ArticlePDF Available

Dialysis patient empowerment: what, why, and how

Authors:
  • Medical Education Institute, Inc.

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
Dialysis Patient Empowerment: What, Why, and How
Dori Schatell, MS; Beth Witten, MSW, ACSW, LSCSW
The goal should be 100% of patients doing 50% of their own care and 50% of patients
doing 100% of their care. – Chris Blagg, MD
Empowered Patients are Expert Patients
From the perspective of the Life Options program (www.lifeoptions.org), an
“empowered” patient is an expert patient—one equipped through knowledge and attitude
to take an active role in self-managing his or her kidney disease. You can recognize
empowered, expert patients because they know themselves and their bodies very well.
They may track their blood tests in a notebook, tell the technician how much fluid they
want to remove, and put in their own needles. They may be the mentors you call on to
help orient frightened, new patients.
Patients need to become experts, because even if they dialyze in-center, they are only
supervised by professionals in the clinic for about 14 hours a week—just 8% of their total
time. (See Figure 1). The other 92% of the time, they are on their own, and they are self-
managing—for better or worse—with each bite of food, each drink, each medication,
each treatment, and each symptom. Self-management includes a trio of tasks: following
the treatment plan, maintaining safety (e.g., by access monitoring, or by noticing and
preventing errors), and reporting their symptoms so the care team can assess whether
intervention is needed. The reality is, care provided by the clinic is only half of the
outcomes equation. Patient involvement and follow-through is the other half.
Time at
dialysis
8%
Time on
own
92%
Figure 1: Self-management Time
Patient Benefits of Empowerment
When patients find out their kidneys are failing, they lose their sense of control over their
lives. Learning self-management and becoming an expert can help patients regain their
sense of control, or self-efficacy—confidence in one’s ability to master a task. Research
with long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) survivors
i
and hemodialysis (HD) survivors
ii
found that having a sense of control was key to successful adaptation to kidney failure.
In fact, one of four “affirmations” made by HD patients who had survived for 15 years or
more was “I am in control.”
iii
. A recent series of studies from Taiwan found that self-
efficacy explained an astounding 47.5% of the variance in 160 dialysis patients’ quality
of life
iv
, that patients randomized to structured self-efficacy training had significantly
lower intradialytic weight gains than controls
v
, and that patients randomized to an
empowerment group had significantly greater self-care self-efficacy and less depression
than controls
vi
.
Beyond control and self-efficacy, Life Options research has found that patients who were
more knowledgeable about their care scored higher on the mental component summary
(MCS) of the MOS SF-12, and patients who actively took part in certain aspects of self-
management had higher physical component summary (PCS) scores.
vii
Higher MCS and
PCS scores, in turn, predict fewer hospitalizations and lower mortality rates.
viii
Empowered, expert patients who are working-age may also be able to stay in better
health and maintain a job—which confers self-esteem, higher income than disability will
pay, and often health insurance.
Clinic Benefits of Patient Empowerment
For clinics, patients who keep their jobs can provide significant extra revenue—and
empowered working-age patients may be more likely to seek out a clinic that offers a
work-friendly schedule or home modality. Not surprisingly, patients who chose PD or
transplant (USRDS numbers for home HD were too small to analyze) were significantly
more likely to have kept their jobs between six months prior and initiation of renal
replacement therapy than patients on in-center HD.
ix
Among new patients who were
working full time, Life Options research found that 72% had coverage through an
employer group health plan (EGHP).
9
On average, EGHPs pay about $350 per dialysis
session—more than three times the Medicare rate—plus higher reimbursement for
separately billable drugs and supplies.
x
Across the industry, while just 25% of patients
have EGHP primary coverage in any given year, this insurance provides 50% of dialysis
clinic revenues.
10
Clinics benefit when empowered patients of any age keep themselves healthier and avoid
hospital stays. In addition, empowered patients are more rewarding to work with.
Programming to enhance patient knowledge, physical and vocational functioning, and
emotional well-being in dialysis—all factors involved in empowerment—has been linked
to reduced staff turnover and improved patient outcomes.
xi
Barriers to Patient Empowerment
Why aren’t more patients empowered today? We believe there are several key reasons:
The dialysis industry provides care using an acute disease model, where professionals
are the knowledgeable experts and the job of patients is to comply. But this model
doesn’t fit chronic disease, where the goal of treatment is not a cure, but adjustment
and day-to-day symptom management, and long-term survival requires that patients
self-manage independently, consulting with their care teams as equals. Changing
over to an empowering chronic disease model will require a sea change in staff
attitudes and behavior. In the meantime, power struggles that can occur when expert
patients disagree with staff, are stressful to both, and may even contribute to patient
mortality.
1
Patients who are new to dialysis rarely know much about it, and the learning curve is
steep. Ignorance about kidney disease and its treatment may be systematically
mistaken for an inability to learn. This perception is compounded by a lack of
annual, national data collection on patient education level—though nearly every other
conceivable demographic characteristic is measured and reported. Problems with
health literacy are by no means limited to dialysis. Individuals who are more likely to
lack health literacy include immigrants, minorities, and those over age 60.
xii
But
health literacy can be improved.
New patients may also be terrified, angry, depressed, and overwhelmed. Their fear
and denial may lead staff to believe that they don’t want to learn and/or don’t want a
role in their care. Since 92% of patients begin dialysis on in-center HD
xiii
, patients
also become passive and dependent and expect to be cared for, and obtain the
impression that only a professional can administer a dialysis treatment.
Some physicians or staff refuse to allow patients to engage in in-center self-
management activities such as determining their fluid goals, setting up their
machines, or even learning to do self-cannulation, a skill that could reduce costs and
extend the lifespan of grafts or fistulas. Excuses are many and varied, but often the
fear of liability is among them. We could not find a single case where a patient who
was trained to do self-care or home dialysis sued a clinic. In fact, most lawsuits in
dialysis occur when patients are dependent on staff and an error is made. Given this
fact, why are clinics afraid to teach patients the same skills they teach technicians,
most of whom had no prior medical training either?
Self-care or home dialysis—which are intrinsically empowering because patients are
trained to do these treatments themselves—are not widely enough available, and
patients often don’t even know they exist. In a large national study, only about 25%
of patients reported having been told about PD or home HD
xiv
, and only 9% of
patients currently do any type of home dialysis.
13
How to Empower Your Patients
In an ideal world, every clinic would be able to offer its patients predialysis education
classes, which have been found to slow progression to end-stage,
xv
and structured classes
in empowerment, which can apparently be quite effective
5,6
. But unfortunately, resources
are stretched to the limit in U.S. dialysis clinics, and this is simply not feasible under
current Medicare reimbursement and with a variety of staffing shortages.* Still, there is
much we can do.
Simply realizing how vitally important control, self-efficacy, and empowerment are to
patients is a first step. No-one accidentally—or passively—survives for decades on
dialysis. In a chronic disease model, the job of dialysis professionals is not merely to
provide care: it is to prepare patients to manage their own care during all of those hours
when they are on their own. This role is much more empowering for staff as well as
patients. To paraphrase the proverb, instead of giving patients a fish, we can and should
teach them to fish—and they will do better for a lifetime. All members of the team can
look for and take advantage of “teachable moments.” Encourage questions; be askable.
Asking knowledgeable patients to mentor new patients can help reduce fear and set a
good example.
A second step is to demystify the process of dialysis and create an expectation that
patients will be as involved in their own care as possible, starting when they are
diagnosed with chronic kidney disease. In a recent large study, Stack & Martin (2005)
found that patients who reported an active role in choosing their treatment modality had a
39% lower risk of death and were also significantly more likely to get a transplant than
patients who did not.
xvi
Longstanding patients sometimes misinterpret efforts to get them
more involved, believing that staff are trying to shirk their duties. But new patients don’t
know what to expect, so it may be easier to indoctrinate them into an active self-
management role that will help to empower them, particularly when the focus is on
what’s in it for them. Using a series of ascending self-care steps (See Figure 2) may help
clinics to define CQI goals and document their efforts to empower patients.
8b. Insert hemodialysis needles with assistance.
8a. Set up and take down dialysis machine.
6b. Know where access shouldn’t be cannulated.
6a. Know the rotational pattern for cannulating their access.
5d. Know dry weight and how much fluid should be removed.
5c. Know steps to alleviate common, non-life-threatening symptoms (i.e., hypotension, cramping).
5b. Know when fluid replacement is needed.
5a. Know what the machine alarms mean.
4e. Explain basic principles of dialysis and how the machine works.
4d. Take and record BP.
4c. Know what symptoms to report during and off dialysis.
4b. Report symptoms during and off dialysis (i.e., edema, shortness of breath, chest pain, dizziness, fever).
4a. Verify dialyzer & ask if it has been appropriately reprocessed, primed, & checked for disinfectant (if applicable).
3e. Take and record temperature, blood pressure, and weight.
3d. Be able to describe usual post-dialysis access dressing.
3c. Know direction of flow in the access (arterial and venous side).
3b. Perform skin prep on access.
3a. Put pressure on access site after needle removal.
2b. Recite and participate in facility emergency procedures for fire, earthquake, weather-related emergencies.
2a. Recite the steps of an emergency disconnect from the dialysis machine.
9b Insert hemodialysis needles unassisted.
9a. Know how to troubleshoot dialysis machine (i.e., power or
water failure, dialyzer leak, air in the lines, serious symptoms).
7e. Know medication purpose, dosage, and frequency during dialysis.
7d. Know what normal lab values are and how theirs compare (potassium, phosphorus,
calcium, BUN, Hct, albumin, Kt/V/URR, PTH. Diabetics should know their HgbA1c).
7c. Know if the machine is set up appropriately (correct dialysate flow, sodium modeling,
heparin pump settings, TMP/UF rate).
7b. Know their desired and usual blood flow rate.
7a. Know own normal venous and arterial pressure.
1d. Know type of access, check blood flow daily, protect access from blood draws/IVs/BPs, report symptoms (i.e., swelling, redness, loss of sensation).
1c. Prepare station with personal items (i.e., blankets, books, craft materials, food and drink if unit policy permits, etc.).
1b. Tear tape strips to be used on access.
1a. Know name, purpose, dose, & frequency of medications taken off dialysis.
Figure 2: Example of Self-Care Steps
Bridging the Barriers: A Practical Guide to Renal Rehabilitation, Life Options
A third step is to encourage patients to dialyze at home, either with PD or home HD.
Home dialysis empowers patients to dialyze to live, rather than live for dialysis. Home
therapies make working—and continued employer group coverage—far more likely.
And the continuous forms of home HD also allow for much less rigid dietary and fluid
restrictions and fewer symptoms (less feeling tired, cramping, dizziness, shortness of
breath, or feeling cold) for a better quality of life.
xvii
Technicians across the nation learn
how to do dialysis every day, and for them, dialysis is a job. For a patient, dialysis means
life. Schrieber et al (2000) found among 11,000 patients that predialysis modality
education increased the percent of patients choosing home dialysis (in this case PD) to
40%.
xviii
This suggests that patients’ interest in and willingness to do home dialysis has
been systematically underestimated. In terms of the multitasking, manual dexterity,
visual acuity, life-and-death outcomes, and need for several weeks of training, learning
home dialysis is very much like driving a car. Many of your patients drive—and those
who can’t may have someone to drive them who could be a home dialysis partner.
In conclusion, we hope this article will help you see that almost any patient has the
potential to be empowered, even if they resist it at first. Putting the initial investment in
time and effort into empowering your patients has the potential payoff of helping your
patients live longer with better quality of life, saving your clinic money and improving
clinic revenues, and reducing your job stress and improving your job satisfaction. The
ball is in your court. What will you do with it?
Empowerment Tools and Resources
Kidney School™ (www.kidneyschool.org), Life Options’ research-based self-
management learning center. On-line modules are interactive; downloadable pdfs are
also available. Patients, family members, and staff new to dialysis will benefit.
Home Dialysis Central (www.homedialysis.org), offers information to raise
awareness and use of five types of PD and home hemo.
Living a Healthy Life With Chronic Conditions; 2nd Edition: Self-Management of
Heart Disease, Arthritis, Stroke, Diabetes, Asthma, Bronchitis, Emphysema & Others.
by Kate Lorig RN DrPH, Halsted Holman MD, David Sobel MD, Diana Laurent
MPH, Virginia González MPH, and Marian Minor RPT PhD. Bull Publishing, 2000.
Patient Education: A Practical Approach; 3rd Edition. by Kate Lorig and
Associates. SAGE Publications, 2000.
*The Kidney Care Quality & Improvement Act (S. 635/HR 1298) includes provisions to
fund pilot programs in predialysis education and to study barriers to home dialysis, as
well as an annual update for dialysis reimbursement. Contact your elected federal
representatives about sponsorship of these important bills.
References
i
Curtin RB, Johnson HK, Schatell D. The peritoneal dialysis experience: insights from long-term patients.
Nephrol Nurs J. 31(6):615-625, 2004
ii
Curtin RB, Mapes DL. Health care management strategies of long-term dialysis survivors. Nephrol Nurs
J. 28(4):385-394, 2001
iii
Curtin RB, Mapes D, Petillo M, Oberley E. Long-term dialysis survivors: a transformational experience.
Qualitative Health Res. 12(5):609-624, 2002
iv
Tsay SL, Healstead M. Self-care self-efficacy, depression, and quality of life among patients receiving
hemodialysis in Taiwan. Int J Nurs Stud. 39(3):245-51, 2002
v
Tsay SL. Self-efficacy training for patients with end-stage renal disease. J Adv Nurs. 43(4):370-5, 2003
vi
Tsay SL, Hung LO. Empowerment of patients with end-stage renal diseasea randomized controlled
trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 41(1):59-65, 2004
vii
Curtin RB, Sitter DC, Schatell D, Chewning BA. Self-management, knowledge, and functioning and
well-being of patients on hemodialysis. Nephrol Nurs J. 31(4):378-86, 396, 2004.
viii
Lowrie EG, Curtin RB, LePain N, Schatell D. Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36: A consistent
and powerful predictor of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis
41(6):1286-1292, 2003.
ix
Witten B, Schatell DR, Becker BN. Relationship of ESRD working-age patient employment to treatment
modality. (Abstract) J Am Soc Nephrol 15:633A, 2004.
x
George Hathaway, Aksys, personal communication, January 19, 2005.
xi
Life Options Rehabilitation Program. Revisiting an Exemplary Practices Award Winner: Dialysis Center
of Lincoln continues its tradition of excellence. Renal Rehabilitation Report in Nephrol News
Issues 17(7):S 8-9, 2003.
xii
Pfizer. Health literacy statistics at a glance. http://www.pfizerhealthliteracy.com/healthliteracystats.pdf
xiii
U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2004 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the
United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and
Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2004
xiv
U.S. Renal Data System. Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study (Wave 2) in USRDS 1997 Annual
Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health,
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 1997
xv
Devins GM, Mendelssohn DC, Barre PE, Binik YM. Predialysis psychoeducational intervention and
coping styles influence time to dialysis in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 42(4):693-
703, 2003
xvi
Stack AG, Martin DR. Association of patient autonomy with increased transplantation and survival
among new dialysis patients in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 45(4):730-42, 2005
xvii
Heidenheim MA, Muirhead N, Moist L, Lindsay RM. Patient quality of life on quotidian hemodialysis.
Am J Kidney Dis. 42(1) Suppl 1:S36-S41, 2003
xviii
Schreiber M, Ilamanthi E, Wolfson M, Fender D, Mueller S, Baudoin M. Preliminary findings from the
National Pre-ESRD Education Initiative. Nephrol News Issues. 14(12):44-6, 2000
... In addition, trained nurses with a younger age, despite having a length of service of less than 10 years, show a greater inclination to act the psycho-educational competences acquired during the relational path formation. The results obtained from this study will enhance those in literature; for this reason, today more than ever, healthcare organizations and nursing professionals are called upon to invest in the development of core competencies for improving education in the health of chronically ill patients (38,(41)(42)(43)(44). With this is mind, specific training in the field of Cardiology is an advantage on different levels: for the patient, in terms of health, for professionals, as they develop advanced skills, making more timely and effective answers and finally for organizations that can draw new organizational structures, capable of responding to the growing health needs. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background and aim: The therapeutic education and self-management carried out by nurses, are winning elements in cardiovascular secondary prevention, but because they are complex matters, they require special training by the professionals. The target of the study has been to assess the effects in clinical practice of a training program for nurses in the management of patients with cardiovascular diseases, leaning towards a self-oriented patient management and therapeutic patient education. Method: The research utilized a quali-quantitative study to compare the responses of 53 trained nurses (experimental group) and 101 untrained nurses (control group). The instrument used was a self-report structured in two sections: the first, a qualitative kind, was used to investigate the portrayal of nurses regarding self-management; the second, a quantitative kind, included a Likert scale based on 5 points (1=never, 5=always) that investigated the professional nurse's action in its bio-psycho-socio-relational and clinical activities (La Sala, 2012). Results: The trained nurses' approach is more oriented towards the psycho-socio-relational dimension, compared to the untrained nurses. A difference also emerged regarding activities of a bio clinical nature, which are performed much more by untrained nurses compared to trained professionals. Conclusions: The health education and self-management skills were used by trained nurses during their care of patients with cardiovascular diseases, stressing the importance for professional nurses to develop an integrated competence, using narrative talks as the main tool in a patient-centred approach.
... Irrational thoughts such as mental shortcuts (ignoring some medical conditions), altered risk perceptions of behaviours, cognitive trickery (distorted views about controlling conditions) and using denial as form of coping have also been reported to contribute to non-adherence [70]. The challenges associated with living with CKD are significant and may contribute to patients feeling that they have lost control of their lives [71]. Disturbance in self-concept may lead to depression, with associated suicidal thoughts and poor selfesteem manifested by poor self-hygiene, excessive dependency and lack of adherence to treatment requirements [65]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Non-adherence to comprehensive management of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) remains a significant barrier to effective management of the population. Interventions to improve adherence need to target the contributing factors to enhance the quality of life. Objective: To highlight the factors contributing to non-adherence in CKD patients. Methods: Articles were identified from online data bases namely Medline, PubMed, Cinahl, Google scholar and Grey literature. A comprehensive search was done to identify articles which highlight the factors contributing to non-adherence in CKD patients. The following words were used for this search: Adherence & non-adherence, factors contributing to non-adherence to dialysis, medication, diet and fluid, CKD patients. 96 of them were identified. Results: Six categories of factors contributing to nonadherence were identified. These were patient related, socioeconomic factors, psychological factors, therapy related factors, pathophysiological related factors and health care system related factors. Conclusion: Non adherence remains a major obstacle in the effective management of CKD population. There is need for collaborative approach to devise measures that eliminate relevant contributing factors to non-adherence in CKD patients.
... The construct of autonomy support has been linked to improved glycemic control in diabetic subjects (Williams et al., 1998a(Williams et al., , 2004(Williams et al., , 2005(Williams et al., , 2009) and improved medication adherence in adult outpatients with chronic diseases such as hypertension, hyperthyroidism, menopausal symptoms, arthritis and seizure disorders (Williams et al., 1998b). The perception of autonomy support from providers has, at times, been termed patient empowerment, which has been linked to improved outcomes for dialysis patients (McCarley, 2009;Schatell & Witten, 2005;Tsay & Hung, 2004). One noteworthy finding that emerged from a qualitative study of subjects receiving dialysis for an average of 21 years is that their transformation into comprehensive, active managers of their disease had been a critical element of their success in handling this chronic condition (Curtin et al., 2002). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study was designed to assess dialysis subjects' perceived autonomy support association with phosphate binder medication adherence, race and gender. A multi-site cross-sectional study was conducted among 377 dialysis subjects. The Health Care Climate (HCC) Questionnaire assessed subjects' perception of their providers' autonomy support for phosphate binder use, and adherence was assessed by the self-reported Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Serum phosphorus was obtained from the medical record. Regression models were used to examine independent factors of medication adherence, serum phosphorus, and differences by race and gender. Non-white HCC scores were consistently lower compared with white subjects' scores. No differences were observed by gender. Reported phosphate binder adherence was associated with HCC score, and also with phosphorus control. No significant association was found between HCC score and serum phosphorus. Autonomy support, especially in non-white end stage renal disease subjects, may be an appropriate target for culturally informed strategies to optimize mineral bone health.
... A systematic review 104 on this subject however comes to the conclusion that patients have contributed to the planning and development of services (mainly on structure and information sources) across a range of settings but that the effects of this process on the quality and effectiveness of services are unknown, mentioning a possible barrier on the policy side, as strong patient opinions can influence health care decisions to the disadvantage of policy makers. A similar barrier may be expected from the medical side as a demanding and wellinformed patient may lead to a power struggle with the "expert" 105 . ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate if the application of chlorhexidine-based solutions (ChloraPrep®) to the exit site and the hub of long-term hemodialysis catheters could prevent catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) and prolong catheter survival when compared with povidone–iodine solutions. There were 20,784 catheter days observed. Povidone–iodine solutions (Betadine®) were used in the first half of the study and ChloraPrep® was used in the second half for all the patients. Both groups received chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings at the exit sites. The use of Chloraprep® significantly decreased the incidence of CRB (1.0 vs 2.2/1,000 catheter days, respectively, P = 0.0415), and hospitalization due to CRB (1.8days vs 4.1days/1,000 catheter days, respectively, P = 0.0416). The incidence of exit site infection was similar for the two groups. Both the period of overall catheter survival (207.6days vs 161.1days, P = 0.0535) and that of infection-free catheter survival (122.0days vs 106.9days, P = 0.1100) tended to be longer for the catheters cleansed with ChloraPrep®, with no statistical significance. In conclusion, chlorhexidine-based solutions are more effective for the prevention of CRB than povidone–iodine solutions. This positive impact cannot be explained by decreased number of exit site infections. This study supports the notion that the catheter hub is the entry site for CRB.
Article
Full-text available
Patient empowerment is centered on the belief that patients should be in control of their own care and that behavioral changes and adherence to therapies cannot be achieved unless patients internalize the need for self-change. Data have consistently shown improved outcomes among patients on dialysis who are engaged, empowered and self-managing. Motivational interviewing provides a technique that can be applied by nephrology nurses to partner with patients and engage them in the management of their own care.
Article
Full-text available
This editorial commentary discusses the strategies for prevention of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) in children on hemodialysis, which is associated with high morbidity and the increase of hospital cost. There is evidence that the use of arteriovenous fistulae in children on hemodialysis is associated with lower infection rates. Therefore, the use of catheters in these patients should be decreased by improving arteriovenous fistulae use rates or by increasing peritoneal dialysis patient recruitment. However, despite the wide adoption of such policies, hemodialysis catheters are still being used in a significant number of cases. For these patients, implementation of effective strategies for preventing contamination of the catheter hub should be a priority. The appropriate recording and evaluation of CRB rates are important for assessing preventive policies. In addition, the successful management of a CRB is essential for preventing recurrence of bacteremia. Recently it was documented in a number of randomized clinical trials that antimicrobial lock solutions were effective for preventing CRB. It is suggested that the use of antimicrobial locks should be considered in children who are at high risk of developing CRB, with caution for their long-term use, because of the possibility of bacterial resistance. Now is the time for action, and all preventive steps should be performed simultaneously to minimize the risk of CRB.
Article
The renewed interest in home dialysis therapies makes it pertinent to address the essentials of establishing and running a successful home dialysis program. The success of a home program depends on a clear understanding of the structure of the home program team, the physical plant, educational tool requirements, reimbursement sources and a business plan. A good command of the technical and economic aspects is important, but the primary drivers for the creation and growth of a home dialysis program are the confidence and commitment of the nephrological team.
Article
Full-text available
In this exploratory/descriptive study, the authors examined processes involved in some kidney patients’ability to survive on dialysis. Through long semistructured interviews with 18 dialysis survivors, they identified four self-affirmations that characterized participants’ restructuring of self and four sets of illness experiences that required restructuring within the context of their extant worlds. The denouement involved the participants’ transformation into comprehensive, active self-managers of their disease, its treatment, and its manifestations. The authors describe the participants’affirmations and adaptations leading to transformation. Understanding this process paves the way for research into the timing and sequence entailed in transformation and lays the groundwork for the development of interventions to guide kidney failure patients to the positive outcome of transformation: comprehensive, active self-management.
Article
Full-text available
Studies have shown improved quality of life for hemodialysis (HD) patients after changing from conventional thrice-weekly HD treatment to more frequent HD. In the London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study, 23 patients (11 patients, short daily HD; 12 patients, long nocturnal HD) were compared with 22 conventional thrice-weekly HD patients serving as controls. All patients completed 3 sets of quality-of-life assessment tools: (1) a locally developed renal disease-specific questionnaire that assessed dialysis symptoms, uremic symptoms, psychosocial stress, and social-leisure activity; (2) the generic Medical Outcomes Survey 36-Item Short Form (SF-36); and (3) the global Health Utilities Index (HUI). As a supplement to the HUI, a subset of patients was asked to complete the Time Trade-Off assessment. Overall, the reduction in symptoms shows better fluid management because quotidian HD patients reported experiencing fewer and less severe cramping during dialysis, fewer headaches, less hypotension, fewer episodes of dizziness, decreased fluid restrictions, fewer blood pressure problems, decreased interdialytic weight gains, fewer episodes of shortness of breath, and a reduction in the sensation of easily feeling cold. HUI results showed that quotidian HD patients maintained functionality throughout the study period, whereas control patients showed a significant loss. Given the choice, all patients chose to remain on quotidian HD therapy after switching from conventional HD therapy. The Time Trade-Off analysis indicated that study patients were willing to trade far less time on quotidian HD therapy and much more time on conventional HD therapy in exchange for "perfect" health. As more studies focus on improved patient outcomes and appropriate funding mechanisms are established, more frequent home HD treatment should become a standard treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease.
Article
Full-text available
Past research suggests that patients' self-management behavior and knowledge about their condition/treatment may impact functioning and well-being. Specific self-management activities used by patients on hemodialysis have included cooperative/participatory and protective/proactive strategies. In this cross-sectional study, measures of self-management and knowledge were administered to 372 patients on hemodialysis-from 17 dialysis facilities. Findings suggest that the patients studied were low self-managers. The most commonly used self-management strategies were the cooperative/participatory activities of self-care during hemodialysis and shared responsibility in care. Multiple linear regression showed self-care during hemodialysis to be positively associated with physical functioning, measured by the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) scale. Age, diabetes, and two protective/proactive strategies (selective symptom management and assertive self-advocacy) were negatively associated with the PCS-12. Selective symptom management was also negatively associated with mental health functioning measured by the SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS-12), whereas patient knowledge of kidney disease/treatment was positively associated with the MCS-12. Because past research has shown the SF-36 PCS and the MCS scores to be associated with mortality and hospitalizations, using cooperative/participatory self-management behaviors, minimizing the need for protective/proactive strategies, and increasing patients' knowledge of kidney disease may have long-term benefits.
Article
The purpose of this study is to examine relationships among self-care self-efficacy, depression, and quality of life in 160 patients receiving hemodialysis. The study is a descriptive, correlational design. Measures include Strategies Used by People to Promote Health, the Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Quality of Life Index. Results indicate that self-care self-efficacy and depression are the significant predictors of quality of life after controlling for the effect of age. Self-care self-efficacy explains 47.5% of the variance (beta=0.52, p<0.001) and depression (beta=-0.29, p<0.001) explains an additional 5.5% of variance in quality of life. The study provides important information for health care providers as they design interventions for patients receiving hemodialysis.
Article
Regardless of age or race, more patients preferred peritoneal dialysis (PD) than would be expected from the current ratio of patients treated with PD in the U.S. The percent of patients choosing PD seems to be largely influenced by the scope of information they receive prior to therapy initiation. In the absence of thorough treatment option education, a significant number of patients may be assigned a therapy when, in reality, they would have selected an alternative option. There is a need to further understand the correlation between a practice's PD utilization rate and the extent to which patients are given dialysis treatment options.
Article
This qualitative, exploratory-descriptive study describes self-management strategies of long-term survivors of dialysis. Data were collected via long, semi-structured interviews with 18 individuals, 10 male and 8 female, who had been on dialysis for more than 15 years. Of these, 10 participants were Caucasian, 4 were African-American, and 4 were Hispanic. Respondents ranged in age from 38 to 63 years. Interviews were audio-recorded, and verbatim transcriptions of interviews were analyzed according to a content analytic procedure, with movement from specific to general. Six broad patient self-management strategies were identified: impression management, selective symptom report/management, vigilant oversight of care, self-proposal of treatments, active self-advocacy, and independent adoption of treatments/use of alternative therapies. For the individuals interviewed, self-management was largely constituted as management of the health care system and health care providers who represent it. Although the small sample size and the exploratory-descriptive methodology limit generalizability, valuable insights into techniques for self-management were derived. Such insights pave the way for future research into characteristics that distinguish dialysis patients who have the potential to be effective self-managers. More importantly, understanding of successful self-management by individuals on dialysis lays the groundwork for development of interventions to help other patients develop similar positive self-management strategies.
Article
One of the guidelines released by the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) recommends that patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 undergo regular assessment of functioning and well-being (FWB) to establish baselines, monitor changes in FWB over time, and assess the effect of interventions on FWB. Although this recommendation stresses the importance of assessing and monitoring physical and mental health functioning, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36) might also be useful for predicting crucial longer-term patient outcomes. This cross-sectional study tested the hypothesis that the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scales of the MOS SF-36 predict morbidity (measured as hospitalization) and mortality rates among dialysis patients. Data were collected from 13,952 prevalent dialysis patients served by Fresenius Medical Care North America including age, gender, race, diabetes, serum albumin, creatinine, bicarbonate, potassium, phosphorus, hemoglobin, iron, ferritin, white blood cell count, urea reduction ratio, serum glutamic oxaloacetic-transaminase, and systolic blood pressure. FWB was measured via the MOS SF-36 Summary scale scores, PCS, and MCS. Also collected was information about hospitalizations and patient mortality. PCS and MCS were consistent predictors of hospitalizations and mortality rates even after adjustment for clinically relevant factors. Because PCS and MCS are associated with hospitalization and mortality, administering this self-report measure may serve as a valuable supplement to clinical measures traditionally relied on to predict patient outcomes. Moreover, such information may be unavailable through any other single mechanism.
Article
Patients with end-stage renal disease often fail to follow a prescribed diet and fluid regimen, which undermines the effectiveness of care and leads to unpredictable progression of the disease and greater likelihood of complications. The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to examine the effectiveness of self-efficacy training on fluid intake compliance. This study took place in northern Taiwan. Eligible patients were receiving routine haemodialysis; 20-65 years of age; living in a community setting; able to read and write; and willing to participate. Sixty-two end-stage renal disease patients participated in the study. Those in the experimental group (n = 31) received 12 sessions of structured self-efficacy training; the control group patients (n = 31) received only routine care. The intervention was based on Bandura's theory and included an educational component, performance mastery, experience sharing, and stress management. The outcome measure was the mean body weight gain between dialysis sessions. Data were collected at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months following the intervention and analysed by a descriptive and repeated-measures anova. Experimental group mean weight gains decreased gradually following self-efficacy training. However, control group mean weight gains decreased only slightly over time. These results were statistically significant when baseline differences controlled for (P < 0.05). The study supports the effectiveness of the self-efficacy training in controlling mean body weight gains of end-stage renal disease patients receiving haemodialysis.
Article
Consensus endorses predialysis intervention before the onset of end-stage renal disease. In a previous study, predialysis psychoeducational intervention (PPI) extended time to dialysis therapy by a median of 6 months. We undertook to replicate and extend this finding by examining hypothesized mechanisms. We used an inception-cohort, prospective, randomized, controlled trial with follow-up to evaluate an intervention that included an interactive 1-on-1 slide-supported educational session, a printed summary (booklet), and supportive telephone calls once every 3 weeks. Participants were sampled from 15 Canadian (tertiary care) nephrology units and included 297 patients with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) expected to require renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 6 to 18 months. The main outcome was time to dialysis therapy (censored at 18 months if still awaiting RRT). Time to dialysis therapy was significantly longer (median, 17.0 months) for the PPI group than the usual-care control group (median, 14.2 months; Cox's proportional hazards analysis, controlling for general nonrenal health, P < 0.001). Coping by avoidance of threat-related information (called blunting) was associated with shorter times to dialysis therapy (P < 0.032). A group x blunting interaction (P < 0.069) indicated: (1) time to dialysis therapy was shortened in the usual-care group, especially when patients coped by blunting; but (2) time to dialysis therapy was extended with PPI, even among patients who coped by blunting. Knowledge acquisition predicted time to dialysis therapy (r = 0.14; P < 0.013). Time to dialysis therapy was unrelated to depression or social support. PPI extends time to dialysis therapy in patients with progressive CKD. The mechanism may involve the acquisition and implementation of illness-related knowledge. Routine follow-up also may be especially important when patients cope by avoiding threat-related information.
Article
The purpose of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of an empowerment program on empowerment level, self-care self-efficacy and depression in patients with end-stage renal disease. The study was a randomized controlled trial; qualified patients in two dialysis centers of major hospitals in southern Taiwan were randomly assigned into an empowerment group (n=25) and a control group (n=25). The empowerment program included identification of problem areas for self-management; exploration of emotions associated with these problems; development of a set of goals and strategies to overcome these problems to achieve these goals; creation and implementation of behavioral change plans; and stress management. The outcomes measured were the Empowerment Scale, the Strategies Used by People to Promote Health and the Beck Depression Inventory. Data were collected at baseline and 6 weeks following intervention. Primary statistical analysis was by means of t-test and analysis of covariance. The results indicated that scores of the empowerment (t(48)=6.54, p<0.001), self-care self-efficacy (F(1,47)=10.82, p=0.002) and depression (t(48)=2.49, p=0.03) in the empowerment group have a significantly greater improvement than the control group.