Sustainability of Community Coalitions: An Evaluation of Communities That Care
Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, 402 Marion Place, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. Prevention Science
(Impact Factor: 3.15).
10/2005; 6(3):199-202. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-005-0003-4
The relationships between community coalition processes during initial 3-year state seed funding and markers of sustainability post-funding were investigated in 20 Communities That Care (CTC) sites in Pennsylvania. Coalition processes were assessed using interviews with coalition members, ratings from the research team and ratings from state technical consultants. We found members' knowledge of prevention, coalition internal functioning, and fidelity to the CTC model during early coalition functioning predictive of later sustained coalition board activity. Findings suggest domains of early coalition functioning that may be important for understanding and promoting sustainability.
Available from: epress.lib.uts.edu.au
- "Public health literature examines sustainability mostly from the viewpoint of maintaining specific health programs, such as health initiatives, or retaining knowledge, capacity and values generated from the collaboration (Bryant 2002; Israel et al. 2006; Paine-Andrews et al. 2000; Shediac-Rizkallah & Bone 1998). Less attention is given to sustaining the partnership itself (Gomez, Greenberg & Feinberg 2005; Israel et al. 2001), and investigating partnership sustainability through empirical evidence is also not granted the attention it deserves (Israel et al. 2001). A few studies have examined theoretical perspectives of sustainability. "
Available from: Brian K. Bumbarger
- "In addition to community readiness, the extant literature suggests that collaborations with local coalitions also may impact intervention sustainability (Altman 1995; Greenberg 2004; Hawkins et al. 2002; Spoth et al. 2004). Research on Communities That Care (CTC; Hawkins et al. 2002), a model that utilizes community coalitions in order to assess community intervention needs and implement appropriate evidence-based interventions, indicates that CTC coalitions are sustainable and increase the adoption and implementation of evidencebased programs (CTC; Gomez et al. 2005; Hawkins et al. 2002). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study examined factors associated with the predicted and actual post-funding sustainability of evidence-based interventions implemented as part of the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency's Research-Based Delinquency and Violence Prevention Initiative. Correlates of predicted post-funding sustainability included program staff, overall school support, and school administrator support. Additionally, predicted post-funding sustainability was strongly associated with actual post-funding sustainability. Other correlates of actual post-funding sustainability included financial sustainability planning and aligning the intervention with the goals of the agency/school. Five years post-funding 33% of the interventions were no longer operating, 22% were operating at a reduced level, and 45% were operating at the same level or a higher level than the final year of funding. These findings are discussed in terms of implications for increasing intervention sustainability, as well as implications for future research on intervention sustainability.
Available from: Darrin Hicks
- "Yet in the CHCI (Larson et al. 2002), a strong relationship between process quality and success and sustainability of community initiatives was discovered 10 years after the initiatives began. Gomez et al.'s (2005) longitudinal study of the Communities That Care Coalitions (CTC) in Pennsylvania also found that coalition sustainability was related to early coalition function. Both of these studies suggest that the perceived quality of the collaborative partnership in its formative stages is related to the success and sustainability of the collaborative partnership several years later. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Though collaboration is often required in community initiatives, little evidence documents relationships between collaboration and program success. The authors contend that clarification of the construct collaboration is necessary for investigating its contribution to the success of community initiatives. After respecifying collaboration, they present a study of a multisite program that involved varying degrees of collaboration in the 16 communities adopting a nurse home visitation program. The authors employ hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to test the predictive power of individual participant characteristics and examine the increased accuracy of predictions from a second level model of site qualities--specifically, features of the collaborative process associated with different sites. The first-level model predicted approximately 10% of the variance in attrition, or dropout, of program clients. The second-level model accounted for an additional 28% of the variance in attrition. A theory of commitment transfer is offered as a first explanation of this result.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.