Molecular and Pharmacological Properties of a Potent and Selective Novel Nonsteroidal Progesterone Receptor Agonist Tanaproget

Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Journal of Biological Chemistry (Impact Factor: 4.57). 09/2005; 280(31):28468-75. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M504144200
Source: PubMed


Progesterone receptor (PR) agonists have several important applications in women's health, such as in oral contraception and post-menopausal hormone therapy. Currently, all PR agonists used clinically are steroids. Because of their interactions with other steroid receptors, steroid-metabolizing enzymes, or other steroid-signaling pathways, these drugs can pose significant side effects in some women. Efforts to discover novel nonsteroidal PR agonists with improved biological properties led to the discovery of tanaproget (TNPR). TNPR binds to the PR from various species with a higher relative affinity than reference steroidal progestins. In T47D cells, TNPR induces alkaline phosphatase activity with an EC(50) value of 0.1 nm, comparable with potent steroidal progestins such as medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and trimegestone (TMG), albeit with a reduced efficacy ( approximately 60%). In a mammalian two-hybrid assay to measure PR agonist-induced interaction between steroid receptor co-activator-1 and PR, TNPR showed similar potency (EC(50) value of 0.02 nm) and efficacy to MPA and TMG. Importantly, in key animal models such as the rat ovulation inhibition assay, TNPR demonstrates full efficacy and an enhanced progestational potency (30-fold) when compared with MPA and TMG. Furthermore, TNPR has relatively weak interactions with other steroid receptors and binding proteins and little effect on cytochrome P450 metabolic pathways. Finally, the three-dimensional crystal structure of the PR ligand binding domain with TNPR has been delineated to demonstrate how this nonsteroidal ligand achieves its high binding affinity. Therefore, TNPR is a structurally novel and very selective PR agonist with an improved preclinical pharmacological profile.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "The question rises thus whether the steroid receptors would display a similar LBD–DBD communication as was reported for the heterodimeric non-steroid receptors. First of all, while for the dimerization of steroid receptor LBDs (except for ER) very different formats have been proposed based on X-ray crystallography (Bledsoe et al., 2005, 2002; Zhang et al., 2005), most other data point at weak LBD-dimerizations at best. Steroid receptors bind to DNA as homodimers with their interacting DBDs in a near symmetrical head-to-head conformation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While the structures of the DNA- and ligand-binding domains of many nuclear receptors have been determined in great detail; the mechanisms by which these domains interact and possibly 'communicate' is still under debate. The first crystal structures of receptor dimers bound to ligand, DNA and coactivator peptides provided new insights in this matter. The observed binding modes revealed exciting new interaction surfaces between the different nuclear receptor domains. Such interfaces are proposed to be the route through which allosteric signals from the DNA are passed on to the ligand-binding domain and the activating functions of the receptor. The structural determinations of DNA-bound receptor dimers in solution, however, revealed an extended structure of the receptors. Here, we discuss these apparent contradictory structural data and their possible implications for the functioning of nuclear receptors.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2013 · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
  • Source
    • "For rat studies, the MPA dosage used was based on the IC50 of ovulation-inhibition in rats (0,1 mg kg−1 day−1) [36], to guarantee physiologically active concentrations, this concentration was multiplied tenfold (1 mg kg−1 day−1). Rats received a 90 day slow release pellet to ensure stable release. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clinical data suggest that progestins have chemopreventive properties in the development of colorectal cancer. We set out to examine a potential protective effect of progestins and progesterone signaling on colon cancer development. In normal and neoplastic intestinal tissue, we found that the progesterone receptor (PR) is not expressed. Expression was confined to sporadic mesenchymal cells. To analyze the influence of systemic progesterone receptor signaling, we crossed mice that lacked the progesterone receptor (PRKO) to the Apc(Min/+) mouse, a model for spontaneous intestinal polyposis. PRKO-Apc(Min/+) mice exhibited no change in polyp number, size or localization compared to Apc(Min/+). To examine effects of progestins on the intestinal epithelium that are independent of the PR, we treated mice with MPA. We found no effects of either progesterone or MPA on gross intestinal morphology or epithelial proliferation. Also, in rats treated with MPA, injection with the carcinogen azoxymethane did not result in a difference in the number or size of aberrant crypt foci, a surrogate end-point for adenoma development. We conclude that expression of the progesterone receptor is limited to cells in the intestinal mesenchyme. We did not observe any effect of progesterone receptor signaling or of progestin treatment in rodent models of intestinal tumorigenesis.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2011 · PLoS ONE
  • Source
    • "tures of the LBD of MR, GR, and AR complexed with an agonist ligand have been solved, and the contacts involved in activating these receptors have been identified (Matias et al., 2000; Bledsoe et al., 2002, 2005). The crystal structures of the human PRLBD associated with various progestins have also been solved (Williams and Sigler, 1998; Madauss et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005). Nevertheless, the contact(s) between progestins and the ligand-binding cavity that are required to trigger PR activation remained to be identified, as well as the structural elements that modulate progestin activity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many progestins have been developed for use in contraception, menopausal hormone therapy, and treatment of gynecological diseases. They are derived from either progesterone or testosterone, and they act by binding to the progesterone receptor (PR), a hormone-inducible transcription factor belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily. Unlike mineralocorticoid, glucocorticoid, and androgen receptors, the steroid-receptor contacts that trigger the switch of the ligand-binding domain from an inactive to an active conformation have not yet been identified for the PR. With this aim, we solved the crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of the human PR complexed with levonorgestrel, a potent testosterone-derived progestin characterized by a 13-ethyl substituent. Via mutagenesis analysis and functional studies, we identified Met909 of the helix 12 as the key residue for PR activation by both testosterone- and progesterone-derived progestins with a 13-methyl or a 13-ethyl substituent. We also showed that Asn719 contributes to PR activation by testosterone-derived progestins only, and that Met759 and Met909 are responsible for the high potency of 19-norprogestins and of 13-ethyl progestins, respectively. Our findings provide a structural guideline for the rational synthesis of potent PR agonist and antagonist ligands that could have therapeutic uses in women's health.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2009 · Molecular pharmacology
Show more