Content uploaded by Sergio Stefanni
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sergio Stefanni on Jun 23, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Rev. Biol. Trop. 49 Supl. 1: 141-156, 2001
The Eastern Pacific species of B a t h y g o b i u s ( P e rciformes : Gobiidae)
Peter J. Miller & Sergio Stefanni
School of Biological Sciences, The University, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK. [fax +44 (0) 117 925 7374;
e-mail: Peter.Miller@bristol.ac.uk]
Abstract: The circumtropical gobiid genus Bathygobius Bleeker is defined and three Eastern Pacific species are
redescribed, with first dorsal fin pattern and postorbital blotches being shown to be additional characters of diagnostic
value. Two mainland species are recognised, the Mexican-Panamanian B. ramosus Ginsburg 1947 and the Panamanian B.
andrei (Sauvage 1880). B. ramosus is now reported from Clarión Island, Revillagigedos, and also from Cocos Island.
Meristic variation of ramosus is tabulated for local populations and PCAanalysis of their morphometry suggests regional
differentiation in this species, with Tres Marias and Revillagigedos populations clustering away from mainland and Mon-
tuosa material. An insular species, B. lineatus (Jenyns 1842) from the Galapagos is defined, with B. arundelii (Garman
1899) from Clipperton Island and B. l. lupinus Ginsburg 1947 from Lobos de Afuera, off Peru, placed as nominal sub-
species of lineatus. This species resembles the Indo-west Pacific B. fuscus and Atlantic basin B. soporator more closely
than it does ramosus and andrei and may be the product of transpacific dispersal. A similar origin for B. ramosus is dis-
cussed but it seems more likely that both B. ramosus and B. andrei have Caribbean sister species.
Key words: Eastern Pacific, Gobiidae, Bathygobius, islands, species definition, relationships.
Bathygobius Bleeker 1878 is a circum-
tropical assemblage of gobiid fishes, which,
despite their generic name, are essentially lit-
toral in habitat. In the Indo-West Pacific
region, at least a dozen species are probably
eligible for inclusion in the genus. Those
occurring in Japanese waters have been
described in detail by Akihito & Meguro
(1980) and further summarised by Akihito et
al. (1988) while Hoese (1986) has distin-
guished eight species of Indo-Pacific prove-
nance in the warm-water fauna of southern
Africa. In the Atlantic basin, three forms are
currently listed from tropical West Africa, two
endemics (B. casamancus (Rochebrune) and
B. burtoni (O’Shaughnessy)) and the amphi-
atlantic B. soporator (Valenciennes) (Miller
& Smith 1989). In the western Atlantic, as
well as the last named, there are a further two
species, B. curacao (Metzelaar) and B .
mystacium Ginsburg (Ginsburg 1947, Böhlke
& Chaplin 1968, Rubinoff & Rubinoff 1971).
For the tropical eastern Pacific region
(Briggs 1974), Ginsburg (1947) recognised
four species, two essentially continental
(ramosus Ginsburg and andrei (Sauvage)),
lineatus (Jenyns) at the Galapagos and arun -
delii (Garman) from the remote island of
Clipperton, as well as various subspecies
within the first three. The present work has
rexamined eastern Pacific Bathygobius mate-
rial in the light of Ginsburg’s revision, using
Received: 17-III-2000 Corrected: 23-XI-2000 Accepted: 8-XII-2000
R E V I S TA DE BIOLOGIA T R O P I C A L142
V I origin to tip of longest pelvic ray.
Lateral-line system (Fig. 1). Terminolo-
gy of sensory papillae (free neuromast) series
and rows, and of head canal pores, as Miller
and Smith (1989). Sensory papillae and
pores are minute in Bathygobius. Under low-
power binocular microscope, oblique lighting
from a narrow (1 mm) fibre-optic light guide
is often sufficient to reveal these structures,
but iron tannate staining, differentiating with
1% nitric acid (De Buen 1923), may be nec-
essary in some cases. Counts of papillae are
not given, but numbers shown in Fig. 1 are
approximately as found in the specimen
drawn.
C o l l e c t i o n s. Abbreviations for collec-
tions are those of Leviton et al. (1985).
GENERIC IDENTIFICATION
Bathygobius was introduced by Bleeker
(1878) for the Indo-Pacific G o b i u s
petrophilus Bleeker and G. nebulopunctatus
Valenciennes in a species-list without desig-
nation of type-species or diagnosis of the
genus. According to Koumans (1931), Meek
& Hildebrand (1928) designated G. nebulop -
unctatus as the type-species, a form now syn-
onymised with G. fuscus Rüppell (Akihito &
Meguro 1980). Mapo Smitt (type-species
Gobius soporator Valenciennes) and Chlamy -
des Jenkins (type-species Ch. laticeps Jenkins
= G. cotticeps Steindachner) have long been
incorporated into B a t h y g o b i u s (Meek &
Hildebrand 1928, Akihito & Meguro 1980),
as have, more recently, the monotypic west-
ern Indian Ocean Pyosices (type-species P.
niger Smith) and Koumansiasis (type-species
K. macrocephalus Rao) (Hoese & Winterbot-
tom 1979).
Bathygobius is a circumtropical gobioid
genus characterised by the goby-grade fea-
tures of a fused pelvic disc and in the skeleton
by (i) five branchiostegal rays, (ii) endoptery-
goid absent; (iii) urohyal lacking lateral
ridges; (iv) pectoral girdle with hypercora-
coid (scapula) reduced, deeply notched from
below; (v) hypocoracoid (coracoid) small,
additional criteria (Akihito & Meguro 1980,
Miller & Smith 1989, and present observa-
tion) to the essentially meristic and morpho-
metric ones employed by that author. In par-
ticular, the systematic status of Bathygobius
from the eastern Pacific islands has been
addressed. The work is based on study of
available type-material in conjunction with
collections from the Los Angeles County
Museum and new material from Clipperton
Island.
METHODS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Meristics. A, anal fin; C, caudal fin; D1,
D2, first and second dorsal fins; LL, scales in
lateral series (from axilla along lateral mid-
line, excluding scales over origin of C if pre-
sent); P, pectoral fin; Pd, predorsal scales (Pd
along dorsal midline forwards from origin of
D1); Tr, scales in transverse series (from ori-
gin of A obliquely upwards and rearwards to
base of D2); V, pelvic disc. Last bifid ray of
D2 and A counted as one.
Morphometrics (Tables 1, 2, 4, 5). Ab,
anal fin base; Ad and Aw, body depth and
width at anal fin origin; Cl, caudal fin length;
Chd, cheek depth (lower border of eye to
level of angle of jaws); Cp and Cpd, caudal
peduncle length (end of A base to origin of C)
and depth (minimum); D1b and D2b, first and
second dorsal fin bases; E, eye diameter;
E/Pdsc(length of postorbital unscaled nape
along oculoscapular groove); H, Hw, Hd,
head length (snout to midline opposite upper
origin of opercle), width (between upper ori-
gin of opercles), depth (at latter position); I,
interorbital width; Pl, pectoral fin length; Po,
postorbital length; Sl, standard length; Sn,
snout length; Sn/A and Sn/An, distance from
snout to vertical of anal fin origin and anus;
Sn/D1 and Sn/D2, distance from snout to ori-
gin of first and second dorsal fins; Sn/V, dis-
tance from snout to vertical of pelvic spinous
ray origin; Ujl, upper jaw length (midline to
lateral end); V/An, distance from origin of
pelvic spinous ray (V I) to opposite anus; Vd,
body depth at origin of V I; Vl, distance from
I N T E R N AT I O N A L J O U R N A L OF T R O P I C A L B I O L O G Y AND CONSERVAT I O N 143
Fig. 1. Head lateral-line sensory papillae and canal pores (Greek letters) of Bathygobius ramosus, male, 61 + 15 mm
(LACM 30108-9, part), Guancastre Province, Costa Rica, in (A) lateral and (B) dorsal views, and (C) mental region
(enlarged). AN, PN, anterior and posterior nostrils; D, “deltoid” configuration of infraorbital row c; UL, LL, upper and
lower lips; MF, mental fold; other abbreviations as Miller & Smith (1989).
R E V I S TA DE BIOLOGIA T R O P I C A L144
d; (ii) lower cheek groove housing anterior
section of row c, which is joined caudad by
row cp; (iii) trapeziform transverse mental
flap, bordered posteriorly by transverse row f;
and (iv) branched free upper pectoral rays; (v)
10 + 17 vertebrae (Akihito & Meguro 1980,
Miller & Smith 1989).
Bathygobius has most affinity with the
exclusively Indo-West Pacific I s t i g o b i u s
(type-species Gobius ornatus Rüppell 1830)
in the symplesiomorphy of a shortened
hyomandibular row b. The two genera both
possess free pectoral rays, at least in the type
species of Istigobius (Murdy & Hoese 1985),
and the latter shows incipient cheek grooving.
The osteology of Bathygobius and Istigobius
is also similar (Peters 1983, Murdy 1985,
Miller & Smith 1989). However, Istigobius
differs from Bathygobius in (i) larger head
scales; (ii) more convex snout profile; (iii) a
merely bulb-like mental protuberance, and
(v) only 10 + 16 vertebrae (Murdy & Hoese
1985).
The Eastern Pacific species examined in
the present work all possess the diagnostic
features of Bathygobius noted above, and
have the following features in common: (i)
cheek naked; (ii) anterior nasal opening short,
erect, tubular, without a short process from
rear rim; and (iii) lower jaw with inner row of
about 4-5 enlarged lateral caniniform teeth.
The head lateral-line system (as illustrated in
Fig. 1 for B. ramosus) has (i) anterior and
posterior oculoscapular canals separate, and
(ii) interorbital part of anterior oculoscapular
canal with well separated single pores lamb-
da and kappa, all canal pores being very
small. Meristic characters include an almost
invariable count of second dorsal rays I/9 and
anal rays A I/8 (Table 3 and text). Coloration
is variable, with three oblique dark bands
across body and more or less evident longitu-
dinal pale striae corresponding to the focal
axis of scales; head with dark oculoscapular
blotches and a scapular blotch at the upper
origin of the pectoral fin.
opposite lower corner of fourth radial (Miller
& Smith 1989). Among goby-grade gobioids,
Bathygobius belongs in an extensive group of
Old World genera (including Amoya Herre,
Arenigobius Whitley, Cabillus Smith, Cryto -
c e n t ro i d e s Popta, G o b i o p s i s S t e i n d a c h n e r,
I s t i g o b i u s W h i t l e y, P a r k r a e m e r i a W h i t l e y,
Porogobius Bleeker and Silhouettea Smith)
with (i) longitudinal infraorbital papillae
rows a and c, former around eye, and neither
with transverse proliferation; (ii) delta config-
uration of papillae at anterior end of row c;
(iii) well developed ancillary infraorbital row
cp; (iv) transverse rows r and s
3
, (v) a longi-
tudinal row s;(vi) row f a single transverse
row behind rear edge of mental flap; (vii) lon-
gitudinal row n; (viii) single anterior interor-
bital pore lambda; (ix) pore beta present; and
in skeleton (x) first dorsal fin pterygiophore
sequence of 22110, (xi) one epural; (xii) post-
maxillary crest on premaxilla; and (xiii) fan-
shaped glossohyal (Miller & Smith 1989,
McKay & Miller 1997).
Bathygobius itself may be characterised
by the combination of (i) lateral preorbital
protuberance enclosed by papillae rows c and
Fig. 2. Diagrams of free fin-ray branching in uppermost
six pectoral rays (1-6) in (A) Bathygobius ramosus, based
on male, 70 + 17.5 mm, Montuosa Island, Gulf of
Chirique, and (b) B. andrei, based on female, 67 + 18
mm, Guatemala.
145
to 38.5 + 10.5, and four unsexed, 21.5 + 6 to 35 + 10 mm
(LACM 33546-2), ENE Cape Henslow, Socorro Island,
Revillagigedos Islands, 15 ii 1971, RV Searcher; ten
males, 28 + 7.5 to 47.5 + 13.5, twelve females, 28 + 7.5
to 67 + 19 , and one juvenile, 20.5 + 6 mm (LACM
22697), Sulphur Bay, Clarión Island, Revillagigedos
Islands, 17 iii 1939. ELSALVADOR: seven males, 44 +
11.5 to 80 + 23, and four females, 35 + 9 to 51 + 14 mm
(GCRL), C. E. Dawson. COSTA RICA: three males, 48
+ 13 to 61.5 + 16, and nine females, 30 + 9 to 47 + 12.5
mm (LACM 30108-9), Playa de Tamarinda de Nicoya,
Guancaste prov., 21 i 1964; four males, 42 + 12 to 52.5 +
15.5 mm (LACM 6569-4), Pital, 2 mi S Ta r c o l e s ,
Puntarenas, 29 xii 1962, W. Bussing and A. Obando;
eight males, 28.5 + 8 to 46 + 12, six females, 29 + 8 to
52 + 13.5, and eight juveniles, 10.2 + 2.8 to 22 + 6 mm
(LACM 6894-32), Playa del Coco, 13 vii 1964; five
males, 32 + 8 to 57 + 17, and eight females, 25.5 + 7 to
44.5 + 11.5 mm (LACM 32257), and one male, 35 + 9.5
mm (CAS 206080), (5 33 20N, 87 02 50W); one male, 34
+ 9, and three females, 21.5 + 5.5 to 38.5 + 10 mm
(LACM), Chatham Bay, Cocos Island 28 xii 1998, J. E.
McCosker. PANAMA: 23 males, 34.5 + 8 to 74.5 + 20.5,
and five females, 35 + 9 to 41.5 + 9.5 mm, Montuosa
Island, Gulf of Chiriqui, 12 xii 1998, C. R. Robertson;
ECUADOR: one male, 37 + 10, and six females, 34 + 9.5
to 63 + 16 mm (LACM 33906-11), Guayas, 37 mi N
Santa Elena, 21 v 1970, J. De Weese. PERU: two males,
49.5 + 13 and 81 + 21.5 mm (LACM 33907-6), Piura, 2
mi S Mancora, 37 mi NNW Paita; three males, 45 + 12
to 58 + d, and six females, 41 + d to 48.5 + 14 mm
(USNM 143028, paratypes of B. r. micromma), Paita.
Description. Pectoral rays 19-20 (18-21:
see Table 3 for meristic values); uppermost
BATHYGOBIUS RAMOSUS GINSBURG
1947
Bathygobius ramosus G i n s b u rg 1947: 281
(= B. ramosus
1
Ginsburg 1947: 281)(Balboa, Panama);
Allen & Robertson 1994: 259; Hoese, in Fischer et al.
1995: 1134.
Bathygobius ramosus ramosus G i n s b u rg 1947
(= B. ramosus
2
Ginsburg 1947): 282.
Bathygobius ramosus micromma Ginsburg 1947
(=B. micromma
2
Ginsburg 1947): 282 (Paita, Peru).
Bathygobius ramosus longipinnis Ginsburg 1947
(=B. longipinnis
2
Ginsburg, 1947): 282 (Socorro Island,
Revillagigedos Islands, Mexico).
Material. MEXICO: 10 males, 30 + 8 to 65 + 18,
and 18 females, 31 + 7.5 to 75 + 20 mm, Agua Verde Bay,
Gulf of California, LACM 20135; three males, 39 + 10 to
51 + 14, four females, 25.5 + 7 to 58 + 15, and two juve-
niles, 22 + 6 and 27 + 7 mm, Chileno Bay, N. of Cabo
San Luca, Gulf of California (LACM 31784-14), 19-20 ii
1971, RV Searcher #59; one female, 31.5 + d mm
(USNM 002474, paratype of B. r. curticeps), Baja Cali-
fornia; one female, 55.0 + d mm (USNM 002327,
paratype of B. r. curticeps), Baja California; three males,
21 + 6.5 to 45 + 13, one female, 54 + 15, and five juve-
niles, 19 + 5.5 to 21.5 + d mm, Guerrero, 1.5 mi SE
Papanoa (17 20 N, 101 01 W), LACM 9044-41; five
males, 46 + 12 to 82 + 24.5, and three females, 51 + 15
to 60.5 + 16 mm, Isabella Island, Sinaloa (LACM 20132,
as soporator), 2 iv 1937, Velero III; eight males, 40 + 11
to 77 + 22.5, and six females, 40 + 10.5 to 48 + 14 mm
(LACM 22194), Tres Marias Island, Magdalena Islands;
eleven males, 25 + d to 60 + 16.5, four females, 28.5 + 8
Key to Eastern Pacific species of
Bathygobius
1a. Pectoral free rays, typically the first and invariably the remaining four, branched at least twice (Fig 2A); first dor-
sal fin distinctly pigmented to distal edge (Fig. 3A); postorbital dark blotches on oculoscapular groove large, elon-
gate medially (Fig 4C); pelvic disc more or less rounded, with large lateral lobes, sometimes attenuate, and disc
length about two-thirds to four-fifths abdomen (Fig. 5C); pectoral rays 19-20 (18-21); scales in lateral series 34-36
(32-38). Baja California to Peru, Revillagigedos and Cocos Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ramosus
1b. Pectoral free rays only bifid (Fig. 2B); first dorsal with at least distal periphery pale (Fig. 3B,C); postorbital dark
blotches on oculoscapular groove small, not produced medially (Fig. 4A,B); pelvic disc usually more or less ellip-
tical, sometimes circular, lateral lobes not attenuate and disc length at least four-fifths abdomen . . . . . . . . . . . .2.
2a. First dorsal fin with oblique dark band, most intense at upper anterior and lower posterior areas of fin (Fig. 3B);
opercle typically with small patch of scales in upper anterior corner; pelvic disc not reaching anus, lateral lobes vari-
able (Fig. 5B); pectoral rays 21-22 (20-22); scales in lateral series 34-36 (33-36); Guatemala to Ecuador . .andrei
2b. First dorsal fin with horizontal markings, proximal dark lines more intense posteriorly, and an upper clear distal edge
(Fig. 3C); opercle typically without scales (present or absent in Clipperton examples (Fig. 6); pelvic disc (Fig. 5A)
with small lateral lobes, edge of disc often reaching anus; pectoral rays 19-21; scales in lateral series 30-37; Gala-
pagos (lineatus), Clipperton Island (arundelii) and Lobos de Afuera, Peru (lupinus) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .lineatus
I N T E R N AT I O N A L J O U R N A L OF T R O P I C A L B I O L O G Y AND CONSERVAT I O N
R E V I S TA DE BIOLOGIA T R O P I C A L146
length 8.8-11.4 (see Tables 1 and 2 for
descriptive morphometric values); posterior
tip of second dorsal extending to above cau-
dal fin base in males, to upper origin of cau-
dal in females. Coloration with large dark
postorbital blotches, extending medially from
oculoscapular furrow and larger in area then
pupil; scapular blotch dark; lateral midline
with blotches not markedly extending below
lateral midline; first dorsal fin more or less
dusky to distal edge, lacking pale band, and
with more proximal dark longitudinal band
indistinct except as darkening on rear interra-
dial membranes; caudal fin with distinct ver-
tical markings; head with small white ocelli
variably evident on lower cheek and opercle.
Distribution. As Ginsburg (1947) noted,
this species appears to be “the commonest
and most widespread species of Bathygobius
on the Pacific coast of the American conti-
nents” and ranges from southern Baja Cali-
fornia to Peru (Ginsburg 1947, Thomson et
a l . 1979). This extensive distribution
embraces both the Mexican and Panamanian
provinces of the Eastern Pacific region (Brig-
gs 1974). Bathygobius ramosus also occurs at
both nearshore islands (such as the Tr e s
Marias, Mexico and Montuosa Island in the
Gulf of Chirique) as well as at the more off-
shore Revillagigedos (Ginsburg 1947, Ricker
1959), including the most distant Clarión
Island, and also Cocos Island (5
o
3 3 ’ N ,
8 6
o
59’W) (present material). B a t h y g o b i u s
reported from Malpelo Island off Colombia
have not been available for study but may be
predicted to be this species. Habitat. Report-
ed from intertidal rock-pools (Allen &
Robertson 1994). Maximum size to 11.4 cm
(Thomson et al. 1979): the largest male in the
present material is 82 + 24.5 = 106.5 mm TL
and the largest female 75 + 20 = 95 mm TL,
both from northern localities (Isabella Island,
Tres Marias, and Gulf of California, respec-
tively).
Local variation. Ginsburg (1947) distin-
guished four subspecies of ramosus - ramo -
sus, curticeps, micromma and longipinnis -
on the basis of head length, caudal fin, pos-
six rays more or less free from membrane
(Fig. 2A), first usually branched twice, some-
times merely bifid, second ray branched
twice, third and fourth three times, fifth four
times, and sixth five times; secondary and
subsequent branching evident by standard
length of 18 mm. Pelvic disc circular or
somewhat elliptical, about two thirds to four
fifths length of abdomen (pelvic origin to
anus); anterior pelvic membrane with lateral
edges typically produced, angular to attenu-
ate, each up to half length of free edge of
membrane, which may be convex medially in
outline. Scales in lateral series 34-36 (32-38;
see Table 3); opercle without scales; predor-
sal scales (mostly 16-20) extending anteriorly
to at least opposite pore beta, with distance
thence to edge of orbit 2.7-3.9% SL; breast
two-thirds to fully scaled. As %SL, caudal fin
24.2-29.6, pectoral fin length 19.3-26.6,
pelvic disc length 16.2-21.1, caudal peduncle
depth 11.5-13.8, eye 5.5-9.0, upper jaw
Fig. 3. Diagrams of first dorsal fin pattern in (A) Bathy -
gobius ramosus, (B) B. andrei, and (C) B. lineatus.
147
analysis of this species. However, compari-
son of available measurements for the body
proportions noted above (Tables 1, 2) for the
Gulf of California, Tres Marias islands and
Gulf of Chiriqui suggest significant differ-
ence between beween males from Chiriqui
and the other localities in upper jaw propor-
tion, and between males of Tres Marias and
the other localities in postorbital percentage
of standard length. Principal components
analysis (Fig. 7) of available body measure-
ments (excluding upper jaw length and head
depth) indicate some regional differentiation
in ramosus. There is some overlap, but the
Tres Marias and Revillagigedos individuals
cluster apart from mainland and Montuosa
material, where Gulf of California, Costa
Rican and Montuosa values form a sequence
reflecting their latitudinal distribution. Meris-
tic results (Table 3) also correspond with
Ginsburg’s findings that the Revillagigedos
populations, from both Socorro and the more
distant Clarión Island, show more frequent
occurrence of lower pectoral fin-ray counts,
with the lowest value of 18 also found in the
Tres Marias sample, much nearer the main-
land. Geographical variation obviously
requires study at the genetic as well as classi-
cal morphological level and Ginsburg ’s
delimitation of subspecies and present results
could provide a starting point for such inves-
tigation. At present, there would seem most
justification for formal use of the subspecific
name longipinnis for the Revillagigedos and
the Tres Marias populations on the basis of
pectoral counts and morphometry but there is
no morphological case for elevating them to
separate specific rank. Allen & Robertson
(1994) regarded B. arundelii from Clipperton
Island as a synonym of B. ramosus but this is
not the case (see B. lineatus).
BATHYGOBIUS ANDREI (SAUVAGE
1880)
Gobius andrei Sauvage 1880: 44 (Rio Guayas,
Ecuador).
Bathygobius andrei G i n s b u rg 1947: 282
(= B. andrei
1
Ginsburg, 1947: 282), Allen & Robertson
1994: 258; Hoese, in Fischer et al. 1995: 1134.
torbital length, eye, nape and upper jaw, later-
al scale and pectoral ray counts, and extent of
branching of the free pectoral rays. B. r.
longipinnis was represented by samples from
Mexico and northern South A m e r i c a
(Ecuador and Colombia), B. r. ramosus from
Panama, B. r. micromma from Peru and B. r.
longipinnis from Socorro island in the Revil-
lagigedos. In the present work, limited mate-
rial does not permit a detailed morphometric
Fig. 4. Diagrams of postorbital blotches (pb) in (A B. lin -
eatus, male, 45 + 11.5 mm (LACM 43689-1, part),
Marchena Island, Galapagos; (B) B. andrei, male, 56.5 +
13 mm (USNM 081934, part), and (C) Bathygobius
ramosus, male, 62 + 17 mm, Montuosa Island, Gulf of
Chirique.
I N T E R N AT I O N A L J O U R N A L OF T R O P I C A L B I O L O G Y AND CONSERVAT I O N
R E V I S TA DE BIOLOGIA T R O P I C A L148
and 117 + 31 mm (NMW 30812-3). COLUMBIA: one
male, 39.5 + 10 mm (LACM 21976), Gorgonia Island, 24
ii 1938, Velero III.
Description. Pectoral rays 21-22 (20:1,
21:24, 22:9); uppermost six rays more or less
free from membrane, first to fourth branched
only once (Fig. 2B). Pelvic disc (Fig. 5B) cir-
cular to somewhat elliptical, four fifths to
nine-tenths length of abdomen; anterior
pelvic membrane with lateral edges more or
less angular, up to half length of free edge of
membrane but typically less pronounced, and
latter without median convexity in outline.
Scales in lateral series 34-36 (33-36; 33:1,
34:10, 35:4, 36:7); opercle with a varying tri-
angular patch of small scales in upper anteri-
or corner, sometimes absent; predorsal scales
19-25, extending anteriorly to at least oppo-
site pore beta, with distance thence to edge of
orbit 1.6-4.8% SL; breast scaled. As %SL,
caudal fin 18.4-30, pectoral fin 16.8-25.1,
pelvic disc length 18-22.6, caudal peduncle
depth 11.8-16.8, eye 6.1-9.6, upper jaw
length 9.2-12.3 (see Table 4 for descriptive
morphometric values); posterior tip of second
dorsal extending to upper origin of caudal fin
in males, not reaching upper origin of caudal
in females. Coloration as Allen & Robertson
(1994); postorbital blotches small, not
extending medially; scapular blotch dark; lat-
eral midline with blotches not markedly
extending below lateral midline; first dorsal
fin with oblique dark band, most intense on
distal part of I/II and II/III membrane and
around origins of IV-VI, and upper posterior
area of fin pale; second dorsal and anal fin
dark, with pale rim; caudal fin dark but mark-
ings indistinct in larger fish; head usually
without pale ocelli.
D i s t r i b u t i o n. A seemingly mainland
species, recorded from Guatemala (Esquitla)
to Ecuador (Guayaquil) (Ginsburg 1947,
Allen & Robertson 1994, present material),
and thus apparently restricted to the Pana-
manian province of Briggs (1974). So far,
this goby has not been reported from those
offshore islands where B. ramosus is found.
Bathygobius andrei andrei Ginsburg 1947: 283
(= B. andrei
2
Ginsburg 1947: 283).
Bathygobius andrei heteropoma Ginsburg 1947:
283 (= B. heteropoma
2
Ginsburg 1947: 283) (Chame
Point, Panama).
Bathygobius andraei Eschmeyer 1998: 98
[Eschmeyer (1998) states that andraei is the original
spelling of this name but reference to Sauvage’s text indi-
cates andrei].
Material. GUATEMALA: Five males, 45 + 13.5
to 118 + 35 mm, and six females, 54 + 14.5 to 89 + 25
mm (GCRL 1451,1458,1461,1463,1469), Esquintla,
1984, C. E. Dawson. PANAMA: two males, 62 + 16 and
96 + 17.7 (USNM 082207, paratypes of Bathygobius
andrei heteropoma), Chame Point, Tweedie; two males,
47 + 12 and 75 + 16, and two females, 56.5 +13 and 60.5
+ 14.5 mm (USNM 081934, paratypes of Bathygobius
andrei heteropoma), Chame Point, Tweedie; two, 90 + 22
Fig. 5. Pelvic disc in ventral view of (A) Bathygobius lin -
e a t u s, male, 78 + 17.5 mm (LACM 4369-1, part),
Marchena Island, Galapagos. (B) B. andrei, 92 + 21 mm,
female, Guatemala, and (C) B. ramosus. a, anus; an, anal
fin; am, anterior membrane; g, urogenital papilla; ll, lat-
eral lobes of anterior membrane; pd, bowl of pelvic disc.
149
29 and 20-23 for the two forms respectively.
It is also evident that male heteropoma have
shorter caudal fins and probably pelvic discs
(Table 4). However all the material examined
here displays a similar pattern of first dorsal
fin pigmentation, as far as can be judged after
preservation, and the subspecific status
assigned by Ginsburg could be retained.
There is obviously a need for ecological
investigation of this morphological species.
The specimen from Colombia has no opercu-
lar scales, an extreme of variation noted by
Ginsburg, but was identified here as andrei
by first dorsal coloration.
BATHYGOBIUS LINEATUS (JENYNS
1842)
Gobius lineatus Jenyns 1842: 95, pl. 19 (fig. 2,2a)
(off San Cristóbal [Chatham] Island).
Gobius arundelii Garman 1899: 63 (Clipperton
Island, Eastern Pacific)
Bathygobius arundelii (Garman): Ginsburg 1947,
Allen & Robertson 1984: 259, Hoese, in Fischer at al.
1995: 1134.
Bathygobius lineatus lineatus (Jenyns) (= Bathy -
gobius lineatus
2
(Jenyns)): Ginsburg 1947: 281, 284.
Bathygobius lineatus lupinus (=Bathygobius lupi -
nus
2
) Ginsburg 1947: 281, 284.
Bathygobius lineatus (Jenyns): Allen & Robertson
1994: 259, Hoese, in Fischer et al. 1995: 1134; Grove &
Lavenberg, 1997: 552, 675, 695.
Material. ECUADOR: San Cristobal [Chatham]
Island, Galapagos: one female, 97 + 23 mm, (BMNH
1917.7.14.53, holotype of Gobius lineatus); Marchena
[Bindloe] Island, Galpagos: sixteen males, 33.5 + 8.5 to
78 + 19 mm, and fifteen females, 29 + 7.5 to 56 + 14 mm
(LACM 43689-1), SW side, tide-pool, 18 v 1984, coll.
GAL84-32. Isabela [Albemarle] Island, Galapagos, three
females, 23 + d to 38.5 + 10 mm and two juveniles, 18 +
5 and 18 + d mm (LACM 21969), 22 I 1938. PERU: two
males, 53 + 13.5 and 68 + 18 mm (USNM 077561,
paratypes of B. l. lupinus), Lobos de Afuera Island.
CLIPPERTON ISLAND: one male, 59 + 18 mm (MCZ
28289, holotype of Gobius arundelii), J. Arundel, 1898;
seven males, 35 + 10.5 to 65 + 20 mm, and three females,
38 + 10 to 45 + 11.5 mm (USNM 334096); two males, 43
+ d and 57 + 16.5 mm, 30 iv 1998, R. Robertson.
Description. Pectoral rays 19-21 (19:18,
20:49, 21:18); uppermost five rays more or
less free from membrane (as Fig. 2B), first to
fourth branching only once. Pelvic disc (Fig.
5A) elliptical, reaching at least four-fifths to
Habitat. The type was collected from
brackish water (Sauvage 1880), and the
species is also reported from both tidepools
and sublittoral areas (Ginsburg 1947). A male
of 118 + 35 mm among the present material
from Guatemala exceeds the maximum size
of about 10 cm suggested by Allen & Robert-
son (1994).
Local variation. Ginsburg (1947)
believed that this species could be divided
into two sympatric subspecies, the typical
form from intertidal habitats and B. a. het -
eropoma which was regarded as probably
derived from deeper water, given the methods
used by Robert Tweedlie, who collected the
type series (Meek & Hildebrand 1923). The
subspecies were distinguished by relative
abundance of opercular scales and by length
of pectoral fin. In the present material, oper-
cular scales have been noted but condition of
the specimens has not permitted precise
counting. However, pectoral fin measure-
ments, as percentages of standard length,
agree closely with Ginsburg’s findings, being
22.1-25.1 (males) and 22.8-24.8 (females) for
andreiother than heteopoma syntypes, whose
pectoral fins are 16.8-21.9 (males) and 19.6
and 23.5 (two females), Ginsburg citing 22-
Fig. 6. Opercular scales (op) and associated structures
(sensory papillae and canal pores) in holotype of Gobius
arundelii, male, 59 + 18 mm (MCZ 28289), Clipperton
Island. Other lettering as Fig. 1.
I N T E R N AT I O N A L J O U R N A L OF T R O P I C A L B I O L O G Y AND CONSERVAT I O N
R E V I S TA DE BIOLOGIA T R O P I C A L150
part of fin pale; second dorsal fin with dark
and pale bands; anal fin dusky, with with dark
line proximal to white distal edge; caudal fin
with dark markings more or less defined.
Distribution. An insular form, not only
from the Galapagos province of the Eastern
Pacific region (Briggs 1974) but also from
Clipperton Island, an isolated atoll at
10°18’N, 109°13’W, and Lobos de Afuera
(6°57’S, 80°43’W), small islands about 40 mi
off northern Peru (Ginsburg 1947, Allen &
Robertson 1994). At the Galpagos, the
species is recorded throughout the archipel-
ago (at Baltra, Bartolomé, Fernandina, Flore-
ana, Gardner, Isabela, Marchena, Santa Cruz,
Santiago, San Cristóbal, Tower and Wolf)
(Grove & Lavenberg 1997) Habitat. Collect-
ed from intertidal rock-pools (Allen &
Robertson 1994), where the species is said to
dominate the shallow tidepool habitat (Grove
& Lavenberg, 1997).
Local variation. If coloration of the first
dorsal fin (Fig. 3) is used as the prime char-
acter for distinguishing morphological
species and putatively of biological signifi-
cance, rather than morphometric and meristic
values, and the apparently variable opercular
scales, then the eastern Pacific Bathygobius
fall clearly into three forms - ramosus, andrei
and l i n e a t u s . Within l i n e a t u s, Garman’s
species a ru n d e l i i from Clipperton Island,
maintained as such by Ginsburg (1947), must
be regarded as a morphological subspecies of
lineatus because the first dorsal pattern agrees
with that of the Galapagos lineatus. The
Bathygobius material now examined from
Clipperton Island includes the holotype,
which has opercular scales (Ginsburg 1947,
and shown here in Fig. 6), and a more recent
collection of fish among which no opercular
scales could be detected. In other respects,
these individuals closely resemble the holo-
type. Most display an iridescent blue scapular
blotch which is not evident in the latter which
has been about a century longer in preserva-
tive. The Clipperton Island specimens differ
in number of scales in lateral series (30-34;
30:2, 31:3, 32:2, 33:3, 34:1) from the Galapa-
entire distance to anus; anterior pelvic mem-
brane with lateral lobes one seventh to two-
fifths width of free edge, which is concave in
outline. Scales in lateral series 30-37 (see
Local Variation); opercle with or without a
patch of small scales in upper anterior corner;
predorsal scales 18-21, extending anteriorly
to between pores beta and alpha, with dis-
tance thence to edge of orbit 2.0-3.58% SL;
breast scaled. As %SL, caudal fin 22.2-27.9,
pectoral fin 22.6-26.3, pelvic disc length 20-
22.8, caudal peduncle depth 11.8-14.0, eye
6.6-8.9, upper jaw length 8.17-10.3 (see Table
5 for descriptive morphometric values); pos-
terior tip of second dorsal not extending
beyond upper origin of caudal fin. Coloration
as Allen & Robertson (1994) and Grove &
Lavenberg (1997); postorbital dark blotches
small, not extending medially; scapular
blotch prominent, more or less bluish; head
with numerous small white ocelli on lower
cheek and opercle; first dorsal fin with proxi-
mal pale band at base, two longitudinal dark
lines, lower and wider more intense on V/VI
membrane and postdorsal membrane; upper
Fig. 7. Plot of scores for factors 2 and 5 from principal
components analysis of body proportions in six samples
of Bathygobius ramosus, from localities indicated by
symbols. Measurements as described in Methods and
Abbreviations. Solid line encloses specimens from Tres
Marias Islands and Revillagigedos, broken line those
from mainland and Gulf of Chirique (Montuosa Island)
localities.
151
Clipperton Island population, whose apparent
variablity in opercular squamation may indi-
cate a more complex systematic situation. In
the meantime, the three taxa may be regarded
as conspecific morphological subspecies.
AFFINITIES
Using lateral-line criteria, the genus
Bathygobius can be subdivided into three
groups : (i) an Indo-West Pacific line of
cyclopterus, niger and cotticeps, with contin-
uous oculoscapular canals above the preoper-
cle, and the horizontal hyomandibular row d
separate from its anterior supralabial part.
These species also show the distinctive
gos and Lobos de Afuera material, which has
34-37 (34:3, 35:10, 36: 12, 37: 7). Ginsburg
(1947) distinguished the Lobos de Afuera lin -
eatus as a separate subspecies - lupinus - on
the basis of caudal peduncle depth, percent-
ages of standard length being 11.5-14.5 for
Galapagos lineatus and 14.5-15.5 for lupinus.
Present measurements for males indicate
12.5-14.0 for the former, and 13.2 and 14.4
for the two male paratypes of lupinus. Other-
wise the two localities correspond exactly in
meristic and other morphometric values. It is
apparent that the Galapagos and Lobos de
Afuera populations are much closer in mor-
phology to each other than they are to the
TABLE 1
Body proportions of male Bathygobius ramosus, from Agua Verde Bay (Gulf of California), Tres Marias Islands and
Montuosa Island (Gulf of Chirique), and Clarion Island (Revillagigedos), as percentage of standard length.
Area Agua Verde Tres Marias Montuosa Island Clarion
SL(mm) 41-65 40-77 49.0-74.5 47.5
N 6 8 12 1
H 24.4-27.7 (26.2,1.15) 26.6-29.3 (27.7,0.89) 26.0-30.2 (27.9,1.31) 25.3
Sn/D1 33.6-36.9 (35.0,1.16) 34.9-37.2 (36.5,0.70) 34.2-38.0 (36.0,1.30) 33.7
Sn/D2 53.8-63.8 (56.7,3.76) 55.6-57.9 (56.8,0.85) 54.8-60.4 (57.0,1.55) 54.7
Sn/AN 51.2-53.1 (52.3,0.63) 51.7-57.9 (53.7,2.36) 51.0-56.4 (54.3,1.60) 51.6
Sn/A 56.0-58.5 (57.2,0.96) 57.3-62.3 (59.2,1.64) 56.7-61.7 (59.4,1.56) 54.7
Sn/V 26.3-28.9 (27.8,0.89) 23.0-30.5 (28.8,2.46) 27.9-32.1 (30.3,1.40) 25.7
V/An 23.3-25.3 (24.7,0.72) 22.0-28.6 (24.7,2.50) 22.3-26.0 (23.8,1.25) 24.9
Cp 22.2-24.0 (23.1,0.75) 20.6-26.3 (23.5,1.88) 20.0-22.9 (21.4,0.99) 21.2
D1b 11.9-13.9 (12.5,0.83) 0.8-13.1 (12.1,0.77) 11.5-13.9 (13.0,0.79) 13.1
D2b 23.1-25.0 (23.9,0.96) 19.4-24.8 (22.2,1.74) 22.2-25.7 (23.7,1.10) 22.3
Ab 17.6-18.9 (18.3,0.55) 16.4-19.0 (17.8,1.01) 16.6-20.5 (18.7,1.12) 20.3
Cl 24.2-27.7 (26.1,1.54) 26.3-29.2 (27.6,1.11) 25.8-28.3 (27.1,0.80) 28.4
Pl 21.3-24.1 (22.7,1.11) 21.6-26.1 (23.6,1.37) 19.3-23.3 (21.6,1.28) 23.3
Vl 17.4-20.3 (18.8,1.12) 16.8-18.8 (18.1,0.69) 16.3-19.7 (17.5,0.86) 18.3
Vd 18.1-19.1 (18.7,0.34) 17.2-20.2 (18.4,1.03) 17.3-20.7 (19.3,1.01) 17.9
Ad 16.9-19.1 (18.0,0.78) 16.3-18.2 (17.4,0.61) 15.7-18.3 (17.7,0.71) 17.9
Aw 12.7-14.5 (13.6,0.70) 9.7-11.1 (10.6,0.48) 12.2-14.3 (13.3,0.55) 10.8
Cpd 12.0-13.2 (12.5,0.38) 12.1-13.6 (12.6,0.53) 11.9-13.8 (13.0,0.60) 13.4
Hw 15.3-16.9 (16.2,0.59) 15.4-16.9 (15.9,0.50) 14.7-16.8 (15.9,0.68) 14.0
Hd 15.3-18.9 (18.1,1.37) 16.7-17.5 (17.0,0.37) 17.5-21.0 (19.0,1.01)
Sn 4.4-7.2 (5.8,0.90) 5.1-8.3 (6.3,0.97) 5.4-7.8 (6.7,0.70) 5.0
E 6.5-8.5 (7.4,0.67) 6.8-8.6 (8.0,0.58) 5.5-8.4 (7.4,0.72) 6.8
Po 12.5-13.5 (12.9,0.37) 13.4-14.7 (14.0,0.45) 12.5-14.5 (13.3,0.69) 12.9
Ujl 8.8-10.1 (9.3,0.47) 9.0-10.1 (9.5,0.50) 10.1-11.4 (10.5,0.44)
Chd 6.4-7.7 (6.9,0.48) 5.7-8.2 (6.6,0.84) 5.4-8.4 (7.2,0.77) 5.2
E/Pdsc 2.8-3.5 (3.1,0.32) 3.1-3.9 (3.4,0.36) 2.9-3.9 (3.3,0.40)
I 3.1-4.4 (3.8,0.41) 1.9-3.6 (2.7,0.57) 2.9-6.2 (4.2,0.78) 3.85
%V/An,
V 70.6-81.0 (76.3,3.46) 60.8-82.5 (73.7,7.41) 62.5-79.8 73.7,5.09) 73.6
Values are range, and, in parentheses, mean and standard deviation; N, number of observations.
I N T E R N AT I O N A L J O U R N A L OF T R O P I C A L B I O L O G Y AND CONSERVAT I O N
R E V I S TA DE BIOLOGIA T R O P I C A L152
scales which also characterise the Indo-West
Pacific species (Akihito & Meguro 1980). In
a numerical analysis of Bathygobius species,
Miller & Smith (1989) rooted their most par-
simonious Wagner tree to emphasize an
apparently monophyletic grouping within
B a t h y g o b i u s, comprising the Indo-Pacific
c y c l o p t e ru s, c o t t i c e p s and n i g e r, together
with ramosus. It was then suggested that
ramosus might be derived from common
stock with the former if the Eastern Pacific
barrier had been crossed by such stock after
the closure of the Central American isthmus
(Woodring 1966, Stehli & Webb 1985), or
might represent eastern Pacific survival of an
synapomorphies of a short rounded pelvic
disc with lobate anterior membrane and free
pectoral rays branching more than once; (ii)
the Indo-West Pacific petrophilus with only
one, rather than two, interorbital pores; and
(iii) several species with the more generalised
features of separate anterior and posterior
oculoscapular canals and two interorbital
pores.
All the Atlantic basin and eastern Pacif-
ic species fall into the last category in lateral-
line terms, but ramosus resembles the first
group in extent of branching of free pectoral
rays and in possessing a circular pelvic disc.
However, it lacks the nasal tentacle and head
TABLE 2
Body proportions of female Bathygobius ramosus, from Agua Verde (Gulf of California), Tres Marias Islands (Mexico)
and Clarion Island (Revillagigedos), as percentage of standard length.
Area Agua Verde Tres Marias Clarion
Sl (mm 40-48 45-75 45-67
N 6 6 6
H 26.2-29.3 (27.5,1.13) 26.2-29.3 (27.5,1.13) 26.2-29.3 (27.5,1.13)
Sn/D1 32.7-37.7 (36.0,1.87) 35.5-38.4 (37.1,1.11) 35.1-37.3 (35.8,0.89)
Sn/D2 53.8-57.7 (55.9,1.57) 54.4-61.6 (57.7,2.44) 55.6-58.2 (57.3,1.06)
Sn/An 51.6-58.7 (54.7,2.93) 52.3-57.3 (55.0,1.72) 52.8-55.6 (54.5,1.46)
Sn/A 56.1-63.3 (59.7,2.80) 60.0-63.4 (61.2,1.21) 55.6-60.0 (58.6,1.77)
Sn/V 26.2-30.7 (28.1,1.52) 27.3-32.0 (30.1,1.68) 27.2-30.2 (28.5,1.16)
V/An 25.2-29.3 (27.5,1.78) 22.1-27.5 (24.5,1.82) 24.5-27.1 (25.7,1.11)
Cp 21.6-23.6 (22.6,0.71) 21.4-24.1 (23.1,1.00) 20.3-23.2 (21.5,1.07)
D1b 11.8-12.7 (12.4,0.43) 11.7-13.3 (12.2,0.57) 13.2-13.7 (13.5,0.23)
D2b 21.7-23.4 (22.9,0.63) 20.8-23.4 (21.8,0.981 21.9-23.9 (22.7,0.83)
Ab 16.0-18.3 (17.0,0.81) 15.0-18.5 (16.7,1.27) 18.0-20.0 (19.2,0.74)
Cl 24.2-36.0 (26.7,4.64) 24.8-28.5 (26.9,1.33) 27.0-29.6 (28.0,1.01)
Pl 21.1-23.7 (22.3,0.83) 23.7-25.7 (24.8,0.82) 22.8-26.6 (24.4,1.53)
V 18.1-21.1 (19.4,1.27) 16.2-19.0 (17.3,1.09) 16.5-19.4 (17.8,1.16)
Vd 18.5-20.4 (19.3,0.71) 18.1-20.2 (19.1,0.76) 17.5-19.7 (18.7,0.97)
Ad 16.8-18.5 (17.8,0.56) 16.4-18.6 (17.9,0.82) 17.5-18.1 (17.9,0.29)
Aw 13.1-14.9 (14.5,0.67) 9.6-10.9 (10.3,0.46) 9.8-11.9 (10.8,0.91)
Cpd 11.9-12.7 (12.4,0.28) 11.5-13.0 (12.2,0.62) 12.6-13.6 (13.0,0.36)
Hw 15.9-17.4 (16.6,0.60) 15.4-17.8 (16.6,0.87) 14.8-16.5 (15.6,0.74)
Hd 17.7-20.2 (19.3,0.92) 17.4-17.9 (17.6,0.35) -
Sn 5.2-6.5 (5.9,0.51) 5.2-6.6 (5.9,0.44) 5.4-6.8 (6.1,0.58)
E 7.1-7.8 (7.5,0.33) 8.6-9.0 (8.8,0.21) 7.9-8.6 (8.2,0.29)
Po 12.9-14.3 (13.5,0.54) 13.3-14.7 (14.3,0.59) 12.7-14.1 (13.6,0.57)
Ujl 9.0-9.8 (9.6,0.35) 8.8-10.9 (9.7,1.12)-
Chd 6.3-7.9 (7.2,0.53) 5.7-11.3 (7.0,2.12) 5.9-6.9 (6.4,0.38)
E/Pdsc 2.8-3.8 (3.2,0.37) 2.7-3.0 (2.9,0.20) -
I 3.4-4.7 (4.2,0.46) 2.3-3.7 (2.7,0.52) 2.6-3.5 (3.0,0.4)
%V/An,
V 62.6-83.2 (71.0,7.15) 64.9-76.2 (71.0,3.89) 62.3-74.7 (69.5,4.60)
Values are range, and, in parentheses, mean and standard deviation; N, number of observations.
153
tion for at least 3-5 million years old (Simkin
1984), with shallows since 5-15 mya
(McCosker & Rosenblatt 1984). Alternative-
ly, convergence in extent of pectoral ray
branching and shape of the pelvic disc is seen
in other intertidal gobiids as distant from
Bathygobius, as, for example, some eastern
Atlantic-Mediterranean Gobius and Mauligo -
bius species (Miller 1984, 1986, Brito &
Miller in press). These modifications may be
of adaptive value in the supposedly extreme
intertidal habitat (Horn et al. 1999). The fact
that ramosus does not show the other apo-
morphies, putatively less homoplasious, of
the Indo-West Pacific group may support the
original post-Tethyan circumtropical distribu-
tion, whose Atlantic component became
extinct after the same event. However,
although the putative c y c l o p t e ru s - r a m o s u s
lineage is represented around the Hawaian
archipelago by B. cotticeps (Gosline & Brock
1960), it is not known from the Galapagos,
whose inshore fish fauna is essentially East-
ern Pacific in character, although with Indo-
West Pacific elements (McCosker & Rosen-
blatt 1984), or from other offshore Eastern
Pacific islands, where any ability to cross the
Pacific by this species-group could be most
evident (Greenfield et al. 1970). The Galapa-
gos Islands have been in the appropriate posi-
TABLE 3
Meristic variation in Bathygobius ramosus from Gulf of California to Peru.
D2 8 9 10 N P 18 19 20 21 N
Mv - 25 - 25 Mv - 8 39 1 48
Mb - 7 - 7 Mb - 5 11 - 16
Mm - 14 - 14 Mm 2 13 11 - 36
Mi - 10 - 10 Mi - 6 14 - 20
Rs - 9 1 10 Rs 3 17 - - 20
Rc - 22 1 23 Rc 8 36 2 - 46
Es - 9 - 9 Es - 3 7 - 10
Cc - 27 - 27 Cc - 4 45 3 52
Pm 1 20 - 21 Pm - 13 25 - 38
Ci - 13 1 14 Ci - 3 30 7 40
Pg - 6 1 7 Pg - - 10 2 12
Pp - 2 - 2 Pp - 2 6 - 8
A 7 8 9 N LL 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 N
Mv - 24 - 24 Mv 1 4 12 17 3 1 - 38
Mb - 7 - 7 Mb - 1 6 5 3 - - 15
Mm 1 13 - 14 Mm - - 4 10 7 1 1 23
Mi - 10 - 10 Mi - 1 3 3 1 - - 8
Rs - 9 - 9 Rs - 1 7 6 4 - - 18
Rc - 22 1 23 Rc - 1 4 13 7 1 2 28
Es 1 8 - 9 Es - - 1 5 4 - - 10
Cc - 26 - 26 Cc 1 2 11 11 1 - - 26
Pm 1 20 - 21 Pm 1 2 3 11 2 - - 19
Ci - 14 - 14 Ci - 2 1 9 1 - - 13
Pg - 6 1 7 Pg - - 2 4 1 - - 7
Pp - 2 - 2 Pp - - 5 8 2 - - 15
Counts of second dorsal (D2), anal (A), and pectoral (P) rays, and scales in lateral LL) series, in samples from Agua
Verde Bay, Gulf of California (Mv); Baja California, Mexico (Mb); Magdalena Island, Tres Marias, Mexico (Mm);
Isabella Island, Mexico (Mi); Socorro Island, Revalligigedos (Rs); Clarion Island, Revillagigedos (Rc); El Salvador
(Miller & Smith 1989); (Es), Playa del Coco, Costa Rica (Cc); Cocos Island (Ci); Montuosa Island, Gulf of Chirique
(Pm); Guayas, Ecuador (Pg); Piura and Paita, Peru (Pp); N, number of observations.
I N T E R N AT I O N A L J O U R N A L OF T R O P I C A L B I O L O G Y AND CONSERVAT I O N
R E V I S TA DE BIOLOGIA T R O P I C A L154
The three taxa here grouped under linea -
tus -lineatus from the Galapagos, lineatus
lupinus from Lobos de Afuera and arundelii
from Clipperton - key out to Indo-West Pacif-
ic fuscus or to Atlantic basin soporator, fol-
lowing the characters used by Akihito &
Meguro (1980), Hoese (1986) and Miller &
Smith (1989). The pigmentation of the first
dorsal fin is essentially as in fuscus (Akihito
& Meguro 1980) and soporator (Miller &
Smith 1989). As a complication, arundelii
with opercular scales and also low lateral
scale counts does seem close to the Caribbean
lepidopoma. These populations may be the
remnants of a continuous soporator/fuscus
circumtropical ancestral distribution, subse-
quently extinct on the eastern Pacific main-
land coasts, or represent the eastward periph-
ery of Bathygobius dispersal across the Pacif-
ic in the equatorial countercurrent (Houve-
naghel 1984), perhaps excluded on the conti-
nent by established r a m o s u s and a n d re i .
Other Indo-West Pacific fishes are known
from the Galapagos province and Clipperton
Island (Briggs 1974, Grove & Lavenberg
1997) but do the three subspecies of lineatus
represent the products of secondary local dis-
latter view, and ramosus might be an eastern
Pacific derivative of western Atlantic sopora -
tor stock.
Like ramosus, B. andrei is a distinctive
Eastern Pacific endemic species. The occur-
rence of scales merely in the upper anterior
corner of the opercle, as seen in B. andreiand
B. arundelii, is a feature apparently unrecord-
ed among Indo-West Pacific and eastern
Atlantic B a t h y g o b i u s (Akihito & Meguro
1980, Hoese 1986, Miller & Smith 1989).
The presence of this character in the
Caribbean lepidopoma subspecies of B. cura -
cao is reported by Ginsburg (1947) and could
be viewed as indicating a western Atlantic
sister species, but opercular scales appear to
be variable in the eastern Pacific species and
this peculiar distribution of scales may be of
independent origin in each species. Elec-
trophoretic investigation of 26 gene loci in B.
soporator, B. andrei and B. ramosus revealed
that the two former species were closer genet-
ically than they were to B. ramosus and pre-
dicted divergence time between andrei and
soporator ancestry agreed well with the rise
of the Central American land bridge (Gorman
et al. 1976).
TABLE 4
Body proportions of Bathygobius andrei, from Guatemala and Panama (paratypes of B. a. heteropoma), as percentage
of standard length. Values are range, and, in parentheses, mean and standard deviation; n, number of observations.
Locality Guatemala Panama (heteropoma) Guatemala Panama (heteropoma)
Sex males males females females
SL(mm) 45-118 47-96 54-89 47 60.5
n 5 4 6 1 1
H 28.4-32.2 (29.9,1.35) 25.3-30.6 (27.4,2.36) 28.7-31.5 (29.6,1.00) 31.9 25.6
SN/Dl 36.7-38.9 (37.7,0.92) 33.3-37.9 (35.7,1.89) 36.5-41.4 (38.3,1.80) 41.5 35.5
SN/D2 56.7-57.8 (57.4,0.63) 54.0-57.4 (56.0,1.66) 55.9-60.5 (58.1,1.96) 67 57
SN/AN 52.7-55.6 (54.4, 1.56) 50.0-54.0 (52.6,1.79) 55.1-59.3 (56.6,1.62) 63 52.9
SN/A 57.5-61.1 (59.3,1.30) 56.4-58. 9 (57.3,1.09) .58.8-63.6 (61.4,1.63) 33 28.1
SN/y 28.8-31.1 (30.2,1.18) 27.7-29.3 (28.8,0.77) 28.4-30.6 (29.9,0.84) 28.4 26.1
V/AN 22.5-25.3 (24.0,1.07) 22.9-24.8 (23.8,0.77) 23.7-28.5 (25.8,2.10) 28.9 22.5
Cl 25.6-30. 0 (28.1,2.03) 18.4-25.8 (22.8,3.54) 25.0-29.9 (27.6,1.90) 27.7 24
Pl 22.1-25.1 (23.4,1.11) 16. 8-21.9 (20. 0,2.21) 21.8-24.8 (23.5,1.13) 19.6 23.2
Vl 18.0-22.6 (20.8,1.61) 18.4-20.7 (19.9,1.03) 20.3-22.3 (21.5,0.69) 22.4 19.6
CPd 11-8-14.2 (13.3, 0.87) 13.6-15.0 (14.3,0.56) 13.3-14.3 (13.8,0.43) 16.8 13.2
Hw 16.0-17.8 (16.5,0.71) 15.9-17.7 (17.1,0.83) 15.3-17.4 (16.5,0.70) 19.6 17.4
SN 6-5-7.2 (6.8, 0.25) 5.5-7.9 (6.7,1.01) 6.6-8.5 (7.3,0.70) 7.6 6.1
E 6.1-9.6 (7.7,1.48) 6.1-8.0 (7.2,0.87) 7.3-8.3 (7.8,0.36) 9.5 7.5
Po 14.4-16.8 (15.3,0.94) 12.9-15.3 (14.3,1.17) 14.4-16.7 (15.6,0.77) 15.9 14.1
Uj1 9.7-12.3 (10.9,1.00) 9.4-10.1 (9.7,0.50) 9.9-11.5 (10.4,0.66) 11.1 9.2
E/PDsc 3.7-4.8 (4.2,0.44) 3.0-3.2 (3.1,0.11) 1.6-4.4 (2.9,1.04) 2.5 -
I 1.7-5.1 (3.1,1.17) 3.9-6.7 (5.2,1.16) 1.8-4.5 (3.0,1.03) 3.7 3.6
155
ubica B. arundelii (Garman 1899) y B. l. lupinus Gins-
burg 1947 como subespecies de lineatus.
REFERENCES
Akihito, Prince & K. Meguro. 1980. On the six species of
the genus Bathygobius found in Japan. Japan. J.
Ichthyol. 27: 215-236.
Akihito, Prince, M. Hayashi & T.Yoshino. 1988. Subor-
der Gobioidei. p. 236-289. In K. Masuda, C.
Amaoka, C. Araga, T. Uyeno, & T.Yoshino (eds.).
The Fishes of the Japanese Archipelago, 2nd ed.
Tokai University Press, Tokyo.
Allen, G. R. & D. R. Roberstson. 1994. Fishes of the
Tropical Eastern Pacific. University of Hawaii
Press, Honolulu, 332 p.
Bleeker, P. 1878. Quatrième mémoire sur la faune ichthy-
ologique de la Nouvelle-Guinée. Arch. néerl. Sci.
nat. 13: 35-66.
Böhlke, J. E. & C. C. G. Chaplin. 1968. Fishes of the
Bahamas and Adjacent Tropical Waters. Liv-
ingston, Philadelphia, 771 p.
Briggs, J. C. 1974. Marine Zoogeography. McGraw-Hill,
New York, 475 p.
De Buen, F. 1923. Gobius de la Península Ibérica y
Baleares. Grupos Lesueurii, Colonianus, Affinis, y
Minutus. Mem. Inst. esp. Oceanogr. 3: 121-266.
persal from an Eastern Pacific centre such as
the Galapagos or is the morphological species
lineatus actually polyphyletic with some fus -
cus -type Bathygobius having traversed the
Pacific on a number of occasions ? Such
questions, and hypotheses of relationship
based of necessity on potentially very homo-
plasious morphology, will be addressed by
molecular studies which are now in progress.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the late C. E. Dawson,
K. Hartel, S. Jewett, J. McCosker, R. Robert-
son, S. Smith, J. van Tassell, and A. C.
Wheeler for material, access to collections,
and/or information.
RESUMEN
Se define el género Bathygobius Bleeker y se
redescriben tres especies del Pacífico Oriental. Se
reconoce las especies B. ramosus Ginsburg 1947 y B.
andrei (Sauvage 1880). B. ramosus está en Revillagige-
dos y Cocos. Se define B. lineatus (Jenyns 1842) y se
Table 5
Body proportions of Bathygobius lineatus, from Marchena Island, Galápagos, and Clipperton Island (including holo -
type of Gobius arundelli), as percentage of standard length. Values are range, and, in parentheses, mean and standard
deviantion; n, number of observations
Locality Marchena Island Clipperton Island
Sex males females males females
N 6 8 12 1
H 24.4-27.7 (26.2,1.15) 26.6-29.3 (27.7,0.89) 26.0-30.2 (27.9,1.31) 25.3
Sn/D1 33.6-36.9 (35.0,1.16) 34.9-37.2 (36.5,0.70) 34.2-38.0 (36.0,1.30) 33.7
Sn/D2 53.8-63.8 (56.7,3.76) 55.6-57.9 (56.8,0.85) 54.8-60.4 (57.0,1.55) 54.7
Sn/AN 51.2-53.1 (52.3,0.63) 51.7-57.9 (53.7,2.36) 51.0-56.4 (54.3,1.60) 51.6
Sn/A 56.0-58.5 (57.2,0.96) 57.3-62.3 (59.2,1.64) 56.7-61.7 (59.4,1.56) 54.7
Sn/V 26.3-28.9 (27.8,0.89) 23.0-30.5 (28.8,2.46) 27.9-32.1 (30.3,1.40) 25.7
V/An 23.3-25.3 (24.7,0.72) 22.0-28.6 (24.7,2.50) 22.3-26.0 (23.8,1.25) 24.9
Cp 22.2-24.0 (23.1,0.75) 20.6-26.3 (23.5,1.88) 20.0-22.9 (21.4,0.99) 21.2
D1b 11.9-13.9 (12.5,0.83) 0.8-13.1 (12.1,0.77) 11.5-13.9 (13.0,0.79) 13.1
D2b 23.1-25.0 (23.9,0.96) 19.4-24.8 (22.2,1.74) 22.2-25.7 (23.7,1.10) 22.3
Ab 17.6-18.9 (18.3,0.55) 16.4-19.0 (17.8,1.01) 16.6-20.5 (18.7,1.12) 20.3
Cl 24.2-27.7 (26.1,1.54) 26.3-29.2 (27.6,1.11) 25.8-28.3 (27.1,0.80) 28.4
Pl 21.3-24.1 (22.7,1.11) 21.6-26.1 (23.6,1.37) 19.3-23.3 (21.6,1.28) 23.3
Vl 17.4-20.3 (18.8,1.12) 16.8-18.8 (18.1,0.69) 16.3-19.7 (17.5,0.86) 18.3
Vd 18.1-19.1 (18.7,0.34) 17.2-20.2 (18.4,1.03) 17.3-20.7 (19.3,1.01) 17.9
Ad 16.9-19.1 (18.0,0.78) 16.3-18.2 (17.4,0.61) 15.7-18.3 (17.7,0.71) 17.9
Aw 12.7-14.5 (13.6,0.70) 9.7-11.1 (10.6,0.48) 12.2-14.3 (13.3,0.55) 10.8
Cpd 12.0-13.2 (12.5,0.38) 12.1-13.6 (12.6,0.53) 11.9-13.8 (13.0,0.60) 13.4
Hw 15.3-16.9 (16.2,0.59) 15.4-16.9 (15.9,0.50) 14.7-16.8 (15.9,0.68) 14.0
Hd 15.3-18.9 (18.1,1.37) 16.7-17.5 (17.0,0.37) 17.5-21.0 (19.0,1.01)
Sn 4.4-7.2 (5.8,0.90) 5.1-8.3 (6.3,0.97) 5.4-7.8 (6.7,0.70) 5.0
E 6.5-8.5 (7.4,0.67) 6.8-8.6 (8.0,0.58) 5.5-8.4 (7.4,0.72) 6.8
Po 12.5-13.5 (12.9,0.37) 13.4-14.7 (14.0,0.45) 12.5-14.5 (13.3,0.69) 12.9
Ujl 8.8-10.1 (9.3,0.47) 9.0-10.1 (9.5,0.50) 10.1-11.4 (10.5,0.44)
Chd 6.4-7.7 (6.9,0.48) 5.7-8.2 (6.6,0.84) 5.4-8.4 (7.2,0.77) 5.2
E/Pdsc 2.8-3.5 (3.1,0.32) 3.1-3.9 (3.4,0.36) 2.9-3.9 (3.3,0.40)
I 3.1-4.4 (3.8,0.41) 1.9-3.6 (2.7,0.57) 2.9-6.2 (4.2,0.78) 3.85
%V/An,
V 70.6-81.0 (76.3,3.46) 60.8-82.5 (73.7,7.41) 62.5-79.8 73.7,5.09) 73.6
Values are range, and, in parentheses, mean and standard deviation; N, number of observations.
I N T E R N AT I O N A L J O U R N A L OF T R O P I C A L B I O L O G Y AND CONSERVAT I O N
R E V I S TA DE BIOLOGIA T R O P I C A L156
McCosker, J. E. & R. H. Rosenblatt. 1984. The inshore
fish fauna of the Galapagos Islands, p. 133-144. In
R. Perry (ed.). Key Environments / Galapagos.
Pergamon,Oxford.
Meek, S. E. & S. F. Hildebrand. 1923. The marine fishes
of Panama. Part I. Publ. Field Mus. nat. Hist.
(Zool.) 15 (215): 330 p.
Meek, S. E. & S. F. Hildebrand. 1928. The marine fishes
of Panama. Part III. Publ. Field Mus. nat. Hist.
(Zool.) 15 (249): 709-1045.
Miller, P. J. 1984. The gobiid fishes of temperate Mac-
aronesia (eastern Atlantic). J. Zool., Lond. 204:
363-412.
Miller, P. J. 1986 . Gobiidae, p. 1019-1085. In P. J. P.
Whitehead, M-L. Bauchot, J-C. Hureau, J. Nielsen
& E. Tortonese (eds.). Fishes of the North-eastern
Atlantic and the Mediterranean, vol 3. UNESCO,
Paris, 1015-1473 p.
Miller, P. J. & R. McK. Smith. 1989. The West African
species of Bathygobius (Teleostei:Gobiidae) and
their affinities. J. Zool., Lond. 218: 277-318.
Murdy, E. O. 1985. Osteology of Istigobius ornatus. Bull.
mar. Sci. 36: 124-138.
Murdy, E. O. & D. F. Hoese. 1985. Revision of the gob-
iid fish genus Istigobius. Indo-Pacific Fish. No. 4:
1-41.
Peters, K. M. 1983. Larval and early juvenile develop-
ment of the frillfin goby, Bathygobius soporator
(Perciformes: Gobiidae). Northeast Gulf Sci. 6:
137-153.
Ricker, K. E. 1959. Fishes collected from the Revil-
lagigedo Islands during the 1954-58 cruises of the
“Marijean”. Mus. Contr. Inst. Fish. Univ. Brit.
Columbia No. 4: 1-10.
Rubinoff, R. W. & I. Rubinoff. 1971. Geographic and
reproductive isolation in Atlantic and Pacific pop-
ulations of Panamanian Bathygobius. Evolution
25: 88-97.
Rüppell, W. P. E. S. 1830. Fische des Rothen Meeres, p.
95-141. InAtlas zu der Reise im nordlichen Africa.
Part 3. Frankfurt-am-Main.
Sauvage, H. E. 1880. Description des Gobioides nou-
veaux ou peu connus de la collection du Muséum
d’Histoire Naturelle. Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris
(7) 4: 40-58.
Simkin, T. 1984. Geology of the Galapagos Islands, p.
133-144. In R. Perry (ed). Key Environments /
Galapagos. Pergamon, Oxford.
Smitt, F. A. 1900. Preliminary notes on the arrangement
of the genus Gobius, with an enumeration of its
European species. Ofr. Svensk. Vet. Akad. Forh.
1899: 543-555.
Stehli, F. G. & Webb, S. D. (eds.). 1985. The Great Amer-
ican Biotic Interchange. Topics geobiol. 4: 1-532.
Thomson, D. A., L. T. Findley & A. N. Kerstitch. 1979.
Reef Fishes of the Sea of Cortez. Wiley, New York,
302 p.
Woodring, P. W. 1966. The Panama land bridge as a sea
barrier. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 110: 425-433.
Eschmeyer,W. N. 1998. Catalog of Fishes. 3 vols.: Cali-
fornia Academy of Sciences (Special Publications
of the Center for Biodiversity Resarch and Infor-
mation, No. 1), San Francosco, 2905 p.
Fischer, W., F. Krupp, M. Schneider, C. Sommer, K. E.
Carpenter, & V. H. Niem. 1995. Guía FAO para la
Identificación para los Fines de la Pesca. Pacifico
Centro-oriental. Vol. 2. Vertebrados - Part 1: 647-
1200 p.
Garman, S. 1899. A species of goby from the shores of
Clipperton Island. Proc. New England Zool. Club
5: 63-64.
Ginsburg, I. 1947. American species and subspecies of
Bathygobius, with a demonstration of a suggested
modified system of nomenclature. J. Wash. Acad.
Sci. 37: 275-284.
Gosline, W. A. & V. E. Brock. 1960. Handbook of
Hawaiian Fishes.: University of Hawaii Press,
Honolulu.
Gorman, G. C., Y. J. Kim & R. Rubinoff. 1976. Genetic
relationships of three species of Bathygobius from
the Atlantic and Pacific sides of Panama. Copeia
1976, No. 2: 361-364.
Greenfield, D. W., D. Hensley, J. W.Wiley & S. T. Ross.
1970. The Isla Jaltembra coral formation and its
zoogeographical significance. Copeia 1970, No. 1:
180-181.
Grove, J. S. & R. J. Lavenberg. 1997. The Fishes of the
Galapagos Islands. Stanford University Press,
Stanford, 863 p.
Hoese, D. F. 1986. Family No. 240 : Gobiidae, p. 774-
811. In M. M. Smith & P. Heemstra (eds.). Smiths’
Sea Fishes. Springer, Berlin.
Hoese, D. F. & R. Winterbottom. 1979. A new species of
Lioteres (Pisces, Gobiidae) from Kwazulu, with a
revised checklist of South African gobies and com-
ments on the generic relationships and endemism
of western Indian Ocean gobioids. Life Sci. occ.
Pap. roy. Ontario Mus., No. 31: 13 p.
Horn, M. H., K. L. M. Martin & M. A. Chotkowski
(eds.). 1999. Intertidal Fishes/ Life in Two Worlds.
Academic Press, San Diego, 399 p.
Houvenaghel, G. T. 1984. Oceanographic setting of the
Galapagos Islands, p. 133-144. In R. Perry (ed.).
Key Environments / Galapagos. P e rg a m o n ,
Oxford.
Jenyns, L. 1842. Fish, p.97-172. In The Zoology of the
Voyage of H.M.S. Beagle, Pt. 4. Smith, Elder &
Co., London.
Koumans, F. P. 1931. A Preliminary Revision of the Gen-
era of the Gobioid Fishes with United Ventral Fins.
Imperator, Lisse, 174 p.
Leviton, A. E., R. H. Gibbs, A. Heal & C. E. Dawson.
1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology:
Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional
resource collections in herpetology and ichthyolo-
gy. Copeia 1985 (3): 802-832.
McKay, S. I. & P. J. Miller. 1997. The affinities of Euro-
pean sand gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae). J. nat.
Hist. 31: 1457-1482.