Article

A Meta-Analysis of Time-Series Studies of Ozone and Mortality With Comparison to the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study

School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 6.2). 08/2005; 16(4):436-45. DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000165817.40152.85
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Although many time-series studies of ozone and mortality have identified positive associations, others have yielded null or inconclusive results, making the results of these studies difficult to interpret.
We performed a meta-analysis of 144 effect estimates from 39 time-series studies, and estimated pooled effects by lags, age groups, cause-specific mortality, and concentration metrics. We compared results with pooled estimates from the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study (NMMAPS), a time-series study of 95 large U.S. urban centers from 1987 to 2000.
Both meta-analysis and NMMAPS results provided strong evidence of a short-term association between ozone and mortality, with larger effects for cardiovascular and respiratory mortality, the elderly, and current-day ozone exposure. In both analyses, results were insensitive to adjustment for particulate matter and model specifications. In the meta-analysis, a 10-ppb increase in daily ozone at single-day or 2-day average of lags 0, 1, or 2 days was associated with an 0.87% increase in total mortality (95% posterior interval = 0.55% to 1.18%), whereas the lag 0 NMMAPS estimate is 0.25% (0.12% to 0.39%). Several findings indicate possible publication bias: meta-analysis results were consistently larger than those from NMMAPS; meta-analysis pooled estimates at lags 0 or 1 were larger when only a single lag was reported than when estimates for multiple lags were reported; and heterogeneity of city-specific estimates in the meta-analysis were larger than with NMMAPS.
This study provides evidence of short-term associations between ozone and mortality as well as evidence of publication bias.

  • Source
    • "Les concentrations mesurées dépassent régulièrement les seuils d'alertes fixés par l'Union européenne (figure 3) pour ce gaz nocif, qui, à concentration élevée, affecte la capacité respiratoire des personnes les plus vulnérables (Bell et al., 2005) et diminue la productivité des cultures. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mise à jour des connaissances concernant tant l'ozone troposphérique et ses conséquences sur la pollution l'ozone stratosphérique et l'effet de serre des CFcs et substituts. Present situation of the ozone in the troposphere and its impcat on pollution, and the stratospheric ozone and the role of CFCs and HFCs as greenhouse gas.
    Full-text · Book · Oct 2015
  • Source
    • "Long-term exposure to high levels of ozone (O 3 ) has been linked to increased risk of respiratory illness, while chronic exposure to elevated fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) is associated with lung cancer, respiratory disease, and cardiovascular disease (e.g., Dockery et al., 1993; Jerrett et al., 2009; Krewski et al., 2009; Pope III et al., 2009). In addition to these consistently documented risks of chronic exposure, there is some evidence that acute exposures to pollution may themselves carry risks to human health above and beyond those of the long-term mean exposures (Bell et al., 2005). Thus, high pollution events may be responsible for a larger fraction of annual acute mortality. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Air pollution variability is strongly dependent on meteorology. However, quantifying the impacts of changes in regional climatology on pollution extremes can be difficult due to the many non-linear and competing meteorological influences on the production, transport, and removal of pollutant species. Furthermore, observed pollutant levels at many sites show sensitivities at the extremes that differ from those of the overall mean, indicating relationships that would be poorly characterized by simple linear regressions. To address this challenge, we apply quantile regression to observed daily ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) levels and reanalysis meteorological fields in the United States over the past decade to specifically identify the meteorological sensitivities of higher pollutant levels. From an initial set of over 1700 possible meteorological indicators (including 28 meteorological variables with 63 different temporal options) we generate reduced sets of O3 and PM2.5 indicators for both summer and winter months, analyzing pollutant sensitivities to each for response quantiles ranging from 2–98%. Primary drivers of high-quantile O3 levels include temperature and relative humidity in the summer, while winter O3 levels are most commonly associated with incoming radiation flux. Drivers of summer PM2.5 include temperature, wind speed, and tropospheric stability at many locations, while stability, humidity, and planetary boundary layer height are the key drivers most frequently associated with winter PM2.5. We find key differences in driver sensitivities across regions and quantiles. For example, we find nationally averaged sensitivities of 95th percentile summer O3 to changes in maximum daily temperature of approximately 0.9 ppb °C−1, while the sensitivity of 50th percentile summer O3 (the annual median) is only 0.6 ppb °C−1. This gap points to differing sensitivities within various percentiles of the pollutant distribution, highlighting the need for statistical tools capable of identifying meteorological impacts across the entire response spectrum.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Source
    • "Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) and ground-level ozone (O 3 ) are important criteria air pollutants. A number of epidemiological studies suggest an association between short-and long-term exposure to SO 2 , NO 2 and O 3 and increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital admissions for cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases including acute myocardial infarction and arrhythmias (Künzli et al., 1997; Burnett et al., 1998, 1999, 2004; Stieb et al., 2002; Bell et al., 2005; Ruidavets et al., 2005; Dockery et al., 2005; Neuberger et al., 2007; Latza et al., 2009). They are also associated with acid deposition and photochemical smog (Cooper and Alley, 2002; Cox, 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A field performance evaluation of Maxxam passive samplers was carried out for ambient concentrations of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ground-level ozone (O3). Monthly passive and hourly continuous air monitoring data from four regional air monitoring networks in Alberta, Canada were evaluated over a 5-year period (2006–2010). Monthly concentrations were relatively low, ranging from 0.1 to 3.9 ppb, 0.2 to 18.1 ppb and 10.1 to 56.1 ppb for SO2, NO2 and O3, respectively. From duplicate passive sampling, geometric mean precision values were 17.9%, 14.8% and 4.7% for SO2, NO2 and O3, respectively. Geometric mean of the relative error (as a measure of accuracy) was 30% (median = 33%, interquartile range, IQR 15–63%) for SO2 and 32% (median = 33%, IQR = 25–64%) for NO2. O3 measurements had a better measure of accuracy with a geometic mean relative error of 12% (median = 17%, IQR = 9–30%) and met the acceptable level recommended by United States National Institute of Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the European Union (EU) Directive (±25%). From reduced major axis (RMA) analysis, bias (systematic error) is apparent in the Maxxam passive samplers in the field resulting in overestimation of ambient SO2 and O3 concentrations and underestimation of NO2 concentrations relative to continuous analyzers. Seasonal influences were observed for accuracy of passive SO2 and O3 measurements. A poor association was found between passive versus continuous concentrations for SO2 and O3 during the winter and the summer, respectively.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · Atmospheric Environment
Show more