ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The drag (D) of seven (7) male swimmers wearing five (5) swimsuits was investigated. The drag was measured during passive surface tows at speeds from 0.2 up to 2.2 m x s and during starts and push-offs. The swimsuits varied in body coverage from shoulder-to-ankle (SA), shoulder-to-knee (SK), waist-to-ankle (WA) and waist-to-knee (WK) and briefs (CS). Differences in total drag among the suits were small, but significant. In terms of least drag at 2.2 m x s, the swimsuits ranked: SK, SA, WA, WK and CS. The drag was decomposed into its pressure drag (DP), skin friction drag (DSF) and wave drag (DW) components using nonlinear regression and classical formulations for each drag component. The transition-to-turbulence Reynolds number and decreasing frontal area with speed were taken into account. The transition-to-turbulence Reynolds number location was found to be very close to the swimmers' "leading edge," i.e. the head. Flow was neither completely laminar, nor completely turbulent; but rather, it was transitional over most of the body. The DP contributed the most to drag at low speeds (<1.0 m x s) and DW the least at all speeds. DSF contributed the most at higher speeds for SA and SK suits, whereas DP and DW were reduced compared with the other suits. The decomposition of swimmer drag into DSF, DP and DW suggests that increasing DSF on the upper-body of a swimmer reduces DP and DW by tripping the boundary layer and attaching the flow to the body from the shoulder to the knees. It is possible that body suits that cover the torso and legs may reduce drag and improve performance of swimmers.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Effect of Swim Suit Design on Passive Drag
JOSEPH C. MOLLENDORF
1–3
, ALBERT C. TERMIN II
4
, ERIC OPPENHEIM
2
, and DAVID R. PENDERGAST
1,3
1
Center for Research and Education in Special Environments;
2
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering,
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences;
3
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine and
Biomedical Sciences; and
4
Division of Athletics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
ABSTRACT
MOLLENDORF, J. C., A. C. TERMIN II, E. OPPENHEIM, and D. R. PENDERGAST. Effect of Swim Suit Design on Passive Drag.
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 1029–1035, 2004. Introduction: The drag (D) of seven (7) male swimmers wearing five
(5) swimsuits was investigated. Methods: The drag was measured during passive surface tows at speeds from 0.2 up to 2.2 m·s
1
and
during starts and push-offs. The swimsuits varied in body coverage from shoulder-to-ankle (SA), shoulder-to-knee (SK), waist-to-ankle
(WA) and waist-to-knee (WK) and briefs (CS). Results: Differences in total drag among the suits were small, but significant. In terms
of least drag at 2.2 m·s
1
, the swimsuits ranked: SK, SA, WA, WK and CS. The drag was decomposed into its pressure drag (D
P
),
skin friction drag (D
SF
) and wave drag (D
W
) components using nonlinear regression and classical formulations for each drag
component. The transition-to-turbulence Reynolds number and decreasing frontal area with speed were taken into account. The
transition-to-turbulence Reynolds number location was found to be very close to the swimmers’ “leading edge,” i.e. the head. Flow was
neither completely laminar, nor completely turbulent; but rather, it was transitional over most of the body. The D
P
contributed the most
to drag at low speeds (1.0 m·s
1
) and D
W
the least at all speeds. D
SF
contributed the most at higher speeds for SA and SK suits,
whereas D
P
and D
W
were reduced compared with the other suits. Conclusion: The decomposition of swimmer drag into D
SF
,D
P
and
D
W
suggests that increasing D
SF
on the upper-body of a swimmer reduces D
P
and D
W
by tripping the boundary layer and attaching
the flow to the body from the shoulder to the knees. It is possible that body suits that cover the torso and legs may reduce drag and
improve performance of swimmers. Key Words: FRICTION DRAG, PASSIVE DRAG, WAVE DRAG, TURBULENT FLOW,
LAMINAR FLOW
Swimming performance is measured to the nearest
0.01 s, with swimmers in the top 16 of meets sepa-
rated by only 0.10 s. Because drag is a major factor in
the energetics of swimming, small decreases in the swim-
mer’s drag can affect performance. With the availability of
a new generation of suits that cover larger parts of the body
and are made of different materials than the traditional suits,
there is a potential for drag reduction. These new suits are
reported, in a nonrefereed swim magazine, to reduce skin
friction of the material itself (without a swimmer) by 16%
and by 10% when worn by a swimmer (17). A Lycra
specially designed suit covering the torso of male swimmers
reduced the energy demand of swimming, compared with a
standard racing suit, presumably due to the drag-reducing
characteristic of the suit (14). The opinion that these new
suits improve performance is, however, not universally ac-
cepted. It was concluded (based on active drag measure-
ments and a statistical analysis of performance times), in
another nonrefereed swim magazine (11) that these types of
suits do not reduce drag or improve performance.
It is well known that surface characteristics have an effect
on fluid mechanical drag. In general, the effect of uniformly
distributed surface roughness is to decrease the transition-
to-turbulence Reynolds number. This will increase skin-
friction drag because turbulent skin-friction drag is higher
than laminar skin-friction drag. The same is true for single
protuberances with height a fraction of the boundary layer
thickness. Surface roughness and protuberances may alter
transition-to-turbulence on the swimmer, and may attenuate
overall drag.
The purpose of this study was to combine theoretical
models with passive drag measurements to determine
whether these new generation suits are drag reducing, and if
so, what the physical mechanisms behind the reduction are.
Passive drag was used to concentrate on the effects of the
suit alone, and not the swimmer technique or style.
METHODS
Seven male University Division I swimmers participated
in this study. They average 20.2 0.5 yr of age, 171 12
cm in height, 71.80 1.66 kg in weight, 51.3 0.9 cm in
chest width, 25.4 0.4 cm in chest depth, and 8 1% body
fat. The study was approved by the University’s Institutional
Review Board; subjects completed a medical history, were
given a physical examination, and completed an informed
consent form.
Address for correspondence: Joseph C. Mollendorf, Ph.D., Center for
Research and Education in Special Environments, 124 Sherman Hall,
University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214; E-mail: molendrf@buffalo.edu.
Submitted for publication February 2003.
Accepted for publication February 2004.
0195-9131/04/3606-1029
MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE
®
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Sports Medicine
DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000128179.02306.57
1029
Four swimsuits that covered various body surface areas
(Fastskin by Speedo) and a traditional competition suit
(Speedo) were purchased commercially for each swimmer,
and their drags were determined and compared. These suits
also represented the suits most commonly purchased by
competitive swimmers (personal communication from
Adolph Kiefer and associates). The body surface areas cov-
ered were shoulder-to-ankle (SA), shoulder-to-knee (SK),
waist-to-ankle (WA), and waist-to-knee (WK). The suits
were made of microfiber polyester and Lycra material.
All testing was done with the suits initially dry, and the
order of the suits in testing was randomly assigned for
each swimmer. All of the swimmers wore a conventional
swimming cap.
The densities of the swimsuits were determined using
standard densitometric techniques. The suits, when dry,
were weighed in air and then placed into a press device to
eliminate any air, and then were weighed in water while
still in the press. This technique was repeated with the
suits after they were immersed in water (while wet) by
the same techniques.
Measured Towing Drag
Two sets of drag measurements were taken, passive tow-
ing at the surface in an annular pool 58.6 m in circumfer-
ence, over the path of the swimmer, and 2.5-m wide and
2.5-m deep and during starts and turns in a standard Olym-
pic pool. Both starts and turns were considered separately,
because the initial speeds of each are different and the starts
involve motion in air and water. The pool temperatures were
maintained at 28°C0.2°C with the air temperature at
22°C2.0°C.
For the towing experiments, the swimmers were towed
passively at the water surface. The swimmer held onto a
handle that was attached by a wire through pulleys to a
vertically mounted dynamometer (Model TDC 4A, Schae-
vitiz Engineering, Pennsauken, NJ) that was fixed to a
monitoring platform that towed the swimmer. The platform
speed was set by a calibrated impeller flow meter (Model
HP301A2M, Mead Instruments, Riverdale, NJ). The veloc-
ities started at 0.2 m·s
1
and were increased in 0.2 m·s
1
increments up to 2.2 m·s
1
(0.03 m·s
1
, over the entire
speed range).
Swimmers breathed through a swimmers snorkel (Finis
Inc., Tracy, CA) and force (total drag; D) was measured
using the vertically mounted dynamometer, the output of
which was conditioned using a Linear Variable Differential
Transformer (Model 300D, Daytronics, Dayton, OH). The
output of the LVDT was processed using an A/D Converter
(Model PPIO-AI08, ComputerBoards, Mansfield, MA) via
software developed in houseto average and store velocity
and force every min using a personal computer (Model 770,
IBM Thinkpad, Armonk, NY). The data were then plotted as
a function of velocity. All devices were calibrated before
and after each experiment.
During the passive towing experiments, the swimmers
(and a calibration frame) were videotaped through an un-
derwater window using a video camera (DCR TRV 840,
Sony, Oradell, NJ). A simple vertical and horizontal linear
scale was used as a camera calibration frame. After each
swim, the video was replayed and the frontal area, A
f
(
), of
the swimmer was calculated from the whole body angle,
,
from the horizontal (averaged over the body length) using
the following equation:
Af
Af0cos
AS/2sin
[1]
where A
f0
is the frontal area when the swimmer is horizontal
(
0) and A
s
is the body surface area. The measured angle
represents a time average and was assumed to not vary with
suit design.
Measured Glide Drag
For the starts and push-offs experiments, the coefficient
of drag was determined in a competitive swimming pool
after a push-off from the wall or after a dive from the
starting blocks using a device called a swim-meterdevel-
oped by Craig and Pendergast (3). The swim-meter mea-
sured the decrease in instantaneous velocity as the subject
decelerated passively from the maximal initial velocity. The
swim-meter consisted of a wire secured to the swimmer that
passed through a system of pulleys and turned a DC gen-
erator (3) as the wire was pulled from a fishing reel. The
output of the DC generator was recorded using a computer
and the drag coefficient (C
D
) was calculated using a method
based on a linear mass-damper system. As such, the drag
force is assumed to be the sum of a linear and quadratic
function of the velocity. The constants of proportionality are
determined from the results of a regression of the measured
transient velocity data. Additional details are given in the
thesis, Oppenheim, E. Model parameter and drag coefficient
estimation from swimmer velocity measurements (M.S.
Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University
at Buffalo, 1997).
Theoretical Calculations
Data analysis. For surface swimming, the most rele-
vant kinds of drag are skin-friction drag, pressure drag and
wave and spray drag. A passively towed swimmers surface
can be approximated by an arrangement of a sphere and
circular cylinders in axial flow. Because the boundary layers
are typically thin compared with the radii, the flows can be
modeled to a good approximation as flows over flat plates
(2,6,8).
The Reynolds number, Re
L
, based on a characteristic length,
L, is defined as, Re
L
VL/
, where V is the swimming speed
and
is the fluid kinematic viscosity. For high Reynolds
numbers, as observed in competitive swimming, the flow ex-
periences transition-to-turbulence, separates from the surface,
and the pressure drag is caused by viscosity.
For flow over a flat plate at zero angle-of-attack, transi-
tion-to-turbulence begins at about Re
L
510
5
and ends
at about Re
L
10
7
(7). For a swimmer 170 cm tall, the
Reynolds numbers based on swimmer length (height) cor-
responding to V 0.3 m·s
1
and 2.2 m·s
1
are 5.10 10
5
1030
Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine http://www.acsm-msse.org
and 3.74 10
6
, respectively. Consequently, the flow over
the length of the swimmers body is neither completely
laminar nor completely turbulent, it is transitional and ill-
defined. For example, in a completely stillambient, free-
stream turbulence will be absent and transitional flows can
persist as laminar beyond about, Re
cr
510
5
.Onthe
other hand, in a noisyambient, both the beginning and end
of transition-to-turbulence will occur at lower Reynolds
numbers. That is to say, the flow is trippable(to
turbulence).
As a result, the forward portion of the swimmer, modeled
as a flat plate, will be in laminar flow, and most of the aft
portion of the swimmer will be in transitional flow. It is
important to note that in the present study the length of the
swimmer is defined as the swimmer height. Thus, for a
general scenario, laminar, transition and turbulent flow re-
gime limits can be described in terms of swimmer speed and
swimmer height. For example, it can be seen from Figure 1
that for a speed of 2 m·s
1
, the laminar flow ends at about
25 cm aft of the swimmers head and that most of the body
of the swimmer is in the near-laminar/transition-to-turbu-
lence region. For the towing procedure used in the present
study, the swimmers arms are outstretched as indicated on
Figure 2. It seems reasonable (as was assumed here) that the
outstretched arms are quite streamlined and they do not
significantly disturb the flow or contribute to drag. The
head, followed by the shoulders, represents the leading
edgeof the main part of the body. In this sense, the
outstretched arms can be thought of as an extension of the
towing cable. The actual extent of the laminar flow region
depends upon both swimming speed and the transition-to-
turbulence Reynolds number. The latter is determined as
one of the fit parameters in our regression of the data
reported herein.
The skin-friction drag of the swimmer, D
SF
, was calcu-
lated as for a flat plate in the transition-to-turbulence region
(7) as:
DSF qA
S0.074/ReL1/5 1740/ReL[2]
where q is the dynamic pressure, q 1/2
V
2
,
is the fluid
density, and A
S
is the surface area. The corresponding
pressure drag (D
P
) was calculated using the results of
Schmitt (12). As a starting point in the data regression, the
skin friction drag was calculated using one half (1/2) of the
body surface area, because it is assumed that the swimmer
would be partially out of the water. The actual body surface
area is not needed, however, because it is buriedin the
regression coefficient. This can be seen in the equation for
D
SF
on Figure 2. The D
P
was formulated to be proportional
to the second power of the velocity and directly proportional
to the frontal surface area, which is a measured function of
the body angle variation with speed. The D
W
was formu-
lated to be proportional to the fourth power of the velocity.
Thus, the experimental data were used as the basis for the
theoretical calculations. Drag decomposition consisted of
summing the drag components and then determining the
proportionality constants as well as the transition Reynolds
number using a standard multiple, nonlinear regression
package (NonlinearFit, Mathematica, Wolfram Research).
Statistical Analysis
Mean and SD were calculated for all data to describe and
present the individual values in the figures and tables. The
data for the different suits were compared using an ANOVA
for repeated measures for suits and speeds. Data were also
fit, using regression analysis, with the best statistical fit
being reported. The 0.05 level of significance was accepted
for all comparisons.
RESULTS
Complete drag and drag coefficient data were obtained on
the seven swimmers in the five suits. The suit weights in air
ranged from 0.32 to 0.34 kg, and the densities ranged from
1.0536 to 1.0883 both wet and dry. All of the suits tested had
a density greater than water, and there were no significant
differences among the suits tested.
Measured towing drag. The test-retest reliability of
the passive drag measurement (Fig. 2) was 0.94 (N77).
The regression analysis allowed the value of the critical
Reynolds number to floatand be a parameter to be de-
termined by the behavior of the data. As such, it was found
that transition-to-turbulence occurred at a Re of about 3
10
3
(lowest curve, lower left corner of Fig. 2, left panel). It
can be seen that the transition from laminar flow occurs very
early (a few centimeters), i.e., near the maximal diameter of
the head, and was not significantly different among the suits
tested (Fig. 2, left panel). Therefore, most of the length of
FIGURE 1—Speed is plotted as a function of the height a hypothetical
average swimmer if transition-to-turbulence began at a Re of 5 10
5
and ended at 1 10
7
. The region between the laminar flow and
turbulent flow regions is the transition-to-turbulence region (25 cm
and beyond, for a swimming speed of 2.2 m·s
1
). For this hypothetical
plot, the laminar region is less than 25 cm from the top of the head for
a swimming speed of 2.2 m·s
1
. The more turbulent region is from the
knee to the foot, with the region between the head and knee in the early
transition region. The data reported herein suggest that transition-to-
turbulence begins at a Reynolds number considerably less than 5 10
5
.
EFFECT OF SWIM SUIT DESIGN ON PASSIVE DRAG Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
1031
the body, between the head and feet, is in the transition
phase.
The total drag increased monotonically: 77.5 3.7, 81.7
3.9, 82.3 4.8, 83.5 4.9, and 86.2 4.3 N at a V of
2.2 m·s
1
, for the SK, SA, WA, WK and CS, respectively
(Fig. 2, right panel). From these data, it can be concluded
that the more surface area of the torso that is covered with
the Fastskin suit material the less the total drag was and
ranged from 3% for WK to 10% for SK.
Measured glide drag. As described in the method
section, the C
D
was calculated from both dives and push-
offs (Table 1). The test-retest reliability of the C
D
was 0.978
(N35).
The peak velocities achieved were not significantly dif-
ferent among the suits for the starts or turns and were 5.829
0.128 m·s
1
for the starts and 2.68 0.07 m·s
1
for the
push-offs. The C
D
for SA, SK, WA, and WK were not
statistically different from each other, but all were signifi-
cantly different from CS (15, 8, 8, and 10%, respectively).
Theoretical calculations. Decomposing the total drag
yielded expressions for D
SF
,D
P
, and D
W
(Fig. 2, right
panel). D
SF
increased as function of V and was significantly
FIGURE 2Data for total drag and
drag decomposed into drag due to skin
frictional (D
SF
), drag due to pressure
(D
P
) and drag due to wave (D
W
) are
shown as a function of velocity in the
right panels for the five tested suits in
order (from top to bottom) of decreas-
ing total drag. The left panels show the
suit coverage areas as well as swim-
ming speed plotted as a function of the
swimmers height. The shaded area in-
dicates the speeds observed in compet-
itive swimming. All values are the av-
erages of the seven subjects tested. The
three curves in the lower left corner of
the left panel are for transition Reyn-
olds numbers: 3 10
3
,310
4
, and 3
10
5
. The other two curves are the
same as those in Figure 1; namely, 5
10
5
and 1 10
7
. The left panel shows
that the laminar flow region persists
within only the first few centimeters of
the head for the transition Reynolds
numbers shown, whereas the region
between the head and knee has transi-
tional flow. The data for the D
SF
,D
P
,
and D
W
are shown for each suit in the
right panel along with the equations
that describe the data. The D
SF
was
significantly greater for the SA and SK
suits than the WA, WK, and competi-
tion suit, whereas the D
P
and D
W
were
significantly lower, as was the total D.
There was not a statistically significant
difference between the SA and SK
suits.
1032
Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine http://www.acsm-msse.org
greater in the SA and SK suits (42.8 and 45.6 N, respec-
tively, at V 2.2 m·s
1
) than the WA, WK, and CS (20.0,
23.3, and 18.5 N, respectively, at V 2.2 m·s
1
), which
were not significantly different from each other. D
P
in-
creased as a function of V
2
and was significantly lower in
SA and SK (28.3 and 28.9 N, respectively, at V 2.2
m·s
1
) than in WA, WK, and CS (42.4, 41.9, and 44.9 N,
respectively, at V 2.2 m·s
1
), which were not signifi-
cantly different from each other. D
W
increased as a function
of V
4
, and the SA and SK suits values were significantly
lower (10.6 and 3.0 N, respectively, at V 2.2 m·s
1
), than
the WA, WK, and CS (19.9, 18.3, 22.8 N, respectively, at V
2.2 m·s
1
), which were not significantly different from
each other. In summary the higher D
SF
in the SA and SK
suits resulted in a reduction in both the D
P
and D
W
, which
was not observed for the WA or WK suits. Covering the
torso increased the D
SF
, which presumably reduced the D
P
and D
W
by tripping the boundary layer and attaching flow to
the remainder of the body. The absence of significant dif-
ferences between SA and SK (one comparison), and WA
and WK (another comparison) for D
SF
,D
P
, and D
W
may
reside in the observation that flow below the knee is be-
coming turbulent (Fig. 2, left panel) and thus covering this
area does not alter drag. It is tentatively concluded that the
lower D
W
for SK may be due to the absence of coverage
from the knee to the ankle. This effect is apparently coun-
teracted by the increase in D
P
for WA, WK, and CS due to
the absence of coverage from the shoulder to the waist.
Accordingly, coverage from the shoulder to the waist trips
the boundary layer and promotes attached flow, hence low-
ering D
P
.
DISCUSSION
Swimming performance is determined, in part, by the body
drag of the swimmer, which has components of friction, pres-
sure, and wave. The relative importance of these three sources
of drag is velocity dependent; thus, to understand the contri-
bution of these sources of drag in competitive swimming,
velocities of 1.52.2 m·s
1
must be evaluated.
Previous studies have shown that the energy requirement
of swimming at all speeds is determined, in part, by the indi-
vidual swimmers body density and torque (1,9,10,18,19).
Although these factors are set by the stature of the swimmer,
decreasing his density could lower drag and/or energy require-
ment (11,18,19). This has been shown for a wet suit (15). The
five suits tested in this study had densities slightly greater than
water, and thus would not significantly alter body density. In
this study, the swimmers squeezed-out any air that might have
been trapped between their body and the suit using their hands.
This was done because trapped air could affect body density
during competition (11).
Theoretically, based upon basic fluid mechanics, the way
to reduce the drag of a swimmer at the surface is to: 1)
reduce the wetted surface area, 2) promote laminar flow
over the surface, 3) promote attached flow, and 4) minimize
the production of waves and spray. One potential method to
accomplish drag reduction is to wear drag-reducing suits.
These suits have been purported to reduce skin friction
(11,17), although it should be cautioned that these refer-
ences are nonrefereed swim magazines. However, the re-
sults of a scientific study (16) also suggest a reduction in
drag, although the reduction was not statistically significant.
It should be noted that laminar flow and attached flow are
distinctly independent concepts arising from basic fluid
mechanics. Further, attached turbulent flow typically has
higher skin friction drag but lower pressure drag than de-
tached (separated) laminar flow. It is this trade-off between
the skin friction, pressure and wave drag that suggested the
need for the presently reported study.
It is commonly held that drag-reducing suits reduce D
SF
(1015%) (17); however, D
SF
is low in swimming
(11,17,20). Consequently, an alteration in D
SF
was previ-
ously believed to hold little promise for drag reduction.
Furthermore, before the presently reported study, the quan-
titative details of the trade-offs between the various kinds of
drag were unknown. A comparison with previously reported
drag breakdown indicates that the pressure drag, D
P
93.5
N (20), is about 23 times greater than that reported here.
The skin friction drag, D
SF
0.05 N (20), is approximately
400900 times smaller than that reported here. The wave
drag, D
W
5 N (20), is about four times smaller than that
reported here. It appears, however, that (20) used the New-
tonian definition of viscosity and the relationship between
surface shear and time-rate-of-change of strain for a New-
tonian fluid for friction resistance. As such, dV/dZ is meant
to represent the slope of the velocity profile at the surface,
not a finite difference approximation to the average slope.
Using the average slope (20) will result in a very significant
underestimate of friction resistance because the velocity
distribution (and hence its slope) is increasing rapidly near
the surface to accommodate the no-slip boundary condition
at the surface. Further, no basis is given for the ranges of
input parameters and one input parameter value used was
not in the range given. Finally, it appears that there are
errors in units and in the numerically computed values. Our
work does not rely on guessing from a range of parameters
but, rather, uses appropriate theoretical formulations and
lets the data (based on measurements) determine the relative
coefficients based on the best fit in a least squares sense. In
the present study, D
SF
was not reduced by the suits tested;
in fact, D
SF
was higher in the SA and SK suits than the WA,
WK, or CS. The density of the swimmer was not affected by
the suits tested; thus, it is unlikely that the wetted surface
area of the swimmer is reduced. The laminar flow region of
the swimmers among all suits tested were not significantly
different (Fig. 1, left column), and transition-to-turbulence
TABLE 1. The mean and SD values for the coefficient of drag, C
D
(drag force)/(
1
2
V
2
A
S
), determined from the deceleration during a dive and push-off for the five
suits tested.
Suit SA SK WA WK CS
Mean 0.832* 0.897* 0.896* 0.880* 0.978
SD 0.043 0.079 0.081 0.063 0.074
* Significant difference from the competition suit (CS).
EFFECT OF SWIM SUIT DESIGN ON PASSIVE DRAG Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
1033
occurred at the head, before the areas of the body covered by
any of the suits.
There was significant drag reduction (1015%) when the
swimmers wore the SA or SK suits compared with the other
suits (Fig. 2, right panel). There was not a statistically signif-
icant difference between the SA and SK suits. The reduction in
total drag occurred, in spite of the observation that D
SF
in-
creased by twofold, due to the reduction in D
P
(37%) and D
W
(6080%). These data support the conclusion that the in-
creased D
SF
tripped the boundary layer and that the flow
remained attached to the body past the shoulders, in the tran-
sitional phase, and thus lowered both D
P
and D
W
.
The absence of significant drag reduction with drag-
reducing suits that start their coverage at the waist implies
that these suits did not lower D
SF
or trip the boundary layer,
or if they did, the effects were not significant. This finding
is interesting because the lower body coverage suits are the
most commonly ordered mens suits. It is noted that the
measured glide data in Table 1 indicates that the leg-only
body suits (WK and WA) showed a significant reduction in
drag compared with the conventional suit (CS). Further from
Table 1, the SA and SK suits were not significantly different
from each other. On the other hand, using the measured towing
data the SA and SK suits were significantly different from the
WA, WK, and CS suits. We believe that the accuracy of the
measured towing data is better than the accuracy of the mea-
sured glide data because the towing data were taken over a
much longer time period (more than 5 min per speed) whereas
the measured glide data relied on a data fit over a short time (a
few seconds per glide).
The data from this study also demonstrate that the cov-
erage of the leg below the knee is not essential to the drag
reduction of the suits (SK and WK were as effective as SA
and WA). The calf may be in the region of turbulent flow
and thus the boundary layer can not be tripped or this area
is too small to have an effect. Table 1 shows that the SA,
SK, WA, and WK suits exhibited significant difference
from the CS suit (only), not between the SA, SK, WA, and
WK suits. As stated earlier, a more accurate discriminator is
the measured towing data, for the reasons given above.
It should be noted that the observation that the laminar
flow is disrupted at the head suggests that tripping the
boundary layer at the head gives the greatest reduction in
drag. It should also be considered that tripping the boundary
layer at multiple locations may be required as flow separa-
tion may occur at all parts of the body were there are marked
changes in curvature (head, shoulders, buttocks).
An alternative method to reduce drag would be to place
protuberances (vortex generators) at strategic places on the
swimmer. Some models of these suits with protuberances
have been developed and tested and have been shown to
reduce drag, with 2.5-mm protuberances being recom-
mended (11,17). A prototype suit with 10-mm protuber-
ances at the buttocks was tested on six swimmers and was
not found to reduce drag (C
D
of 0.846 0.119) when
compared with a similar suit without protuberances (C
D
0.869 0.203); however, both suits were lower than a
competition suit (0.902 0.115). Additional details are
given in the thesis, Oppenheim, E. Model parameter and
drag coefficient estimation from swimmer velocity measure-
ments (M.S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University at Buffalo, 1997). The Fastskin suits used in the
present study have microscopic vortex generators and riblets to
channel water flow and have been purported to reduce total
drag by 7.5% (11); however, this claim has been questioned
(11), and the D
SF
in the present study was either not changed
(WA, WK) or increased (SA, SK). The absence of effective-
ness of the protuberances tested to date may be due to their
placement or size, as the thickness of the boundary layer and its
location are not known.
Based on the data from this study, the SA and SK drag-
reducing suits reduce drag significantly, and the effect is
large enough to have an effect on competitive swimming
performance. The suits did not compromise the maximal
velocity of the dive or turn. The drag while actually swim-
ming (active drag) is significantly greater than passive drag,
due to the changes in body position and density and move-
ment of arms and legs changing the direction of flow over
the vortex generators and riblets (4,5,10,11,15). Previous
studies have suggested that there is no reduction in active
drag when wearing drag reduction suits (16). These authors
report, however, that some swimmers did have a reduction
in active drag (21.66 v
2.23
) compared with a competition suit
(23.32 v
2.29
) which represents an 11% reduction at 1.65
m·s
1
. It is unclear what the differences in the subjects that
had a reduction in drag and those that did not were, if any.
The system used to determine drag in these studies requires
the swimmer to use only arms, with the legs floated which
alters active drag and perhaps the effects of the suits.
It has been shown that shaving body hair reduces the
energy cost of swimming, presumably due to reduced D
SF
,
(13) and in this case the suits may not provide any additional
benefit (11). The present study used unshaven swimmers;
however, the C
D
of shaved swimmers determined by the
methods used in this study reduced the C
D
of the same
shaved swimmers from 0.58 to 0.53 (9%), which is less than
the effects of the suits (15%) and previously shown by the
same group for a torso suit (14). Additional details are given
in the thesis, Oppenheim, E. Model parameter and drag
coefficient estimation from swimmer velocity measure-
ments (M.S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineer-
ing, University at Buffalo, 1997).
It is clear that loose fitting competition or drag-reducing
suits can increase drag when compared with tight-fitting
suits (16; 17). We compared a competition suit with a
training suit, using the system described above, and found a
C
D
of 1.04 and 1.29, respectively. The data clearly suggests
that both types of suits should be tight fitting.
In summary, the total passive drag determined in the
presently reported study was significantly reduced by
Fastskin suits that covered the swimmer from the shoulder
to either the ankle or knee compared with models that
covered only the lower body or a conventional suit. The data
demonstrate that laminar flow undergoes transition-to-tur-
bulence in the first few centimeters of the body (head) and
that the flow is transitional over the rest of the body. Con-
1034
Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine http://www.acsm-msse.org
trary to common beliefs, the D
SF
is increased by these suits,
and the data are consistent with the concept that the in-
creased friction on the shoulders caused by the suit, trips the
boundary layer, causing attachment of flow to the body, and
results in reduced pressure, wave and total drag. It seems
that at least in some swimmers, the active drag is also
reduced (16). Based on these data, suits that cover from the
shoulder reduce drag and may improve performance, but
only for velocities above 1.5 m·s
1
. Below 1.5 m·s
1
,no
differences were observed. Changing the characteristic of
flow around the head of a swimmer and effective use of
protuberances in strategic locations on the body needs fur-
ther study as does the implications for these passive drag
studies on active drag and performance. Nevertheless, de-
composing total drag, into D
SF
,D
P
and D
W
is believed to be
helpful in understanding the physical mechanisms that de-
termine drag.
We thank Adolph Kiefer and Associates for their data on swim-
ming suit use and the University at Buffalo Swimming and Diving
Team for their participation. We acknowledge the technical assis-
tance of Dean Marky, Frank Modlich, Eric Stimson, and Michael
Fletcher.
The authors gratefully acknowledge support for this research
from the United States Navy, NAVSEA, Navy Experimental Diving
Unit, contract N6133199C0028.
No funding or support was given by the swimming suit manufac-
turer or supplier.
REFERENCES
1. CHATARD, J. C., J. M. LAVOIE,B.BOURGOIN, and J. R. LACOUR. The
contribution of passive drag as a determinant of swimming per-
formance. Int. J. Sports Med. 11:367372, 1990.
2. COOPER, R. D., and M. P. TULIN. The laminar flow about very
slender cylinders in axial motion, including the effect of pressure
gradients and unsteady motions. David Taylor Model Basin Report
838:135, 1953.
3. CRAIG, A. B., JR., and D. R. PENDERGAST. Relationships of stroke
rate, distance per stroke, and velocity in competitive swimming.
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 11:278283, 1979.
4. DIPRAMPERO, P. E., D. R. PENDERGAST,D.R.WILSON, and D. W.
RENNIE. Body drag and efficiency in swimming. Arch. Fisiol.
69(Suppl.):502515, 1972.
5. DIPRAMPERO, P. E., D. R. PENDERGAST,D.R.WILSON, and D. W.
RENNIE. Energetics of swimming in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 37:15,
1974.
6. ECKERT, H. U. Simplified treatment of the turbulent boundary layer along
a cylinder in compressible flow. J. Aeron. Sci. 19:2328, 1952.
7. FOX, R. W., and A. T. MCDONALD.Introduction to Fluid Mechan-
ics, 4th Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992, p. 440.
8. LANDWEBER, L. The axially symmetric potential flow about elon-
gated bodies of revolution. David Taylor Model Basin Report
761:165, 1949.
9. MCLEAN, S. P., and R. N. HINRICHS. Sex differences in the center
of buoyancy location of competitive swimmers. J. Sport Sci.
16:373383, 1998.
10. PENDERGAST, D. R., P. E. DIPRAMPERO,A.B.CRAIG,JR., D. R.
WILSON, and D. W. RENNIE. Quantitative analysis of the front crawl
in men and women. J. Appl. Physiol. Respirat. Environ. Exerc.
Physiol. 43:475479, 1977.
11. SANDERS, R., B. RUSHALL,H.TOUSSAINT,J.STAGER, and H. TAKAGI.
Bodysuit yourself, but first think about it. Am. Swimming Maga-
zine 5:2332, 2001.
12. SCHMITT, T. J. Wind-tunnel investigation of air loads on human
beings. David Taylor Model Basin Report 892:165, 1954.
13. SHARP, R. L., and D. L. COSTILL. Influence of body hair removal on
physiological responses during breaststroke swimming. Med. Sci.
Sports Exerc. 21:57680, 1998.
14. STARLING, R. D., D. L. COSTILL,T.A.TRAPPE,A.C.JOZSI,S.W.
TRAPPE, and B. H. GOODPLASTER. Effect of swimming suit design
on the energy demands of swimming. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
27:10861089, 1995.
15. TOUSSAINT, H. M., D. DE GROOT,H.H.C.M.SAVELBERG,K.
VERVOORN,A.P.HOLLANDER, and G. J. VAN INGEN SCHENAU. Effect
of a triathlon wet suit on drag during swimming. Med. Sci. Sports
Exerc. 21:325328, 1989.
16. TOUSSAINT, H. M., M. TRUIJENS,M.J.ELZINGA, et al. Effect of a
Fast-skin bodysuit on drag during front crawl swimming. Sport
Biomech. 1:110, 2002.
17. WALSH, J. Suits slicker than skin. Swim Magazine July:14, 1998.
18. ZAMPARO, P., G. ANTONUTTO,C.CAPELLI, et al. Effects of body size,
body density, gender and growth on underwater torque. Scand.
J. Med. Sci. Sports 6:273280, 1996.
19. ZAMPARO, P., C. CAPELLI,B.TERMIN,D.R.PENDERGAST, and P. E.
DIPRAMPERO. Effect of the underwater torque on the energy cost,
drag and efficiency of front crawl swimming. Eur. J. Appl.
Physiol. 73:195201, 1996.
20. ZATSIORSKY, M. (Ed.). Biomechanics in Sport: Performance Im-
provement and Injury Prevention. Boston: Blackwell Science,
2000, pp. 184231.
EFFECT OF SWIM SUIT DESIGN ON PASSIVE DRAG Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
1035
... Conventional methods for calculating PFA include using predictive models based on anthropometric features (13)(14)(15) and manually tracing a series of perspective frontal snapshots of swimmers (8,9). The former method provides rough estimates based on body parameters and trunk angle, thus lacking sufficient information to accurately estimate the PFA of each body segment of a swimmer. ...
... First, it is possible to obtain the PFA of each body segment rather than that of the whole body. In previous studies, PFA was calculated using an equation derived from anthropometric features (13)(14)(15), and by manually tracing a sequence of perspective frontal images obtained using an underwater video camera (8,9). Although these methods have the advantage of simplicity and ease of use in practical cases, they also have several limitations. ...
... Although these methods have the advantage of simplicity and ease of use in practical cases, they also have several limitations. The former method (13)(14)(15) shows that it is impossible to obtain the PFA of each body segment because the equation roughly predicts the PFA using the trunk inclination angle as a dynamic variable. The latter method includes interand intraoperator errors due to the manual operation (8,9). ...
Article
Purpose This study aimed to provide evidence for the interpretation of the projected frontal area (PFA) during front crawl. To achieve this goal, we developed a method for calculating the PFA of each body segment using digital human technology and compared the pressure drag under two calculation conditions: a combination of the PFA with and without accounting for the horizontal velocity of each body segment. Methods Twelve competitive male swimmers performed a 15-meter front crawl at 1.20 m·s ⁻¹ . The three-dimensional positions of the reflective markers attached to the swimmer’s body were recorded using an underwater motion-capture system. Based on the body shape of each swimmer obtained from the photogenic body scanner, individual digital human body models were created with the color of the model’s vertices divided into eight body segments. The time series of the volumetric swimming motion was reconstructed using inverse kinematics. The PFA of each body segment was then calculated by the automatic processing of a series of parallel frontal images. The pressure drag index, defined as the value excluding the drag coefficient while simultaneously considering the PFA and the horizontal velocity, was calculated under two conditions: the static condition (accounting for only the PFA of each body segment) and the dynamic condition (accounting for the PFA and horizontal velocity of each body segment). Results Notably, the pressure drag index was higher under the static condition than under the dynamic condition for the humerus, ulna, and hand segments ( p < 0.001). Conclusions The results obtained using our methodology indicate that the PFA of the upper limb segments overestimates their contribution to pressure drag during front crawl under the static condition.
... A typical testing protocol involves a swimmer submerging and pushing off the wall in a streamlined position, causing an acceleration, followed by a deceleration due to the resistive forces of the water acting on the streamlined body. Resistive forces can be estimated by finding the instantaneous deceleration via cable accelerometers, underwater video analysis, and body mass of the swimmer [14,15]. An extra water mass is moved together, with the swimmer and their body mass, which must be considered as part of the inertia. ...
... This is difficult to calculate due to the dependence on several factors such as area of impact and hydrodynamic coefficient. It is common in literature for this added mass to be ignored [15]. This method of determining passive drag is cheap, with results comparable to flume and towing methods, although drag values tend to be consistently higher in past studies [7]. ...
Article
Discussed is a comparison of computational and experimental evaluations of passive drag during human swimming. Experimentally, ten trials were conducted per athlete at five chosen velocities, using a commercial resistance trainer to record the tension force in a rope during a streamline position tow test. The resistive force recorded was assumed equal to the passive drag force and an average value of passive drag was found across each tow test. Mean passive drag values measured during the tow test were agreed well with existing experimental data across the range of velocities used, varying between 20 N at 1 ms−1 up to 100 N at 2 ms−1. Computationally, using the immersed boundary method in OpenFOAM, basic geometry validation cases and streamline passive drag cases were simulated. Validation cases were completed on 2D cylinders and 3D spheres with the drag coefficient found at low and high Reynolds numbers, using the simpleFoam solver within OpenFOAM. Results tended to be slightly over predictive when compared with existing simulation and experimental data in literature. The accuracy of results could potentially be improved using a finer mesh and better quality geometries. The passive drag was also computed using OpenFOAM over a range of velocities, similar to the experiments, varying from 30 N at 1 ms−1 to 120 N at 2 ms−1. Drag forces computed using simpleFoam were over predictive when compared to existing literature and the completed experiments, likely due to the inaccuracy of the geometry used in the simulations. When results were compared to existing literature for swimmers not in a perfect streamline position, more similar to the geometry used in this study, results were in better agreement. The accuracy of the results could be improved using a better quality geometry in the correct position.
... As more and more world records were broken at the Olympic swimming competitions, research on the drag reduction performance of swimsuits and their mechanism emerged in the academic field. 1,[4][5][6][7][8][9] While debates on "whether high-speed swimsuits should be used in competitions" continued, FINA released new regulations to restrict racing swimsuit design in aspects such as material composition, thickness, permeability, and buoyancy. 10 To comply with FINA regulations, adjustments were made to the speed improvement methods for the new generation of high-speed swimsuits. ...
... Mollendorf et al. conducted tests on the Fastskin swimsuits with a wider range of body coverage. 6 Besides the towing method adopted to measure the drag at a constant velocity, a "swim meter" was used for measurement at decelerating velocity after a push-off or dive into the water. A reduction in total drag ranging from 3% for waist-to-knee Fastskin suits to 10% for shoulder-to-knee Fastskin suits was observed, which indicated the benefit of higher body coverage. ...
Article
Full-text available
Swimsuits represent an interdisciplinary research field of textiles and clothing, materials, bionics, fluid mechanics, and other disciplines. The aesthetic style, comfort design, speed performance, and additional functions of swimsuits have been studied extensively. However, due to the diversity of research topics, swimsuit-related research is scattered in various research branches. An overview of research progress and frontiers in this whole field is hard to find. Given that a comprehensive application of technologies is required to meet consumers' increasing demands for more functional and professional sports products, it is necessary to have knowledge of the latest progress in each research area. This study covers the aesthetics, comfort, speed enhancement, and other additional functions of swimsuits, summarizes the research progress in each relevant area, and predicts potential hotspots based on analysis. It is predicted that smart textiles and technologies will be applied more widely to swimsuits for real-time monitoring and instruction, intelligent drag reduction, energy harvesting, etc. With the upgrade of each function, efforts will be needed to maintain the delicate balance between the multiple functions integrated into swimsuits, and a more refined classification will be required to meet the specialized demands of swimmers.
... For swimming, small changes to shoulder entry angle (180°considered optimal) can increase form and wave drag, thus decreasing swim performance (1). Even minor reductions in resistive drag can yield significant improvements in swim velocity (1,28). Lateral deviations (hip sway) also contribute to resistive drag force, with greater lateral deviations increasing hip sway and reducing performance (1,9,13). ...
Article
Recirculating swimming flumes (RSFs) with elliptical multifeature designs have grown in popularity due to their multifunctionality for rehabilitation and training. Because of their smaller footprint, laboratories have adopted their use to investigate swimming and underwater treadmill running. However, little is known about the hydrodynamic characteristics of these RSFs and how they might influence outcomes. The purpose was to determine hydrodynamic flow characteristics of an RSF at the manufacturers' set "speeds" around the centroid of flow projection. Hydrodynamic velocity profiles were collected through a 3D profiling velocimeter, sampling at 200 Hz in an RSF. Data were collected 0.5 and 1.5 m from the projection channel at designated flume "speeds" of 30-95 (+99) in 5-unit increments. Velocity data were collected for 1 minute per trial (location × speed) to determine mean flow velocity (MFV) for 10, 20, 30, and 40 cm2 cross-sectional areas (CSAs). A two-way ANOVA was conducted comparing CSAs from the surface by distance from the current channel (4 × 2). Separate ANOVAs were conducted to assess differences in MFV across each CSA. Significant differences between flow CSAs indicated that MFV is less for a larger area at the same speed, indicative of variable and turbulent flow characteristics across the respective CSAs. Mean flow velocity was further diminished by distance from the flow channel as supported by the main effect, thus exposing an individual to variant flow velocities simultaneously. Limited stability of the flow velocity centroid could affect swim mechanics making the movement pattern no longer analogous to traditional pool and open water swimming, rather resembling swimming upstream in a river with turbulent flow.
Article
Water covers over 70% of the earth, has varying depths and temperatures and contains much of the earth's resources. Head‐out water immersion (HOWI) or submersion at various depths (diving) in water of thermoneutral (TN) temperature elicits profound cardiorespiratory, endocrine, and renal responses. The translocation of blood into the thorax and elevation of plasma volume by autotransfusion of fluid from cells to the vascular compartment lead to increased cardiac stroke volume and output and there is a hyperperfusion of some tissues. Pulmonary artery and capillary hydrostatic pressures increase causing a decline in vital capacity with the potential for pulmonary edema. Atrial stretch and increased arterial pressure cause reflex autonomic responses which result in endocrine changes that return plasma volume and arterial pressure to preimmersion levels. Plasma volume is regulated via a reflex diuresis and natriuresis. Hydrostatic pressure also leads to elastic loading of the chest, increasing work of breathing, energy cost, and thus blood flow to respiratory muscles. Decreases in water temperature in HOWI do not affect the cardiac output compared to TN; however, they influence heart rate and the distribution of muscle and fat blood flow. The reduced muscle blood flow results in a reduced maximal oxygen consumption. The properties of water determine the mechanical load and the physiological responses during exercise in water (e.g. swimming and water based activities). Increased hydrostatic pressure caused by submersion does not affect stroke volume; however, progressive bradycardia decreases cardiac output. During submersion, compressed gas must be breathed which introduces the potential for oxygen toxicity, narcosis due to nitrogen, and tissue and vascular gas bubbles during decompression and after may cause pain in joints and the nervous system. © 2015 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 5:1705‐1750, 2015.
Article
Examining how diving equipment affects a diver's resistance when they are at free surface is the primary goal of this study. The other goal is to compute a diver's resistance with equipment and in different positions. The methodology used in this study is computational fluid dynamics. The Star-CCM + application uses the SST K–ω turbulent model to simulate the flow around an adult human's three-dimensional bare hull during swimming. There are four possible dive positions that are taken into consideration: horizontal diving, diving at an angle of attack of 30°, diving at an angle of 45°, and diving at an angle of 45° while bending the knees 45° backward. The outcomes of horizontal diving are contrasted with the unequipped, bare hull of an adult human. The simulations take into account the flow velocities between 0.5 and 2 m/s with an increasing step of 0.5 m/s. The findings indicate that the use of diving equipment increases total resistance by 90–128% when swimming close to the surface and by 28–62% when swimming at higher velocities on the surface. The findings of this study have applications in the design of water scooters, swimming thrusters, and propulsion vehicles.
Article
Full-text available
Gliding is a crucial phase in swimming, yet the understanding of fluid force and flow fields during gliding remains incomplete. This study analyzes gliding through Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations. Specifically, a numerical model based on the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method for flow-object interactions is established. Fluid motion is governed by continuity, Navier-Stokes, state, and displacement equations. Modified dynamic boundary particles are used to implement solid boundaries, and steady and uniform flows are generated with inflow and outflow conditions. The reliability of the SPH model is validated by replicating a documented laboratory experiment on a circular cylinder advancing steadily beneath a free surface. Reasonable agreement is observed between the numerical and experimental drag force and lift force. After the validation, the SPH model is employed to analyze the passive drag, vertical force, and pitching moment acting on a streamlined gliding 2D swimmer model as well as the surrounding velocity and vorticity fields, spanning gliding velocities from 1 m/s to 2.5 m/s, submergence depths from 0.2 m to 1 m, and attack angles from −10° to 10°. The results indicate that with the increasing gliding velocity, passive drag and pitching moment increase whereas vertical force decreases. The wake flow and free surface demonstrate signs of instability. Conversely, as the submergence depth increases, there is a decrease in passive drag and pitching moment, accompanied by an increase in vertical force. The undulation of the free surface and its interference in flow fields diminish. With the increase in the attack angle, passive drag and vertical force decrease whereas pitching moment increases, along with the alteration in wake direction and the increasing complexity of the free surface. These outcomes offer valuable insights into gliding dynamics, furnishing swimmers with a scientific basis for selecting appropriate submergence depth and attack angle.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the present study is calculation of the resistance and resistance coefficient of a diver on the water surface and near surface. The results of this article are useful for designing different types of water scooters. This study uses a computational fluid dynamics methodology by considering the effects of free surface. SST K-ω turbulent model is implemented in the Star-CCM+ application and is applied to the flow around a three-dimensional bare hull of an adult human. Three common swimming positions are considered: a ventral position with the arms extended at the front, a ventral position with the arms placed alongside the trunk and a ventral position with one arm extended at the front and another arm placed alongside the trunk. The flow velocities between 0.5 and 2.25m/s with increasing step of 0.25m/s are considered in the simulations which are typical speed of swimmers. According to the resistance coefficient vs Froude number diagrams, submerged diving with two hands alongside the trunk is produces lower resistance. Also, resistance in near surface swimming is lower than surface swimming in lowest speeds. But in higher speeds, that changes and resistance in surface swimming is lower than the other. The results of this research can be used for designing all types of marine propulsion vehicles, water scooter, and all swimming thrusters.
Article
Competitive swimmers were asked to swim at a constant velocity (V) for short distances. They wore a collar to which was attached a fine non-elastic steel wire. The wire passed over two wheels of a device attached to one end of the pool. One wheel generated an impulse for every cm of forward movement and another wheel produced an electrical signal which was directly proportional to V. Measurements of distance and time were begun at definable points in the stroke cycle and were discontinued at the end of a predetermined number of strokes. In all of the four competitive strokes, front and back crawl, butterfly, and breaststroke, the V increased as a result of increasing the stroke rate (Ṡ) and decreasing the distance per stroke (d/S). In the front crawl, the male and female swimmers who achieved the fastest V had the longest d/S at slow Ṡ. The faster male swimmers also had greater percent decrease of the d/S at their maximal V than did the less skilled persons. The back crawl was similar to the front crawl except that maximal Ṡ and V were less. Increases of V of the butterfly were related almost entirely to increases in Ṡ. Except at the higest V, d/S was decreased somewhat. In the breaststroke increased V was also associated with increasing Ṡ, but the d/S decreased much more than in the other stroke styles. Fluctuations of velocity during the stroke cycle were least in the front and back crawl (± 15-20%) and greatest in the butterfly and breaststroke (+45-50%). The results were compared to the Ṡ observed and the values for V and d/S calculated for a large group of swimmers competing in the 1976 U.S. Olympic Trials. The implications of the findings for coaching swimmers are discussed.
Article
An investigation was conducted in the Taylor Model Basin 8- by 10- foot subsonic, atmospheric Wind Tunnel 2 to determine the drag coefficient of man. Tests were made at several yaw angles with subjects of various sizes in five body positions: standing, sitting supine, and two squat positions. Data were obtained for the subjects in both the clothed and nude conditions. A parameter was formulated from the available physical characteristics of the subjects tested and all coefficients were based on this. Drag coefficients were obtained which should be reliable in predicting drag forces on men of average stature under a variety of conditions. Lift, side force, and moments were also obtained which indicate relative trends of motion for each position.
Article
An interation formula for Fredholm integral equations of the first kind is applied in two new methods for obtaining the steady, irrotational, axisymmetric flow of an inviscid, incompressible fluid about a body of revolution. In the first method a continuous, axial distribution of doublets is sought as a solution of an integral equation of the first kind. A method of determining the end points and the initial trends of the distribution, and a first approximation to a solution of the integral equation are given. This approximation is then used to obtain a sequence of successive approximations whose successive differences furnish a geometric measure of the accuracy of an approximation. When a doublet distribution has been assumed, the velocity and pressure can be computed by means of formulas which are also given. In the second method the velocity is given directly as the solution of an integral equation of the first kind. here also a first approximation is derived and applied to obtain a sequence of successive approximations. In contrast with the first method, which, in general, can give only an approximate solution, the integral equation of the second method has an exact solution. Both methods are illustrated in detail by an example. The results are compared with those obtained by other well-known methods.
Article
The effect on drag of a Speedo Fast‐skin suit compared to a conventional suit was studied in 13 subjects (6 males, 7 females) swimming at different velocities between 1.0 and 2.0 m•s‐1. The active drag force was directly measured during front crawl swimming using a system of underwater push‐off pads instrumented with a force transducer (MAD system). For a range of swimming speeds (1.1, 1.3, 1.5 and 1.7 m•s‐1), drag values were estimated. On a group level, a statistically non‐significant drag reduction effect of 2% was observed for the Fast‐skin suit (p = 0.31). Therefore, the 7.5% reduction in drag claimed by the swimwear manufacturer was not corroborated.
Article
Competitive swimmers were asked to swim at a constant velocity (v) for short distances. They wore a collar to which was attached a fine non-elastic steel wire. The wire passed over two wheels of a device attached to one end of the pool. One wheel generated an impulse for every cm of forward movement and another wheel produced an electrical signal which was directly proportional to V. Measurements of distance and time were begun at definable points in the stroke cycle and were discontinued at the end of a predetermined number of strokes. In all of the four competitive strokes, front and back crawl, butterfly, and breaststroke, the V increased as a result of increasing the stroke rate (S) and decreasing the distance per stroke (d/s). In the front crawl, the male and female swimmers who achieved the fastest V had the longest d/S at slow S. The faster male swimmers also had greater percent decrease of the d/S at their maximal V than did the less skilled persons. The back crawl was similar to the front crawl except that maximal S and V were less. Increases of V of the butterfly were related almost entirely to increases in S. Except at the highest V, d/S was decreased somewhat. In the breaststroke increased V was also associated with increasing S, but the d/S decreased much more than in the other stroke styles. Fluctuations of velocity during the stroke cycle were least in the front and back crawl (+/- 15--20%) and greatest in the butterfly and breaststroke (+ 45--50%). The results were compared to the S observed and the values for V and d/S calculated for a large group of swimmers competing in the 1976 U.S. Olympic Trials. The implications of the findings for coaching swimmers are discussed.
Article
Body drag, D, and the overall mechanical efficiency of swimming, e, were measured from the relationship between extra oxygen consumption and extra drag loads in 42 male and 22 female competitive swimmers using the front crawl at speeds ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 m/s. D increased from 3.4 (1.9) kg at 0.5 m/s to 8.2 (7.0) kg at 1.2 m/s, with D of women (in brackets) being significantly less (P less than 0.05) than that of men. Mechanical efficiency increased from 2.9% at 0.5 m/s to 7.4% at 1.2 m/s for men, the values for women being somewhat greater than those for men. The ratio, D/e was shown to be identical to the directly measured energy cost of swimming one unit distance, V02/d, and was independent of the velocity up to 1.2 m/s. It averaged 52 and 37 l/km for men and women respectively (P less than 0.05). When corrected for body surface area the values were 27 and 22 l/km-m2 for men and women, respectively (P less than 0.05). The underwater torque, T, a measure of the tendency of the feet to sink, was 1.44 kg-m for men and 0.70 kg-m for women (P less than 0.05). VO2/d increased linearly with T for both men and women of similar competitive experience. However, the proportionality constant delta VO2/d-delta T was significantly less for competitive than noncompetitive swimmers. The analysis of the relationship VO2/d vs. T provides a valuable approach to the understanding of the energetics of swimming.