ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Animal and human studies have shown that individuals choose mates partly on the basis of similarity, a tendency referred to as homogamy. Several authors have suggested that a specific innate recognition mechanism, phenotypic matching, allows the organism to detect similar others by their resemblance to itself. However, several objections have been raised to this theory on both empirical and theoretical grounds. Here, we report that homogamy in humans is attained partly by sexual imprinting on the opposite-sex parent during childhood. We hypothesized that children fashion a mental model of their opposite-sex parent's phenotype that is used as a template for acquiring mates. To disentangle the effects of phenotypic matching and sexual imprinting, adopted daughters and their rearing families were examined. Judges found significant resemblance on facial traits between daughter's husband and her adoptive father. Furthermore, this effect may be modified by the quality of the father-daughter relationship during childhood. Daughters who received more emotional support from their adoptive father were more likely to choose mates similar to the father than those whose father provided a less positive emotional atmosphere.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Received 14 November 2003
Accepted 17 December 2003
Published online 29 April 2004
Sexual imprinting in human mate choice
Tamas Bereczkei
, Petra Gyuris
and Glenn E. Weisfeld
Department of Psychology, University of Pe
cs, Ifjusag utja 6, H-7624, Hungary
Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48207, USA
Animal and human studies have shown that individuals choose mates partly on the basis of similarity, a
tendency referred to as homogamy. Several authors have suggested that a specific innate recognition
mechanism, phenotypic matching, allows the organism to detect similar others by their resemblance to
itself. However, several objections have been raised to this theory on both empirical and theoretical
grounds. Here, we report that homogamy in humans is attained partly by sexual imprinting on the
opposite-sex parent during childhood. We hypothesized that children fashion a mental model of their
opposite-sex parent’s phenotype that is used as a template for acquiring mates. To disentangle the effects
of phenotypic matching and sexual imprinting, adopted daughters and their rearing families were exam-
ined. Judges found significant resemblance on facial traits between daughter’s husband and her adoptive
father. Furthermore, this effect may be modified by the quality of the father–daughter relationship during
childhood. Daughters who received more emotional support from their adoptive father were more likely to
choose mates similar to the father than those whose father provided a less positive emotional atmosphere.
Keywords: evolved mating preferences; homogamy; sexual imprinting; phenotype matching
Research has shown that human sex partners resemble
each other in many traits (Mascie-Taylor 1988, 1995;
Weisfeld et al. 1992; Jaffe & Chacon-Puignau 1995; Keller
et al. 1996; Bereczkei et al. 1997; Thiessen 1999). Positive
correlations have been found between their socio-
economic status, age, intellectual ability, education,
personality variables, physical attractiveness, vocational
interests and anthropometric measures. Although hom-
ogamy, or positive assortative mating, appears to be under
the influence of many cultural factors that presumably
render married couples more compatible, its ubiquity
across cultures and species requires an evolutionary expla-
nation. One possible explanation is genetic-similarity
theory, an extension of kin-selection theory (Thiessen &
Gregg 1980; Rushton 1989). If organisms can identify
genetic similarity in strangers, they might exhibit altruism
towards them, with a consequent increase in inclusive fit-
ness. This altruism could take the form of homogamy,
which increases the degree to which parents share genes
with offspring, thereby enhancing genetic representation
in future generations. Homogamy might also prevent gen-
etic complexes coadapted to the local environment from
being disrupted, thereby enhancing reproductive success
(Read & Harvey 1988). Obviously, an extreme degree of
homogamy can impose serious reproductive costs
(inbreeding depression effects) (Blouin & Blouin 1988). It
has been argued that an adaptive compromise has evolved
between the opposing selection pressures of inbreeding
and outbreeding, with individuals choosing a mate with a
moderate degree of homogamy (Bateson 1983). Accord-
ingly, homogamy between non-relatives has been found to
enhance marital stability and fertility, and to lower the rate
Author for correspondence (
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004) 271, 1129–1134 1129 2004 The Royal Society
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2003.2672
of miscarriage in humans (Mascie-Taylor 1988; Rushton
1988; Thiessen et al. 1997).
How is homogamy thought to be achieved? Some ani-
mals have been found to prefer genetically similar mates
(Blaustein et al. 1991; Holmes 1995; Pfennig & Sherman
1995). This may occur by phenotypic matching to self,
through which they use their own phenotype to choose
others with similar phenotypic cues. Obviously, this can
occur only if there is a high correlation between genetic
similarity and phenotypic similarity on traits that individ-
uals use to distinguish potential mates. Much experi-
mental evidence shows that various animals are able to
recognize genetic similarity in unfamiliar individuals on
the basis of shared olfactory and visual cues. For example,
a study of Belding’s ground squirrels (Spermophilus
beldingi) revealed that biological sisters reared apart could
recognize one another and engaged in a significantly lower
rate of aggressive interactions than non-siblings
(Holmes & Sherman 1983).
However, very few studies have examined the possibility
that humans recognize gene-related ‘strangers’ based on
similarity to their own phenotype. These studies have
yielded controversial results. One has shown that a woman
prefers the odour of a man who has significantly more
human leucocyte antigen (HLA) allele matches to her own
alleles than the man with the least preferred odour (Jacob
et al. 2002). Another study revealed that female students
tended to prefer the scent of men who possessed dissimilar
HLA genotypes (Wedekind & Furi 1997). It is not known
what perceptual mechanisms are involved in this feature
detection, and what part of the similarity detection system
is based on innate mechanisms and associative learning.
Furthermore, critics argue that the theory of genetic simi-
larity via phenotypic matching has a possible theoretical
fallacy (Archer 1989; Krebs 1989; Daly et al. 1997). As
relatedness decreases, the probability that individuals
share the gene responsible for altruism will be lower, and
distant relatives or strangers are not likely to carry that
1130 T. Bereczkei and others Sexual imprinting in human mate choice
gene, even though they may be similar in certain traits.
Therefore, discriminatory altruism on the basis of pheno-
typic similarity is uncorrelated with the likelihood of shar-
ing an altruism gene, and would be selected out. As a
consequence, genetic similarity theory will be reduced to
kin recognition.
Imprinting-like mechanisms have been suggested as an
alternative explanation for the mediation of homogamy in
humans (Daly 1989; Bereczkei et al. 2002; Little et al.
2002). Similarity between spouses would arise if individ-
uals acquired mate-choice criteria templates through
exposure to their parents. In cases of sexual imprinting,
as the ethologists called it, an early fixation to a set of
family characteristics will shape mate preferences during
adulthood (Bateson 1964; Lorenz 1965; Bolhuis & Horn
1992). Cross-fostering experiments with birds and mam-
mals have revealed that adults prefer sexual partners that
are similar to the opposite-sex parent that reared them
(Immelmann et al. 1991; Oetting et al. 1995; Kendrick et
al. 1998). For example, supporting his optimal outbreed-
ing theory, Bateson (1988) found that Japanese quail
(Corturnix japonica) prefer to mate with birds that differ
slightly in appearance from their parents and siblings.
Sexual imprinting on the observed features of the
opposite-sex parent during a sensitive period in early
childhood might be responsible for shaping people’s later
mate-choice criteria. Children might internalize their
opposite-sex parent’s phenotype as a template and, at sex-
ual maturity, prefer those who resemble this mental
model. In a recent study comparing more than 300 facial
photographs of family members and controls, the subjects
correctly matched wives to their husband’s mother
(Bereczkei et al. 2002). Furthermore, a higher degree of
similarity was perceived between the husband’s mother
and his wife than between the husband and his wife. These
results suggest that sons fashion a representation of their
mother’s physical appearance and use it for choosing
mates. In another study, similarity was observed between
the facial photographs of husbands and their wife’s bio-
logical father (Gyuris 2003). The subjects correctly
matched husbands to their father-in-law at a significantly
higher mean rate than expected by chance, and a signifi-
cantly higher frequency than matching between husbands
and wives.
However, a crucial limitation of these investigations is
the difficulty of separating the effects of phenotype match-
ing to self and sexual imprinting. Similarity between one’s
spouse and his/her opposite-sex parent might be an arte-
fact, given the 50% overlap between the parents’ and off-
spring’s genetic material. Therefore, if homogamy works
via phenotype matching, it would be responsible for the
similarity between spouse and opposite-sex parent. In this
case, our results about resemblances between family mem-
bers may be a result of innate similarity detection between
spouses, not sexual imprinting on the mother. However,
certain studies suggest that imprinting-like mechanisms
may occur in human mate choice. One study revealed
greater importance of the opposite-sex parent over the
same-sex parent in predicting the hair and eye colour of
actual partners (Little et al. 2002). Similarly, women were
found to prefer the odours of men with HLA alleles that
resembled her father’s HLA alleles but not her mother’s
(Jacob et al. 2002).
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
To disentangle these effects further, the present study
aimed at investigating the mate choices of women from
adoptive families. In light of our hypothesis, sexual
imprinting will have a long-term effect on one’s mate
choice, whether the child and the caring adult were rela-
tives or not. We predicted, therefore, that the women
would choose a mate who resembled their father even
though he was not a biological relative. Alternatively, if
phenotypic matching theory is correct, the women would
prefer mates similar to themselves but not to their adop-
tive father.
(a) Subjects
To test this hypothesis, we applied a method that was used
in an earlier study (Bereczkei et al. 2002). Subjects were shown
photographs of wives, and rated the similarity between each of
them and four possible husbands, one of whom was the actual
spouse. They also rated the degree of similarity between the
wife’s adoptive father at the age when his adopted daughter was
between 2 and 8 years, and her possible husbands. Similarly,
facial photographs of the wife and her adoptive mother were
compared. These photographs were provided by 26 Caucasian
families. Advertisements were placed in three newspapers in
Pecs (Hungary), stating that researchers at the University of
Pecs needed volunteers who had been reared in an adoptive fam-
ily. Additional photographs, as controls, were taken of 198
young men at the age comparable with that of the husbands
(mean age of 28.3 years). They were randomly chosen from
undergraduate and graduate students at university. We took
black-and-white photographs because many of the mothers’ and
fathers’ portraits had been taken several decades ago in this for-
mat. The photographs of the adoptive parents had been taken
when they were young, i.e. when their adopted children were
growing up. All of the photographs were developed and scanned
into a computer, using the Corell Photopaint program.
Three sets of tableaux were made of these individual photo-
graphs. They were standardized for age, length and colour of
hair, position of their head in the photograph, and certain other
traits, to minimize the possible differences between the faces of
target persons and controls. One tableau contained the wife (left
side), and her husband and three controls (right side). The other
set of tableaux was made of the same photographs, with the
exception that the wife was replaced by her adoptive father
(figure 1). The third set showed the adoptive mother next to the
same group photographs (one husband, three controls). Finally,
we had three sets of tableaux, with a total of 182 photographs
of individual faces.
In all, 242 undergraduate (128 female, 114 male) psychology
students were used as independent judges to evaluate similarity.
They were not aware of the aim of the study, and were not per-
sonally acquainted with any of the persons in the photographs.
Eighty-four subjects participated in the first study (wife–hus-
band matching), 82 in the second study (husband–father) and
76 in the third study (husband–mother).
(b) Procedure
Each tableau was projected on a screen in a seminar room,
where up to 10 subjects participated in the experiment at a time.
The subjects were instructed to look at each of the 3 × 26 tab-
leaux thoroughly, match the photographs of the index person
with four possible matches, one of which was the true match.
Sexual imprinting in human mate choice T. Bereczkei and others 1131
(d )(e)
Figure 1. The tableau shows adoptive father when his daughter was between 2 and 8 years old (a) and four possible sons-in-
law (b)–(e). Subjects were asked to make an assessment about the rank of similarity between them. The appropriate match
was (d ).
The subjects ranked the pairs individuals on the basis of simi-
larity. They marked the degree of similarity with numbers from
1 (the most similar) to 4 (the least similar). In the first three
studies, they judged the similarity between the husband and
wife, between the husband and his wife’s adoptive father, and
between the husband and his wife’s adoptive mother, respect-
In the final study, wives were asked to complete a retrospec-
tive attachment test, the EMBU, which assesses adults’ percep-
tions of their parents’ rearing behaviour during childhood. The
short form of the EMBU, with 23 items, provides three fac-
torially derived subscale measures: rejection (e.g. ‘my parents
criticized me and told me how lazy and useless I was in front of
others’); emotional warmth (e.g. ‘my parents showed with words
and gestures that they liked me’); and overprotection (e.g. ‘my
parents wanted to decide how I should be dressed or how I
should look’). In an examination among samples of 2442 stu-
dents from four countries, internal consistency and reliability has
been high (Arindell et al. 1999). In our study, the test was
administered in the subject’s home by a research assistant who
was naive about the point of the study. For each EMBU item,
participants rated themselves on a scale ranging from 1 (no,
never) to 4 (yes, most of the time). Finally, the perceived degree
of similarity between husband and his father-in-law was corre-
lated with the test scores on the EMBU.
(a) Study 1: husband–wife matching
As figure 2 shows, the resemblance between husbands
and their wives exceeded chance. The judges correctly
matched husbands to wives at a significantly higher mean
rate than 25% (31.10%, Wilcoxon z = 5.86, p 0.01).
This percentage significantly exceeds the rate at which a
control was chosen as most similar (22.9%, z = 6.124,
p 0.001). No sex difference was found in the estimation
of similarity; approximately the same proportion of male
and female subjects made the appropriate matches
(Mann–Whitney U = 234.3, p 0.05).
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
husband–wife husband–father husband–mother
Figure 2. The percentage of matches of husband to wife,
husband to wife’s adoptive father, and husband to wife’s
adoptive mother. Significant resemblance was ascribed
between husband and wife, and between husband and wife’s
adoptive father, with a significant difference between the two
mean rates.
(b) Study 2: husband–father matching
Even more similarity was perceived between husbands
and their wives’ adoptive father (figure 2). The subjects
correctly chose the husband as being the most similar to
his father-in-law, on average, in 37.7% of the tableaux,
which exceeds chance level (z = 7.81, p 0.001). Hus-
bands were ranked first on the similarity scale almost twice
as often as controls (20.7%, z = 7.618, p 0.001). No
sex difference was found between subjects (U = 324.3,
p 0.05).
Comparing the results of studies 1 and 2, a higher
degree of similarity was perceived between the wife’s hus-
band and the wife’s adoptive father than between the hus-
band and his wife. The subjects correctly matched
husbands to their fathers-in-law at a significantly higher
frequency than to their wives (37.7% versus 31.1%,
z = 2.85, p 0.01).
(c) Study 3: husband–mother matching
The percentage of matches of husband to wife’s mother
was not significantly above chance level (27.2%,
1132 T. Bereczkei and others Sexual imprinting in human mate choice
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
scores of the adoptive father’s emotional warmth
Figure 3. Percentage of husband–wife’s adoptive father
matching as a function of the father’s emotional warmth.
The more emotional warmth the adoptive daughters received
during their childhood, the more similarity was judged
between their husband and adoptive father.
z = 0.86, p 0.5). No resemblance was found in facial
appearance between husbands and wives’ adoptive mother.
(d) Study 4: exposure to adoptive father
The degree of perceived similarity between the husband
and the wife’s adoptive father was plotted against the
mean scores on the three subscales of the EMBU (figure
3). A regression of emotional warmth on matching fre-
quencies by judges showed a significant positive relation-
ship: women who had been more emotionally supported
by their fathers during childhood were more likely to
choose mates similar to their fathers on facial traits
= 0.510, t = 2.90, p 0.01). No significant relationship
was found for the other subscales: rejection (
= 0.288,
t = 1.285, p 0.05) and overprotection (
= 0.128,
t = 0.633, p 0.05).
This result suggests that those fathers who had provided
emotional warmth for their adopted daughters during
childhood were judged as being more similar to their
daughters’ husbands than those fathers who did not pro-
vide a positive atmosphere. In other words, those fathers
who were most frequent matches to their sons-in-law had
shown more emotional warmth towards their adopted
Our results showed that: (i) significant resemblance was
found between husbands and their wives; (ii) an even
higher degree of similarity was perceived between husband
and the wife’s father (husband’s father-in-law); and (iii)
the more emotional warmth the father provided for his
adopted daughter, the more similarity was perceived
between him and his son-in-law. These findings suggest
that sexual imprinting-like mechanisms play a role in
human mate choice. Although homogamy via phenotypic
matching to self could not be excluded, homogamy may
be achieved more by exposure to the opposite-sex parent
early in life. Preferences for ensuring positive assortative
mating seem to be shaped during the process of bonding
to the opposite-sex parent, and long-term mates will be
selected partly on the basis of resemblance to that parent.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
Our results could also be explained as a result of a fam-
iliarization effect; people generally respond positively to
familiar stimuli. In this case, mother and father alike
should influence their offspring’s homogamous mating,
and people would be attracted to faces with some charac-
teristics of both parents. However, because no resem-
blance was revealed between husband and the adoptive
same-sex parent, that rival hypothesis was rejected.
The recent study and our several earlier researches on
sexual imprinting (Bereczkei et al. 2002; Gyuris 2003)
found significant facial resemblance between wife and
husband. These results are not inconsistent with the possi-
bility that homogamy is promoted by phenotype match-
ing. Phenotype matching seems to influence kin
recognition. Studies have revealed that various vertebrates
can recognize relatives that were reared apart from them
(Blaustein et al. 1991; Pfennig & Sherman 1995). An
innate capacity for kin recognition would be especially
adaptive for species that disperse when young (Weisfeld
et al. 2003). In this case, an assessment of the degree of
kinship would promote altruism and cooperative behav-
iour towards individuals with shared genes.
There is some evidence that people are able to recognize
relatives who share similar facial or olfactory features. A
study found that mothers who had limited contact with
their newborns immediately after birth could recognize
them by olfactory cues alone (Porter 1987). Adult judges
could also match the odours of mothers with those of their
infants, but were unable to match husbands with wives
(Porter et al. 1985). Using visual cues, adult subjects
could match mothers’, fathers’, and their newborn infants’
facial photographs (Christenfeld & Hill 1995). Recently,
Weisfeld et al. (2003) found that participants were able to
identify the odour of most of their first-degree relatives,
but mothers could not recognize their stepchildren, nor
could children recognize their stepsiblings.
We suggest that phenotype matching has less influence
on interpersonal relationships beyond the circle of kinship.
A genetically canalized learning process (sexual
imprinting), rather than direct genetic similarity detection
via phenotype matching, is responsible for the similarity
between spouses. Our studies found that similarity
between oneself and one’s spouse was significantly
exceeded by the similarity between one’s spouse and one’s
opposite-sex parent. A recent study has revealed that eye
and hair colour were positively correlated between part-
ners but the best predictor of the partner’s eye and hair
colour was the opposite-sex parents’ colour traits (Little
et al. 2002).
Our results support the notion of a long-lasting effect
of attachment during childhood on later mating prefer-
ences. In the recent study a positive relationship was found
between the degree of facial similarity between the daught-
ers’ husband and their father and the scores of emotional
warmth provided by these fathers. Similarly, a previous
study revealed a negative correlation between maternal
rejection towards son and spouse similarity (Bereczkei et
al. 2002). All of these results suggest that mate choice
depends on physical and emotional exposure to the
opposite-sex parent, as the sexual imprinting model pre-
dicts. In accordance with this theory, individuals shape a
mental model of their opposite-sex parent’s appearance,
and search for a partner who possesses certain traits
Sexual imprinting in human mate choice T. Bereczkei and others 1133
similar to that perceptual schema. An important difference
between imprinting-like mechanisms and phenotype
matching is that the development of the former definitely
needs social interaction. In this theoretical framework,
homogamy is shaped not by a genetically prescribed rec-
ognition of similarity, but during a learning process that
occurs in a specific direction that is advantageous to gen-
etic reproduction.
One of the referees suggested that emotional investment
by the father to the adopted daughter may be mediated
by their facial resemblance. Fathers may invest more in
adopted daughters who resemble them and so daughters
selecting partners who resemble themselves would also
result in a link between the father–husband facial simi-
larity. A recent study has shown that males react more
favourably to children’s faces that have been morphed to
resemble their own (Platek et al. 2002). These are the chil-
dren whom males are most likely to adopt, and with whom
they would like to spend the most time. If the father’s
investment on adoptive daughters (including emotional
closeness) depends on the degree of their facial resem-
blance, it would explain the similarity between daughters
and husbands which would further support the
imprinting-like effect on mate choice. In a future study,
this effect could be tested by evaluating similarity between
the fathers’ and adopted daughters’ facial photographs.
At present, however, we do not know the particular
attachment and learning mechanisms that are responsible
for homogamy. It is possible that duration of co-residence
or the amount of physical contact would influence the
developmental processes through which individuals
acquire mate-choice criteria from exposure to their par-
ents. A longer period of co-residence might strengthen the
impact of sexual imprinting. However, this hypothesis was
not supported, in that we did not find a significant
relationship between the age at which daughters were
adopted and the degree of similarity between daughter’s
husband and daughter’s adoptive father. It is highly prob-
able that a complex array of environmental factors and
multiple social contacts with parents shapes a mental
model of potential partners. Recent research has shown
that certain contextual family variables, such as presence
or absence of father, trustworthiness of family members,
intensity of emotional stress and security of attachment,
tend to change later life-history traits, including the onset
of maturation, the age of first sexual experience, the length
of stable pair-bonding (Belsky et al. 1991; Kim & Smith
1998; Bereczkei & Csanaky 2001). However, it is not yet
well understood how these adaptive trajectories are linked
to the effects of the opposite-sex parent. Much more
research is needed based on the perspectives of life-history
strategy and sexual imprinting to provide a coherent pic-
ture of these developmental phenomena.
Archer, J. 1989 Why help friends when you can help sisters
and brothers? Behav. Brain Sci. 12, 519–520.
Arindell, W. A. (and 11 others) 1999 The development of a
short form of the EMBU: its appraisal with students in
Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Pers. Individ. Diff.
27, 613–628.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
Bateson, P. P. G. 1964 An effect of imprinting on the percep-
tual development of domestic chicks. Nature 202, 421–422.
Bateson, P. P. G. 1983 Optimal outbreeding. In Mate choice
(ed. P. P. G. Bateson), pp. 257–277. Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.
Bateson, P. P. G. 1988 Preferences for close relations in
Japanese quail. In Acta XIX. Congress Int. Ornith., vol. 1 (ed.
H. Quellett), pp. 961–972. University of Ottawa Press.
Belsky, J., Steinberg, J. & Draper, P. 1991 Childhood experi-
ence, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy:
an evolutionary strategy. Child Dev. 62, 647–670.
Bereczkei, T. & Csanaky, A. 2001 Stressful family environ-
ment, mortality, and child socialization: life-history stra-
tegies among adolescents and adults from unfavourable
social circumstances. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 25, 501–508.
Bereczkei, T., Vo
s, A., Ga
l, A. & Berna
th, L. 1997
Resources, attractiveness, family commitment: reproductive
decisions in mate choice. Ethology 103, 681–699.
Bereczkei, T., Gyuris, P., Koves, P. & Bernath, L. 2002 Hom-
ogamy, genetic similarity, and imprinting; parental influence
on mate choice preferences. Pers. Individ. Diff. 33, 677–690.
Blaustein, A. R., Bekoff, M., Byers, J. A. & Daniels, T. J. 1991
Kin recognition in vertebrates: what do we really know about
adaptive value? Anim. Behav. 41, 1079–1083.
Blouin, S. F. & Blouin, M. 1988 Inbreeding avoidance
behaviors. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 230–233.
Bolhuis, J. J. & Horn, G. 1992 Generalization of learned pref-
erences in filial imprinting. Anim. Behav. 44, 185–187.
Christenfeld, N. J. S. & Hill, E. A. 1995 Whose baby are you?
Nature 378, 669.
Daly, M. 1989 On distinguishing evolved adaptation from epi-
phenomena. Behav. Brain Sci. 12, 520.
Daly, M., Salmon, C. & Wilson, M. 1997 Kinship: the concep-
tual hole in psychological studies of social cognition and
close relationships. In Evolutionary social psychology (ed. J. A.
Simpson & D. T. Kenrick), pp. 265–296. Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Gyuris, P. 2003 Homogamy, imprinting, evolution: mate
choice of women and men rearing in various family environ-
ments. PhD thesis, University of Pe
cs, Hungary. [In Hung-
Holmes, W. G. 1995 The ontogeny of littermate preferences
in juvenile golden-mantled ground squirrels: effects of rear-
ing and relatedness. Anim. Behav. 50, 309–322.
Holmes, W. G. & Sherman, P. W. 1983 Kin recognition in ani-
mals. Am. Sci. 71, 46–55.
Immelmann, K., Pro
ve, R., Lassek, R. & Bischof, H. 1991
Influence of adult courtship experience on the development
of sexual preferences in zebra finch males. Anim. Behav. 42,
Jacob, S., McClintock, M. K., Zelano, B. & Ober, C. 2002
Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with
women’s choice of male odor. Nature Genet. 30, 175–179.
Jaffe, K. & Chacon-Puignau, G. 1995 Assortative mating: sex
differences in mate selection for married and unmarried
couples. Hum. Biol. 67, 111.
Keller, M. C., Thiessen, D. & Young, R. K. 1996 Mate assort-
ment in dating and married couples. Pers. Individ. Diff. 21,
Kendrick, K. M., Hinton, M. R. & Atkins, K. 1998 Mothers
may irreversibly determine male social and sexual prefer-
ences. Nature 395, 229–230.
Kim, K. & Smith, P. K. 1998 Retrospective survey of parental
marital relations and child development. Int. J. Behav. Dev.
22, 729–751.
Krebs, D. 1989 Detecting genetic similarity without detecting
genetic similarity. Behav. Brain Sci. 12, 533–534.
1134 T. Bereczkei and others Sexual imprinting in human mate choice
Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I.
2002 Investigating an imprinting-like phenomenon in
humans. Partners and opposite-sex parents have similar hair
and eye colour. Evol. Hum. Behav. 24, 43–51.
Lorenz, K. 1965 Evolution and modification of behavior. Univer-
sity of Chicago Press.
Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N. 1988 Assortative mating for psycho-
matric characters. In Human mating patterns (ed. C. G. N.
Mascie-Taylor & A. J. Boyce), pp. 61–82. Cambridge Uni-
versity Press.
Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N. 1995 Human assortative mating: evi-
dence and genetic implications. In Human populations: diver-
sity and adaptations (ed. A. J. Boyce & V. Reynolds), pp. 86–
105. Oxford University Press.
Oetting, S., Pro
ve, E. & Bischof, H. 1995 Sexual imprinting
as a two-stage process: mechanisms of information strorage
and stabilization. Anim. Behav. 50, 393–403.
Pfennig, D. W. & Sherman, P. W. 1995 Kin recognition. Sci.
Am. 272, 68–73.
Platek, S. M., Burch, R. L., Panyavin, I. S., Wasserman,
B. H. & Gallup, G. G. 2002 Reactions to children’s faces.
Resemblance affects males more than females. Evol. Hum.
Behav. 23, 159–166.
Porter, R. H. 1987 Kin recognition: functions and mediating
mechanisms. In Sociobiology and psychology: ideas, issues, and
applications (ed. C. Crawford, M. Smith & D. Krebs), pp.
175–204. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Porter, R. H., Cernoch, J. M. & Balogh, R. D. 1985 Odor sig-
natures and kin recognition. Physiol. Behav. 34, 445–448.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (2004)
Read, A. F. & Harvey, P. H. 1988 Genetic relatedness and the
evolution of animal mating patterns. In Human mating pat-
terns (ed. C. G. N. Mascie-Taylor & A. J. Boyce), pp. 115–
131. Cambridge University Press.
Rushton, J. P. 1988 Genetic similarity, mate choice, and fec-
undity in humans. Ethol. Sociobiol. 9, 329–333.
Rushton, J. P. 1989 Genetic similarity, mate choice, and group
selection. Behav. Brain Sci. 12, 503–518.
Thiessen, D. 1999 Social influences on human assortative mat-
ing. In The descent of mind. Psychological perspectives on homi-
nid evolution (ed. M. C. Corballis & S. G. Lea), pp. 311–
323. Oxford University Press.
Thiessen, D. & Gregg, B. 1980 Human assortative mating and
genetic equilibrium: an evolutionary perspective. Ethol.
Sociobiol. 1, 111–140.
Thiessen, D., Young, R. K. & Delgado, M. 1997 Social
pressures for assortative mating. Pers. Individ. Diff. 22,
Wedekind, C. & Furi, S. 1997 Body odour preferences in men
and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations
for simply heterozygosity? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 1471–
1479. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.1997.0204.)
Weisfeld, G. E., Russell, R. J. H., Weisfeld, C. C. & Wells,
P. A. 1992 Correlates of satisfaction in British marriages.
Ethol. Sociobiol. 13, 125–145.
Weisfeld, G. E., Czilli, T., Phillips, K. A., Gall, J. A. & Licht-
man, C. M. 2003 Posible olfaction-based mechanisms in
human kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance. J. Exp.
Child Psychol. 85, 279–295.
... This has received some support in humans as well; relationship quality with a parent has been shown to have small but significant effects on imprinting (Kocsor et al., 2016;Wiszewska et al., 2007). The principles of availability and relationship quality can be applied not only to one's biological parents, however, as siblings and foster-caregivers can also be imprinted on (e.g., Bereczkei et al., 2004;Griffee et al., 2017). Notably, the available targets during this sensitive period are not imprinted upon equally; in species with biparental care-such as humans-parents and siblings of the other sex tend to have a much larger effect on an individual's future mate choice than their same-sex counterparts (Aronson et al., 2011;Bereczkei et al., 2004;Marcinkowska & Rantala, 2012;Marcinkowska et al., 2013). ...
... The principles of availability and relationship quality can be applied not only to one's biological parents, however, as siblings and foster-caregivers can also be imprinted on (e.g., Bereczkei et al., 2004;Griffee et al., 2017). Notably, the available targets during this sensitive period are not imprinted upon equally; in species with biparental care-such as humans-parents and siblings of the other sex tend to have a much larger effect on an individual's future mate choice than their same-sex counterparts (Aronson et al., 2011;Bereczkei et al., 2004;Marcinkowska & Rantala, 2012;Marcinkowska et al., 2013). In fact, some studies have shown that offspring sometimes negatively imprint on their same-sex parent (SSP) for certain traits, meaning that they learn to avoid mates with characteristics like their SSP (Aronsson, 2011;Vos, 1994). ...
... This suggests that because gay and lesbian individuals share the characteristics that they have theoretically imprinted on, they are much more susceptible to assortative mating influences than their heterosexual counterparts. Research on heterosexuals has largely ruled out homogamy as an explanation for imprinting effects following the adoption studies mentioned earlier (e.g., Bereczkei et al., 2004), but eliminating this possibility for gay and lesbian populations is much more difficult, which is reflected in the fact that evidence for imprinting is limited. A few studies, however, have attempted to measure imprinting patterns using traits that may be less subject to genetic influences on human preferences. ...
This paper investigates the role that parental imprinting plays in human mate choice. Sexual imprinting is a process of early childhood learning in which characteristics present in (usually) genetically related individuals are stored in memory for future use in mate selection. Previous research has shown that sex differences exist in imprinting processes, most notably in that children seem most likely to imprint on their other-sex parent. This difference in imprinting for men and women was investigated to determine whether it is a result of sex or sexual orientation, and whether non-heterosexuals would instead imprint on their same-sex parent. Imprinting effects were assessed for a total of 458 participants on a number of characteristics by recruiting a primarily (79.1%) non-heterosexual sample through web-based and snowball sampling methods. Positive imprinting effects were found for the characteristics of eye color, hair color, hair length, race/ethnicity, and smoking, as well as some evidence for a negative imprinting effects in the novel characteristic of shoulder-to-hip ratio. Analysis of the differences in imprinting between sexual orientations showed that imprinting is generally more likely to occur for parents that are the same sex as participants’ ideal partner(s). The findings of the present study suggest that sexual imprinting is sensitive to sexual orientation and that gender differences found in prior research may be due to this effect rather than of the subjects themselves.
... Another predictor of individual differences in partner choice is family resemblance, particularly in relation to the parent whose gender matches that of the partner, and particularly if the individual has a good relationship with that parent. Thus, research has shown that people's partners resemble their family members in aspects, such as eye color, hair color, height, body hair, and general facial appearance (Bereczkei et al., 2002(Bereczkei et al., , 2004Bressan, 2020;Bressan & Damien, 2018;DeBruine et al., 2017;Little et al., 2003;Marcinkowska & Rantala, 2012;Saxton, 2016;Saxton et al., 2017;Valentova et al., 2017;Wilson & Barrett, 1987;Wiszewska et al., 2007;see Štěrbová et al. [2017], however, for weaker effects found in same-sex parents and homosexual individuals). That is, to some extent, individual differences in partner choice are systematic and predictable. ...
... Further, physical similarity may engender feelings of trust (DeBruine, 2005). Heritability of partner choice could also be a factor, with some evidence suggesting an "imprintinglike" effect can be seen in humans (e.g., Bereczkei et al., 2002Bereczkei et al., , 2004Zietch et al., 2011;however cf. Marcinkowska & Rantala, 2012). ...
Full-text available
Studies have indicated that people are attracted to partners who resemble themselves or their parents, in terms of physical traits including eye color. We might anticipate this inclination to be relatively stable, giving rise to a sequential selection of similar partners who then represent an individual’s “type”. We tested this idea by examining whether people’s sequential partners resembled each other at the level of eye color. We gathered details of the eye colors of the partners of participants (N = 579) across their adult romantic history (N = 3250 relationships), in three samples, comprising two samples which made use of self-reports from predominantly UK-based participants, and one which made use of publicly available information about celebrity relationship histories. Recorded partner eye colors comprised black (N = 39 partners), dark brown (N = 884), light brown (N = 393), hazel (N = 224), blue (N = 936), blue green (N = 245), grey (N = 34), and green (N = 229). We calculated the proportion of identical eye colors within each participant’s relationship history, and compared that to 100,000 random permutations of our dataset, using t-tests to investigate if the eye color of partners across an individual’s relationship history was biased relative to chance (i.e., if there was greater consistency, represented by higher calculated proportions of identical eye colors, in the original dataset than in the permutations). To account for possible eye color reporting errors and ethnic group matching, we ran the analyses restricted to White participants and to high-confidence eye color data; we then ran the analyses again in relation to the complete dataset. We found some limited evidence for some consistency of eye color across people’s relationship histories in some of the samples only when using the complete dataset. We discuss the issues of small effect sizes, partner-report bias, and ethnic group matching in investigating partner consistency across time.
... However, human kin detection may rely primarily on heuristics such a coresidence or shared perinatal association, which only signal close kinship [226]. A candidate mechanism for more distant kin detection in optimal outbreeding is positive sexual imprinting (see [208,227] for discussion), whereby offspring develop a mating template from relatives (or non-relatives [228]) in the developmental environment. Humans may exhibit a positive imprinting-like behaviour (ILB) [105,[229][230][231][232], with some studies suggesting that people's mates resemble their opposite-sex parents, especially with respect to facial traits [103,228,233]. ...
... A candidate mechanism for more distant kin detection in optimal outbreeding is positive sexual imprinting (see [208,227] for discussion), whereby offspring develop a mating template from relatives (or non-relatives [228]) in the developmental environment. Humans may exhibit a positive imprinting-like behaviour (ILB) [105,[229][230][231][232], with some studies suggesting that people's mates resemble their opposite-sex parents, especially with respect to facial traits [103,228,233]. However, both the existence and function of ILB in humans are contested [226,234]. ...
Full-text available
Humans often mate with those resembling themselves, a phenomenon described as positive assortative mating (PAM). The causes of this attract broad interest, but there is little agreement on the topic. This may be because empirical studies and reviews sometimes focus on just a few explanations, often based on disciplinary conventions. This review presents an interdisciplinary conceptual framework on the causes of PAM in humans, drawing on human and non-human biology, the social sciences, and the humanities. Viewing causality holistically, we first discuss the proximate causes (i.e. the ‘how’) of PAM, considering three mechanisms: stratification, convergence and mate choice. We also outline methods to control for confounders when studying mate choice. We then discuss ultimate explanations (i.e. ‘the why’) for PAM, including adaptive and non-adaptive processes. We conclude by suggesting a focus on interdisciplinarity in future research.
... Proximate explanations for specific partner preferences can involve an ontogenetic perspective, whereby an individual's experience over the developmental life course is taken into account (Bereczkei et al., 2004;Fawcett & Bleay, 2009;Hasenkamp et al., 2005;Little et al., 2003;Marcinkowska & Rantala, 2012;Scheller et al., 2021), and a mechanistic perspective, which is concerned with the physiological and psychological factors mediating the expression of the behavior or preference (e.g., Adkins- Regan, 1998;Gildersleeve et al., 2014;Havlíček & Roberts, 2009). While most research in the domain of mate choice has focussed on the explanatory power of genetic determinants or pre-natal, hormonal exposure on brain development guiding partner preferences (Balthazart, 2011(Balthazart, , 2016Bien et al., 2012;Bogaert & Skorska, 2020;Y. ...
Full-text available
Sex differences in mate preferences are ubiquitous, having been evidenced across generations and cultures. Their prevalence and persistence have compellingly placed them in the evolutionarily adaptive context of sexual selection. However, the psycho-biological mechanisms contributing to their generation and maintenance remain poorly understood. As such a mechanism, sexual attraction is assumed to guide interest, desire, and the affinity toward specific partner features. However, whether sexual attraction can indeed explain sex differences in partner preferences has not been explicitly tested. To better understand how sex and sexual attraction shape mate preferences in humans we assessed how partner preferences differed across the spectrum of sexual attraction in a sample of 479 individuals that identified as asexual, gray-sexual, demisexual or allosexual. We further tested whether romantic attraction predicted preference profiles better than sexual attraction. Our results show that sexual attraction accounts for highly replicable sex differences in mate preferences for high social status and financial prospects, conscientiousness, and intelligence; however, it does not account for the enhanced preference for physical attractiveness expressed by men, which persists even in individuals with low sexual attraction. Instead, sex differences in physical attractiveness preference are better explained by the degree of romantic attraction. Furthermore, effects of sexual attraction on sex differences in partner preferences were grounded in current rather than previous experiences of sexual attraction. Taken together, the results support the idea that contemporary sex differences in partner preferences are maintained by several psycho-biological mechanisms that evolved in conjunction, including not only sexual but also romantic attraction.
... However, later experimental studies provided support to the Oedipus complex idea: for example, it turned out that, statistically, a person's wife is more similar in appearance to the person's mother than an average woman from his region; see, e.g., [1,7,8]. ...
Sigmund Freud famously placed what he called Oedipus complex at the center of his explanation of psychological and psychiatric problems. Freund’s analysis was based on anecdotal evidence and intuition, not on solid experiments—as a result, for a long time, many psychologists dismissed the universality of Freud’s findings. However, lately, experiments seem to confirm that indeed men, on average, select wives who resemble their mothers, and women select husbands who resemble their fathers. In this paper, we provide a possible biological explanation for this observational phenomenon.
... Even more intriguingly, through cross-fostering, male and female goats and sheep were able to develop cross-species partner preferences (Kendrick et al., 1998). Notable evidence has also been observed for sexual imprinting in humans (Bereczkei et al., 2004), albeit with more subtle effects relative to those reported in animal studies. ...
Full-text available
Is sexual orientation an evolutionary adaptation or social construct? With respect to sexual preferences, to what extent are we “born that way” and to what extent does learning matter? This chapter discusses how nature and nurture may interact to shape sexual motivation by reviewing existing literature on sexual preferences and orientations, as well as by considering sex/gender differences in erotic plasticity, sexual fluidity, and the specificity of sexual arousal. We describe how these phenomena might be accounted for by processes in which mind-body feedback loops amplify some sexual responses over others on multiple levels, which we refer to as the Reward Competition Feedback (RCF) model. With respect to sex/gender differences, we describe how these positive feedback processes might be amplified in men compared with women, potentially substantially driven by differences in the constraints and affordances of female and male anatomy. More specifically, we argue that the well-known female-male difference in the concordance of genital and subjective arousal may contribute to well-known differences in sexual specificity and plasticity/fluidity. We further provide convergent support for RCF by reviewing preexisting theories of sexual learning. Finally, we consider some of the ethical implications of models in which sexual orientation might be shaped by experiences over the course of development.KeywordsSexual preferenceSexual orientationSexGenderDevelopmentLearning
This chapter “Models and Typologies of Love” suggests the integrative typological approach to the studies of love. It defines the concepts of models and types and specified their varieties. Among those are scientific, personal, and cultural models of love, the ideal models of love, what people think about love, and real models of love – how they really experience love. In this chapter I propose methodological strategies and specific methods of categorization for the construction of individual and cultural typologies. Methods of categorization include the selection of specific representations of categories, implementation of the data transformation, and techniques of statistical analyses. Personal and cultural models and typologies of love are presented as illustrative example.KeywordsDefinitions of loveConstruction of loveModels of lovePersonal models of loveCultural models of loveTypologies of loveTypological models of loveCultural factors of loveCultural values
Gender differences in experience of first intercourse are among the largest in sexuality research, with women recalling less pleasure and satisfaction than men. This "enjoyment gap" has not been considered in explanations of gender differences in sexual desire. Yet, reinforcement and incentive learning features prominently in recent models of women's sexual desire, and nonhuman animal models demonstrate their impact at sexual debut. We examined whether women's lower sexual desire is explained by their gender or by gendered experience of enjoyment at sexual debut. Emerging adults (N = 838) provided retrospective accounts of physical (orgasm) and affective (satisfaction) enjoyment at (hetero)sexual debut. We replicated gender differences across behavioral, general, and multidimensional measures of trait sexual desire; however, they were contingent on experience and measurement method. When its cognitive multidimensional properties were appreciated, women's sexual desire varied with experience of orgasm at sexual debut and diverged from men's only when orgasm did not occur. Such effects were not observed for satisfaction, nor for men. Nor did effects of a control event - masturbatory debut - extend beyond solitary sexual desire. Findings underscore the importance of orgasm equality, and suggest its absence at sexual debut may play an unacknowledged role in differentiating sexual desire.
The aim of this report is to present the research project „Effect of parental characteristics on mate choice“ supported by the Czech Science Foundation (GA18–15168S). It is a multidisciplinary project involving not only psychological but also biological and chemical methods, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the studied phenomenon. The main aim of the project is to investigate whether people choose mates similar to their opposite-sex parents in the face, body odor, voice, temperament, and personality.
Sociobiologists and evolutionary psychologists emphasise that mate choice is based on Darwinian natural selection for individual fitness. This chapter refers to this as the individual imperative. These multiple features of the environment that determine individual success or failure the chapter refers as the collective imperative. In addition, the chapter discusses the assortative mating of couples and touches on the complex interactions between individual mate selection and human social ecology. It presents the genetic argument for human mate assortment then refers to experimental data, suggesting that the social perceptions of couples by others influence the mate assortment process. This social-preceptual influence extends to incestual relations where mate assortment is extreme. Finally, the chapter generalises the findings to a more formal theory of individual and social influences on human mate selection.
Research has shown that human partners are more similar than expected by chance on a variety of traits. Studies examining hair and eye colour show some evidence of positive assortment. Positive assortment may reflect attraction to self-similar characteristics but is also consistent with attraction to parental traits. Here, we examine self-reported partner hair and eye colour and the influence that own and parental colour characteristics have on these variables. Parental characteristics were found to correlate positively with actual partner characteristics for both men and women. Regression analysis predicting partner characteristics from maternal and paternal traits (which controls for own traits) revealed the greater importance of the opposite-sex parent over the same-sex parent in predicting both hair and eye colour of actual partners. The findings may reflect an influence of parental colour characteristics on human partner choice. Attraction to opposite-sex parental characteristics is seen in a wide variety of animals where it is usually attributed to imprinting processes in infancy. Although the mechanism is unclear and not necessarily confined to infancy, the data reported here are consistent with a somewhat analogous process to imprinting occurring in humans.
This study, based on questionnaires given to 732 subjects, uses an integrative approach with a focus on evolutionary (life-history) explanations. In accordance with Belsky, Steinberg, and Draper’s theoretical model of socialisation (1991), we claim that experiences during childhood trigger variations in the life cycle and shift developmental trajectories as adaptive answers to different environmental conditions. Unfavourable family conditions constitute an unpredictable and unstable environment that make children susceptible to adopting opportunistic mating strategies rather than parenting strategies. Based on Chisholm’s statement (1993) that high stress in the family provides cues for local death rates, we argue that mortality rates may have a significant effect on reproductive decisions, even in post-industrial societies. We report that length of schooling, date of the ” rst marriage, and fertility were associated with the subjects’ family conditions, such as parental affirmation, emotional atmosphere, parent-subject conflicts, and parental relations. Women growing up in unfavourable family circumstances ”nish schooling and marry earlier, and this shift in developmental trajectory is likely to lead to the higher number of children measured among these women. Men, on the other hand, do not show such a difference in reproductive output, which may be due to their increased involvement in sexual competition. Remarkably, significant correlation has been found between life-history strategy and mortality rates; those coming from unfavourable environments have more deceased sisters and brothers than others. It is possible that individual differences in mating and parenting behaviour are still contingent, among others, on local death rates.
The social preferences of captive, juvenile golden-mantled ground squirrels,Spermophilus lateralis, were studied as a first step towards explaining the development of kin-differential behaviour, which occurs frequently in the genusSpermophilus. There groups of young (four litters/group) were reared in the laboratory and then transferred as juveniles at about 36 days of age to an outdoor, semi-natural environment in which social interactions between juveniles were recorded. In group 1, littermates (young born to a common dam) were reared together until behavioural observations began. In groups 2 and 3, pups were cross-fostered between dams shortly after birth to examine how rearing (together or apart) and relatedness (littermates or non-littermates) affected juveniles' social interactions in the semi-natural environment. Social interactions were recorded for a 9-14-day period beginning when juveniles reached about 37 days of age, which coincides with when they would come above ground for the first time in nature. In all three groups, juveniles' social preferences were manifested most clearly in social play. In group 1, littermates (reared together) played together about twice as often as non-littermates (reared apart) on a per pair basis, which suggests that a shared rearing environment influenced the development of social preferences. In groups 2 and 3 in which pups had been cross-fostered, play-bout frequencies were ordered (high to low): littermates reared together>non-littermates reared together>littermates reared apart>non-littermates reared apart, and statistical analysis revealed that both rearing and relatedness contributed to this ordering. The sex of a pair also affected play-bout frequencies (M-M>M-F>F-F) independently of rearing and relatedness. Results fromS. lateralisare compared with studies on other congeners, including parallel work onS. beldingi, in an effort to link interspecific differences in ecology and social organization to differences in the developmental systems that underlie the extent of kin favouritism in ground squirrels.