Pseudogenization of a Sweet-Receptor Gene Accounts for Cats' Indifference toward Sugar

Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
PLoS Genetics (Impact Factor: 7.53). 08/2005; 1(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010003
Source: PubMed


Although domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) possess an otherwise functional sense of taste, they, unlike most mammals, do not prefer and may be unable to detect the sweetness of sugars. One possible explanation for this behavior is that cats lack the sensory system to taste sugars and therefore are indifferent to them. Drawing on work in mice, demonstrating that alleles of sweet-receptor genes predict low sugar intake, we examined the possibility that genes involved in the initial transduction of sweet perception might account for the indifference to sweet-tasting foods by cats. We characterized the sweet-receptor genes of domestic cats as well as those of other members of the Felidae family of obligate carnivores, tiger and cheetah. Because the mammalian sweet-taste receptor is formed by the dimerization of two proteins (T1R2 and T1R3; gene symbols Tas1r2 and Tas1r3), we identified and sequenced both genes in the cat by screening a feline genomic BAC library and by performing PCR with degenerate primers on cat genomic DNA. Gene expression was assessed by RT-PCR of taste tissue, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. The cat Tas1r3 gene shows high sequence similarity with functional Tas1r3 genes of other species. Message from Tas1r3 was detected by RT-PCR of taste tissue. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical studies demonstrate that Tas1r3 is expressed, as expected, in taste buds. However, the cat Tas1r2 gene shows a 247-base pair microdeletion in exon 3 and stop codons in exons 4 and 6. There was no evidence of detectable mRNA from cat Tas1r2 by RT-PCR or in situ hybridization, and no evidence of protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Tas1r2 in tiger and cheetah and in six healthy adult domestic cats all show the similar deletion and stop codons. We conclude that cat Tas1r3 is an apparently functional and expressed receptor but that cat Tas1r2 is an unexpressed pseudogene. A functional sweet-taste receptor heteromer cannot form, and thus the cat lacks the receptor likely necessary for detection of sweet stimuli. This molecular change was very likely an important event in the evolution of the cat's carnivorous behavior.

Download full-text


Available from: Liquan Huang
  • Source
    • "aspects of digestive physiology. For example, cats lack a functional sweet taste receptor for detecting carbohydrate (Li et al. 2005) and, unlike other mammals, the induction of carbohydrases and monosaccharide transporters that occurs with carbohydrate feeding does not occur in cats (Buddington et al. 1991; Kienzle 1993). Consistent with the lack of sweet taste receptors, cats do not exhibit meaningful behavioural responses to sugars in the diet (Bradshaw et al. 1996). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We discuss the relations of processed foods, especially cooked foods, in the human diet to digestive tract form and function. The modern consumption of over 70 % of foods and beverages in highly refined form favours the diet-related classification of humans as cucinivores, rather than omnivores. Archaeological evidence indicates that humans have consumed cooked food for at least 300–400,000 years, and divergence in genes associated with human subpopulations that utilise different foods has been shown to occur over periods of 10–30,000 years. One such divergence is the greater presence of adult lactase persistence in communities that have consumed dairy products, over periods of about 8,000 years, compared to communities not consuming dairy products. We postulate that 300–400,000 years, or 10,000–14,000 generations, is sufficient time for food processing to have influenced the form and function of the human digestive tract. It is difficult to determine how long humans have prepared foods in other ways, such as pounding, grinding, drying or fermenting, but this appears to be for at least 20,000 years, which has been sufficient time to influence gene expression for digestive enzymes. Cooking and food processing expands the range of food that can be eaten, extends food availability into lean times and enhances digestibility. Cooking also detoxifies food to some extent, destroys infective agents, decreases eating time and slightly increases the efficiency of assimilation of energy substrates. On the other hand, cooking can destroy some nutrients and produce toxic products. The human digestive system is suited to a processed food diet because of its smaller volume, notably smaller colonic volume, relative to the intestines of other species, and because of differences from other primates in dentition and facial muscles that result in lower bite strength. There is no known group of humans which does not consume cooked foods, and the modern diet is dominated by processed foods. We conclude that humans are well adapted as consumers of processed, including cooked, foods.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2015 · Journal of Comparative Physiology B
  • Source
    • "Conversely, animals lacking specific molecular machinery do not respond to certain stimuli. This is the case of a specialty feeder, the cat; Felidae have little need to handle carbohydrate, and it is interesting that they have lost functional expression of the carbohydrate-detecting sweet taste receptor (Li et al., 2005). Moreover, the induction of carbohydrases and monosaccharide transporters that occurs with carbohydrate feeding in omnivores does not occur in cats (Buddington et al., 1991; Kienzle, 1993). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The digestive systems of all species have been shaped by environmental pressures over long evolutionary time spans. Nevertheless, all digestive systems must achieve the same end points, the ingestion of biological material and its conversion to molecules that serve as energy substrates and structural components of tissues. A range of strategies to extract nutrients, including for animals reliant primarily on foregut fermentation, hindgut fermentation, and enzymatic degradation, have evolved. Moreover, animals have adapted to different foodstuffs as herbivores (including frugivores, folivores, granivores, etc.), carnivores, and omnivores. We present evidence that humans have diverged from other omnivores because of the long history of consumption of cooked or otherwise prepared food. We consider them to be cucinivores. We present examples to illustrate that the range of foodstuffs that can be efficiently assimilated by each group or species is limited and is different from that of other groups or species. Differences are reflected in alimentary tract morphology. The digestive systems of each group and of species within the groups are adaptable, with constraints determined by individual digestive physiology. Although overall digestive strategies and systems differ, the building blocks for digestion are remarkably similar. All vertebrates have muscular tubular tracts lined with a single layer of epithelial cells for most of the length, use closely related digestive enzymes and transporters, and control the digestive process through similar hormones and similarly organized nerve pathways. Extrapolations among species that are widely separated in their digestive physiologies are possible when the basis for extrapolation is carefully considered. Divergence is greatest at organ or organismal levels, and similarities are greatest at the cell and molecular level.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2015 · Journal of Animal Science
  • Source
    • "However, it has been reported that some species change the number of functional genes according to their taste behavior and feeding ecology. In cats, TAS1R2 gene is pseudogenized due to the 247-bp deletion in exon 3, a stop codon in exon 4, three stop codons in exon6, resulting in loss of their ability to detect sweet taste [122] [123]. Pseudogenization of TAS1R2 is also reported in chicken, and vampire bats [124] [125]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Detection of tastes is critical for animals. Sweet, umami and bitter taste are mediated by G-protein coupled receptors that are expressed in the taste receptor cells. TAS1Rs which belong to class C G-protein coupled receptors form heterodimeric complexes to function as sweet (TAS1R2 + TAS1R3) or umami (TAS1R1 + TAS1R3) taste receptors. Umami taste is also considered to be mediated by mGluRs. TAS2Rs belong to class A G-protein coupled receptors and are responsible for bitter taste. After activation of these receptors, their second messenger pathways leads to depolarization and intracellular calcium increase in taste receptor cells. Then, transmitter is released from taste receptor cells leading to activation of taste nerve fibers and taste information are sent to the central nervous system. Recent studies on heterologous expression system and molecular modeling leads to better understanding of binding site of TAS1Rs and TAS2Rs and molecular mechanisms for interaction between taste substances and these receptors. TAS1Rs and TAS2Rs have multiple and single binding sites for structurally diverse ligands, respectively. Sensitivities of these receptors are known to differ among individuals, strains, and species. In addition, some species abolish these receptors and signaling molecules. Here we focus on structure, function, signaling, polymorphism, and molecular evolution of the taste G-protein coupled receptors.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Journal of Applied Statistics
Show more