Content uploaded by Alexander George Panossian
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Alexander George Panossian on Nov 21, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
STIMULATING EFFECT OF ADAPTOGENS 819
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/ptr.1751
REVIEW ARTICLE
Stimulating Effect of Adaptogens: An Overview
with Particular Reference to their Efficacy
following Single Dose Administration
A. Panossian1* and H. Wagner2
1Swedish Herbal Institute, Viktor Rydbergsgatan 10, SE-411 32, Gothenburg, Sweden
2Centre of Pharma-Research, Pharmaceutical Biology, Butenandtstr. 5, University of Munich, D-81377 Munich, Germany
Plant adaptogens are compounds that increase the ability of an organism to adapt to environmental factors
and to avoid damage from such factors. The beneficial effects of multi-dose administration of adaptogens are
mainly associated with the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, a part of the stress-system that is
believed to play a primary role in the reactions of the body to repeated stress and adaptation. In contrast, the
single dose application of adaptogens is important in situations that require a rapid response to tension or to
a stressful situation. In this case, the effects of the adaptogens are associated with another part of the stress-
system, namely, the sympatho–adrenal-system (SAS), that provides a rapid response mechanism mainly to
control the acute reaction of the organism to a stressor. This review focuses primarily on the SAS-mediated
stimulating effects of single doses of adaptogens derived from Rhodiola rosea, Schizandra chinensis and
Eleutherococcus senticosus. The use of these drugs typically generates no side effects, unlike traditional
stimulants that possess addiction, tolerance and abuse potential, produce a negative effect on sleep structure,
and cause rebound hypersomnolence or ‘come down’ effects. Furthermore, single administration of these
adaptogens effectively increases mental performance and physical working capacity in humans. R. rosea is the
most active of the three plant adaptogens producing, within 30 min of administration, a stimulating effect that
continues for at least 4– 6 h. The active principles of the three plants that exhibit single dose stimulating effects
are glycosides of phenylpropane- and phenylethane-based phenolic compounds such as salidroside, rosavin,
syringin and triandrin, the latter being the most active. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: adaptogens; stimulating effect; single dose effect; clinical trials.
Received 13 June 2005
Accepted 20 September 2005
* Correspondence to: Professor A. Panossian, Swedish Herbal Institute,
Viktor Rydbergsgatan 10, SE-411 32, Gothenburg, Sweden.
E-mail: ap@shi.se
INTRODUCTION
Sensory adaptation is defined as the change in the
excitability of a sense organ during continuous stimula-
tion, the result of which is that increasingly intense
stimuli are required to produce the same response.
Physiological adaptation is defined as a biochemical
change in an organism that results from exposure
to certain environmental conditions or stressors and
generates a more effective response to them. Such
adaptive changes convey the organism from its normal
steady state (homeostasis) to a heightened level of
dynamic equilibrium (heterostasis) or to the so-called
state of non-specific resistance (SNSR) (Lasarev, 1962;
Brekhman and Dardymov, 1968) of the stress system
(a function of the neuroendocrine-immune complex)
(Chrousos and Gold, 1992). The general adaptation
syndrome has three stages: the alarm reaction, being
the point at which the body detects the external
stimulus; adaptation, during which the body engages
defensive countermeasures against the stressor; and
exhaustion, where the body begins to run out of
defences (Selye, 1950). Stress, including both eustress
820 A. PANOSSIAN AND H. WAGNER
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
and distress (roughly meaning challenge and overload,
respectively), may be the result of negative or positive
events. Whilst eustress is essential to life (in the sense,
for example, that exercise is required to avoid muscular
atrophy), distress can cause disease. Eustress, however,
raises the levels of adrenaline and prostaglandins in the
body, which in turn increases the heart-rate, respira-
tion and blood pressure and places greater physical
stress on the body organs. Long-term stress can induce
heart disease, high blood pressure, strokes and other
illnesses (Chrousos et al., 1995; Fink, 2000).
In the mid 1900s it was suggested that SNSR could
be achieved either by gradually training the organism
to withstand the effect of the stressor, or by application
of biological response modifiers, i.e. chemicals that could
directly raise the organism to a state of heterostasis.
Such pharmacologically active compounds were given
the name ‘adaptogens’ (Lasarev, 1962). As originally
defined, an adaptogen was a substance that: (a) showed
some non-specific effect, such as increasing bodily
resistance to physically, chemically or biologically
noxious agents or factors; (b) had a normalizing
influence on a pathological state, independent of the
nature of that state; and (c) was innocuous and did not
disturb body functions at a normal level (Brekhman
and Dardymov, 1968). More recently, plant adaptogens
have been defined as compounds that increase the
ability of an organism to adapt to environmental
factors and to avoid damage from such factors
(Panossian et al., 1999a).
The repeated administration of adaptogens gives
rise to an adaptogenic, or stress-protective, effect in
a manner analogous to that produced by repeated
physical exercise, leading to prolonged SNSR and
increased endurance and stamina under extreme
conditions (Dardymov, 1976; Lupandin and Lapajev,
1981; Viru, 1981; Saratikov and Krasnov, 2004). Such
repeat doses of adaptogens have been shown to be of
particular value in sports medicine in which the anti-
fatigue effect can lead, for example, to the increased
endurance of long distance runners during competition
or to a more rapid recovery from a strenuous event
(Korolevich and Lupandin, 1967; Levchenko, 1971;
Lapajev, 1982; Lupandin, 1990; Bucci, 2000).
A characteristic feature of adaptogens is that they
act as eustressors or challengers (Panossian et al., 1999b).
Thus, a single administration of an adaptogen mainly
produces a challenging (stimulating or stress-agonizing)
effect (Nörr, 1993; Panossian et al., 1999b, c; ESCOP
Monographs, 2003a, b), a fact that is used in sports
medicine where a single dose of adaptogen can increase
the performance of sprinters by making them more alert
(Astanin et al., 1943; Murtazin, 1946; Dalinger, 1966;
Tuzov, 1968). It follows that the stress-protective effect
achieved by multiple administration of adaptogens
is not the result of inhibition of the stress response of
an organism, but actually of adaptive changes in the
organism as a response to the repeated stress-agonistic
effect of the drug. In other words, using pharmacological
terminology, adaptogens are stress-agonists and not
stress-antagonists (Panossian et al., 1999c).
The beneficial effect of repeated treatment with
adaptogens is mainly evident in patients suffering
from chronic disease or a disturbed state (Krasik et al.,
1970a, b; Lebedev, 1971; Lapajev, 1978; Lupandin and
Lapajev, 1981; Mikhailova, 1983; Panossian et al., 1997;
ESCOP Monographs, 2003a, b; Saratikov and Krasnov,
2004). Such effects are mainly associated with the
hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, a part of
the stress system that is believed to play a primary role
in the reactions of the body to repeated stress and
to adaptation by balancing the releases of adrenaline
(the ‘switch-on’ hormone), corticosteroids (the feed-
back regulatory ‘switch-off’ hormones that protect an
organism from overreaction), and nitric oxide (that
modulates the biosynthesis and effects of many hor-
mones and autacoids, and plays a role in the nervous,
cardiovascular, immune, gastrointestinal and endocrine
systems).
In contrast, the application of adaptogens in a single
dose is important in situations that require a rapid
response to strain or to a stressful situation. In such
cases, the effects are associated with another part of
the stress-system, namely, the sympatho–adrenal-
system (SAS). This system provides a rapid response
mechanism that mainly controls the acute response of
the organism to a stressor, resulting in increased levels
of catecholamines, neuropeptides, ATP, nitric oxide and
eicosanoids. The present review will focus primarily on
the characteristic SAS-stimulating effects of the plant
adaptogens.
THE STIMULATING EFFECT OF
ADAPTOGENS
The earliest studies of adaptogens (see Table 1) were
concerned primarily with demonstrating their ability to
increase the mental and physical working capacity in
humans (Medvedev, 1963; Dalinger, 1966; Tuzov, 1968)
and in animals following administration of single or
repeated doses (Lebedev, 1971; Lapajev, 1978; Lupandin
and Lapajev, 1981; Panossian et al., 1997; ESCOP
Monographs, 2003a, b; Saratikov and Krasnov, 2004).
It soon became clear, however, that there were very
important differences between the stimulating effects
of adaptogens and those of other stimulants of the CNS
and these are summarized in Table 2 (Fulder, 1980).
Stimulants, defined as drugs that increase the activity
of the sympathetic nervous system, produce a sense of
euphoria and can be used to increase alertness and the
ability to concentrate on mental tasks. Stimulants such
as caffeine, nicotine, amphetamines and cocaine, are
also used, and sometimes abused, to boost endurance
and productivity. However, long-term stimulant abuse
can impair mental function and lead to psychotic symp-
toms. Furthermore, traditional stimulants that possess
addiction, tolerance and abuse potential, produce a
negative effect on sleep structure, and cause rebound
hypersomnolence or ‘come down’ effects. By definition,
plant adaptogens do not exhibit such negative effects:
in fact one plant adaptogen, that derived from Rhodiola
rosea, has been shown significantly to regulate high-
altitude sleep disorders and to improve sleep quality
(Ha et al., 2002).
Plant adaptogens stimulate the nervous system
by mechanisms that are totally different from those
of traditional stimulants, being associated rather with
metabolic regulation of various elements of the stress-
system and modulation of stimulus-response coupling
(Petkov, 1978; Bombardelli et al., 1980; Hasan Samira
STIMULATING EFFECT OF ADAPTOGENS 821
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Table 1. Results of human studies involving single dose effects of plant adaptogens on physical and mental performance
Reference to
study
Aksenova
et al.
, 1968
Andrejev and
Georgijev, 1958
Astanin
et al.
,
1943
Berdyshev, 1995
Study
design
a
PC, SB
?
C, CO
PC, CO
Number of
subjects in
the study (
n
)
46
19
13
357 sailors
Age range
of subjects
20–28
?
?
?
Daily dose
2.5 mg
25 drops
2mL
0.25, 0.5,
1.0, 2.0,
4.0 and
8.0 mL
Type of preparation
tested
Salidroside
Schizandra chinensis
fruits 70% tincture, 1:3
S. chinensis
tincture,
phenamine, caffeine,
48% ethanol
Eleutherococcus
senticosus
extract
S. chinensis
extract
Duration
of study
Acute
Acute
Acute
Acute
Classification of
evidence level
according to
WHO, FDA
and EMEA
b
IIa
III
IIb
IIa
Effects recorded
Improved mental performance; reduced the
number of errors in Anfimov’s correction test;
stimulating effect lasting 4 h or more
Increased muscular working capacity
Improved running time in 60% of athletes
E. senticosus
improved mental performance
in correction test; increased activity of the
adrenal cortex (excretion of 17-ketosteroids in
the urine), the activity of the sympathetic
adrenomedullar system (in orthostatic test),
the intensity of metabolic processes (excretion
of vitamin C in the urine), and the intensity
of red-ox processes. In stress conditions
E. senticosus
decreased adrenal cortex activity
and sympathetic nervous system; increased
the tonus of the parasympathetic nervous
system; moderately intensified excitation of
the CNS and of energy metabolism; improved
endurance to hypoxia
S. chinensis
stimulated the activity of the
CNS at night (activated excitation processes
and normalized nervous processes ratio);
increased tonus of the sympathetic part of the
autonomic nervous system (having no effect
on the parasympathetic part) after night duty;
activated the adrenal cortex activity;
increased the activity of the cardiovascular
and respiratory systems; intensified
oxidation-reduction and metabolic processes;
improved working ability parameters;
reduced parameters of non-specific resistance
the organism
822 A. PANOSSIAN AND H. WAGNER
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Table 1. (continued)
Reference to
study
Study
design
a
Number of
subjects in
the study (
n
)
Age range
of subjects Daily dose
Type of preparation
tested
Duration
of study
Classification of
evidence level
according to
WHO, FDA
and EMEA
b
Effects recorded
Bogatova and
Malozemov, 1994
Bogatova
et al.
, 1997
Dalinger, 1966
De Bock
et al.
, 2004
Eglit
et al.
, 1965
Galochkina, 1948
60
5 cosmonauts
76 skiers at
four levels
of training
24
28 athletes
15
PC, CO,
DB
PC, DB,
CO
PC
R, PC,
DB, CO
C
Open
study
?
?
20–25
19–22
?
?
3 capsules
3 capsules
4mL
2 capsules
2, 5, 10 and
15 mL
1.6 g
ADAPT-232, fixed
combination of
standardized extracts
of
Rhodiola rosea
(salidroside 3 mg),
E. senticosus
(syringin
3 mg),
S. chinensis
(schizandrin 4 mg),
in capsules
ADAPT-232, fixed
combination of
standardized extracts of
R. rosea
,
E. senticosus
,
S. chinensis
, in capsules
E. senticosus
tincture
Standardized extract
of
R. rosea
, 100 mg
in capsule
S. chinensis
seed
20% tincture
S. chinensis
fruit
powder
Compared with placebo, ADAPT-232
significantly increased short-term memory,
speed and reliability in the understanding of
information, and precision and accuracy in
the ability to reproduce the information in
repeated highly sophisticated computer-based
tests (Monotonic 2). ADAPT-232 was most
effective against a background of pronounced
fatigue induced by monotonous night work.
The effect was most pronounced in
complicated tests and under
extreme conditions
ADAPT-232 significantly decreased the number
of mistakes (
cf.
with placebo) in complicated
psychometric tests 4 h after administration
and increased working capacity 1.5 and 4 h
after administration to Russian cosmonauts
during their training in prolonged isolation
(90 days) under conditions of long-term,
monotonous work. No significant effect was
observed in non-complicated tests
Single dose increased working capacity,
shortened recovery period in prolonged
physical load and at low temperatures
Acute intake of
R. rosea
improved endurance
exercise capacity but showed no effect after
daily intake over a 4-week period
Improved the function of the respiratory and
cardio-vascular systems, increased muscle
power of the hand muscles; reduced the time
required by athletes to complete the course
Best results were obtained with doses of 5
and 10 mL
Improved eye retina sensitivity to red
25–30 min after administration
Acute
Acute
Acute,
40 min
or 1.5 h
before a
competition
Acute and
for 4 weeks
Acute
Acute
IIa
IIa
IIb
Ib
IIb
III
STIMULATING EFFECT OF ADAPTOGENS 823
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Table 1. (continued)
Reference to
study
Study
design
a
Number of
subjects in
the study (
n
)
Age range
of subjects Daily dose
Type of preparation
tested
Duration
of study
Classification of
evidence level
according to
WHO, FDA
and EMEA
b
Effects recorded
200
sailors
80 healthy
students
(control
group) and
70 patients
with neurosis
8 males
122 students
? students
C
PC, SB
PC
CO, PC,
SB
PC
?
?
20–50
20–22
?
?
2mL
2mL
200 mL
200 mL
10 drops
or 3 × 10
drops a day
40 drops
or 3 × 10
drops a day
3g
30 mL
30 mL
30 mL
30 mL
2g
2mL
3 capsules
S. chinensis
tincture
E. senticosus
tincture
Black tea Coffee
R. rosea
extract
and
Rhaponticum
cartamoides
extract
S. chinensis
berry
dry,
S. chinensis
berry
tincture
S. chinensis
berry
decoction
S. chinensis
seed
tincture
Water and 70%
ethanol (controls)
S. chinensis
seed
powder
Panax ginseng
tincture
S. chinensis
seed
powder, 0.5 g in
capsules
Acute and
repeated
Acute and
10 days
Acute
Acute
Acute and
multiple
IIb
IIa
IIb
IIa
IIa
Grigorenko and
Berdyshev, 1988
Kaliko and
Tarasova, 1966
Karo, 1945;
Lazarev, 1946
Kochmareva,
1958
Kokhanova
et al.
, 1950
S. chinensis
showed a tonic effect for 4–7 h
in those on night duties.
E. senticosus
was
inactive
Repeated uptake (for more than 2 weeks)
of coffee and
S. chinensis
produced similar
negative effects (insomnia, excitability, etc.)
Single and repeated administration of
adaptogens improved functional state of the
CNS in patients with neurosis as characterized
by normalization of the speed and power
of neural processes in Ivanov-Smolenski’s
verbal test with speech-supported
locomotor-conditioned reflex measurement.
The memory improved and attention became
more stable
Increased physical working capacity
and physical force of men 1–3 h after
administration; tincture of
S. chinensis
seed
was most active
Improved attention in text correction 2 h after
drug administration. Both extracts increased
quality and quantity of mental work
performed
Increased physical working capacity starting
from 2.5 h after single dose administration
and lasting for 3 h. More pronounced effect
was established against a background of
fatigue. After multiple administration
S. chinensis
showed no stimulating effect
824 A. PANOSSIAN AND H. WAGNER
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Classification of
evidence level
according to
WHO, FDA
and EMEA
b
IIa
IIb
IIb
III
IIa
III
IIa
IIb
Table 1. (continued)
Reference to
study
Study
design
a
Number of
subjects in
the study (
n
)
Age range
of subjects Daily dose
Type of preparation
tested
Duration
of study Effects recorded
Komar
et al.
,
1981
Lebedev, 1951a
Lebedev, 1967
Lebedev, 1955
Lebedev, 1967
Lebedev, 1967
Marina
et al.
,
1994
Medvedev, 1963
Murtazin, 1946
254
20
23
125
20
82
13
Study A 45
soldiers;
Study B
58 subjects
PC
CO
PC
C, open
CO, PC
?
PC, SB,
CO
C
C
19–22
21
21–22
?
21–24
?
21–23
?
?
20 drops
20 drops
0.3 g
3g,
0.036– 0.168 g
0.02 g
0.01 g
0.005 g
0.02 g
0.5 g
30 mL
30 mL
0.02 g
0.5 g
1, 5, 10 and
20 mg
5 drops
2mL
2mL
6 capsules
6 capsules
Rhodiola rosea
40%
ethanol tincture
E. senticosus
40%
ethanol tincture
Extract of
R. rosea
rhizome
S. chinensis
seed,
extract and fractions,
tablets and capsules
Schizandrin
Schizandrin
Schizandrin
Phenamine
Glucose
S. chinensis
seed
tincture
P. ginseng
, 3% tincture
Phenamine
Glucose
Tyrosol
R. rosea
extract
E. senticosus
tincture
P. ginseng
tincture
S. chinensis
seed
powder, 1 g in
capsules
Acute
Acute
Acute
Acute
Acute
?
Acute
Acute
Improved mental performance; reduced the
number of errors in Anfimov’s correction test;
increased the accuracy, working capacity and
speed of information perception. Stimulating
effect lasted 4 h or more
Improved accuracy in error correction test.
Most active stimulating effect was revealed by
a crystalline substance identified as the lignan
schizandrin
Schizandrin improved accuracy in the work of
telegraph operators at exhaustion compared
with control group and those given
phenamine
Schizandrin significantly decreased running
time in a competition at 3000 m
cf.
with
control group
P. ginseng
and
S. chinensis
improved
accuracy in the work of telegraph operators
at exhaustion compared with controls and
phenamine
Improved mental performance, reduced the
number of errors in Anfimov’s correction test
Decreased errors in data sent by radio
operators 1 h after drug uptake. Stimulating
effect of
E. senticosus
was stronger and more
stable than the effect of Ginseng, which was
insignificant
Mean running time of verum group was
shorter than that of the control group in a
20 km marathon ski under stress conditions.
Fatigue, muscular pain, shortness of breath
and dryness of the mouth were reduced
STIMULATING EFFECT OF ADAPTOGENS 825
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Classification of
evidence level
according to
WHO, FDA
and EMEA
b
IIa
Ib
Ib
IIa
IIa
Ib
IIa
IIb
Table 1. (continued)
Reference to
study
Study
design
a
Number of
subjects in
the study (
n
)
Age range
of subjects Daily dose
Type of preparation
tested
Duration
of study Effects recorded
Roslyakova
et al.
, 2000
Shevtsov
et al.
, 2003
Strokina, 1967
Trusov, 1953
Trusov, 1958a
Tuzov, 1968
Yefimova
et al.
, 1954
Zotova, 1965
a
?, data not listed or unavailable; CO, crossover; DB, double-blind; SB, single blind, NC, not controlled; PC, placebo-controlled; C, controlled; R, randomized.
b
Ia, Meta-analyses of randomized and controlled studies; Ib, Evidence from at least one randomized study with control; IIa, Evidence from at least one well-performed study with control
group; IIb, Evidence from at least one well-performed quasi-experimental study; III, Evidence from well-performed non-experimental descriptive studies as well as comparative studies,
correlation studies and case-studies; and IV, Evidence from expert committee reports or appraisals and/or clinical experiences by prominent authorities.
60
161
40
120 pilots
150 healthy
males
52
7
85
PC, DB
DB, R,
PC
PC, DB
PC, SB
PC, SB
PC, SB,
R
PC, CO,
SB
PC
?
19–21
23–55
?
21–26
18–24
20–22
20–28
?
2, 3 capsules
120 mg
3g
3g
2mL
15 drops
2mL
2mL
1g
5–10 drops
Rodelim, fixed
combination of
standardized extracts
of
Rhodiola rosea
,
E. senticosus
,
S. chinensis
, in tablets
Standardized
R. rosea
extract, 185 mg
in a capsule
E. senticosus
dry
extract
S. chinensis
seed
powder, capsules
S. chinensis
seed
powder, capsules
E. senticosus
extract
Rhodiola rosea
, extract
Rhaponticum
cartamoides
extract
P. ginseng
extract
Pyridrol
S. chinensis
seed
powder, 0.5 g in
capsules
Rhodiola rosea
40%
ethanol tincture
Acute
Acute
Acute and
3 weeks
Acute
Acute
Acute
Acute and
repeated
Acute
Rodelim improved mental working capacity
in computer and correction tests against a
background of fatigue
Improved visual perception, short term
memory capacity, attention span and ability to
switch attention and anti-fatigue effect in the
psychometric tests
Improved mental performance determined by
a letter correction test
Improved night vision 50–70 min after
administration by some 1.5–2-fold for 7–8 h
Improved eye retina sensitivity to light under
dark conditions for 3.5 h in 90% of subjects
1.5 h after drug administration
Rhodiola rosea
,
E. senticosus
and
Rhaponticum cartamoides
increased working
capacity at maximal intensity for 30 s (sprint)
and duration of work of preset high-intensity
35 min after administration. The effects were
more significant under conditions of fatigue
Increased physical working capacity by up to
222%
cf.
with control. After repeated
administration
S. chinensis
did not increase
working capacity, but after a wash-out period,
the stimulating effect returned
Improved mental performance, reduced the
number of errors in Anfimov’s correction test:
the stimulating effect lasted 4 h or more
826 A. PANOSSIAN AND H. WAGNER
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Table 2. The difference between adaptogens and other stimulants
Stimulants Adaptogens
1. Recovery process after exhaustive physical load Low High
2. Energy depletion Yes No
3. Performance in stress Decrease Increase
4. Survival in stress Decrease Increase
5. Quality of arousal Bad Good
6. Insomnia Yes No
7. Side effects Yes No
8. DNA/RNA and protein synthesis Decrease Increase
et al., 1985; Wagner et al., 1994; Panossian et al., 1999c;
Panossian, 2003). Depending on the mediators of
the stress-system involved in the adaptogen-induced
stress-response, an immediate (single dose effect) or a
long term (after multiple administration) stimulating
effect may be observed. Whilst the efficacy of repeated
administration of adaptogens in improving mental per-
formance over various time periods is well documented
(Darbinyan et al., 2000; Spasov et al., 2000a, b), reports
on single dose effects are fragmentary and have yet
to be given comprehensive consideration. This article
reviews the results that have been recorded in human
subjects and, to a lesser extent, in laboratory animals
following single treatment with plant adaptogens.
STUDIES INVOLVING ANIMAL MODELS
It has been shown that small doses of an extract of
R. rosea, or of its active ingredient salidroside (1),
increases the spontaneous bio-electrical activity of
the brains of test animals, presumably by direct effects
on the ascending and descending reticular forma-
tion in the brainstem (Saratikov et al., 1965, 1978;
Marina, 1968; Marina and Alekseeva, 1968). Unlike
tranquillizers, however, medium range doses of the
adaptogen enhance the development of conditioned
avoidance reflexes in rats, and facilitate learning based
on positive reinforcement (Saratikov et al., 1965). In a
staircase experiment, involving a device consisting of
13 steps and four feeders, rats were starved for 23 h
and then trained to climb to the 12th step in order to
receive their food ration: one training session was
carried out with each animal for 5 successive days and
the criterion for learning was the number of trained
animals recorded on day 5 (Petkov et al., 1986). With
positive (food) reinforcement, a single administration
of an extract of R. rosea (0.1 mL per animal ) produced
a significant increase in the number of trained animals
(Fig. 1). In passive avoidance tests, however, no sig-
nificant differences were recorded between the control
animals and those treated with multiple administrations
for up to 10 days. The results obtained clearly depended
on the test methods employed and the differences noted
could indicate different neurochemical mechanisms
underlying the training methods.
In a maze test with negative (punitive) reinforcement,
significant enhancements in learning and retention were
detected in rats following the single dose application of
an extract of R. rosea at a rate of 0.1 mL per animal
(Petkov et al., 1986). The experiments were carried out
using a multi-chamber, semi-automatic maze: a quiet
Figure 1. The effect of an extract of
Rhodiola rosea
on learning
in rats using an active avoidance method with positive (food)
reinforcement. (Figure drawn from the data of Petkov
et al.
,
1986.)
buzzer was used as the conditional signal, followed by
punitive reinforcement in the form of a small electrical
current on the floor grid that was maintained until the
rat entered the goal-section of the maze. Training was
performed in one session until the test animal had found
its way to the goal-section in six successive attempts.
Retention parameters were considered to be the number
of correct responses (entry of the test animal into the
goal-section) and their latencies 24 h after training, and
these parameters improved significantly following treat-
ment with the plant adaptogen (Figs 2 and 3). Repeated
administration of the drug at the same dose level showed
similar effects.
Extracts of R. rosea have been reported to exhibit
interesting dose-dependent effects on the duration of
thiopental-induced sleep in mice (Fig. 4), ranging from
stimulation at low doses (10 mg/kg), where the sleep
period was reduced by 12.5 times, to sedation at high
doses (500 mg/kg), where the sleep period was increased
3-fold (Kurkin et al., 2003).
Ten days after oral administration of an aqueous
extract of R. rosea, the levels of norepinephrine (NE),
dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) in the brainstem
of the experimental animals increased considerably
compared with the levels in the same cerebral structure
in control animals. In the cerebral cortex, the levels of
NE and DA decreased significantly, whilst the 5-HT
level increased sharply. In contrast, in the hypothalamus
of rats treated with extracts of R. rosea, the formation
of NE and of DA increased about 3-fold compared
with the control group, whilst the 5-HT content de-
creased (Stancheva and Mosharrof, 1987). Treatment
with adaptogen also enhanced the effects of neuro-
transmitters on the brain by increasing the per-
meability of the blood–brain barrier to precursors
of DA and 5-HT. It has been suggested (Saratikov
et al., 1965, 1978; Marina, 1968; Marina and Alekseeva,
1968; Saratikov and Krasnov, 2004; Kurkin and
STIMULATING EFFECT OF ADAPTOGENS 827
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Figure 2. The effect of an extract of
Rhodiola rosea
on learning in rats in experiments involving active avoidance tasks with negative
(punitive) reinforcement. Maze training started 30 min after oral administration of
R. rosea
extract. Values shown are mean ± SEM.
(Figure drawn from the data of Petkov
et al.
, 1986.)
Figure 3. The effect of an extract of
Rhodiola rosea
on memory in rats in experiments involving active avoidance tasks with negative
(punitive) reinforcement. The memory test was applied 24 h after training and on 9 subsequent days following the first retention test:
maze training started 30 min after oral administration of preparation. Values shown are mean ± SEM. (Figure drawn from the data
of Petkov
et al.
, 1986.)
been demonstrated that 4 exhibited the largest stimu-
lating effect after a single oral administration (Figs 7–9;
Sokolov et al., 1990, Zapesochnaya et al., 1995) and
also showed the highest bioavailability (Zapesochnaya
et al., 1995). Moreover, whilst nearly all of the 27 pure
compounds isolated from R. sachalinensis (including 1
and 2) screened against propyl endoperoxidase (which
is known to play a role in the degradation of proline-
containing neuropeptides involved in the process of
learning and memory) showed inhibitory activity, the
most potent was 1,2,3,6-tetragogouyl-glucose (Fan et al.,
2001).
STUDIES INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS
The results of such studies are summarized in Table 1
in which the type and level of evidence gathered has
been classified according to the WHO, FDA and EMEA
systems. The most important effects reported were
increases in: (i) mental working capacity, (ii) physical
working capacity, (iii) the accuracy of movement, and
(iv) the visual functions of the eye.
Effect of adaptogens on mental working capacity
The effect of a single dose of an extract of R. rosea
on the mental performance of 85 healthy males and
females, in the age range 20–28 years old and working
under the same conditions, was studied by Zotova (1965)
using Anfimov’s table, which provides the possibility
of obtaining numerically comparable data characteriz-
ing the quality and quantity of work performed. The
subjects were asked to cross through letters A and C in
Figure 4. The effect of a single dose of
Rhodiola rosea
extract (administered 30 min before thiopental) on thiopental
(50 mg/kg, i.abd.) induced sleep in mice. The duration of sleep
was measured by the time that each animal remained laying
on its side. (Figure drawn from the data of Petkov
et al.
, 1986.)
Zapesochnaya, 1986) that treatment with extracts of R.
rosea promotes the release of NE, DA and 5-HT in the
ascending pathways of the brainstem thus activating
the cerebral cortex and the limbic system. Consequently,
the cognitive functions (thinking, analysing, evaluating,
calculating and planning) of the cerebral cortex, and
the attention, memory and learning functions of the
prefrontal and frontal cortex are enhanced.
Using animal models, bioassay-guided fractionation
of various extracts of plant adaptogens has shown
that the active principles are mainly phenylpropane
and phenylethane derivatives including salidroside (1),
rosavin (2), syringin (3), triandrin (4), tyrosol (5), etc
(Lebedev, 1951a, 1967; Aksenova, 1969; Aksenova et al.,
1968; Dardymov, 1976; Kurkin and Zapesochnaya,
1986; Nishibe et al., 1990; Zapesochnaya et al., 1995;
Saratikov and Krasnov, 2004). Of these, 1 was reported
to be the most active in a number of different test
systems (Figs 5 and 6; Barnaulov et al., 1986). How-
ever, in a more recent comparative study, it has
828 A. PANOSSIAN AND H. WAGNER
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Figure 5. (a) The stimulating effect of salidroside on mice kept continuously on poles until complete exhaustion; (b) The anti-hypnotic
effect of salidroside (s.c. injection at a dose of 100 mg/ kg) and of Rhodiola administered 1 h before the induction of sleep in mice
by Medinal. (Figure drawn from the data of Barnaulov
et al.
, 1986.)
Figure 6. The stimulating effects of compounds isolated from
roots of
Rhodiola rosea
. Preparations were administered six
times within 3 days to the test animals and their investigated
behaviour compared with that of a control group of rats. Sub-
jects were assessed using a ‘free field’ method involving count-
ing the number of oriented standing up activities and entries
into segments of an arena for 3 min. On day 4, the drug was
administered to the rats who were then subjected to an electri-
cal current (12 mA for 10 s), in order to decrease their uncondi-
tioned oriented reflex, and ‘free field’ counting was conducted
15 min after the electrotrauma. (Figure drawn from the data of
Barnaulov
et al.
, 1986.)
Figure 7. The effect on spontaneous movement activity in rats
after single dose administration of triandrin, rosavin and
syringin. (Figure drawn from the data of Sokolov
et al.
, 1990.)
Figure 9. The stimulating effect of triandrin, rosavin, syringin and cinnamoyl alcohol after single dose administration to sodium
barbital anaesthetized mice. (Figure drawn from the data of Sokolov
et al.
, 1990.)
Figure 8. The arousing effect of triandrin, rosavin and syringin after single dose administration to chloral-hydrate anaesthetized mice.
Values shown are mean ± SEM. (Figure drawn from the data of Sokolov
et al.
, 1990.)
a text within a fixed time of 5 min. Subjects were
grouped, and each group was treated separately with
different doses of R. rosea extract and finally with
placebo (coloured, 40% aqueous alcohol): in this
manner, any possible improvement in the results
occasioned by learning how to perform the test were
STIMULATING EFFECT OF ADAPTOGENS 829
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
eliminated. Each subject performed the task twice, once
before treatment with the extract/placebo and a second
time 1 h after the treatment. The results indicated that,
compared with treatment with the placebo, applica-
tion of R. rosea extract did not affect the quantity of
characters correctly crossed through, but considerably
reduced the number of errors made. Doses of 5–10
drops were found to be the most effective, reducing
the number of errors by an average of 46% (Fig. 10a).
At a dose of 5 drops, the treatment with the extract led
to a reduction in the number of errors in 88% of the
subjects tested, but to an increase in the remaining 12%.
Application of the placebo produced a reduction in the
number of errors in 35% of the subjects, an increase
in 58% and no change in the remaining 7% (Fig. 10b).
It was found that at a dose of 7 drops, the extract
exhibited a pronounced stimulating effect that lasted
some 4 h or longer (Zotova, 1965). In a complementary
study, the effect of salidroside (1) alone was shown to
be highly comparable to that of the extract of R. rosea
(Fig. 10) (Aksenova et al., 1968).
A similar study protocol was employed by Komar
et al. (1981) in order to compare the effects of pre-
parations of R. rosea and Eleutherococcus senticosus
on human mental activity. In this work, 254 men and
women were treated with an adaptogen extract or with
a tincture of Mentha as the control. The R. rosea ex-
tract was more active than that of E. senticosus in terms
of increasing working capacity (the difference in the
number of corrected symbols), efficacy (performance,
decreasing the number of errors) and speed of infor-
mation processing and perception. Unfortunately, it
was not stated if the trial was randomized and blind,
or if the differences between the results of the verum
and control groups were statistically significant. From
a separate series of tests conducted up to 8 h after
administration of the R. rosea extract, the same authors
claimed that the stimulating effect lasted for at least
4h, but again the statistical status of the significance of
these results remains unknown.
In another study involving text correction using
Anfimov’s tables and the ability to memorize paragraphs
of text, 82 volunteers were treated with either 5 drops
of extract of R. rosea or a dose (1, 5, 10 or 20 mg) of
pure tyrosol (5; an active component of R. rosea)
(Marina et al., 1994). The mental working capacities of
the subjects were evaluated after treatment, and it was
demonstrated that whilst neither preparation produced
an effect on the time taken to perform the correction
task, both improved the quality of performance, reduc-
ing the percentage of errors by 29%–35% compared
with the control, and increasing the volume of the
short-term memory as represented by the number
of text paragraphs recalled. The differences between
the results of groups taking different doses of 5 and
of the extract were not statistically significant (Marina
et al., 1994).
More recently, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled parallel group clinical study with an extra
non-treatment control group was performed (Shevtsov
et al., 2003) in order to measure the effect of a single
dose (2 or 3 capsules) of a standardized extract of
R. rosea (SHR-5; 180 mg per gelatine capsule) on the
capacity for mental (psychometric tests) work against a
background of fatigue and stress. The analysis, which
involved 161 cadets, demonstrated that both doses of
the extract produced statistically significant ( p < 0.001)
anti-fatigue (stimulating) effects, together with similarly
significant beneficial effects on pulse pressure, compared
with the placebo.
In 1988, Grigorenko and Berdyshev, reported that
a single daily dose of S. chinensis tea produced, for
at least the first 7–10 days of treatment, a tonic effect in
sailors who were keeping watch. After 2–3 weeks of
continuous use of the tea, some subjects developed
sleeplessness, excitability and a low level of general well-
being, although these negative side effects could be
eliminated by interludes with black tea. In an extension
to this work, a systematic placebo-controlled cross-over
study of various aspects of single dose administration
of both E. senticosus and S. chinensis on the mental
performance of 357 sailors on watch duty was performed
(Berdyshev, 1995). Subjects took different doses of the
preparations prior to their watch period and, 30–60 min
before such administration, a correction test was used
to evaluate mental performance. A similar correction
test was conducted immediately (30–60 min) after the
watch, and subjects were further tested before and
after watch duty every 4–5 days in order to exclude a
possible cumulative effect of the treatment.
Single doses of between 0.25 and 8 mL of E. senticosus
extract were administered to sailors before the watch,
and a dose of 4 ml was found to be the most effective
in improving working ability. Doses up to 1 mL did not
have the desired effect on most of the subjects, whilst
doses larger than 4 mL did not improve the results in
the test group. At a dose of 8 mL, only 49% of subjects
showed a positive effect and, moreover, the subjective
condition and several objective parameters of some
subjects in this group (11 out of 62) became worse, i.e.
for a short period (20–40 min) the subjects felt sleepy
and flabby, whilst the indirect parameters associated
with their working ability and blood pressure decreased.
In order to study the daily dynamics of the effect of
a single 4 mL dose of E. senticosus extract, additional
studies were carried out involving 72 of the original
sailors carrying out similar tasks inside the ship whilst
on different watches. The considerable differences
revealed in the efficacy of E. senticosus were found to
be related to the individual typological features of the
subject, including daily and seasonal biorhythms. In the
morning, positive effects on working ability occasioned
by the adaptogen were most pronounced in subjects
presenting the morning type of biorhythmic activity
(83% of the subjects) compared with only 39% of
the subjects exhibiting the evening type of activity. In
Figure 10. The effect of a single dose of
Rhodiola rosea
extract
(10 drops) and salidroside (2.5 mg) on the mental performances
of 46 healthy subjects as measured by a text correction test
applied 1 h after administration in comparison with a control
test applied 1 h before administration. (Figure drawn from the
data of Aksenova
et al.
, 1968.)
830 A. PANOSSIAN AND H. WAGNER
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
the evening, the results were quite different in that the
adaptogen showed much better results in subjects with
the evening type of biorhythmic activity. At night, when
the overall effect of the preparation was relatively
low, the correlation with biorhythmic type practically
disappeared.
In order to determine if the efficacy of the extract of
E. senticosus was associated with the functional state
of the organism, a correlation analysis was carried out
on the same group of sailors with respect to the initial
(before work) values of various biochemical parameters
(Table 3). For sailors working on all watches, positive
relationships between the efficacy of the adaptogen
and the activity of the adrenal cortex (excretion of
17-ketosteroids in the urine), the activity of the sympa-
thetic adrenomedullar system (orthostatic test), the
intensity of metabolic processes (excretion of vitamin
C in the urine) and the intensity of oxidation-reduction
processes (Rotter test) could be demonstrated. In con-
trast, the activity of the parasympathetic nervous system
(clinostatic test), non-specific resistance (percentage
phagocytosis, phagocytic index, vascular resistance, and
osmotic resistance of erythrocytes) and the endurance
to hypoxia (Hench test with retention of breathing
at exhalation) all showed negative correlations with
efficacy of the drug.
In a similar, comparative analysis (Berdyshev, 1995),
44 sailors (whose duties involved hard work under
severe winter conditions) were administered placebo,
4mL of E. senticosus extract, or 3 mL of S. chinensis
tincture, each on a separate test day, and then exam-
ined before and after completing their watches. Using
a paired correlation method, the relationship between
the effect of the adaptogens (determined individually
according to the working ability of the subject) and
the differences in functional changes during the watch
(compared with the placebo values for that subject)
were calculated for each sailor (Table 4). On the basis
Table 3. The values of the correlation coefficients associated with comparisons of effects of
Eleutherococcus senticosus extract (4 mL) and initial levels of functional parameters in sailors
during watches in middle altitudes
Correlation coefficient
Parameter Morning (8:00) Evening (20:00) Night (4:00)
Excretion of 17-ketosteroids in urine 0.57 0.31 0.22
Eosinophils of the blood −0.22 −0.35 −0.26
Orthostatic test 0.59 0.63 0.31
Clinostatic test −0.68 −0.52 −0.36
Vitamin C excretion in urine 0.62 0.37 0.17
Rotter test −0.55 −0.4 −0.21
Hench test −0.48 −0.25 −0.12
Phagocytosis percentage −0.41 −0.34 −0.23
Phagocytic index −0.55 −0.43 −0.28
Vascular resistance −0.53 −0.36 −0.32
Osmotic resistance of erythrocytes −0.66 −0.42 −0.2
Table 4. The values of correlation index between the effects of Eleutherococcus senticosus and
Schizandra chinensis extracts and changes in functional parameters during a day watch under
unfavourable conditions
Index of pair correlation
Eleutherococcus Schizandra
Parameter
senticosus chinensis
Excretion of 17-ketosteroids in urine −0.55 0.21
Eosinophils of the blood 0.42 −0.16
Energy metabolism 0.34 0.83
Rotter test −0.33 −0.59
Respiration coefficient 0.15 0.5
Tonus of the sympathetic adrenomedullar system −0.27 0.78
Tonus of the parasympathetic nervous system 0.69 −0.21
Vitamin C excretion in urine −0.22 0.4
Total nitrogen excretion in urine −0.3 0.38
Breathing retention at exhalation 0.58 −0.35
Phagocytosis percentage 0.41 −0.24
Phagocytic index 0.53 −0.16
Vascular resistance 0.39 −0.4
Osmotic erythrocyte resistance 0.45 −0.27
CNS excitation 0.21 0.69
Excitation/inhibition balance in the CNS 0.48 −0.17
Heart rate −0.36 0.49
Systolic blood pressure 0.18 0.45
Coefficient of the cardiovascular system endurance −0.46 −0.29
Body temperature −0.3 0.37
STIMULATING EFFECT OF ADAPTOGENS 831
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
of these results, the author suggested that in subjects
working under stress the effect of a single dose of
E. senticosus was occasioned by a pronounced increase
in the tonus of the parasympathetic part of the auto-
nomic nervous system, a moderate intensification of
excitation of the CNS and of energy metabolism with
practically unchanged respiratory coefficient, a tendency
towards the intensification of oxidation-reduction pro-
cesses in tissues, improvement of cortical processes and
balance, and in cardiovascular system activity thanks to
slower pulse and increased pulse pressure, a decrease
in adrenal cortex activity, catabolic processes, and
the tonus of the sympathetic part of the autonomic
nervous system, and a reduction in the increase of body
temperature. It was concluded that the increase in work-
ing ability following treatment with the adaptogen
was associated with improved endurance to hypoxia
and improvement in the parameters of non-specific
resistance of the subject. Furthermore, treatment with
an extract of E. senticosus was claimed to reduce exces-
sive exertion of the organism by virtue of its effect on
adrenal function and tonus of the autonomic nervous
system.
On the other hand, the results of the correlation
analysis suggested that the increase in work capacity
induced by a single dose of S. chinensis was brought
about by a quite different mechanism. Thus, improve-
ment in mental performance correlated positively with
increased energy metabolism and catabolic processes,
increased tonus of the CNS, and intensified activities of
the sympathetic adrenomedullar, the adrenal and the
cardiovascular systems. This, in turn, coincided with an
increase in body temperature, a lowered endurance to
hypoxia, and a decrease in some parameters of non-
specific resistance of the subject. These facts indicate
that the effects of this adaptogen are associated with
the additional mobilization of energy resources, i.e.
S. chinensis is, evidently, a mild stimulant.
The differences in the effects produced by E.
senticosus and by S. chinensis on working ability and
function of subjects at night time can be explained
in terms of the differences in mechanism of action
of the two drugs. Table 5 shows the levels of various
functional parameters determined in groups of sailors
after performing their duties under conditions of
high temperature and humidity between the hours of
midnight and 4 a.m. (Berdyshev, 1995). The subjects
were administered either a placebo or one of the test
drugs directly before their watch, and were examined
immediately after having performed their duty (between
4 and 5 a.m). The results show that, in contrast to E.
senticosus, treatment with S. chinensis stimulated the
activity of the CNS at night (activated excitation proc-
esses and normalized nervous processes ratio), increased
tonus of the sympathetic part of the autonomic nerv-
ous system (having no effect on the parasympathetic
part), activated the adrenal cortex activity, increased
the activity of the cardiovascular and respiratory sys-
tems, intensified oxidation-reduction and metabolic
processes, improved working ability parameters and, at
the same time, reduced parameters of non-specific re-
sistance the organism and cellular structure resistance
and increased body temperature (Berdyshev, 1995).
Differences in the stimulating effects of various
adaptogens following single administration were demon-
strated by Medvedev (1963) in a study involving radio
operators. It was shown that, compared with placebo,
an extract of E. senticosus significantly decreased the
number of errors in messages transmitted by tired
operators. The stimulating effect of E. senticosus
was strong and stable whilst that produced by Panax
ginseng was insignificant (Fig. 11).
A series of in-depth studies have been carried out
at the Centre for Space Medicine of the Institute of
Medicinal and Biological Problems (IMBD) and at the
Moscow Aviation Institute (Bogatova and Malozemov,
1994; Bogatova et al., 1997) in order to evaluate the
effect of a fixed and standardized combination of
extracts of S. chinensis, E. senticosus and R. rosea
[ADAPT-232; capsules containing 3 mg of salidroside
(1), 4 mg of schizandrin (6) and 3 mg eleutheroside B
(7)]. The consequence on short-term memory, power
Table 5. Effects of extracts of Eleutherococcus senticosus and Schizandra chinensis on functional parameters in sailors during night
watches in middle latitudes
After a night watch (4:00)
Eleutherococcus Schizandra
Parameter Control
senticosus chinensis
Time of a simple sensorimotor response (ms) 230 ± 1.0 226 ± 1.4 212 ± 2.3a
Endurance to static effort (s) 24.9 ± 0.5 25.6 ± 0.6 27.8 ± 0.6a
Hench test (s) 26.8 ± 0.5 28.9 ± 0.4 26.5 ± 0.6a
Body temperature (°C) 36.30 ± 0.01 36.30 ± 0.01 36.60 ± 0.02a
Heart rate (bpm) 66.2 ± 0.8 68.4 ± 0.9 72.8 ± 1.1a
Systolic pressure (mm Hg) 100 ± 0.8 104 ± 1.3 108 ± 1.3a
Diastolic pressure (mm Hg) 60.5 ± 0.7 62.0 ± 0.9 70.0 ± 1.1a
Orthostatic test (bpm) 13.1 ± 0.6 14.1 ± 0.8 18.2 ± 0.9a
Clinostatic test (bpm) 16.5 ± 1.0 16.4 ± 1.1 16.2 ± 0.8
Respiration rate (breath/min) 12.4 ± 0.7 13.2 ± 0.6 15.6 ± 0.7a
Diuresis (mL/h) 32.0 ± 2.0 33.5 ± 2.3 41.5 ± 2.5a
Vitamin C excretion in urine (mg/h) 0.41 ± 0.02 0.43 ± 0.02 0.62 ± 0.02a
Excretion of 17-ketosteroids in urine 0.59 ± 0.01 0.52 ± 0.02 0.75 ± 0.03a
Phagocytosis percentage 60 ± 2.4 71 ± 2.8 53 ± 2.4a
Phagocytic index 13 ± 0.57 19 ± 0.62 12 ± 0.55a
Rotter test (min) 14.1 ± 1.3 13.6 ± 0.9 10.5 ± 0.7a
a
p
< 0.05
832 A. PANOSSIAN AND H. WAGNER
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
of comprehension, and oculomotor coordination in
five Russian cosmonauts treated with a single dose of
ADAPT-232 during their training in prolonged isola-
tion (90 days) under conditions of long-term, monoto-
nous work was evaluated in a placebo-controlled pilot
study. Computer-generated psychometric tests were
carried out at various times after treatment of the sub-
jects and the results demonstrated that, within 4 h of
application, ADAPT-232 significantly decreased the
number of mistakes in complicated psychometric tests
but had no significant effect in non-complicated tests.
In a follow-up study, 60 volunteers, selected from
a population of 97 on the basis of high results (≥7.5
out of 10) in a psychometric test, were divided into
six equal groups and each group was tested against
itself after taking ADAPT-232 (3 capsules once a day)
or placebo according to a cross-over design with a
wash-out period of 3 days. The study consisted of three
sections: (i) examination of mental performance during
24 h continuous work after a single-dose treatment,
(ii) examination of the mental and physical (mainly
cardiovascular) work capacity against a background of
fatigue or/and stress during repeated-dose treatment,
and (iii) assessment of the well-being of treated sub-
jects as determined from their subjective view of the
level of difficulty of the tests applied. The main aim of
the study was to determine the effect of adaptogens
during monotonous and long-term work under con-
ditions that simulated the environment on the space
stations SaIjut and Mir. For this purpose a highly
sophisticated computer-based test (Monotonic 2) was
employed, which consisted of a well-tried and validated
battery of assessments measuring mental performance
during space-like conditions.
Monotonic 2 was developed and refined over a
period of 20 years and has proven to be much more
reliable than standard tests with pencil and paper.
The most important parameters assessed are speed,
reliability and the ability to comprehend, learn and
reproduce new information with high precision during
monotonous and long working shifts. In order to study
the dynamics of a single dose effect, as well as the on-
set of an effect, each subject performed 18 h of mono-
tonous work and then had to respond to the computer
program continuously during the test (which started at
2 a.m.). Scores representing (i) speed and reliability in
the understanding of information (t), and (ii) precision
and accuracy in the ability to reproduce the informa-
tion (h), were recorded every 30 min for each subject.
The lower the value of t, the higher the speed; the
higher the value of h, the higher the precision: taken
together, the values of t and h also provided an indica-
tor of the level of tiredness and concentration in
repeated tests. The results of the Monotonic 2 test con-
cerning mental work capacity are shown in Fig. 12 in
which the mean data for each group are displayed.
Regarding the on-set of the effect, the tests revealed a
significant increase in performance after 1–2 h. With
respect to the parameters of speed and precision, an
increase in mental work capacity after intake of
ADAPT-232 is clearly seen in Fig. 12 from the dif-
ference in area between the two curves.
An alternative fixed and standardized combination
of extracts of S. chinensis, E. senticosus and R. rosea
(Rodelim) has also been shown to increase significantly
the mental working capacity of healthy volunteers when
applied in repeated or single-dose format (Vezirishvili
et al., 1999; Roslyakova et al., 2000). The assessment
was based on a study of the psycho-emotional and
psycho-physiological states, the professional and mental
working capacity, and the cardiovascular system of 60
computer operators on night duty under conditions that
simulated long monotonous activity inducing fatigue.
The methods of evaluation included mathematical ana-
lysis of the cardiac rhythm, computer tests, question-
naires and psycho-physiological tests, ophthalmologic
examinations and medical tests (heart rate, ECG and
respiration parameters, blood pressure, etc).
The effects of powdered seeds of S. chinensis on the
mental working capacity of 59 students was studied
(Lebedev, 1951a, b; Kochmareva, 1958) using a method
of text correction in which fatigue decreased the
accuracy but not the speed of work. Following treat-
ment, the performance of 38 subjects (65%) improved,
17 showing an increase in the number and quality of
corrections made, 14 demonstrating an improvement
only in quality of correction, and 7 an increase only in
Figure 11. The effects of extracts of
Eleutherococcus
senticosus
and
Panax ginseng
on the mental performance of radio opera-
tors assessed 1 h after drug uptake. (Figure drawn from the
data of Medvedev, 1963.)
Figure 12. The dynamics of object-stimulus fixation: measurements of speed and precision were assessed 30 min after intake of
ADAPT-232 and for the following 4.5 h. (Figure reproduced from Bogatova
et al.
, 1994 with permission.)
STIMULATING EFFECT OF ADAPTOGENS 833
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
the amount of work performed. Six constituents were
isolated from the seeds of S. chinensis and the tests
repeated on 20 subjects, every one of whom received
each of the compounds individually. Schizandrin (6)
was found to be the most active substance present
in the seed material. A dose of 3.6 mg of 6 prevented
exhaustion-related errors in text correction by the sub-
jects: errors of the control group (treated with placebo)
amounted to 228% whilst those of the treated group
were only 95% (errors in the control test normalized to
100%) (Lebedev, 1951a, b, 1967).
In another study, involving telegraph operators
between the ages of 21 and 24 years, the same author
showed that single doses of either an extract of S.
chinensis (30 mL; 10% in 70% aqueous ethanol) or of
compound 6 (5, 10 and 20 mg) prevented exhaustion-
related errors in transmitting Morse code at maximum
speed for 5 min (Lebedev, 1967). In this duplicated
set of experiments (n1 = 20, n2 = 23) the frequency of
errors made by the control groups (given glucose or
70% aqueous ethanol as placebo) was 130%, whilst the
error frequency of the treated groups was 84%–103%
(errors in the control test normalized to 100%). Similar
results were obtained following treatment of the opera-
tors with P. ginseng or with phenamine: however, the
latter produced an effect of excitation that increased
speed but not performance.
Along with the demonstration that adaptogens
could improve mental capacity of healthy subjects, a
number of Russian researchers conceived the idea that
they could be used for the treatment of some neurotic
conditions. Kaliko and Tarasova (1966) studied the
effects of extracts of R. rosea and Rhaponticum carta-
moides on 80 healthy students and 70 neurotic patients
employing the so-called Ivanov-Smolenski verbal ex-
periment with speech-supported locomotor-conditioned
reflex measurement. In this test, 25 words conveying
exciting images were located in sequence with words
requiring a reflective oral response from the subject.
Excitation was assessed by the speed of formation, sta-
bility and intensity of reflex movements, whilst calming
effects were determined from the latent period between
a questioning word and the response, and also from the
character of the response. The verbal experiment was
performed twice (using a different set of 25 words on
each occasion) with each participant, once before drug
administration and once following a single or repeated
dose of the extract. It was found that, in single dose
form, neither extract induced an effect on the function-
ing of the CNS in healthy subjects. However, in patients
with neurosis, a single dose of Rhodiola rosea extract
brought about significant changes in the functional state
of the CNS as characterized by normalization of the
speed and the power of neural processes. The latent
period of speech reflex decreased to between 1 and 3 s
(1.6 s was accepted as the normal latent period of speech
response), and stereotype answers and refusals dis-
appeared. Conditioned reflexes were formed at the first
associations, their latent period decreased, the size of the
reflexes increased, generalized reactions disappeared,
transformation of positive-conditioned irritants into
negative ones arose after the first associations, the
memory improved, and passive and (particularly)
active attention became more stable. Repeat testing
3 days after single dose administration showed that
the described improvement in functioning of the CNS
was only temporary (Kaliko and Tarasova, 1966). How-
ever, a more stable effect was achieved by multiple
administration of extracts of R. rosea and Rhaponticum
cartamoides over a 10 day period.
Effect of adaptogens on physical working capacity
Not only can the administration of plant adaptogens
improve mental performance, it can also stimulate
the brain cortex and thus increase physical capacity as
well. The working capacity and physical force of men
using the Dubua ergographic test was increased by 24%–
42% (cf control) after 1–3 h following administration
of a single dose of a 70% ethanol extract of the seeds
of S. chinensis (Karo, 1945; Lazarev, 1946): aqueous
extracts of seeds and extracts of berries, however,
showed no such activity. Following treatment with
capsules containing the powdered seeds of S. chinensis,
the stimulatory effect was observable within 2–2.5 h,
reached a maximum at 3.5 h and had disappeared
after 5.5 h (Kokhanova et al., 1950). Subjects who had
been fatigued by sawing wood for 5 min (at a frequency
of 45 saw movements/min) prior to treatment with S.
chinensis exhibited a more pronounced enhancement
of their working capacity (as measured by the Dubua
test), which increased from 27.5 kg/m in the control
group to 77 kg/m in the treated group.
Studies carried out using the classical ergometric bi-
cycle (60 kg load), in which the number of revolutions
completed by the subject was counted up to the point
of exhaustion, revealed an even greater stimulatory
effect of S. chinensis. Yefimova et al. (1954) reported
that healthy subjects showed a more than 2-fold
increase in working capacity following administration
of a single dose of seed powder, whilst students tested
using similar methods exhibited an increase in working
capacity from 620 kg/m (mean control value for placebo
group) to 1736 kg/m. The classical ergographic proce-
dure was also used by Andrejev and Georgijev (1958)
who observed a 49.2% increase in the working capacity
of healthy subjects.
In athletes and rowers, a 20% tincture of S. chinensis
seed, administered in doses of 2, 5, 10 or 15 g and
applied 1, 2 or 3 h before physical exercise, improved
the function of the respiratory and cardio-vascular
systems, increased muscle power of the hand muscles,
and reduced the time required by the athletes to com-
plete the course (Eglit et al., 1965): the improvements
appeared to be particularly significant for groups
of canoeists treated with the tincture 1 h before single-
handed races.
Powdered seed material of S. chinensis supplied in
capsule form to Red Army soldiers before they under-
took a 20 km ski run, reduced exhaustion and shortage
of breath, the feeling of thirst and dryness of the mouth,
and muscular pain compared with a control group who
had been given a placebo capsule (Murtazin, 1946). The
treated soldiers were able to complete the run in a
shorter time than the control group, and similar sets of
results were recorded for treated and control groups of
civilian skiers tested under the same conditions.
Results recorded for runners treated with pre-
parations of S. chinensis appear a little more complex,
however. Application of a tincture of S. chinensis pro-
duced a negative effect on the times taken for runners
834 A. PANOSSIAN AND H. WAGNER
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
to complete a 100 m course, but when the same sub-
jects were required to complete the longer distance of
1000 m, some 60% of the runners showed significantly
improved times, and the overall average improvement
for all runners was 4.45 s (Astanin et al., 1943). After
receiving ethanol or caffeine, the times taken by these
runners to complete 1000 m were longer than those
recorded in preliminary runs (before which they had
received no treatment), and considerably longer than
the times recorded after receiving S. chinensis or am-
phetamine. In corroboration of these positive responses,
Lebedev (1967, 1971) reported that schizandrin (6: an
active component of S. chinensis) increased the work-
ing capacities of 20-year-old runners performing over a
distance of 3000 m such that their running times were
remarkably shorter than those of a control group that
had been treated with placebo (glucose). In all doses
tested, the stimulating effect of 6 was of the same order
of magnitude as that of phenamine.
A very detailed report is available concerning the
effects of E. senticosus on the activity of the cardio-
vascular system and the capacity for work of skiers. In
this study (Dalinger, 1966), groups of sportsmen took
part in one of a number of different events, i.e. ski
races of 20, 30 or 40 km, or a biathlon (a 20 km ski run
carrying a rifle and involving target shooting at various
locations during the race), or a 6-day ski hike over
150 km whilst carrying kit: each event was held under
severe conditions (air temperature of −28 to −23 °C with
a strong wind). Within each group, half were given an
alcohol extract of E. senticosus and the other half an
infusion of tea with a small amount of alcohol: both
preparations looked and tasted the same, and the skiers
did not know which they had been given. Before com-
mencing the competition, subjects underwent several
tests including a combined Letunov’s functional test,
oxyhemography with a functional test in the form of a
dosed delay of respiration for 50 s and a test with a
maximum delay of respiration (Stange’s test), whilst
the muscular tonus of the biceps and triceps brachia,
and the quadrate muscle of the thigh and the gastro-
cnemius was measured by means of a myotonometer
(Searman’s system). The tests were repeated immedi-
ately after completion of the event, during the first
30 min and during the recovery period, and 6 h, 1 and
2 days later. The short-distance skiers were given their
preparation in the form of a single dose (4 mL) some
90, 60 or 45 min before the start of the event: the long-
distance skiers were given daily doses (2 mL each) of
preparation, the first administration being 6 h after start-
ing the event, with a final dose (4 mL) on the last day
of the hike.
Generally, those subjects who had received extract
of E. senticosus showed an increase in the capacity for
work (with easier breathing on the track), undertook
the ascents with greater energy, did not feel fatigue
after the extended work, noted a pronounced feeling
of muscular vigour, slept well, enjoyed a good appetite,
and were happy to return to training after completion of
the event. The athletes who had received the placebo
showed no such positive changes. The Letunov’s func-
tional test indicated that, in most cases, increases in
pulse rate and arterial pressure were less pronounced
in treated skiers in comparison with the appropriate
control group, and the elevated levels returned to
normal sooner (within 30–40 min rather than 80 min as
recorded for the control group). When subjected to
Stange’s test (at sub-maximal respiration) 30 min after
the event, athletes treated with E. senticosus presented
an average value of 110.8 s whilst the average value for
those given placebo was 103.9 s, indicating a higher
functional status of the cardio-vascular and nervous
system in the treated group. The oxyhemographic study
indicated that the adaptogen increased the athletes’
steadiness and resistance to hypoxemia. The results
of the delayed breathing test in combination with
oxyhemography, indicated an increase in resistance to
oxygen insufficiency in skiers who had taken the E.
senticosus extract, together with a more rapid restora-
tion of blood oxygenation after dosed delayed respira-
tion and after maximum delay of breathing.
An indication of the powerful restoring effect of the
adaptogen was demonstrated by its influence on mus-
cular tonus. After taking the preparation, skiers found
that it became easier to perform heavy muscular work
and the residual muscular tonus was less pronounced.
After 24 h there were practically no manifestations
of residual tonus in the treated skiers, whereas in the
athletes of the control group the residual tonus was still
somewhat pronounced. The decrease of the residual
tonus below initial values suggests that extracts of E.
senticosus stimulate a more active recovery following
heavy physical loading (Dalinger, 1966).
No difference was observed between the control and
the treated groups with respect to the average time
taken to cover the distance in the 20 km race but, of
the expert skiers who took part in the 30 km race, those
treated with E. senticosus extract produced significantly
faster times than members of the placebo group. In the
biathlon, the treated group scored a significantly higher
number of target hits in the shooting event compared
with the control group (14 vs 10, respectively). Within
the groups who had participated in the 6-day hike, those
receiving the verum claimed that they had not felt any
fatigue but had experienced a rapid restoration of
strength shortly after taking the preparation. The
restoration of pulse and arterial pressure to the initial
levels proceeded twice as rapidly (towards the end of
the first 24 h) in the treated group compared with the
control group (delayed typically to the third day).
Tuzov (1968) conducted a placebo-controlled,
randomized, single blind comparative study of the
effects of E. senticosus, Rhodiola rosea, Rhaponticum
cartamoides and Panax ginseng on the muscular work-
ing capacities of 52 healthy athletes (aged between 18
and 24 years) who were exposed to various physical
loads. Experiments were performed either in the
absence or presence of background fatigue, and the
amount and intensity of work performed was evalu-
ated. In the first set of experiments the study drug or
the placebo solution was administered to a subject who
then rested for 30 min before operating the bicycle in
sprint mode (maximum race speed) for 30 s. After a
5min rest the subject repeated the task, during which
time the resistance to rotation of the wheels was ad-
justed to suit the functional abilities of the athlete. The
aim of this procedure was to ensure that each subject
would be able to carry out continuous work at the
highest load intensity for a duration of 20–30 min
before exhaustion set in. The exact time taken for
each subject to reach exhaustion after working at their
appropriately chosen pace was recorded, together with
STIMULATING EFFECT OF ADAPTOGENS 835
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
the determined amount and intensity of work performed
during that period.
In a second series of experiments in which the sub-
jects were in a state of fatigue before measurements
were made, the drug or placebo was administered and,
rather than resting for 30 min, athletes were asked to
carry out standard dosed work for 25 min followed by
a 5 min rest before the prescribed 30 s sprints and timed
exercise began. Tests were repeated at intervals of 2–3
days, and on each occasion the subjects received 15
drops of Rhodiola rosea extract, or 2 mL of an extract
of E. senticosus, Rhaponticum cartamoides or P. ginseng,
or an equivalent volume of placebo with similar organ-
oleptic properties. The subjects had no knowledge of
the nature of the drug administered on any particular
occasion: in fact, application of adaptogens commenced
only after a period of adaptation to physical load when
the subject had got used to working on the training
equipment and the values of the intensity of muscular
work became relatively uniform. The results showed
that the efficacy of the drug depended on the duration
of the physical loading and the background fatigue of
the subject. Thus, in the absence of prior fatigue,
adaptogens showed no effect on the intensity of the
sprint work. However, when the subjects were pre-
fatigued, the maximum intensity of the sprint was
increased moderately (9% vs placebo) but significantly
(p < 0.05) by application of the extract of Rhodiola
rosea but not by the other extracts (Fig. 13a). In
contrast, under physical loading using a preset high-
intensity test, all studied adaptogens showed statistically
significant stimulating effects (Fig. 13b) except for that
derived from P. ginseng. The best results were obtained
with the extract of R. rosea that, on pre-fatigued
subjects, gave rise to a prolongation of work by about
28% compared with the placebo (Tuzov, 1968). With
pre-fatigued athletes, improvements in the general state
and functional indices, as well as a reduction in the
recovery period, were observed in all subjects taking
herbal stimulants. Furthermore, an improvement in the
response of the blood circulation system to physical
load, presumably caused by an increase in the stroke
volume, was also observed in all athletes who had been
given the herbal stimulants. The largest improvements
in pulse rate and the highest blood pressure values
were observed in subjects who had been treated with
Rhodiola rosea. The adaptogens also showed a positive
effect on the muscular force of the back and of the hand
muscles as determined by spirometry (Tuzov, 1968).
In a recent double-blind placebo-controlled random-
ized study of the effects of acute and 4-week intake
of a standardized extract of R. rosea on the physical
capacity, muscular strength, speed of limb movement,
reaction time and attention in young volunteers, it was
demonstrated that treatment improved endurance in
exercise performance (De Bock et al., 2004). Compared
with the placebo group, acute intake of R. rosea extract
increased the time to exhaustion slightly but signific-
antly; however, daily intake of the drug for 4 weeks
produced no significant difference compared with
placebo treatment. These results contrast with several
other studies in which significant effects on mental and
physical performance following repeated administration
of R. rosea extract have been observed (Darbinyan
et al., 2000; Spasov et al., 2000a, b).
Very recently, a study involving a commercial, herbal-
based formula containing root of R. rosea appeared to
demonstrate that the preparation did not elicit positive
changes in cycling performance (Earnest et al., 2004).
The discrepancy of the results from this study com-
pared with the numerous other studies require explana-
tion. It might simply be that the batch of the drug
employed was not analysed prior to the experiment in
order to ensure compliance with specification. As an
example of the necessity of such control, it should be
mentioned that in a systematic study of 25 commercial
samples of Ginseng and Eleutherococcus obtained from
a local health food store, the concentrations of active
ingredients varied by 15- and 400-fold (Harkey et al.,
2001).
Effect of adaptogens on the visual functions of eye
Increases in the peripheral sensitivity of the retina have
been reported (Galochkina, 1948) after administration
of a single dose of the air-dried powder of fruits of S.
chinensis (mixed with starch and glucose) followed by
50–60 min of adaptation to darkness. This treatment
also increased sensitivity to red light (600 nm) but de-
creased sensitivity to green light (520 nm), an outcome
that is possibly associated with a parasympathomimetic
effect of the drug.
In a related placebo-controlled study involving
healthy subjects (Trusov, 1953), the single administra-
tion of capsules containing 3 g of S. chinensis seed
powder was shown to enhance night vision and to
accelerate adaptation to darkness. For each individual,
Figure 13. The effect of stimulants on (a) the working capacity at maximal intensity for 30 s (sprint) determined 30 min after
administration, and (b) the duration of work at a preset high intensity determined 35 min after administration. (Figure drawn from
the data of Tuzov, 1968.)
836 A. PANOSSIAN AND H. WAGNER
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
sensitivity to light and acuity of vision, and visual field
margins of colours were measured, respectively, 1.5 and
3h after drug administration, and the results compared
with those obtained in an initial evaluation of visual
function carried out 10–15 min before treatment. It was
clearly demonstrated that S. chinensis increased visual
acuity under low illumination and extended the visual
field margins for white and red light by 8° to 25°. A
later extension of this work (Trusov, 1958a, b) employed
two further scales for the measurement of visual sensit-
ivity, namely, the time taken to recognize an object
in darkness, and the maximum level of darkness that
permitted such object recognition (an evaluation of
adaptation to darkness). Ninety percent of healthy sub-
jects who received a single dose (3 g) of S. chinensis
seed powder showed significantly increased visual sensit-
ivity. Some 4.5 h after application of the adaptogen,
the time required for visual recognition of an object in
darkness had decreased from 32.3 to 18.4 s and adapta-
tion to darkness had improved markedly.
Since S. chinensis increased the rate of increase of
visual sensitivity, but not the final level of sensitivity, it
was concluded that the adaptogen affects the neural
mechanisms of adaptation to darkness rather than
the photochemical processes in the retina of the eye
(Trusov, 1958a, b). This same study also provided
some indication of the mode of action of S. chinensis,
since pharmacological agents that mainly affect the brain
cortex are known to induce equal changes in visual
sensitivity in all regions of the visible spectrum, whilst
agents that act on the vegetative nervous system and/or
the hypothalamus–pituitary system have opposite effects
on red and green vision.
STRUCTURE–ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP
It appears that plant adaptogens that exhibit a stimu-
lating single dose effect, namely, R. rosea, S. chinensis
and E. senticosus, all contain relatively high amounts
of phenolic compounds, particularly phenylpropane or
phenylethane derivatives. These compounds are struc-
turally related to the catecholamines, and presumably
play important roles in the SAS and CNS systems.
In contrast, plants such P. ginseng, Bryonia alba, E.
senticosus etc, which contain relatively large amounts
of tetracyclic triterpenes that are structurally similar to
corticosteroids, reveal their stress protective effects and
adaptation to stressors after repeated administration
for periods of 1–4 weeks. In these cases, the active
components play key roles in the HPA axis-mediated
regulation of the immune and neuroendocrine systems.
It is worth noting that, along with the common
feature associated with all plant adaptogens, namely,
induction of a state of non-specific resistance in stress,
these drugs exhibit various specific effects under dif-
ferent conditions. For example, it seems that the most
important effects of R. rosea extract relate to improve-
ments in mental performance, memory and learning.
On the other hand, the extract of S. chinensis shows
a hepatoprotective effect, produces an improvement
in eye vision in darkness, increases stamina, physical
performance and working capacity, particularly in tired-
ness, and is recommended for treatment of patients
presenting asternic- and astheno-depressive states.
E. senticosus exhibits a pronounced adaptogenic effect,
increasing the non-specific resistance of the organism
to viral and bacterial infections and to other harmful
stressors (radiation, cold, noise, negative emotions,
and physical load). Furthermore, a dry extract of this
adaptogen, taken at a rate of 300 mg/day for 8 weeks,
increases the quality of life of elderly patients (Cicero
et al., 2004). Chisan®, a fixed combination of all three
of these plant adaptogens, has also been shown to
increase the quality of life of patients with pneumonia
when taken daily during the illness (Narimanyan et al.,
2005). In a similar manner, P. ginseng significantly
increased the quality of life in 338 patients each taking
one capsule per day for 12 weeks compared with a
control group of 163 patients (Caso Marasco et al., 1996).
CONCLUSIONS
Only three of the known plant adaptogens, namely
R. rosea, S. chinensis and E. senticosus, exhibit a harm-
less, ‘adaptogen-type’ stimulating effect on humans
leading to improvements in mental performance and
learning efficacy after single dose administration: the
most active stimulant is that derived from R. rosea. The
stimulating effects of these drugs are apparent within
30 min after administration and last for at least 4 – 6 h.
The active principles associated with the single dose
stimulating effect of the three plant adaptogens are
phenylpropane and phenylethane phenolic glycosides,
in particular, salidroside (1), rosavin (2), syringin (3)
and triandrin (4), the latter showing the strongest
activity.
REFERENCES
Aksyonova RA. 1969.
Pharmacology of Rhodioloside.
PhD Thesis
in Pharmacology. Tomsk State University, Tomsk, 1–14.
Aksenova RA, Zotova MI, Nekhoda MF, Cherdintsev SG.
1968. Comparative characteristics of the stimulating and
adaptogenic effects of
Rhodiola rosea
preparations. In
Stimulants of the Central Nervous System
, Saratikov AS
(ed.). Vol. 2. Tomsk University Press: Tomsk, 3–12.
Andrejev I, Georgijev V. 1958. Ergographic study of
Schizandra
chinensis
stimulating effect. In
The Study of Ginseng and
Schizandra chinensis in Bulgaria
, Petkov VV (ed.), Sophia,
78.
Astanin YP, Mikhelson MY, Egolinskij YA. 1943. The study of
phenamine and some other stimulants effect on sport
running.
Farmakol Toxikol
6: 60– 65.
Barnaulov OD, Limarenko AY, Kurkin VA, Zapesochnaya GG,
Shchavlinskij AN. 1986. A comparative evaluation of the
biological activity of compounds isolated from species of
Rhodiola
.
Khim Pharm Zh
23: 1107–1112.
Berdyshev VV. 1995. Some specific effects of single doses of
adaptogens. In
Valeology: Diagnosis, Means and Practice
in Health Care
, Breckman II (ed.). Int. Collection of Scientific
Papers, Issue 2, Vladivostok, Dalnauka, 105–117.
Bogatova RI, Malozemov VV. 1994. Experimental research on
estimation of influence of single dose of phytoadaptogens
on short memory.
The Report on ADAPT 232.
Institute of
Medical and Biological Problems (IMBP): Moscow, 1–151.
Bogatova RI, Shlyakova LV, Salnitsky VP, Wikman G. 1997.
Evaluation of the effect of single take of a phytoadaptogen
STIMULATING EFFECT OF ADAPTOGENS 837
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
on human subject work ability during long isolation.
Aerospace Environ Med
31(4): 51–54.
Bombardelli E, Cristoni A, Lietti A. 1980. The effect of acute and
chronic ginseng saponins treatment on adrenals function:
Biochemical and pharmacological aspects. In
Proceedings
of 3rd International Ginseng Symposium
. Korea Ginseng
Research Institute: Seoul, Korea, 9–16.
Brekhman II, Dardymov IV. 1968. New substances of plant
origin which increase non-specific resistance.
Ann Rev
Pharmacol
8: 419– 430.
Bucci LR. 2000. Selected herbals and human exercise perform-
ance.
Am
J Clin Nutr
72 (Suppl): 624S– 636S.
Caso Marasco A, Vargas Ruiz R, Salas Villagomez A, Begona
Infante C. 1996. Double-blind study of a multivitamin com-
plex supplemented with ginseng extract.
Drugs Exp Clin
Res
22: 323– 329.
Chrousos GP, Gold PW. 1992. The concept of stress
system disorders: overview of behavioural and physical
homeostasis.
JAMA
267: 1244–1252.
Chrousos GP, McCarty R, Pacak K
et al.
1995. Stress: basic
mechanisms and clinical implications.
Ann NY Acad Sci
771: 396– 418.
Cicero AF, Derosa G, Brillante R, Bernardi R, Nascetti S,
Gaddi A. 2004. Effects of Siberian ginseng (
Eleutherococcus
senticosus
Maxim.) on elderly quality of life: a randomized
clinical trial.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr
(Suppl) 9: 69–73.
Dalinger OI. 1966. Effect of
Eleutherococcus
extract on
functional state of cardiovascular system and working
capacity of skiers. In
Stimulants of the Central Nervous
System
, Saratikov AS (ed.). Tomsk University Publishing
Press: Tomsk, 106–111.
Darbinyan V, Kteyan A, Panossian A, Gabrielian E, Wikman G,
Wagner H. 2000.
Rhodiola rosea
in stress-induced fatigue:
a double-blind cross-over study of a standardised extract
SHR-5 with a repeated low-dose regimen on the mental
performance of healthy physicians during night duty.
Phytomedicine
7: 365– 371.
Dardymov IV. 1976.
Ginseng, Eleutherococcus. On the Mech-
anism of Biological Activity.
Nauka: Moscow.
De Bock K, Eijnde BO, Ramaekers M, Hespel P. 2004. Acute
Rhodiola
intake can improve endurance exercise perform-
ance.
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab
14: 298– 307.
Earnest CP, Morss GM, Wyatt F
et al.
2004. Effect of a com-
mercial herbal-based formula on exercise performance in
cyclists.
Med Sci Sport Exerc
36: 504– 509.
Eglit NY, Zhukova VV, Kuznetsova VF, Kravchenko AN. 1965.
About the stimulating effect of
Schizandra chinensis
and its
use under physical loads. In
Materials of Scientific Meet-
ings of Khar’kov Scientific Medical Society
(Editors ?).
Zdirovya: Kiev, 829– 830.
ESCOP Monographs. 2003a. Eleutherococci radix. In
The
Scientific Foundation for Herbal Medicinal Products
, 2nd
edn. Thieme: Stuttgart, 142–149.
ESCOP Monographs. 2003b. Ginseng Radix. In
The Scientific
Foundation for Herbal Medicinal Products
, 2nd edn. Thieme:
Stuttgart, 211–222.
Fan W, Tezuka Y, Ni KM, Kadota S. 2001. Propyl-endoperoxidase
inhibitors from the underground part of
Rhodiola sacha-
linensis
.
Chem Pharm Bull
49: 396– 401.
Fink G. 2000.
Encyclopaedia of Stress
, Vol. 1–3. Academic Press:
San Diego.
Fulder S. 1980. The drug that builds Russians.
New Scientist
21: 83– 84.
Galochkina LN. 1948. About
Schizandra chinensis
effect on light
and color sensitivity of the eye.
Problemy Fiziologichekoy
Optiki
5: 71–73.
Grigorenko GF, Berdyshev VV. 1988. The use of tonic drinks
and drugs increasing working capacity of sailors during
night shifts.
Abstract Book of Scientific Practical Conference
on Medical and Social Aspects of the Man-Ocean Problem
,
118.
Ha Z, Zhu Y, Zhang X
et al.
2002. The effect of
Rhodiola
and
acetazolamide on the sleep architecture and sleep blood
oxygen saturation of persons living at 5380 meters above
sea level.
Chin J Tuberc Resp Dis
21: 1–6.
Harkey MR, Henderson GL, Gershwin ME, Stern JS, Hackman
RM. 2001. Variability in commercial ginseng products: an
analysis of 25 preparations.
Am J Clin Nutr
73: 1101–1106.
Hasan Samira MM, Attita Attita M, Allam M, Elwan O. 1985.
Effect of the standardized ginseng extract G115 on the
metabolism and electrical activity of the rabbit’s brain.
J Int
Med Res
13: 342– 348.
Kaliko IM, Tarasova AA. 1966. Effect of Leuzea and Golden
Root extracts on dynamic peculiarities of the highest neural
performance In
Stimulants of the Central Nervous System
,
Saratikov AS (ed.). Tomsk University Publishing Press:
Tomsk, 115–120.
Karo VI. 1945. The ergographic study of
Schizandra
stimulating
effect.
Scientific Papers of 3rd year Students of Naval Medi-
cal School, Leningrad
, Issue 3, 30– 33.
Kochmareva LI. 1958. The effect of
Schizandra chinensis
and
Ginseng on processes of concentration
.
In
Materials for the
Study of Ginseng and Schizandra
, Lazarev NV (ed.).
Issue
3. V.L. Komarov’s Far East Branch of USSR Academy of
Science: Leningrad, 12–17.
Kokhanova AN, Peresypkina NV, Balagurovskaya EN,
Kotel’nikova KM, Grigorieva IT. 1950. The effect of
Schizandra
on muscular fatigue in man. In
Proceedings of
the IV Student Scientific Session of Khabarovsk Medical
Institute, Khabarovsk
, 85– 89.
Komar VV, Kit SM, Sitschuk LV, Sitschuk VM. 1981. The effect
of Carpatian
Rhodiola rosea
on human mental activity.
Farmatsevticheskiy Zh
4: 62– 64.
Korolevich VS, Lupandin AV. 1967. The experience in using
Schizandra chinensis
seed preparation on the training of
gymnasts. In
Proceedings of Scientific Conference of the
Chair of Biological Disciplines of P.F. Lesgaft Military Phy-
sical Culture Institute on The Effect of Physical Exercises
and some other Physical Factors on the Organism Resist-
ance, Leningrad
, 166–170.
Krasik ED, Morozova ES, Petrova KP, Ragulina GA,
Shemetova LA, Shuvaev VP. 1970a. Therapy of asthenic
conditions: clinical perspectives of application of
Rhodiola
rosea
extract (golden root). In
Proceedings of Modern
Problems in Psycho-Pharmacology
, Avrutskiy GY (ed.).
Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences: Kemerovo
City, 298– 330.
Krasik ED, Petrova KP, Rogulina GA. 1970b. About the
adaptogenic and stimulating effect of
Rhodiola rosea
extract. In
Proceedings of All-union and 5th Sverdlovsk
Area Conference of Neurobiologists, Psychiatrists and
Neurosurgeons
, Avrutskiy GY (ed.). Sverdlovsk Press:
Sverdlovsk, 215– 217.
Kurkin VA, Dubishev AB, Titova IN
et al.
2003. Neurotropic
properties of some phytopreparations containing phenylpro-
panoids.
Rastit Resursi
3: 115–122.
Kurkin VA, Zapesochnaya GG. 1986. Chemical composition and
pharmacological properties of
Rhodiola rosea
.
Khim Pharm
Zurnal
20: 1231–1244.
Lapajev II. 1978.
Schizandra and its Curative Properties
, 3rd
amended and supplemented ed. Khabarovsk Book Press:
Khabarovsk.
Lapajev II. 1982. The effect or phytoadaptogens on working
capacity in sport divers. In
Modern Problems of Military
Medicine
,
Issue 2. Tomsk University Publishing: Tomsk,
170–172.
Lazarev NV. 1946. Experimental data on evaluation of Far
east Shizandra as a stimulator. In
Proceedings Scientific
Medical Council.
Vol. 5, No. 17. Military Publishing of the
Ministry of Defence of USSR: Leningrad, 62– 68.
Lazarev NV. 1962. Actual problems of the studies of the action
of adaptogens, particularly preparations of
Eleutherococcus
.
Symposium on
Ginseng
and
Eleutherococcus.
In
XX Meet-
ing on Investigations of Ginseng and other Medicinal Plants
of Far East.
DVFSO: Vladivostok, 7–14.
Lebedev AA. 1951a. Comparative evaluation of the stimulating
effect of various Schizandra products. In
Materials for
the Study of Stimulants and Tonics from Ginseng and
Schizandra Roots
, Lazarev NV (ed.). Issue 1. V.L. Komarov’s
Far East Branch of USSR Academy of Science: Vladivostok,
103–108.
Lebedev AA. 1951b. Some materials to the pharmacology
of schizandrin. In
Materials for the Study of Stimulants
and Tonics from Ginseng and Schizandra Roots
, Lazarev
NV (ed.). Issue 1. V.L. Komarov’s Far East Branch of USSR
Academy of Science: Vladivostok, 109–117.
Lebedev AA. 1955. On the pharmacology of
Schizandra
. In
Materials on Investigations of Ginseng and Shisandra
,
Lazarev NV (ed.), Issue 2. USSR Academy of Sciences
Publisher: Moscow, 178–188.
838 A. PANOSSIAN AND H. WAGNER
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 19, 819– 838 (2005)
Lebedev AA. 1967.
Schizandrin – A New Stimulant from
Schizandra chinensis
Fruits.
Summary of Thesis for a
Candidate’s Degree in Medicine
,
Tashkent.
Lebedev AA. 1971.
Schizandra.
Meditsina
Publishing House of
USSR: Tashkent.
Levchenko KP. 1971. The experience in using
Schisandra
seed
powder during training of basketball players. In
Abstract
Book of Conference on Biologically Active Substances of
Flora and Fauna of the Far East and Pacific Ocean
,
Vladivostok, 118.
Lupandin AV. 1990. Adaptation to natural and technogenic
extreme factors in trained and untrained adaptogen treated
individuals.
Fiziologia Cheloveka
16: 114–119.
Lupandin AV, Lapajev II. 1981.
Schizandra
. Khabarovskoye
Knizhnoye Izdatelstvo:
Khaharovsk, 1–89.
Marina TF. 1968. Effect of
Rhodiola rosea
extract on bio-
electrical activity of the cerebral cortex isolated to a dif-
ferent extent from the brain. In
Stimulants of the Central
Nervous System
, Saratikov AS (ed.). Tomsk State Univer-
sity Press: Tomsk, 27–31.
Marina TF, Alekseeva LP. 1968. Effect of
Rhodiola rosea
extract on electroencephalograms in rabbit. In
Stimulants
of the Central Nervous System
, Saratikov AS (ed.). Tomsk
State University Press: Tomsk, 22– 26.
Marina TF, Mikhaleva LK, Suslov NI. 1994. Comparative
effects of para-tyrosol and
Rhodiola
extract on the central
nervous system. In
Proceedings of a Joint Plenary Session
of Pathophysiologists and Pharmacologists of Siberia
and the Far East on Mechanisms of the Development
of Pathological Processes.
Kemerovo State University Press:
Kemerovo, 66– 68.
Medvedev MA. 1963. Effect of Ginseng and Eleutherococcus
on working parameters of radio-telegraph operators. In
Materials of Studies of Ginseng and other Medicinal Plants
of Far East
, Brekhman II, Belikov IF, Kurentsova GE (eds),
Issue 5. Primorye Publishing Press: Vladivostok, 237– 239.
Mikhailova MN. 1983. Clinical and experimental substantia-
tion of asthenic conditions therapy using
Rhodiola Rosea
extract. In
Current Problems of Psychiatry
, Goldsberg ED
(ed.). Tomsk State University Press: Tomsk, 126–127.
Murtazin IM. 1946.
Schizandra chinensis
as a stimulant under
long physical loads.
Farmakol Toxikol
9: 12–13.
Narimanian M, Badalyan M, Panosyan V
et al.
2005. Impact
of Chisan® (ADAPT-232) on the quality-of-life and its efficacy
as an adjuvant in the treatment of acute non-specific
pneumonia.
Phytomedicine
(in press).
Nishibe S, Kinoshita H, Takeda H, Okano G. 1990. Phenolic
compounds from stem bark of
Acanthopanax senticosus
and their pharmacological effect in chronic swimming
stressed rats.
Chem Pharm Bull
38: 1763–1765.
Nörr H. 1993. Phytochemical and pharmacological investiga-
tions of the adaptogens:
Eleutherococcus senticosus,
Ocimum sanctum, Codonopsis pilosula, Rhodiola rosea
and
Rhodiola crenulata
. PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Chemistry
and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximillians University, Munich.
Panossian A. 2003. Adaptogens: Tonic herbs for fatigue and
stress.
Alt Comp Ther
9: 327–332.
Panossian A, Gabrielian E, Wagner H. 1997. Plant adaptogens
II.
Bryonia
as an adaptogen.
Phytomedicine
4: 83– 97.
Panossian A, Gabrielian E, Wagner H. 1999a. On the mechanism
of action of plant adaptogens with particular references on
cucurbitacin R diglucoside.
Phytomedicine
6: 147–155.
Panossian A, Oganessian A, Ambartsumian M, Gabrielian E,
Wagner H, Wikman G. 1999b. Effects of heavy physical
exercise and adaptogens on nitric oxide content in human
saliva.
Phytomedicine
6: 17–26.
Panossian A, Wikman G, Wagner H. 1999c. Plant adaptogens
III. Earlier and more recent aspects and concepts on their
mode of actions.
Phytomedicine
6: 287–300.
Petkov V. 1978. Effect of Ginseng on the brain biogenic
monoamines and 3′5′-AMP system. Experiments on rats.
Arzneimittelforsch
28: 338– 339.
Petkov VD, Yonkov D, Mosharoff A, Kambourova T, Alova L,
Petkov VV. 1986. Effects of alcohol aqueous extract from
Rhodiola rosea
L. roots on learning and memory.
Acta
Physiol Pharmacol Bulg
12: 3–16.
Roslyakova NA, Bogatova RI, Vezirishvili MO, Wikman G. 2000.
The effect of a single dose of Rodelim phytoadaptogen
on the performance of operators under intensive activity.
In
Abstract Book of Scientific Practical Conference on Bio-
logically Active Food Supplements and Natural Medicines
in the Prophylaxis, Treatment and Rehabilitation, Moscow
,
157–160.
Saratikov AS, Krasnov EA. 2004.
Rhodiola rosea (Golden root):
A Valuable Medicinal Plant.
Tomsk University Press: Tomsk,
1–205.
Saratikov AS, Marina TF, Kaliko IM. 1965. The stimulating effect
of
Rhodiola rosea
on the higher brain structures.
Newslett
Sib Branch USSR Acad Sci
8: 120–125.
Saratikov AS, Marina TF, Fisanova LL. 1978. Mechanism of action
of salidrozide on the metabolism of cerebral catecholamines.
Vopr Med Khim
5: 624– 621.
Selye H. 1950.
Stress.
Acta Medical Publisher: Montreal, 1–
127.
Shevtsov VA, Zholus BI, Shervarly VI
et al.
2003. A randomised
trial of two different doses of a SHR-5
Rhodiola rosea
ex-
tract versus placebo and control of capacity for mental work.
Phytomedicine
10: 95–105.
Sokolov SY, Boyko VP, Kurkin VA, Zapesochnaya GG,
Rvantsova NV, Grinenko HA. 1990. A comparative study of
the stimulant property of certain phenylpropanoids.
Khim
Pharm Zh
24: 66– 68.
Spasov AA, Mandrikov VB, Mironova IA. 2000a. The effect of
the preparation rhodiosin on the psychophysiological and
physical adaptation of students to an academic load.
Eksp
Klin Farmakol
63: 76–78.
Spasov AA, Wikman GK, Mandrikov VB, Mironova IA,
Neumoin VV. 2000b. A double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot
study of the stimulating and adaptogenic effect of
Rhodiola
rosea
SHR-5 extract on the fatigue of students caused by
stress during an examination period with a repeated low-
dose regimen.
Phytomedicine
7: 85– 89.
Stancheva SL, Mosharrof A. 1987. Effect of the extract of
Rhodiola rosea
L. on the content of the brain biogenic
monoamines.
Med Physiol CR Acad Bulg Sci
40: 85– 87.
Strokina TI. 1967. The changes in higher nervous activity in
neurotic patients under treatment with Eleutherococcus.
Lekastvennie Sredstva Dalnego Vostoka
7: 201–211.
Trusov MS. 1953. The effect of the far east
Schizandra chinensis
on some visual functions.
Voyenno-Medotsinskij Zh
10: 57–
62.
Trusov MS. 1958a.
Schizandra chinensis
effect on adaptation
to darkness. In
Materials for the Study of Ginseng and
Schizandra
, Lazarev NV (ed.).
Far East Branch of USSR
Academy of Science Publishing: Vladivostok, 170–176.
Trusov MS. 1958b.
The Effect of Vitamin A, Eserine and
Schizandra chinensis
on Light Sensitivity of the Visual
Organ.
Summary of Thesis for a Candidate Degree in
Medicine: Khabarovsk, 24– 29.
Tuzov SF. 1968. Comparative characteristics of the effect of
some CNS stimulants on muscular capacity on men. In
Stimulants of the Central Nervous System
, Saratikov AS
(ed.). Tomsk University Publishing Press: Tomsk, 156–161.
Vezirishvili MO, Roslyakova NA, Wikman G. 1999. The experi-
ence in developing an up-to-date biologically active supple-
ment
. Medicina Altera International Academy of Sciences
of Nature and Society Magazine
, November, 44– 46.
Viru AA. 1981.
Hormonal Mechanisms of Adaptation and
Training.
Nauka: Leningrad, 154.
Wagner H, Norr H, Winterhoff H. 1994. Plant adaptogens.
Phytomedicine
1: 63–76.
Yefimova VA, Kokhanova AI, Majburd ED. 1954. On the problem
of
Schizandra chinensis
effect on the cerebral cortex activity.
Khabarovsk Medical Institute, Khabarovsk, Collection 13, 52–
57.
Zapesochnaya GG, Kurkin VA, Boyko VP, Kolkhir VK. 1995.
Phenylpropanoids – promising biological active compounds
of medicinal plants.
Khim Farm Zh
29: 47– 50.
Zotova MI. 1965. The effect of
Rhodiola rosea
extract on
mental working activity in man. In
Collection of Reports at
3rd Scientific Conference of Physiologists
,
Biochemists and
Pharmacologists of Western Siberia, Tomsk
, 298– 299.