Efficacy of Multilayered Hosiery in Reducing In-Shoe Plantar Foot Pressure in High-Risk Patients With Diabetes

Diabetes Foot Clinic, Disablement Services Centre, Withington Hospital, Cavendish Road, Manchester M20 1LB, UK.
Diabetes Care (Impact Factor: 8.42). 08/2005; 28(8):2001-6. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.8.2001
Source: PubMed


High plantar pressure is an acknowledged risk factor in the development of plantar ulcers in the diabetic neuropathic foot. This study examines the ability of preventive foot care (PFC) socks to reduce plantar foot pressures in a sample of high-risk patients with diabetes.
Nineteen patients with established peripheral neuropathy attending a complications clinic of the Manchester Diabetes Centre were recruited to the study. Fifteen (78%) of the patients were male, 40-80 years of age, and ulcer-free at the time of recruitment. In-shoe plantar pressure measurements were recorded using the F-Scan and compared PFC socks with ordinary supermarket socks. The analysis measured differences in maximum foot contact area and plantar pressure for the whole foot, forefoot, and peak plantar pressure areas.
The results showed a significant increase in maximum foot contact area of 11 cm2 (95% CI 7-11) when subjects wore the PFC socks (P < 0.01). This was accompanied by 5.4 kPa (3.5-7.3) or 9% reduction in total foot pressure (P < 0.01). Similar results were observed at the forefoot, which showed a 14.2% increase in contact area and a 10.2% reduction in peak forefoot pressure.
These results suggest that the wearing of PFC socks increases the underfoot contact area and hence decreases plantar foot pressures. Further studies are required to determine whether the pressure and friction reductions achieved by this simple intervention would be effective in reducing the incidence of foot ulcers in high-risk patients.

Download full-text


Available from: Carine H M van Schie, Jan 14, 2016
  • Source
    • "valid) and reliable estimate of the true in-shoe plantar pressures, data from multiple footsteps are generally collected, often in multiple walking trials. However, the precise number of collected steps per foot is often not reported and may vary considerably, from as few as three steps (Garrow et al. 2005) to as many as 30–40 steps (Owings et al. 2008). Too few collected footsteps may compromise data quality. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dynamic in-shoe plantar pressure assessment is used both in research and clinical practice to evaluate therapeutic footwear interventions in neuropathic diabetic patients. The aim was to determine the required number of footsteps for reliable and valid in-shoe plantar pressure data in these patients. In 30 neuropathic diabetic patients wearing custom-made therapeutic footwear, in-shoe plantar pressures were measured for a minimum of 20 midgait walking steps per foot. For each incremental number of steps and for each of six anatomical regions per foot, peak pressure, pressure-time integral, contact area, contact time, and force-time integral were calculated. Reliability was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. Validity was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation between each n-step protocol and the 20-step reference protocol based on Limits of Agreement analysis. Data was considered reliable with intraclass correlation coefficients >0.90 and valid with coefficients of variation <10%. Three steps per foot were required to obtain reliable data for each foot region and parameter. Depending on the parameter, between 7 and 17 steps per foot were required to obtain valid data. With the exception of deviant outcomes in three forefoot regions for force-time integral, overall 12 steps per foot were required for valid data. For neuropathic diabetic patients wearing custom-made therapeutic footwear, 12 midgait steps per foot are required to obtain valid and reliable in-shoe plantar pressure data. This provides directions for the use of in-shoe plantar pressure analysis in research and clinical practice in this patient group.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2011 · Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Department of Biomedical Engineering. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Case Western Reserve University, 2007. Includes bibliographical references. Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader for viewing.
    Preview · Article ·
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Not Available
    Preview · Conference Paper · Feb 1993
Show more