Article

Modeling Clinical Outcome of Children With Autistic Spectrum Disorders

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Filadelfia, Pennsylvania, United States
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.47). 07/2005; 116(1):117-22. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1118
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) have variable developmental outcomes, for reasons that are not entirely clear. The objective of this study was to test the clinical observation that initial developmental parameters (degree of atypicality and level of intelligence) are a major predictor of outcome in children with ASD and to develop a statistical method for modeling outcome on the basis of these parameters.
A retrospective chart review was conducted of a child development program at a tertiary center for the evaluation of children with developmental disabilities. All children who had ASD, were seen by J.C. between July 1997 and December 2002, met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for autism or pervasive developmental disorder (referred to hereafter as ASD), had undergone at least 1 administration of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), and had at least 1 determination of developmental quotient (DQ) or IQ (N = 91) were studied. The sample was 92.3% male and 80.2% white.
The DSM-IV was used to confirm that each patient met criteria for a diagnosis of autism or pervasive developmental disorder. The CARS was used to quantify the severity of expression of ASD. Age at evaluation, CARS score, and DQ or IQ at each visit were extracted from the medical record. The 2 independent sample t test or the Mann-Whitney test was used for comparing CARS and age between 2 groups: first recorded DQ or IQ <0.70 (n = 58) versus first recorded DQ or IQ >or=0.70 (n = 33). Associations among CARS score, IQ or DQ, and age were examined using Pearson or Spearman correlation. A mixed-effect model was used for expressing the multivariate model. Length of follow-up (period) was calculated by subtracting age in months at initial evaluation from age in months at each follow-up evaluation. Therefore, at first evaluation, period = 0. Period was considered as a random effect because collection of repeated information from patients was not uniform. The predictive relationships among CARS, age at first evaluation, period, and DQ or IQ group (<0.70 and >or=0.70) were examined using a mixed-effects model. Variables that were expressed as percentage change between first and last measurements were analyzed using the t test or the Mann-Whitney test. Socioeconomic status was assessed using Hollingshead criteria.
All patients met DSM-IV criteria for ASD. Mean age at initial evaluation was 46.2 months (SD: 23.7; range: 20.0-167.3 months). Mean CARS score at initial evaluation was 36.1 (SD: 6.3; range: 21.5-48). Mean DQ or IQ at initial evaluation was 0.65 (SD: 0.20; range: 0.16-1.10). There was no significant difference in socioeconomic status between DQ/IQ groups. CARS scores among children with an initial DQ or IQ <0.70 showed no significant decrement with time. In contrast, CARS scores among children with an initial DQ or IQ >or=0.70 showed a significant decrement with time, which could be modeled by the formula CARS = 37.93 - [(0.12 x age in months at first visit) + (0.23 x period)]. The predicted CARS scores generated by this model correlated with the observed values (r = 0.71) and explained 50% of the variability in the CARS scores for this group.
These data provide preliminary validation of a statistical model for clinical outcome of ASD on the basis of 3 parameters: age, degree of atypicality, and level of intelligence. This model, if replicated in a prospective, population-based sample that is controlled for treatment modalities, will enhance our ability to offer a prognosis for the child with ASD and will provide a benchmark against which to judge the putative benefits of various treatments for ASD. Our model may also be useful in etiologic and epidemiologic studies of ASD, because different causes of ASD are likely to follow different developmental trajectories along these 3 parameters.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Abbas F Jawad
  • Source
    • "IQ is a standardized, norm-referenced measure of human intelligence that is frequently reported as an outcome measure of ASD interventions (Eldevik et al. 2009; Perry et al. 2011; Virues-Ortega 2010). While IQ does not encompass the full complexity of ASD, it has been shown to account for some of the heterogeneity seen in this condition (Munson et al. 2008) and has been incorporated into models of clinical outcomes (Coplan and Jawad 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Novel management strategies for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) propose providing interventions before diagnosis. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the costs and dependency-free life years (DFLYs) generated by pre-diagnosis intensive Early Start Denver Model (ESDM-I); pre-diagnosis parent-delivered ESDM (ESDM-PD); and the Ontario Status Quo (SQ). The analyses took government and societal perspectives to age 65. We assigned probabilities of Independent, Semi-dependent or Dependent living based on projected IQ. Costs per person (in Canadian dollars) were ascribed to each living setting. From a government perspective, the ESDM-PD produced an additional 0.17 DFLYs for $8600 less than SQ. From a societal perspective, the ESDM-I produced an additional 0.53 DFLYs for $45,000 less than SQ. Pre-diagnosis interventions targeting ASD symptoms warrant further investigation.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Source
    • "One could create alternative standardized scores derived from raw scores below the ''floor'' for frequently used IQ tests (Hessl et al. 2009), but many individuals with low cognitive abilities are unable to achieve any points on tests with a lower age limit around school-age. Some researchers have used standard and ratio scores interchangeably (Sigman and McGovern 2005; Turner et al. 2006), including using standard scores from measures such as the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales instead of traditionally defined cognitive tests (Coplan and Jawad 2005; Howlin et al. 2014). This practice has little empirical support, particularly in older samples, although it is compelling to consider adaptive behavior given its relevance to the diagnosis of ID. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nonverbal IQ (NVIQ) was examined in 84 individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) followed from age 2 to 19. Most adults who scored in the range of intellectual disability also received scores below 70 as children, and the majority of adults with scores in the average range had scored in this range by age 3. However, within the lower ranges of ability, actual scores declined from age 2 to 19, likely due in part to limitations of appropriate tests. Use of Vineland-II daily living skills scores in place of NVIQ did not statistically improve the correspondence between age 2 and age 19 scores. Clinicians and researchers should use caution when making comparisons based on exact scores or specific ability ranges within or across individuals with ASD of different ages.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
    • "One could create alternative standardized scores derived from raw scores below the ''floor'' for frequently used IQ tests (Hessl et al. 2009), but many individuals with low cognitive abilities are unable to achieve any points on tests with a lower age limit around school-age. Some researchers have used standard and ratio scores interchangeably (Sigman and McGovern 2005; Turner et al. 2006), including using standard scores from measures such as the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales instead of traditionally defined cognitive tests (Coplan and Jawad 2005; Howlin et al. 2014). This practice has little empirical support, particularly in older samples, although it is compelling to consider adaptive behavior given its relevance to the diagnosis of ID. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: IQ has been studied as an important factor in predicting both current and future functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, relatively little is known about longitudinal measurement and stability of IQ, particularly in children who span the full range of cognitive ability. Objectives: To assess the stability of nonverbal IQ scores in a cognitively heterogeneous sample of individuals with ASD from toddlerhood to young adulthood. Methods: A sample of 84 children diagnosed with ASD at age 2 years was tested again at age 3 and then followed through age 18. At each assessment, participants were administered developmentally-appropriate tests to obtain estimates of cognitive functioning either through standard IQ scores, if possible, or ratio-derived developmental quotients (DQs). Results: Nonverbal IQ/DQ scores generally declined from 2 to 18 for the majority of individuals with ASD in the sample. While age 2 scores were predictive (R2=.44), age 3 scores were slightly more predictive (R2=.55). However, at both ages, relationships were generally stronger for individuals with lower nonverbal IQ/DQ. At age 2, R2 = 0.35 for children with NVIQ/DQ < 70, while R2 = 0.08 for children with NVIQ/DQ ≥70. At age 3, R2 = 0.26 for children with NVIQ/DQ < 70, and R2 = 0.17 for children with NVIQ/DQ ≥70. Broad score divisions (e.g., IQ/DQ over vs. under 70) showed relatively high stability, whereas narrower DSM-IV-based ability ranges (e.g., Borderline, Mild MR, etc.) were much less stable over time. At age 2, children were distributed as follows: Average (NVIQ/DQ ≥ 85, n = 17), Borderline (NVIQ/DQ ≥ 70, n = 26), and the remainder (n = 41) fell into the ID range. Twenty-one were in the moderate to profound category (NVIQ/DQ< 50). At age 18, when 67% of the sample required use of a test outside of its standardized age range, the number of participants with NVIQ/DQ < 50 jumped to 45, while the Average (n = 21) and Borderline (n = 9) groups declined. Use of Vineland-II Daily Living Skills scores in place of nonverbal IQ/DQ scores at the age 18 time point did not improve the predictive validity of age 2 scores (R2=.41). Conclusions: These findings indicate that most children with ASD who exhibit significant nonverbal cognitive “delays” as young children score in the range of intellectual disability as adults. On the other hand, the majority of individuals with nonverbal IQ scores in the average range or above by age 3 tended to continue to score in the average range or above at age 18. Particularly within the lower ranges of ability, this study indicates that “absolute” nonverbal IQ scores of individuals with ASD decline from age 2 to 18. However, limitations of available and appropriate tests may be significant factors in this decline, as well as growth in verbal skills during this time period. Clinicians and researchers should use caution when making comparisons based on absolute scores or specific ability ranges within or across individuals with ASD of different ages.
    No preview · Conference Paper · May 2014
Show more