Uncoupling Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Activity from Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Control by Deregulating Polo-Like Kinase 1

Division of Molecular Biology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Molecular and Cellular Biology (Impact Factor: 4.78). 04/2005; 25(5):2031-44. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.25.5.2031-2044.2005
Source: PubMed


Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) plays a role in numerous events in mitosis, but how the multiple functions of Plk1 are separated is poorly understood. We studied regulation of Plk1 through two putative phosphorylation residues, Ser-137 and Thr-210. Using phospho-specific antibodies, we found that Thr-210 phosphorylation precedes Ser-137 phosphorylation in vivo, the latter occurring specifically in late mitosis. We show that expression of two activating mutants of these residues, S137D and T210D, results in distinct mitotic phenotypes. Whereas expression of both phospho-mimicking mutants as well as of the double mutant leads to accelerated mitotic entry, further progression through mitosis is dramatically different: the T210D mutant causes a spindle assembly checkpoint-dependent delay, whereas the expression of the S137D mutant or the double mutant results in untimely activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) and frequent mitotic catastrophe. Using nonphosphorylatable Plk1-S137A and Plk1-T210A mutants, we show that both sites contribute to proper mitotic progression. Based on these observations, we propose that Plk1 function is altered at different stages of mitosis through consecutive posttranslational events, e.g., at Ser-137 and Thr-210. Furthermore, our data show that uncontrolled Plk1 activation can uncouple APC/C activity from spindle assembly checkpoint control.

Download full-text


Available from: René H Medema
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Errors in the cell cycle, particularly during mitosis, have recently been implicated in tumorigenesis and cancer formation. Several protein kinases, including the major mitotic kinases Cdkl, Aurora A, Aurora B, Nek2, and Plkl, and the Polo-like kinase (Plk) family, Plkl, Plk2, Plk3, and Plk4, are known to play important roles in the regulation of mitosis and other phases of the cell cycle to prevent such errors. However, the mechanisms underlying many of the roles of these kinases are unknown because the appropriate substrates have not been identified. To aid in substrate identification and to gain insight into the role of substrate specificity in the regulation of these kinases, we have determined the motifs of the major mitotic kinases and the Plk family of kinases by Positional Scanning Oriented Peptide Library Screening (PS-OPLS), which gives complete, unbiased motifs. The PS-OPLS motif of Plkl revealed a previously unreported specificity of Plkl leading to the identification of new candidate substrates, including p31/Comet, which is involved in the silencing of the spindle assembly checkpoint for anaphase onset. Additionally, the motifs and the localizations of the major mitotic kinases lead us to put forward a model potentially explaining how the major mitotic kinases, despite having overlapping localizations and access to the same sites on substrates, phosphorylate distinct sites. This model, if true, would suggest that the motifs and localizations of all of the major mitotic kinases coordinately direct the group of kinases to the appropriate substrates. The motifs of the Plk family reveal that Plk2 and Plk3 phosphorylate sites previously primed by phosphorylation by a tyrosine kinase, suggesting that these kinases may integrate tyrosine kinase and serine/threonine kinase signaling in a novel way.
    Preview · Article · Apr 2009
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During mitosis the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays the onset of anaphase and mitotic exit until all chromosomes are bipolarly attached to spindle fibers. Both lack of attachment due to spindle/kinetochore defects and lack of tension across kinetochores generate the "wait anaphase" signal transmitted by the SAC, which involves the evolutionarily conserved Mad1, Mad2, Mad3/BubR1, Bub1, Bub3 and Mps1 proteins, and inhibits the activity of the ubiquitin ligase Cdc20/APC, that promotes both sister chromatid dissociation in anaphase and mitotic exit. In particular, Mad3/BubR1 is directly implicated, together with Mad2, in Cdc20 inactivation in both human and yeast cells, suggesting that its activity is likely finely regulated. We show that budding yeast Mad3, like its human orthologue BubR1, is a phosphoprotein that is hyperphosphorylated during mitosis and when SAC activation is triggered by microtubule depolymerizing agents, kinetochore defects or lack of kinetochore tension. In vivo Mad3 phosphorylation depends on the Polo kinase Cdc5 and, to a minor extent, the Aurora B kinase Ipl1. Accordingly, replacing with alanines five serine residues belonging to Polo kinase-dependent putative phosphorylation sites dramatically reduces Mad3 phosphorylation, suggesting that Mad3 is likely an in vivo target of Cdc5.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2005 · Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Polo, the founding member of the family of polo-like kinases (Plks) was identified in a Drosophila screen for mutants affecting spindle pole behavior.(1) Several mutants showed defects at their spindle poles and were hence named after the magnetic poles of the earth or geo-magnetic phenomena associated with them, like Polo and Aurora. Currently, the conserved family of Plks consists of many members throughout various species. Multiple Plks are present in mammalian cells (Plk1, Plk2/Snk, Plk3/Fnk/Prk, and Plk4/Sak) and Xenopus (Plx1-3), whereas in other species only one member has been identified, like Polo in Drosophila, Cdc5 in budding yeast and Plo1 in fission yeast. Plks are now viewed as important regulators of multiple functions before and during the mitotic cell division. In this review, we will focus our attention on human Plk1 and its family members Plk2-4 and the many roles they play during mitosis. Furthermore, we will describe the currently knowledge of the regulation of these functions.
    Full-text · Article · May 2006 · Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)
Show more