Content uploaded by Helen E O'Connell
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Helen E O'Connell on Nov 21, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
CLITORAL ANATOMY IN NULLIPAROUS, HEALTHY,
PREMENOPAUSAL VOLUNTEERS USING UNENHANCED
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
HELEN E. O’CONNELL*,† and JOHN O. L. DeLANCEY
From the Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, and Department
of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan (JOLD), Ann Arbor, Michigan
Abstract
Purpose—We determined the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of normal clitoral
anatomy.
Materials and Methods—A series of MRI studies of 10 healthy, nulliparous volunteers with no
prior surgery and normal pelvic examination was studied and the key characteristics of clitoral
anatomy were determined. A range of different magnetic resonance sequences was used without any
contrast agent.
Results—The axial plane best revealed the clitoral body and its proximal continuation as the paired
crura. The glans was seen more caudal than the body of the clitoris. The bulbs of the clitoris had the
same signal as the rest of the clitoris in the axial plane and they related consistently to the other
erectile structures. The bulbs, body and crura formed an erectile tissue cluster, namely the clitoris.
In turn, the clitoris partially surrounded the urethra and vagina, forming a consistently observed tissue
complex. Midline sagittal section revealed the shape of the body, although in this plane the rest of
the clitoris was poorly displayed. The coronal plane revealed the relationship between the clitoral
body and labia. The axial section cephalad to the clitoral body best revealed the vascular component
of the neurovascular bundle to the clitoris. The fat saturation sequence particularly highlighted clitoral
anatomy in healthy, premenopausal, nulliparous women.
Conclusions—Normal clitoral anatomy has been clearly demonstrated using noncontrast pelvic
MRI.
Keywords
clitoris; magnetic resonance imaging; anatomy; premenopause; parity
Although there has been some recent progress, advances in understanding male sexual function
and dysfunction have not been paralleled by similar advances in female sexual function, even
in basic anatomy and physiology. A problem facing researchers in female sexuality is the fact
that the clitoris is largely an internal structure relative to the external visibility of the penis.
Clitoral anatomy based on cadaveric studies have been limited by the lack of access to younger
* Correspondence: Suite 12, Private Medical Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia (telephone: +61–
3-9347 9911; FAX: +61–3-9347 5960; e-mail: ( helenoc@melbpc.org.au)..
† Financial interest and/or other relationship with Continence Control, Systems International, Lilly, and Johnson and Johnson.
Study received institutional review board approval.
Supported by the Bruce Pearson Fellowship of the Urological Foundation of Australia and National Institute of Health Grants DK51405
and HD 38665.
NIH Public Access
Author Manuscript
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
Published in final edited form as:
J Urol. 2005 June ; 173(6): 2060–2063.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
specimens with most being from elderly, postmenopausal women in whom erectile structures
were distorted by the absence of blood flow and by the embalming process.
Suh et al described detailed imagery of female genital anatomy using magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) with the blood pool contrast medium MS-325.1 Visualization was poor or
absent on T1-weighted images prior to contrast medium use. Two other reports from the same
center indicated that this is useful for evaluating female sexual arousal.2, 3 However, there is
no comment on MRI obtained by the fat saturation technique and planes other than the axial
plane are not provided. Prior studies also involved women in whom parity status was unknown.
We present findings in a series of healthy, premenopausal, nulliparous volunteers and describe
clitoral anatomy as seen in each plane using unenhanced MRI. Dissection studies revealed
significant age related atrophy, and so we expected that clitoral tissues of premenopausal
women would be more easily distinguished with MRI than would tissues from an unselected
group of women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An institutional review board approved MRI study was commenced at the University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor in 1994. This prospective study involved the MRI evaluation of 240
patients, specifically to evaluate the effects of a first birth. Among these women were a
consecutive series of 10 healthy, nulliparous, premenopausal volunteers with no prior surgery
and no abnormality on pelvic examination. They underwent several MRI sequences to test
which of them best showed the pelvic floor structures. These scans form the basis of this study.
Scanning techniques included T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE), T1-weighted spin-echo and
proton density FSE with or without fat saturation. A 1.5 Tesla magnet machine was used to
create the images. For most scans 0.4 cm section thickness with a 1.0 cm space between sections
and a matrix size of 256 × 256 were used. Each scan was first examined to determine the
features present in each plane (axial, coronal and sagittal) with each type of scanning. In a few
series 1.0 cm sections were used and the sections omitted anatomical detail. For the purpose
of clarifying clitoral anatomy only images using 0.4 cm section thickness are shown. All scans
were then reexamined to determine the consistency with each of the features identified. The
consistent findings are detailed. Structure identification was based on our previous published
cadaver studies.4
Prior to analysis all images were converted into digital files masking identifying features (name
and date of birth) of the individual. No other modification of the images was made.
RESULTS
Clitoral anatomy was shown most clearly in the axial plane. The sagittal and coronal planes
provided further details and they were complementary. Ultimately all components of the
clitoris, crura, corpora, bulbs, glans and its neurovascular bundle could be clearly identified
on MRI after the combination of the 3 planes was used. Each plane provided a different
representation of the structure.
Figure 1, A shows a typical axial proton density scan without fat saturation. The clitoris is
ventral to the urethra and vagina. Its body projects into the fat of the mons pubis. It is composed
of 5 components, namely the paired corpora united in the midline and separated only by a
fibrous septum, the bilateral (vestibular) bulbs and the single glans. The glans is a more caudal
structure and, therefore, it was seen in more caudal sections (fig. 1, B and C). The corpora
diverge and follow the pubic rami on each side, where they are called the crura. The clitoris is
distinct from the urethra and vagina. In figure 1, A the target-like appearance of the urethra is
particularly distinct with the urethral wall having a darker gray color than the surrounding
O’CONNELL and DeLANCEY Page 2
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
clitoris. The bulbs flank the urethra and vagina laterally. This axial section lies directly caudal
to the symphysis pubis. The fat in this sequence is the whitest structure, followed by the
cavernous tissue of the clitoris, the urethral lumen, the vaginal wall, the urethral wall and finally
muscle in decreasing order of intensity. Dorsally the clitoris, urethra and vagina are related to
the ischiorectal fat and in the midline they are related to the anal canal. The body of the clitoris
is an angled structure that projects inferiorly into the mons pubis fat with its most caudal part
continuous with the glans clitoris. Figure 1, B shows an axial section 1.0 cm caudal to the figure
1, A section. Because of the shape of the clitoris, the glans is typically seen in a more caudal
axial section than the rest of the clitoris. In this woman the glans is seen in 2 sections (fig. 1,
B and C). In the more caudal sections the urethra and vagina are not distinct and the caudal
limit of the bulbs is just visible lateral to the urethra. The glans is the most distinct clitoral
structure in these sections. In some women the urethral meatus was also distinct in the most
caudal section.
The cavernous or erectile tissue was highlighted using a fat saturation technique. In this type
of scan the fat appeared black and the cavernous structures of the clitoris were bright white
(fig. 2). The urethral wall and vagina were also highlighted with this technique, although to a
lesser extent than cavernous tissue. Other surrounding tissues, muscle and bone appeared as
dark structures, increasing the contrast with the centrally placed cavernous structures. In axial
section the clitoris formed a triangular complex with the urethra and vagina, namely the
clitorourethrovaginal complex.
In figure 3, A the structures best seen are the vessels of the neurovascular bundles arising from
the pelvic side wall, where the terminal component of the pudendal neurovascular bundle
bifurcates into perineal and clitoral divisions to supply the clitorourethrovaginal complex. The
perineal division is also best seen in figure 3, A, while the clitoral division, which ascends along
the inferior pubic ramus adjacent to the crura, is best seen in figure 3, B. The neurovascular
bundle is cranial to the clitoral body. The autonomic cavernous neurovascular supply to the
clitoris is not visible on these MRI studies. The large clitoral neurovascular bundles on either
side ascend along the ischiopubic ramus to the under surface of the pubic symphysis in the
midline, from which they run along the cephalad surface of the clitoral body toward the glans.
These bundles, which were easily seen using dissection techniques, were not large enough to
be visible consistently on MRI, although fat saturation is known to highlight the vascular
structures.
Sagittal scans demonstrated the angled clitoral body and glans projecting into the mons on the
under surface of the symphysis pubis (fig. 4). The bulbs and crura were also visible in more
lateral sections, although not well displayed. Coronal sections revealed the 2 corpora forming
the body and ending as the glans clitoris (fig. 5). The body was seen attached to the under
surface of the symphysis pubis. The labia minora and majora were well seen in this coronal
section. The glans is visible extending more dorsal toward the anus because of its tendency to
curve dorsal and caudal.
Bulbar anatomy is best displayed in axial views and it was seen to a limited extent in sagittal
and coronal views in all women. The bulbs met ventral to the urethra. Dissection studies have
shown that they are not continuous across the midline.4 They descend on either side of the
urethra and flank the lateral aspect of the distal vaginal wall bilaterally.4 The bulbs have a more
consistent relationship with the clitoris and urethra than with the vestibule. Thus, in this study
the bulbs are named the bulbs of the clitoris according to their consistent relationship to the
clitoris.
O’CONNELL and DeLANCEY Page 3
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
DISCUSSION
MRI studies of the clitoris complement studies previously performed in cadavers4 and reveal
the anatomy in healthy, premenopausal nullipara. No major differences were apparent between
findings in the cadavers and on MRI, although in cadavers the structures appeared to be
atrophic, as would be expected because of the advanced age of most specimens and other
reasons.
Historical, social and scientific factors appear to be responsible for the poor presentation of
clitoral anatomy even in current textbooks. Active deletion of the clitoris as a labeled structure
from an early version of Gray’s Anatomy compared with subsequent versions indicates the
influence of social factors over science.5 The medical profession has also had a major influence
on female sexuality throughout history, particularly in the 19th century. The widespread
practice in Western medicine of clitoridectomy for indications as diverse as epilepsy, hysteria
and catalepsy is relatively recent.6 In addition to such factors, anatomists have compounded
the poor display of clitoral anatomy by revealing it only in 1 plane. While the sagittal plane
may suit the display of an essentially linear structure such as the penis, the clitoris is not well
displayed in this plane. The axial plane is the most useful. As a multiplanar modality, MRI
reveals each component of the clitoris and complements the information obtained at dissection.
This MRI study of the clitoris revealed each clitoral component in detail. The advantages of
MRI over dissection based study are that it reveals anatomy in the living subject and it has the
ability to enhance a given tissue because of its relative response to magnetic resonance. The
MRI technique of fat saturation enhances cavernous tissue, of which the clitoris is composed.
Fat saturation gives each clitoral structure a white appearance juxtaposed to all related
structures, which are a shade of gray. Even the urethra and vagina, which are vascular
structures, appear relatively gray by comparison to the clitoris. This indicates the highly
vascular nature of the clitoris even in the nonaroused state.
Recent research has shown that MRI is capable of demonstrating vascular enhancement that
may correlate with female sexual arousal, thereby, showing great promise for sexual function
studies.1–3 The new, gadolinium based, blood pool contrast agent MS-325 administered
intravenously has been found to provide an excellent depiction of the female genitalia in
premenopausal and postmenopausal women.1 The same agent has been shown to be useful in
studying changes in female genitalia that occur with sexual arousal. The exact superiority of
this contrast enhanced, T1-weighted study over the unenhanced fat saturation technique is not
clear. MRI with phased array pelvic and endorectal coils has been shown to be an excellent
tool for studying the female urethra and periurethral diseases.7
Objective imaging techniques such as MRI and even photography help overcome the
inaccuracies associated with diagrams. The structures least well described in anatomical
textbooks to date are the bulbs. Typically their relationship to the clitoris and urethra is not
acknowledged or in fact said not to exist.8 When depicted, the bulbs are usually drawn as if
they pass alongside the vaginal introitus, forming the core of the labia. MRI clearly shows the
extensive relationship between the urethra and bulbs, and also reveals how these structures are
intimately related to the crura and corpora forming the root of the clitoris, an anatomical
structure mentioned in some recent anatomical textbooks.9 The view of the bulbs afforded by
MRI shows even more clearly than with dissection that the bulbs on either side continue anterior
to the urethra and meet together in the midline without merging. The exact role of the bulbs in
urethral support and sexual function is unclear. Recent study has suggested they have a
significant role in urethral continence.10 The concept of the clitorourethrovaginal complex is
not new, having been called by French investigators after ultrasound based studies the
“ensemble uretro clitoridovulvaire.”11
O’CONNELL and DeLANCEY Page 4
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Previous studies have used confusing terminology or techniques that have failed clearly to
demonstrate clitoral anatomy. Recently MRI of couples copulating have been shown in sagittal
section,12 the plane which in these studies least clearly displays the clitoris. In the same study
the male subject only was administered sildenafil, relatively enhancing the signal intensity of
the penis and further obscuring the clitoris. In another MRI study in which a woman with true
hermaphroditism was depicted13 the term corpus spongiosum was used in reference to the
bulbs. In this study the clitoris was noted to be barely visible, part of the difficulty again being
the choice of plane, ie sagittal rather than axial, the latter being the plane of preference for
clitoral anatomy.
CONCLUSIONS
We observed that normal clitoral anatomy in healthy volunteers can be well displayed by MRI
using fat saturation techniques without using any contrast agent. The bright erectile tissue of
the clitoris surrounds the urethrovaginal complex anterolaterally. The bulbs are recognized as
parts of the clitoris and they should be preferably called bulbs of clitoris rather than vestibular
bulbs. Axial views are more useful for depicting most of the clitoris, and the sagittal and coronal
planes are complementary. This study complements cadaveric studies of clitoral anatomy and
provides further insights into the role and scope of MRI for demonstrating normal anatomy.
Professor John Hutson, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne supervised the dissection based
female urogenital anatomy project.
References
1. Suh DD, Yang CC, Cao Y, Garland PA, Maravilla KR. Magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the
female genitalia in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Urol 2003;170:138. [PubMed:
12796666]
2. Maravilla KR, Cao Y, Heiman JR, Garland PA, Peterson BT, Carter WO, et al. Serial MR imaging
with MS-325 for evaluating female sexual arousal response: determination of intrasubject
reproducibility. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:216. [PubMed: 12884335]
3. Deliganis AV, Maravilla KR, Heiman JR, Carter WO, Garland PA, Peterson BT, et al. Female genitalia:
dynamic MR imaging with use of MS-325: initial experiences evaluating female sexual response.
Radiology 2002;225:791. [PubMed: 12461263]
4. O’Connell HE, Hutson JM, Anderson CR, Plenter RJ. Anatomical relationship between urethra and
clitoris. J Urol 1998;159:1892. [PubMed: 9598482]
5. Moore LJ, Clarke AE. Clitoral conventions and transgressions: graphic representations in anatomy
texts, c1900–1991. Feminist Studies 1995;21:255.
6. Sheehan E. Victorian clitoridectomy: Isaac Baker Brown and his harmless operative procedure. Med
Anthropol Newsl 1981;12:9. [PubMed: 12263443]
7. Siegelman ES, Banner MP, Ramchandani P, Schnall MD. Multicoil MR imaging of symptomatic
female urethral and periurethral disease. Radiographics 1997;17:349. [PubMed: 9084077]
8. Bannister LH, Dyson M. Reproductive organs of the female. Vagina; female sexual organs. In: Gray’s
Anatomy, 38th ed. Edited by P. L. Williams, L. H. Bannister, M. M. Berry, P. Collins, M. Dyson, J.
E. Durrek et al. New York: Churchill Livingstone, sect. 14, pp. 1875–1877, 1995
9. Snell RS. The perineum. In: Clinical Anatomy for Medical Students, 5th ed. Boston: Little, Brown and
Co., chapt. 8, pp. 347–379, 1955
10. Baggish MS, Steele AC, Karram MM. The relationship of the vestibular bulb and corpora cavernosa
to the female urethra: a microanatomic study. Part 2 J Gynecol Surg 1999;15:171.
11. Lenck LC, Vanneuville G, Monnet JP, Harmand Y. Sphincter urétral (point G). Corrélations
anatomocliniques. Rev Fr Gynec Obst 1992;87:65. [PubMed: 1570456]
12. Schultz WW, van Andel P, Sabelis I, Mooyaart E. Magnetic resonance imaging of male and female
genitals during coitus and female sexual arousal. Br Med J 1999;319:1596. [PubMed: 10600954]
O’CONNELL and DeLANCEY Page 5
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
13. Hricak H, Chang YC, Thurnher S. Vagina: Evaluation with MRI imaging. Part I Normal anatomy
and congenital anomalies. Radiology 1988;169:169. [PubMed: 3420255]
APPENDIX
Each MRI study is accompanied by a diagram to highlight the clitoris: the anatomy of its
components, neurovascular supply and the related structures, the urethra and vagina.
O’CONNELL and DeLANCEY Page 6
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Fig. 1.
A, clitoris and its components, including bulbs, crura and corpora, are well demonstrated in
axial plane. These structures lie ventral and lateral to urethra and vagina as cluster or complex.
MRI specifications for this scan were FSE, TR:4000, TE:15/Ef, EC:1/1 16kHz, FOV: 16x16,
4.0thk/1.0sp, 30/04:16, 256x256/2 NEX, FCs/NP. B and C, next 2 sections caudal to section
A in same volunteer. B, clitoral glans ventral to remainder of clitoris. Its midline septum and
prepuce are evident. C, most caudal section reveals glans and caudal limit of urethra (urethral
meatus), clitoral bulbs and vagina (introitus). In this perineal section clitoral body and crura
are not present and urethral meatus and vaginal introitus are not distinct. MRI specifications
were FSE, TR:4000, TE:15/Ef, EC:1/1 16kHz, FOV:16x16, 4.0thk/1.0sp, 30/04:16, 256x256/2
NEX, FCs/NP.
O’CONNELL and DeLANCEY Page 7
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Fig. 2.
Using fat saturation highlighted cavernous tissue of clitoris surrounding urethra and vagina,
while other structures appeared gray or black. Triangular clitorourethrovaginal complex was
clearly seen using this sequence. MRI specifications were FSEIR, TR:4083, TE:22/Ef, EC:1/1
31.2kHz, TI:165, FOV20x20, 6.0thk/1.5sp, 15/06: 32, 256x192/4 NEX, NP/VB/SQ/SPF.
O’CONNELL and DeLANCEY Page 8
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Fig. 3.
A, this axial section cephalad to image shown in figures 1 and 2 reveals divisions of pudendal
neurovascular bundle (clitoral and perineal neurovascular bundles) supplying complex.
Vascular structures of bundle and cavernous tissue are highlighted by fat saturation. Nerves
are not shown by MRI but they are known from dissections to accompany vessels. B, another
fat saturated section cephalad to clitoris highlights clitoral veins draining into pudendal
neurovascular bundle attaching to pelvic side wall.
O’CONNELL and DeLANCEY Page 9
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Fig. 4.
This midline sagittal section highlights almost boomerang-like appearance of clitoral body,
crura and glans. MRI specifications were FSE, TR:4000, TE:15/Ef, EC:1/1 16kHz, FOV:
20x20, 4.0thk/1.0sp, 30/04:16, 256x256/2 NEX, FCf/NP.
O’CONNELL and DeLANCEY Page 10
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Fig. 5.
Coronal section reveals paired clitoral corpora comprising clitoral body, located caudal to pubic
symphysis. Caudal limit of body is glans. Relationship between glans and labia is seen. MRI
specifications were FSE, TR:4000, TE:15/Ef, EC:1/1 16kHz, FOV:16x16, 4.0thk/1.0sp,
30/04:16, 256x256/2 NEX, FCf/NP.
O’CONNELL and DeLANCEY Page 11
J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2005 November 14.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript