ArticlePDF Available

Disparities by Race in Heat-Related Mortality in Four US Cities: The Role of Air Conditioning Prevalence

Authors:

Abstract

Daily mortality is typically higher on hot days in urban areas, and certain population groups experience disproportionate risk. Air conditioning (AC) has been recommended to mitigate heat-related illness and death. We examined whether AC prevalence explained differing heat-related mortality effects by race. Poisson regression was used to model daily mortality in Chicago, Detroit, Minneapolis, and Pittsburgh. Predictors included natural splines of time (to control seasonal patterns); mean daily apparent temperature on the day of death, and averaged over lags 1-3; barometric pressure; day of week; and a linear term for airborne particles. Separate, city-specific models were fit to death counts stratified by race (Black or White) to derive the percent change in mortality at 29 degrees C, relative to 15 degrees C (lag 0). Next, city-specific effects were regressed on city- and race-specific AC prevalence. Combined effect estimates across all cities were calculated using inverse variance-weighted averages. Prevalence of central AC among Black households was less than half that among White households in all four cities, and deaths among Blacks were more strongly associated with hot temperatures. Central AC prevalence explained some of the differences in heat effects by race, but room-unit AC did not. Efforts to reduce disparities in heat-related mortality should consider access to AC.
1 of 7
Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine,
doi:10.1093/jurban/jti043
The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the New York Academy of Medicine. All rights
reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Disparities by Race in Heat-Related Mortality in
Four US Cities: The Role of Air Conditioning
Prevalence
Marie S. O’Neill, Antonella Zanobetti, and Joel Schwartz
ABSTRACT Daily mortality is typically higher on hot days in urban areas, and certain
population groups experience disproportionate risk. Air conditioning (AC) has been
recommended to mitigate heat-related illness and death. We examined whether AC
prevalence explained differing heat-related mortality effects by race. Poisson regression
was used to model daily mortality in Chicago, Detroit, Minneapolis, and Pittsburgh.
Predictors included natural splines of time (to control seasonal patterns); mean daily
apparent temperature on the day of death, and averaged over lags 1–3; barometric
pressure; day of week; and a linear term for airborne particles. Separate, city-specific
models were fit to death counts stratified by race (Black or White) to derive the percent
change in mortality at 29 ºC, relative to 15 ºC (lag 0). Next, city-specific effects were
regressed on city- and race-specific AC prevalence. Combined effect estimates across all
cities were calculated using inverse variance-weighted averages. Prevalence of central
AC among Black households was less than half that among White households in all
four cities, and deaths among Blacks were more strongly associated with hot tempera-
tures. Central AC prevalence explained some of the differences in heat effects by race,
but room-unit AC did not. Efforts to reduce disparities in heat-related mortality should
consider access to AC.
KEYWORDS Air conditioning, Climate, Ethnic groups, Heat, Mortality, Socioeconomic
factors, Weather.
INTRODUCTION
Black race, lower educational attainment, age, death outside a hospital, and lack of
access to air conditioning (AC) modify associations between ambient temperatures
and daily mortality.
1–5
Because AC can protect people from heat-related
mortality
1,6
and access to AC and resources to use it may differ by race, we evalu-
ated whether AC played a role in previously reported racial disparities in heat-
related mortality.
5
Dr. O’Neill is with The Robert Wood Johnson Health & Society Scholars Program, Center for Social
Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Drs. Zanobetti and
Schwartz are with the Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston,
Massachusetts; and Dr. Schwartz is with the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public
Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Correspondence: Marie S. O’Neill, PhD, The Robert Wood Johnson Health & Society Scholars
Program, Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Michigan, 1214 South
University Avenue, Room 249, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2548. (E-mail: marieo@umich.edu)
2 of 7 O’NEILL ET AL.
METHODS
Data Sources
Mortality and environmental data were described previously.
5
Briefly, daily, nonin-
jury mortality counts were obtained for 1986–1993 and stratified by race (Blacks
and Whites). This analysis used data for the metropolitan area (defined by county)
of four cities: Chicago, Illinois; Detroit, Michigan; Minneapolis and St. Paul,
Minneapolis (“Minneapolis” in this article); and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Here,
the term city refers to these metropolitan areas. We chose these cities because they
had an adequate number of hot days for estimating heat–mortality associations,
daily information on air pollution (which has been associated with daily
mortality
7
), and AC prevalence data. Between 1986 and 1993, 684,847 people died
in the four areas.
Weather data were from the airport station closest to each city. Apparent tem-
perature, an index of human discomfort, was calculated from ambient temperature
and dew point, as described previously.
5
Barometric pressure and concentrations of
particulate matter less than 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter (PM
10
) were also
covariates for this analysis. PM
10
can be inhaled into the lungs and has been linked
with several adverse health outcomes.
8
The American Housing Survey collects data on AC prevalence (central and one;
two; three or more room units) about every 4 years, sampling 4,800 or more housing
units per metropolitan area.
9
Between 1986 and 1993, two surveys were adminis-
tered in each of the four cities. City-specific AC prevalence was averaged from those
two surveys and applied over the entire study period. Prevalence was reported by
race/ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, and total). Because we lacked Hispanic mortality
data for the whole study period, we report AC prevalence statistics by Black house-
holds and “White/Other” (i.e., households not reported as being Black or Hispanic).
Statistical Methods
Robust Poisson regression was used to model daily death counts as the dependent
variable in models fit individually for each city. Independent variables included a
linear term for mean PM
10
on the day of death and the previous day and natural
cubic splines of mean daily barometric pressure, day of week, and day of study.
Because of the nonlinear dependence of mortality on temperature and previous
research showing differing lag structures for hot- and cold-weather mortality,
10
we
used two cubic splines to model temperature. The cold term was temperature aver-
aged over lags 1–3, and the heat term was temperature at lag 0. Other details of
model fitting criteria are described elsewhere.
5
City-specific regressions were fit to
daily death counts among Blacks and Whites, and a combined four-city effect esti-
mate was calculated for each race by using inverse variance-weighted averages.
To evaluate the effects of AC prevalence, we performed a meta-regression with
a model of the following form:
β
ij
=C
0
+
γ
Z
ij
+ε
ij
where
β
ij
is the coefficient for the effect of 29°C heat, at lag 0 in city i, stratum j
(Blacks or Whites), and
γ
Z
ij
is the AC prevalence in city i, stratum j. The expected
value of
ε
ij
is assumed zero, and the variance of
ε
ij
is represented as σ
ij
2
, where σ
ij
2
is the estimated standard error of
β
ij
within city and stratum, and σ is the heterogeneity
DISPARITIES BY RACE IN HEAT-RELATED MORTALITY 3 of 7
in the β
ij
not explained by AC prevalence. The C
0
and γ are estimated with inverse
variance-weighted least squares regression, and between-city variance σs were esti-
mated with iterative maximum likelihood estimation.
11
A random effect for city
accounted for heterogeneity among the four cities.
RESULTS
Environmental variables for the four cities were reported previously.
5
They all had
comparable maximum mean daily apparent temperatures (range =34.3–36.9 °C).
Mean levels of particles and other meteorological variables were also similar. About
40% of those who died in Detroit during the study period were Black; the corre-
sponding percentages were 28 in Chicago; 11 in Pittsburgh; and 4 in Minneapolis,
consistent with city demographics (Table 1).
In all four cities, central AC prevalence in the “White/Other” households
was more than double the central AC prevalence in Black households (Table 2).
Pittsburgh had the lowest overall prevalence of central AC, at 25%, and Minneapolis
the highest, at 47%. There was less variation by race in room-unit AC prevalence
and no consistent pattern of differences by race.
Table 3 summarizes city-specific heat effects by race (also reported in O’Neill
et al.
5
) and the pooled effect across the four cities. In each city, heat-associated mor-
tality was higher among Blacks, and the pooled effect showed an effect among
Blacks over twice that among Whites.
TABLE 1. Demographics of four metropolitan areas, 1986–1993
Chicago Detroit Minneapolis Pittsburgh
Total population (million) 5.11 2.11 1.52 1.34
Black (%) 26 40 5 11
TABLE 2. Air conditioning (AC) prevalence by household race
9
Prevalence statistics are means of the two survey years.
*Reporting one or more room-unit air conditioners.
†All households in the survey not reported as Black or Hispanic.
AC (%)
City Years Population Central Room unit*
Chicago 1987, 1991 Total 41 35
Blacks 16 32
Whites/Other49 35
Detroit 1989, 1993 Total 35 26
Blacks 17 30
Whites/Other 39 25
Minneapolis 1989, 1993 Total 47 26
Blacks 21 19
Whites/Other 48 27
Pittsburgh 1986, 1990 Total 25 33
Blacks 10 46
Whites/Other 26 33
4 of 7 O’NEILL ET AL.
In the meta-regression, for each 10% increase in central AC prevalence, heat-
associated mortality, pooled across all four cities, dropped by 1.4% (95% CI =−0.1
to 2.9), a marginally significant result. The overall effect of heat on mortality (the
effect of heat in a city with a 0% prevalence of central AC) was a 10.2% increase
(95% CI =4.5–16.2). Applying the 1.4% estimated drop in mortality to the average
difference in AC prevalence between Blacks and White/Other across all four cities
(24%) suggests that differences in central AC prevalence explain no more than a
3.4% difference in heat-related mortality. Blacks had 5.3% higher heat-related
mortality than Whites (Table 2); therefore, as much as 64% of this disparity is
potentially attributable to central AC prevalence.
Excess heat-related mortality with 0% room-unit AC prevalence was estimated
with meta-regression at 2.5% (95% CI=−13.6 to 21.7). Each 10% increase in
room-unit AC prevalence was associated with a 0.95% increase in heat-associated
mortality (95% CI =−4.4 to 6.5).
Because there was less of a gradient in room-unit AC prevalence and no consis-
tent pattern of disparities by race, this variable had limited utility in this analysis.
Figure shows central AC prevalence plotted against the coefficients reflecting the
size of the association between heat and mortality by city and race. Higher heat and
mortality associations and lower central AC prevalence were seen for Blacks. Cen-
tral AC prevalence varied little among Black households across the cities.
DISCUSSION
Heat-related mortality in four US cities was reduced with increasing central AC
prevalence, and substantially higher effects of heat on mortality were observed
among Blacks compared with Whites. A large proportion of the disparity in heat-
related mortality may be due to differences in central AC prevalence. Room-unit
AC prevalence showed little effect on heat-related mortality and no consistent pat-
tern of disparities by race.
Several previous studies showed both Black race and lack of AC as indicating
vulnerability to heat-related health effects.
1–6
Heat-related mortality associations
were higher in areas with lower AC prevalence, even after adjusting for latitude.
4
Access to AC has been recommended as a key component of efforts to prevent heat-
related deaths.
12–14
Among 72,420 US residents, hot-weather death rates from 1980
to 1985 were 42% lower among people with central AC compared with people
with no AC, and AC benefits were highest for women, the elderly, people not in the
labor force, and those in dwellings of less than six rooms.
6
Comparing room-unit
AC with no AC, the effect was not significantly different from zero, except among
TABLE 3. Percent change in daily mortality and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with
29 °C apparent temperature, pooled and city specific (1988–1993 for Chicago, 1986–1993 for
other cities)
Estimates are relative to 15 °C apparent temperature and control for barometric pressure, PM
10
, time trend,
day of week, and apparent temperature averaged over lags 1, 2, and 3 (heat effect is expressed for apparent
temperature lag 0).
Pooled Chicago Detroit Minneapolis Pittsburgh
Total mortality 4.6 (2.6–6.7) 4.5 (2.3–6.7) 7.5 (4.2–10.8) 2.4 (2.1 to 7.1) 3.1 (0.5 to 6.9)
Black 9.0 (5.3–12.8) 5.9 (2.0–9.9) 12.0 (6.8–17.4) 17.0 (7.8 to 48.4) 12.5 (1.4–24.8)
White 3.7 (1.9–5.4) 4.1 (1.5–6.7) 5.5 (1.4–9.7) 2.3 (2.4 to 7.1) 2.0 (1.7 to 6.0)
DISPARITIES BY RACE IN HEAT-RELATED MORTALITY 5 of 7
people whose dwellings had one to three rooms, where room-unit AC was benefi-
cial.
6
An inverse association between expected risk of death at 30 °C and prevalence
of central AC, with 33% of the variation in heat-associated mortality explained by
AC prevalence, was seen in 12 US cities.
10
Central AC prevalence is likely correlated with other area socioeconomic char-
acteristics indicating vulnerability to mortality on extreme temperature days
15
;
therefore, the explanatory power of this variable probably reflects influences of
these other factors. During a 1995 heat wave in Chicago, social contacts, mobility,
affordability of electricity, and sense of personal security affected whether people
had adequate ventilation and cooling in their homes.
16
These factors differed across
small-scale geographic areas (neighborhoods). The AC prevalence statistics used for
this study were aggregated by city, limiting conclusions about smaller-scale neigh-
borhood characteristics. Because room-unit AC prevalence patterns differed by city
and race, this study design was not able to provide insights into whether these units
are beneficial at the population level, though intuition would suggest that they
would be. Studies examining individual-level data on AC use and ownership would
be required to further evaluate this question.
Although the number of deaths occurring in the four cities was substantial, con-
fidence intervals for the meta-regression results were wide. Additionally, Figure
shows substantial scatter in the relationship between central AC prevalence and
the heat and mortality effect. For heat-related mortality among Whites, Pittsburgh
10 20 30 40 50
5
1.001.050
.
00.0
10 20 30 40 50
5
1.001.050
.
00.0
Percent AC prevalence
tneiciffeocytilatrom/taeH
Pittsburgh
Chicago
Detroit
Minneapolis
Pittsburgh
Detroit
Chicago
Minneapolis
FIGURE. Coefficients for the relative risk of mortality on days at 29 °C apparent temperature com-
pared with days at 15 °C, by prevalence of central air conditioning (AC), race, and city. , Whites
(and Whites/Others, for AC prevalence); , Blacks. Coefficients are from Poisson regression models
with covariates including barometric pressure, PM
10
, time trend, day of week, and apparent tem-
perature averaged over lags 1, 2, and 3 (heat effect is expressed for apparent temperature lag 0).
Data cover the period 1986–1993.
6 of 7 O’NEILL ET AL.
represented the greatest outlier in the group. The other three cities may be represen-
tative of US cities. Future analyses with more cities would help increase confidence
in the results.
In spite of these limitations, the findings of this study are consistent with previous
observations that central AC use is protective against heat-related mortality. They
also suggest that the strong racial disparities in heat-related mortality are partially
explained by central AC prevalence or other socioeconomic factors correlated with
central AC prevalence that differ by race. Outreach programs to reduce heat-
related mortality, which commonly include ensuring access to cool environments,
17
should take into account demographic patterns in AC prevalence to ensure equita-
ble protection.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grant 2 T32 ES07069-24).
Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily repre-
sent the official views of NIEHS, NIH. (Additional funding sources include grants
NIEHS ES00002 and EPAR827353.)
REFERENCES
1. Semenza JC, Rubin CH, Falter KH, et al. Heat-related deaths during the July 1995 heat
wave in Chicago. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:84–90.
2. Whitman S, Good G, Donoghue ER, Benbow N, Shou W, Mou S. Mortality in Chicago
attributed to the July 1995 heat wave. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1515–1518.
3. Greenberg JH, Bromberg J, Reed CM, Gustafson TL, Beauchamp RA. The epidemiology
of heat-related deaths, Texas – 1950, 1970–79, and 1980. Am J Public Health.
1983;73:805–807.
4. Curriero FC, Heiner KS, Samet JM, Zeger SL, Strug L, Patz JA. Temperature and mortal-
ity in 11 cities of the eastern United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:80–87.
5. O’Neill MS, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. Modifiers of the temperature and mortality associ-
ation in seven U.S. cities. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:1074–1082.
6. Rogot E, Sorlie PD, Backlund E. Air-conditioning and mortality in hot weather. Am J
Epi emiol. 1992;136:106–116.
7. Stieb DM, Judek S, Burnett RT. Meta-analysis of time-series studies of air pollution and
mortality: effects of gases and particles and the influence of cause of death, age, and sea-
son. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2002;52:470–484.
8. Brunekreef B, Holgate ST. Air pollution and health. Lancet. 2002;360:1233–1242.
9. US Census Bureau. The American Housing Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Commerce/U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; 1986–1993. Available
at: http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/h170.html. Accessed October, 2003.
10. Braga AL, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. The time course of weather related deaths. Epidemi-
ology. 2001;12:662–667.
11. Berkey CS, Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Colditz GA. A random-effects regression model for
meta-analysis. Stat Med. 1995;14:395–411.
12. CDC. Heat-wave-related mortality – Milwaukee, Wisconsin, July 1995. MMWR Morb
Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45:505–507.
13. Semenza JC. Acute renal failure during heat waves. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17:97.
14. Semenza JC, McCullough JE, Flanders WD, McGeehin MA, Lumpkin JR. Excess hospi-
tal admissions during the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago. Am J Prev Med.
1999;16:269–277.
DISPARITIES BY RACE IN HEAT-RELATED MORTALITY 7 of 7
15. O’Neill MS. Air conditioning and heat-related health effects. Appl Environ Sci Public
Health. 2003;1:9–12.
16. Klinenberg E. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University
of Chicago Press; 2002.
17. Smoyer-Tomic KE, Rainham DGC. Beating the heat: development and evaluation of a
Canadian hot weather health-response plan. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:1241–
1248.
... AC use can reduce mortality, hospitalizations, and morbidity due to heat-induced illness 35,36 . However, there is high inequality of AC ownership in the United States as well as globally 37,38 . In San Diego, there was a 15% increase in hospitalizations during hot weather in neighborhoods with less AC access, whereas no significant increase was found in places with higher AC access 39 . ...
Article
Full-text available
It is well-documented that people of color in the U.S. are disproportionately exposed to extreme urban heat. However, most studies have focused on large cities for one point in time, and less is known about how heat exposure changes over time in smaller cities. Here, we present a study of the changing nature of urban heat exposure and cooling strategies for ten cities in Connecticut in the U.S. Our results show that people of color experience more heat exposure and fewer adaptation strategies. They experienced higher overall temperatures, more extremely hot days, and larger increases in heat exposure. Also, they have lower air conditioning ownership rates and lower tree cover. Taken together, the results indicate that people of color are not only exposed to higher temperatures but also disproportionately exposed to increasing temperatures over time. With lower heat adaptation capacity, people of color are more vulnerable to increasing urban heat.
... Furthermore, extreme cold events can disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, such as low-income households and marginalized communities. These groups may have limited access to adequate heating, insulation, and cold-weather essentials, exacerbating the negative impacts of extreme cold (O'Neill et al., 2005). The uneven distribution of the burden of extreme cold can widen socioeconomic disparities within a county, undermining efforts to promote equitable and sustainable development. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the nonlinear effects of extreme temperatures on county-level sustainable development in China, addressing a critical gap in climate change impact research. Understanding this relationship is crucial for developing effective climate adaptation and mitigation strategies at the local level. China’s vast territory and diverse climate conditions are utilized as a natural experiment, given its position as the world’s largest developing economy and greenhouse gas emitter. We construct a novel county sustainability index encompassing five dimensions: human capital, natural capital, physical capital, financial capital, and social capital. Using panel data from 2000 to 2020 and a fixed effects model, we estimate the effect of temperature bins on sustainability. An inverted U-shaped relationship between temperature and sustainability is identified, with an optimal range between 6 and 12 °C. Agricultural counties show greater vulnerability to extreme heat, while non-agricultural counties are more affected by extreme cold. We identify agricultural mechanization, grain production, and labor productivity as key transmission channels. Our research contributes to understanding the complex climate-sustainability relationship, highlighting Chinese counties’ differential vulnerability to climate change. Evidence is provided for the development of targeted policies to mitigate the adverse impacts of extreme temperatures on sustainable development.
... These environmental exposures are often more intense in areas with lower socioeconomic status; on average, these areas have higher concentrations of air pollution (Bell & Ebisu, 2012;Hajat et al., 2013) and experience more extreme heat (Lehnert et al., 2020), often resulting from poor community design (Benz & Burney, 2021;Jesdale et al., 2013). People in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups in the United States are more likely to live in these areas as a result of historic and systemic factors (Bell & Ebisu, 2012;Benz & Burney, 2021;Jesdale et al., 2013), and are more likely to experience poor health and pregnancy outcomes from exposures to heat and air pollution (Bekkar et al., 2023;Dzekem et al., 2024;O'Neill, 2005;Spiller et al., 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Exposure to unfavorable environmental conditions during pregnancy, such as extreme heat and air pollution, has been linked to increased risk of stillbirth, defined as fetal mortality at or after 20 weeks’ gestation, however no studies have examined its association with social vulnerability. We examined associations between county-level stillbirth rates, environmental risk factors for stillbirth, and social vulnerability in the United States. Methods This ecologic study linked county-level data from three nationwide datasets on stillbirths (National Vital Statistics System), environmental conditions (North American Land Data Assimilation System and Environmental Protection Agency), and social vulnerability (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Social Vulnerability Index). Poisson and negative binomial models were fit to the variables and produced rate ratios to estimate associations among stillbirth rates, environmental risk factors, and social vulnerability. Results Social vulnerability was positively associated withn stillbirth rates, annual average number of extreme heat days, and ambient concentration of particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5). The average number of days that ozone and PM2.5 each exceeded regulatory standards were not associated with stillbirth rates or social vulnerability. A positive association between average annual PM2.5 concentration and stillbirth rates was detected; no other significant associations between environmental risk factors and stillbirth rates were observed. Discussion We found evidence of associations between social vulnerability and stillbirth rates, and between social vulnerability and environmental risk factors for stillbirth at the county level. Further research could inform understanding of how social vulnerability impacts the relationship between environmental exposures and stillbirth risk.
... For example, during an August 2003 heatwave in Portugal, the presence of AC in hospital wards facilitated patient survival (Nunes et al., 2011). Central AC has also been discerned to have a stronger protective effect against heat-related death than room air conditioners (O'Neill et al., 2005). ...
Article
Full-text available
Extreme heat events are more frequent and intense as a result of global climate change, thus posing tremendous threats to public health. However, extant literature exploring the multidimensional features of heat–health risks from a spatial perspective is limited. This study revisits extreme heat–health risk and decomposes this concept by integrating multi‐sourced datasets, identifying compositional features, examining spatial patterns, and comparing classified characteristics based on local conditions. Using Maryland as the focal point, we found that the components of heat–health risk are different from traditional risk dimensions (i.e., vulnerability, hazards, and exposure). Through a local‐level clustering analysis, heat–health risks were compared with areas having similar features, and among those with different features. The findings suggest a new perspective for understanding the socio‐environmental and socio‐spatial features of heat–health risks. They also offer an apt example of applying cross‐disciplinary methods and tools for investigating an ever‐changing phenomenon. Moreover, the spatial classification mechanism provides insights about the underlying causes of heat–health risk disparities and offers reference points for decision‐makers regarding identification of vulnerable areas, resource allocation, and causal inferences when planning for and managing extreme heat disasters.
... Low-income groups stand at an increased risk from the impacts of climate change [10,11] as they may lack access to essential heating or cooling systems in their houses, and even when available, the energy costs may be unaffordable [12,13]. Furthermore, the availability of energy is not consistent in some nations, exacerbating the issue [14]. ...
Article
Full-text available
In light of current climate change and global warming, indoor overheating poses a significant risk. Buildings in the Mediterranean climate heavily rely on natural ventilation to maintain acceptable indoor thermal conditions. This reliance poses an increased risk to built environments in this region, particularly those occupied by low-income populations who cannot afford conditioning systems. This study assesses the thermal performance of typical residential buildings in Lebanon in response to future climate change, considering various emission scenarios and climate zones. The study uses morphed future weather data and dynamic building simulations to assess indoor overheating and the potential for natural ventilation to establish comfortable indoor conditions. Findings indicate that indoor overheating occurrences in naturally ventilated apartments are expected to increase in both frequency and intensity in the future, across different emission scenarios, varying by climate. The risk of overheating was highest in inland region, followed by coastal then mountain regions. Regarding natural ventilation comfort hours, coastal climates saw a significant decrease (40% to 26% in the worst case), inland climates witnessed a slight reduction (27% to 23% in the worst case), and mountain climates observed a marginal increase (1% to 3%), accompanied by an increased risk of overheating during peak periods.
Chapter
This chapter considers how exposure and vulnerability work to shape the impacts of heatwaves across various scales. It begins by defining exposure as the extent to which an entity encounters heat, emphasizing the critical dimensions of frequency, duration, and intensity. To lend a geographical perspective to heat exposure the concept of heatwave climates is introduced, identifying regions where significant heatwave-related human mortality has been recorded, using the Köppen-Geiger climate classification as a framework. The chapter then explores vulnerability, defined as the propensity to be adversely affected, and outlines factors that determine vulnerability for human populations, including demographic, health, physical, socioeconomic, behavioural, and institutional factors. How socioeconomic factors, such as poverty and social isolation, may exacerbate heatwave related vulnerability is emphasised. Because smoothly functioning infrastructure is critical to society and economy and heatwaves can compromise the integrity of transportation, energy, and water systems, heatwave related vulnerability of infrastructure is also outlined with the issue of how failures in one system can cascade into others, exacerbating the overall impact of heatwaves highlighted. In addition to human populations, the chapter examines the vulnerability of natural systems. It discusses some of the factors that determine exposure and make terrestrial, marine, and aquatic ecosystems heatwave vulnerable, noting that the health status of these systems significantly affects their ability to withstand heat stress. The chapter concludes by emphasizing the need for further research on the determinants of heatwave exposure and vulnerability especially in the case of natural systems and infrastructure.
Article
Importance Extreme heat in the US is increasing due to climate change, while extreme cold is projected to decline. Understanding how extreme temperature along with demographic changes will affect population health is important for devising policies to mitigate the health outcome of climate change. Objective To assess the burden of extreme temperature–related deaths in the contiguous US currently (2008-2019) and estimate the burden in the mid–21st century (2036-2065). Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used historical (1979-2000) daily mean temperatures to calculate monthly extreme heat (>97.5th percentile value) and extreme cold days (<2.5th percentile value) for all contiguous US counties for 2008 to 2019 (current period). Temperature projections from 20 climate models and county population projections were used to estimate extreme temperature–related deaths for 2036 to 2065 (mid–21st century period). Data were analyzed from November 2023 to July 2024. Exposure Current monthly frequency of extreme heat days and projected mid–21st century frequency using 2 greenhouse gas emissions scenarios: Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP)2-4.5, representing socioeconomic development with a lower emissions increase, and SSP5-8.5, representing higher emissions increase. Main Outcomes and Measures Mean annual estimated number of extreme temperature–related excess deaths. Poisson regression model with county, month, and year fixed effects was used to estimate the association between extreme temperature and monthly all-cause mortality for older adults (aged ≥65 years) and younger adults (aged 18-64 years). Results Across the contiguous US, extreme temperature days were associated with 8248.6 (95% CI, 4242.6-12 254.6) deaths annually in the current period and with 19 348.7 (95% CI, 11 388.7-27 308.6) projected deaths in the SSP2-4.5 scenario and 26 574.0 (95% CI, 15 408.0-37 740.1) in the SSP5-8.5 scenario. The mortality data included 30 924 133 decedents, of whom 15 573 699 were males (50.4%), with 6.3% of Hispanic ethnicity, 11.5% of non-Hispanic Black race, and 79.3% of non-Hispanic White race. Non-Hispanic Black adults (278.2%; 95% CI, 158.9%-397.5%) and Hispanic adults (537.5%; 95% CI, 261.6%-813.4%) were projected to have greater increases in extreme temperature–related deaths from the current period to the mid–21st century period compared with non-Hispanic White adults (70.8%; 95% CI, −5.8% to 147.3%). Conclusions and Relevance This cross-sectional study found that extreme temperature–related deaths in the contiguous US were projected to increase substantially by mid–21st century, with certain populations, such as non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adults, projected to disproportionately experience this increase. The results point to the need to mitigate the adverse outcome of extreme temperatures for population health.
Article
What does it mean to build an equitable and just power system, and how do metrics used to assess energy justice affect the power industry? Across the world, countries are undergoing an energy transition. In the past, energy system build-out and operations have left some communities more heavily burdened than others (e.g., higher levels of air pollution or expensive energy bills).
Article
There is ample evidence that environmental justice communities experience high levels of extreme heat. However, it is unknown how disparities in urban heat exposure and adaptation options change over time. This study investigates socioeconomic disparities over time in urban heat exposure and adaptation options in eight mid-sized Northeastern cities. We ask: How were socioeconomic factors associated with heat exposure and adaptation options over time? We analyzed disparities at the census block group level and census block level, respectively. At the census block group level, we ran spatial regression models between socioeconomic variables, including race, income, gender, and age, and heat exposure and adaptation variables, including land surface temperature, normalized different vegetation index (NDVI), tree cover, and air conditioning ownership rate. We found that: Low median household income is always associated with high LST and low NDVI from 1990 to 2020; Low percentages of females are always associated with high LST and low NDVI from 1990 to 2020. High percentages of POC are associated with high LST in 2010 and 2020, but not in 1990 and 2000; Low median household income and low percentages of elderly are associated with lower tree covers; High percentages of POC, low percentages of elderly, and low median household income are associated with lower AC rates. In analysis at the census block level by city, we found that disparities in urban heat exposure between predominantly POC and predominantly white communities increased in most cities during 1990–2020. Predominantly POC communities consistently have lower vegetation cover over time in most cities. Disparities in vegetation cover per unit area increased in most cities, whereas disparities in vegetation cover per capita decreased in most cities. Our findings of the trends in disparities in heat exposure and adaptation are useful for forecasting disparities in the future. These findings also suggest that interventions should prioritize cities with increasing disparities in heat exposure and adaptation.
Article
Full-text available
Many meta-analyses use a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity among study results, beyond the variation associated with fixed effects. A random-effects regression approach for the synthesis of 2 x 2 tables allows the inclusion of covariates that may explain heterogeneity. A simulation study found that the random-effects regression method performs well in the context of a meta-analysis of the efficacy of a vaccine for the prevention of tuberculosis, where certain factors are thought to modify vaccine efficacy. A smoothed estimator of the within-study variances produced less bias in the estimated regression coefficients. The method provided very good power for detecting a non-zero intercept term (representing overall treatment efficacy) but low power for detecting a weak covariate in a meta-analysis of 10 studies. We illustrate the model by exploring the relationship between vaccine efficacy and one factor thought to modify efficacy. The model also applies to the meta-analysis of continuous outcomes when covariates are present.
Article
A cohort of 72,740 persons for whom information on household air-conditioning was available was monitored for mortality via the National Death Index from April 1980 through December 1985. A total of 2, 275 deaths occurred among the members of this cohort. The basic question addressed was whether persons in households with air-conditioning experienced lower death rates during hot weather than persons in households without air-conditioning. This question was examined for both central and room air-conditioning. The analysis was based on a state-by-state approach, that cross-tabulated deaths by air-conditioning status (yes or no) and average temperature during the month of death (<21.2°C (<70°F) or >21.2°C (>70°F)). The Mantel-Haenszel and sign tests were used to summarize the data. For central air-conditioning versus no air-conditioning, statistically significant benefits (p < 0.05, Mantel-Haenszel test) were observed for the overall total, for females, for persons not in the labor force, and for persons living in fewer than six rooms. These groups had more exposure to air-conditioning. The relative risk for the total group was 0.58, implying that in hot weather, the death rate for persons who had central air-conditioning was 42 percent lower than the rate for persons who did not have air-conditioning, after confounding variables had been controlled for. For room air-conditioning versus no air-conditioning, the odds ratio for the total group was 0.96, which was not significantly different from 1.0, suggesting that no real benefit was derived from room air-conditioning. Some reasons for the lack of a demonstrable benefit for room air-conditioning are given.
Article
On Thursday, July 13, 1995, Chicagoans awoke to a blistering day in which the temperature would reach 106 degrees. The heat index, which measures how the temperature actually feels on the body, would hit 126 degrees by the time the day was over. Meteorologists had been warning residents about a two-day heat wave, but these temperatures did not end that soon. When the heat wave broke a week later, city streets had buckled; the records for electrical use were shattered; and power grids had failed, leaving residents without electricity for up to two days. And by July 20, over seven hundred people had perished-more than twice the number that died in the Chicago Fire of 1871, twenty times the number of those struck by Hurricane Andrew in 1992—in the great Chicago heat wave, one of the deadliest in American history. Heat waves in the United States kill more people during a typical year than all other natural disasters combined. Until now, no one could explain either the overwhelming number or the heartbreaking manner of the deaths resulting from the 1995 Chicago heat wave. Meteorologists and medical scientists have been unable to account for the scale of the trauma, and political officials have puzzled over the sources of the city's vulnerability. In Heat Wave, Eric Klinenberg takes us inside the anatomy of the metropolis to conduct what he calls a "social autopsy," examining the social, political, and institutional organs of the city that made this urban disaster so much worse than it ought to have been. Starting with the question of why so many people died at home alone, Klinenberg investigates why some neighborhoods experienced greater mortality than others, how the city government responded to the crisis, and how journalists, scientists, and public officials reported on and explained these events. Through a combination of years of fieldwork, extensive interviews, and archival research, Klinenberg uncovers how a number of surprising and unsettling forms of social breakdown—including the literal and social isolation of seniors, the institutional abandonment of poor neighborhoods, and the retrenchment of public assistance programs—contributed to the high fatality rates. The human catastrophe, he argues, cannot simply be blamed on the failures of any particular individuals or organizations. For when hundreds of people die behind locked doors and sealed windows, out of contact with friends, family, community groups, and public agencies, everyone is implicated in their demise. As Klinenberg demonstrates in this incisive and gripping account of the contemporary urban condition, the widening cracks in the social foundations of American cities that the 1995 Chicago heat wave made visible have by no means subsided as the temperatures returned to normal. The forces that affected Chicago so disastrously remain in play in America's cities, and we ignore them at our peril.
Article
A cohort of 72,740 persons for whom information on household air-conditioning was available was monitored for mortality via the National Death Index from April 1980 through December 1985. A total of 2,275 deaths occurred among the members of this cohort. The basic question addressed was whether persons in households with air-conditioning experienced lower death rates during hot weather than persons in households without air-conditioning. This question was examined for both central and room air-conditioning. The analysis was based on a state-by-state approach, that cross-tabulated deaths by air-conditioning status (yes or no) and average temperature during the month of death (less than 21.2 degrees C (less than 70 degrees F) or greater than or equal to 21.2 degrees C (greater than or equal to 70 degrees F)). The Mantel-Haenszel and sign tests were used to summarize the data. For central air-conditioning versus no air-conditioning, statistically significant benefits (p less than 0.05, Mantel-Haenszel test) were observed for the overall total, for females, for persons not in the labor force, and for persons living in fewer than six rooms. These groups had more exposure to air-conditioning. The relative risk for the total group was 0.58, implying that in hot weather, the death rate for persons who had central air-conditioning was 42 percent lower than the rate for persons who did not have air-conditioning, after confounding variables had been controlled for. For room air-conditioning versus no air-conditioning, the odds ratio for the total group was 0.96, which was not significantly different from 1.0, suggesting that no real benefit was derived from room air-conditioning. Some reasons for the lack of a demonstrable benefit for room air-conditioning are given.
Article
A study of the deaths during a 1980 heat wave in Texas revealed death rates that were highest in males, the elderly, Blacks and those engaged in heavy labor, the latter two factors perhaps reflecting socioeconomic status. The data suggest that persistent high temperatures were related to death to a greater degree than the temperature peaks reached. Higher heat death rates in earlier years are believed to be attributable to the limited availability of air conditioning in those years.
Article
During a record-setting heat wave in Chicago in July 1995, there were at least 700 excess deaths, most of which were classified as heat-related. We sought to determine who was at greatest risk for heat-related death. We conducted a case-control study in Chicago to identify risk factors associated with heat-related death and death from cardiovascular causes from July 14 through July 17, 1995. Beginning on July 21, we interviewed 339 relatives, neighbors, or friends of those who died and 339 controls matched to the case subjects according to neighborhood and age. The risk of heat-related death was increased for people with known medical problems who were confined to bed (odds ratio as compared with those who were not confined to bed, 5.5) or who were unable to care for themselves (odds ratio, 4.1). Also at increased risk were those who did not leave home each day (odds ratio, 6.7), who lived alone (odds ratio, 2.3), or who lived on the top floor of a building (odds ratio, 4.7). Having social contacts such as group activities or friends in the area was protective. In a multivariate analysis, the strongest risk factors for heat-related death were being confined to bed (odds ratio, 8.2) and living alone (odds ratio, 2.3); the risk of death was reduced for people with working air conditioners (odds ratio, 0.3) and those with access to transportation (odds ratio, 0.3). Deaths classified as due to cardiovascular causes had risk factors similar to those for heat-related death. In this study of the 1995 Chicago heat wave, those at greatest risk of dying from the heat were people with medical illnesses who were socially isolated and did not have access to air conditioning. In future heat emergencies, interventions directed to such persons should reduce deaths related to the heat.