... However, no direct evidence has shown that acridity is caused by mechanical puncturing of the skin and several studies suggest that the raphides do not cause acridity (Moy et al., 1979;Paull et al., 1999;Pohl, 1964). Evidence that acridity is due not to the raphides but to a factor on the raphides includes the following: (i) Acridity is lost with cooking and after extraction with methanol, ethanol, distilled water, and water/detergent mixtures with intact raphides remaining (Akpan & Umoh, 2004;Bradbury & Nixon, 1998;Chai & Liebman, 2005;Moy et al., 1979;Payne et al., 1941;Pedler & Warden, 1888;Saha & Hussain, 1983;Tang & Sakai, 1983;Tsai et al., 2006); (ii) there is no strong relationship between acridity and raphide number or amount of calcium oxalate extracted (Halloway et al., 1989;Moy et al., 1979;Payne et al., 1941); (iii) species that have pointed raphides can have very low or no acridity (Bradbury & Nixon, 1998;Ledbetter & Porter, 1970); (iv) the slowness of the acridity response at low concentrations does not suggest mechanical injury; (v) wide variation in sensitivity to taro acridity is not consistent with mechanical penetration; (vi) fewer raphide bundles are often found in the more acrid taro cultivars (Moy et al., 1979); and (vii) treatment of purified acrid raphides with protease leads to rapid loss of acridity with no change in raphide morphology (Paull et al., 1999). An alternate possibility is that chemical irritants or allergens occur on the surface of the raphides (Bradbury & Nixon, 1998;Konno et al., 2014;Nixon, 1987;Paull et al., 1999;Suzuki et al., 1975;Tang & Sakai, 1983), and the raphides play a synergist role as carriers (Konno et al., 2014). ...