Comparison of rigid vs flexible sigmoidoscopy in detection of significant anorectal lesions

General Surgery, Scunthorpe General Hospital, Scunthorpe, UK.
Colorectal Disease (Impact Factor: 2.35). 02/2005; 7(1):61-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00701.x
Source: PubMed


Sigmoidoscopy is an essential tool in colorectal clinics in the detection of anorectal lesions including rectosigmoid adenomas and carcinomas. However, rigid sigmoidoscope (RS) is still more widely used than flexible sigmoidoscope (FS) as the primary investigation, despite the fact that the latter is more comfortable to the patient and has greater diagnostic yield. Hence we wanted to compare the two modalities in terms of diagnostic use for picking up significant anorectal lesions.
A retrospective review of all patients referred to the colorectal clinic who had undergone both rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy for investigation of colorectal symptoms in 2001 was done. Findings recorded during rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy including depth of insertion, site of lesion and complications were analysed.
152 patients underwent both rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy as part of investigation of colorectal symptoms. Of the 115 (75.6%) declared normal by RS, 39 (33.9%) had significant lesions including 7 polyps and 4 malignant lesions within 20 cm of the anal verge during FS. Of the 31 patients (20.4%) in whom RS was not helpful due to faecal loading, 15 (48.4%) had significant lesions including 4 malignancies and 1 polyp --all within 20 cm of the anal verge during FS. Only 2 polyps and 1 malignant lesion were picked up by both flexible and rigid sigmoidoscopy. There were no complications in both procedures.
Since flexible sigmoidoscopy is superior to rigid sigmoidoscopy in terms of patient comfort, diagnostic value and ease of doing procedures like biopsy and polypectomy; it can be used as a front line investigation to exclude colorectal pathology in out patient clinics. The utility of rigid sigmoidoscope is in question and in view of obvious shortcomings, may be replaced by flexible sigmoidoscopy, though obvious resource constraints need to be considered.

1 Follower
43 Reads
    • "This follows the worldwide trend because of the superiority of the flexible sigmoidoscpe in detecting lesions and the ease of performing procedures such as biopsy and polypectomy with it (Traul et al., 1983). In a retrospective study by Rao et al., 33.9% of patients who were declared normal by rigid sigmoidoscopy had lesions on flexible sigmoidoscopy (Rao et al., 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Large bowel endoscopy, the most accurate diagnostic investigation of the colon and rectum has been available at the Korle-Bu Teaching for close to two decades and has been used mostly for diagnosis. This retrospective study assessed patients who have undergone large bowel endoscopy, with the aim of defining the utilization of the diagnostic yield and the predominance of the varied methods. From January 1998 to December 2011, a total of 2,151 patients comprising 1,302(60.5%) males and 763(35.5%) females underwent large bowel endoscopy. Patient age ranged from 8 to 100 years with a median age of 53 years and an inter-quartile range of 25 - 72 years. The proportion of the varied methods was: colonoscopy (832; 39%), flexible sigmoidoscopy (704; 33%), rigid sigmoidoscopy (406; 19%) and proctoscopy (192; 9%). Bleeding per rectum (57.0%) was the commonest primary complaint with an overall diagnostic yield of 48.4%. In 888(41.6%) cases no pathology was found. Haemorrhoidal disease accounted for 690(32.3%) cases followed by tumours 191(9.0%). Sigmoidoscopy (both rigid and flexible) diagnosed 141(95.3%) of the tumours and colonoscopy diagnosed the remaining 7(4.7%) tumours Complete colonoscopy was achieved in 491(59%) cases scheduled for colonoscopy. In most symptomatic cases the diagnostic yield of endoscopy was high with tumours being the second commonest diagnosis after haemorrhoids. Many of the tumours were diagnosed with the sigmoidoscope. It is therefore recommended that flexible sigmoidoscopy be made available in all hospital in Ghana.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One-stop rectal bleeding clinics (RBC) are designed to diagnose and treat colorectal diseases that present with rectal bleeding. The Queen Elizabeth Hospital RBC is an open access clinic and is unique in South Australia. It offers flexible sigmoidoscopy and facilities for treating common anorectal conditions. Data of all patients presenting to the RBC were prospectively recorded into a database. Data were collected on the patient details, presentation, medical history, physical examination, treatment and intended follow-up. A total of 1539 cases was seen in the clinic between March 2000 and February 2006. Flexible sigmoidoscopy was carried out in 1145 cases (75.03%). Banding or injection of haemorrhoids was carried out in 383 cases. A total of 590 patients was referred for colonoscopy and of these, 27 were diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell cancer of the anus. Most of these patients were more than 50 years old (26 of 27; 96.30%) and had associated symptoms, such as weight loss or altered bowel habit with their rectal bleeding (23 of 27; 85.19%). Rectal bleeding clinics can facilitate early diagnosis of colorectal malignancy and can also provide a 'one-stop shop' for treating benign anorectal conditions.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2007 · ANZ Journal of Surgery
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Here we give an overview of colorectal cancer screening strategies with an emphasis on the diagnosis and management of rectal cancer. We review the published studies on screening in the high-risk population, including patients with a history of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease and inherited conditions. In the average-risk population, the evidence base for a number of screening strategies is evaluated, including endoscopy, contrast studies and faecal occult blood testing. Screening guidelines in the high-risk population are predominantly based on case-control studies comparing the incidence of colorectal cancer in screened and control groups. Screening the average-risk population for colorectal cancer reduces cancer-specific mortality by 15% after biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing and 50-80% after flexible sigmoidoscopy. All of the screening strategies outlined have a greater sensitivity for distal lesions than proximal lesions.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2007 · Clinical Oncology
Show more