The Impact of Overtime and Long Work Hours on Occupational Injuries and Illnesses: New Evidence from the United States

Center for Health Policy & Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA.
Occupational and environmental medicine (Impact Factor: 3.27). 10/2005; 62(9):588-97. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.016667
Source: PubMed


To analyse the impact of overtime and extended working hours on the risk of occupational injuries and illnesses among a nationally representative sample of working adults from the United States.
Responses from 10,793 Americans participating in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) were used to evaluate workers' job histories, work schedules, and occurrence of occupational injury and illness between 1987 and 2000. A total of 110,236 job records were analysed, encompassing 89,729 person-years of accumulated working time. Aggregated incidence rates in each of five exposure categories were calculated for each NLSY survey period. Multivariate analytical techniques were used to estimate the relative risk of long working hours per day, extended hours per week, long commute times, and overtime schedules on reporting a work related injury or illness, after adjusting for age, gender, occupation, industry, and region.
After adjusting for those factors, working in jobs with overtime schedules was associated with a 61% higher injury hazard rate compared to jobs without overtime. Working at least 12 hours per day was associated with a 37% increased hazard rate and working at least 60 hours per week was associated with a 23% increased hazard rate. A strong dose-response effect was observed, with the injury rate (per 100 accumulated worker-years in a particular schedule) increasing in correspondence to the number of hours per day (or per week) in the workers' customary schedule.
Results suggest that job schedules with long working hours are not more risky merely because they are concentrated in inherently hazardous industries or occupations, or because people working long hours spend more total time "at risk" for a work injury. Strategies to prevent work injuries should consider changes in scheduling practices, job redesign, and health protection programmes for people working in jobs involving overtime and extended hours.

  • Source
    • "Twelve-h work shift with several short break times is safer than a 8-h shift work with a short break time[4]. The prolonged work hours have been linked with the increase fatigue and unhealthy life behaviors, decrease in performance and reaction time, thereby, increase likelihood of injuries and accident rates[23,26]. Furthermore, perceived fatigue depend on shift length, period of the workdays, number of work shifts before a rest day, number of rest days before the shift, quality and quantity of rest time between shifts[27]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Shift work is a common work schedule that has several inappropriate consequences, the most important of which is fatigue. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the shift length on the occupational fatigue of operators in filling stations. This cross-sectional study was carried out on operators of the filling station in National Iranian Oil Products Distribution Company, Hamadan region, western Iran. Participants were chosen using the random sampling. In order to assess occupational fatigue, the Persian version of Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (P-SOFI) was used in 8, 12 and 24-hour shift schedules. The total score of fatigue (P=0.05), functional fatigue (P=0.001) and conceptual fatigue (P=0.013) had significant difference in various shifts length, but physical dimension score had not significant differences. Among all aforementioned shift works, the 24-h shift had higher fatigue score in P-SOFI. It seems that shift length has a significant impact on occupational fatigue among filling station workers. The result of the study can help to work scheduling and rest-work regime planning for health promotion of workers and accident risk reduction.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2015
    • "This high accident rate has a wide range of causes and stems from multiple variables. For example, there are various stressors at the vehicle maintenance worksite, which include the following: (i) a noisy environment (Bejan et al., 2011; Dembe et al., 2005; Sorock et al., 2004); (ii) asbestos (Dotson, 2006; Cohen and Van Orden, 2008; Blake et al., 2008); and (iii) ergonomic conditions (Fredriksson et al., 2001; Vandergrift et al., 2011). Although vehicle mechanics are exposed to a wide range of occupational risks, previous research has only focused on one risk type, and has not provided a comprehensive overview of the issue. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this research, vehicle maintenance activities and their safety risks were statistically analyzed. This study focused on three types of vehicle: hybrid, battery electric, and hydrogen fuel cell cars. The repair activities and the risks for each power train technology were identified by a panel of experts. Depending on its frequency and severity, risk values were calculated for each maintenance activity. The method chosen was the staticized group method, which involves collection opinions from a panel of experts. The ten experts finally chosen were asked to anonymously respond to a survey that had been especially designed to reduce bias and ensure the quality of the data. The most dangerous vehicle maintenance activities were the manipulation of asbestos, charging and discharging of high value capacitors, and welding.
    No preview · Article · May 2015 · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
  • Source
    • "During the day, SAHS causes somnolence, fatigue, loss of coordination, and decreased reaction time. Poor sleep quality is responsible for traffic accidents in truck driving [10]– [14] and for work accidents [15]–[17]. Workers who suffer from any sleep problem have reduced productivity and more work absenteeism, and they use more health care resources [18], [19]. Consecutive days of inefficient sleep increase fatigue and the risk of accidents. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The mining industry is constantly looking to improve the safety of mine operators and their productivity. The sleep quality of mine workers is an important issue related to both goals. Miners are usually exposed to hard working shifts in a hostile environment, which can lead to deficient rest between shifts. Inadequate sleep is related to fatigue and higher risk of accidents. Sleep quality is traditionally evaluated by specialized medical personnel through polysomnography by measuring apneas, body movements (BMs), and the time in bed (TB), among other parameters, trying to determine the sleep depth. We present a noninvasive sleep evaluation device based on pressure sensors on the bed that can be used to measure relevant parameters to estimate sleep quality. This device can be easily unobtrusively installed at mining facilities and provide the TB, the respiration frequency, BMs, apnea events, and the sleep depth. We present preliminary results that validate the device for future studies at mining sites and as a new hazard control mechanism.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015 · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Show more