ArticlePDF Available

Unstimulated salivary flow rate, pH and buffer capacity of saliva in healthy volunteers

Authors:

Abstract

To assess the salivary flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity of healthy volunteers, and their relationships with age, gender, obesity, smoking, and alcohol consumption, and to establish the lower-end value of normal salivary flow (oligosialia). A prospective study was conducted in 159 healthy volunteers (age > 18 years, absence of medical conditions that could decrease salivary flow). Unstimulated whole saliva was collected during ten minutes, and salivary flow rate (ml/min), pH, and bicarbonate concentration (mmol/l) were measured using a Radiometer ABL 520. The 5 percentile of salivary flow rate and bicarbonate concentration was considered the lower limit of normality. Median salivary flow rate was 0.48 ml/min (range: 0.1-2 ml/min). Age younger than 44 years was associated with higher flow rates (OR 2.10). Compared with women, men presented a higher flow rate (OR 3.19) and buffer capacity (OR 2.81). Bicarbonate concentration correlated with salivary flow rate. The lower-end values of normal flow rate and bicarbonate concentration were 0.15 ml/min and 1.800 mmol/l, respectively. The presence of obesity, smoking, and alcohol consumption did not influence salivary parameters. In healthy volunteers, salivary flow rate depends on age and gender, and correlates with buffer capacity. Obesity, smoking, and alcohol use do not influence salivary secretion.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: to assess the salivary flow rate, pH, and buffer ca-
pacity of healthy volunteers, and their relationships with age, gen-
der, obesity, smoking, and alcohol consumption, and to establish
the lower-end value of normal salivary flow (oligosialia).
Methods: a prospective study was conducted in 159 healthy
volunteers (age > 18 years, absence of medical conditions that
could decrease salivary flow). Unstimulated whole saliva was collect-
ed during ten minutes, and salivary flow rate (ml/min), pH, and bi-
carbonate concentration (mmol/l) were measured using a Radiome-
ter ABL 520. The 5 percentile of salivary flow rate and bicarbonate
concentration was considered the lower limit of normality.
Results: median salivary flow rate was 0.48 ml/min (range:
0.1-2 ml/min). Age younger than 44 years was associated with
higher flow rates (OR 2.10). Compared with women, men present-
ed a higher flow rate (OR 3.19) and buffer capacity (OR 2.81). Bi-
carbonate concentration correlated with salivary flow rate. The
lower-end values of normal flow rate and bicarbonate concentra-
tion were 0.15 ml/min and 1.800 mmol/l, respectively. The pres
-
ence of obesity, smoking, and alcohol consumption did not influ-
ence salivary parameters.
Conclusions: in healthy volunteers, salivary flow rate depends
on age and gender, and correlates with buffer capacity. Obesity,
smoking, and alcohol use do not influence salivary secretion.
Key words: Saliva. Salivary flow rate. Salivary buffer capacity.
Oligosialia.
Fenoll-Palomares C, Muñoz-Montagud JV, Sanchiz V, Her
-
reros B, Hernández V, Mínguez M, Benages A. Unstimulated
salivary flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity of saliva in healthy
volunteers. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2004; 96: 773-783.
INTRODUCTION
Saliva plays a critical role in oral homeostasis, as it
modulates the ecosystem within the oral cavity (1). Lu-
brication of the alimentary bolus, protection against
virus, bacteria and fungi, buffer capacity, protection and
repair of the oral mucosa, and dental remineralization are
some of the functions of saliva (2-4). Taking this into ac-
count, quantitative and/or qualitative alterations in sali-
vary secretion may lead to local (caries, oral mucositis,
candidiasis, oral infections, chewing disorders) or extra-
oral (dysphagia, halitosis, weight loss) adverse effects (5-
7).
Xerostomia or “dry mouth” is usually the clinical ex-
pression of decreased salivary secretion; however, it may
occur without a low salivary flow rate (8).
Xerostomia is a common condition (9) that leads pa-
tients to visit many specialist clinics (gastroentrologists,
dentists, internal medicine doctors), as it may develop in
many local and systemic diseases (Sjögren’s syndrome,
diabetes mellitus, drug exposures, radiation to the head or
neck) (10-13); nevertheless, in older patients xerostomia
may develop in the absence of any disease (14-15), which
may be explained by an ageing-related decrease in sali
-
vary secretion.
It has been suggested that ageing leads to a decrease in
salivary flow rate as a consequence of parenchymal atrophy
(16-21). Alternatively, some authors showed that healthy
old people had a normal salivary flow rate with a great
functional reserve, mainly in the parotid glands (22-26).
The buffer capacity of saliva is an important factor,
which plays a role in the maintenance of salivary pH,
and in dental remineralization. The buf
fer capacity of
saliva basically depends on bicarbonate concentration
(27); it correlates with salivary flow rate (28), as any
factor decreasing salivary flow rate tends to decrease its
buf
fer capacity and to increase the risk of caries devel
-
opment (29).
Unstimulated salivary flow rate, pH and buffer capacity of saliva
in healthy volunteers
C. Fenoll-Palomares, J. V. Muñoz-Montagud
1
, V. Sanchiz
2
, B. Herreros
2
, V. Hernández
2
, M. Mínguez
2
and
A. Benages
2
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria. Centro de Atención Primaria. Rafelbunyol, Valencia.
1
Centro de Especialidades.
Burjassot. Valencia.
2
Service of Gastroenterology. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Universitat de Valencia, Spain
1130-0108/2004/96/11/773-783
R
EVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS
Copyright © 2004
A
RÁN EDICIONES, S. L
.
REV ESP ENFERM DIG (Madrid)
Vol. 96. N.
° 11, pp. 773-783, 2004
Supported in part by a grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (03/02).
Recibido: 24-06-04.
Aceptado: 30-06-04.
Correspondencia: Adolfo Benages. Servicio de Gastroenterología. Hospital
Clínico Universitario. Avda. Blasco Ibañez, 17. 46010 Valencia. e-mail:
benages@uv.es
Other factors that may influence salivary flow rate and
the buffer capacity of saliva are gender, smoking status,
and alcohol consumption. Women show a lower salivary
flow rate (30-32) and decreased buffer capacity (29). The
relationship between salivary secretion and smoking or
alcohol consumption is controversial, as normal secretion
and the presence of hyposialia have both been reported
(33-37).
The aim of this study was to analyze unstimulated sali-
vary flow rate, salivary pH, and salivary buffer capacity
in a group of healthy subjects, as well as their relation-
ship with age and gender, together with other individual
factors (obesity, smoking status, alcohol consumption), in
order to establish normal ranges in the healthy population
in our area.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
An observational prospective study on healthy volun-
teers who signed an informed consent, from April 1998
to May 2000. Volunteers were included if they were older
than 18, did not suffer from acute or chronic diseases of
the oral mucosa or salivary glands, did not complain of
“oral dryness” or “oral burning”, did not suffer from
acute infectious diseases, systemic illness or cardiac, re-
nal, respiratory or hepatic failure, and had not received
therapeutic radiation to the head or neck region; women
were not to be pregnant or were using safe contraceptive
methods (except anovulatories). Volunteers were exclud-
ed from the study if they did not meet inclusion criteria or
did not sign an informed consent.
Every patient was explored by the same stomatologist
to rule out acute or chronic diseases of the oral mucosa or
salivary glands. Demographic features were collected
(age, gender
, height, and weight), as well as smoking sta
-
tus and alcohol consumption. In each patient the body
mass index was determined, and if greater than 30 the
subject was considered obese (38). The subject was con-
sidered a smoker if he smoked, regardless of the number
of cigarettes, and an alcohol consumer if alcohol intake
was greater than 60 g/day in men or 40 g/day in women.
Study of salivar
y secr
etion
The study of salivary secretion was performed without
any stimulus in the morning (9 to 11 a.m.), under stan-
dard temperature and humidity conditions. All subjects
refrained from eating, drinking or smoking for a mini-
mum of 2 h before saliva collection.
Subjects were comfortably seated and, after a few
minutes of relaxation, they were trained to avoid swal-
lowing saliva and asked to lean forward and spit all the
saliva they produced for 10 minutes into a graduated test
tube, through a glass funnel. The whole volume collected
for 10 minutes was then measured.
To determine salivary pH and bicarbonate concentration,
an analyzer Radiometer ABL 250 was used. To diminish
the error probability, each sample was analyzed three times,
and the mean value was assumed to be the real one.
We analyzed the following variables of salivary secre-
tion: salivary flow rate (ml/min), macroscopic appear-
ance (transparent, turbid or bloody), pH, and buffer ca-
pacity expressed as bicarbonate concentration (mmol/l).
Statistical study
A descriptive analysis of variables was performed. To
assess the normal distribution of quantitative variables, a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used. Variables with a nor-
mal distribution were compared using Student’s t test or an
ANOVA test (when comparing more than two groups).
Non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis)
were used to compare variables without a normal distribu-
tion. To assess the correlation between quantitative vari-
ables, Pearson’s coefficient was used. A Chi-square test
was used to compare qualitative variables. Variables which
obtained a p value less than 0.1 were included in a multi-
variate analysis (logistic regression, step forward method).
Statistical significance was assumed if p < 0.05. The statis-
tical analysis was performed with an SPSS 11.5 pack for
Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).
RESULTS
Subjects
One hundred and fifty-nine patients made up the study
group (52 males, 107 females) (Table I). Age was similar
for both men and women (p = 0.796); obese people were
younger than non-obese individuals (31.94
± 9.64
vs
45.52 ± 14.03 years, p < 0.001); smokers were younger
than non-smokers (36.85 ± 11.75
vs 46.69 ± 14.18 years,
p < 0.001); subjects who did not drink alcohol were older
than those with alcohol consumption (45.46 ± 14.56
vs
36.83
± 9.54 years, p = 0.001).
Salivar
y flow rate, pH and buf
fer capacity of saliva
Features of saliva are shown in table I. Unstimulated
salivary flow rate does not present a normal distribution.
According to Navazesh (39), who defined hyposialia
(basal flow rate equal or less than 0.16 ml/min), only
eight subjects (5.03%) were under this level; these sub-
jects, compared with those with a normal flow rate, have
a lower pH (6.5390 ± 0.3605
vs 6.8036 ± 0.2782, p =
0.01
1) and a lower bicarbonate concentration (3.5625
±
3.0654 mmol/l
vs 5.8611 ± 2.7248 mmol/l, p = 0.022). In
the subjects with hyposialia, the aspect of saliva was
more frequently turbid (6/8 subjects).
774 C. FENOLL-PALOMARES ET AL.
R
EV ESP ENFERM DIG (Madrid)
REV ESP ENFERM DIG 2004; 96(11): 773-783
A significant positive correlation was found between
salivary flow rate, pH, and bicarbonate concentration (r =
0.322, p < 0.001, and r = 0.425, p < 0.001, respectively),
and between pH and bicarbonate concentration (r =
0.736, p = 0.001).
Relationship between salivary parameters and
demographic variables
Men showed a greater flow rate than women (median
0.57 ml/min, range 0.15-2
vs 0.42 ml/min, range 0.10-2,
p < 0.001). Between men and women no differences were
found in salivary pH (6.8400 ± 0.3199 in men
vs 6.7661
± 0.2686 in women, p = 0.128), but men’s buffer capacity
was higher (6.626 ± 3.1239 mmol/l
vs 5.3171 ± 2.4989
mmol/l, p = 0.010).
To analyze the role of age, percentiles 25 and 75 were
determined (32 and 54 years, respectively). We found that
older patients presented a significant lower salivary flow
rate (Table II), but no differences were found in pH or
buffer capacity between these three age groups (Table III).
Age correlated significantly with flow rate (r = -0.222, p =
0.005), but not with pH (r = -0.106, p = 0.185) or bicar-
bonate concentration (r = -0.030, p = 0.710).
Salivary variables in obese subjects, smokers or alco-
hol consumers did not differ from those in non-obese,
non-smoking or non-alcohol consuming volunteers (Ta-
bles II and IV).
Vol. 96. N.
° 11, 2004 UNSTIMULATED SALIVARY FLOW RATE, pH AND BUFFER CAPACITY
775
OF SALIVA IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS
REV ESP ENFERM DIG 2004; 96(11): 773-783
Table I. Characteristics of the study group
Demographic variables
Subjects
159 healthy volunteers; mean age 44.16
± 14.23 years (range 18-75)
Gender 52 men (44.58 ± 13.15 years) and 107
women (43.95 ± 14.78 years)
Obese 17 subjects (10.69%)
Smokers 41 subjects (25.78%)
Alcohol consumers 24 subjects (15.09%)
Salivary variables
Salivary flow rate Median 0.48 ml/min (range 0.10-2). Per-
centile 5 = 0.15 ml/min
pH 6.7903 ± 0.2874 (range 5.8590-7.5400)
Bicarbonate concentration 5.7455 ± 2.7783 mmol/l (range 0.3000-
13.2000)
Percentile 5 = 1.800 mmol/l
Macroscopic appearance Transparent in 88 subjects (55.3%)
Turbid in 61 subjects (38.3%)
Blody in 10 subjects (6.3%)
Table II. Salivary flow rate according to age, obesity, smok-
ing status and alcohol consumption
Salivary flow rate (ml/min)
Percentile Percentile Percentile Range p
25 50 75
Age
A (41) 0.39 0.54 0.74 0.15-2
B (81) 0.35 0.52 0.72 0.10-2
0.046
C (37) 0.21 0.40 0.62 0.10-1.6
Obesity
Yes (17) 0.35 0.48 0.63 0.20-1.10
0.969
No (142) 0.32 0.48 0.70 0.10-2
Smoking
Yes (41) 0.40 0.52 0.76 0.18-2
0.147
No (118) 0.31 0.45 0.70 0.10-2
Alcohol consumption
Yes (24) 0.40 0.46 0.59 0.20-1.80
0.933
No (135) 0.32 0.52 0.72 0.10-2
Age: group A (under percentile 25): 18-32 years; group B (percentile 25 to 75):
33-54 years; and group C (over percentile 75): 55-75 years (Kruskal-Wallis test).
Obesity, smoking status, and alcohol consumption were analyzed using the
Mann-Whitney U test. Parenthesis: number of subjects in each group.
Table III. Salivary variables (pH and buffer capacity) accor-
ding to age (ANOVA)
pH
Group A 6.8127 ± 0.2434
Group B 6.8085 ± 0.2710
Group C 6.7254 ± 0.3578
P 0.294
Bicarbonate concentration (mmol/l)
Group A 5.4853 ± 2.3173
Group B
6.1101
± 2.7575
Group C 5.2356 ± 3.2204
p 0.224
Age: group A (under percentile 25): 18-32 years (41); group B (percentile 25 to
75): 33-54 years (81); and group C (over percentile 75): 55-75 years (37).
Table IV. Men values of salivary variables (pH and buffer ca
-
pacity) according to qualitative variable in the study group
(Studen’s t test)
pH Bicarbonate (mmol/l)
Obesity
Yes
6.7482
± 0.2698 5.7176 ± 2.5812
No 6.7953 ± 0.2900 5.7488 ± 2.8096
p
0.525
0.965
Smoking
Yes 6.7359 ± 0.2716 5.2248 ± 2.2781
No 6.8092 ± 0.2915 5.9264 ± 2.9193
p
0.160
0.119
Alcohol consumption
Yes 6.7554 ± 0.2991 5.5041 ± 2.6435
No 6.7965 ± 0.2860 5.7884 ± 2.8089
p 0.521 0.646
Univariate analysis
To study salivary variables with respect to qualitative
variables and age (younger or older than the median age),
they were classified into two categories (lower or greater
than the median value). Table V shows the results of this
analysis.
The variable “
hyposialia” (defined according to
Navazesh) (39), has not been analyzed, as it was present in
only 8/159 volunteers (5.03%); but it is worth noting that 6
of them were women, 7 of them were older than 44, and
none of them was obese, a smoker or an alcohol consumer.
Multivariate analysis
Salivary flow rate above the median value was associat-
ed with younger age (< 44 years) (OR 2.10, CI95% 1.08-
4.05, p = 0.027) and male gender (OR 3.19, CI95% 1.56-
6.50, p = 0.001). Women showed a pH under the median
value (OR 2.13, CI95% 1.081-4.207, p = 0.029), whereas
in men bicarbonate concentration tended to be above me-
dian values (OR 2.81, CI95% 1.39-5.67, p = 0.004).
DISCUSSION
Nowadays, to offer better health care to people a trend
is seen towards integrating medical and odontological
knowledge (40); hence, gastroenterologists should learn
about salivary disorders, as saliva is the initial responsi-
ble of the digestive process. On the other hand, the
longevity of population, novel therapeutic techniques and
increased drug usage may affect oral structures, including
salivary glands, which could favor the development of lo-
cal diseases or extra-oral disorders.
Measurement of salivary secretion can be accomplished
by different methods: a) resting or unstimulated whole sali-
va secretion; b) stimulated whole saliva secretion; and c)
glandular saliva collection (mainly from parotid glands)
with or without stimulation. Unstimulated whole saliva re-
flects basal salivary flow rate, is present in our mouths for
about 14 hours a day, and is the secretion that provides pro-
tection to oral tissues. Stimulated saliva represents the se-
cretion during food intake (physiologic stimulation), and is
present in our mouths for up to 2 hours (3). So, the study of
unstimulated salivary secretion is an accurate method to an-
alyze salivary gland status, while stimulated saliva is useful
for the study of the functional reserve. In our study we have
chosen to measure unstimulated saliva, as it is an easy, non-
invasive and comfortable procedure, which favors its use in
population studies.
Age influences salivary secretion, probably due to the
physiologic process of ageing (16-21). Our results con-
firm this aspect, as we observed than older age is associ-
ated with decreased non-stimulated salivary flow rate (r =
-0.222, p = 0.005), while in younger people (< 44 years)
flow rate is greater than in people older than 44 years
(OR 2.10).
According to our data, salivary flow is greater in men
than in women (OR 3.19); this finding is not related to
age, as both groups (men and women) did not show dif-
ferences in this variable. Similar results are shown in other
studies (30-32), and it is suggested that these differences
776 C. FENOLL-PALOMARES ET AL.
R
EV ESP ENFERM DIG (Madrid)
REV ESP ENFERM DIG 2004; 96(11): 773-783
Table V. Univariate analysis between salivary variables (classified into two groups according to median value) and qualitative
variables (Chi-square test)
Flow rate (ml/min) pH Bicarbonate (mmol/l)
< 0.48
> 0.48 < 6.8310 > 6.8310 < 5.3000 > 5.3000
Gender
Male 17 35 20 32 18 34
Female 64 43 61 46 63 44
p
0.001 0.028 0.004
Age
< 44 y. 34 46 38 42 39 41
> 44 y. 47 32 43 36 42 37
p
0.032 0.382 0.578
Obesity
Yes
9
8
11
6
9
8
No 72 70 70 72 72 70
p 0.862 0.230 0.862
Smoking
Yes 19 22 21 20 26 15
No
62
56
60 58 55 63
p 0.494 0.967 0.064
Alcohol consumption
Yes
15
9
10
14
13
11
No
66
69 71 64 68 67
p 0.219 0.324 0.732
may be explained by salivary gland size, which is smaller
in women (41). Decreased salivary secretion in women
may be related to the greater frequency or “oral dryness”
seen in females (3).
Data about the influence of age in the literature are
controversial, and this could be a consequence of some
methodological biases: variability in age groups, collec-
tion of unstimulated and/or stimulated saliva, inclusion of
medicated subjects, etc. (30).
Our data on the buffer capacity of saliva agree with
those published in other studies (27-29), as we found a
positive correlation with flow rate and a lower bicarbon-
ate concentration in women. From our series, we may
consider that there is a decreased buffer capacity when
bicarbonate concentration is lower than 1,800 mmol/l
(percentile 5).
It has been postulated that juvenile obesity is a risk
factor of oral disorders (42), caries among them (43); the
work of Power et al. (44) did not show any differences in
salivation patterns between obese and non-obese sub-
jects, while other authors found that in young obese peo-
ple salivary secretion was higher than in the control
group (45). Smoking increases salivary flow in the short
term (46), but in long-term smokers no differences have
been shown
versus non-smokers in flow rate (47,48); it
has been reported a decrease of pH (47) and buffer capac-
ity (49) in smokers, but normal values of both parameters
have also been described (48,50). Acute intake of alco-
holic drinks decreases salivary secretion (37); however,
in chronic alcoholism, with or without hepatic disorder,
data are controversial, as a decrease in salivary flow has
been reported (34,51), as well as a normal (35) or in-
creased flow (52).
In our study, obesity, smoking, and alcohol consump-
tion do not imply alterations on salivary features (flow
and buf
fer capacity); however
, we cannot draw firm con-
clusions due to the low number of subjects with these
conditions.
Reduction of salivary flow has been related to a sensa-
tion of “
dr
y mouth
”; despite frequent complaints about
this symptom and the impairment in quality of life that it
involves, it has only been trivially studied in clinical
practice (11,53). Xerostomia is mainly related to drug in-
gestion (anticholiner
gics, sympatheticomimetics, drugs
acting on serotonin or noradrenalin receptors, etc.) (54),
therapeutic radiation of the head and neck, and autoim-
mune diseases such as Sjögren’s syndrome. In a study of
100 patients older than 60 years who complained of xe-
rostomia, the most prevalent etiology was Sjögren’
s syn-
drome, followed by iatrogenic xerostomia and idiopathic
xerostomia; the authors found hyposialia (unstimulated
flow rate < 0.2 ml/min) in 65% of patients (55).
The diagnostic of hyposialia can be established accord-
ing to flow rate, but no consensus has been reached re
-
garding cut-off values, which makes it difficult to com-
pare studies of salivary secretion and “dry mouth”. In our
series, we considered hyposialia if salivary flow was low-
er than percentile 5 (0.15 ml/min), which is similar to the
value found by Navazesh (0,16 ml/min) (8); in the litera-
ture, values to define hyposialia vary from 0.10 (56) to
0.20 ml/min (55). In our series, four healthy volunteers
had hyposialia without a sensation of “
dry mouth” (2.5%);
all of them were women older than the median age, non-
obese, non-smokers, and who did not consume alcohol.
To evaluate our results about the flow rate and buffer
capacity of saliva in healthy subjects, and to demonstrate
its diagnostic usefulness (especially the cut-off value to
define hyposialia), it would be necessary that patients di-
agnosed with xerostomia be studied.
REFERENCES
1. Atkinson JC, Baum BJ. Salivary enhancement: current status and fu-
ture therapies. J Dent Edu 2001; 105: 1096-101.
2. Mandel ID. The role of saliva in maintaining oral homeostasis. J Am
Dent Assoc 1989; 119: 298-304.
3. Sreebny CM. Saliva in health and disease: an appraisal and update.
Int Dent J 2000; 50: 140-61.
4. Sonies BC, Ship JA, Baum BJ. Relationship between saliva produc-
tion and oropharyngeal swallow in healthy, different-aged adults.
Dysphagia 1989; 4: 85-9.
5. Atkinson JC, Wu A. Salivary gland dysfunction: causes, symptoms,
treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125: 409-16.
6. Ship JA, Pillemer SR, Baum BJ. Xerostomia and the geriatric patient.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 535-43.
7. Valdez IH, Fox PC. Interactions of the salivary and gastrointestinal
systems. II. Effects of salivary dysfunction on the gastrointestinal
tract. Dig Dis 1991; 9: 210-8.
8. Navazesh M. Dry mouth: aging and oral health. Compend Contn
Educ Dent 2002; 23 (Supl. 10): 41-8.
9. Sreebny LM, Valdini A. Xerostomia. Part I. Relationship to other oral
symptoms and salivary gland hypofunction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol 1998; 68: 451-8.
10. Daniels TE. Evaluation, differential diagnosis, and treatment of xe-
rostomia. J Rheumatol Suppl 2000; 61: 6-10.
11. Sreebny LM, Valdini A. Xerostomia. A neglected symptom. Arch In-
tern Med 1987; 147: 1333-7.
12. Guggenheimer J, Moore PA. Xerostomia: etiology, recognition and
treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 61-9.
13. Porter SR, Scully C, Hegarty AM. An update of the etiology and
management of xerostomia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra-
diol Endod 2004; 97: 28-46.
14. Bivona PL. Xerostomia. A common problem among the elderly. NY
State Dent J 1998; 64: 46-52.
15. Astor FC, Hanft KL, Ciocon JO. Xerostomia: a prevalent condition in
the elderly. Ear Nose Throat J 1999; 78: 476-9.
16.
Tanida T, Ueta E, Tobiume A, Hamada T, Rao F, Osaki T. Influence
of aging on candidal growth and adhesion regulatory agents in saliva.
J Oral Pathol Med 2001; 30: 328-35.
17.
Yeh CK, Johnson DA, Dodds MW, Sakai S, Rugh JD, Hatch JP. As
-
sociation of salivary flow rates with maximal bite force. J Dent Res
2000; 79: 1560-5.
18.
Yeh CK, Johnson DA, Dodds MW. Impact of aging on human sali
-
vary gland function: a community-based study. Aging (Milano) 1998;
10: 421-8.
19.
Lopez Jornet MP, Bermejo Fenoll A. Is there an age-dependent de
-
crease in resting secretion of saliva of healthy persons?. A study of
1493 subjects. Braz Dent J 1994; 5: 93-8.
20.
Narhi TO, Kurki N, Ainamo A. Saliva, salivary micro-organisms, and
oral health in the home-dwelling old elderly-a five-year longitudinal
study. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 1640-6.
21. Bergdahl M, Bergdahl J. Low unstimulated salivary flow and subjetive
oral dryness: association with medication, anxiety, depression, and
stress. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1652-8.
Vol. 96. N.
° 11, 2004 UNSTIMULATED SALIVARY FLOW RATE, pH AND BUFFER CAPACITY
777
OF SALIVA IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS
REV ESP ENFERM DIG 2004; 96(11): 773-783
22. Tylenda CA, Ship JA, Fox PC, Baum BJ. Evaluation of submandibu-
lar salivary flow rate in different age groups. J Dent Res 1988; 67:
1225-8.
23. Baum BJ. Salivary gland fluid secretion during aging. J Am Geriatr
Soc 1989; 37: 453-8.
24. Navazesh M. Salivary gland hypofunction in elderly patients. J Calif
Dent Assoc 1994; 22: 62-8.
25. Fischer D, Ship JA. Effect of age on variability of parotid salivary
gland flow rates over time. Age Ageing 1999; 28: 557-61.
26. Ship JA, Nolan NE, Puckett SA. Longitudinal analysis of parotid and
submandibular salivary flow rates in healthy, different-aged adults. J
Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995; 50: 285-9.
27. Bardow A, Moe D, Nyvad B, Nauntofte B. The buffer capacity and
buffer systems of human whole saliva measured without loss of CO2.
Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45: 1-12.
28. Wikner S, Söder P-Ö. Factors associated with salivary buffering ca-
pacity in young adults in Stockholm, Sweden. Scand J Dent Res
1994; 102: 50-3.
29. Heintze U, Birkhed D, Björn H. Secretion rate and buffer of resting
and stimuled whole saliva as a function of age an sex. Swed Dentr
1983; 7: 227-38.
30. Percival RS, Challcombe SJ, Marsh PD. Flow rates of resting whole
and stimulated parotid saliva in relation to age and gender. J Dent Res
1994; 73: 1416-20.
31. Mazengo MC, Söderling, Alakuijala P, Tiekso J, Tenovuo J, Simell
O, et al. Flow rate and composition of whole saliva in rural and urban
Tanzania with special reference to diet, age, and gender. Caries Res
1994; 28: 468-76.
32. Ikebe K, Sajima H, Kobayashi S, Hata K, Morii K, Nokubi T, et al.
Association of salivary flow rate with oral function in a sample of
community-dwelling older adults in Japan. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 184-90.
33. Scott J, Woods K, Baxter P. Salivary flow rate, protein and electrolyte
concentrations in chronic alcoholic patients. J Biol Buccale 1988; 16:
215-8.
34. Dutta SK, Dukehart M, Narang A, Latham PS. Functional and struc-
tural changes in parotid glands of alcoholic cirrhotic patients. Gas-
troenterology 1989; 96: 510-8.
35. Bagan JV, Alapont L, Sanz C, del Olmo JA, Morcillo E, Cortijo J, et
al. Alteraciones dentales y salivales en los pacientes con cirrosis hep-
ática: estudio de 100 casos. Med Clin (Barc) 1998; 111: 125-8.
36. Jhonson NW, Bain CA, and EU-Working Group on Tobacco and Oral
Health. Tobacco and oral disease. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 200-6.
37. Enberg N, Alho H, Loimaranta V, Lenander-Lumikari M. Saliva flow
rate, amylase activity, and protein and electrolyte concentrations in
saliva after acute alcohol consumption. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92: 292-8.
38. Quiles Izquierdo J, Vioque J. Prevalencia de obesidad en la Comu-
nidad Valenciana. Med Clin (Barc) 1996; 106: 529-33.
39. Navazesh M, Christensen C, Brightman V. Clinical criteria for the di-
agnosis of salivary gland hypofunction. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1363-9.
40. Perrier M. Dental medicine and medicine. Rev Med Suisse Romande
2002; 122: 495-8.
41. Scott J. Age, sex and contralateral differences in the volumes of hu-
man submandibular salivary glands. Arch Oral Biol 1975: 20: 885-7.
42. Al-Khalili B, Norgren S, Marcus C, Dahllöf G. Correlation between
oral health and percentage overweight in children with severe obesity.
J Dent Res 2000; 79: Special Issue: 315.
43. Tuomi T. Pilot study on obesity in caries prediction. Community Dent
Oral Epidemiol 1989; 17: 289-91.
44. Powers PS, Holland P, Miller C, Powers HP. Salivation patterns of
obese and normal subjects. Int J Obes 1982; 6: 267-70.
45. de Oliveira CG, Collares EF, Barbieri MA, Fernandes MI. Production
and concentration of saliva and salivary amylase in obese children.
Arq Gastroenterol 1997; 34: 105-11.
46. Pangborn RM, Shanon IM. Visual deprivation and parotid response to
cigarette smoking. Physiol Behavior 1971; 6: 559-61.
47. Parvinen T. Stimulated salivary flow rate, pH and lactobacillus and
yeast concentration in non-smokers. Scand J Dent Res 1984; 92: 315-8.
48. Olsen BL, McDonald JL, Gleason MJ, et al. Comparison of various
salivary parameters in smokers before and after the use a nicotine-
containing chewing gum. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 826-30.
49. Wikner S, Söder PO. Factors associated with salivary buffering capaci-
ty in young adults in Stockholm. Scand J Dent Res 1994; 102: 50-3.
50. Corant P. Effect of smoking on the antilactobacillus system in saliva.
Odontol Revy 1967; 18: 251-61.
51. Dutta SK, Orestes M, Vengulekur, Kwo P. Ethanol and human saliva:
Effect of chronic alcoholism on flow rate, composition, and epider-
mal growth factor. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87: 350-4.
52. Abelson D, Mandel ID, Karmiol M. Salivary studies in alcoholic cir-
rhosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976; 41: 188-91.
53. Nederfors T. Xerostomia and hyposalivation. Adv Dent Res 2000; 14:
48-56.
54. Scully C. Drug effects on salivary glands: dry mouth. Oral Dis 2003;
9: 165-76.
55. Longman LP, Higham SM, Rai K, Edgar WM, Field EA. Salivary
gland hypofunction in elderly patients attending a xerostomia clinic.
Gerodontology 1995; 12: 67-72.
56. Sreebny LM. Saliva: Its role in health and disease. Int Dent J 1992;
42: 287-304.
778
C. FENOLL-PALOMARES ET AL.
R
EV ESP ENFERM DIG (Madrid)
REV ESP ENFERM DIG 2004; 96(11): 773-783
Débito basal, pH y capacidad tampón de la secreción salivar en
sujetos sanos
C. Fenoll-Palomares, J. V. Muñoz-Montagud
1
, V. Sanchiz
2
, B. Herreros
2
, V. Hernández
2
, M. Mínguez
2
y
A. Benages
2
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria. Centro de Atención Primaria. Rafelbunyol, Valencia.
1
Centro de Especialidades.
Burjassot, Valencia.
2
Servicio de Gastroenterología. Hospital Clínico Universitario. Universitat de Valencia
RESUMEN
Objetivos: conocer el débito, pH y capacidad tampón de la sa
-
liva en sujetos sanos y sus relaciones con edad, sexo, obesidad y há
-
bitos tabáquico y alcohólico, así como establecer la definición de hi-
posialia.
Métodos: estudio observacional prospectivo en 159 volun-
tarios sanos (> 18 años, sin factores conocidos que disminuyan
la secreción salivar). Se ha recogido la saliva total, sin estímulo,
durante 10 minutos, determinando su débito (ml/min), pH y ca-
pacidad tampón (concentración de bicarbonato en mmol/l) me-
diante autoanalizador Radiometer ABL 520. Se han calculado
los límites inferiores del débito salivar y concentración de bicar
-
bonato por el percentil 5.
Resultados: la mediana del débito salivar es 0,48 ml/min
(rango 0,1-2). La mayor edad condiciona una disminución del
débito salivar; los sujetos con edad < 44 años presentan mayor
flujo salivar respecto a edad superior (OR 2,10). Los hombres
presentan mayor secreción salivar respecto a las mujeres (OR
3,19). La concentración de bicarbonato se correlaciona positi-
vamente con el débito salivar; los hombres presentan una ma-
yor capacidad tampón respecto a las mujeres (OR 2,81). Los lí-
mites inferiores de la normalidad del débito y concentración de
bicarbonato son 0,15 ml/min y 1,800 mmol/l, respectivamen
-
te. La obesidad y los hábitos tabáquico y alcohólico no modifi-
can las características de la secreción salivar.
Conclusiones: la edad y sexo influyen sobre el débito sali-
var; la capacidad tampón se relaciona positivamente con el -
bito salivar. Los hábitos tabáquico y alcohólico, así como la obesi-
dad no modifican la secreción salivar.
Palabras clave: Saliva. Débito salivar. Capacidad tampón salivar.
Hiposialia.
INTRODUCCIÓN
La saliva es el principal elemento para la homeostasis
bucal, ya que modula el ecosistema de la cavidad oral (1).
Entre las funciones salivares destacan la lubrificación del
bolo alimenticio facilitando la deglución, la protección
contra virus, bacterias y hongos, su capacidad tampón, la
protección y reparación de la mucosa oral y remineraliza-
ción dental (2-4). Por ello, las alteraciones en la secreción
salivar, cuantitativas y/o cualitativas, tienen efectos ad-
versos locales (caries, mucositis oral, candidiasis, infec-
ciones orales, dificultades masticatorias, etc) y extraora-
les (disfagia de penetración, halitosis, pérdida de peso)
(5-7).
La disminución de la secreción salivar se expresa clí-
nicamente por la sensación de “boca seca” o xerostomía,
aunque esta puede también aparecer, en ocasiones, sin
descenso del flujo salivar (8). La xerostomía es una situa-
ción clínica frecuente (9) que motiva numerosas consul
-
tas a diferentes especialistas (gastroenterólogos, dentis-
tas, internistas), ya que puede ser un síntoma en el curso
de enfermedades locales y sistémicas (síndrome de Sjö-
gren, diabetes mellitus, secundaria a medicamentos, irra-
diación sobre cabeza-cuello, etc.) (10-13), pero en pa-
cientes de mayor edad puede aparecer sin patología
subyacente conocida (14-15) por disminución de la se-
creción salivar ligada a la edad.
Se ha postulado que la edad condiciona una disminu
-
ción de la secreción salivar como consecuencia del pro-
ceso fisiológico de envejecimiento con atrofia parenqui-
matosa (16-21). Por el contrario, otras investigaciones
demuestran que los sujetos ancianos sanos presentan un
flujo salivar normal con gran reserva funcional, especial
-
mente en las glándulas parotídeas (22-26).
La capacidad tampón de la saliva es un factor impor-
tante, que influye en el pH salivar y en el proceso de re
-
mineralización dental, siendo la concentración de bicar
-
bonato su principal componente (27); se relaciona con el
flujo salivar (28), ya que cualquier circunstancia que dis-
minuya el flujo salivar tiende a disminuir su capacidad
tampón e incrementa el riesgo de caries (29).
Otros factores que pueden influir sobre el flujo y ca-
pacidad tampón de la saliva son el sexo, el hábito tabá-
quico y la ingesta alcohólica. Las mujeres presentan
menor débito salivar (30-32) con descenso de su capa-
cidad tampón (29). La relación entre secreción salivar y
los hábitos tabáquico y alcohólico ofrece datos contra-
dictorios, ya que se han descrito tanto secreción salivar
normal como hiposialia (33-37).
El objetivo de nuestro estudio ha sido analizar el débi-
to, pH y capacidad tampón de la secreción salivar basal
en un grupo de sujetos sanos y su relación con la edad y
sexo, así como con otras variables individuales (obesi-
dad, hábito tabáquico e ingesta alcohólica), intentando
establecer los rangos de normalidad de la población ge-
neral sana en nuestro ámbito.
MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS
Estudio observacional prospectivo realizado en sujetos
sanos que dieron su consentimiento informado para parti-
cipar en el estudio; los criterios de inclusión han sido:
edad > 18 años; buen estado de salud; ausencia de enfer-
medad sistémica crónica; no enfermedades agudas o cró-
nicas de la mucosa oral y/o de las glándulas salivares; no
ingesta de fármacos; no sensación de “boca seca” ni de
“boca ardiente”; ausencia de enfermedad infecciosa agu-
da; no insuficiencia cardiaca ni renal ni respiratoria ni he-
pática; no haber sido sometido a tratamiento mediante
irradiación sobre cuello y/o cabeza; no embarazo; las mu-
jeres en edad fértil sólo se han incluido cuando aseguran
utilizar métodos anticonceptivos seguros. Como criterios
de exclusión se han tomado los siguientes: no cumpli
-
mentación de cualquiera de los criterios de inclusión; uti
-
lización de anovulatorios como método anticonceptivo y
negativa a participar en el estudio. El estudio fue realiza-
do entre abril de 1998 y mayo de 2000.
Metódica de estudio
T
odos los sujetos remitidos para su estudio se sometie
-
ron a una exploración de la cavidad oral, por el mismo es-
tomatólogo, para descartar la presencia de enfermedades
agudas o crónicas de la mucosa oral y/o de las glándulas
salivares. Se registraron sus características demográficas
(edad, sexo, peso, talla) y hábitos tabáquico y alcohólico;
se determinó el índice de masa corporal (IMC), conside-
rándose como obesidad cuando el IMC era superior a 30
(38). Se ha considerado como fumador cuando el sujeto
refería hábito activo, independientemente del número de
cigarrillos/día y se ha considerado como hábito alcohóli-
co cuando la ingesta alcohólico es superior a 60 g/día
(hombres) o 40 g/día (mujeres).
Vol. 96. N.
° 11, 2004 DÉBITO BASAL, pH Y CAPACIDAD TAMPÓN DE LA SECRECIÓN SALIVAR
779
EN SUJETOS SANOS
REV ESP ENFERM DIG 2004; 96(11): 773-783
El estudio de la secreción salivar se ha realizado sin
estímulo alguno, entre las 9 y 11 horas en condiciones de
temperatura y humedad similares en todos los casos; la
saliva se ha recogido tras un periodo de dos horas sin co-
mer ni beber ni fumar. Se invita al sujeto a sentarse có-
modamente y tras unos minutos de relajación se le re-
quiere a que incline la cabeza levemente hacia delante y
expulse toda la saliva producida durante 10 minutos a
una probeta de cristal milimetrada, a través de un embudo
de cristal; al sujeto se le explica la importancia de evitar
la deglución de la menor cantidad de saliva.
Tras la correspondiente medición del volumen total re-
cogido en 10 minutos, una alícuota se pasa a una jeringui-
lla de plástico estéril para realizar el análisis bioquímico
por el mismo operador y con idéntica metódica; se ha uti-
lizado un autoanalizador Radiometer ABL 520 que de
forma automatizada nos ofrece el pH y bicarbonato
(mmol/l) de la muestra; cada muestra se ha analizado tres
veces para disminuir la posibilidad de error, tomándose
como válido el valor promedio.
Las variables salivares han sido: débito salivar
(ml/min), aspecto macroscópico de la saliva (transparen-
te, turbia y sanguinolenta), pH y tasa de bicarbonato
(mmol/l) como expresión de su capacidad tampón.
Método estadístico
Se ha realizado un estudio descriptivo de todas las va-
riables. El test de Kolmogorov-Smirnov se ha utilizado
para constatar la distribución normal de las variables
cuantitativas; si estas presentaban una distribución nor-
mal se han analizado mediante la t de Student o mediante
ANOVA (más de dos grupos), mientras aquellas que no
siguen una distribución normal lo han sido por la U de
Mann-Whitney o mediante el test de Kruskal-W
allis (más
de dos grupos). La correlación entre variables cuantitati
-
vas se ha realizado mediante el coeficiente de Pearson.
La distribución de las variables cualitativas en los grupos
de estudio se ha analizado mediante el estadístico Chi-
cuadrado. Las variables que han obtenido una p < 0,1 se
han incluido en un análisis de regresión logística (adelan
-
te condicional). Se ha tomado como límite de la significa-
ción estadística una p < 0,05. El tratamiento estadístico se
ha realizado con el paquete SPSS 1
1,5.
RESULTADOS
Sujetos
El grupo de estudio está constituido por 159 volunta-
rios sanos (52 hombres y 107 mujeres) cuyas característi-
cas demográficas se expresan en la tabla I; la edad es si
-
milar entre ambos sexos (p=0,796); los sujetos obesos
eran más jóvenes que los no obesos (31,94 ± 9,64
vs
45,52 ± 14,03 años, p=0,000); los sujetos con hábito ta-
báquico eran más jóvenes que los no fumadores (36,85 ±
11,75
vs 46,69 ± 14,18 años, p=0,000) y los abstemios
eran de mayor edad respecto a los sujetos con ingesta al-
cohólica (45,46 ± 14,56
vs 36,83 ± 9,54 años, p=0,001).
Débito salivar basal, pH y capacidad tampón
Las características salivares se muestran en la tabla I.
Hay que señalar que el débito salivar basal (ml/min) no
sigue una distribución normal; tomando el criterio de Na-
vazesh (39) para definir la hiposialia (débito basal igual o
inferior a 0,16 ml/min), sólo en ocho sujetos (5,03%) se
obtiene un débito salivar inferior a esta cifra que presen-
tan, además, un pH salivar menor que aquellos con débito
normal (6,5390 ± 0,3605
vs 6,8036 ± 0,2782, p=0,011) y
una menor concentración de bicarbonato (3,5625 ±
3,0654 mmol/l
vs 5,8611 ± 2,7248 mmol/l, p=0,022). En
estos sujetos con hiposialia predomina un aspecto turbio
de la saliva (6/8 sujetos).
Hay una correlación positiva significativa del débito con
pH y concentración de bicarbonato (r = 0,322, p=0,000
y r = 0,425, p=0,000, respectivamente), así como entre es-
tas dos últimas variables (r = 0,736, p=0,001).
Relaciones entre parámetros salivares y variables
demográficas
Los hombres presentan mayor débito que las mujeres
(mediana de 0,57 ml/min, rango 0,15-2
vs mediana de 0,42
ml/min, rango 0,10-2, p=0,000). No se han constatado dife-
rencias significativas en el pH salivar (6,8400 ± 0,3199 en
780 C. FENOLL-PALOMARES ET AL.
R
EV ESP ENFERM DIG (Madrid)
REV ESP ENFERM DIG 2004; 96(11): 773-783
Tabla I. Características del grupo de estudio
Variables demográficas
Sujetos 159 voluntarios sanos; edad media
44,16 ± 14,23 años (rango 18 y 75)
Sexo 52 hombres (44,58 ± 13,15 años) y
107 mujeres (43,95 ± 14,78 años)
Obesidad 17 sujetos (10,69%)
Hábito tabáquico 41 sujetos (25,78%)
Hábito alcohólico 24 sujetos (15,09%)
Variables salivares
Débito salivar Mediana 0,48 ml/min (rango 0,10 y
2). Percentil 5 = 0,15 ml/min
pH
6,7903
±
0,2874 (rango de 5,8590 y
7,5400)
Concentración de bicarbonato 5,7455 ± 2,7783 mmol/l (rango de
0,3000 y 13,2000)
Percentil 5 = 1,800 mmol/l
Aspecto macroscópico
Transparente en 88 sujetos (55,3%)
Turbidez en 61 sujetos (38,3%)
Sanguinolenta en 10 sujetos (6,3%)
los hombres y 6,7661 ± 0,2686 en las mujeres, p=0,128),
pero sí en la capacidad tampón (6,6269 ± 3,1239 mmol/l en
hombres y 5,3171 ± 2,4989 mmol/l en mujeres, p=0,010).
Para analizar la influencia de la edad, se han calculado
sus percentiles 25 y 75 (32 y 54 años, respectivamente);
la edad influye significativamente sobre el débito salivar
(menor en el grupo de mayor edad) (Tabla II), pero no so-
bre el pH y concentración de bicarbonato (Tabla III).
Sólo la edad se correlaciona negativamente con el débito
salivar (r = -0,222, p=0,005), mientras que no alcanza
significación estadística con el pH (r = -0,106, p=0,185)
ni con la tasa de bicarbonato (r = -0,030, p=0,710).
Las variables salivares en los sujetos obesos, fumado-
res o con ingesta alcohólica no se diferencian estadística-
mente de los obtenidos en sujetos sin estas condiciones
(Tablas II y IV).
Análisis univariante
Las variables salivares se han clasificado en dos cate-
gorías (inferior y superior a la mediana) para el estudio
respecto a las variables cualitativas y edad (clasificada en
inferior y superior a la mediana). En la tabla V se muestran
los resultados de este análisis.
La variable hiposialia (según Navazesh) (39) no ha
sido analizada estadísticamente, dado que sólo se presen-
ta en 8/159 sujetos (5,03%); pero hay que señalar que 6/8
son mujeres, con edad superior a 44 años en 7/8 casos y
en ningún caso hay hábito tabáquico ni ingesta alcohólica
ni obesidad.
Análisis multivariante
La menor edad (< 44 años) condiciona mayor débito
salivar (OR 2,10, IC95% 1,08-4,05, p=0,027) y esta si
-
tuación también se observa en el sexo masculino (OR
3,19, IC95% 1,56-6,50, p = 0,001); el sexo femenino
condiciona una secreción salivar con un pH por debajo de
la mediana (OR 2,13, IC95% 1,081-4,207, p = 0,029),
mientras que en los hombres se observa una mayor tasa
de bicarbonato (OR 2,81, IC95% 1,39-5,67, p = 0,004).
DISCUSIÓN
En el momento actual, se tiende a la integración de los
conocimientos médicos y odontológicos para una mejor
Vol. 96. N.
° 11, 2004 DÉBITO BASAL, pH Y CAPACIDAD TAMPÓN DE LA SECRECIÓN SALIVAR
781
EN SUJETOS SANOS
REV ESP ENFERM DIG 2004; 96(11): 773-783
Tabla II. Débito salivar según edad, obesidad, hábito
tabáquico y alcohólico
Débito salivar (ml/min)
Percentil Percentil Percentil Rangp p
25 50 75
Edad
A (41) 0,39 0,54 0,74 0,15-2
B (81) 0,35 0,52 0,72 0,10-2 0,046
C (37) 0,21 0,40 0,62 0,10-1,6
Obesidad
Sí (17) 0,35 0,48 0,63 0,20-1,10
0,969
No (142) 0,32 0,48 0,70 0,10-2
Hábito tabáquico
Sí (41) 0,40 0,52 0,76 0,18-2
0,147
No (118) 0,31 0,45 0,70 0,10-2
Hábito alcohólico
Sí (24) 0,40 0,46 0,59 0,20-1,80
0,933
No (135) 0,32 0,52 0,72 0,10-2
Grupo A (hasta percentil 25):18-32 años; grupo B (entre percentil 25-75): 33-54
años; y grupo C (superior percentil 75): 55-75 años (análisis mediante prueba de
Kruskal-Wallis). Las restantes variables se han analizado mediante la U de Mann-
Whitney. Entre paréntesis figuran el número de sujetos en cada subgrupo.
Tabla III. Variables salivares (pH y capacidad tampón)
según la edad (percentiles 25 y 75)
pH
Grupo A
6,8127 ± 0,2434
Grupo B
6,8085
±
0,2710
Grupo C
6,7254
±
0,3578
p 0,294
Tasa bicarbonato (mmol/l)
Grupo A
5,4853
±
2,3173
Grupo B 6,1101 ± 2,7575
Grupo C 5,2356 ± 3,2204
p 0,224
El análisis estadístico se ha realizado mediante ANOVA. Grupo A (hasta percentil
25): 18-32 años (n. 41). Grupo B (entre percentil 25-75): 33-54 años (n. 81). Gru-
po C (superior percentil 75): 55-75 años (n. 37).
Tabla IV. Valores promedio de las variables salivares
(pH y capacidad tampón), según variables
cualitativas del grupo de estudio
pH Bicarbonato (mmol/l)
Obesidad
6,7482 ± 0,2698 5,7176 ± 2,5812
No 6,7953 ± 0,2900 5,7488 ± 2,8096
p 0,525 0,965
Hábito tabáquico
6,7359 ± 0,2716 5,2248 ± 2,2781
No 6,8092 ± 0,2915 5,9264 ± 2,9193
p 0,160 0,119
Ingesta alcohólica
6,7554 ± 0,2991 5,5041 ± 2,6435
No 6,7965 ± 0,2860 5,7884 ± 2,8089
p 0,521 0,646
El análisis de las variables salivares se ha realizado mediante la t de Student.
asistencia sanitaria a los ciudadanos (40); por ello cree-
mos pertinente que el gastroenterólogo conozca los pro-
blemas relacionados con la saliva, ya que es la responsa-
ble más inicial de todo el proceso digestivo. Por otra
parte, la mayor longevidad, las nuevas técnicas terapéuti-
cas y el mayor consumo de medicamentos pueden afectar
a las estructuras orales, incluidas las glándulas salivares,
lo que, a su vez, puede favorecer la aparición de enferme-
dades locales y a distancia.
El análisis de la secreción salivar puede realizarse con
técnicas diferentes: a) secreción total no estimulada; b)
secreción total tras estimulación; y c) colección de saliva
de glándulas concretas, especialmente parótidas, con o
sin estimulación. La saliva total sin estímulo refleja el
flujo salivar basal y está presente en la cavidad oral du
-
rante largos periodos de tiempo (unas 14 horas), por lo
que es la principal responsable de sus propiedades pro-
tectoras, mientras que la saliva total estimulada represen
-
ta la situación tras la ingesta (estimulación fisiológica)
por lo que su acción sólo la ejerce durante unas dos horas
(3). Por lo tanto, el estudio de la secreción salivar total no
estimulada es un buen método para el análisis del estado
de las glándulas salivares, mientras que la obtenida tras
estimulación representaría la capacidad funcional de re
-
serva de estas. La facilidad en la recogida de la saliva to-
tal no estimulada y las mínimas molestias para el sujeto
hacen que esta técnica sea la más idónea para estudios
amplios de población; por estas razones hemos elegido
esta metódica en nuestro estudio.
La edad influye sobre la secreción salivar, probable-
mente por el propio proceso fisiológico de envejecimien
-
to (16-21). Nuestros resultados confirman estos datos, ya
que se objetiva que la mayor edad condiciona un descen-
so significativo del débito salivar no estimulado (r =
-0,222, p=0,005), mientras que en los sujetos más jóve-
nes (< 44 años) el flujo salivar es mayor respecto a los su-
jetos con edad > 44 años (OR 2,10).
Según nuestros datos, el débito salivar es mayor en
hombres respecto a las mujeres (OR 3,19) y este dato no
puede relacionarse con el factor edad, dado que ambos
grupos (hombres y mujeres) presentan una edad similar.
Resultados similares se describen en otros estudios (30-
32) y se sugiere que puede deberse al menor tamaño de las
glándulas salivares en las mujeres (41). Esta menor secre-
ción salivar en mujeres podría estar en relación con la ma-
yor frecuencia de “boca seca” en el sexo femenino (3).
Los datos recogidos en la literatura sobre la influencia
de la edad sobre la secreción salivar son contradictorios y
ello puede ser consecuencia de varios sesgos metodológi-
cos: grupos etarios con puntos de corte muy diferentes,
recogida de la saliva basal y/o estimulada, inclusión de
sujetos con ingesta medicamentosa, etc. (30).
Nuestros datos sobre la capacidad tampón de la saliva
(correlación positiva con el débito y menor concentración
de bicarbonato en mujeres) coinciden con los resultados
reseñados en la literatura (27-29). En nuestra serie se
puede considerar como disminución de la capacidad tam-
pón de la saliva no estimulada, una concentración de bi-
carbonato < 1,800 mmol/l (percentil 5).
Se ha postulado que la obesidad infanto-juvenil pre-
dispone a las enfermedades orales (42), incluida la ca-
ries (43); el estudio de Powers y cols. (44) no observa
diferencias entre los patrones de salivación entre obesos
y no obesos, aunque otros autores comprueban mayor
782 C. FENOLL-PALOMARES ET AL.
R
EV ESP ENFERM DIG (Madrid)
REV ESP ENFERM DIG 2004; 96(11): 773-783
Tabla V. Análisis univariante (Chi cuadrado) entre las variables salivares (categorizadas por su mediana)
y las variables cualitativas
Débito (ml/min) pH Bicarbonato (mmol/l)
< 0,48 > 0,48 < 6,8310 > 6,8310 < 5,3000 > 5,3000
Sexo
Hombre 17 35 20 32 18 34
Mujer 64 43 61 46 63 44
p
0,001 0,028 0,004
Edad
< 44 y. 34 46 38 42 39 41
> 44 y. 47 32 43 36 42 37
p
0,032 0,382 0,578
Obesidad
9 8 11 6 9 8
No 72 70 70 72 72 70
p 0,862 0,230 0,862
hábito tabáquico
19 22 21 20 26 15
No 62 56 60 58 55 63
p 0,494 0,967 0,064
Ingesta alcohólica
15 9 10 14 13 11
No 66 69 71 64 68 67
p 0,219 0,324 0,732
secreción salivar en muchachos obesos respecto al gru-
po control (45). A corto plazo el hábito tabáquico incre-
menta el flujo salivar (46), pero a largo plazo no se de-
muestran diferencias en el débito salivar entre
fumadores y no fumadores (47,48); se han descrito des-
censos del pH (47) y de la capacidad tampón (49), pero
también la normalidad de ambos parámetros en los suje-
tos fumadores (48,50). El consumo agudo de bebidas al-
cohólicas disminuye la secreción salivar (37), pero en el
alcoholismo crónico, con o sin lesiones hepáticas, los
datos son contradictorios, ya que se ha comunicado tan-
to la disminución de la secreción salivar (34,51), como
un débito normal (35) o aumentado (52).
En nuestro estudio la obesidad, hábitos tabáquico y al-
cohólico no marcan diferencias sobre las características
salivares (débito y capacidad tampón), aunque el escaso
número de sujetos con estas características no nos permi-
te realizar afirmaciones categóricas.
La reducción del flujo salivar se ha relacionado con la
sensación de “boca seca”; a pesar de su frecuencia y el
deterioro de la calidad de vida que conlleva, este síntoma
ha sido valorado de forma trivial en la práctica clínica
(11,53). La xerostomía se asocia preferentemente con la
toma de ciertos medicamentos (anticolinérgicos, simpati-
comiméticos, agentes que actúan sobre la serotonina y la
noradrenalina, etc. (54), como secuela del tratamiento ra-
dioterápico (cabeza y cuello) y ligada a conectivopatías,
tipo síndrome de Sjögren (12). En una revisión sobre 100
pacientes mayores de 60 años con xerostomía, la causa
más prevalente es el síndrome de Sjögren, seguido de la
xerostomía iatrogénica y sin causa conocida (xerostomía
idiopática); los autores observan una hiposialia (débito
salivar no estimulado < 0,2 ml/min) en el 65% de los pa-
cientes (55).
El diagnóstico de hiposialia puede establecerse por el
débito salivar, pero no hay una cifra consensuada como
punto de corte; la falta de uniformidad en este parámetro
dificulta la comparación de los distintos estudios sobre
secreción salivar y “boca seca”. En nuestra serie, hemos
considerado como hiposialia cuando el débito salivar cae
por debajo del percentil 5 (0,15 ml/min) similar a la obte-
nida por Navazesh (0,16 ml/min)(8); otras cifras relata-
das en la literatura oscilan entre 0,10 (56) y 0,20 ml/min
(55). Nuestros cuatro voluntarios sanos (2,5%), sin sensa-
ción de “boca seca”, con hiposialia, presentan unas carac-
terísticas comunes (mujeres, edad superior a la mediana,
no obesas y sin hábitos tabáquico ni alcohólico).
Para evaluar nuestros resultados sobre débito y capaci-
dad tampón salivares en sujetos sanos y demostrar su uti-
lidad diagnóstica, especialmente el punto de corte para la
consideración de hiposialia, sería necesario el estudio de
pacientes diagnosticados clínicamente de xerostomía.
Vol. 96. N.
° 11, 2004 DÉBITO BASAL, pH Y CAPACIDAD TAMPÓN DE LA SECRECIÓN SALIVAR
783
EN SUJETOS SANOS
REV ESP ENFERM DIG 2004; 96(11): 773-783
... Conclusion: The present study shows a substantial association between hepatitis B virus infection and salivary gland hypofunction, and there appears to be a correlation of the hypofunction with the chronicity of the disease. commonly preferred to the evaluations of stimulated whole saliva, since biomarkers may become diluted in the latter (Fenoll-Palomares et al., 2004;Priya et al., 2017). A simple and efficient way of accessing the functionality of the salivary glands is by measuring the salivary flow rate (SFR), SFR refers to the amount of saliva produced cumulatively from all the glands in a specified amount of time, and it is expressed as ml/min. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Salivary dysfunction is one of the extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis B virus infection. Although the pathophysiology is not fully understood, it has been linked with immune complex sequelae and liver dysfunction. Unstimulated salivary flow rate is an accurate measure of salivary gland functionality. The objective of the study was to determine the association between hepatitis B virus infection and salivary flow rates. Methods: This case-control study included 76 patients diagnosed with hepatitis B virus infection and 48 control participants. Socio-demographics and times of diagnosis for the case group were obtained using a standardized questionnaire and with the aid of patients’ records. The unstimulated salivary flow rate was determined for all participants using the suction method and recorded as volume per time (mls/min). Data was presented using frequencies and proportions, with statistical significance set at p<0.05 while the 95% confidence level was used to construct confidence intervals around estimates. Results: There was no significant difference between the distribution of ages and gender of participants in both groups. The average salivary flow rate of the cases was 0.12mls/min, and was significantly lower (p=0.000) than the control group with a mean value 0.48mls/min. The distribution of salivary flow rate differed significantly across the duration of initial diagnosis (p = 0.007). Conclusion: The present study shows a substantial association between hepatitis B virus infection and salivary gland hypofunction, and there appears to be a correlation of the hypofunction with the chronicity of the disease.
... Unstimulated whole saliva reflects basal salivary flow rate, is present for about fourteen hours a day, and is the secretion that provides protection to oral tissues. 21 Stimulated saliva cause alterations in salivary pH hence unstimulated saliva collection was preferred. The study was done on a small sample. ...
Article
Full-text available
Keywords: salivary pH, stevia rebaudiana, sucrose, mouth rinsing, sugar substitutes. Background: Nowadays sugar free food and drinks have become very popular because of increased concerns related to obesity and overweight; as it is well known that sucrose has a negative impact on both general as well as oral health. These artificial sweeteners also have some side-effects when consumed in excess. In recent decade, stevia rebaudiana, a plant derived sugar is considered as a natural and healthy alternative to sugar and artificial sweeteners. Literature pertaining to the salivary pH changes related to stevia is limited. Objective: to assess the effect of mouth rinsing with solutions containing different commercially available sugar substitutes on salivary pH. Method: the present study is a randomized controlled trial with concurrent parallel design. 85 female students aged 20-25 years were randomly allocated to four different groups. Salivary pH assessments were performed at baseline and after mouth rinsing with different sugar solutions containing Aspartame, Sucralose, Saccharin, Stevia and distilled water at 1, 20 and 60 minutes respectively. One way Analysis of variance and repeated measures Analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc tests were employed to analyze the data. Results: The results indicated that there was a statistical significant difference in the salivary pH values between group C (Stevia) and group E (Distilled water) after mouth rinsing at 20 minutes. In group C (Stevia) there was a significant rise in the salivary pH from baseline value to 1 min (p = 0.001) and 20 minutes (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Pattern of salivary pH changes after mouth rinsing with Stevia was similar to other artificial sweetener solutions which indicates that Stevia rebaudina can act as an excellent natural sugar substitute replacing the current artificial sweeteners and refined sugars and thereby help in tackling their side effects.
... At rest or during sleep the SFR is estimated to be zero. Nearly 80-90% of daily secretion is stimulated and the average stimulated SFR is 1.5-7 mL/min [2,3]. Salivary components are reported to vary due to oral conditions such as periodontitis, lichen planus, and oral submucous fibrosis, and salivary flow, pH, and composition are critical for maintaining the health of the oral cavity [4][5][6][7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Systemic and localized oral disease instigates alterations in salivary composition and content. The objective of the study was to evaluate the levels of salivary amylase, mucin, total protein levels, and periodontal inflammatory parameters in Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertensive (HTN) patients, and healthy controls. The study sample was divided into three groups: healthy, T2DM, and HTN. Salivary samples were collected from the included participants and salivary flow rate (SFR) and pH were measured. The salivary levels of amylase, mucin, and total protein concentration were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The effect of anti-hypertensive and hypoglycemic drugs on the salivary flow rate, salivary pH, mucin, amylase, and total protein concentrations was evaluated. The results were analyzed with Chi-squared and analysis of variance to compare the means and standard deviations of variables among the study groups. SFR was significantly (p < 0.01) lower among diabetics (0.78 ± 0.45 mL/min) in comparison to healthy (1.52 ± 0.62 mL/min) and hypertensive (1.07 ± 0.7 mL/min) subjects. PISA values were significantly higher in T2DM (1029 ± 234.6 mm2) and HTN (799.4 ± 155.05 mm2) subjects when compared to controls, indicating a high inflammatory burden of oral cavity caused by these conditions, and showed statistically significant difference between the groups (p-value < 0.001). Mucin levels were significantly higher (p-value < 0.05) in hypertensive patients (4.6 ± 1.17 units) compared to diabetics (3.59 ± 1.03 unit/mL) and healthy (2.26 ± 1.09 units/mL) subjects. Amylase levels were significantly higher among healthy subjects (1.76 ± 0.75 mg/mL) compared to both hypertensive (1.33 ± 1.0 mg/mL) and diabetic (0.88 ± 0.57 mg/mL) patients. Total protein concentration was significantly raised (p-value < 0.001) in diabetics (37.67 ± 3.12 mg/mL) compared to healthy (29.3 ± 3.22 mg/mL) subjects. Significant differences in BOP, CAL, and PPD was observed (p-value < 0.001). Use of antihypertensive and hypoglycemic drugs showed a significant influence on salivary flow rate, protein, mucin, and amylase levels. T2DM and HTN induced irregularities in salivary flow rate, pH, amylase, and mucin levels and showed an increased incidence of moderate to severe periodontitis in patients. UWS levels of SFR, mucin, amylase, and total protein can be used as diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers in patients with T2DM and HTN with oral disease.
... Fenoll-Palomares et al. also found normal values for the buffering capacity of saliva and salivary flow rate in obese patients. However, a reduced salivary flow rate in obese patients, owing to the side effects of several medications used to treat diseases concomitant with obesity [10]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The results suggest that the salivary levels of mutans streptococci increase following bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients.
... In addition, the results of this study demonstrated that female athletes have a lower whole saliva secretion rate than male athletes in the 4 time-points (Table 4). This difference is in accordance with other studies (Inoue et al., 2006;Percival et al., 1994) and can be explained by the smaller size of salivary glands due to the smaller body sizes (Inoue et al., 2006) or because of "oral dryness" (xerostomia) see in females (FenolI-Palomares et al., 2004). ...
Article
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the effects of training load on stress tolerance (ST) and secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) in male and female high-intensity functional fitness (HIFF) athletes during two different 10 and consecutive weekly training volume loads [higher (week 1) and lower volume (week 2)]. Methods: 14 athletes [7 males: 29.3 (±5.8) years; 86.3 (±8.2) kg and 176.8 (±3.8) cm and 7 females: 32.7 (±4.4) years; 60.0 (±6.7) kg and 162.5 (±5.9) cm] participated. The ST, assessed by Daily Analysis of Life Demand in Athletes questionnaire (DALDA) and Saliva sampling were performed in four time-points (pre (T1) and post (T2) week 1; pre (T3) and post (T4) week 2). Results: Female athletes showed a decrease in ST (symptoms of stress) from 15 T1 to T3 [F(3,36) = 7.184, p˂ 0.001, ηp2 = 0.374], without difference in male athletes (p > .05). There is a significant difference of SIgA concentration [F(3.36) = 3.551; p = .024; ηp2 = 0.228], with a significant decrease in female athletes group in T2 compared to T1 (p = .013) and T4 (p = .023). In addition, the different training volume loads did not impact mucosal immunity in male athletes (p > .05). Conclusion: The current findings suggest that higher HIFF volume results in decreased ST and SIgA concentration in female 20 athletes and a subsequent decrease in training volume loads contributed to restoring these variables.
... Relating the action of salivary α-Amylase to the reduction in the flow rate in diabetics, a reduction in the activity of salivary α-Amylase could be expected. Fenoll et al. 23 has stated that a decrease in the salivary flow rate declines the pH of the saliva. As the optimum pH of 7 is required for the activity of salivary α-Amylase, the enzyme activity is expected to be low with the decreased pH present in the diabetics. ...
Article
Purpose: To evaluate the dental caries prevalence in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) as compared to healthy children and, to assess the salivary components (flow rate, glucose, α-Amylase, Streptococcus mutans) and dental plaque in relation to their dental caries status. Methods: Dental caries were estimated by using the DMFS index and dental plaque by Sillness and Loe plaque index. The following methods were used to assess the salivary components; draining method to determine the flow rate; glucose oxidase peroxidase method for glucose; substrate method for α-Amylase, Mitis Salivarius Bacitracin agar was used to culture Streptococcus mutans. Results: Caries prevalence was significantly lower in T1DM. In the diabetic group, a significant positive correlation was found between DMFS value and plaque, DMFS value and salivary glucose, and also with DMFS value and salivary α-Amylase. A significant negative correlation was found between the DMFS value and the unstimulated salivary flow rate. The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that decrease in the unstimulated salivary flow rate to be significantly associated with increasing DMFS values. Conclusion: The caries prevalence was found to be low in T1DM when compared to the healthy children, the cause for it being related to the low plaque scores. Low caries prevalence could also be due to the restriction of sucrose in their diet. Clinical significance: As clinicians, along with restoring the smiles of a child patient, we have to retrospectively analyze the factors involved in the causation of dental caries. Educating the parents and the child in regard to this will help prevent the occurrence of any new carious lesion. How to cite this article: Manjushree R, Anandakrishna L, Prasad KS K, et al. Evaluation of Salivary Components and Dental Plaque in Relation to Dental Caries Status in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(S-2):S121-S125.
... A small, but significant difference in salivary pH was observed in YM (7.32) compared to SF women (7.45). The minor effect of age and gender in pH is in agreement with previous works that studied the effect of these two factors separately (Fenoli-Palomares et al., 2004). Therefore, the small differences found in salivary pH could be due to factors such as oral hygiene conditions (e.g. ...
Article
This study focus for the first time, in looking for age-gender effects on in vivo volatile release during wine consumption, also considering oral physiological differences (e.g. saliva composition). To do so, the in-mouth Head Space Sorptive Extraction technique was used, which allowed monitoring the oral release of twenty-four different types of volatile compounds from white and red wines. Thirty-two individuals (n = 32) males and females, belonging to two different age groups: young (18-35 y.o) and senior (>55 y.o.) participated in this analytical in vivo study. Results showed differences in volatile release among age-gender groups, which also depended on the volatile compound and wine type. Senior groups (SM, SF) showed a similar release behaviour among them. Contrarily, young males showed a higher release (between 10-29%) of alcohols and esters indistinctly of the wine type, while young females showed the lowest oral volatile release among the four age-gender groups. Gender differences in volatile release were more evident in young than in seniors. A higher release of furanic compounds (furfural and 5-methyl furfural) in seniors was likely related to differences in their saliva composition (total protein content, minerals (Mg, Zn) and α-amylase activity).
... 3-9 mmHg [22,26] (resting pressure) salivation 1.50-6.00 mL/min [19,31,32] 0.48 mL/min [31,33] peristaltic wave velocity 1.5-6.0 cm/s [34,35] A second high pressure zone forms from the mid to the distal esophagus and stops at the LES, the esophagogastric junction [26]. ...
Article
Introduction: The incidence of esophageal diseases such as eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, or esophageal carcinoma has increased significantly in recent years. There is a lack of suitable therapeutic options to enable effective therapy. Areas covered: This review addresses the challenges of drug targeting to the esophagus. It describes the physiology of the esophagus, physiological parameters relevant for drug targeting and the pathophysiology of selected diseases of the esophagus. Furthermore, conventional dosage forms such as glucocorticoid-containing solutions or suspensions, inhaler devices and orodispersible tablets are discussed. Innovative drug delivery systems such as stents, mucoadhesive films and 3D printed devices are also presented. Expert opinion: Drug delivery to the esophagus presents challenges, especially in terms of the short transit time and the rapid clearance. While conventional dosage forms such as solutions or suspensions offer the advantage of being available quickly and patient-specific, innovative drug delivery systems address the problem of the short transit time and can thus enable long-lasting exposure.
... Women undergo menstrual cycle periodically, and this is known to change volume and composition of saliva [20]. Another research revealed that women showed lower salivary flow rates compared to men, whereas salivary pH didn't show significant difference [21]. ...
Article
A clinical study was performed to determine the in vivo mass loss of both lozenges in 16 healthy volunteers. In vitro, mass loss over time was measured for both formulations and correlated to the release of CPC and benzocaine. In vivo, the oral mass loss profiles of both lozenges were similar, with a mean difference between the two curves, up to the first point greater than 85% of 3.2%, and a f2 similarity factor of 69%. In vitro, the mass loss of both lozenges was similar and a strong correlation between mass loss and release of CPC and benzocaine was observed, indicating that the active ingredients were homogeneously dispersed within the lozenges. Based on the results, it was possible to establish a link between the in vitro and in vivo drug release and mass losses using an in vitro–in vivo correlation (IVIVC). In vivo release profiles of benzocaine and CPC were calculated and found to be similar for the sugar-free and sugared lozenges; more than 85% of the active ingredients were released in 186 and 209 s, respectively. These results suggest that in vitro mass loss and corresponding drug release is an adequate surrogate for bioequivalence studies, waiving their need for lozenges with excipient changes, and that the clinical risk–benefit profile of sugar-free CPC/benzocaine (1.4 mg/10 mg) lozenges is unlikely to differ from sugared lozenges.
Article
Full-text available
This document was produced by the 'EU-Working Group† on Tobacco and Oral Health' supported by the EU Commission (the 'Europe Against Cancer' programme).
Article
Full-text available
There is considerable difficulty in the making of initial clinical decisions as to whether a given patient has salivary gland hypofunction, and hence requires additional salivary gland evaluation. This study identified a set of four clinical measures that, together, successfully predicted the presence or absence of salivary gland hypofunction. The four measures were: dryness of lips, dryness of buccal mucosa, absence of saliva produced by gland palpation, and total DMFT; they were derived from discriminant analysis of data collected from 71 individuals with normal and low salivary flow rates. These measures are proposed as criteria for clinical decision-making, as well as for classification of patients in studies of salivary gland dysfunction syndromes. This study also identified unstimulated whole salivary flow rates of 0.12-0.16 mL/min as the critical range separating individuals with salivary gland hypofunction from those with normal gland function.
Article
Although oral candidiasis is frequently seen in the elderly, the factors determining candidal growth have insufficiently been explored. Hence, we examined the influence of aging on candidal adhesion and growth-inhibitory agents in saliva in 45 healthy volunteers and 60 patients with oral candidiasis. Both non-stimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates (SFRs) in the healthy controls decreased with aging. A gradual decrease of SFRs with aging was also observed in the patients, and the SFR levels were markedly lower than those in the controls. Although the salivary glucose levels were almost constant in all age groups, secretory immunoglobulin A and lactoferrin levels in saliva were significantly decreased statistically with age, and a marginal age-associated decrease in transferrin levels was also observed. In addition, the generation of superoxide from neutrophils in saliva and their Candida killing activity decreased with age, and these phenomena were more apparent in the patients. Furthermore, a larger number of Candida adhered to oral keratinocytes obtained from the elderly healthy controls than to those obtained from young controls. Correspondingly, keratinocytes from the aged controls showed more concanavalin-A binding sites than those from the young controls. However, oral Candida did not increase with increasing age in the controls, although an age-associated increase of oral Candida was observed in the patients. Taken together, these results indicate that the decreases of SFRs and salivary anti-candidal factors, suppression of salivary neutrophil function and the increase of candidal adhesion sites on keratinocytes predispose elderly individuals to oral candidiasis.
Eighteen patients with alcoholic cirrhosis were examined, and parotid saliva was collected. Enlargements of the parotid glands were seen in eleven of the eighteen patients (61%). This percentage is in accord with the data previously reported. The salivary findings of increased flow rate, protein, and amylase levels indicate that hypertrophy and increased acinar function may be a component of the parotid enlargement and that, furthermore, a fatty replacement of functional gland tissue is probably not involved. In addition, the salivary electrolyte changes found, increased potassium with effectively decreased sodium excretion, suggest that the elevated aldosterone level commonly found in cirrhotic patients affects salivary secretions in these patients in much the same way as it does in patients with hypertension.
Article
The volumes of 153 submandibular salivary glands were determined by a method of differential weighings in air and in a fluid of low density. Volumes ranged from below 2 cm3 to over 15 cm3. Male glands were larger than female glands on average by 50 per cent. In old age a reduction in gland volume was noted. Frequent individual contralateral volume differences were found. 8.5 per cent of submandibular glands were directly continuous with the sublingual gland. Inaccuracies in methods employing a direct estimation of volume were overcome in the present method in which direct measurements were made only of weights. For the clinician, the present finding of a wide range of inter- and intra-subject variability in size and shape of submandibular glands is of both diagnostic and surgical importance.
Article
Parotid saliva samples from 24 alcoholic subjects without evidence of cirrhosis were analyzed for changes in flow rate, composition, and epidermal growth factor (EGF) secretion. Mean (+/- SE) stimulated parotid saliva flow rate (ml/min/gland) was significantly (p less than 0.01) lower in alcoholic subjects than in matched control subjects. Reduction in parotid saliva flow rate was associated with significant (p less than 0.05) decrease in total protein and amylase secretion in this group of patients. In addition, secretion of immunoreactive EGF, a specific salivary protein, was also markedly reduced (p less than 0.05) in alcoholic patients. None of the parotid saliva samples from the alcoholic subjects had detectable bioactivity of EGF in saliva. These data suggest that chronic alcohol ingestion is associated with significant changes in parotid saliva secretion and its composition, which may perpetuate and compound ethanol-induced injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Article
Salivary gland dysfunction is uniformly detrimental to the oral cavity. Its effects on the GI tract have begun to be explored. Dry mouth is a common complaint among older adults, probably due to systemic disease and its therapy rather than the aging process per se. Evaluation of complaints of dry mouth should include medical history, sialometry and physical examination. Numerous medications can elicit drug-induced xerostomia. Patients who have received radiation therapy to the head and neck region often have permanent radiation-induced xerostomia, which has been linked to esophagitis. SS is an autoimmune systemic exocrinopathy resulting in irreversible salivary gland dysfunction. SS has numerous GI manifestations, including dysphagia, temporal defects of deglutition, esophageal dysmotility, gastritis, pancreatitis and liver disease. Management of salivary hypofunction is directed toward preserving the dentition and improving patient comfort. Drug-induced xerostomia is often correctable by altering the therapeutic modality.
Article
We have evaluated the possible relationship between major salivary gland fluid secretion rate and characteristics of the oral phase of swallowing in 35 different-aged, healthy men and women. All subjects displayed normal function of the parotid and submandibular glands and oral swallow patterns on ultrasound evaluation that were comparable to previous reports. In this study group we found no significant relationships between salivary flow rates (unstimulated, stimulated) and any oral swallow measure. Evidence of a subtle, age-related oral motor change (multiple hyoid and tongue gestures) was seen but swallow duration times did not show a linear relationship to age. This study demonstrates that healthy individuals, despite a wide range in their salivary gland fluid secretory capacity, are generally similar in the characteristics of their oropharyngeal swallow.