ArticlePDF Available

Bite club: Comparative bite force in big biting mammals and the prediction of predatory behaviour in fossil taxa

The Royal Society
Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

We provide the first predictions of bite force (BS) in a wide sample of living and fossil mammalian predators. To compare between taxa, we calculated an estimated bite force quotient (BFQ) as the residual of BS regressed on body mass. Estimated BS adjusted for body mass was higher for marsupials than placentals and the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) had the highest relative BS among extant taxa. The highest overall BS was in two extinct marsupial lions. BFQ in hyaenas were similar to those of related, non-osteophagous taxa challenging the common assumption that osteophagy necessitates extreme jaw muscle forces. High BFQ in living carnivores was associated with greater maximal prey size and hypercarnivory. For fossil taxa anatomically similar to living relatives, BFQ can be directly compared, and high values in the dire wolf (Canis dirus) and thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus) suggest that they took relatively large prey. Direct inference may not be appropriate where morphologies depart widely from biomechanical models evident in living predators and must be considered together with evidence from other morphological indicators. Relatively low BFQ values in two extinct carnivores with morphologies not represented among extant species, the sabrecat, Smilodon fatalis, and marsupial sabretooth, Thylacosmilus atrox, support arguments that their killing techniques also differed from extant species and are consistent with 'canine-shear bite' and 'stabbing' models, respectively. Extremely high BFQ in the marsupial lion, Thylacoleo carnifex, indicates that it filled a large-prey hunting niche.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Bite club: comparative bite force in big biting
mammals and the prediction of predatory
behaviour in fossil taxa
Stephen Wroe
1,
*
, Colin McHenry
2
and Jeffrey Thomason
3
1
School of Biological Sciences (A08), University of Sydney, NSW, Australia 2006
2
School of Environmental and Life Sciences (Earth Sciences), University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia 2308
3
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
We provide the first predictions of bite force (B
S
) in a wide sample of living and fossil mammalian
predators. To compare between taxa, we calculated an estimated bite force quotient (BFQ) as the residual
of B
S
regressed on body mass. Estimated B
S
adjusted for body mass was higher for marsupials than
placentals and the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) had the highest relative B
S
among extant taxa. The
highest overall B
S
was in two extinct marsupial lions. BFQ in hyaenas were similar to those of related, non-
osteophagous taxa challenging the common assumption that osteophagy necessitates extreme jaw muscle
forces. High BFQ in living carnivores was associated with greater maximal prey size and hypercarnivory.
For fossil taxa anatomically similar to living relatives, BFQ can be directly compared, and high values in the
dire wolf (Canis dirus) and thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus) suggest that they took relatively large prey.
Direct inference may not be appropriate where morphologies depart widely from biomechanical models
evident in living predators and must be considered together with evidence from other morphological
indicators. Relatively low BFQ values in two extinct carnivores with morphologies not represented among
extant species, the sabrecat, Smilodon fatalis, and marsupial sabretooth, Thylacosmilus atrox, support
arguments that their killing techniques also differed from extant species and are consistent with ‘canine-
shear bite’ and ‘stabbing’ models, respectively. Extremely high BFQ in the marsupial lion, Thylacoleo
carnifex, indicates that it filled a large-prey hunting niche.
Keywords: bite force; prey size; osteophagy; Carnivora; Dasyuromorphia; Thylacoleonidae
1. INTRODUCTION
Bite force (B
S
) is an important aspect of carnivore ecology,
with the potential to shed light on the evolution of
community structure and prey size in fossil taxa (Meers
2002; Vizcaı
´
no & de Iuliis 2003; Rayfield 2004). However,
empirical data are not easily obtained; B
S
has been
measured in only three mammalian carnivore species
(Thomason 1991; Dessem & Druzinsky 1992; Binder &
Van Valkenburgh 2000) and the comparative biology of B
S
in mammals has remained largely unexplored. Important
unanswered questions are: is bite force (i) allometrically
related to body mass, (ii) phylogenetically constrained,
(iii) more strongly influenced by skull length or skull
width, (iv) relatively higher in bone-cracking specialists
and (v) related to prey size in extant taxa? Answers will
define the limits of using B
S
estimate as a predictor of
behaviour and prey size in fossil species.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
We calculated theoretical maximum bite forces using the ‘dry
skull’ method (Thomason 1 991; Electronic Appendices,
sections A and B). Our sample comprised 49 specimens
representing 39 taxa (31 extant and eight extinct). The dry
skull method, derived from relationships between skull
dimensions and jaw muscle cross-sectional areas, models the
jaw as a simple lever. It is most applicable to the anterior-most
portion of the jaw, where the caniniform teeth are located
(Electronic Appendix, section A). Consequently, and
because morphology of the canines has long been considered
a significant predictor of predatory behaviour in mammalian
carnivores (Wroe et al. 1998; Farlow & Pianka 2002), we
have largely restricted our discussion to estimates of force for
static bites at the canines (CB
S
). However, analyses of B
S
at
the carnassial showed the same qualitative trends as for CB
S
(Electronic Appendix, section C). A further advantage of the
‘dry skull’ method is that because results are derived solely
from skull morphology, comparisons can be made between
fossil and extant taxa.
The relationship between CB
S
and body mass between
species is allometri c (figure 1; Meers 2002; r
2
Z0.85). To
compare bite forces in taxa of greatly differing body masses an
estimated bite force quotient (BFQ) was calculated using the
residuals of regression (table 1; Electronic Appendix, section
A). ‘Average’ BFQ was set at 100. Variance in allometry
adjusted bite force is small relative to that for absolute B
S
(Thomason 1991; Electronic Appendix, section D) and a
second advantage of using BFQ is that it allows more
meaningful comparisons based on small datasets. This quality
is particularly valuable in analyses incorporating fossil taxa
where sample sizes are limited.
3. RESULTS
The highest B
S
estimate adjusted for body mass were
Proc. R. Soc. B
doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2986
Published online
* Author for correspondence (swroe@bio.usyd.edu.au).
Received 28 July 2004
Accepted 16 October 2004
1 q 2005 The Royal Society
in two extinct marsupial lions, Thylacoleo carnifex (194)
and Priscileo roskellyae (196). The lowest was also in a fossil
marsupial, Thylacosmilus atrox (41). Among extant carni-
vorous mammals the highest BFQ was in the Tasmanian
devil, Sarcophilus harrisii (181). For placentals, BFQ was
greatest in the Pleistocene dire wolf, Canis dirus (163).
Another canid, the African hunting dog, Lycaon pictus, had
the highest BFQ for living Carnivora (142).
Mean BFQ was higher in marsupials than placentals
(158 versus 98), although marsupials do not have larger
heads—relationships between head lengths and body
masses in dasyuromorphians were similar to those of
canids, and thylacoleonids were similar to felids (figure 2).
However, relative to body mass, CB
S
was significantly
higher in dasyuromorphians than in canids (F
1,13
Z33.51,
p!0.01) and significantly higher in thylacoleonids than in
cats (F
1,11
Z11.84, p!0.01).
The average BFQ for Felidae (104) was slightly less
than in Canidae (110) and dogs had greater head to body
size (figure 2), but the difference in this instance was not
significant. Across all taxa, skull width was a better
predictor of CB
S
than skull length (r
2
Z0.92 and 0.78,
respectively; Thomason 1991).
CB
S
was considerable for specialist bone-crackers
included in our study, the spotted and brown hyaenas
(Crocuta crocuta and Hyaena hyaena) and the Tasmanian
devil (S. harrisii). However, in the two hyaenids, BFQ at
the canine was exceeded by several non-osteophagous
carnivorans (figure 1; table 1) and BFQ for the Tasmanian
devil was not much above average for dasyuromorphians
and less than in two marsupial lions. BFQ at the carnassial
teeth followed a similar pattern (Electronic Appendix,
section C), an expected result because the position of the
carnassial varies little among mammalian predators
(Greaves 1983).
As an upper restriction on niche, a predator’s maximal
prey size is an important component of its ecology and is
likely to be strongly influenced by its biomechanical limits.
Predator body mass has been shown to correlate with
maximal prey size in mammals (Meers 2002).
Amo ng extant canids, the four hypercarnivores that
often prey on animals larger than themselves, the grey
wolf (Canis lupus lupus), dingo (C. l. dingo), African
hunting dog (L. pictus) and the dhole (Canis alpinus), have
the highest BFQ (108–142). BFQ was consistently lower
in the five more solitary, omnivorous foxes, jackals and
coyote characterized by relatively low maximal prey sizes
(80–97). Thus, although the ability to bring down large
prey in canids is related to cooperative hunting, it is still
reflected in a higher BFQ. Within living Felidae, BFQ
values were 57 and 75 for the two species that specialize in
relatively small prey, while BFQ was 94 or greater for the
seven known to take relatively la rge prey (table 2).
B
S
adjusted for body mass was also low in bears
(44–78), which are restricted to relatively small prey
(Meers 2002). BFQ was higher in extant dasyuromor-
phian marsupials, but the same trends were evident. The
lowest BFQ was in the eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus),
which takes comparatively smaller p rey and is less
carnivorous than the other marsupials considered (see
below). Overall, BFQ was 100 or higher in 15 of the 16
extant placental and marsupial carnivores sampled that
take prey larger than their own maximal body masses. In
12 of the 14 extant species where maximal prey size was
less than the species’ mean body mass, BFQ was less than
100 (table 2). The difference between large and small prey
specialists was significant (t(28)ZK4.92, p!0.01) and
hypercarnivores had significantly higher values for
BFQ than more o mnivorous species (t(28)ZK3.33,
p!0.02; table 2).
4. DISCUSSION
(a) Comparisons between extant taxa
Results suggest that, relative to body mass, calculated
canine B
S
is considerably higher in marsupials than in
Th.c
Sm.f
Cr.c
C.l.l
S.h
D.m
C.l.d
C.la
T.c
V.v
P.l
L.p
F.c
P.o
Thy.a
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
log10 BoM (kg)
log10 CBs (N)
F.s
+
Figure 1. Log predicted canine bite force (CB
S
) plotted against log body mass (BoM). Reg ression for all extant taxa Z solid
black line. Individual data points are: for felids (open triangles), canids (grey filled triangles), dasyuromorphians, grey filled
squares, thylacoleonids (black filled squares), hyaenids (grey filled diamonds), ursids, a mustelid and a viverrid (g rey crosses),
and a thylacosmilid (open squares). Species abbreviations as in table 1.
2 S. Wroe and others Bite force and predatory behaviour
Proc. R. Soc. B
placentals and this cannot simply be explained by
differences in head size. The presence of the superfast
myosin isoform in both carnivorans and dasyuromor-
phians suggests that their muscle microphysiology is
similar (Hoh et al. 2001). Differences between these two
groups may relate to brain volumes, which, in carnivor-
ans, are around two and a half times that of marsupial
carnivores (Wroe et al. 2003). Within the temporal
region of the skull, cross-sectional area places limits on
the maximal force that can be generated by muscle
(Thomason 1991), and expansion of brain volume
impinges on available muscle area within the zygoma.
Consequently, within a skull of given length and width,
greater brain size impinges on maximal B
S
. Extant
carnivorans may have more precisely targeted killing
behaviours than marsupial counterparts (Ewer 1969)
and through greater efficiency may be able to accom-
plish similar results with less B
S
. Because mean BFQ in
marsupials is much high er than in placentals, our
finding that the relatively omnivorous D. viverrinus has
a BFQ well within the range of hypercarnivorous
placentals is consistent with this interpretation. If in
vivo testing shows that placentals produce bite
forces that are similar, after adjustment for body mass,
to marsupials, it will probably be a result of differences
in jaw muscle anatomy, such as muscle pennation or
microphysiology, although none have been clearly
identified to date.
Mean BFQ was lower in cats than canids, reflecting the
smaller head size of cats relative to body mass, but relative
to skull length, CB
S
in felids was greater, possibly because
of their greater skull width relative to length (Electronic
Appendices, sections E and F). Although extant canids
and dasyuromorphians have higher mean BFQ than felids,
the shorter skull of cats may confer greater resistance to
forces produced by struggling prey. Cats also have more
powerful, flexible forelimbs, of critical utility in violent,
close quarter interactions and may recruit ventral cervical
Table 1. Measurements of basal skull length (BSL) and maximum skull width at the zygoma (SWZ); and estimates of body mass
(BoM), canine bite force (CB
S
), and bite force quotient (BFQ), for 39 taxa of recent and fossil mammals.
(Measurements and calculations were taken from prepared skulls. Methods for body mass estimations given in Electronic
Appendix, section A. Fossil taxa indicated with †.)
species family BSL (cm) SWZ (cm) BoM (kg) CB
S
(N) BFQ
Alopex lagopus Canidae 13.86 8.05 8.2 178 97
Canis alpinus Canidae 17.69 10.78 16.5 314 112
Canis aureus Canidae 13.53 8.12 7.7 165 94
Canis lupus dingo (C l.d) Canidae 18.04 9.97 17.5 313 108
Canis lupus hallstromi Canidae 15.95 9.41 12.3 235 100
Lycaon pictus (L.p) Canidae 18.52 13.18 18.9 428 142
Vulpes vulpes (V.v) Canidae 13.79 7.35 8.1 164 92
Urocyon cineroargentus Canidae 11.91 6.14 5.3 114 80
Canis latrans (C.la) Canidae 18.85 9.86 19.8 275 88
Canis lupus lupus (C.l.l) Canidae 22.92 13.22 34.7 593 136
Canis dirus Canidae 26.19 17.58 50.8 893 163
Ursus americanus Ursidae 24.39 17.2 105.2 541 64
Ursus arctos Ursidae 26.96 16.28 128.8 751 78
Ursus thibetanus Ursidae 20.92 11.07 77.2 312 44
Meles meles Mustelidae 12.31 8.05 11.4 244 109
Gennetta tigrinus Viverridae 10.93 5.19 6.2 73 48
Crocuta crocuta (Cr.c) Hyaenidae 23.64 16.73 69.1 773 117
Hyaena hyaena Hyaenidae 19.98 15.18 40.8 545 113
Proteles cristatus Hyaenidae 12.46 7.22 9.3 151 77
Panthera onca (P. o ) Felidae 22.25 18.63 83.2 1014 137
Panthera tig ris Felidae 28.86 22.73 186.9 1525 127
Acinonyx jubatus Felidae 15.93 12.30 29.5 472 119
Felis yagouaroundi Felidae 10.09 6.94 7.1 127 75
Lynx rufus Felidae 7.58 5.93 2.9 98 100
Felis concolor (F. c ) Felidae 16.77 12.92 34.5 472 108
Felis sylvestris (F. s ) Felidae 7.51 5.39 2.8 56 58
Neofelis nebulosa Felidae 16.74 11.88 34.4 595 137
Panthera leo (P. l ) Felidae 33.41 24.81 294.6 1768 112
Panthera pardus Felidae 18.01 13.02 43.1 467 94
Smilodon fatalis †(Sm.f) Felidae 29.48 19.53 199.6 976 78
Dasyurus maculatus (D.m) Dasyuridae 10.09 6.01 3.0 153 179
Dasyurus viverrinus Dasyuridae 7.27 4.15 0.87 65 137
Sarcophilus harrisii (S.h) Dasyuridae 13.96 11.17 12.0 418 181
Nimbacinus dicksoni Thylacinidae 13.24 8.08 5.3 267 189
Thylacinus cynocephalus (T. c) Thylacinidae 25.04 14.83 41.7 808 166
Priscileo roskellyae Thylacoleonidae 8.34 6.34 2.7 184 196
Wakaleo vanderleurei Thylacoleonidae 18.53 12.58 41.4 673 139
Thylacoleo carnifex †(Th.c) Thylacoleonidae 24.04 20.15 109.4 1692 194
Thylacosmilus atrox †(Thy.a ) Thylacosmilidae 257.71 139.65 106 353 41
Bite force and predatory behaviour S. Wroe and others 3
Proc. R. Soc. B
musculature to assist in jaw closure (Van Valkenburgh
et al. 2003; Anto
´
n et al. 2004).
(b) Bite force and osteophagy
Our finding that BFQ at both the canine and carnassial in
osteophages were often comparable to, and sometimes less
than, many non-osteophagous relatives was unexpected.
This may have important implications re garding the
biomechanics of osteophagy.
In most carnivores, maximal bite forces are used in the
killing bite at the canines where maximal loads will be
distributed between adjacent teeth in the anterior region of
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 10 100 1000
BoM (kg)
BSL (cm)
Figure 2. Basal skull length (BSL) plotted against body mass (BoM). Power regressions are shown for felids (black dashed line),
canids (grey solid line), dasyuromorphians (grey dashed line), thylacoleonids (black solid line). Symbols as in figure 1.
Table 2. Bite force adjusted for body mass allometry (BFQ), maximal prey size and feeding category in 31 extant mammalian
carnivores.
(RMPS, maximal prey size (1, greater than maximal body mass of predator; 2, less than maximal body mass of predator); FC,
feeding category (1, hypercarnivore; 2, other); ‘—’, insufficient data. Maximal body mass data largely from Meers (2002).For
additional data see Electronic Appendix, section A.)
species common name family BFQ RMPS FC
Alopex lagopus Arctic fox Canidae 97 2 2
Canis alpinus Dhole Canidae 112 1 1
Canis aureus golden jackal Canidae 94 2 2
Urocyon cineroargentus grey fox Canidae 80 2 2
Canis lupus dingo Dingo Canidae 108 1 2
Canis lupus hallstromi singing dog Canidae 100
Lycaon pictus African hunting dog Canidae 142 1 1
Vulpes vulpes red fox Canidae 92 2 2
Canis latrans Coyote Canidae 88 2 2
Canis lupus lupus grey wolf Canidae 136 1 1
Ursus americanus black bear Ursidae 64 2 2
Ursus arctos brown bear Ursidae 78 2 2
Ursus thibetanus Asiatic bear Ursidae 44 2 2
Gennetta tigrinus striped genet Viverridae 48 2 2
Meles meles European badger Mustelidae 109 2 2
Crocuta crocuta spotted hyaena Hyaenidae 117 1 1
Hyaena hyaena brown hyaena Hyaenidae 113 1 1
Proteles cristatus Aardwolf Hyaenidae 77 2 2
Panthera onca jaguar Felidae 137 1 1
Panthera tigris tiger Felidae 127 1 1
Felis concolor cougar Felidae 108 1 1
Acinonyx jubatus cheetah Felidae 119 1 1
Felis yagouaroundi jaguarundi Felidae 75 2 1
Lynx rufus bobcat Felidae 100 1 1
Felis sylvestris catus cat Felidae 58 2 1
Neofelis nebulosa clouded leopard Felidae 137 1 1
Panthera leo lion Felidae 112 1 1
Panthera pardus leopard Felidae 94 1 1
Dasyurus maculatus spotted-tailed quoll Dasyuridae 179 1 1
Dasyurus viverrinus eastern quoll Dasyuridae 137 2 2
Sarcophilus harrisii Tasmanian devil Dasyuridae 181 1 1
4 S. Wroe and others Bite force and predatory behaviour
Proc. R. Soc. B
the jaw. In contrast, osteophagy requires the concentration
of high loads on a limited part of the food item in order to
produce material failure. The highest bite forces are
typically achievable in carnassial biting, which is restricted
to one side of the mandible rather than distributed between
left and right jaws (Greaves 1983). In hyaenids, maximum
forces may be generated immediat ely anterior to the
carnassial (Werdelin 1989). Moreover, from observation,
osteophages may use kinetic, rather than static bites to
crack bones, fur ther increasing loads. Consequently,
theoretical forces that can be achieved are far greater than
those experienced during a canine bite. The application of
maximal bite forces at post-canine teeth on hard materials
requires very robust dentitions, as evidenced in specialized
bone-crackers such C. crocuta, H. hyaena and S. harrisii.
Our results suggest that although the capacity of teeth (and
probably crania) to resist high stresses on hard substances in
the cheek–tooth row is an essential adaptation to specialized
osteophagy in mammals, particularly high bite strength
relative to body size is not. The flipside of this argument is
that many felids and canids could theoretically apply
relatively greater bite forces at a single point in the cheek–
tooth row than could a same-sized hyaenid. However, we
posit that in practice, non-osteophageous taxa will not
voluntarily develop maximal bite forces in a post-canine
bite because neither their dentitia nor their crania are
optimized to resist such high stresses in this region. Unused
capacity at the carnassial in non-osteophages may be an
incidental product of the requirement for high B
S
at the
canines as part of their killing strategy.
(c) Bite force and the prediction of feeding ecology
(i) Extant carnivores
Our results demonstrate that among living mammalian
carnivores, BFQ is a broad indicator of relative prey size
and feeding ecology. However, considered in isolation, B
S
adjusted for body mass is not an infallible predictor. In
the aardwolf (Proteles cristatus), BFQ is low (77), but
higher than in some bears, a viverr id and two small cat
species (table 2). Although this finding is consistent in
that all take relatively small prey, it does not reflect the
fact that P. cristatus subsists largely on termites. Interest-
ingly, the unusual, hypotrophied post-canine morphology
of the aardwolf unambiguously suggests that vertebrates
are rarely taken, but the canines are quite well developed.
Together with moderate BFQ, this indicates that it is
physically capable of killing much larger prey than it does.
The retention of functional canines and moderate BFQ
in P. cristatus may be related to intra and/or interspecific
defence. Either way, the aardwolf clearly lies outside
generalized biomechanical subcategories, such as the cat
and dog types, which themselves differ in details
including head shape, canine cross-sectional mor-
phologies and killing behaviour. This example demon-
strates well that BFQ may not directly reflect feeding
ecology for morphologically atypical taxa that do not fit
within generalized biomechanical models. Consequently,
in the reconstruction of ecology for fossil carnivores,
BFQ must be qualified against the type and extent
of morphological departure from biomechanical sub-
categories observable in living species. For example,
predictions incorporating BFQ for fossil cats, or taxa with
cat-like morphologies, are best made on the basis of
comparisons with extant felids.
(ii) Extinct taxa with morphologically similar
extant relatives
Neither cranial, nor post-cranial morphology of the
thylac ine, Thylacinus cynocephalus, differ greatly from
those of living dasyuromorphians (Wroe 2003). Based
on low rates of canine tooth breakage and snout
morphology, it has been argued that thylacines may have
been restricted to small or medium sized prey (Jones 2003;
Johnson & Wroe 2003). Our finding that BFQ was
comparable to extant dasyuromor phians known t o
take relatively large prey is contra these interpretations
(table 1). Similarly, high BFQ in the Miocene thylacinid,
Nimbacinus dicksoni, suggests that relatively large prey
were accessible to this anatomically conservative species.
Likewise, among fossil placentals, morphology of the
dire wolf (C. dirus) is similar to that of living relatives. If
C. dirus was a social hunter, then its high BFQ (163)
relative to extant canids su ggests that it preyed on
relatively large animals.
(iii) Extinct taxa without morphologically similar
living relatives
Some fossil taxa included in our analyses clearly fell well
outside extant morphotypes. Major differences between
the sabrecat Smilodon fatalis and all extant felids,
including extreme hypertr ophy of the canine s, very
powerful forelimbs, lengthening of the neck and short-
ening of the lumbar region, leave little doubt that it used
killing techniques not represented among living carni-
vores and regularly took large prey (Janis 1994; Anto
´
n&
Galobar t 1999; Anto
´
n et al. 2004; Argot 2004).
Notwithstanding its high absolute CB
S
compared with
large living felids, BFQ in S. fatalis was low (78). Having
secured large prey with its muscular forelimbs, S. fatalis
used its hypertrophied canines to effect fatal trauma
(Anto
´
n et al. 2004; Argot 2004). The reduced cross-
sectional area of the canines in sabrecats may require
relatively less bite force than that used by living Panthera
(M. Meers, personal communication). In the marsupial
sabretooth, T. atrox, both BFQ (41) and absolute B
S
were
extremely low, but as with S. fatalis,post-cranial
adaptations and canine morphology indicate a killing
technique without present day analogy and systematic
predation on relatively large taxa (Argot 2004).
Current functional models of sabretooth killing be-
haviour include: (i) the ‘stabbing’ model in which the
force applied to the canines is primarily neck-driven
(Anto
´
n & Galobart 1999; Argot 2004) and (ii) a ‘canine-
shear bite’, in which significant absolute force is required
of the jaw adductors in conjunction with input from neck
muscles (Akersten 1985). Because absolute CB
S
in
S. fatalis is high, and BFQ is considerably higher than
in T. atrox, our results are consistent with the ‘canine
shear-bite’ model for the sabrecat, with significant force
required of the jaw adductors in conjunction with cervical
musculature. From estimates of bending strength in the
mandibular cor pus, Bickne vicus & Van Valkenburgh
(1996) posit that S. fatalis may have applied a sustained
throat clamping bite. Our results do not rule out
this possibility, but are contra the conclusion that bite
Bite force and predatory behaviour S. Wroe and others 5
Proc. R. Soc. B
force in S. fatalis was comparable to that of similar sized
pantherines. However, in the marsupial sabretooth, CB
S
and BFQ are both so low that we consider our result
supportive of a primarily neck-driven use of the canines
and strongly contra the possibility that T. atrox applied a
sustained throat bite to dispatch large prey.
For the marsupial lion, T. carnifex, BFQ was the highest
of any large predator and its CB
S
approached that of a lion
(Panthera leo ) more than twice its size (table 1). If the
killing mechanism of T. carnifex was functionally equival-
ent to that of extant felids, our results suggest that it could
take prey much larger than itself. However, although cat-
like in many respects, its dentition is unusual and
interpretation of feeding ecology in the marsupial lion
has long attracted controversy (Wells et al. 1982; Wroe et
al. 2004a). Our findings confirm that short outlever arms
and anteriorly placed muscle resultants conferred high
mechanical efficiency (Wells et al. 1982). The marsupial
lion’s vertical shearing ‘carnassial’ cheek–teeth are rela-
tively larger than in any other mammalian carnivore (Wells
et al. 1982; Werdelin 1988). Brought together with a very
high B
S
, these carnassials may have enabled T. carnifex to
rapidly slice through tracheas or vital blood vessels and
quickly dispatch large, potentially dangerous prey,
although mechanical simulation will be required to
confirm this. When CB
S
and BFQ are considered together
with forelimb, cervical and lumbar morphology that
converges on that of marsupial and placental sabretooths,
as well as taphonomic data (Janis 1994; Wroe 2003; Argot
2004), the marsupial lion may have been capable of taking
sub-adults of the heaviest available prey (Wroe et al.
2004b).
5. CONCLUSIONS
The dry skull method, because it takes into account subtle
changes in the shape of the skull and jaws, provides
estimates of B
S
that can be applied across unrelated taxa
and thus allows quantitative comparisons of this import-
ant component of a predator’s biomechanical perform-
ance. Adjusted for body mass, our estimates of B
S
(i) show
variations that are broadly consistent with patterns of
predatory behaviour and diet obser ved in extant carni-
vores, (ii) provide a basis for predicting maximal prey size
in extinct mammalian predators that are morpholog ically
similar to extant predators, (iii) allow quantifiable
comparisons of biomechanics within ecomorphs, where
there are no living analogues, such as sabretooths and (iv)
challenge the widely held assumption that osteophagy
requires relatively higher B
S
than that seen in non-
osteophagous relatives. Mechanical simulations a nd
further investigations of jaw muscle anatomies and the
mechanics of the skull, using FEA modelling (Daniel &
McHenr y 2001; Snively & Russell 2002; Rayfield 2004)
and in vivo force measurement, will fur ther clarify these
patterns and permit examination of the following predic-
tions inferred from our analyses: (i) the biomechanics of
osteophagy are more tightly constrained by the structural
properties of the carnivore’s skull and dentition than by
muscle force, (ii) non-osteophagous large prey specialists
should be reluctant to apply all available muscle force in a
post-canine bite, because of the threat of material failure
(moreover, their crania will be optimized to resist stress
at the canines, while in specialist bone-crackers skulls will
be optimized to resist stress near the carnassial) and (iii) if
in vivo testing shows that placentals produce bite forces
that are similar after allometric adjustment to marsupials,
it will be because of differences in muscle anatomy and
organization.
We are much indebted to M. Meers, J. Farlow, A. Herrel,
G. Erickson, B. Van Valkenburgh, L. Werdelin, E. Rayfield,
E. Snively, D. Hu ber, C. Vineyard, M. Crowther,
P. Christiansen and M. Jones for advice on previous versions
and the provision of unpublished data. We also thank
D. Wroe, P. Adam, P. Clausen, I. Johnston, S. Johnston,
D. Hochuli and K. Wyatt. Work was funded by a University of
Sydney Research Fellowship (to S.W.).
REFERENCES
Akersten, W. A. 1985 Canine function in Smilodon
(Mammalia: Felidae: Machairodontinae). Contrib. Sci.
Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles County 356, 1–22.
Anto
´
n, M. & Galobart, A
´
. 1999 Neck function and predatory
behaviour in the scimitar toothed cat Homotherium latidens
(Owen). J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 19, 771–784.
Anto
´
n, M., Salesa, M. J., Pastor, J. F., Sanchez, I. M., Fraile,
S. & Morales, J. 2004 Implications of the mastoid anatomy
for larger extant felids for the evolution and predator y
behaviour of sabretoothed cats (Mammalia, Carnivora,
Felidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 140, 207–221.
Argot, C. 2004 Functional adaptive features of the postcranial
skeleton of a sabertooth borhyaenoid, Thylacosmilus atrox
(Metatheria), and palaeobiologic implications. Alcheringa
28, 229–266.
Bicknevicus, A. R. & Van Valkenburgh, B. 1996 Design for
killing: craniodental adaptations of predators. In Carnivore
behavior, ecology and evolution, vol. 2 (ed. J. L. Gittleman)
pp. 393–428. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Binder, W. J. & Van Valkenburgh, B. 2000 Development of
bite strength and feeding behaviour in juvenile spotted
hyena (Crocuta crocuta). J. Zool. Lond. 252, 273–283.
Daniel, W. J. T. & McHenry, C. 2001 Bite force to skull stress
correlation—modelling the skull of Alligator mississippiensis.
In Crocodilian biology and evolution (ed. G. C. Grigg,
F. Seebacher & C. E. Franklin), pp. 135–143. Chipping
Norton: Surrey Beatty.
Dessem, D. & Druzinsky, R. E. 1992 Jaw-muscle activity in
ferrets (Mustela putorius furo). J. Morphol. 213, 275–286.
Ewer, R. F. 1969 Some observations on the killing and eating of
prey by two dasyurid mar supials: the Mulgara, Dasycercus
cristicauda, and the Tasmanian devil, Sarcophilus harrisii. Z.
Tierpsychol. 26, 23–38.
Farlow, J. O. & Pianka, J. R. 2002 Body size overlap, habitat
partitioning and living space requirements of terrestrial
vertebrate predators: implications for the palaeoecology of
large theropod dinosaurs. Hist. Biol. 16, 21–40.
Greaves, W. S. 1983 A functional analysis of carnassial biting.
Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 20, 353–363.
Hoh, J. F. Y., Lim, J. H. Y., Kang, L. D. H. & Lucas, C. A.
2001 Expression of superfast myosin in the jaw-closing
muscles of Crocodylus porosus.InCrocodilian biology and
evolution (ed. G. C. Grigg, F. Seebacher & C. E. Franklin),
pp. 156–164. Chipping Norton, NSW: Surrey Beatty.
Janis, C. M. 1994 The sabertooth’s repeat performances.
Nat. Hist. 103, 78–83.
Johnson, C. & Wroe, S. 2003 Causes of extinctions of
vertebrates during the Holocene of mainland Australia:
arrival of the dingo or human impact? Holocene
13, 109–116.
6 S. Wroe and others Bite force and predatory behaviour
Proc. R. Soc. B
Jones, M. E. 2003 Convergence in ecomorphology and
guild structure among marsupial and placental carnivores.
In Predators with pouches: the biology of carnivorous
marsupials (ed. M. Jones, C. Dickman & M. Archer),
pp. 285–296. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
Meers, M. B. 2002 Maximum bite force and prey size of
Tyrannosaurus rex and their relationships to the inference
of feeding behaviour. Hist. Biol. 16, 1–12.
Rayfield, E. J. 2004 Cranial mechanics and feeding
in Tyrannosaurus rex. Proc. R. Soc. B 271, 1451–1459.
(doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2755.)
Snively, E. & Russell, A. 2002 The tyrannosaurid metatarsus:
bone strain and inferred ligament function. Senck. Lethaea
82, 35–42.
Thomason, J. J. 1991 Cranial strength in relation to
estimated biting forces in some mammals. Can. J. Zool.
69, 2326–2333.
Van Valkenburgh, B., Sacco, T. & Wang, X. 2003 Pack
hunting in Miocene borophagine dogs: evidence from
craniodental morphology and body size. Bull. Am. Mus.
Nat. Hist. 279, 147–162.
Vizcaı
´
no, S. F. & de Iuliis, G. 2003 Evidence for advanced
carnivory in fossil armadillos (Mammalia Xenarthra,
Dasypodidae). Paleobiology 29, 123–1388.
Wells, R. T., Horton, D. R. & Rogers, P. 1982 Thylacoleo
carnifex Owen (Thylacoleonidae): marsupial carnivore? In
Carnivorous marsupials (ed. M. Archer), pp. 573–586.
Sydney: Royal Zoological Society of NSW.
Werdelin, L. 1988 Circumventing a constraint: the case of
Thylacoleo carnifex (Marsupialia: Thylacoleonidae). Aust.
J. Zool. 36, 565–571.
Werdelin, L. 1989 Constraint and adaptation in the bone-
cracking canid Osteoborus (Mammalia: Canidae). Paleo-
biology 15, 387–401.
Wroe, S. 2003 Australian marsupial carnivores: an over view
of recent advances in palaeontology. In Predators with
pouches: the biolog y of carnivorous marsupials (ed. M. E.
Jones, C. Dickman & M. Archer), pp. 102–123. Colling-
wood: CSIRO.
Wroe, S., Brammall, J. & Cooke, B. N. 1998 The skull of
Ekaltadeta ima (Marsupialia: Hypsiprymnodontidae):
an analysis of some cranial features among marsupials
with notes on the inference of carnivory in mammals.
J. Paleontol. 72, 738–751.
Wroe, S., Myers, T., Seebacher, F., Kear, B., Gillespie, A.,
Crowther, M. & Salisbury, S. 2003 An alternative method
for predicting body-mass: the case of the marsupial lion,
Thylacoleo carnifex. Paleobiology 29, 404–412.
Wroe, S., Argot, C., Crowther, M. & Dickman, C. 2004a On
the rarity of big fierce carnivores and primacy of isolation
and area: tracking large mammalian carnivore diversity
on two isolated continents. Proc. R. Soc. B 271, 1203–1211.
(doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2694.)
Wroe, S., Crowther, M., Dortch, J. & Chong, J. 2004b
The size of the largest marsupial and why it matters.
Proc. R. Soc. B 271 (Suppl.), S34–S36. (doi:10.1098/
rsbl.2003.0095.)
The supplementary Electronic Appendix is available at http://dx.doi.
org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2986 or via http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk.
As this paper exceeds the maximum length normally permitted, the
authors have agreed to contribute to production costs.
Bite force and predatory behaviour S. Wroe and others 7
Proc. R. Soc. B
... Bite force is heritable (Anderson et al., 2008;Zablocki-Thomas et al., 2021) and is a good indicator of an animal's dietary and behavioural ecology (Aguirre et al., 2003;Herrel et al., 2001;Krishnan, 2023;Maestri et al., 2016;Nogueira et al., 2009;Sakamoto, 2021). As such, the biting capability (bite force) of an animal has been widely studied in vertebrates (Sakamoto et al., 2019), ranging from fish (e.g., Herrel et al., 2002), amphibians (e.g., Deban & Richardson, 2017), reptiles (reviewed by Deeming, 2022), birds (reviewed by Deeming et al., 2022), and mammals (Grandal-d'Anglade, 2010;Grubich et al., 2012;Holliday, 2009;Mazzetta et al., 2009;Thomason, 1991;Wroe et al., 2005). More recently, several studies have also measured mandible forces in invertebrates, such as ants (Püffel et al., 2021). ...
... Bite force is often measured in vivo with vertebrates biting down on force transducers (Ellis et al., 2008;Herrel et al., 1998;Sustaita & Hertel, 2010;Verma et al., 2017). However, in instances where this is not possible, for example, when specialised equipment is not available, or for extinct species in a palaeontological context, bite force can be inferred through the use of skeletal elements, such as skull width (Anderson et al., 2008) and skull length (Wroe et al., 2005) in mammals, or, in dinosaurs, dimensions of the cranial adductor chambers (Mazzetta et al., 2004;Rayfield et al., 2001;Sakamoto et al., 2019). Alternative methods include calculation of bite force following finite element analysis of 3D scans derived from computerised tomography (e.g., Cost et al., 2020). ...
... Physical elements of the skull allow for prediction of a functional trait, such as skull width being a reliable estimator of bite force in finches (van der Meij & Bout, 2008). Although in the fossil record soft tissues are often not preserved (Lautenschlager et al., 2013), other osteological elements, such as muscle scarring, are commonly measured as a proxy for the size of muscles (Sakamoto et al., 2019;Wroe et al., 2005). This 'dry skull method' and has been extensively used to predict bite force in extinct species, especially mammals (Huber et al., 2005;Law & Mehta, 2019;Thomason, 1991;Walmsley et al., 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Jaw morphology and function determine the range of dietary items that an organism can consume. Bite force is a function of the force exerted by the jaw musculature and applied via the skeleton. Bite force has been studied in a wide range of taxa using various methods, including direct measurement, or calculation from skulls or jaw musculature. Data for parrots (Psittaciformes), considered to have strong bites, are rare. This study calculated bite force for a range of parrot species of differing sizes using a novel method that relied on forces calculated using the area of jaw muscles measured in situ and their masses. The values for bite force were also recorded in vivo using force transducers, allowing for a validation of the dissection‐based models. The analysis investigated allometric relationships between measures of body size and calculated bite force. Additionally, the study examined whether a measure of a muscle scar could be a useful proxy to estimate bite force in parrots. Bite force was positively allometric relative to body and skull mass, with macaws having the strongest bite recorded to date for a bird. Calculated values for bite force were not statistically different from measured values. Muscle scars from the adductor muscle attachment on the mandible can be used to accurately predict bite force in parrots. These results have implications for how parrots process hard food items and how bite forces are estimated in other taxa using morphological characteristics of the jaw musculature.
... These osteological traits position the associated masticatory musculature to maximize bite force and chewing strength. Specifically, the short, wide jaws of large prey specialists facilitate greater bite forces by increasing the leverage of the masticatory musculature (Biknevicius & Ruff, 1992;Christiansen & Wroe, 2007;Slater et al., 2009;Wroe et al., 2005). Previous estimates of the bite force quotient of L. pictus revealed that it has among the greatest relative canine bite forces of extant Carnivora, falling above the regression line between predicted bite force and body mass (Wroe et al., 2005;Damasceno et al., 2013). ...
... Specifically, the short, wide jaws of large prey specialists facilitate greater bite forces by increasing the leverage of the masticatory musculature (Biknevicius & Ruff, 1992;Christiansen & Wroe, 2007;Slater et al., 2009;Wroe et al., 2005). Previous estimates of the bite force quotient of L. pictus revealed that it has among the greatest relative canine bite forces of extant Carnivora, falling above the regression line between predicted bite force and body mass (Wroe et al., 2005;Damasceno et al., 2013). The mechanical advantage of its masticatory forces is greatest at P 3 and P 4 , falling within the range of the modern bone-cracking Crocuta crocuta (Tseng & Stynder, 2011). ...
... While masticatory muscles in L. pictus may not be relatively more massive than in other taxa, their extensive bony attachments at positions of maximal mechanical advantage (Figure 1a-c) likely result in their extremely great bite forces (Damasceno et al., 2013;Wroe et al., 2005). Here, the 3D osteological models of the skull demonstrated expanded muscular attachment sites. ...
Article
Full-text available
African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) are unique among canids in their specialized hunting strategies and social organization. Unlike other, more omnivorous canids, L. pictus is a hypercarnivore that consumes almost exclusively meat, particularly prey larger than its body size, which it hunts through cooperative, exhaustive predation tactics. Its bite force is also among the highest reported for carnivorans. Here, we dissected an adult male L. pictus specimen and conducted diffusion iodine contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) scans to evaluate and describe its masticatory and oral cavity musculature. Muscles of mastication in L. pictus are separated by deep layers of thick intermuscular fascia and deep insertions. The superficial surface of m. masseter is entirely covered by an extremely thick masseteric fascia. Deep to m. masseter pars reflexa and superficialis are additional bellies, m. masseter pars profunda and zygomaticomandibularis. Musculus temporalis in L. pictus, divides into suprazygomatic, superficial, and deep bellies separated by a deep layer of thick intermuscular fascia, and it inserts along the entire rostral margin of the mandibular ramus. Musculus digastricus appears to comprise a single, large fusiform belly which appears to receive its innervation exclusively from CN V3 (nervus mandibularis, division of nervus trigeminus). Musculus pterygoideus medialis and lateralis are each composed of a single, deep belly. However, despite its great bite force, the jaw adductor muscle mass in L. pictus is not increased for its body size over other canid taxa. This finding suggests there are other architectural adaptations to hypercarnivory beyond increased muscle volume (e.g., pennation angle, greater strength, optimization of lever arms for mechanical advantage).
... First, injuries in contests over food within a pack have never been observed (Creel & Creel, 1995. Second, the risk of injury during aggressive competitions would seem to be high, as African painted dogs possess the strongest bite forces relative to their body mass among extant carnivores (Wroe et al., 2005). Finally, given the risk of kleptoparasitism and predation, food competition appears costly (Jordan et al., 2022). ...
... In previous studies, PAB was described as an "appeasement behaviour" or "begging" in feeding contexts where both aggression and food sharing likely occur, although its role has not been examined (Estes, 1967;Rütten & Fleissner, 2004;Bucci et al., 2022;Jordan et al., 2023). In this species, severe injuries due to conflicts among group members have rarely been observed despite their strong bite force (Creel & Creel, 2002;Wroe et al., 2005). This suggests that appeasement behaviours to prevent escalated aggression should be fundamental for maintaining the peacefulness of a pack in this species. ...
Article
In some group-living species that share food, interindividual disagreement on access to food is mediated by several types of negotiation, ranging from appeasing the current owner to reduce aggression and gain access to the food, to harassment where non-owners assert their presence and apply insistent pressure until owners give up their food. In some species, non-owners employ specific behaviours used in other social contexts during negotiation, which makes it challenging to discern their precise functions. The core prediction of the harassment hypothesis is that intense pressure by beggars makes owners abandon their food and leads to food monopolisation, which is not predicted by the appeasement hypothesis. In the African painted dog ( Lycaon pictus ), non-owners assume a low posture and produce high-pitched vocalisations — a suite of behaviours considered appeasement in non-feeding contexts. This study examined whether these behaviours, referred to collectively as putative appeasement behaviour (PAB), serve as appeasement in the context of feeding or whether they may also, or only, be used for harassment. To this end, we used behavioural experiments in captive parent–offspring or full sibling pairs. Individuals showed more frequent PAB when offered food that could not be easily shared (one vs. two bones). As aggression also only occurred under that condition, PAB seems to have a function in appeasement. However, we observed a positive effect of PAB on food monopolisation by PAB actors but not on co-feeding. Persistent PAB led to monopolisation, indicating that these behaviours serve as a form of harassment in feeding. We did not observe reciprocity between paired individuals, another possible form of food monopolisation besides appeasement and harassment. In conclusion, PAB in the African painted dog functions as both appeasement and harassment, and this highly tolerant species employs negotiation strategies in feeding.
... A representative study that estimates quantitative values of masticatory muscles from skull measurements employs a method developed by Thomason (1991). This method involves calculating the area from photographs taken of both the dorsal and ventral sides of the skull (Christiansen & Adolfssen, 2005;Christiansen & Wroe, 2007;Damasceno et al., 2013;Ellis et al., 2008;McHenry et al., 2007;Wroe, 2008;Wroe et al., 2005;Wroe & Milne, 2007;. ...
... Many research works have estimated the masticatory muscle from the skull to calculate the bite force (Dickinson et al., 2021;Ellis et al., 2008Ellis et al., , 2009Kiltie, 1984;Perry, 2018;Perry et al., 2015;Perry, Hartstone-Rose, & Logan, 2011;Thomason, 1991). Most of the bite force literature of carnivorans have utilized Thomason's method: wide array of species (Christiansen & Adolfssen, 2005;Christiansen & Wroe, 2007;Wroe et al., 2005;Wroe & Milne, 2007;, felids (Sakamoto et al., 2010), canids (Damasceno et al., 2013), and the sabertooth cat (Smilodon fatalis) . Since our method does not estimate bite force, we cannot make a side-by-side comparison with the Thomason's method (Thomason, 1991). ...
Article
Full-text available
Masticatory muscles are composed of the temporalis, masseter, and pterygoid muscles in mammals. Each muscle has a different origin on the skull and insertion on the mandible; thus, all masticatory muscles contract in different directions. Collecting in vivo data and directly measuring the masticatory muscles anatomically in various Carnivora species is practically problematic. This is because some carnivorans can be ferocious, rare, or even extinct. Consequently, the most practical method to collect data on the force generated by the masticatory muscle is to estimate the force based on skulls. The physiological cross‐sectional area (PCSA) of each masticatory muscle, which correlates to the maximum force that can be produced by a muscle, was quantified. Using computed tomography, we defined the three‐dimensional measurement area for 32 carnivoran species based on the origin and insertion of masticatory muscles specified by observable crests, ridges, and scars. Subsequent allometric analysis relating the measurement area on skull surface to the PCSA for each masticatory muscle measured in fresh specimens revealed a strong correlation between the two variables. This finding indicates that within Carnivora, an estimation of absolute masticatory muscle PCSA can be derived from measurements area on skull surface. This method allows for the use of cranial specimens, housed in museums and research institutions, that lack preserved masticatory muscles in quantitative studies involving masticatory muscle PCSA. This approach facilitates comprehensive discussions on the masticatory muscle morphology of Carnivora, including rare and extinct species.
... The most likely interpretation of this mode of function of the jaw apparatus is that ornithosuchids were mainly adapted to hunt and rapidly kill large, not very mobile prey (Sennikov, 2024). The high bite force of ornithosuchids (Baczko, 2018), resembling modern mammalian carnivores (Wroe et al., 2005;Christiansen and Wroe, 2007), short-snouted crocodiles (Endo et al., 2002) or tyrannosaurids (Meers, 2002;Therrien et al., 2005) should suggest large prey size. At the same time, the slow, powerful bite of ornithosuchids is completely unsuitable for seizing small, agile terrestrial tetrapods and fast-swimming amphibians or fish. ...
Article
Ornithosuchidae differ from other carnivorous archosaurs in the unique morphology of the jaw apparatus and postcranial skeleton. Various, often opposite, points of view have been expressed regarding their trophic adaptations-from carnivory and scavenging to piscivory. The most reasonable hypothesis seems to be that ornithosuchids were medium sized hyperanisodont carnivorous macrophages. Moreover, there are some analogies between ornithosuchids and saber-toothed therapsids and mammals.
... Additionally, finite element analyses (Bourke et al., 2008;Ruiz et al., 2023) allows to explore how stresses and strains due to biting are distributed across the skull. Estimations of the PCSA can be made from gross dissection, or using the dry skull method which consists in applying equations based on skull measurements reflecting the geometric surface of insertion of the jaw adductors (e.g., Christiansen & Adolfssen, 2005;Christiansen & Wroe, 2007;Damasceno et al., 2013;Ellis et al., 2008Ellis et al., , 2009Forbes-Harper et al., 2017;Thomason, 1991;Wroe et al., 2005;Wroe & Milne, 2007). Dissection allows to quantify muscle architecture more precisely (mass, fiber length, and pennation angle) and thus to estimate PCSA much more accurately than the dry skull method (Ito et al., 2024;Law & Mehta, 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
The impact of artificial selection on the masticatory apparatus of dogs has been poorly studied, and comparative data with dogs subjected to more natural constraints are lacking. This study explores the jaw musculature of Tunisian street dogs, which are largely free from the influence of breed‐specific selection. The masticatory muscles (digastric, masseter, temporalis, and pterygoid) of 27 adult dogs were dissected and muscle mass and physiological cross‐sectional area (PCSA) were quantified, providing a baseline for comparisons between dogs from more natural versus more controlled environments. Our findings reveal that the morphology of the jaw adductor muscles is remarkably conserved among dogs, despite significant variation in skull shape. Additionally, all masticatory muscles scale isometrically with body mass. Notably, females exhibit functional adaptations that optimize muscle strength, particularly in the temporalis muscle, despite showing smaller overall muscle volumes compared to males. This could be linked to differences in predation, competition for food, or factors related to sexual behavior. Preliminary evidence suggests that captivity may limit the development of muscle mass and PCSA in the temporalis muscle, likely due to changes in lifestyle and diet. Significant relationships were also observed between skull shape and muscle data, particularly in the mandible, indicating that skull variability reflects jaw adductor muscle anatomy to some degree. This study enhances our understanding of jaw muscle morphology and function in feral dog populations and offers insights into the adaptation of the masticatory apparatus in dogs.
... Next, muscle forces, joint and bite point constraints, and material properties were defined to fully parameterize the jaw model. The amount of force generated by each muscle insertion area (towards the centroid points on cranial reference meshes) was set to be proportional to the surface area represented by the muscle insertion meshed, multiplied by 0.3 N based on a maximum muscle contraction force of 0.3 N/mm 2 (Wroe, McHenry & Thomason, 2005). We used muscle insertion area as a proxy for muscle contractile force rather than estimated physiological cross section area because 3D information is not available from the 2D specimen photographs. ...
Article
Full-text available
The mammalian adult dentition is a non-renewable resource. Tooth attrition and disease must be accommodated by individuals using behavioral, physiological, and/or musculoskeletal shifts to minimize impact on masticatory performance. From a biomechanical perspective, the musculoskeletal system becomes less efficient at producing bite force for a given amount of muscle input force over an individual’s life, because tooth-food contact area increases as cusps wear. In this study we ask the question: does mandibular biomechanical performance show evidence of compensation with increasing tooth wear? We use representative taxa of three carnivoran ecomorphologies (meat specialist, scavenger, bone cracker) as a study system to compare morphofunctional data on tooth macrowear, jaw depth, bite mechanical efficiency, and jaw stress during biting. No significant shifts in adult mandibular corpus dimensions occurs in the sampled taxa as canine and carnassial teeth wear. In bone cracking spotted hyenas carnassial biting mechanical efficiency increases significantly with increasing tooth wear, with no significant change in mandibular stress. Analyses of the fossil carnivore Hyaenodon suggests an increase in canine biting efficiency with increased tooth wear, but this may reflect interspecific variation or phylogenetic contingency rather than a life history shift. Overall, these findings indicate that scavenging hyaenids and felid meat specialists do not exhibit morphofunctional compensation for the decreased mechanical capability of worn and dull teeth. Behavioral modifications, rather than musculoskeletal adjustments, may instead play a major role in maintaining food acquisition and processing capabilities for individuals surviving into advanced ontogenetic age and tooth wear. These observations highlight the mammalian masticatory system as having a dynamic performance profile through its useful lifespan, and encourage a more nuanced understanding of past and present carnivore guilds by considering wear-dependent performance changes as a possible source of selection.
... In felids, the TMJ consists of an elongate, cylindrical condyle that fits into a correspondingly shaped glenoid fossa, while bony structures of the temporal bone greatly limit mediolateral movement, and the articular disc is extremely thin (Arzi & Staszyk, 2019). The Tasmanian Devil, which has the strongest bite force of any extant mammal relative to body size (Wroe et al., 2005), like eutherian carnivores, has well-developed preglenoid and postglenoid processes that prevent dislocation and mediolateral gliding movements of the condyle, and the lateral pterygoid muscles attached to the condyle are very poorly developed. There is no articular disc and the Tasmanian Devil TMJ appears to be principally a ginglymoid (hinge) joint (Hayashi et al., 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a distinguishing feature of mammals, and in most mammals includes an articular disc that buffers the loads placed on it by mastication. The disc is well developed in mammals with significant lateral masticatory jaw movements but is absent in toothless mammals, including extant monotremes, although histological studies of developing monotremes have shown rudimentary discs that fail to mature. Platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) grind their food between keratinous pads in the maxillae and lower jaws and are the only edentulate mammals that masticate their food. In this study, we characterize the anatomy of the TMJ of the adult platypus to see if we can reconcile the anatomy, including the absence of the articular disc, with the mandibular movements observed in video recordings. We studied the gross anatomy of the maxillofacial region and the microstructure using microcomputed tomography (micro‐CT) and histological examination. Platypuses had well‐developed masticatory muscles but lacked an articular disc between the mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa. The surface of the glenoid fossa was slightly concave than that of the condylar head was correspondingly slightly convex. The pre‐ and postglenoid processes were not well developed. Micro‐CT showed dense trabecular bone in the anterior part of the condyle, where the lateral pterygoid muscle attached. Histological analysis showed that the surfaces of the condyle and glenoid fossa consisted of dense, avascular and thickened fibrous connective tissue. In addition, well‐developed synovial folds were present. These anatomical characteristics are consistent with both anterior and lateral movements of the mandible, while the thick layer of connective tissue substitutes for a disc by absorbing the mechanical stresses associated with mastication. The failure of the disc primordium to develop cannot be attributed to a lack of muscle development, but the distribution of stresses in the toothless platypus jaw is likely to be different from those in a masticating eutherian.
... While fatal attacks are exceedingly rare and not documented in recent times in Pennsylvania, interactions may result in injuries. Black bears are found to have a bite force of up to 800 PSI [ 2]. This amount of force is more than enough to cause extensive damage to bone and surrounding structures. ...
Article
Full-text available
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a known sequela of open traumatic skull fractures within the pediatric traumatic brain injury population. Black bears are a known entity within the region of northeast Pennsylvania. It is plausible to have a bear–human interaction resulting in significant bodily injury. A 15-month-old male presented in May 2023 as a level 1 trauma alert for a concerning wound at the base of the skull leaking clear fluid; suspicious for CSF. As a result of this interaction, significant bodily injury can occur, such as CSF leaks and traumatic skull fractures. Living in a region within a known bear population poses a minimal risk of injury. Pediatric populations are usually at a low risk for traumatic CSF leaks. Most of the CSF leaks will resolve spontaneously, without acute surgical intervention, as was seen in our patient after a traumatic bear mauling.
Chapter
Tapirs have a fossil record stretching back to the early Eocene epoch (c. 50 million years). Throughout their evolutionary history, tapirs (and their closest kin) occupied restricted niches in moist and dense habitats, exhibiting many basal perissodactyl features, and sometimes earning them the label of “living fossils”. Recent research employing state-of-the-art methodologies alongside increased curatorial and excavation efforts has shed greater light on the functional morphology, ecology and relationships of extinct tapirs. These works demonstrate that, despite a fossil record that is far less rich than that of their horse and rhinoceros relatives, tapirs have been a successful, diverse and adaptable clade of large ungulates. New evidence on their functional, phylogenetic, geographical, and physiological attributes has come to light in recent years, demonstrating just how much we do not yet know about the evolution of tapirs. A greater understanding of the fossil record of this clade of megaherbivores may provide invaluable information on the adaptability and survival prospects for modern tapir species in an increasingly uncertain climatic period of Earth’s history. We review the fossil record of tapirs, and provide an overview of historical understanding and recent advances, highlighting questions which are yet to be answered as regards the tapir fossil record.
Article
Full-text available
It has been suggested that the large theropod dinosaur Tyrannosaurus rex was capable of producing extremely powerful bite forces and resisting multi-directional loading generated during feeding. Contrary to this suggestion is the observation that the cranium is composed of often loosely articulated facial bones, although these bones may have performed a shock-absorption role. The structural analysis technique finite element analysis (FEA) is employed here to investigate the functional morphology and cranial mechanics of the T. rex skull. In particular, I test whether the skull is optimized for the resistance of large bi-directional feeding loads, whether mobile joints are adapted for the localized resistance of feeding-induced stress and strain, and whether mobile joints act to weaken or strengthen the skull overall. The results demonstrate that the cranium is equally adapted to resist biting or tearing forces and therefore the 'puncture-pull' feeding hypothesis is well supported. Finite-element-generated stress-strain patterns are consistent with T. rex cranial morphology: the maxilla-jugal suture provides a tensile shock-absorbing function that reduces localized tension yet 'weakens' the skull overall. Furthermore, peak compressive and shear stresses localize in the nasals rather than the fronto-parietal region as seen in Allosaurus, offering a reason why robusticity is commonplace in tyrannosaurid nasals.
Chapter
Full-text available
Borophaginae is the largest of the three subfamilies of the dog family Canidae, with some 66 species, spanning approximately 34 m.y. (Orellan to Blancan). Not surprisingly, this extensive radiation of canids includes a diverse array of dietary types, ranging from hypocarnivorous to hypercarnivorous and durophagous. The last 16 m.y. of borophagine history is dominated by hypercarnivorous forms that were the dominant doglike predators within their faunas. Because of their relatively robust skeletons and their resemblance to extant hyenas in craniodental morphology, many or most of these hypercarnivorous species, particularly those of the late Miocene and Pliocene, have been assumed as primarily scavengers rather than hunters. The classification of most hypercarnivorous borophagines as scavengers relegates them to much less important roles in the ecology and evolution of their respective communities than does a classification as hunters. Unlike hunters, scavengers are unlikely to influence the evolution of the animals they eat, and are expected to exist at relatively low densities as do the only extant scavenging carnivorans, brown (Parahyaena brunnea) and striped hyenas (Hyaena hyaena). Given the substantial fossil record of the Borophaginae, it seems unlikely that all or most of the hypercarnivorous forms were primarily scavengers. Moreover, if some hunted, the larger species might be expected to have done so in groups, as large canids hunt in packs today. Here we examine possible foraging modes within the Borophaginae using morphometrics and two new approaches to estimating the typical prey size of extinct carnivores. The craniodental morphology of the Borophaginae is compared with that of the living Caninae and Hyaeninae (hyaenids exclusive of Proteles cristata, the aardwolf) based on measurements that reflect relative tooth size, jaw muscle leverage, rigidity of the dentary, and grinding versus slicing function of the teeth. The Borophaginae are found to be intermediate in morphology between the Caninae and Hyaeninae. Unlike hyaenids and like canines, they retain substantial postcarnassial molars. However, like hyaenids, the borophagines had significantly stronger jaws and enhanced jaw muscle leverage compared to other canids. Prey size is estimated for borophagines based on correlation between dentary height and typical prey size in living canids. These results are compared with those produced using a recently published energetic model that predicts that all carnivores larger than about 21 kg feed on prey as large or larger than themselves. The methods provide similar predictions, resulting in a list of 11 borophagines (all subtribes Aelurodontina and Borophagina) that probably consumed large prey. Comparisons with extant hyaenids reveal that the sole hunter of large prey, the spotted hyena (Crocuta), differs from the two mainly scavenging species, the brown and striped hyenas, in being significantly larger, more abundant, and widespread. Moreover, morphometric comparisons indicate that spotted hyenas have a more hypercarnivorous dentition. Given this, it is expected that the largest, most common borophagines with the most reduced dental grinding areas hunted most of their food. Based on their craniodental morphology and abundance in the record, Epicyon saevus, E. haydeni, Borophagus secundus, Aelurodon ferox, and A. taxoides were hunters. Although it is clear that Aelurodon and Borophagus were more capable of grasping prey than are extant canids, no borophagine evolved sharp, curved claws as in felids. Consequently, their ability to grapple with prey seems to have been limited, and packs were probably more successful at making a kill than individuals. Previous workers have argued against hunting in borophagines based on heavy dental wear, robust skeletal morphology, and external brain features. None of these precludes either hunting or hunting in packs in our view, and sharp teeth are not required for making a kill. While limb morphology and skeletal proportions of most or all borophagines do not appear adapted for the kind of hunts observed today in the African wild dog Lycaon pictus, long-distance, high-speed pursuits over shorter distances would have been possible for borophagines. The association between external brain morphology and social behavior in living carnivorans has not been fully explored, and seems a weak criterion for sociality in extinct species.
Book
Predators with Pouches provides a unique synthesis of current knowledge of the world’s carnivorous marsupials—from Patagonia to New Guinea and North America to Tasmania. Written by 63 experts in each field, the book covers a comprehensive range of disciplines including evolution and systematics, reproductive biology, physiology, ecology, behaviour and conservation. Predators with Pouches reveals the relationships between the American didelphids and the Australian dasyurids, and explores the role of the marsupial fauna in the mammal community. It introduces the geologically oldest marsupials, from the Americas, and examines the fall from former diversity of the larger marsupial carnivores and their convergent evolution with placental forms. The book covers all aspects of carnivorous marsupials, including interesting features of life history, their unique reproduction, the physiological basis for early senescence in semelparous dasyurids, sex ratio variation and juvenile dispersal. It looks at gradients in nutrition—from omnivory to insectivory to carnivory—as well as distributional ecology, social structure and conservation dilemmas.
Article
The borophagine canids were bone-cracking scavengers in the Miocene-Pleistocene of North America. In this they parallel the Recent hyenas. This paper analyzes the borophagine adaptation in relation to that of hyaenids, using Osteoborus cyonoides as an example. The emphasis during canid evolution on the posterior molars, which is a derived condition, created a constraint on the adaptation of borophagines. This constraint meant that the borophagines used P4/4 as bone-cracking teeth, whereas hyaenids use P3/3. Other than the evolution of a specialized bone-cracking tooth, the borophagines adapted to bone cracking by evolving a vaulted and strengthened skull for the dissipation of the strong forces generated during bone cracking. -from Author
Article
The feeding behavior of the theropod dinosaur Tyrannosaurus rex is investigated through analysis of two variables that are critical to successful predation, bite force and prey body mass, as they scale with the size of the predator. These size-related variables have important deterministic effects on the predator's feeding strategy, through their effects on lethal capacity and choice of prey. Bite force data compiled for extant predators (crocodylians, carnivorans, chelonians and squamates) are used to establish a relationship between bite force and body mass among extant predators. These data are used to estimate the maximum potential bite force of T. rex, which is between about 183,000 and 235,000 N for a bilateral bite. The relationship between maximum prey body mass and predator body mass among the same living vertebrates is used to infer the likely maximum size of prey taken by T. rex in the Late Cretaceous. This makes it possible to arrive at a more rigorous assessment of the role of T. rex as an active predator and/or scavenger than has hitherto been possible. The results of this analysis show that adult Triceratops horridus fall well within the size range of potential prey that are predicted to be available to a solitary, predaceous T. rex. This analysis establishes boundary conditions for possible predator/prey relationships among other dinosaurs, as well as between these two taxa.