Remission in depressed geriatric primary care patients: a report from the PROSPECT study. Am J Psychiatry 162: 718-724

Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, USA.
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 12.3). 04/2005; 162(4):718-24. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.718
Source: PubMed


This study compared time to first remission for elderly depressed patients in primary care for practices that implemented a care management model versus those providing usual care. In addition, it sought to identify risk factors for nonremission that could guide treatment planning and referral to care managers or specialists.
Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial (PROSPECT) data were analyzed. Participants were older patients (> or =60 years) selected following screening of 9,072 randomly identified primary care patients. The present analysis examined patients with major depression and a 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 18 or greater who were followed for at least 4 months (N=215). Primary care practices were randomly assigned to offer the PROSPECT intervention or usual care. The intervention consisted of services of trained care managers, who offered algorithm-based recommendations to physicians and helped patients with treatment adherence over 18 months.
First remission occurred earlier and was more common among patients receiving the intervention than among those receiving usual care. For all patients, limitations in physical and emotional functions predicted poor remission rate. Patients experiencing hopelessness were more likely to achieve remission if treated in intervention practices. Similarly, the intervention was more effective in patients with low baseline anxiety.
Longitudinal assessment of depression, hopelessness, anxiety, and physical and emotional functional limitations in depressed older primary care patients is critical. Patients with prominent symptoms or impairment in these areas may be candidates for care management or mental health care, since they are at risk for remaining depressed and disabled.

  • Source
    • "IMPACT (Unutzer et al, 20,21 2001, 2002) 1801 Step 1: AD (typically an SSRI) or PST (8–12 wk) Step 2: Nonresponse: switch to other AD or PST Partial response: combine with other AD or PST Step 3: Combine AD and PST Consider ECT or other specialty services Rate of response (50% reduction in depression score) after 12 mo: Intervention: 45% Usual care: 19% PROSPECT (Mulsant et al, 22 2001; Bruce et al, 23 2004; Alexopoulos et al, 24,25 2005, 2009) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The broadening use of antidepressants among older Americans has not been associated with a notable decrease in the burden of geriatric depression. This article, based on a selective review of the literature, explores several explanations for this paradox. The authors propose that the effectiveness of antidepressants depends in large part on the way they are used. Evidence supports that antidepressant pharmacotherapy leads to better outcomes when guided by a treatment algorithm as opposed to attempting to individualize treatment. Several published guidelines and pharmacotherapy algorithms developed for the treatment of geriatric depression are reviewed, and an updated algorithm proposed.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2014 · Clinics in Geriatric Medicine
  • Source
    • "These findings underscore the importance of screening for suicidal risk and depression, at the primary care level. A number of collaborative steppedcare management programmes targeting older primary care clients with chronic physical illness using algorithm-driven treatment of depression have shown that suicide ideation is sustainably reduced among the participants after completion of the programme, in addition to effective treatment of depression, for instance, the Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial (PROSPECT) (Alexopoulos et al., 2005, 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In most nations of the world, the risk of suicide increases with age, particularly for older men (WHO, 2011). The magnitude of this global public health challenge will escalate rapidly with the anticipated worldwide burgeoning of the older population. By 2020, the population aged over 60 is estimated to expand to over 1 billion, 70% of whom dwell in developing countries (United Nations, 2009). Another factor highlighted by some researchers is the cohort effect from baby-boomers, who may have a higher rate of suicide than their predecessors entering old age after the first decade of the millennium (Conwell et al., 2002a; Phillips et al., 2010). In this book chapter, we first examine the scope of the problem and, from a public health perspective, address the risk and protective factors related to suicidal behaviours in late life, upon which evidence-based prevention and intervention (‘postvention’) measures might be mounted at accessible points along the suicide trajectory (Conwell et al., 2011). We review the available studies that have looked at possibilities for prevention of suicide in older people around the world.
    Full-text · Chapter · Sep 2013
  • Source
    • "The disorder leads to negative consequences such as a poor quality of life, impairment in the activities of daily living, impaired cognition and increased risk of death (Barca et al., 2010, 2011a; Bergdahl et al., 2005; Lyketsos et al., 2003). It can be successfully treated with drugs or non-drug interventions , and it is therefore important to detect depression in elderly patients (Alexopoulos et al., 2005; Reynolds et al., 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aims of the study were to examine the validity of the MADRS and to compare it with the validity of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD). We included 140 patients without dementia, with mean age 81.5 (sd 7.7) years. Trained psychiatric nurses interviewed all of them using the MADRS. In addition, for 70 patients caregivers were interviewed using the CSDD. A psychiatrist who had no access to the MADRS or the CSDD results made a diagnosis of depression according to the DSM-IV criteria for major depression, and the ICD-10 criteria was also applied for the 70 patients assessed with the CSDD. Twenty-two out of the 140 had depression according to the DSM IV criteria, whereas 25 out of 70 had depression according to the ICD-10 criteria. The area under the curve (auc) in a receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.93) for the MADRS using the DSM-IV criteria. The best cut-off point was 16/17 with sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.82. The AUC for the CSDD was 0.83 (95% CI 0.71-0.95). The recommended cut-off score on the CSDD of 7/8 was valid but not the best in this study. The patients were diagnosed with a diagnosis of depression by only one psychiatrist, and the procedures in the two centres were not exactly the same. The MADRS has good discriminating power to detect depression in elderly persons and should be preferred to the CSDD for use with persons without dementia.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2012 · Journal of Affective Disorders
Show more