Article

Trends in body size across an environmental gradient: A differential response in scavenging and non-scavenging demersal deep-sea fish

British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (Impact Factor: 5.05). 11/2005; 272(1576):2051-7. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3189
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Body size trends across environmental gradients are widely reported but poorly understood. Here, we investigate contrasting relationships between size (body mass) and depth in the scavenging and predatory demersal ichthyofauna (800-4800 m) of the North-east Atlantic. The mean size of scavenging fish, identified as those regularly attracted to baited cameras, increased significantly with depth, while in non-scavengers there was a significant decline in size. The increase in scavenger size is a consequence of both intra and inter-specific effects. The observation of opposing relationships, in different functional groups, across the same environmental gradient indicates ecological rather than physiological causes. Simple energetic models indicate that the dissimilarity can be explained by different patterns of food distribution. While food availability declines with depth for both groups, the food is likely to be in large, randomly distributed packages for scavengers and as smaller but more evenly distributed items for predators. Larger size in scavengers permits higher swimming speeds, greater endurance as a consequence of larger energy reserves and lower mass specific metabolic rate, factors that are critical to survival on sporadic food items.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Imants G Priede
  • Source
    • "The potential decline in fractional size at particularly deep depths could suggest that there is a depth limit to the benefits of a stable environment. For example, food availability may be too low to support large individuals, which has been found to be the case for certain functional groups (Collins et al. 2005). Accounting for the population fractional size structure by including observed length of individuals as well as their potential length at the species level allows a more accurate description of the function of the assemblage as a whole. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1.Variation within species is an often-overlooked aspect of community ecology, despite the fact that the ontogenetic structure of populations influences processes right up to the ecosystem level. Accounting for traits at the individual level is an important advance in the implementation of trait-based approaches in understanding community structure and function. 2.We incorporate individual- and species-level traits into one succinct assemblage structure metric, fractional size, which is calculated as the length of an individual divided by its potential maximum length. We test the implementation of fractional size in demersal fish assemblages along a depth gradient in the deep sea. We use data from an extensive trawl survey at depths of 300-2030m on the continental slope of the Rockall Trough, Northeast Atlantic, to compare changes in fractional size structure along an environmental gradient to those seen using traditional taxonomic and trait-based approaches. 3.The relationship between fractional size and depth was particularly strong, with the overall pattern being an increase with depth, implying that individuals move deeper as they grow. Body size increased with depth at the intra-specific and assemblage levels. Fractional size, size structure and species composition all varied among assemblages, and this variation could be explained by the depth that the assemblage occupied. 4.The inclusion of individual-level traits and population fractional size structure adds to our understanding at the assemblage level. Fractional size, or where an individual is in its growth trajectory, appears to be an especially important driver of assemblage change with depth. This has implications for understanding fisheries impacts in the deep sea and how these impacts may propagate across depths. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Journal of Animal Ecology
  • Source
    • "This observed trend agrees with previous studies that showed a depth-related increase in size for scavenging bony fishes39 and small-sized (< 1 m TL) sharks40. In the water column where food availability decreases with depth, a larger size is believed to represent a metabolic advantage to scavenge in the deep sea's oligotrophic environment39. However, our dataset contains only similarly aged specimens i.e. specimens close to maturity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Counterilluminating animals use ventral photogenic organs (photophores) to mimic the residual downwelling light and cloak their silhouette from upward-looking predators. To cope with variable conditions of pelagic light environments they typically adjust their luminescence intensity. Here, we found evidence that bioluminescent sharks instead emit a constant light output and move up and down in the water column to remain cryptic at iso-luminance depth. We observed, across 21 globally distributed shark species, a correlation between capture depth and the proportion of a ventral area occupied by photophores. This information further allowed us, using visual modelling, to provide an adaptive explanation for shark photophore pattern diversity: in species facing moderate predation risk from below, counterilluminating photophores were partially co-opted for bioluminescent signalling, leading to complex patterns. In addition to increase our understanding of pelagic ecosystems our study emphasizes the importance of bioluminescence as a speciation driver.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2014 · Scientific Reports
  • Source
    • "The occurrence of larger fish in deeper waters has been reported in marine (MacPherson and Duarte, 1991; Collins et al., 2005) and freshwater (Wells, 1968; Burczynski et al., 1987) environments. However, like in the LMR, results have been inconsistent and dependent upon the locations investigated and the sampling techniques used. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A substantial body of literature exists about depth distribution of fish in oceans, lakes and reservoirs, but less is known about fish depth distribution in large rivers. Most of the emphasis on fish distributions in rivers has focused on longitudinal and latitudinal spatial distributions. Knowledge on depth distribution is necessary to understand species and community habitat needs. Considering this void, our goal was to identify patterns in fish benthic distribution along depth gradients in the Lower Mississippi River. Fish were collected over 14 years in depths down to 27 m. Fish exhibited non-random depth distributions that varied seasonally and according to species. Species richness was highest in shallow water, with about 50% of the 62 species detected no longer collected in water deeper than 8 m and about 75% no longer collected in water deeper than 12 m. Although richness was highest in shallow water, most species were not restricted to shallow water. Rather, most species used a wide range of depths. A weak depth zonation occurred, not as strong as that reported for deep oceans and lakes. Larger fish tended to occur in deeper water during the high-water period of an annual cycle, but no correlation was evident during the low-water period. The advent of landscape ecology has guided river research to search for spatial patterns along the length of the river and associated floodplains. Our results suggest that fish assemblages in large rivers are also structured vertically. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2014 · River Research and Applications
Show more