Article

Math Learning Disorder: Incidence in a Population-Based Birth Cohort, 1976–82, Rochester, Minn

Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Ambulatory Pediatrics (Impact Factor: 2.49). 09/2005; 5(5):281-9. DOI: 10.1367/A04-209R.1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

To report the incidence of math learning disorder (Math LD) among school-aged children, overall and by gender. To compare incidence estimates obtained by using three different methods to identify Math LD cases. To assess the extent to which children manifest Math LD alone, versus Math LD with comorbid reading disorder.
This is a population-based, retrospective, birth cohort study. Subjects included all children born 1976-82 who remained in Rochester, Minn after age 5 (N = 5718). Using records from all public and private schools, medical facilities, and private tutorial services, all individually administered intelligence quotient and achievement tests and extensive medical, educational, and socioeconomic information were abstracted. Math LD was established using research criteria based on 3 formulas (regression-based discrepancy, nonregression-based discrepancy, low achievement).
Cumulative incidence rates of Math LD by age 19 years varied from 5.9% to 13.8% according to the formula used. Boys were more likely to be affected than girls, with relative risk ratios from 1.6 to 2.2 depending on the formula applied. Many children with Math LD (35% to 56.7%, depending on the formula used to define Math LD) did not have a comorbid reading disorder.
These results, from a community-based birth cohort, suggest that Math LD is common among schoolchildren, and is significantly more frequent among boys than girls, regardless of definition. Many children with Math LD do not have an associated reading disorder.

Full-text preview

Available from: mdecgateway.org
    • "De plus, la dyscalculie est très fréquemment associée a ` la dyslexie, par ex., de 17 % (Gross-Tsur et al., 1996) a ` 43,3 voire 65 % (Barbaresi et al., 2005) des enfants dyscalculiques, selon les critères diagnostiques utilisés), et au trouble de déficit de l'attention/hyperactivité (26 % des enfants dyscalculiques; Gross- Tsur et al., 1996). Selon Barbaresi et al. (2005), la dyscalculie affecte plus souvent les garçons que les filles (2 garçons pour 1 fille); d'autres études (Lewis et al., 1994; Gross-Tsur et al., 1996; Badian, 1999) suggèrent plutôt que la dyscalculie est équitablement répartie entre les sexes. Les troubles dyscalculiques persistent jusqu'a ` l'âge adulte. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La dyscalculie est définie comme un trouble du développement mathématique qui nuit aux activités scolaires et quotidiennes. Les difficultés qui en découlent sont diverses, notamment pour les activités de comptage, de dénombrement, de calcul et de la résolution de problèmes. Différentes hypothèses cognitives ont été proposées pour expliquer les processus touchés et l’origine fonctionnelle de la dyscalculie. L’hypothèse du déficit du sens du nombre suggère que la dyscalculie résulte d’un déficit du traitement des représentations non symboliques du nombre et d’une altération des représentations numériques mentales, impliquant, entre autres choses, des difficultés a` comparer, a` reconnaître et a` estimer des quantités, et des difficultés a` placer des nombres sur une ligne numérique. Cependant, l’hypothèse du déficit d’accès au sens du nombre suggère que la dyscalculie est caractérisée par la présence de difficultés a` accéder au sens des quantités a` partir des nombres arabes: les enfants dyscalculiques ont des performances équivalentes a` leurs pairs de groupes contrôles pour traiter des nombres non symboliques, mais des difficultés de traitement des nombres arabes. Dans cette revue de la littérature, nous présentons brièvement des travaux qui concernent ces deux hypothèses explicatives, pour ensuite en faire une critique.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2015 · Canadian Psychologist Psychologie Canadienne
    • "In the Swanson et al. (2009) meta-analyses, nonverbal problem solving moderated effect size differences between MD and RD. Because the identification of learning disability varies according to the definition used (Barbaresi et al., 2005), it is essential to be explicit in this regard. In the literature, low achievement criteria are most common, though the cut point (e.g., 10th, 25th, 35th percentile) and type of measure used (e.g., math facts, computations, problem solving) vary; some also require low performance over time (Geary, Hoard, Byrd-Craven, Nugent, & Numtee, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to compare subgroups of students with various forms of learning difficulties (< 25th percentile) on cognitive and mathematics characteristics. Students with mathematics difficulty (MD, n = 105), reading difficulty (RD, n = 65), both (MDRD, n = 87), or neither (NoLD, n = 403) were evaluated on an array of cognitive measures (e.g., working memory and language) and on mathematics measures of foundational numerical competencies, computation, and problem solving. Results revealed expected level differences among groups in both domains: NoLD outperformed RD, and MD outperformed MDRD. Profile differences were noted among pairs of subgroups on cognitive measures. On mathematics measures, profile differences were noted between RD and other subgroups, but not between MD and MDRD subgroups. The most discriminating cognitive measures were processing speed and language; the most discriminating mathematics measures depended on the subgroups being compared. Results were further evaluated according to more severe (< 10th percentile) criteria for MD and RD, which generally affected level differences more than the profile patterns. Results have implications for understanding comorbid MD and RD and for conceptualizing core deficits in MD.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2015 · Journal of Learning Disabilities
  • Source
    • "First, some prevalence studies defined DD using an IQ-achievement discrepancy (e.g., Barahmand, 2008; Barbaresi, Katusic, Colligan, Weaver, & Jacobsen, 2005; Lewis, Hitch, & Walker, 1994; Mazzocco & Myers, 2003), that is, mathematics performance that is substantially below what would be expected given general intelligence. Similarly, Barbaresi et al. (2005) estimated the prevalence of DD using a regression-based discrepancy definition, in which maths performance scores were predicted by a sum of a constant (i.e. a 'discrepancy' value) and weighted sum of the IQ score (Barbaresi et al., 2005). Second, others defined DD by the severity of the mathematics impairment using performance cutoffs on standardized tests; the range of cutoffs used in the prevalence studies are represented in Fig. 1. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Developmental dyscalculia (DD) is a learning difficulty specific to mathematics learning. The prevalence of DD may be equivalent to that of dyslexia, posing an important challenge for effective educational provision. Nevertheless, there is no agreed definition of DD and there are controversies surrounding cutoff decisions, specificity and gender differences. In the current study, 1004 British primary school children completed mathematics and reading assessments. The prevalence of DD and gender ratio were estimated in this sample using different criteria. When using absolute thresholds, the prevalence of DD was the same for both genders regardless of the cutoff criteria applied, however gender differences emerged when using a mathematics-reading discrepancy definition. Correlations between mathematics performance and the control measures selected to identify a specific learning difficulty affect both prevalence estimates and whether a gender difference is in fact identified. Educational implications are discussed.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2013 · Learning and Instruction
Show more