Article

The Effect of Physical Height on Workplace Success and Income: Preliminary Test of a Theoretical Model

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Journal of Applied Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.31). 07/2004; 89(3):428-41. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.428
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

In this article, the authors propose a theoretical model of the relationship between physical height and career success. We then test several linkages in the model based on a meta-analysis of the literature, with results indicating that physical height is significantly related to measures of social esteem (rho =.41), leader emergence (rho =.24), and performance (rho =.18). Height was somewhat more strongly related to success for men (rho =.29) than for women (rho =.21), although this difference was not significant. Finally, given that almost no research has examined the relationship between individuals' physical height and their incomes, we present four large-sample studies (total N = 8,590) showing that height is positively related to income (beta =.26) after controlling for sex, age, and weight. Overall, this article presents the most comprehensive analysis of the relationship of height to workplace success to date, and the results suggest that tall individuals have advantages in several important aspects of their careers and organizational lives.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Daniel M. Cable, Jun 05, 2014
  • Source
    • "It is generally believed that taller people are seen to be more attractive and persuasive. Recent studies have hoped to confirm this suggestion, withJudge and Cable (2004)assessing the impact of height on success at work and salary. They suggest firstly that height is related to social esteem or the status ascribed to individuals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigated the link between handgrip strength and self-rated physical attractiveness, sexual history, and social characteristics in 145 male university students. Handgrip strength correlated with both height and weight, as well as self-perceived happiness, health, social confidence overall physical attractiveness, and overall number of sexual partners. It also correlated with self-assessed physical fitness levels and there was a predictable link between handgrip strength and age of first sexual intercourse. It is argued that handgrip strength is an indicator of both genetic quality and developmental health. Limitations of the study are acknowledged.
    Preview · Article · Jan 2016
  • Source
    • "Consistent with these differences between strength and height, the observed associations of height with status outcomes diverge in some important ways from the logic of our hypotheses. For example, height appears to be positively associated with perceived intelligence, perceived leadership ability, and actual occupational success among both men and women (Blaker et al., 2013; Blaker & Van Vugt, 2014; Judge & Cable, 2004; Murray & Schmitz, 2011). Our hypotheses regarding formidability-based status allocation only predict certain of these associations. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Why are physically formidable men willingly allocated higher social status by others in cooperative groups? Ancestrally, physically formidable males would have been differentially equipped to generate benefits for groups by providing leadership services of within-group enforcement (e.g., implementing punishment of free riders) and between-group representation (e.g., negotiating with other coalitions). Therefore, we hypothesize that adaptations for social status allocation are designed to interpret men's physical formidability as a cue to these leadership abilities, and to allocate greater status to formidable men on this basis. These hypotheses were supported in 4 empirical studies wherein young adults rated standardized photos of subjects (targets) who were described as being part of a white-collar business consultancy. In Studies 1 and 2, male targets' physical strength positively predicted ratings of their projected status within the organization, and this effect was mediated by perceptions that stronger men possessed greater leadership abilities of within-group enforcement and between-group representation. Moreover, (a) these same patterns held whether status was conceptualized as overall ascendancy, prestige-based status, or dominance-based status, and (b) strong men who were perceived as aggressively self-interested were not allocated greater status. Finally, 2 experiments established the causality of physical formidability's effects on status-related perceptions by manipulating targets' relative strength (Study 3) and height (Study 4). In interpreting our findings, we argue that adaptations for formidability-based status allocation may have facilitated the evolution of group cooperation in humans and other primates. (PsycINFO Database Record
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Source
    • "This legitimacy, however, may not always be beneficial in terms of leading performance if leader's demographic features are in question solely. Features such as gender (Eagly et al. 1995; Thompson 2000) and height or age (Judge and Cable 2004; Stogdill 1974) are not always related to leadership effectiveness. An interesting event is that some scholars have tried to step out the legitimacy issue entirely while considering leader emergence. "
    [Show description] [Hide description]
    DESCRIPTION: According to the literature, science of management has started to become a jungle since 1960s. With the addition of many post-modern concepts, this jungle has turned into a much complex structure. A striking point is that a similar complexity is witnessed about a related subject – leadership. A focal point of this current study is leadership within the contingency approach, precisely the issue of preferring leadership in ever-changing situations. There are many different leadership approaches and some emphasize situational changes, and all these may be related with the other focal point of this study: Motivation to lead (MTL) – i.e., the person’s willingness to claim and continue the role of leadership. The current study strives to uncover whether this willingness affects leadership preference in different situations. The results show that MTL can not fully affect leadership preference, albeit there is a partial effect.
    Full-text · Research · Jul 2015
Show more