Article

Epidemiology of life-threatening and lethal anaphylaxis: A review

Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital, Nancy Cedex, France.
Allergy (Impact Factor: 6.03). 05/2005; 60(4):443-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00785.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Severe anaphylaxis is a systemic reaction affecting two or more organs or systems and is due to the release of active mediators from mast cells and basophils. A four-grade classification routinely places 'severe' anaphylaxis in grades 3 and 4 (death could be graded as grade 5). Studies are underway to determine the prevalence of severe and lethal anaphylaxis in different populations and the relative frequencies of food, drug, latex and Hymenoptera anaphylaxis. These studies will also analyse the risk arising from the lack of preventive measures applied in schools (personalized management protocols) and from the insufficient use of self-injected adrenalin. Allergy-related conditions may account for 0.2-1% of emergency consultations. Severe anaphylaxis affects 1-3 per 10 000 people, but for the United States and Australia figures are even higher. It is estimated to cause death in 0.65-2% of patients, i.e. 1-3 per million people. An increased prevalence has been revealed by monitoring hospitalized populations by reference to the international classification of disease (ICD) codes. The relative frequency of aetiological factors of allergy (food, drugs, insects and latex) varies in different studies. Food, drug and Hymenoptera allergies are potentially lethal. The risk of food-mediated anaphylaxis can be assessed from the number of personalized management protocols in French schools: 0.065%. Another means of assessment may be the rate of adrenalin prescriptions. However, an overestimation of the anaphylaxis risk may result from this method (0.95% of Canadian children). Data from the literature leads to several possibilities. First, a definition of severe anaphylaxis should be agreed. Secondly, prospective, multicentre enquiries, using ICD codes, should be implemented. Moreover, the high number of anaphylaxis cases for which the aetiology is not identified, and the variation in aetiology in the published series, indicate that a closer cooperation between emergency specialists and allergists is essential.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Anne Denise Moneret-Vautrin
    • "Du fait d'une grande hétérogénéité des méthodologies utilisées dans les études épidémiologiques, il existe une importante disparité des incidences retrouvées. En France, le réseau d'Allergo-vigilance, créé en 2002, permet un recensement déclaratif des réactions graves [5]. Le Groupe d'études des réactions anaphylactiques peranesthésiques (GERAP) collige les réactions peranesthésiques [6]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: L’anaphylaxie est une réaction d’hypersensibilité sévère, potentiellement fatale, de mécanisme IgE-dépendant ou non. Sa prévalence est estimée à 0,3 % en Europe. Les auteurs exposent les bases physiopathogéniques de la réaction anaphylactique, ses aspects cliniques et les facteurs de risque, rappelant que le pronostic dépend de la rapidité du diagnostic et du traitement. Comme le soulignent les recommandations internationales, l’administration rapide d’adrénaline est essentielle. La littérature fait état d’une sous-utilisation de ce médicament. Les auteurs proposent un algorithme de prise en charge de l’anaphylaxie en fonction du grade de sévérité basée sur la classification de Ring et Messmer. À la sortie de l’hôpital, la prescription d’une trousse d’urgence contenant 2 stylos auto-injecteurs d’adrénaline avec éducation à leur utilisation est essentielle. Un document exposant la réaction clinique, ses circonstances de survenue et son traitement doit être remis au patient. Au décours d’une réaction anaphylactique, une consultation allergologique est indispensable dans l’objectif d’identifier l’allergène responsable et mettre en œuvre une stratégie préventive secondaire pour prévenir la récidive. Il convient de recommander au patient et à son entourage de conserver les aliments et médicaments pour faciliter l’enquête étiologique réalisée par l’allergologue.
    No preview · Article · May 2015 · Journal Europeen des Urgences et de Reanimation
  • Source
    • "Buckwheat appears on the list of priority allergenic foods in Japan and South Korea (Taylor and Hefle 2005) but not other countries where buckwheat allergy is less frequently encountered. Buckwheat allergy can also be quite severe for some affected patients (Noma et al. 2001; Moneret-Vautrin et al. 2005; Imamura et al. 2008). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of undeclared buckwheat residues in foods have been developed to support labeling regulations in Japan (Akiyama et al. 2004; Panda et al. 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) is a commonly allergenic food especially in Asia where buckwheat is more commonly consumed. Wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus, recently changed to Fallopia convolvulus) is an annual weed prevalent in grain-growing areas of the United States. Wild buckwheat is not closely related to edible buckwheat although the seeds do have some physical resemblance. A large shipment of wheat into Japan was halted by the discovery of the adventitious presence of wild buckwheat seeds over possible concerns for buckwheat-allergic consumers. However, IgE-binding was not observed to an extract of wild buckwheat using sera from 3 buckwheat-allergic individuals either by radio-allergosorbent test inhibition or by immunoblotting after protein separation by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Furthermore, the extract of wild buckwheat was not detected in a buckwheat enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay developed with antisera against common buckwheat. Thus, wild buckwheat is highly unlikely to pose any risk to buckwheat-allergic individuals. The common names of plants should not be a factor in the risk assessment for possible cross-allergenicity.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2011 · Journal of Food Science
  • Source
    • "Nevertheless, admissions in English NHS hospitals for (all cause) anaphylaxis (severe allergic reactions) rose steadily from 2821 in 2004-05 to 3595 in 2008-09 [2]. Anaphylaxis is responsible for the death of approximately 1 to 3 individuals per million population [3]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Allergy is a serious and apparently increasing public health problem yet relatively little is known about the types of allergy seen in routine tertiary practice, including their spatial distribution, co-occurrence or referral patterns. This study reviewed referrals over an eleven year period to a regional allergy clinic that had a well defined geographical boundary. For those patients confirmed as having an allergy we explored: (i) differences over time and by demographics, (ii) types of allergy, (iii) co-occurrence, and (iv) spatial distributions. Data were extracted from consultant letters to GPs, from September 1998 to September 2009, for patients confirmed as having an allergy. Other data included referral statistics and population data by postcode. Simple descriptive analysis was used to describe types of allergy. We calculated 11 year standardised morbidity ratios for postcode districts and checked for spatial clustering. We present maps showing 11 year rates by postcode, and 'difference' maps which try to separate referral effect from possible environmental effect. Of 5778 referrals, 961 patients were diagnosed with an allergy. These were referred by a total of 672 different GPs. There were marked differences in referral patterns between GP practices and also individual GPs. The mean age of patients was 35 and there were considerably more females (65%) than males. Airborne allergies were the most frequent (623), and there were very high rates of co-occurrence of pollen, house dust mite, and animal hair allergies. Less than half (410) patients had a food allergy, with nuts, fruit, and seafood being the most common allergens. Fifteen percent (142) had both a food and a non-food allergy. Certain food allergies were more likely to co-occur, for example, patients allergic to dairy products were more likely to be allergic to egg.There were age differences by types of allergy; people referred with food allergies were on average 5 years younger than those with other allergies, and those allergic to nuts were much younger (26 Vs 38) than those with other food allergies.There was clear evidence for spatial clustering with marked clustering around the referral hospital. However, the geographical distribution varied between allergies; airborne (particularly pollen allergies) clustered in North Dartmoor and Exmoor, food allergies (particularly nut allergies) in the South Hams, and on small numbers, some indication of seafood allergy in the far south west of Cornwall and in the Padstow area. This study shows marked geographical differences in allergy referrals which are likely to reflect a combination of environmental factors and GP referral patterns. The data suggest that GPs may benefit from education and ongoing decision support and be supported by public education on the nature of allergy. It suggests further research into what happens to patients with allergy where there has been low use of tertiary services and further research into cross-reactivity and co-occurrence, and spatial distribution of allergy.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2010 · BMC Public Health
Show more