Transplantation ethics from the Islamic point of view

Center for Study and Research of Medical Ethics, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, I.R. Iran.
Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research (Impact Factor: 1.43). 05/2005; 11(4):RA105-9.
Source: PubMed


Organ transplantation has been transformed from an experimental procedure at Western academic centers to an increasingly common procedure in private and public hospitals throughout the world. Attendant with advancements in organ harvesting, preservation, and transplantation come moral issues. Islam is a holistic religion that takes into account social affairs of man as well as spiritual ones. Islam has a long history of ethics literature including the subgenre of medical ethics. Historical considerations are discussed as to why Muslim thinkers were late to consider contemporary medical issues such as organ donation. Islam respects life and values the needs of the living over the dead, thus allowing organ donation to be considered in certain circumstances. The sources of Islamic law are discussed in brief in order for non-Muslims to appreciate how the parameters of organ transplantation are derived. The Islamic viewpoint, both Shiite and Sunni, is examined in relation to organ donation and its various sources. The advantages and disadvantages of brain dead and cadaveric donation is reviewed with technical and ethical considerations. The Islamic concept of brain death, informed and proxy consent are also discussed. We discuss the concept of rewarded donation as a way to alleviate the current shortage of organs available for transplantation and consider secular and religious support for such a program. Suggestions are made for greater discussion and exchange of ideas between secular and religious thinkers in the Islamic world and between the Islamic world and secular Western countries.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since 1993, government agencies in Japan have introduced a series of guidelines for gene therapy clinical trials. Appraisals of these guidelines were obtained from academic societies, institutional review boards (IRBs) of hospitals, and ethics committees (ECs) at medical schools nationwide. Using data from a large-scale national opinion survey, this study evaluates the experts' appraisals of the contents of these official guidelines in Japan and the process of their development. 26.3% of the respondents from academic societies and 39.3% of those from university ECs gave positive appraisals of the speediness of the decision process for the 1994 guidelines. Appraisals of speediness improved for the 2002 guidelines. Concerning the clarity of the 1994 guidelines, the proportion of positive appraisals was slightly smaller than negative appraisals among academic societies and hospital IRBs, though the majority of university ECs gave positive ratings. The 2002 guidelines were appraised significantly more positively than the 1994 guidelines. Information received after the decision was consistently rated better than the information before the decision. All groups reported that the opinions of patients and those of citizens were less adequately considered than were the opinions of experts. A majority of respondents rated information disclosure as important for future agendas. Clarity of the guidelines could be improved by revision. More information disclosure was considered desirable, especially information available before decisions are made. Incorporation of patients and citizens in policymaking is an important future goal.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2006 · Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Statements on issues in biomedical ethics, purporting to represent international interests, have been put forth by numerous groups. Most of these groups are composed of thinkers in the tradition of European secularism, and do not take into account the values of other ethical systems. One fifth of the world's population is accounted for by Islam, which is a universal religion, with more than 1400 years of scholarship. Although many values are held in common by secular ethical systems and Islam, their inferences are different. The question, "Is it possible to derive a truly universal declaration of biomedical ethics?" is discussed here by examining the value and extent of personal autonomy in Western and Islamic biomedical ethical constructs. These constructs are then tested vis-à-vis the issue of abortion. It is concluded that having a universal declaration of biomedical ethics in practice is not possible, although there are many conceptual similarities and agreements between secular and Islamic value systems, unless a radical paradigm shift occurs in segments of the world's deliberative bodies. The appellation "universal" should not be used on deliberative statements unless the ethical values of all major schools of thought are satisfied.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2007 · Journal of Medical Ethics
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There are more than 8 million refugees worldwide with the Middle East bearing the brunt. Socioeconomic factors are the major obstacles that refugees encounter when seeking health care in the host country. It, therefore, comes as no surprise that refugees are denied equal opportunities for one of the most sophisticated and expensive medical procedures in the world, kidney transplantation. With respect to transplantation, refugees are caught between a rock and a hard place: as recipients they have to single-handedly clear many hurdles on the arduous road to renal transplantation and as donors they are left unprotected against human organ trafficking. It should be the moral responsibility of the host country to provide this population with a support network. The ways and means of establishing this network should be defined locally; nevertheless, enabling refugees to receive a transplant is the most basic step, which should be followed by the provision of financial support and follow-up facilities in a concerted effort to ensure the continued function of the invaluable graft. It is also necessary that refugees be protected from being an organ reservoir on the black market. There are no precise regional or international data available on kidney transplantation in refugees; among the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation countries, only Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey have thus far provided data on their respective kidney transplantation regulations and models. Other countries in the region should follow suit and design models tailored to the local needs and conditions. What could, indubitably, be of enormous benefit in the long term is the establishment of an international committee on transplantation in refugees.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2007 · Transplantation Proceedings
Show more