Full-text available
Anti-helminthic drugs (Albendazole and Levamisole) trials were conducted on Indian Peafowls (n = 20) kept at Jallo Wildlife Park, Lahore, Pakistan for 15. Sampling was conducted on days 7 and 15 of treatments. The results showed that the WBC count was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in both samples in response to Levamisole treatment. Haemoglobin (HGB) and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) concentration increased significantly (P < 0.05) in response to both treatments; however, Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) decreased significantly (P < 0.05) in Albendazole-treated birds on both the sampling days compared to the control. Red Blood Cell Distribution Width-Standard Deviation (RDW-SD) decreased significantly (P < 0.05) in all treatment groups. On the other hand, the prevalence of eggs per gram (EPG) was reduced by 20% after the application of Levamisole on days 7 and 15. It was concluded that both drugs had significant effects on WBCs, HGB, MCH, MCHC and RDW-SD.
... Due to their labeled use as an anthelminthic in dogs, fenbendazole and febantel are the recommended treatments for C. vulpis (Bihr and Conboy, 1999). Though effective, levamisole demonstrates a narrower safety margin compared to the benzimidazoles and is not currently recommended for use in treatment of this lungworm (Gokce et al., 2004). However, more studies should be performed to investigate proper dosing intervals and total treatment period of the available effective anthelminthics. ...
Article
Crenosoma vulpis, the fox lungworm, is a helminth parasite endemic to the fox population of New England. Domestic dogs are susceptible to infection via ingestion of snails and slugs. Two dogs from New England were diagnosed with C. vulpis. The predominant clinical sign in both dogs was a chronic cough. Treatment with steroids and antibiotics only temporarily relieved clinical signs. Thoracic radiographs in both dogs revealed bronchial patterns. Endotracheal washes were performed in each dog revealing marked, mixed inflammation consisting mainly of neutrophils with eosinophils in lesser numbers. Helminth larvae could also be visualized on cytology. A fecal flotation revealed helminth larvae in one dog but failed to identify larvae in the second dog. The diagnosis of C. vulpis was confirmed via PCR analysis and sequencing of samples from both endotracheal washes. One dog was treated with fenbendazole (50 mg/kg PO q24h for 14 days), enrofloxacin (13 mg/kg PO q 24 h for 5 days), and a tapering protocol of prednisone (20 mg PO q12h for 5 days, 20 mg PO q24h for 5 days, then 20 mg PO q48h for 10 days). The second dog was treated with fenbendazole (50 mg/kg PO q24h for 10 days) with an additional 7 days of febantel and two doses of milbemycin, achieving complete resolution of clinical signs. This lungworm is becoming increasingly more prevalent in domestic dogs worldwide and may be more prevalent in New England than previously thought. Veterinary practitioners of New England should include this respiratory helminth as a differential in dogs with respiratory signs, and respiratory washes and Baermann fecal examinations are warranted in dogs presenting with non-specific respiratory clinical signs.
... Plumb (1999) reported pulmonary edema and allergic skin reactions in dogs and death due to respiratory failure in dogs given overdose of levamisole. Hematological changes like erythrocytopenia, decreased hemoglobin and haematocrit as well as increased activity of liver enzymes and urea were reported in dogs poisoned with levamisole (Gokce et al., 2004). ...
... To evaluate the possibility of detrimental effects on dogs' health, haematology and serum biochemistry were studied after three exposures to levamisole. In an experimental study on dogs, Gokce et al. (2004) found a decrease in haemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cell numbers, as well as an increase of urea, alkaline phosphatase, and alanine aminotransferase after a levamisole dose of 25 mg/kg repeated for 3 days. Thus, after the second reinforcement on day 30, blood samples were obtained from all the dogs, including controls. ...
Article
Full-text available
Worldwide, predators and humans are in conflict for resources such as game species or livestock, especially in the case of wild canids. One non-lethal method to reduce predation is conditioned food aversion (CFA), in which animals learn to avoid a food due to the illness after ingestion, caused by the addition of an undetected chemical compound. CFA can be enhanced by adding an artificial odour cue, in a process known as taste-potentiated odour aversion (TPOA). We tested CFA and TPOA with three experimental groups of penned dogs. Food was offered with a combination of microencapsulated levamisole + vanilla odour (ODO), microencapsulated levamisole (LEV), or plain food as a control. The aims were (a) to test whether dogs detected the microencapsulated levamisole, (b) to analyse the strength and extinction time of CFA induced by microencapsulated levamisole, and (c) to analyse the strength and extinction time of TPOA. Two-choice tests were carried out during 11 post-conditioning months, and two reinforcements with microencapsulated levamisole were performed during the first post-conditioning month. In the first post-conditioning test, ODO and LEV groups ate significantly less untreated food than control group. After reinforcement, the dogs in LEV group resumed eating the food. Three of four dogs in ODO group showed long-lasting CFA until the 11th month. These results show that TPOA could be used to induce odour aversion on canids and that the odour cue overshadows the slight bitter taste of microencapsulated levamisole. These results show TPOA as a promising tool to reduce predation by wild canids.
Article
Full-text available
A flock comprising of fifty-five animals where dewormed with high dose of levomesole @ above 20 ml (3-4 times the normal dose) by the farmer without prior consultation of concerned veterinarian. After administration of the drug, toxicity symptoms like depression, anorexia, seizures, atexia and frothy salivation were observed in 35 animals. Out of these 35 animals, 17 did not respond to treatment and died within five days. Line of treatment given was intravenous fluids, liver tonics and dexona which resulted in amelioration and eventual recovery of these morbid animals. Case history and observations A flock comprising of about fifty-five animals was administered high dose of levomesole 6.78 % @ above 20 ml (3-4 times the normal dose) by the farmer without prescription. The flock was immediately attended by a team headed by veterinary Assistant surgeon. The team observed that about thirty-five animals were severely affected. The clinical observed were depression, anorexia, seizures, atexia, abdominal breathing and drooling of frothy salivation. The postmortem findings observed were discoloration along with swelling of liver besides severe congestion of lungs (Fig 1 and 2). The kidneys presented petechial haemorrages. Treatment Keeping in view the history, clinical signs and postmortem findings animals were treated with fluids, liver tonics and dexona. Despite treating whole flock only 18 animals survived whereas17 animals did not respond to treatment. High mortality rate of 48.57 in the present study was due to late reporting of farmer and high anthalmentic dose drenched to lambs having low body weight. However, the animals which survived were possessing good body conformation and relatively higher body weight. Discussion Levamisole is an anthelmentic of imidazothiazole class with immunostimulant property. Recommended dose rate of levamisole is 7.5 mg/kg once orally. The adverse effects of levamisole overdose are attributed to narrow therapeutic index and stimulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and subsequent reduction in convulsion threshold (Rehni and Singh, 2010), and paralysis of respiratory muscles and asphyxia 35
Article
Full-text available
Sheep flock of about 138 animals got toxicity after administration of high dose of Levob (levamisole, albendazole and selenium) by the farmer on recommendations of a Para-vet. Clinical signs presented by the flock included congested mucous membrane, depression, anorexia, seizures, ataxia and drooling of saliva. Overall 17 deaths were observed in the flock including 12 deaths prior treatment and 5 deaths during treatment. Post-mortem examination of died animals revealed petechial haemorrhages on kidneys, congestion of liver and lung, haemorrhages on epicardium with moderate congestion of small intestine. Recovery of rest flock occurred after the animals were treated with DNS, Avil and Dexona for 3 days. It is concluded that self-medication or getting animals treated by is Para-vets is a nuisance resulting in high economic losses to poor farmers.
Article
Full-text available
A b s t r a c t A b d e l s a I a m E.B., I.E.M. N 0 u r e I h u d a: Levamisole-induced Resistance to Raillietina tetragona in Young Chicks. Acta vet. Brno, 57, 1988:141-152. The repeated pre-treatment with levamisole (L-tetramiso1e) was found to induce significant resistance to Raillietina tetragona infection in 7 day old chicks. A total of 6 twice weekly oral doses of 2.5 mg/kg reduced the parasitic burden from 40% in primarily infected controls (n = 10) to 13% in levamisole-treated chicks (n = 10). Resistance to B. tetragona was also observed in reinfected chicks (n = 9) when the intia1 infection was subsequently treated with niclosamide (Yomesan, 100 mg/kg). In this respect, the parasitic burden was reduced to 20%. In addition, a further reduction to 8.8% of the parasitic burden was obtained in reinfected chicks (n = 9) when they were also treated with levamisole at 6 twice weekly doses of 2.5 mg before challenge. The increased resistance of the young chicks to R. tetragona infection and/or reinfection was attributed to the immunomodulatory action of levamisole. Raillietina tetragona (cestode), chicks, Levamisole, resistance. The imidazole compound levamisole (L-tetramisole) has enjoyed considerable interest in veterinary medicine due to its broad spectrum anthelmintic activity and non-specific immunomodulatory effect (A b del s a I a m 1986). The latter property was initially discovered by R e n 0 u x and R e n 0 u x (1971) and further substantiated by numerous investigations and reports (J a n sse n 1976; S Y moe n s and R 0 sen t h a I 1977; R e n 0 u x 1978; B run n e r and Mus cop I a t 1980; Guo r r e r 0 1980; M u I g a h y and Qui n n 1986). However, the use of levamisole in poultry was still limited to its anthehelmintic efficacy against certain parasitic nematodes including Ascaridia, Capillaria and Heterakis spp. (C 1 ark son and Beg 1970; A I t a i f 1972; Pan k a v i s h et al. 1973). The modulatory effect of 1evamisole upon the avian immune system has not been apparently investigated and the present report, therefore, describes the effect of 1evamisole pre-treatment on the susceptibility to Raillietina tetragona infection in young chicks. The parasite belongs to the cestode group which does not normally respond to the chemotherapeutic action of the drug.
Article
The immunomodulatory effect of levamisole (Decaris tbl.) in the course of acaricide therapy with amitraz (Taktic) on the functional activity of blood neutrophils (% of phagocytizing cells and ingestion capacity) and lymphocytes (blastogenic response to Con A) in dogs with uncomplicated generalized demodicosis (NGD) was studied. The level of examined parameters was evaluated before treatment, week 3 and 7 after the first application of these preparations; and compared with the values of NGD dogs treated only with amitraz and with those in clinically healthy dogs. In comparison with healthy dogs the initial level of examined activities of both cell populations was significantly depresed. A significantly earlier (4 weeks earlier) increase (when compared with values before treatment) of investigated activities of neutrophils and lymphocytes occurred in dogs treated with amitraz and levamisole in comparison with those in dogs treated only with amitraz. It was manifested especially significantly in phagocytosis, the ingestion capacity of neutrophils at this time of therapy has reached the level of those in healthy dogs. Functional activity of lymphocytes in both groups of NGD dogs has not reached a comparable value with that in healthy dogs either at the end of observation. The presented results indicate that significantly earlier improvement of functional activity of phagocytes and lymphocytes in demodectic dogs treated with amitraz and levamisole was connected with the immunorestorative effect of levamisole.
Article
Results are reported of a double-blind randomized study on 198 patients with resectable node positive mammary cancer, evaluating the effect of the immune modulating drug levamisole in an adjuvant setting. Drug treatment was started after completion of postoperative radiotherapy. In a two-arm trial 97 patients used levamisole and 101 patients used a placebo. No difference was noted in overall survival and disase-free survival between the two groups. Toxicity was reason for discontinuation of the drug in 30 of 97 of the patients in the levamisole group and 8/101 in the placebo group.
Article
To the Editor: Levamisole use will no doubt increase following the recent report by Laurie et al and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Clinical Alert both related to the use of levamisole/fluorouracil (5-FU) as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. Toxicity of levamisole is generally described as mild with nausea, diarrhea, and leukopenia being the most significant adverse effects with fatigue, dermatitis, and stomatitis also seen. Depsite the generally mild nature of the toxicity, occasional patients experience enough side effects to cause discontinuation of therapy. We report a patient with an unusual levamisole toxicity that resulted in discontinuation of the drug. A 47-year-old woman with node-positive colon cancer agreed to randomization in a clinical trial (EST 2284, Intergroup-0035) evaluating levamisole versus levamisole with 5-FU. She received levamisole 50 mg orally three times a day every 2 weeks and 5-FU 450 mg/m ² weekly. In the fifth month of treatment, she experienced the onset of bilateral arm pain occurring late in the first day of levamisole and resolving by 24 hours after the last dose. These symptoms also occurred with the next course of levamisole. Clinical examination showed upper arm pain with aching and stiffness in the wrists and fingers. Forearm muscles were tender, but there was no joint inflammation. There was no fever, rash, mucositis, leukopenia, or eosinophilia. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 8 mm/hr, creatine kinase 31 U/L, and antinuclear antibodies less than 1:20. The next course of levamisole resulted in similar but more severe pain with significant disruption of the patient's work as a florist. 5-FU alone was continued with no recurrence of these symptoms. Three years later the patient is well without pain or evidence for recurrent tumor. This symptom complex is clearly related to the levamisole treatment and might be considered a variant of the "flu-like" symptoms reported in other levamisole trials. We suggest that clinicians using levamisole in randomized trials or without the NCI Group C mechanism be aware of the wide spectrum of toxicities that may be seen with this interesting drug for the purpose of pretreatment discussion with patients and for the monitoring of therapy. The last sentence of the letter-to-the-editor entitled "Levamisole Toxicity" by Drs Leonard DeLorenza and James A. Stewart, published in the February 1990 issue (J Clin Oncol 8:365, 1990) contained an error. The sentence should have read: "We suggest that clinicians using levamisole in randomized trials or within the NCI Group C mechanism be aware of the wide spectrum of toxicities that may be seen with this interesting drug for the purpose of pretreatment discussion with patients and for the monitoring of therapy."
Article
Anthelmintic efficacy of levamisole against induced infections with 7- and 21-day-old Haemonchus contortus, Ostertagia circumcincta, Trichostrongylus axei, and T colubriformis was evaluated as an oral drench in goats. Group 1 (n = 8) was not treated, group 2 (n = 8) was given 3.96 mg of levamisole/kg of body weight, group 3 (n = 8) was given 7.92 mg of levamisole/kg, and group 3 (n = 7) was given 11.88 mg of levamisole/kg. Efficacy against all worms was low in goats given 3.96 mg of levamisole/kg, but was high against adult H contortus (99%) and adult T colubriformis (99.7%) in goats given 7.92 mg of levamisole/kg. Although efficacy against adults of all species was high in goats given 11.88 mg of levamisole/kg, some immature worms of all species remained in the abomasa of goats.
Article
The effects of levamisole were investigated on the blood pressure of anaesthetized dog. Levamisole (0.5 to 4.0 mg/kg) elicited a biphasic effect, an initial brief depressor response followed by a pressor response. The pressor response was dose-related and was blocked by phenoxybenzamine. The residual depressor response was blocked by propranolol. Repeated administration of a high dose of levamisole produced tachyphylaxis. The pressor response to levamisole was not modified by either reserpinization, acute bilateral adrenalectomy or pretreatment with cocaine, whereas pretreatment with dexamethasone, nialamide or pyroaallol shifted the dose-response curve to the right. Levamisole potentiated the pressor responses to noradrenaline, angiotensin and acetylcholine. The effects of levamisole are ascribed to inhibition of monoamine oxidase, catechol-O-methyl transferase, catecholamine uptake2 mechanism and cholinesterase.
Article
Levamisole was given intravenously and orally (with and without food) to six dogs. All dogs reacted adversely to intravenous dosage and one died. For the remaining five, intravenous data fitted a one compartment model with first order elimination and a mean half-time of elimination of 1.8 hours. In fasting dogs drug absorption from the gut was rapid and the mean fraction absorbed (F) was 0.64. When levamisole was given with food, drug bioavailability was impaired, as absorption was slowed and possibly reduced (F = 0.49). The effect of ingesta on bioavailability of levamisole could affect treatment efficacy and side effects.
Article
A dog with chronic dirofilariasis (Dirofilaria immitis) was given 15 doses of 12 or 24 mg of levamisole/kg of body weight in 6 treatments within 96 days. Concentration of microfilariae in the blood was determined before and after treatment, and Aedes triseriatus mosquitoes were fed on the dog 1 to 5 days after each treatment and examined for D immitis larvae. Several adult worms were recovered from the dog 160 days after the end of the treatments.