Anxiety Disorders in Older Puerto Rican Primary Care Patients
Anxiety Disorders Center, The Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital's Mental Health Network, 200 Retreat Avenue, Hartford, CT 06106, USA. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
(Impact Factor: 4.24).
03/2005; 13(2):150-6. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.2.150
Authors examined the frequency and comorbidity of anxiety disorders among aging Puerto Ricans seen in primary care.
A group of 303 middle-aged and older low-socioeconomic-status Puerto Ricans attending primary-care clinics were surveyed, using a Spanish-language diagnostic interview.
Twenty-four percent of participants met probable DSM criteria for at least one anxiety disorder in the previous year, especially generalized anxiety disorder, specific phobia, and panic attacks. Psychiatric comorbidity was common; the occurrence of most anxiety disorders increased the conditional risk of a comorbid disorder from 5- to 30-fold.
The present results suggest a need to screen at-risk patients in primary care settings serving this population.
Available from: David Kissane
- "Despite anxiety being one of the most common psychiatric conditions in later life (Gonçalves et al., 2011), only recently has interest gained momentum into anxiety among residents of aged care facilities (known variously as nursing homes, hostels, assisted living facilities, or long-term care/residential homes). This is surprising, particularly given that psychiatric disorders commonly precipitate admission into residential care (Luppa et al., 2010), and older residents represent an increasingly frail and medically ill group who are at increased risk for anxiety (Tolin et al., 2005; Gerolimatos et al., 2013). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
To synthesize and summarize the studies examining the prevalence rate of anxiety disorders and symptoms in older adults living in residential aged care.
Using the PRISMA guidelines, five electronic databases were searched using key terms and subject headings, as well as reference lists of relevant papers. The search was limited to literature published in English. Eligible studies examined the prevalence of anxiety disorders or symptoms in aged care residents aged 50+ years.
A total of 2249 articles were identified, of which 18 studies (with a total of 5927 participants) were included in this review. The rate of overall anxiety disorders ranged from 3.2% to 20%, with the highest quality studies estimating a prevalence rate of 5% to 5.7%. Generalized anxiety disorder and specific phobias were found to be the most common anxiety disorders among aged care residents, while clinically significant anxiety symptoms were found to be more frequent (6.5% to 58.4%) than threshold disorders.
Anxiety disorders and anxiety symptoms are common in older aged care residents. Given the paucity and overall quality of research examining anxiety within this population and the heterogeneity found in studies, further research is needed to help clarify this issue.
- "In community-dwelling older adults, the estimated prevalence of GAD is 11.2% (Tolin, Robison, Gaztambide, & Blank, 2005), with 15% to 56% of older adults experiencing symptoms of anxiety (Bryant, Jackson, & Ames, 2008 ). However , less than 30% of older adults are likely to seek treatment (Troller, Anderson, Sachdev, Brodaty, & Andrews, 2007). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: With the recent updates to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition; DSM-5), there are many questions on how to care for older adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and other psychiatric conditions. The current article reviews the new changes to the DSM-5 for diagnosis of GAD, discusses new anxiety assessment scales that are validated in older adults, evaluates pharmacological agents that have been studied in older adults for GAD treatment, and provides monitoring recommendations to help those who provide care to older adults experiencing GAD. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 41(4), 10-20.].
Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.
Available from: Mathew James Summers
- "Third, because we examine test-retest invariance, temporal stability, and associations of latent factors over a 3 months interval for older adults using the DASS-21, the findings here could be unique to this time interval, to this age group, and to this version of the DASS. Fourth, despite the findings here supporting temporal stability over 3 months, it is highly probable that changes could be more noticeable across longer testretest intervals as there are existing data showing increased depression, anxiety and stress with age (Beekman et al. 1998; Tolin et al. 2005; Wittchen et al. 2001). Although we collected DASS-21 ratings at five different time points (initial, 3, 12, 18 and 24 months) over 24 months, the number of ratings available for the participants involved in the study at 12, 18 and 24 months were considered too low (206, 196 and 163, respectively) for longitudinal analyses beyond 3 months. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study examined the factor structure and test-retest invariance, and temporal stability and uniqueness of the latent factors (depression, anxiety, and stress) of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) in group a of 269 older adults (age ranging from 60 to 85 years) from the general community. Participants completed the DASS-21 twice, 3 months apart. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of their ratings at Time 1 indicated support for the original 3-factor oblique model (factors for depression, anxiety, and stress). Additional analyses showed support for test-retest invariance for both the measurement (configural, metric and thresholds) and structural (variances and covariances) components of this model. Results also indicated temporal stability and uniqueness of the latent factors. The practical, theoretical, research and clinical implications of the findings are discussed
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.