Content uploaded by Kyung Young Yoon
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kyung Young Yoon on Feb 27, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
Production of probiotic cabbage juice by lactic acid bacteria
Kyung Young Yoon, Edward E. Woodams, Yong D. Hang
*
Department of Food Science and Technology, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456, United States
Received 29 March 2004; received in revised form 14 June 2005; accepted 30 June 2005
Available online 24 August 2005
Abstract
Research was undertaken to determine the suitability of cabbage as a raw material for production of probiotic cabbage juice by
lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus plantarum C3,Lactobacillus casei A4, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii D7). Cabbage juice was inoc-
ulated with a 24-h-old lactic culture and incubated at 30 C. Changes in pH, acidity, sugar content, and viable cell counts during
fermentation under controlled conditions were monitored. L. casei,L. delbrueckii, and L. plantarum grew well on cabbage juice
and reached nearly 10 ·10
8
CFU/mL after 48 h of fermentation at 30 C. L. casei, however, produced a smaller amount of titratable
acidity expressed as lactic acid than L. delbrueckii or L. plantarum. After 4 weeks of cold storage at 4 C, the viable cell counts of L.
plantarum and L. delbrueckii were still 4.1 ·10
7
and 4.5 ·10
5
mL
1
, respectively. L. casei did not survive the low pH and high acid-
ity conditions in fermented cabbage juice and lost cell viability completely after 2 weeks of cold storage at 4 C. Fermented cabbage
juice could serve as a healthy beverage for vegetarians and lactose-allergic consumers.
2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Cabbage juice; Probiotic; Lactic acid bacteria; Lactobacillus casei;Lactobacillus delbrueckii;Lactobacillus plantarum
1. Introduction
Probiotics are defined as live microbial feed supple-
ment that beneficially affects the host by improving its
intestinal balance (Fuller, 1989). Most probiotic microor-
ganisms are lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus
plantarum,Lactobacillus casei,Lactobacillus acidophilus,
and Streptococcus lactis (Sindhu and Khetarpaul, 2001).
Research has shown that addition of probiotics to food
provides several health benefits including reduction in
the level of serum cholesterol, improved gastrointestinal
function, enhanced immune system, and lower risk of co-
lon cancer (Berner and OÕDonnell, 1998; Rafter, 2003;
Saarela et al., 2002; McNaught and MacFie, 2001). Lac-
tic acid bacteria are commercially used as starter cultures
for the manufacture of dairy-based probiotic foods
(Heenan et al., 2002). Traditionally, probiotics have been
added to yogurt and other fermented dairy products, but
lactose intolerance and the cholesterol content are two
drawbacks related to their consumption. In recent years,
consumer demand for non-dairy-based probiotic prod-
ucts has increased, and probiotics have been incorpo-
rated into drinks as well as marketed as supplements in
the form of tablets, capsules, and freeze–dried prepara-
tions (Shah, 2001). Fruits and vegetables are rich in func-
tional food components such as minerals, vitamins,
dietary fibers, and antioxidants (phytochemicals). Fur-
thermore, fruits and vegetables do not contain any dairy
allergens that might prevent usage by certain segments of
the population (Luckow and Delahunty, 2004).
Cabbage is a cruciferous vegetable, which is rich in
minerals, vitamin C, dietary fibers, and especially phyto-
chemicals (Chu et al., 2002). The objective of this study
was to determine the suitability of cabbage as a raw
material for production of probiotic cabbage juice by
probiotic lactic acid bacteria.
0960-8524/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.06.018
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 315 787 2265; fax: +1 325 787
2284.
E-mail address: ydh1@cornell.edu (Y.D. Hang).
Bioresource Technology 97 (2006) 1427–1430
2. Methods
Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.) was
purchased from a local store and kept at 4 C prior to
use. Cabbage juice was obtained with a Loomis press
operated at 2000 psi and sterilized for 15 min at 121 C.
2.1. Probiotic lactic acid cultures
Lactobacillus casei A4,Lactobacillus debrueckii D7,
and Lactobacillus plantarum C3 were obtained from
the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station
Culture Collection, Geneva, New York. The cultures
were grown at 30 C for 24 h in MRS broth (dextrose
20.0 g/L; meat peptone 10.0 g/L; beef extract 10.0 g/L;
yeast extract 5.0 g/L; sodium acetate 5.0 g/L; disodium
phosphate 2.0 g/L; ammonium citrate 2.0 g/L; tween
80 1.0 g/L; magnesium sulfate 0.1 g/L, manganese sul-
fate 0.05 g/L).
2.2. Fermentation of probiotic cabbage juice
Fermentation experiments were conducted in test
tubes (25 ·200 mm), each containing 40 mL of sterile
cabbage juice. All samples were inoculated with a 24-h
culture (>10
5
CFU/mL) and incubated at 30 C for
72 h. Samples were taken at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h for chem-
ical and microbiological analyses.
2.3. Effect of cold storage on cell viability in probiotic
cabbage juice
After 72 h of fermentation at 30 C, the fermented
samples were stored at 4 C for 4 weeks. Samples were
taken at weekly intervals, and the viability of probiotic
cultures in probiotic cabbage juice was determined and
expressed as colony forming units (CFU/mL).
2.4. Chemical and microbiological analyses
The pH of probiotic cabbage juice was measured
with a pH meter. Total acidity, expressed as percent lac-
tic acid, was determined by titrating with 0.02 N NaOH
to pH 8.2. Sugar content was analyzed as glucose by the
phenol sulfuric acid method of Dubios et al. (1956). Via-
ble cell counts (CFU/mL) were determined by the stan-
dard plate method with Lactobacilli MRS medium after
48 h of incubation at 30 C.
2.5. Statistical analysis
All experiments were carried out in triplicate, and
each sample was analyzed in duplicate. The results are
expressed as mean ± S.D. (standard deviation). The
SAS statistical computer package was used to analyze
the experimental data (SAS Institute, Cary, NC,
USA). The values within rows that have no common
superscript are significantly different (p< 0.05) accord-
ing to DuncanÕs multiple range test (SAS Institute, Cary,
NC, USA). Any two means not marked by the same
superscript (for example, a and b or b and c within rows)
are significantly different (p< 0.05). Any two means
marked by the same superscript (for example, a and a
or b and b within rows) are not significantly different
(p< 0.05).
3. Results and discussion
All the three species of lactic acid bacteria, L. casei,
L. delbrueckii, and L. plantarum, were found capable
of growing well on sterilized cabbage juice without
nutrient supplementation. The time courses of lactic
acid fermentation of cabbage juice by L. casei,L. plan-
tarum,andL. delbrueckii are presented in Tables 1–3,
respectively. L. casei,L. plantarum and L. delbrueckii
grew rapidly on cabbage juice and reached nearly
10 ·10
8
CFU/mL after 48 h of fermentation at 30 C.
Extending the fermentation beyond 48 h did not result
in a significant increase in the viable cell counts of lactic
acid bacteria. Both L. plantarum and L. delbrueckii pro-
duced significantly more titratable acidity expressed as
lactic acid than L. casei. For example, L. plantarum
and L. delbrueckii produced nearly 1% titratable acidity
expressed as lactic acid after 72 h of fermentation
at 30 C. Under similar growth conditions, L. casei
Table 1
Time course of lactic fermentation of cabbage juice by Lactobacillus
casei
Time
(h)
pH Acidity
(% lactic acid)
Sugar
(mg/mL)
CFU/mL
0 5.0 ± 0.1
a
0.11 ± 0.01
d
45.6 ± 2.5
a
3.0 ± 0.2 ·10
6a
24 3.7 ± 0.0
b
0.38 ± 0.01
c
41.7 ± 1.4
b
6.3 ± 0.0 ·10
8b
48 3.4 ± 0.0
c
0.6 ± 0.03
b
39.5 ± 1.8
bc
12 ± 0.0 ·10
8c
72 3.4 ± 0.1
c
0.74 ± 0.02
a
36.5 ± 1.9
c
11 ± 0.1 ·10
8c
Means and standard deviations for n= 3. The experimental values
within rows that have no common superscript are significantly different
(p< 0.05) according to DuncanÕs multiple test range.
Table 2
Time course of lactic fermentation of cabbage juice by Lactobacillus
plantarum
Time
(h)
pH Acidity
(% lactic acid)
Sugar
(mg/mL)
CFU/mL
0 5.8 ± 0.0
a
0.12 ± 0.0
a
35.08 ± 0.09
a
8.0 ± 6.26 ·10
5a
24 4.8 ± 0.2
b
0.23 ± 0.06
b
37.10 ± 0.39
a
7.7 ± 3.41 ·10
8b
48 3.6 ± 0.0
c
0.76 ± 0.03
c
36.44 ± 3.77
a
15.3 ± 0.92 ·10
8c
72 3.6 ± 0.0
c
0.97 ± 0.03
d
19.33 ± 1.04
b
17.5 ± 7.05 ·10
8c
Means and standard deviations for n= 3. The experimental values
within rows that have no common superscript are significantly different
(p< 0.05) according to DuncanÕs multiple test range.
1428 K.Y. Yoon et al. / Bioresource Technology 97 (2006) 1427–1430
produced only 0.74% titratable acidity expressed as lac-
tic acid. It is probable that L. casei requires some essen-
tial growth nutrients which are deficient in cabbage juice
(Pederson and Albury, 1969). Earlier studies have
reported that an antibacterial substance is present in
cabbage (Pederson and Fisher, 1944; Dickerman
and Liberman, 1952; Kyung and Fleming, 1994a). The
growth inhibitory substance of fresh cabbage was sug-
gested to be carbohydrate in nature and of a low molec-
ular weight (Dickerman and Liberman, 1952). Kyung
and Fleming (1994b) reported that fresh juice of Cecile
cultivar cabbage was inhibitory to the growth of lactic
acid bacteria, and the inhibition was eliminated when
the cabbage was heated (steamed 10 min) before juice
extraction.
The data in Table 4 illustrate the effect of cold storage
on the viability of three species of lactic acid bacteria in
fermented cabbage juice. L. plantarum and L. delbrueckii
were capable of surviving in the fermented cabbage juice
at 4 C for several weeks. For example, the viable cell
counts of L. plantarum and L. delbrueckii were still
4.1 ·10
7
and 4.5 ·10
5
mL
1
, respectively, after 4 weeks
of storage at 4 C. However, L. casei was unable to sur-
vive the low pH and high acidity conditions in fer-
mented cabbage juice at 4 C and lost the cell viability
completely after only 2 weeks of cold storage. For the
maximum health benefits, the minimum number of pro-
biotic organisms in a food product should be 10
6
CFU/g
(Shah, 2001). Therefore, the viability of the lactic cul-
tures is the most important factor during refrigerated
or frozen storage. The viability of probiotic organisms
is dependent on the level of oxygen in products, oxygen
permeation of the package, fermentation time, and stor-
age temperature (Shah, 2000). The viability of probiotic
bacteria is also affected by inhibitory substances such
as lactic acid produced during production and cold
storage. Other factors for loss of viability of probiotic
organisms have been attributed to the decrease in pH
of the medium and accumulation of organic acid as a
result of growth and fermentation (Hood and Zottola,
1988; Shah and Jelen, 1990). In this study, we found
both L. plantarum and L. delbrueckii could survive the
high acidity and low pH in the fermented cabbage juice.
4. Conclusion
Three lactic acid bacteria, L. casei,L. plantarum,and
L. delbrueckii were examined for their ability to utilize
cabbage juice for cell synthesis and lactic acid production
without nutrient supplement. These lactic cultures grew
well in cabbage juice at 30 C, and the viable cell counts
reached nearly 10 ·10
8
CFU/mL after 48 h of fermenta-
tion at 30 C. Both L. plantarum and L. delbrueckii were
capable of surviving the low pH and high acidic condi-
tions in fermented cabbage juice during cold storage at
4C. In contrast, L. casei could not survive the low pH
and high acidity in fermented cabbage juice, and lost cell
viability completely after only 2 weeks of cold storage at
4C. From the results of this study, it is concluded that
L. plantarum and L. delbrueckii could be used as probi-
otic cultures for production of a healthy beverage from
cabbage for vegetarians or consumers who are allergic
to lactose present in probiotic dairy products.
Acknowledgements
Dr. Kyung Young Yoon received a post-doctoral fel-
lowship from Korea Science and Engineering Founda-
tion (KOSEF). This work was supported in part by
USDA Regional Project NE-1008.
References
Berner, L., OÕDonnell, J., 1998. Functional foods and health claims
legislation: applications to dairy foods. International Dairy Journal
8, 355–362.
Chu, Y.-F., Sun, J., Wu, X., Liu, R.H., 2002. Antioxidants and
antiproliferative activities of vegetables. Journal of Agricultural
and Food Chemistry 50, 6910–6916.
Dickerman, J.M., Liberman, S., 1952. Studies on the chemical nature
of an antibiotic present in water extract of cabbage. Food Research
17, 438–441.
Table 4
Effect of cold storage on the viability of lactic cultures in fermented
cabbage juice
Time
(weeks)
CFU/mL
Lactobacillus
casei
Lactobacillus
plantarum
Lactobacillus
delbrueckii
0 1.1 ± 0.01 ·10
9a
17.5 ± 7.05 ·10
8a
11.0 ± 1.50 ·10
8a
1 1.1 ± 5.3 ·10
6b
13.0 ± 3.10 ·10
8a
9.9 ± 1.72 ·10
8a
2 ND 10.4 ± 2.32 ·10
7b
15.9 ± 2.56 ·10
7b
3 ND 6.7 ± 0.61 ·10
7b
34.3 ± 8.52 ·10
5b
4 ND 4.1 ± 0.16 ·10
7b
4.5 ± 3.32 ·10
5b
ND: not detected.
Means and standard deviations for n= 3. The experimental values
within rows that have no common superscript are significantly different
(p< 0.05) according to DuncanÕs multiple test range.
Table 3
Time course of lactic fermentation of cabbage juice by Lactobacillus
delbrueckii
Time
(h)
pH Acidity
(% lactic acid)
Sugar
(mg/mL)
CFU/mL
0 5.8 ± 0.0
a
0.12 ± 0.0
a
35.08 ± 0.09
a
4.3 ± 1.76 ·10
5a
24 4.5 ± 0.2
b
0.30 ± 0.04
b
36.32 ± 3.30
a
7.6 ± 2.35 ·10
8b
48 3.7 ± 0.0
c
0.74 ± 0.03
c
29.62 ± 2.17
b
15.4 ± 4.28 ·10
8c
72 3.6 ± 0.0
c
0.95 ± 0.01
d
28.45 ± 0.84
b
11.0 ± 1.50 ·10
8ab
Means and standard deviations for n= 3. The experimental values
within rows that have no common superscript are significantly different
(p< 0.05) according to DuncanÕs multiple test range.
K.Y. Yoon et al. / Bioresource Technology 97 (2006) 1427–1430 1429
Dubios, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Roberts, D.A., Smith, F.,
1956. Colorimetric methods for determination of sugars and
related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28, 350–356.
Fuller, R., 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied
Bacteriology 66, 365–378.
Heenan, C.N., Adams, M.C., Hosken, R.W., Fleet, G.H., 2002.
Growth medium for culturing probiotic bacteria for applications in
vegetarian food products. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Tech-
nologie 35, 171–176.
Hood, S.K., Zottola, M.L., 1988. Effect of low pH on the ability of
Lactobacillus acidophilus to survive and adhere to human intestinal
cell. Journal of Food Science 53, 1514–1516.
Kyung, K.H., Fleming, H.P., 1994a. Antibacterial activity of cabbage
juice against lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Food Science 59, 125–
129.
Kyung, K.H., Fleming, H.P., 1994b. S-methyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide as
the precursor of methanethiolsulfinate, the principal antibacterial
compound in cabbage. Journal of Food Science 59, 350–355.
Luckow, T., Delahunty, C., 2004. Which juice is healthier? A consumer
study of probiotic non-dairy juice drinks. Food Quality and
Preference. Available from: <www.sciencedirect.com>.
McNaught, C.E., MacFie, J., 2001. Probiotics in clinical practice: a
critical review of the evidence. Nutrition Research 21, 343–353.
Pederson, C.S., Albury, M.N., 1969. The sauerkraut fermentation. In:
N.Y. State Agricultural Exp. Sta. Bull., vol. 824, Geneva, NY.
Pederson, C.S., Fisher, P., 1944. The bactericidal action of cabbage
and other vegetable juices. In: N.Y. State Agricultural Exp. Sta.
Bull., vol. 273, Geneva, NY.
Rafter, J., 2003. Probiotics and colon cancer. Best Practice and
Research Clinical Gastroentrology 17 (5), 849–859.
Saarela, M., La
¨hteena
¨ki, L., Crittenden, R., Salminen, S., Mattila-
Sandholm, T., 2002. Gut bacteria and health foods—the European
perspective. International Journal of Food Microbiology 78, 99–
117.
Shah, N.P., 2000. Symposium: probiotic bacteria. Probiotic bacteria:
selective enumeration and survival in dairy foods. Journal of Dairy
Science 83, 894–907.
Shah, N.P., 2001. Functional foods from probiotics and prebiotics.
Food Technology 55 (11), 46–53.
Shah, N.P., Jelen, P., 1990. Survival of lactic acid bacteria and their
lactases under acidic conditions. Journal of Food Science 55, 506–
509.
Sindhu, S.C., Khetarpaul, N., 2001. Probiotic fermentation of indig-
enous food mixture: effect on antinutrients and digestibility of
starch and protein. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 14,
601–609.
1430 K.Y. Yoon et al. / Bioresource Technology 97 (2006) 1427–1430