Content uploaded by Eric Buch
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Eric Buch on Jun 26, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
The future of health care in Africa
Depends on making commitments work in and outside Africa
A
s the group of eight leading industrialised
nations (G8) meets for its summit at
Gleneagles, Scotland, next week Africa is at a
crossroads. It faces a double edged crisis: its healthcare
workforce is rapidly depleting, and its health systems
are weak, fragile, and hanging on a precipice. A direct
consequence of this is that the indicators for health
development in the continent are dismal. About one in
six African children die before their fifth birthday, with
half of these dying from diseases preventable by
vaccines; and one woman dies every two minutes from
complications of pregnancy and delivery.
1
From all
such indications and current evidence, it would appear
that very few countries in the continent will achieve the
millennium development goals.
2
The goal to reduce
deaths among children aged under 5 (figure) is just
one example.
Chronic underinvestment, interventions by global
partnerships that focus only on single diseases, and
sporadic financing by both national governments and
their partners have left African health systems
prostrate. They are unable to deliver drugs, tools, and
other interventions of proved effectiveness against the
leading causes of early death and illness throughout
the continent. The apparently unabating national and
household poverty in Africa is widely debated, and yet,
despite the substantial growth in the global economy
over the past half century, most of Africa remains poor.
The living conditions are not conducive to good
health, and people are without access to the
inexpensive drugs and medicines that have proved
efficacious and beneficial.
3
The world can no longer
ignore Africa and its people, and commitments to
reverse this unacceptable trend are now at centre stage.
Interventions in health policy will be just as important
as efforts to move forward Africa’s social and economic
development agenda.
The diversity and complexity of healthcare
systems in Africa mean that mag ic bullets or “one size
fits all” approaches are doomed to fail. Such
approaches have not achieved success and, anyway,
cannot be sustained at the current fiscal capacity. Sus-
tainable financing from national budgets and real
increases in overseas development assistance to Africa
are critical if the continent is to join the rest of the
world in improving global health and continuing the
marked fall in mor tality among children since 1960
seen elsewhere.
There is strong evidence that Africa has risen to
this challenge. The health strategy of the New Partner-
ship for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) outlines
actions that are to be taken by Afr ican countries in the
renewed spirit of partnership and collaboration. The
strategy identifies key actions to strengthen health sys-
tems, improve partnership and communication with
communities, and focus local action on the leading
burdens in Africa
—
malaria, HIV/AIDS, and obstetric
emergencies. African governments have signed up to
the NEPAD health strategy,
4
and increasingly govern-
ments are allocating at least 15% of their total budgets
to health care in compliance with the Abuja target
agreed in 2003.
5
The implementation of this commitment by
African governments is being monitored closely by the
African Union, and the union has called on the
international community to fill the $19bn (£10bn;
€16bn) gap in health financing that the World Health
Organization has determined that Africa is unable to
self finance.
6
The union is also making concerted
efforts to expand the options for healthcare financing
and to engage the private sector in innovative partner-
ships that can deliver basic healthcare services to Afri-
can families and households. The Commission for
Africa, consulting widely on health issues, heard the
voice of the continent. It is not surprising, therefore,
that the commission’s report has much in common
with the key regional strategies within Africa to
improve health systems and outcomes.
Year
Source: World Bank
Deaths per 1000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
0
100
150
200
50
Path to goal
Sub-Saharan Africa
Low income
Middle income
Projected progress at current rate
Progress to date
Progress in reducing mortality in children aged under 5 years,
comparing sub-Saharan Africa with low and middle income countries
in the rest of the world. Red represents sub-Saharan Africa, blue low
income countries, green middle income countries (with solid lines
indicating path to goal, dotted lines progress to date, and dashed
lines projected progress at current rate)
Saturday 2 July 2005
B
MJ
BMJ 2005;331:1–2
1BMJ VOLUME 331 2 JULY 2005 bmj.com
The report of the Commission for Africa has tried
to chart the way forward, calling for an additional
increase in overseas development assistance of up to
$25bn a year by 2010, and a further investment of the
same amount by 2015, subject to a review of progress.
The report provides bold and innovative targets to
which members of the G8 and others are expected to
commit at their summit this week. The report is
labelled by some the Marshall plan for Africa, a
reference to the European recovery programme
followed by the United States for the reconstruction of
Europe after the second world war and named after
the former US secretary of state George Marshall.
The commission’s report rightly identifies strength-
ened health systems, good governance, peace, and
security as central to the efforts to stem Africa’s down-
ward spiral. It also acknowledges the importance of
partnerships supporting pan-African institutions and
regional organisations, and a framework that recog-
nises the need for partners to respond to both regional
and national priorities. The commission urges that
immediate attention is given to the deficits in Africa’s
health workforce, information and management
systems, and essential medicines and other health
commodities; it also highlights the need for invest-
ments to follow the NEPAD health strategy and invest
in regional institutions.
Health workers comprise the core of the healthcare
system in Africa. Several groups have called on the G8
to invest in Africa’s efforts to stem the brain drain and
to produce the right multidisciplinary workforce to
improve the performance of health systems and meet
regional and global targets for health. Africa does not
simply need more health workers; inv estments must
also help to increase the motivation, retention, and
accessibility of the workforce to make a real difference.
Regional cooperation is crucial to solving the human
resources crisis. This could include support for “brain
sharing” between the nations in the region that produce
health workers, such as South Africa and Nigeria; nego-
tiation of expansion in fiscal space (the flexibility of
financial management often restricted by conditions of
loans and grants) in national budgets; and technical
cooperation in medical education and training.
In addition, many public-private par tnerships in
Africa are starting
—
with variable success
—
to expand
access to medicines, health commodities, and services.
This expansion includes franchising of health services,
outsourcing, and cooperative arrangements for pooled
procurement and distribution of medicines and other
commodities. Such models may be useful, but to
sustain any initial gains and reverse the continent’s
poor record on health and development, African insti-
tutions will need global support to track achievements;
learn lessons; document success; produce and manage
knowledge; and share vision and experiences.
As the leaders in the industrial w orld meet this week
to focus on Africa and deliberate on its future, they must
go beyond the traditional strategy of counting numbers
and examine the critical shifts in thinking that are
required to make any greater investment succeed and
mov e the continent forward. Increasingly , that success
will depend on partners being willing and able to
respond to the priorities of national governments and
regional institutions in Africa. The commitments are
pouring in, and Africa is once again the focus of global
attention. But much still needs to be accomplished.
Lola Dare executive secretary
African Council for Sustainable Health Development (ACOSHED),
29 Aare Avenue, New Bodja Estate, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
(L.Dare.acoshed@yahoo.com)
Eric Buch health adviser
New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), Midrand,
Pretoria, South Africa
Competing interests: None declared.
1 Unicef. The state of the world’s children: childhood under threat. New York:
Unicef, 2005.
2 Hecht R. Achieving the health mid decade goals—investing in health. Forum 6,
Global Forum for Health Research, 12-15 November 2002, Arusha, Tan-
zania [conference presentation].
3 Commission for Africa. Our common interest. London: Commission for
Africa, 2005.
4 New Partnership for Africa’s Development. Health strategy. Midrand:
NEPAD Secretariat, 2003.
5 African Union. The Abuja Declaration on HIV/AIDS and other related infec-
tious diseases. (At the African Summit on HIV/AIDS, TB and other related
infectious diseases, Abuja 26-27 April, 2003). www.uneca.org/adf2000/
Abuja%20Declaration.htm (accessed 27 Jun 2005).
6 African Union. Decisions and declarations. Decisions on the interim report on
HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and polio. Assembly of the African Union,
4th ordinary session, 30-31 January 2005, Abuja, Nigeria. Addis Ababa:
African Union, 2005.
Stopping Africa’s medical brain drain
The rich countries of the North must stop looting doctors and nurses from
developing countries
A
frica will be the major focus of the G8 summit in
Gleneagles next week, and rightly so. Nearly 11
million children aged under 5 years are dying
every year worldwide from treatable diseases. Most of
them are living in developing countries, with more than
four million of these deaths in sub-Saharan Africa.
1
Along with the disastrous effects of warfare, HIV/AIDS is
wiping out young adults and leaving frail, malnourished
children in the care of their siblings and grandparents.
It is difficult to see how the countries of sub-Saharan
Africa can dev elop economically and politically when
such large proportions of their adult populations are liv-
ing with chronic diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculo-
sis, malaria, and other tropical diseases. Antiretroviral
drugs could make a dramatic difference, and so could
appropriate aid. Although the dev eloped countries of
the North are giving aid with one hand, they are robbing
African countries with the other by siphoning off their
most precious resource
—
trained doctors and nurses.
The Commonw ealth’s developing countries are particu-
larly hard hit because their health professionals speak
English and are therefore a valuable commodity to plug
manpow er gaps in the United States, Canada, the United
Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia.
Editorials
BMJ 2005;331:2–3
2 BMJ VOLUME 331 2 JULY 2005 bmj.com