Article

An evaluation of the effectiveness of forward facing child restraint systems

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Blvd, 3535 TraumaLink, 10th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Accident Analysis & Prevention (Impact Factor: 1.87). 08/2004; 36(4):585-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00065-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of forward facing child restraint systems (FFCRS) in preventing serious injury and hospitalization to children 12-47 months of age as compared with similar age children in seat belts. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study of children aged 12-47 months in crashes of insured vehicles in 15 states, with data collected via insurance claims records and a telephone survey. Effectiveness estimates were limited to those children between 12 and 47 months of age seated in the back row(s) of vehicles, restrained in FFCRS, regardless of misuse, or seat belts of all types and usage. Completed survey information was obtained on 1207 children, representing 12632 children in 11619 crashes between 1 December 1998 and 31 May 2002. Serious injuries occurred to 0.47% of all 12-47-month olds studied, including 1.72% of those in seat belts and 0.39% of those in child restraint systems. The risk of serious injury was 78% lower for children in FFCRS than in seat belts (odds ratio (OR) = 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.11-0.45, P = 0.001). The risk of hospitalization was 79% lower for children in FFCRS than in seat belts (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.09-050, P = 0.001). There was no difference between the restraint types in preventing minor injuries. As compared with seat belts, CRS are very highly effective in preventing serious injuries and hospitalization, respectively. This effectiveness estimate is substantially higher than older estimates, demonstrating the benefits of current CRS designs. These results provide those educating parents and caregivers population-based data on the importance of child restraint use.

1 Follower
 · 
23 Reads
  • Source
    • "Unfortunately , non-medical professionals provide the injury assessment in many studies [10] [12] [13]. As a result, some types of head injuries are excluded from evaluation [12]. Head injuries are the most common type of injury sustained by children in MVCs and have been identified as a target of injury prevention [4] [14] [15]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We observed a high incidence of traumatic brain injuries (TBI) in properly restrained infants involved in higher speed motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). We hypothesized that car safety seats are inadequately protecting infants from TBI. We retrospectively queried scene crash data from our State Department of Transportation (2007-2011) and State Department of Public Health data (2000-2011) regarding infants who presented to a trauma center after MVC. Department of Transportation data revealed 94% of infants in MVCs were properly restrained (782/833) with average speed of 44.6 miles/h when there was concern for injury. Department of Public Health data showed only 67/119 (56.3%) of infants who presented to a trauma center after MVC were properly restrained. Properly restrained infants were 12.7 times less likely to present to a trauma center after an MVC (OR=12.7, CI 95% 5.6-28.8, p<0.001). TBI was diagnosed in 73/119 (61.3%) infants; 42/73 (57.5%) properly restrained, and 31/73 (42.5%) improperly/unrestrained (p=0.34). Average head abbreviated injury scale was similar for properly restrained (3.2±0.2) and improperly/unrestrained infants (3.5±0.2, p=0.37). Car safety seats prevent injuries. However, TBI is similar among properly restrained and improperly/unrestrained infants involved in higher speed MVCs who present to a trauma center.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014 · Journal of Pediatric Surgery
  • Source
    • "Unintentional injuries due to motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) are the leading cause of death and long-term disability between the ages of 4–14 years [1] [2]. When properly installed, child safety seats have been shown to reduce the risk of childhood injury by 71% to 82% and death by 28% relative to seat belts alone [3] [4] [5] [6]. Within the subset of four-to eightyear olds, booster seats reduced the risk of nonfatal injury by 45% relative to seat belts alone [7]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: . Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death among US children aged 4-14 years. In theory, health provider counseling about Child Passenger Safety (CPS) could be a useful deterrent. The data about the effectiveness of CPS dissemination is sparse, but existing results suggest that providers are not well informed. Moreover, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether provider counseling about CPS is effective. . We therefore assessed CPS best practice knowledge among 217 healthcare workers at hospitals in seven cities throughout the USA and evaluated the impact of a brief, lunch and learn educational intervention with a five-item questionnaire. Attendees were comprised of physicians, nurses, social workers, pediatric residents, and pediatric trauma response teams. . Pre-post survey completion was nearly 100% (216 of 217 attendees). Participation was fairly evenly distributed according to age (18-29, 30-44, and 45+ years). More than 80% of attendees were women. Before intervention, only 4% of respondents (9/216) answered all five questions correctly; this rose to 77% (167/216) ( < 0.001, using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test) after intervention. . Future research should consider implementation and controlled testing of comparable educational programs to determine if they improve dissemination of CPS best practice recommendations in the long term.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2013 · International Journal of Pediatrics
    • "The incorrect use of child restraints by young motor vehicle occupants is a widespread problem that results in reduced crash protection (Arbogast et al., 2004; Bilston et al., 2007; Brown and Bilston, 2007; Bulger et al., 2008; Du et al., 2008; Lesire et al., 2007; Valent and McGwin, 2002). Removing barriers to optimum crash protection is necessary to facilitate reductions in child passenger casualties. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the effectiveness of the NSW Restraint Fitting Station Network in preventing incorrect use of rearward facing and forward facing child restraints. The way children used restraints was observed randomly as they arrived at observation sites during a cross-sectional ecological study across New South Wales, Australia. Trained researchers examined restraint system installation once the child left the vehicle. A structured interview was also conducted with the driver. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between parental report of ever having the restraint checked at a Restraint Fitting Station and whether or not the restraint was used correctly, while controlling for potential confounders and accounting for the complex sample design. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The results demonstrated that children of respondents who did not use Restraint Fitting Stations were 1.8 times more likely to be incorrectly using their restraints (95% CI 1.1-2.8) than children of Restraint Fitting Station users. Regardless of whether or not a Restraint Fitting Station had been used, there was a trend towards a greater likelihood of incorrect restraint use as the length of restraint ownership increased (OR 1.3 95% CI 1.0-1.7). These results are important for developing strategies aimed at reducing child occupant casualties by reducing the rate of incorrect restraint use, and support programs encouraging the use of Restraint Fitting Stations and similar services as a countermeasure to incorrect use.
    No preview · Article · May 2011 · Accident; analysis and prevention
Show more